Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/02
- 2024
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 February 2024
Reason: High level of vandelism from Wikipedia contributors after an INO employee made adjustments to reflect the current organization of the company and Canadian industries it is present in. All the changes were reverted to the outdated content of the page. Reasons were stated as the content was promotional, however, this was not the case. For visitors of the INO page, the current content does not provide a true profile of the company. INO Canada (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not what this page is for. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 21:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- The article stood like this for time which should be revdel'd and vandalism/disruptive editing continues by various IPs. S0091 (talk) 21:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The
C U N T
isn't enough for a RD. DatGuyTalkContribs 22:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)- You made my day. Thank you. Toketaatalk 23:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism that needs reviewing. JMHamo (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Mtattrain (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Spicy. 69.94.56.76 (talk) 03:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent IP vandalism of sourced content; page has had many rounds of protection. czar 00:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm reconsidering that a higher level of protection than PC may be warranted given the fact it's an FAC article, among other reasons. Chetsford (talk) 00:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The cadence of vandalism is so slow-moving and the stakes here are really so low, that indefinite EC may be an overreaction.Chetsford (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Regular IP additions of unreferenced information, claiming he has changed clubs. Seasider53 (talk) 01:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Article has been attracting BLP vandals over the past few days. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Over an album's status, confusing to reviewers due to multiple similar IP's arguing. Geardona (talk to me?) 19:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting restoring semi-protection for this page because the same vandals putting in fake information about a fake fourth season have returned to resume vandalizing the page. Mr Fink (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism from new/IP multiple users Shaws username (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 22:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Owula kpakpo (talk) 01:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from an IP user; adding episodes and supposed end date that aren't available in the provided sources. There has also been a minor issue cropping up lately, where users are adding an air date to one of the episodes, when it aired a month prior. Unless temporary protection is added, various users will continue these issues. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. jayhawker6 (talk) 01:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic as it relates to antisemitism and sexism. 74.71.4.108 (talk) 01:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 02:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. USSR-Slav (talk) 02:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. El_C 04:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent POV additions from various IP addresses. Panian513 03:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year (as WP:AP2), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits by IP after the page got unprotected. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 04:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 05:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Request two or three weeks full protection due to slow-motion edit-warring between established users. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 02:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent disruptive editing: please protect it until AfD concluded. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 06:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @NmWTfs85lXusaybq: Please use Talk:Qianliyan (disambiguation) to let me know if one week is too short. The solution, as I have written on talk, is to not edit war! Johnuniq (talk) 07:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The subject died, so all those old versions hotly debated previously (which triggered the protection) are now obsolete. Besides, there's a new and well-sourced, neutral version, at: Paul Laviolette. XiounuX (talk) 02:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined and article deleted under G4 of the WP:CSD, and salted. You need to go to WP:DRV if you want it reinstated instead of trying to recreate a salted article under a different name. For reference: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul LaViolette (3rd nomination). Dennis Brown 2¢ 02:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Additionally, user blocked as a sockpuppet of Serpentdove. Dennis Brown 2¢ 02:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 128.172.35.19 (talk) 05:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 05:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 07:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent insertion of false data with sources that do not verify the claims from IPs of a block evader User:Dismant39 going back many months to a year, at least. Protection log shows track record of protections applied. Last one significant one was for 3 months. Can we step it up to a longer duration?. — Archer1234 (t·c) 06:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – pesky IP hopping user who cites Discogs and other Wikipedia's as his sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speed_metal&diff=prev&oldid=1200608323 Has been trying to force his preferred change into the article since November (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) --FMSky (talk) 06:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism/disruptive editing. Magitroopa (talk) 06:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of edits that looks to be edit warring between two users. Likely to get worse given game is subject of online controversy. Suggest Extended Confirmed Protection for now. Rambling Rambler (talk) 22:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 04:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Avoid page vandalism and false information. Bodibilguun (talk) 02:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 04:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits by IPs again and again. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 04:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 04:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism adding yet more unconfirmed material because of the shutdown of CNN Philippines, which has required several reverts. This field (Philippines TV) is known for its heavy load of vandals and editors adding fictitious information. The replacement for CNN Philippines, RPTV, as yet has no in-house news programs. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, keeping re-adding on RPTV programming lineup even the program is a CNN/I newscast. BeemoKincaid (talk) 09:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Apparently the same person using different IP proxies is spreading negative information about a Russian opposition politician in violation of WP:BLP policy, doing so in a disruptive way, waging edit wars against multiple editors and misrepresenting sources. Tobby72 (talk) 12:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Insertion of inside jokes without context. Going on for days. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Defamation based on deceiving information. DigitasSL (talk) 14:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism - spurts of IP disruption going back years, and vandalism has been coming thick and fast for the last few days. Entranced98 (talk) 16:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Was about to request this. I was too slow. Toketaatalk 16:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, and many users tried to revert those edits multiple times since there is no such announcement from RPTV since the in-house news still not develop, or those select CNN Philippines' newscast will carried over, or renamed on the new channel. BeemoKincaid (talk) 09:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple vandalism by IP address, and reverts since RPTV no such announcement if the CNN Philppines' afternoon newscast will carried over on the new channel since the in-house news still not developed. BeemoKincaid (talk) 10:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Numerous vandal edits in less than 12 hours. TheHotwiki (talk) 12:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry and edit warring. Skitash (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Currently in the news, so quite a lot of nonsensical changes/vandalism by new accounts and IPs: [1], [2], [3]. I suggest semi-protection for the time being. Mai-Sachme (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also add CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – He has reportedly been hired for a new position with a new team, however, the new team has not made an official announcement that he's been hired. IPs are prematurely editing the page prior to the team's official announcement. Rockchalk717 19:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: A mix of disruptive edits, unsourced additions, & WP:NOTBROKEN violations. —a smart kitten[meow] 19:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is quite concerning, WP:LTA/ARARAT is having quite the run right now, constantly jumping from IP to IP, making a block pretty much futile. Orontes I, Orontes II and Orontes III for example just recently got protected due to their persistent disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal attacking the page today. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently unprotected, now the subject of repeated vandalism again. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 21:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Mass attack. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:D8DA:7D4C:8099:C3E4 (talk) 21:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High leve of IP vandalisms. As soon as a previous protection expires, they re-start. I suggest permanent protection for the page allowing only registered users to edit. Riktetta (talk) 10:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It seems the regular editors on the page are handling it well enough. There are disruptive edits only ever few days since protection expired. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Back-to-back addition of promo content without references. Sir Tragedy (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The webpage is now very outdated and there has been an increase in following his professional career given the recent win at the Asian Games. Kindly request that the protection is reduced to remedy the misinformation. Kp031298 (talk) 19:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Abhay Singh (squash player) is not protected. Favonian (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
02 February 2024
Reason: Lots of IP/user vandalism. over the past DAY. Toketaatalk 19:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:49:0:7fd0::/64 (talk · contribs). Partial block for one week. Favonian (talk) 19:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Sinclairian (talk) 20:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Isi96 (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent IP vandal edits. Vandal(s) using multiple mobile phones. — That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 22:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Several IPs were blocked by several administrators. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. The nationality of this company is persistently changed to Chinese, more or less exclusively by IP editors or new users. TylerBurden (talk) 22:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: New Accounts which Show IP addresses aka accounts that don't know the rules, are adding and changing the infobox without proper due diligence, gave them a reason in the backlog, nonetheless, they keep ignoring it. Therefore I ask for Ethiopia page to have protection. Its a page with thousands of traffic, and it seems Bad Faith and Propaganda CtasACT CtasACT (talk) 00:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @CtasACT: Do not edit war. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The games are almost over, but NFL poorly-sourced rumor season continues. Please consider semi-protecting for several days. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 05:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
There are lint errors on the page. This is fixed in this edit. Please copy that content over. Gonnym (talk) 09:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Done. @Gonnym: Basically you could have requested to change all the HTML 'center' tags to CSS text-align:center directives. But thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing unsourced birthdate edits, first from a named account that has since been blocked (with possible socks) and now from an IP. Please protect to auto-confirmed status. Shearonink (talk) 19:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, and multiple times to manually revert those vandalism, since the channel is yet on soft launch, others are trying to add some programs that are not yet promoted on the channel. BeemoKincaid (talk) 00:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ItsCheck (talk) 01:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandal edits from vandal only users. TheHotwiki (talk) 01:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP attempting to inject non-sourced POV. Marcus Markup (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic, related to the Arab–Israeli conflict Ccole2006 (talk) 03:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. As WP:PIA WP:ECR. El_C 12:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I Do Not Think This Page Deserves PRotection Even Pending. Jeremy2014August (talk) 01:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected: unconvinced unprotection would be a net positive here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content, content that misrepresents and misquotes the sources given, irrelevant information, and overlinks by 67.166.136.47 and IPv6 alias 2601:205:4300* extending back to October 2023. I have made repeated attempts both in edit summaries and user's talk page talk page to guide him toward respect for basic Wikipedia principles, none of which have been heeded or acknowledged. Behavior extends to a myriad of other pages as well. Rift (talk) 03:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unsourced info. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, also RD. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Reporting again as the persistent vandalism is ongoing. Greenman (talk) 07:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits on practically a daily basis from WP:LTA/TGH. Loafiewa (talk) 08:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Mutia ti la union updates. Nobody (talk) 08:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. As WP:GS/PAGEANT. El_C 12:29, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level POV pushing. See its talk page. Imperial[AFCND] 08:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Arthur Smith (American football, born 1982) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Kellen Moore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: After semi-protection, confirmed users continue to add poorly-sourced rumors as fact to these two articles. A few EC users have also done the same, but I'm trying to leave notices. Requesting temporary ECP for a week or two. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for the duration (both). El_C 12:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism, repeated cases of CoI edits. AlphaBetaGammsh (talk) 01:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 12:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic, related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Ccole2006 (talk) 03:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No edits in 2024. El_C 12:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- International recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – an IP hopper keeps targetting this article (ether adding content that isn't properly sourced or removing content). M.Bitton (talk) 13:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: do not vandalise my page under no reason. use permission secrion in the talk page. Shonyx (talk) 14:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We don't pre-emptively protect user pages. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Lesser General Public License (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: I might be missing something, but this page has no real incoming links and does not seem to be part of any aspect of the project unlike Wikipedia:Copyrights. Unclear why this is protected. Gonnym (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'll ping @WikiLeon: who protected this for input...not an admin anymore, but still active. My 2c: I wouldn't unprotect this...it is, after all, of legal importance. Lectonar (talk) 15:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
legal importance
to who? If its supposed to be a copy of a version of a generic license, Wikipedia isn't the place for it. Gonnym (talk) 15:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)- A thought: if Wikipedia isn’t the place for it then it can go to WP:MFD. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- The page is not alone. There are several more found here. I tend to agree with previous comments: the pages should not be unprotected, but a discussion (RFC?) about their relevance on Wikipedia might be called for. Favonian (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. I don't have an issue with them being here, and would prefer they stay protected. They are linked from a number of user pages, and there are probably few watchers to catch potential vandalism. It does have legal ramifications. Dennis Brown 2¢ 02:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- The page is not alone. There are several more found here. I tend to agree with previous comments: the pages should not be unprotected, but a discussion (RFC?) about their relevance on Wikipedia might be called for. Favonian (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- A thought: if Wikipedia isn’t the place for it then it can go to WP:MFD. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This page was indefinitely semi-protected in 2013. It was redirected by consensus at AFD last August. I highly doubt that protection is still needed. The protecting admin no longer has the mop. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I note that it was protected by Jimbo Wales. Never saw one of those before. And I do not see why any unconfirmed account or anonymous IP address would need to edit it. The history is available for merging into the target, and that's all that needs to be done. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I agree per Anachronist. Redirects are less watched, so easier to get vandalism go unnoticed. And for some reason, children's shows and cartoons seem to be ripe for vandalism, redirect or article, so I would lean towards keeping it simply because protection is a net positive. Put another way, out of the next possible 100 edits to that page (if unprotected), it is likely that all 100 would be vandalism, not valid changes. Dennis Brown 2¢ 08:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Popular article that is often vandalised or edited unconstructively. Indef edit protection makes sense, or at least a lengthy one. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 17:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Berig (talk) 20:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP continuous content removal. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 20:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Since October 2022, IPs and socks (likely of Connor19986) persistently remove sourced content, likely by the subject of the article or someone acting on their behalf. — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Berig (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Other editors are engaging in edit war and are denying a fact about a well known fighter. so the page needs to be protected. Amtsrbh32 (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- You realize this is only going to lock you out of the page, and not me or Cassiopeia? Nswix (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Amtsrbh32 has been blocked.
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 08:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Financial vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – random IP editors upset (imo rightfully so) adding unsourced OR/SYNTH to the page after congresspersons recent statements to palestinian peace protesters. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 16:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. @LegalSmeagolian: While I have protected it due to vandalism and bad faith edits, I would strongly recommend reading MOS:BLPLEAD and WP:UNDUE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. – 64andtim (talk) 19:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's not really a content dispute. People are adding the wrong date of death over and over. Additionally the article is getting hit with spam. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- It might be persistent disruptive editing… – 64andtim (talk) 20:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Seems to have subsided thankfully. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Favonian (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – keeps getting infested with spam. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 20:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator JBW. Favonian (talk) 20:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Sockpuppetry. Shadow311 (talk) 16:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: TFA. Recent IP/WP:SPA disruptive editing. GuardianH (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of vandalism. Toketaatalk 17:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 18:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Hotwiki: Why do you have "The" tacked on the front of your username in your signature? Please see WP:CUSTOMSIG/P. Also, it might be a good idea to add an inline comment to that section of the article. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
03 February 2024
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unexplained date-changing contrary to source, by IPs and by now-blocked new accounts User:ElectricSamoa and User:InternalSesaleBobaYozera. That last one has created Draft:InternalSesaleBobaYozera with the text "InternalSesaleBobaYozera is an internet troll dedicated solely to renaming Jerome Foster II birthday to March 10 instead of March 9. We will never stop until the date is gonna be changed to March 10.". NebY (talk) 19:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Temp semi protection. The pending changes is working but oh my god is it annoying to manage and I have seen 10+ pending edits stacked on each other. Toketaatalk 19:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High to moderate levels of ip vandalism and non-constructive edits, many of which are constantly being reverting Ⓒ𝕝乇тᵉⓇ (α ɯσɾԃ?) 20:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of unsourced changes Robby.is.on (talk) 21:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. LTA target. – 64andtim (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Widr. El_C 23:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. Same LTA target as above. – 64andtim (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Widr. El_C 23:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 19:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Done. El_C 22:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- @El C: I was looking at this one and took too long to decide on a course of action. It might be worth considering one year instead of indefinite. The article has only had two edits since June and only one of those was problematic. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Andrewbf from Mexico. Same protection needed for Runaway Horses (album) and Mad About You (Belinda Carlisle song). Binksternet (talk) 22:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by non-autoconfirmed users. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 08:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🇮🇱🇺🇸JayCubby has an NPOV on the Isr.-Pal. Conflict🇮🇱🇺🇸 talk 14:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Berig (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Sockpuppets and vandalism Alexeyevitch(talk) 00:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DanCherek (talk) 00:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent disruptive editing and edit warring. ButlerBlog (talk) 17:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. @Butlerblog: It would be good to start with some user talk page notices explaining the reversions with the relevant MOS guidelines. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent persistent sockpuppetry. —a smart kitten[meow] 01:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent persistent sockpuppetry. —a smart kitten[meow] 01:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent persistent sockpuppetry. —a smart kitten[meow] 01:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. El_C 23:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- February 2024 United States bombing of Iraq and Syria (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: ECP arbitration enforcement Israel/Palestine, spillover of the Israel–Hamas war. Ecrusized (talk) 22:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. El_C 23:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Tagged under WP:KURDS and WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent persistent sockpuppetry. —a smart kitten[meow] 01:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by the IP users Protect to 1 year. Shalomie ☮️ (she/her/hers) •~Talk~• •Contribs• 23:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Too many vandalism, random people like adding unconfirmed stuffs and based on their desires, not facts Conam-san (talk) 02:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 03:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit Wars Olek Novy (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:CTOPS enforcement under WP:ARBEE. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Euryalus. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 05:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 05:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock who has been abusing autoconfirmed accounts to disrupt the article since, at least, February 2023. See Talk:Same-sex_marriage#Persistent_sock_targeting_this_article for more information, and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sotavino for the latest sock. Autoconfirmed protection doesn't stop this sock, hence requesting extended confirmation protection. Bennv123 (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I did put a CTOPS notice on the talk page, where discussion of this issue is about a month old. Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP addition of unsourced material, along with the following articles, Tuomas Holopainen and Auri (band). HorrorLover555 (talk) 04:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:6c44:6a00:14e4::/64 (talk · contribs). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Have also reported to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kfact1only. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Mz7. Favonian (talk) 09:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring vandalism by IPs since 1 February. Intermittent disruptive editing prior to this (e.g. [4], [5], [6], [7]). R Prazeres (talk) 05:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:FA12:8A00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Revert warring by WP:LTA/GRP on proxies. JavaHurricane 12:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IPs from the same geographical area. Annh07 (talk) 06:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Our friend, the prolific sock puppet Kelowantogdog has returned. This edit [8] by the IP from Toronto, 199.119.233.168. Even the same edit summary "Rescued valid citations once again" shows that is someone who has edited the article before. Compare that edit by the IP with this edit by Kelowantogdog's sock puppet DJ drama23 [9]. And compare that edit with another of Kelowna's sock puppets, Jet Lii [10], [11], and [12]. All these edits are clearly by the same person, and that person has been blocked. This is a my first time asking for page protection for this article, but it is not my first time asking for page protection from Kelownatopdog. It has been my experience that imposing page protection for a short time does not work with him because he just starts editing again the moment the page protection expires, and so for this reason, I would this article protected for a least a considerable period of time. Thank you for your time and help. --A.S. Brown (talk) 06:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @A.S. Brown: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: the same as above. Our friend, the prolific sock puppet Kelowantogdog has returned. This [13] by the IP 199.119.233.168 that occurred on 2 February just 14 minutes apart from the edit on the Alkhalil family is clearly the work of the same person. Even the highly misleading edit summary "Citations removed for what reason?" is very typical of Kelowantopdog's editing style. And it is useful to compare that edit with this edit [14] by Watchthislilsuzy, another of Kelowantopdog's sock puppets. Given that Kelowantopdog never takes the hint and just starts editing an article the moment the page protection expires, would it possible to have this article protected for a substantial period of time. Thank you for your time and help. --A.S. Brown (talk) 07:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @A.S. Brown: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently a Netflix series was released about the drug trafficker, which is my guess why there's an increase of vandalism. A temp edit protection should probably do the trick. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits by IP. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 17:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. – 64andtim (talk) 17:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 18:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Live updates! It doesn't work like that! Island92 (talk) 22:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Question: what? El_C 23:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Live updates on statistics while matches are being played. Island92 (talk) 07:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @El C: See WP:LIVESCORES. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not sufficient. Should have been done at least till the tournament is completed. Island92 (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- That, IMO, can be done if this happens regularly during the tournament. Otherwise it's preemptive.
- Alternatively, I would consider tournament-length protections more acceptable if they were PC rather than semi Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not sufficient. Should have been done at least till the tournament is completed. Island92 (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Live updates on statistics while matches are being played. Island92 (talk) 07:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – EWLO to circumvent consensus. Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent disruptive edits. Sir Calculus (talk) 18:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing, including from autoconfirmed accounts, and unlikely that this will end in the foreseeable future. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 11:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Issues of disruptive editing and misuse of the article for promotional purposes have returned since previous protection expired. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 11:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 16:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – single IP keep adding unsourced stuff; reverted multiple times. Fama Clamosa (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same reason as last PP, unabated disruption by IP socks (e.g. [15]) on a page covered by WP:CASTE sanctions. Asking for perma PP as the socking has been going on for years now and is unlikely to budge. Gotitbro (talk) 12:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There hasn't been much activity on that page in over a month. Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been multiple attempt to change photo in infobox with a unknown child in the photo. After multiple reverts, the edit keeps happening. I request page protection so the page is not continuously vandalized. Aadirulez8 (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 20:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- February 2024 United States bombing of Iraq and Syria (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: ECP arbitration enforcement Israel/Palestine, spillover of the Israel-Hamas war. Disruptive editing in the infobox, adding unsourced changes. Ecrusized (talk) 10:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Also, since the request was made, edit warring by unregistered users reverting cited material. Ecrusized (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It still looks pretty tame. I have added an editnotice making the 1RR restriction clear (it had not been before). Let's see what effect that has. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of disruptive edits by anon IPs. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 11:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page, though. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – unsourced genre additions, so upgrade to semi protection is needed. the pending changes obviously doesnt make much sense when unsourced additions are immediately accepted https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soul_of_a_New_Machine&diff=prev&oldid=1202602205. FMSky (talk) 11:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined I would take it up with the user who accepted the edit you reverted first before requesting a protection upgrade. And I would also consider that there has been only one such edit since PCP was imposed. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
04 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 10:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 112.207.182.240 (talk · contribs) blocked by Graeme Bartlett. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 00:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 00:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection for two weeks (i.e. until after the event ends). Spike in vandalism and unsourced edits from new and anonymous editors due to festivities drawing near. Yue🌙 04:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 04:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I don't know how many other articles have been targeted, but at least Miss Philippines Earth, Miss Earth 2024 and Miss Philippines Earth 2014 have seen the same additions and required protection in the past month. Onorem (talk) 23:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/PAGEANT. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recent disruption. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ingenuity. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dylan Florida. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing by IPs. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 05:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Can someone please protect this article and block the IP commenting against Israel?. Jetstreamer Talk 21:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. The IP has been blocked for 3 days for disruptive editing and alerted about WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Aesthetically appealing (talk) 06:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. @Aesthetically appealing: This page was been protected since November. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: disruptive editing by IPs. Aesthetically appealing (talk) 06:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. @Aesthetically appealing: This page was been protected since November. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Spamming with unsourced hearsay, and corrupting pages. Fragrant Peony (talk) 05:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continuing block evasion by Kelownatopdog. This edit today [16] by an IP from Toronto bears all the hallmarks of Kelowantopdog. Compare that edit with this edit [17] by another IP from Toronto. Note how Kelowantopdog always puts the names of other editors in quotation marks. For furhter comparison, look at this edit [18] by one of Kelownatopdog's sock puppets. Given that this article has been protected twice before because of Kelowantopdog (see here [19] and here [20]), surely it is time for more sterner measures? Our friend Kelownatopdog is no doubt laughing at all us as he continues his merry rampage of block evasion, sock puppetry, petty insults and ethnic-religious chauvinism across the encyclopedia, and so for this reason would it please be possible to have this article protected for a considerable period of time? Whenever the page protection expires, Kelownatopdog just starts editing again, which is which this problem continues. Thank you for your time and help. --A.S. Brown (talk) 06:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated BLP violations (addition of controversial and possibly false biographical details, unreferenced). DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- February 2024 United States airstrikes in Iraq and Syria (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Repetitive disruptive editing, adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ecrusized (talk) 10:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism; always not adhering to MOS:PHIL Allyriana000 (talk) 03:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user keeps changing date without citing a reliable source. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked by PhilKnight. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring. JoycesUllysses (talk) 08:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Philippine Airlines fleet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Philippine Airlines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. User still makes a disruptive editing on the said pages I mentioned plus I already left the message at talk page here.Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 02:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. @Cornerstone2.0: WP:ANEW is the best place to report issues about edit warring, especially if it's just one user. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring, unexplained content removal from various IPs. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is a WP:content dispute. You can't just lock me out because you don't agree with the changes. 92.40.212.157 (talk) 10:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Furthermore, this is presently being discussed on the talk page, as I have made an attempt to do so already per WP:Dispute resolution. 92.40.212.157 (talk) 10:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment:The IP is using multiple IPs is to edit, which already is rangeblocked. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is being phrased as if I'm using sockpuppetry in order to get my way, which isn't the case at all. I am using a shared public IP, which can be displayed on my talk page, hence my address changes periodically. 92.40.212.157 (talk) 10:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment:The IP is using multiple IPs is to edit, which already is rangeblocked. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This is an edit war over a content dispute, not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Request for Temporary semi-protection due to persistent disruptive editing by new users / burner accounts and IP users. TucanHolmes (talk) 12:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Hig level of vandalisam, so i was asked by mr. Radoncic, to get full protection of his page Armolino (talk) 11:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Administrators on the English language Wikipedia have no authority over the Bosnian one. Favonian (talk) 12:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting downgrade of protection as the dispute in question has been resolved/mooted, but not complete unprotection because of the tendency for IP's to tinker with the medals. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. Please start by consulting with the protecting administrator (El C) as per Wikipedia:Protection policy § Submitting requests. @El C: Pinging to let you know in advance. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the protection was imposed far long ago. And this is not a common page, so unlocking is fair. ....... . 2001:EE0:4BCA:FD50:B50C:773B:1A40:16BA (talk) 11:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. Please start by consulting with the protecting administrator (MER-C) as per Wikipedia:Protection policy § Submitting requests. @MER-C: Pinging to let you know in advance. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 15:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topic related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. ARBPIA. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Alebir (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. If you need to do test edits, please use the Wikipedia:Sandbox. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs continually making unsourced changes to "historical affiliations". Mellk (talk) 12:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection was originally applied to GameMaker: Studio until a page with the title became a redirect to GameMaker. Anthony Appleyard, the one who protected the article back in 19 July 2013 (look here), did not specify why he protected the article. He is also deceased, so I cannot discuss this with him.
I am requesting to unprotect this article due to a lack of concern for disruptive editing. CarlFilip19 (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Unprotected Acroterion (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High-level politician, former prime minister, and current vice president of the senate. Should not be editable by anyone. Bisharakhuri1 (talk) 16:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- That isn't how this works. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Joyous! Noise! 17:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Thunberg's page is again expediting vandalism. Mainly changes to her name. I suggest/request placing another 30-day "Extended Confirmed Protection" on her page. Thank you . . . That's Not My Name 2020 (talk) 18:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal moved here after Dating was semiprotected. MrOllie (talk) 21:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 21:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding to all these. I grab them from AIV or my watchlist and don't normally check rfpp to see if I need to do any paperwork. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
05 February 2024
Reason: Contentious topic, related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Ccole2006 (talk) 00:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Every significant contribution since mid 2023 has been copyvio and/or POV pushing by pro-Qatar and anti-Qatar sockfarms. MarioGom (talk) 10:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: 2 months Semi-protection: Sockpuppet tampering with main cast even after block via IPs. Imsaneikigai (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also left CTOPS notice on talk page. If we go to longer protections in the future, we really need to think about whether we want to just drop PCP entirely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes. JayCubby plz edit my user pg! Talk 22:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 23:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: page protection to prevent IP vandalism Asteramellus (talk) 22:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Related to the recent semi-protection of Denise Welch and this ANI thread. This page has been a magnet for vandalism related to Denise Welch from both IPs and non semi-protected editors. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 23:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism Roblox888i3 (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 21:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/PW. @Daniel Case: It looks like we conflicted again. I logged this as enforcement for WP:GS/PW as it seems very likely that disruption will continue due to the topic area and the article history. I'm going to take a break from this page for an hour or two if you want to finish the remaining requests. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK ... I was unaware of the general sanctions. Daniel Case (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: repeated removal of polls from table Yet again, the three most recent polls are being removed from the table in this article: [21] Despite the article having been protected twice by @User:Daniel Case, the latest one not having expired yet, another lower-access level editor has removed three polls on spurious grounds; it essentially amounts to continued disruptive editing. The current protection level is "Autoconfirmed and confirmed users". The editors who have recently removed these polls appear to be either unregistered, new users, or autoconfirmed, who have not edited much else recently. The most recent removal of these polls is another example: [22] I strongly suspect that pro-monarchy bias is behind these continued removals of the three recent polls. More to the point, it looks like the Republicanism in the United Kingdom article needs increased protection please.--TrottieTrue (talk) 00:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @TrottieTrue: This is a content dispute and must be resolved via WP:DR. It's not reasonable in this situation to adjust the protection to exclude some editors and I will post on talk suggesting an RfC. I have not examined the bulk of your above comment but it might contain some research into the possible identity of an editor. That would be WP:OUTING and would require that you be blocked. In general, do not comment on other editors. Johnuniq (talk) 01:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for adding the protection. Regarding the editor, I have removed the content that you refer to, but I believe that they have "posted their own information, or links to such information, on Wikipedia", as per WP:OUTING. You say "In general, do not comment on other editors." In this case, there are grounds to suspect that the editor has the same identity as a previously blocked editor. Should that not be reported? TrottieTrue (talk) 01:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic, related to the Arab–Israeli conflict Ccole2006 (talk) 00:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in nearly two months ... wow, real contentious there!!! Daniel Case (talk) 22:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 97.202.202.252 (talk · contribs) blocked by Aoidh. for a week, along with an earlier vandal on the same /16. Daniel Case (talk) 22:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite Extended Semi-Protection: Again and Again vandalism by sockpuppets (looks like a sockfarm), the editor Dr. Kaynaat is one of the recent socks of user Jha09. Imsaneikigai (talk) 18:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Dr. Kaynaat (talk · contribs) blocked by Girth Summit. indefinitely as a sock of Cricket Butterfly. Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. IP user(s) ignoring Wikipedia’s Film Guide outline on budgets and disregarding multiple notable sources, opting to say they are all simply wrong about the film’s budget. TropicAces (talk) 19:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)tropicAces
User(s) blocked: 109.79.74.142 (talk · contribs). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Sportsfan 1234: Please explain your reverts in your edit summaries, especially when it's not obviously vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – A lot of disruptive moves and hijacking. ─ Aafī (talk) 20:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Semi-protection until the end of today as the current featured article - TFA Protector Bot seems to be malfunctioning. —a smart kitten[meow] 01:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @A smart kitten: The bot move protected the article, expiring at midnight on 5 February 2024. I remember there was a discussion about preemptively semi-protecting main-page articles but I don't recall how it ended. Can you point to it? Johnuniq (talk) 01:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Khirurg (talk) 02:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: It should be protected just in case it is vandalized 2601:646:8003:6B20:50:C020:FA1A:A438 (talk) 23:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been vandalized many times, and the most recent vandalization was done 19 Days ago. It is possible that more vandalism can appear in this article. As a result, this page should be semi-protected. 2601:646:8003:6B20:50:C020:FA1A:A438 (talk) 00:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 00:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Mass attack at a WP:BLP, all Bangkok IPs. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Liz. Chetsford (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Presistent vandalism by multiple users. See [[23]]. ZombiUwU (💬 ~♥~ 📝) 05:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 90 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The history of protection on this page is not robust enough to escalate it to indefinite. That said, the nature of the vandalism and the fact this is a BLP does warrant special attention. If significant vandalism persists after 90 days of semi-protection ends, please file a new request. Chetsford (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 03:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/2601:240:CD01:C164:0:0:0:0/64. Multiple IPs from the Chicago area. Binksternet (talk) 03:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of content from multiple Vietnams. USSR-Slav (talk) 06:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit-warring to insert inappropriate claims supported by dubious source. DonIago (talk) 06:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP hopper. JimRenge (talk) 08:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/CAM. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandalism resuming within a day of the previous year-long block expiring, this probably needs another year. Belbury (talk) 10:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Repeatedly vandalized. See edit history. ZombiUwU (💬 ~♥~ 📝) 10:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There is an Iraqi user constantly distorted the match's report between Iraq vs Jordan shortly after Iraq lost 2-3 to Jordan to justify that Iraq "won a knockout stage game" in 2015 (7-6 on penalties to Iran after a 3-3 draw), while brazenly rejected the fact that, according from FIFA's knockout laws, when the match headed to penalties, the result is officially counted as a draw, no matter who won on penalties. When we write on this matter, we must respect what FIFA set up for, not by newspaper and propaganda. It's necessary to impose two or three weeks protection to restrict users with intention to distort the reality. HiddenFace101 (talk) 10:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 10:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. If this is just a dispute, why did this user make vandal actions with no respect to those official reports? I only try to recover what it has been set up for. HiddenFace101 (talk) 10:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- HiddenFace101, you've already been told to assume good faith on your talk page, but I will repeat it again here. I do not see any vandalism by the user you are having a disagreement with, and would recommend you read WP:NOTVANDAL. Consider starting a new, more respectful thread at the talk page to discuss these changes. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 10:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. If this is just a dispute, why did this user make vandal actions with no respect to those official reports? I only try to recover what it has been set up for. HiddenFace101 (talk) 10:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content. FromCzech (talk) 13:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Done by Ohnoitsjamie. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chairperson of Sinn Féin, taking office in Northern Ireland. And there was much rejoicing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP for now. Lectonar (talk) 11:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring, Warsaw continues to be added to destination table for Ethiopian Airlines where sources do not mention an exact start date as per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. 2600:1700:8544:D000:ACB6:885E:F00:69C9 (talk) 11:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP doing the edits, spread out over some days now. Lectonar (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: current information spreading racism Themanoffreedom (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Protected because of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan. The article talk-page is not protected, so please us an edit request for any change you might suggest. Lectonar (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Dunno if talk pages can be pending changes protected, but this one should be. Toketaatalk 14:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Unfortunately pending-changes protection isn't available for article talk. Lectonar (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's interesting. Is there a specific technical reasoning as to why, or is it just not an option? I feel as if that would've been a more viable alternative rather than just having the whole thing locked from good faith IPs. 92.40.212.155 (talk) 15:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- You could go through all the different RfCs we had for implementing pending changes protection in the first place, but I think this quote describes it best: For users who aren't banned or otherwise restricted from editing talk pages, a user's talk page comments should never require approval by another user. This includes talk page edits that are vandalizing or otherwise abusive, which should be handled through other extant Wikipedia processes such as reverting the change or banning the user. And indeed: who shall be the judge as to what is acceptable as talk-page contribution? We have multiple ways of dealing with disruption. For all the discussions about the topic, see here. Lectonar (talk) 15:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- IP92, while the talk page is protected, you (and all other good-faith IPs) are welcome to post edit requests at WP:RFED. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's interesting. Is there a specific technical reasoning as to why, or is it just not an option? I feel as if that would've been a more viable alternative rather than just having the whole thing locked from good faith IPs. 92.40.212.155 (talk) 15:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously a now-blocked editor - how *odd* - and now multiple IPs are repeatedly posting POV content about Liston/Marciano/Machen. Can this talk page be temporarily auto-confirmed protected so these socks/meats will probably/possibly get bored and move on?. Shearonink (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Drive by disruptions by IPs (mostly to the lead) and other general disruptions. Asking for a temp PP to dissuade disruptive editing (also suspecting IP socking here). Gotitbro (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent attempts to cirumvent consensus art Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagoo. I protected this myself a while ago, but on second thought am INVOLVED so would appreciate another admin protecting. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit Wars and Disruptive Editing Olek Novy (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting this be logged under enforcement of WP:CTOPS as authorized under WP:ARBEE IanDBeacon (talk) 14:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am not going to make this a CTOPS action for three reasons: first, the disruption broke out only today after a long period of apparently predominantly peaceful editing; second, the article has not had to be protected for over a decade and third, there was no CTOPS-related tagging on the article until I put a notice to that effect on the talk page just now. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection -- disruption from various IPs. 92.40.212.155 (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of ip disruptive editing and nonconstructive edits. Ⓒ𝕝乇тᵉⓇ (α ɯσɾԃ?) 15:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Shadow311 (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Similar to List of Helluva Boss Characters, too many unsourced edits, would semi for a week now and a week after the album drops. Toketaatalk 17:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator BusterD. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new users keep removing properly-sourced content. Subject is currently in the news as she has just become Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland. – Asarlaí (talk) 13:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry, same as Talk:Lethal Miniature Aerial Missile System above. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @BusterD: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruption. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Very long protection log. BusterD (talk) 20:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator BusterD. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts from multiple IPs to add OVERLINKs. Already reverted by multiple editors. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism against WP:Airports Der HON (talk) 19:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism against WP:Airports Der HON (talk) 19:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
06 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 23:07, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary protection of some kind due to high IP and new user vandalism following community response to high-profile controversy. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 22:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 23:07, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Not a lot of vandalism. Bring it down to semi-protection for a month and see what happens. Ccole2006 (talk) 20:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected We already know what will happen. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean? Ccole2006 (talk) 20:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. See edit history. [24] [25] [26] ZombiUwU (💬 ~♥~ 📝) 20:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This article has been overwhelmed by vandalism over the past 3 or days. I'm only asking for one month of semi-protection please. However, given the absolute absurdity of the recent edits; full protection may be in order. 2600:1000:B10D:8F37:5CDF:2037:8729:CC79 (talk) 21:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The activity was limited to two editors, one now blocked the other given a final warning on their talk. Aoidh (talk) 23:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits and vandalism. Xoruz (talk) 22:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protect. Persistent IP vandal using at least two IPs, obsessively deleting a reliable source [27][28][29][30][31] cited for a specific fact (which says precisely that fact: "the Falkirk tartan dates to the third century"). Claims their being reverted is "vandalism". This needs to stop. Latest edit injected their own unsourced personal opinion about what a "true" tartan is, and added redundant material in the wrong section. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 194.73.217.219 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Two IPs and newly created account edit warring on article: [32][33][34] Qiushufang (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 range blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Semi-frequent target of spam and other disruptive edits. Edits from non-autoconfirmed users could benefit from review. MaterialsPsych (talk) 03:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it helps, it can be extended at that time. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 04:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Senator Paul isn't in the news that much. Furthermore, this page has been on indefinite semi-protection for 13.5 years now. I respectfully believe that enough time has passed. 2600:1000:B10D:8F37:8563:A671:DB24:E817 (talk) 00:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined No valid reason given to unprotect this BLP. He's been a polarizing figure in the past, and this is an election year (but not for him), and anonymous edits are still possible via requests on the talk page. As I don't see any such requests in over a year, the burden isn't high. Dennis Brown 2¢ 00:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 02:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 07:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:DE by IP editors. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 07:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Trying to create a new article, please make page editable, thank you! Seattleretroguy (talk) 23:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. You'll be able to create the article once your account has been around for four days and you've made ten edits. In the meantime, you could create a draft at Draft:Portland Retro Gaming Expo. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:33, 5 February 2024 (UT
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Tymjax (talk) 02:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC) loved Y’all
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done @Tymjax: This report (and the one below) appears to have been made in error. Aoidh (talk) 04:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Tymjax (talk) 02:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC) Expand By Tymirieyakious Elais Quayvon Jackson Loved All Infinite Campus Was A Great Learning System.
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done Aoidh (talk) 04:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dennis Brown 2¢ 07:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Removal of childhood films and sourced mixed ancestry. DareshMohan (talk) 06:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dennis Brown 2¢ 07:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – vandalism over role in legislation. Will120 (talk) 07:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent try for unsourced update. Same case as on Lukáš Kalvach, which acquired page protection yesterday. FromCzech (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A vandal tried replacing the lead infobox image. StewieGriffin&EricCartman (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent drive-by vandalism. ~Liancetalk 19:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What purpose does that page in userspace serve? I get that it's a meme, but why do we need to host it in Wikipedia in the first place? OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'd enjoy reading an answer to Ohnoitsjamie's question. User:Liance, should an encyclopedia host such content? BusterD (talk) 20:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ohnoitsjamie BusterD I had assumed it would fall under WP:HUMOR/WP:FUN - I've hosted numerous similar, harmless "meme" userboxes and content with hundreds of transclusions without having an issue raised in the past. In the near-decade I've been active I haven't been challenged for something like this that stays strictly in the userspace. I typically avoid creating trivial content, but I fail to see how WP:WEBHOST would apply in this case. If there's a policy or guideline that I'm violating and wasn't aware of, please do let me know. ~Liancetalk 23:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced it serves a useful purpose here, and am not interested in setting a precedent of protecting userspace memes. I'll leave it open in case there is an admin who thinks that is worth protecting.OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Quite frankly I don't see the difference between protecting this page and any other user page. I see plenty of sub-userpages with protection in Special:ProtectedPages which could be considered to have the same level of "utility" (or, lack thereof) to the overarching project. This includes numerous pages under the "humor" umbrella. Does this mean that my page should be the subject of vandalism attempts because it's a "meme"? What makes it worth protecting less than any other userspace page? I apologize but I don't see the argument here. ~Liancetalk 23:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie Per policy, I'm inclined to protect (given semi-protetion of userpages is pretty much automatic) and then encourage an MFD if someone doesn't think it should be here. I think the response to this request should either be semi-protection or deletion, and outside calling a U5 (which this isn't) deletion doesn't happen here. Courcelles (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, the reason this can't be considered for a U5 is because that criteria only covers userspaces of users "where the owner has made few or no edits outside of user pages". That clearly doesn't cover @Liance with 7,000 mainspace edits. Courcelles (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie Per policy, I'm inclined to protect (given semi-protetion of userpages is pretty much automatic) and then encourage an MFD if someone doesn't think it should be here. I think the response to this request should either be semi-protection or deletion, and outside calling a U5 (which this isn't) deletion doesn't happen here. Courcelles (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Quite frankly I don't see the difference between protecting this page and any other user page. I see plenty of sub-userpages with protection in Special:ProtectedPages which could be considered to have the same level of "utility" (or, lack thereof) to the overarching project. This includes numerous pages under the "humor" umbrella. Does this mean that my page should be the subject of vandalism attempts because it's a "meme"? What makes it worth protecting less than any other userspace page? I apologize but I don't see the argument here. ~Liancetalk 23:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. In line with my comment above. I'm not sure how I would !vote in an MFD, but that's where the "should we have this page hosted" question belongs. As an RFPP matter, it qualifies for protection as there is disruption. Courcelles (talk) 14:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. Huge target of Gen Alpha and school kids. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of IP vandalism. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. It's all coming from a single /64, though. Courcelles (talk) 16:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary Semi-Protection: Systematic unsourced spam by IPs and refusal of adding any sources. Fragrant Peony (talk) 05:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The article belongs to one of the politicians, who has had a controversial past with significant involvement in the Ayodhya dispute. Recent news events such as Ram Mandir opening in Ayodhya and awarding of Bharat Ratna has brought him into the spot light. There are quite of number of ip edits, edits by non-confirmed users and socks of the same user trying to make changes to the lead, repeat points already mentioned and making POV edits. Most recent edits have come from a single user or his socks, who despite explaining in detail in the talk page and warning multiple times is making the same edits. The user account pertains to the particular user User:The Invincible 000000 and now same edits from different ip address post warning (last edit of the same from IP User:2001:1c04:2a08:a00:d828:d230:6206:d438). As the article is a biography with links to controversial subjects concerned with religion in India, request protection with edits restricted to extended confirmed users. Thanks. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 09:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced information by an IP editor. Tacyarg (talk) 09:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection isn't needed for issues with single IPs. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. BangJan1999 17:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. as GENSEX enforcement. Courcelles (talk) 18:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More edit wars. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 14:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Tedmcbur (talk) 16:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 162.230.153.33 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ingenuity. Favonian (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One(!) disruptive edit so far in 2024. Favonian (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Further sockpuppets of user Jaszen have turned up. They've been reported to SPI but in the meantime, requesting further page proection. Barry Wom (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Page needs protection from this user. They keep vandalizing without reason 70.123.57.204 (talk) 18:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement. Ccole2006 (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Extensive IP vandalism and nationalistic editing against consensus and without using the talk page. Additional notes inserted into text requesting discussion at talk page has been constantly deleted. Requesting semi-protection. Requesting the same for page Wan Kuzain. Jay eyem (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wan Kuzain
Semi-protected indefinitely.; will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wan Kuzain
Reason: Sockpuppet continues to make new accounts to vandalize after last PP expired. oncamera (talk page) 20:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This is a stopgap template, until such time as the 'graph' module issue is resolved. This version of Template:OSM Location map/core is the temporary re-working which produces 'better than nothing' maps using maplink instead of the vastly more flexible 'graph' options. It needs some maintenance, given the glacial rate of progress with the proper fix. In particular I need to sort out start numbers and increase the number of marks back to 60. This will be vastly easier if I can do proper editing. It was protected by User:MusikBot II/TemplateProtector because it is seemingly
- too important to allow people to edit
- but not important enough for WMF to sort out the underlying problem.
If it can be made editable for a while that would be extremely useful. Thanks, RobinLeicester (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined. @RobinLeicester: Instead, I have examined your contribution history in the template namespace and decided that you can be trusted with the "template editor" user right. Congratulations, you may now edit this and other similarly protected templates. Be sure to test changes to high-risk templates in their respective sandboxes. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
07 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by an IP. Sports2021 (talk) 12:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 179.67.251.101 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Tedmcbur (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 18:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- 216.197.204.76 should also probably blocked for persistent vandalism... LegalSmeagolian (talk) 19:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 216.197.204.76 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 19:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because already it’s three year as per the log.There was no major sock activity.Mainly the normal user like me feel difficult as discuss page is somewhat inactive.For ex:SayhadrikhandaCurrently I edited this page with high end resource with the collaboration of Administrator but the same research is applicable in this page too but unable to update the information.Incase if any sock active persists it takes 2 minutes to increase the level of protection.I request you to remove the protection(Atleast reduce the protection) so that all can contribute towards free encyclopaedia. 2409:40F2:1017:84C3:5C75:D209:11A1:6B02 (talk) 19:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Gaud Saraswat Brahmin is not protected. Favonian (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism - IP Accounts keep changing the page to mention a light up drone show which is currently called "Disney's Electrical Sky Parade". Despite this being a drone show that serves as a tribute to the Main Street Electrical Parade, I feel like this page is not the right place to mention it Pepper Gaming (talk) 19:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. They haven't made those edits in 10 days. Also, this sounds like a content dispute that could at least bear an attempt to resolve it on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism by multiple IP's. At least five counts of vandalism in the last several days Gwillhickers (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 04:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 22:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Joyous! Noise! 04:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent BLP violations. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 02:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Joyous! Noise! 04:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please stop this LTA for a bit please. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 02:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Joyous! Noise! 04:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple LTA accounts attacking this user. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 02:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I actually feel really bad for him. What did he do to make these editors attack and start rambling? NoobThreePointOh (talk) 02:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- He did nothing (I should have said that in my previous message). NoobThreePointOh (talk) 02:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Joyous! Noise! 04:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Joyous! Noise! 04:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – anon IP repeatedly posting innuendo about topic of article, insisting it be added to article. I've tried reasoning with anon, to no avail. his edits should also be stricken from the page history. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 04:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- To be clear, I only suggest anon IP be blocked from editing the article and talk page discussed. Anon says they're going to take it to dispute resolution, I see no reason to block anon's ability to do so. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 04:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- If you're only suggesting the IP range be blocked, this isn't the appropriate location. 92.40.212.156 (talk) 07:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- This seems to be a dispute on what content to include, and not disruption. And even if it was, extended confirmed protection is unnecessary and higher than the actual article's protection itself. Also, informing them that they'll be blocked shortly is hardly an attempt at
"reasoning with the anon"
. 92.40.212.156 (talk) 07:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Declined per above discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello? Anyone? The page genuinely needs protection, and anon-ip's inclusions of guilt-by-association and conspiracy theories needs to be removed per WP:BLPTALK, or am I missing some particular nuance? I acknowledge my previous comments were inadequate; the initial request is valid, his edits on talk are blp-talk violations. The other anon-IP who chimed in on this is not the IP that was in question; There's been no discussion with that identity on the blp talk page. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 02:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I apologize for my lack of clarity. It is extremely rare for me to make formal requests on wikipedia. I've been here a long time, and avoid the backend bureaucratic machinations as much as possible - to the point that I am ignorant about how many of them work. I was indeed asking for page protection on the Dan Quayle talk page, because the anon-IP is trafficking in serious BLP violative conspiracy theories. Editors other than myself have deleted his additions to the page because they violate talk-blp. I attempted to engage with anon-IP, to no avail. IP 92.40.212.156, ignoring my attempts prior to my notifying him that he would be blocked shortly isn't really good-faith. I notified him of same so that he'd be aware that the window of opportunity for responding was limited.
- I thought I had selected the correct path - page protection due to talk-blp violations. I wasn't aware that I had selected disruptive editing. Or didn't I? I don't know, but I do know that I did not request that the IP or the IP range be blocked, I simply misspoke in my followup (again, forced-ignorance of these processes). My apologies for the confusion I generated. I still maintain that anon-ip's contributions to the talk page are clearly violative of talk-blp, as other editors have also shown by their reversions. Do I need to resubmit the request for page protection? cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Years-long pattern of promotional and unconstructive edits, primarily by unregistered users, that are repeatedly reverted Etoile ✩ (talk) 22:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 04:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. PicoMath (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because has gone years after protected and there are a lot of old information, it can be updated page with new informations Illyrianzz (talk) 22:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. @Illyrianzz: You evidently did not read the instructions above. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Unprotection: It was fully protected back in 2008, because there's apparently "no reason to move or edit redirect without discussion". It has never been subjected to vandalism or any major content dispute, so this seems a bit overkill. And BTW, Charles, Prince of Wales isn't protected at all. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 23:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Why would you want to edit a redirect that points to a high-profile BLP? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 03:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. The times this redirect has been edited has been the result of discussion. Therefore the protection is working as intended. No valid reason has been given to reduce protection of this redirect. It hasn't been subject to vandalism because it is protected. It's a short, often-used term for the target article, more so than Charles, Prince of Wales, which is a less plausible search term than Prince Charles. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. over the past month, the have been several incidents of disruptive/false editing. Avishai11 (talk) 20:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Disruption not that heavy. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There has been only one disruptive edit in a week. Joyous! Noise! 04:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blue Barette Bam's disruption happening over again. – 64andtim (talk) 00:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayCubby plz edit my user pg! Talk 02:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey Administrator, I am Shivam, a beginner editor at Wikipedia. I want to create a page related to the Myanmar Air Force's airbases. Could you help me to create? I will add only information and relevant content related to that are available in public domain. Shivam Kumar 2406 (talk) 07:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done because there is nothing to do, there is no protection on that page title. @Shivam Kumar 2406: As a new editor, you cannot yet create articles in article space. Create a draft instead. See Help:Your first article and Wikipedia:Articles for creation for guidance on creating a draft for more experienced editors to review before it is published in article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from various users; claiming that the series has been cancelled, according to one of the show's stars. However, actors do not speak for the fate of a show, and no official word has been made yet. Unless temporary protection is added, this kind of editing from others will continue. BrickMaster02 (talk) 22:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IPs & Mobile editors vandalizing the 'owners' section of the infobox GoodDay (talk) 06:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Has been protected for years and vandalism resumed after expiry. I think it should get indefinite now. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR TylerBurden (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/RUSUKR. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Despite a comment in the source (which itself was removed each time), in the past month alone edits like this have been made on seven occasions and reverted by three editors (including me), including twice in the last couple of hours. A relevant discussion is at Talk:Oscar Isaac#Nationality. Largoplazo (talk) 22:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism as well as poorly-sourced changes based on a hiring rumor, requesting semi-protection ECP (confirmed users are involved now) for perhaps a week given how long the hiring process for coaches seems to be taking this year. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Hey man im josh. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of multiple IP-s disruptive editing with biased agenda, WP:EDITWARRING; WP:SPA; WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. Jingiby (talk) 04:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP the last 2 days, and has stopped after last warning. Lectonar (talk) 11:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Moderate to high level of ip vandalism and nonconstructive edits constantly being reverted 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 04:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – It would appear two people are having an edit war. Neither have proposed moving to the talk page and both are users anonymous users. N7o2h3 (talk) 04:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Seems to have stopped for; please relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 11:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Expecting disruptive edits after selection of Israeli artist Pdhadam (talk) 07:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of Ip vandalism Smadur1997 (talk) 00:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Smadur1997: Did you mean your userpage? That hasn't been vandalised; see also this. Lectonar (talk) 08:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. See above comment. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – back after latest protection. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 05:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Dieter Lloyd Wexler: Please continue to leave explanations and notices, especially for IP users that may not seem user talk page notices as often. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent and serious WP:BLP violations by IP hopping editor. Kathleen's bike (talk) 14:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. CT/TT, NEWBLPBAN, whichever. Courcelles (talk) 15:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also WP:GENSEX. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 15:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. and logged. Courcelles (talk) 15:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring from IP addresses about the phrase "climate denial". Panian513 15:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 15:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given this issue caused protection not that long ago, as well. Courcelles (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of repeated IP vandalism Anwegmann (talk) 16:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 14:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This will keep happening at least through the elections. Courcelles (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs edit-warring to change a cited figure against consensus. Jfire (talk) 17:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Long-term sockpuppetry.[35][36][37] Skitash (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and edit warring over same. Slatersteven (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Please report to wp:aiv if the problem continues, if it is the same user over and over again. A userblock is preferable to page protection when possible. 15:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Joyous! Noise!
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon performing multiple vandal-edits. Shearonink (talk) 14:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Please report problems involving a single IP to WP:AIV. Joyous! Noise! 15:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Disruption by (auto)confirmed users. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 15:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Joyous! Noise! 15:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism after page got unprotected. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 17:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism from new/IP users Shaws username (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is disrupted by adding unsourced pov and content removal on regular intervals. It necessitates the ECP protection. Admantine123 (talk) 18:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:GS/CASTE. Favonian (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
08 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs probably only a month or so of protection as certain right wingers are upset regarding this members vote regarding an impeachment of a Biden official. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ARBAP2 enforcement should be considered. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have not put this under CTOPS due to the length of time; although I will put a notice on the talk page. We'll see how it goes later on. Daniel Case (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Non-autoconfirmed accounts have been spamming links to various sites over the past month or so. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 16:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 17:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content and vandalism by IPs after prior protection expired. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure why the sudden interest but request a couple days or so protection. S0091 (talk) 22:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing that has turned the page into a battleground. The page was last protected back on 19 August 2022 due to an almost identical issue. However, the follow up semi-protection status hasn't stemmed disruptive editing. ElderZamzam (talk) 22:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – GENSEX arbitration enforcement. GnocchiFan (talk) 20:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to recent Twitter trade announcement. Esolo5002 (talk) 21:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 23:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. Same LTA again – 64andtim (talk) 23:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 19:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2A0A:A546:F81A:0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For one week. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated insertion of an unrelated promotional link into the External Links section by several IPs and one user account. GraziePrego (talk) 23:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @GraziePrego: It also may be worth submitting a request to get the link added to the spam blacklist. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent BLP violations Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and placed some blocks. If that doesn't do it it can be raised to ecp. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topic related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. ARBPIA. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- And also WP:ARBIRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS under both topics. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Under alot of vandalism in the past few days due to recent controversies in the corporation, with alot of edits labeling the corporation as a Black company without any credible sources. Anime King (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 174.228.128.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. Not seeing enough disruption to warrant protection on top of that. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Added CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Live updates. Or stop user 213.110.126.122 doing that after having been warned multiple times. Island92 (talk) 21:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined The user has stopped. As I said at AIV, they need to be warned more. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Constant disruptive editing by IPs over many months. GraziePrego (talk) 23:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Almost no editing in the last 24 hours. But I have put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. copyvio issues Geardona (talk to me?) 01:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined The copyvio issues appear to have been resolved, and the article was just created today. I have created a talk page with a CTOPS notice. Let's see how things play out. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Also apparent sock puppetry to reinstate unsourced content. Possible WP:COI issues too. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 04:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Looks like vandalism whereby I have described the person as a 'public intellectual' citing sources and an editor has been changing it to 'author'; that Wikipedia account appears created specifically to work on this Wiki page. AltruisticHomoSapien (talk) 05:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined as this isn't vandalism, it is a content dispute. It needs to go to the talk page of the article. Dennis Brown 2¢ 06:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs changing birthdate against sourcing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR Ccole2006 (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I feel like this is stretching even the definition of "broadly construed", but okay. Anyone should feel free to revert this if you disagree. Chetsford (talk) 06:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been semiprotected for fifteen years. Could you downgrade it to pending changes and see how that goes? The protecting administrator hasn't edited in almost a month. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 04:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Done. The request is reasonable. Now pending-change protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 10:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Recent change by a user that WP:GAME'd the system to raise to autoconfirmed status to make large swathing change instead of following process and raising an edit request. Request increased PP per WP:GENSEX arbitration for contentious topic to avoid this happening again. Raladic (talk) 07:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I don't do ECPs often so if there is any special place this needs to be logged, I would be grateful if you would do so on my behalf. Stifle (talk) 09:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- It is logged by a bot at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Pages recently put under extended-confirmed protection. That is all that is required. Yaris678 (talk) 09:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Redirected by multiple Indian IPs that have continued intermittently. USSR-Slav (talk) 09:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 09:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page seems to be a perpetual magnet for vandalism. Endwise (talk) 09:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been protected so many times, it doesn't make sense to keep using short periods. Dennis Brown 2¢ 09:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Photocredits are not correct of first photo. It is not JD Cairns who took the photo but it is me: Too van Velzen. And it is not for free use. It may only used by AUMC and VU Amsterdam. I will allow the presence of this photo on this site but the photocredits must be changed ASAP!!! 2A02:A467:905F:1:FD:75F8:1DFF:CC3 (talk) 12:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is something that must be addressed on Commons (Wikipedia proper does not host it), because if what you say is true than (1) the image was uploaded under false pretenses and (2) Commons does not host fair-use images. Either of which is grounds for it to be deleted outright, not re-attributed. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 14:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- I found a cropped version of this photograph on someone's LinkedIn profile: [38] - the clouds and bicyclist are the same. An administrator has already tagged the photo on Commons with missing permission, and I notified that administrator of this comment here. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- The image has been tagged as missing permission and will be deleted on 12 February if permission isn't received. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Nothing more to do at our end. Favonian (talk) 10:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Please mark this article as a semi-protected article. The page has been vandalized multiple times in recent times.
Instances this week:
- Correction: Removal of a random youtube channel url added Waonderer (talk) 09:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. "Vandalism" is defined as edits specifically to undermine the encyclopedia. The one time removal of information was likely bias. The other link was you correcting the insertion of a youtube video, but that was probably not vandalism, might have been added in good faith for all I know, but I didn't go digging into the history to see where it was added. Regardless, there isn't enough recent vandalism, or disruption, to warrant protecting the article. Dennis Brown 2¢ 09:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced changes to aircraft role. ZLEA T\C 15:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There's been a spate of edits from IPs adding false information to this BLP over the last five days. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ohnoitsjamie. Berig (talk) 16:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hasan muntaseer (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Berig (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Shadow311 (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
~~* 2024 SAFF U-19 Women's Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Lots of IP vandalism in the last 30 minutes alone due to controversial finish to a match. Update: This can be removed, it slipped my mind to check if a request had already been made. Thank you! Yoblyblob (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)~~
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent BLP violations, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nothing but reverts for the last month. Nswix (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I requested page protection two days ago and was told to watch it in case edit warring continued. Sadly it has. Appears to be two IP users who wont use the talk page. N7o2h3 (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 17:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 18:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – EDIT WARRING!!!!1!. JayCubby plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- or could someone revoke talk page access? JayCubby plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by RickinBaltimore. Favonian (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP and SPA editing, including both linkspam and biblical literalist edit warring, with possible IP hopping. Orchastrattor (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Already protected in the past for the same reason, disruptive editing restarted as soon as protection expired. Broc (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This needs semi-protection from IPs changing the subject's nationality; if they feel thusly inclined, they can take it up on the talk page. I'd do it myself but I'm about to block a regular account for that kind of edit warring, and I'd rather have someone else look at it. There's probably a dozen, maybe two dozen such IP edits in the recent history, and lengthy semi-protection would be a good thing. Drmies (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. And will log at CTOPS ("Nationality of natives of the British Isles" is clearly a particularly contentious subtopic of BLP. Not the first time I've had to do this). Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing, including by Piermark. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Berig (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced changes to aircraft role. ZLEA T\C 15:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Berig (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced changes to aircraft role. ZLEA T\C 15:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Berig (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced changes to aircraft role. ZLEA T\C 15:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Berig (talk) 16:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated invalid requests for speedy deletion. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. University rating score continuously changed to "A++" by different IPs despite the source cited. Synorem (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Respected sir.,
I like to inform you the information given in article that make to completely show down our lodhi caste. information in this article is not proper about lodhi caste , my whole community feel very disappointed, frustrated with this,
so please sir remove protection from this article and we add true data of lodhi caste with proper reliable resources..
thanks you sir., hope you under stand 2409:40D2:1032:E545:3539:E24D:7AC5:E0E6 (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Ponyobons mots 18:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP casualty count disruption came right back after protection expired. CutlassCiera 14:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- It also appears that the disruption has spread to several other Iraq War articles, with 37.237.25.12 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) causing a lot of this disruption. This vandal is known to hop IPs. CutlassCiera 14:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit from that IP was two days ago, and that was the only one in the last couple of months. AN/I might be a better place to take this report if the idea is to blunt the IP's actions. Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Basudevbiju (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Fake editors give wrong information
- Automated comment: @Basudevbiju: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Minimal edits in the last couple of months. I have nonetheless put a CTOPS notice on the talk page, though. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Pov-pushing, breaching 1RR-rule. See: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Margaret Sanger and Talk:Margaret Sanger#Eugenics should be mentioned in the very beginning of the article's lead; neutrality dispute.. The Banner talk 19:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated removals by dynamic IP who refuses to discuss on talk page. Skyerise (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruption, long term warring over poorly sourced notables lists. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Unprotection: No need for protection, there is a productive new user working, and have been minimal to no issues. Geardona (talk to me?) 19:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Unprotected Admin who made the protection has been dead for almost 6 years; and it seems from your talk page conversation with the new user that they're editing constructively. Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
09 February 2024
Reason: Page protection is requested for the Wikipedia article on the Indian National Lok Dal due to biased edits without sources, which compromise neutrality and factual accuracy. Ah507 (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have put a CTOPS notice on the talk page, though. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. BangJan1999 19:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Crisp died in 1999; BLP (and for that matter BRDP) stopped applying a long time ago. Daniel Case (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated changes by mostly IP accounts, adding false information or editing already verified information. Madyoshi01 (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Stifle (talk) 09:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, unlikely to stop, GENSEX arbitration enforcement. GnocchiFan (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 11:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Although not as frequently, this article also suffers from the same problem as Pixar's: accounts writing incorrect, unsourced information or modifying already verified information. Madyoshi01 (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- It appears so, my apologies. Madyoshi01 (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- :
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- :
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2409:4063:8E93:A20B:F48D:8D43:3465:D3D0 (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 07:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 11:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 11:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Several accounts (IP or registered) from the same sockpuppet/vandal user has been attacking my talk page with verbal insults and/or death threats. PJ Santos (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 11:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple recent instances of vandalism which were not quickly reverted. Brad (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Ayzkao (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Change the information about TETChange. This information is ABSOLUTELY FALSE!!!!!! "Notable businesses include Garantex,[201] Eggchange, Cashbank, Buy-Bitcoin, Tetchange, Bitzlato, and Suex, which was sanctioned by the U.S. in 2021. Bitzlato founder and owner Anatoly Legkodymov was arrested following money-laundering charges by the United States Department of Justice.[202]"
We are a licensed Public Ogranisation, which has no sanctions. We aren't associated with the U.S. at all. In fact, we have branches in Armenia/Yerevan, Russia/Moscow, Tbili&Batumi/Georgia. We kindly ask you to remove the information about our company and stop misleading people and potential customers into doubting our trustworthiness and reliability, since we have always worked with pure honesty and 100% legally. Thank you in advance, hope to see this part removed.
Best Regards, TETChange ORG.
TETChange E-Money & Crypto Exchange (talk) 09:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done, user softblocked for username violation. Dennis Brown 2¢ 09:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism, adding uncited information regarding prize money with no evidence. Semi-protection requested. Jay eyem (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR Ccole2006 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Berig (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Editwar about "Filipina" in lead. While MOS:PHILIPPINES states that "Filipina is used when referring to women", a discussion stated that Filipino is the preferred adjectival usage in English, for all genders, per Pseud 14. RMXY (talk • contribs) 11:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Last edit in the "edit-war" was two days ago...the last edit summary seems to have nailed it: "The discussion refers to a similar a FA BLP, and all of which retain the neutral form. Having undergone a consensus driven process through FAC have found this to be acceptable". Lectonar (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from various IP addresses and new accounts - based upon the edit history, this has been going for around year. Panian513 00:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New IPs and accounts blanking parts of the article, might need extended-confirmed protection instead due to WP:RUSUKR seeing as the disruption is over ethnonationalist disputes. Mellk (talk) 00:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as a RUSUKR GS action. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the draft is good enough to be published. RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- @RIDHVAN SHARMA: the draft isn't protected, so cannot be unprotected. Did you want to submit it for review? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- The target article (Allen Career Institute) is protected due to repeated recreations. @RIDHVAN SHARMA:, you need to submit the draft for review, and if it's approved the protection can be removed to allow a WP:AFC reviewier to move the draft to article space.-- Ponyobons mots 18:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I want to submit it for review. RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 05:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Let the review run its course first. Lectonar (talk) 12:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing during the month of February. Different IP editors adding unsourced content that Tomasson has left his club. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Page under ARBPIA sanctions. — kashmīrī TALK 18:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic, related to the Arab-Israeli conflict Ccole2006 (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir.; semi has three days more to go. I added a CTOPS notice to the many on the talk page (Frankly, AP is more appropriate). Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits and sourced content removal. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 07:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And logged at WP:GS/ISIL. Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from various IP addresses and recently created accounts, changing BLP of the person in question, removing sourced contents and adding unsourced contents and misinformation. HistorianDele (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations, including by auto-confirmed accounts, resuming about a week after prior protection expired and re-occurring frequently since then. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring by sock. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. Also, requesting page protection for Randy Blythe for the same reason. HorrorLover555 (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Kinu. For a month. I have also blocked both socks after an AIV report. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced material. — Czello (music) 09:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Subject of WP:GSCASTE, repeated disruptive editing in last 30 days. DreamRimmer (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged appropriately. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism from multiple different IP addresses. Panian513 13:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Yaris678. for three years. Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Annual spate of vandalism as the Chinese New Year rolls around. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)t I
- That was a bit quick of the mark Cyberbot I. I only just protected it. Yaris678 (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Done. Confirming for the bots. Yaris678 (talk) 22:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has been the subject of persistent disruptive editing over the past 24 hours by three different users. Possible sockpuppetry. Johnnie Bob (talk) 14:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Edit warring Adakiko (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Aoidh.... and already listed, above. Yaris678 (talk) 22:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 21:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
10 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large spate of BLP violations by IPs in the last 24 hours. Possibly related to the Pakistani elections. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Second this, currently several instances of vandalism per minute! Arcendeight (talk) 14:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- +1 just look at the edit history. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] 17:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Another vote in favour – quite serious WP:BLP violations taking place on an article about someone in the news. 81.187.192.168 (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- The amount of vandalism in that article is something I've never seen before. ''Flux55'' (talk) 17:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed. 17:37, 9 February 2024 - EvergreenFir protected Attaullah Tarar [Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 17:37, 11 February 2024) (Persistent vandalism). 81.187.192.168 (talk) 18:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced content, by a registered user and their sock puppet, both now blocked, by an IP user adding the same content, also now blocked, and just now by another IP user - same content again. Tacyarg (talk) 22:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 23:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit-warring regarding whether to make page a redirect or not. Panian513 23:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Dennis Brown 2¢ 23:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Results for 2024 Pakistani general election is being announced among allegations of rigging and as he leads Election Commission of Pakistan, his page is being vandalized. Muneebll (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Prodraxis (talk) 18:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 84.15.180.6 (talk · contribs) blocked by Fuzheado. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there is no edit war. Kishan82 (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Page wasn't protected for edit-warring but for sockpuppetry. Lectonar (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- so why there is no expiry date for that protection? Kishan82 (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Because sockpuppetteers are known to "wait out" protection periods to attack the article again. Leaving an article protected will either force them to stop going after it or waste time setting up accounts to bypass it (thus making them more obvious to any passing administrators or Checkusers). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 18:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- OP has been checkuser blocked.-- Ponyobons mots 20:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Because sockpuppetteers are known to "wait out" protection periods to attack the article again. Leaving an article protected will either force them to stop going after it or waste time setting up accounts to bypass it (thus making them more obvious to any passing administrators or Checkusers). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 18:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- so why there is no expiry date for that protection? Kishan82 (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. Brachy08 (Talk) 15:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Recently today, an IP user vandalised Just Dance 2022 with his sense of humor. Also today, another IP user added his original research about to both articles its "alternate name". I want to bring this to light because of the history of both articles being vandalised by IPs and new users. (2022 having someone add a CupcakKe song, and 2023 Edition having someone add random songs)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 19:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Longstanding and repeated IP vandalism attempts. Amigao (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The company responsible for the tournament has repeatedly attempted to edit-war in a 27000+ byte list of every winner of every variant of the tournament, which numerous editors including myself have labelled as advertising, violating WP:NOTWEBHOST
([39]), and Wikipedia [being] not an appropriate place for these lists
([40]). Despite this, they have tried to force it in under
- User:DMC Canada ([41] + [42]) (blocked for promotional username),
- User:Turntable Whisperer ([43]) (blocked for advertising-only account),
- 2607:fea8:1023:be00:e065:98a3:f1e2:356c ([44]),
- 209.171.85.6 ([45]), and
- 2607:fea8:1023:be00:549:855f:1933:a0cb ([46]),
plus 2001:56b:3ff1:1f4d:c499:c323:8671:c49b left me a nice personal attack on the article's AfD page ([47]). The fact that they used both static and dynamic IPs makes me think a simple range-block won't fix it, so I'd like to request protection. Ideally I'd prefer ECP--I can absolutely see the company making ten dummy edits just to resume edit-warring again, and I won't be able to revert them at that point--but even semiprotection would be better than nothing. 2603:8001:4542:28FB:2DC0:9C2E:6D19:E08D (talk) 23:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC) (Send talk messages here instead)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – some vandalism due to football things that happened today. Probably die down in a few days. Gricehead (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 01:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism from IPs, new accounts. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 19:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Perhaps they will try to talk it out. Moxy- 23:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Aoidh (talk) 01:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: That company has repeatedly attempted to edit-war in a 27000+ byte list of every winner of every variant of DMC World DJ Championships into that article, which I already requested protection for above. If that does get protected, I will bet everyone here 50 cents that they'll start targeting their own article too if they're still able to edit it. 2603:8001:4542:28FB:2DC0:9C2E:6D19:E08D (talk) 23:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC) (Send talk messages here instead)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism [48], ongoing event that is politically polarizing. Plumeater2 (talk) 20:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have created the talk page with CTOPS notice. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Multiple instances of anon editors changing pronouns and adding transphobic content. ZombiUwU (💬 ~♥~ 📝) 02:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 02:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Atelier Sophie 2: The Alchemist of the Mysterious Dream (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was protected for two months and the vandalism picked up again a day after protection expired. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. For a year. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP editors keep changing his team/job title despite being reverted even though the coaching hire is still not official/hasn't been announced by the team. -- ZooBlazer 02:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing - Some IPs of Filipino origin put again and change the dual nationality of this actress both in the short description and in the initial sentence at the point where it is described and persist in changing partner in the infobox, her personal life. 190.167.41.207 (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Put CTOPS notice on talk page as well. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was protected for the same reason till February 8, 2024. Request page protection for one month. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 04:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism, removing properly sources reg important dual citizenship without leaving any comments or reasoning. Singularitywiki (talk) 14:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- IP user also has a history of editing and removing without rs or replying to talk pages. Request 1 week protection. Singularitywiki (talk) 14:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, seems no recent activity. Will do. Singularitywiki (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IPs edit warring over the infobox description of this pastry. Belbury (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Already unprotected by administrator Aoidh.. Confirming for bot. Yaris678 (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Idiosincrático (talk) 01:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vandalism recently reverted was last month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP disruption, including misuse of edit requests. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 05:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Hiring rumors are leading to many poorly-sourced and unsourced edits as well as some vandalism. Please protect it for several days or a week. There was one autoconfirmed editor involved who has been warned multiple times about this recently (and I warned them again), but semi-protection might be enough here. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent inclusion of RD2 materials. — 🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔 • 📝) 10:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 11:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting lots of vandalism edits.... assuming because he's in the news this week. Moxy- 05:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Appears to be a single editor. I have issued a first caution. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vysoká úroveň IP vandalismu - dodání odstavce o falešné sestře, protože aktérka zdravotní sestra prokazatelně je a má v ruce i diplom o dalším vzdělání. Odstavec o kauze falešné sestry by měl být smazaný, protože je to vysoce manipulativní odstavec, nikde Petra Rédová neprohlásila,že je sestra z brněnské JIP, je zdravotní sestra na JIP v Anglii a to naprosto prokazatelně. Někdo do článku dává záměrné dezinformace, které aktérku poškozují. Důkazy má v rukou i její právník, který tyto manipulace sleduje. 89.176.123.5 (talk) 09:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Administrators on en.wp cannot protect pages on cz.wp. Ask at that wiki's equivalent of this page. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 09:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined as above. – robertsky (talk) 11:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Please notify tails I nominated their article June 2021 North American storm complex for merging 108.58.71.234 (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am aware of the merge discussion and have responded to it. Thus, notifying isn't necessary now. ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 16:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism of users, changing or misspelling official sources infos. Uterimemo (talk) 14:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Uterimemo: The page is already semi-protected. Ss112 14:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Sinclairian (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has returned yet again and editors just continuously have to revert it - can we finally set an indefinite protection for this article instead of this going on back and forth repeatedly?. Raladic (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple instances of vandalism perhaps inspired by her recent social media activity Matuko (talk) 18:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
This page clearly violates Wikipedia's "purpose of Wikipedia" and "neutral point of view policy." I can see why this page is classified as a "contentious topic page." The subject matter of this page is a historical event of legislation which it should be about, instead it reads as the ramblings of a liberal political activist. It is rife with a cacophony of political bias and ideological beliefs all backed up with a boatload of unscientific political opinion articles as "sources," which themselves have no sources. This "encyclopedic" account of historical legislation is completely lacking in any form of objectivity. There is no question what the "protected author's" beliefs and political opinions are. I believe this entire article should be scrapped and built from the ground up by people who respect what Wikipedia strives for. I hope someone with love for Wikipedia and the understanding of how important recording objective truth is receives this. For posterity.
Sincerely, Matthew Fennell
PS: I hit submit and the page froze, so this may be a duplicate. Perhaps third times the charm without vpn. StableColonel (talk) 13:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Not an edit request. Even if it were, the right place for it would be Talk:Florida Parental Rights in Education Act, which is not protected. Favonian (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I am the representative of the public organization "TETChange". Please kindly remove the company TETChanee from the information about money laundering. that is 100% false. The company is legal. It works as a public organization. The Editor gave false information about U.S. sanctions, since the company TetChange has never been under any sanctions. This type of disinformation can mislead and put us in the black PR list, which is something the editor should be responsible for. We ensure that our clients are always safe and can rely on us fully. Please do not dodge our name. Thank you in advance. Spacenan8 (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done The string "Tet", let alone "Tetchange", does not exist in the article as it is presently written. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- And as for the change to Cryptocurrency that you requested, I decline to do that specifically due to it being in a contentious topic, but I am of the opinion the list that it is in either needs to be sourced or deleted. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
11 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CoconutOctopus talk 13:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Windawindawinda (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. Favonian (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For whatever reason, this page is targeted for vandalism. Apparently it's being retained for WP:HISPAGES, so if it can't be deleted, encase it in carbonite. One cookie (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Done. No need for that page to be open for general edits, really. DS (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism, addition of unsourced content to a WP:BLP. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Mass attack, unsourced changes to a WP:BLP. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. BangJan1999 18:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is the first protection. Johnuniq (talk) 03:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry returned after protection expired. Nobody (talk) 05:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP Vandalism since the last protection expired; Already discussed on the Talk page but, IPs aren't following the consensus. See Revision history, Discussion1 and Discussion2. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 06:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Six months is a bit long but what a timesink. Johnuniq (talk) 03:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Social media "online wars" are bleeding onto this Wikipedia article. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 22:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with this and would like to request indefinite semi-protection if possible, since this is a BLP. Since at least early November, several IPs have been repeatedly changing "co-founded" to "joined", without verification and in contravention of the citations, regarding a philanthropy the subject co-founded. Softlavender (talk) 02:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Grorp and Softlavender: This is the first protection. Please let me know if problems continue. Johnuniq (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP issues coming from different IP users. MaterialsPsych (talk) 01:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Issues resumed after last protection expired. MaterialsPsych (talk) 01:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption from IP-hopper. MrOllie (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent WP:DE / unsourced additions by IP editors. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring over the addition of a popular culture section. This Reddit post seems to have exasperated things. Deauthorized. (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Elevated IP vandalism over the past two weeks. Update: persistent as of the past hour. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Protection type: Full protection from anyone aside from admins Reason: User or user keeps adding information deemed false despite repeated warnings to provide genuine sources to prove they are still ongoing. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_protests_against_the_amnesty_(2023-2024)&diff=prev&oldid=1205845079 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Unidosporasensio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dreimouse_in_an_nutshell https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_protests_against_the_amnesty_(2023-2024)&diff=prev&oldid=1200536779 I believe these users are the same ones, and this dispute has been ongoing for months about whether the protests are ongoing. This user says they are still ongoing, but have never provided any genuine sources to prove it, and t he protests largely faded in mid November. I certainly haven't seen any articles suggesting otherwise. Since this is now a recurring problem, I ask that the page be moved back to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_protests_against_the_amnesty_(2023-2024)&diff=prev&oldid=1200573823 here, and that the user, since I think its a sock account, to be banned for consistently rejecting warnings to give sources, along with the page to be protected for a whiile from editing aside from administrators. Thank you. 2607:FEA8:7221:F600:6D6D:96B4:58C3:9331 (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Note: Fixed link to page in section header. All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 02:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 19:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing by both IP's and users. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 00:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism & disruptive edits over at least the last few years. Requesting semi-protection of a few years as a starting point, given that this page hasn't been protected before (as far as I can see). All the best. —a smart kitten[meow] 01:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – multiple IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez: Is there an obvious reason the categories added by the IPs are not appropriate? If so, please explain on article talk and try to engage the IPs, for example by linking to talk section in an edit summary. Johnuniq (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hard to engage with a dynamic IP - different IP in the /64 range each time. Obvious reason is in my edit summaries which is usually sufficient for most editors. Those are categories for character articles, not articles about a novel. Also one of the categories is covered by an existing one which is appropriate for a novel article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I did add the talk page message. Ignored as expected. Popped up again as a different IP. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hard to engage with a dynamic IP - different IP in the /64 range each time. Obvious reason is in my edit summaries which is usually sufficient for most editors. Those are categories for character articles, not articles about a novel. Also one of the categories is covered by an existing one which is appropriate for a novel article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Very low quality sources are reporting that this man has been arrested for killing his wife. I have been unable to find any reliable sources that are willing to report this at this time, but this story has been added and expanded on throughout the day. LM2000 (talk) 07:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Its hard to justify protection just yet, there is just the single instance of adding the questionable material, and they seem to have done so in good faith. I would agree that the sources are NOT up to par (although it may very well be true). For now, I agree with you reverting it out, and being a BLP, there is a degree of exemption for reverting it back out even after 3RR considering the sources. I would suggest leaving a note on the talk page, and the editors' talk page over it. Until there is decent sourcing, the material should stay out, but until it is more than a single instance, it is hard to protect it. I will leave this here to stew, and see what happens over the next few hours, rather than outright "decline". Dennis Brown 2¢ 08:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined @LM2000: My instinct is to protect but there is nothing on talk discussing the sources and there are sources with the claim although I don't know if they are RS. Try WP:BLP to see their reaction to the news reporting. Given a small hint of agreement at BLP I would semi it for a couple of weeks. Johnuniq (talk) 03:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- It has since gotten better coverage. The previous sources were definitely unreliable, but the situation has passed that point now. Feel free to close this.LM2000 (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 07:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 08:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined @LG-Gunther: It's hard to justify protection when there is no explanation of the problem. It might be obvious to someone familiar with the topic but it is not clear to me. Please create the article talk page with a section that politely explains why the IP edits are unhelpful or not supported by reliable sources. Johnuniq (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of disruptive editing from IP users. Brat Forelli🦊 08:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 03:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirm protection due to persistent sockpuppetry and other long-running policy issues on an article related to a conventionally (rather than community-identified) contentious topic. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Combatuser1 for the most recent persistent sockpuppet to frequently disrupt the article. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Was about to submit a request myself for escalation to Extended-confirmed until RedWarn told me yours existed :). The sock edits are clearly a problem on that article - good call. — That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 22:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of the duration, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed protection requested due to significant disruptive behavior, edit warring and personal attacks[49]. The behavior, from a single editor, has been going on since early 10 February 2024 without a pause. A similar request was made and granted for Demographic history of Kosovo for the exact same behavior.[50] ElderZamzam (talk) 02:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent moving of Moonbin (whom has decreased) from Past members to Active members. In which, a recent (kind of) example that I could think of is Linkin Park which also has similar issues previously where this discussion is of relevant. — 🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔 • 📝) 02:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am also going to log this one at CTOPS under BLP because constantly insisting a dead member of the band (one actually dead, not just spending a year dead for tax purposes) is still a member, their decedence notwithstanding, violates BRDP in my opinion. Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined @The Herald: It's hard to justify protection when there is no explanation of the problem. It might be obvious to someone familiar with the topic but it is not clear to me. Please explain on article talk and try to engage other editors with a link to the talk section. Johnuniq (talk) 03:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continous unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined @Filmssssssssssss: I blocked the IP and don't see any other recent problems. Pending changes is a pain because vandalism still occurs and has to be examined and reverted. Let me know or ask again here if it recurs. Johnuniq (talk) 03:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stop vandalism and page blanking. StewieGriffin&EricCartman (talk) 18:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined IP blocked by another admin. @StewieGriffin&EricCartman: Let me know if it recurs. Johnuniq (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 07:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: editwarring Magherbin (talk) 19:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Johnuniq (talk) 04:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. By HJ Mitchell. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism by the same IP over three times Mario Napoletano (talk) 23:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined. Mario Napoletano, the source (which seems to be someone's blog) says in the title that his ancestors were Moldovan. Why are you reverting the IP? Sdrqaz (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of UAK. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption once in February and once in January. Before that, disruption occurred in August. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 00:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing since 6 February. Disruption before that was three weeks prior to that. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism by 80.136.196.48 who's also making trouble on the Wiki pages of Black's family members:
- Claims subject's daughter Celine is "non-notable" and deletes any mention of her,[51] even though Celine acted alongside her mother on film and has been mentioned in the press countless times.
- Makes similar edits to the Wiki pages of Black's son[52] and sister.[53][54]
- Puts "Conflict of Interest" tag on page for no reason.[55] Claims in edit summary that content is "unreferenced", which is a complete lie and an obvious one at that.
- Deems entire family of Theodore McKeldin as "non-notable" and deletes properly sourced content, including the acknowledgment of a deceased grandson who twice ran for public office.[56]
- Removes licensed photos from article,[57] claiming that "family snaps are non-notable", which is rubbish as Gold Star articles like James Stewart and Katharine Hepburn display such photos. Deep Purple 2013 (talk) 21:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined @Deep Purple 2013: The IP might be correct. Please discuss the issues on article talk. Focus on article content and do not call the IP's edits "disruptive" unless they are obvious vandalism (they're not). I do not see family photos such as at permalink at the articles mentioned above. Please ask questions at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 05:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello - please excuse me if I am not reporting this in the correct format. A recently registered editor, Deep Purple 2013 is making a series of edits to the Karen Black article together with articles related to her: [58], [59], [60] and [61] Such an emphasis on one family to the exclusion of other subjects is sufficient enough, but the added content is of personal nature including family photographs. Advise regarding COI has been posted, but it has been ignored. Could someone investigate?
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – much vandalism... 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 22:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is explanation of a problem on article talk. Johnuniq (talk) 05:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism and poor quality edits, primarily by IP users, over the last several months to years. See page history for evidence. Brusquedandelion (talk) 08:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing Socialwave597 (talk) 05:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most recent disruption seems to have been over a week ago. Daniel Case (talk) 06:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same disruption as last time. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 07:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Seasider53 (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MaterialsPsych (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -Lemonaka 14:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Lemonaka: Are you sure that diff (an addition of a "Controversies" section to a BLP sourced to texasscorecard.com and wordpress.com) is justified? See WP:CRIT. Johnuniq (talk) 03:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq It's not that justified, but that's an obvious case for log-out editing or sockpuppetry which I need to revert. -Lemonaka 09:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- More opinions on this needed, please. Johnuniq (talk) 10:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq It's not that justified, but that's an obvious case for log-out editing or sockpuppetry which I need to revert. -Lemonaka 09:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Two users warned;
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Vandalism. MaterialsPsych (talk) 09:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Clovermoss. Favonian (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A recently blocked editor[62] is hopping IPs and repeating the same shenanigans.[63][64] Not only does Black's page need protection from the blocked editor, so do the pages of her family members. Deep Purple 2013 (talk) 09:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) A similar request was recently declined. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 10:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – the purpose of RFPP is not to win edit-wars, especially when the requesting editor has broken 3RR on multiple articles. Black Kite (talk) 10:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is the second time the COI editor has made a false allegation of vandalism. After the first false accusation an admin. advised them that the edits were not vandalism, and indeed expressed sympathy for the edits. I raised the COI issues on the Admin. Notice Board (incidents) after which an Admin posted a message on the COI editor's talk page. The COI editor ignored the message and continued with COI edits.
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 09:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 17:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism due to recent intimate video leak (see here for coverage). I know it's not too much but as this page has few edits overall, this does mean a big percentage is vandalism. GnocchiFan (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit that was reverted in the past year. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 18:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 19:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. Blue Barette Bam's target again. – 64andtim (talk) 19:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 19:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 19:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 19:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 19:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Northheavensky (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – on 09 feb journalist Wagle's car attacked by Bharatiya Janata Part'ys workers. After that many ip's changed the articles NPOV form. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued reversions by IP user(s). Sciencefish (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I would like to see some talk page consensus about what makes the Qatar visit different from the others. Right now, it looks like a content disagreement. Joyous! Noise! 16:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 20:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: To prevent this newly created page from vandalising. Because i had put many efforts on this page creation. Chparveshtaak (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Change the engine from Unity to NeoX. Aexadev (talk) 17:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Rules of Survival is not protected. Remember to include a reliable source for your claim. Favonian (talk) 17:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
12 February 2024
Reason: Frequent vandalism by IP users. This time it appears to be fans of certain teams artificially inflating wins and statistics (I was able to revert that vandalism manually). Vandalism has been a problem with this page in the past as well. Captain Parmenter (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 23:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: * Sengoku-lord (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) continuous biased, uneducated vandalism and potential sockpuppets by new user removing sourced sections of this article (against policies) past numerous warnings, see Article reversions SMS on the rocks (talk) 17:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined This is a content dispute and we're not going to fully protect some article for it. You can try to address the problem on the talk page. Also, your opponent is not a vandal, though they are editing somewhat disruptively and I warned them for it. Drmies (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- hi, the history shows numerous before that suspected sockpuppet in light of recent wars and since Trump presidency. isn't there a protection level in between?
- also the recent suspected sockpuppet or new user also has already been warned by at least 2 others before you per his talk page, thx SMS on the rocks (talk) 17:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- SMS on the rocks, you just reverted the above admins edits to the article. I suggest you go to the article talk page and explain why you think the content is good to include. Yaris678 (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Edit-warring and IP editing in WP:ECR topic (Israel & Palestine). 33ABGirl (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by DanCherek. Favonian (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. Same LTA doing it all over again. – 64andtim (talk) 23:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Joyous! Noise! 00:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 00:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 00:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism on the page since the last month, especially by new user accounts. ManaliJain (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Steven Walling • talk 23:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of the unsourced changes, disruptive edits, and edit warring from various single-use IPs, in which numerous of them seem to be proxies according to the IP Quality Score website. ImaSandwich860 (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1 day semi, lots of unconstructive at best IP edits. DarmaniLink (talk) 00:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP users going back years. Nanni is a living person, so the edits are potentially libellous. Examples: [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75] Brian Halvorsen (talk) 21:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Putting the article on your watchlist is more in line with protection policy. Joyous! Noise! 23:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Please protect this article for around 6 months or a year with semi-protection to prevent defamatory and false information from being added and seen by public as a trusted info. Natsuikomin (talk) 00:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I also suggest pending changes protection. Thanks Natsuikomin (talk) 00:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – mass edit war going on for days. Moxy- 04:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Pretty much a constant stream of edit-warring vandalism that has led to a couple of blocks already, may well be shitting IP or shocking. Slatersteven (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- "Shitting IP"? What do you have to eat to make that happen? Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. PCP no longer seems to be working to deter vandalistic edits. Logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I'm requesting extended confirmation protection for the page, as it's related to the Israel-Hamas War, and describes a proposed military operation that could occur soon. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 19:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBCOM CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ingenuity. Indef ECP and logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bagumba. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 02:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Abu Simbel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Darius III (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Scorpio (astrology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Armenian language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption by WP:LTA/ARARAT again. Blocking is generally futile as they can straight jump to another IP/range with no problem. HistoryofIran (talk) 02:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All articles. Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently pending-changes protected (as a result of a previous request), but is receiving persistent vandalism - as far as I can see, all of the non-autoconfirmed edits since pending-changes was put in place on the 29th Jan have been reverted (22 edits, if I can count correctly). I'm therefore requesting an upgrade to semiprotection, due to the high rate of vandalism by IP editors, which seems like it may have increased since the 29th. Pinging Robertsky as the protecting admin. All the best. —a smart kitten[meow] 02:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Robertsky. One month. Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by multinationals, possibly for political and nationalist reasons. Very frequently visited article and is a very popular topic. The page seems to be used as a source by many outside websites. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 00:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Indeed, the page should be semi-protected. GoodDay (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Yourlocallordandsavior and GoodDay: I looked at a couple of recent IP edits and they don't seem to be obvious vandalism. If there is a problem with frequent changes with poor or missing reliable sources, please put a few examples on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 05:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined There have been very few edits and there is nothing new on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits by IP again and again. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 12:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am not disrupting the table in bigg boss 13 has issues. This person does have a problem and won’t tell me. 2A02:6B68:10:4E00:1049:1DE2:FEBD:274D (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- in housemates status the Quit template is not used properly and also there are some wrong info regarding secret room 2A02:6B68:10:4E00:1049:1DE2:FEBD:274D (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not clearly seeing disruption. If this is a content dispute, it needs to be taken to Talk:Bigg Boss (Hindi season 13) and sorted out there. —C.Fred (talk) 13:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi fred it’s been sorted as misunderstanding we both speak on talk page. 2A02:6B68:10:4E00:1049:1DE2:FEBD:274D (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi fred it’s been sorted as misunderstanding we both speak on talk page. 2A02:6B68:10:4E00:1049:1DE2:FEBD:274D (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not clearly seeing disruption. If this is a content dispute, it needs to be taken to Talk:Bigg Boss (Hindi season 13) and sorted out there. —C.Fred (talk) 13:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- in housemates status the Quit template is not used properly and also there are some wrong info regarding secret room 2A02:6B68:10:4E00:1049:1DE2:FEBD:274D (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Copyright violations. BangJan1999 16:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Stub article currently at AfD. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 20:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LouisOrr27 (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. (I've already done this for these edits). Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page edited previously banned user via block evasion (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Chicago_(band)&oldid=984954333). Same party has returned with different IPs and resumed making same edit. 1) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Chicago_(band)&oldid=1205522030 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Chicago_(band)&oldid=1204967634 3) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Chicago_(band)&oldid=1204220297 AbleGus (talk) 03:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2603:8000:9603:B4CD:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For one year this time. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Full semi protection, vandalism. Ccole2006 (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I meant infinite semi protection, my bad. Ccole2006 (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Two attempts recently to change a program named in the article from The Edge
to The Edging
([76], [77]; I'm assuming as a reference to Edging (sexual practice)). The sentence in question is unsourced, but I found this & this that refer to the program as the former, while I couldn't find any sources that refer to it as the latter.
I found the first diff through Huggle, while the last diff went a few days before I noticed it by chance. Looking through the history, it appears that The edging
was also inserted here in 2021 & wasn't removed until 2023. I therefore think that this page would benefit from pending-changes protection. Best,. —a smart kitten[meow] 00:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @A smart kitten: What about removing the short and not particularly encyclopedic paragraph? It seems to have had a "citation needed" tag for a long time. Johnuniq (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq: I could do that - it’s just that the topic area isn’t one that I’m overly familiar with (as well as it being more of a content decision than a counter-vandalism one - the latter being what I’m currently more familiar with). Having said that, though, I am now tempted to blow up the unsourced paragraphs.Even if the sentence is removed, though, I still think the page would benefit from pending-changes - for example, edits in 2021 (the one linked above & this) also introduced other pieces of vandalism that weren’t caught for a fair while. I’m worried that even if the sentence is removed, the article would still be a probable target for other instances of (potentially long-lasting) vandalism, due to being an article about a school. All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 14:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption is really not even heavy enough to warrant pending-changes protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 08:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism. Eg224 (talk) 07:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Note: fixed pagelinks template so the bot doesn't get confused. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
Should also likely apply to Death of Diana, Princess of Wales and Candle in the Wind 1997 based on vandalism patterns. Greatpopcorn (talk) 09:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/122.54.92.233
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/49.151.104.49
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/32.140.234.250
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/122.52.215.79
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/124.105.21.141
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing, persistent removal of content by IPs similar to that of a blocked user. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 14:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. @Ser!: Not only does it appear there's action by IPs that are socks of a blocked user, but there are also BLP concerns when the material the IP removed is readded. The page may need protected, but it might not be the version you expect that gets protected because of the BLP issues. —C.Fred (talk) 15:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection, persistent disruption. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 06:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- User blocked - request probably moot. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 06:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Moot at least for now. Lectonar (talk) 12:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the page protection expired, vandal IPs and other users have struck again to vandalize the page. I think this should be protected indefinitely to conform to BLP standards. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. protection duration is usually slowly extended; it's quite rare that pages get indefinitely protected from the start. Lectonar (talk) 13:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, so I added the BLP tag. Hopefully it stays protected for a while. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that BLP applies here, as this is a fictional character, not an actual living person. Joyous! Noise! 14:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Is it? Oh, I didn't notice. Do you want me to put the vandalism tag instead? NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I was mulling this BLP connection for a bit, but the character seems to be so ingrained in Filipino culture that it might as well apply. Lectonar (talk) 14:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Eh, I'm not sure. You guys can figure it out since I got a little dumbfounded. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I was mulling this BLP connection for a bit, but the character seems to be so ingrained in Filipino culture that it might as well apply. Lectonar (talk) 14:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Is it? Oh, I didn't notice. Do you want me to put the vandalism tag instead? NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that BLP applies here, as this is a fictional character, not an actual living person. Joyous! Noise! 14:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, so I added the BLP tag. Hopefully it stays protected for a while. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High evel of vandalism from the same non registered(IP) account for days. Mariusx12 (talk) 11:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Note: This looks like an edit war. I can see that the IP is trying to impose a new version, but I don't think either version reflects the source. I have updated the article to reflect the source. Hopefully that will encourage all editors to leave of the edit warring. Yaris678 (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. You see, that's the reason why the autotaxobox system is fundamentally broken. Big clades having their phylogeny in flux, meaning that we end up with obscure clades like this one for recent phylogenetic proposals, that end up transcluded on 150 thousand pages. And then, someone forgets to template protect it, and, well, you have a template transcluded on more than half of the insect pages that's a complete vulnerability. It could be solved by making skip-templates for all the insect orders directly calling Insecta as parent, so that this one is only transcluded in the handful of insect order pages. Probably a better solution than having to protect every single clade and likely missing some, although that might take a while (and a lot of template-protected edit requests) to implement. Really, we need skip-templates, putting template protection on this thing is more of a band-aid but the mere fact of this being a vulnerability already bugs me. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Template protected indefinitely. – robertsky (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Isi96_reported_by_User:Skarz_(Result:_). skarz (talk) 14:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a content dispute in which both editors are editwarring over whether this is a documentary (which the OP added to it again after going to AN#) and whether the Nazis were the main victimes of WW3. I'm involved and don't think protection will be neutral. Page bans to let them duke it out on the talk page? Doug Weller talk 14:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And...
Wikipedia's protection policy does not allow the administrator who instates a page protection because of an ongoing edit dispute to pick a particular version to protect. They have to protect the most recent version; at most they may revert blatant vandalism. In a content dispute it is impossible to make everyone happy; this is not the administrator's fault, it is simply a consequence of the underlying dispute. See The Wrong Version for an essay about this exact type of situation. There is no point in lobbying administrators to edit or revert a protected page, since they are generally not allowed to do that. If you're unhappy about the protected version, the fastest and best way to do something about it is to resolve the content dispute on the talk page and ask for the page to be unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Editormallu (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 16:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP violation Turtle Historian (talk) 08:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs edit-warring since mid-January over unconstructive edits and ignoring pleas for a discussion on the talk page. — Archer1234 (t·c) 09:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism from multiple accounts. HeinzMaster (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @HeinzMaster This page is already semi-protected. FP is way overkill here, and the problem seems to have stopped with semi-protection. jayhawker6 (talk) 16:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator JBW. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dfertileplain (talk) 10:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit warring which has not abated since the last semi-protected period expired. HeptatonicScale (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 17:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Please undo all the edits done on 12th February and restore the page to as it is before 12th February. There is a high vandalism going on regarding the date of creation of the news paper with edits and counter edits. Abhirampraj (talk) 09:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Robertsky. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term disruption also part of Kurds and Kurdistan. Shadow4dark (talk) 09:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. daSupremo 12:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page since this is implicating conflicting nationality claims. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent disruption. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Review of last year of PCP reveals absolutely no positive contributions from Wikipedia's Great Unwashed, so just taking it to the next level. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various different IP addresses over the past week. Panian513 15:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Full protection: Persistent disruptive editing - This Unser who keeps vandalizing the Canadian National 7312 article, is doing the same thing on the Strasburg Rail Road article. This IP user keeps constantly deleting CN 7312 from the equipment section and refuses to take the issue to the talk page, this article needs to be protected indefinitely because the IP refuses to stop. 2601:188:CC81:C420:3167:82FD:8FC6:237E (talk) 15:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Liu1126 (talk) 18:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:DE on the release date, cast etc., WP:OR contributions by IP editors. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced change to census figures by IP range [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83]. They used to do this before as can be seen in the article history. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 103.181.16.56/29 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article (the only one edited from that range) for a year. Yes, last year I semi'ed the article for six months. But looking at the edits since that protection expired, it seems like this might more directly address the issue. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Addendum: Added CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Right after the first user got blocked, another user jumped in to keep making the same changes. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 12:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: TheyThemcausingMayhem (talk · contribs) blocked by C.Fred. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Serious IP and proxy vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 13:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1000:B12B:8FBD:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Malcolmxl5. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Vandalism is still happening, so this might be worth looking at again. Giraffer (talk) 22:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of consistent IP (and new user) vandalism. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 13:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. They stopped about six hours ago. I have also given them another warning. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined for now, since while the edit warring has been fierce, we haven't seen the two participants have been given enough time since being warned to take the hint and work it out on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit war from a single IP address Schopy1988 (talk) 17:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined. It's been, what, maybe two hours since you suggested they get involved on the talk page? Let's give them a little more time to give that a try. Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason:Edit War, People changing the date that the State was created, it was created in 1918 per article but users without account keep changing it to 1917, and users keep puting the fake map on the infobox again,and i talked about the map in discussion to remove it. Jaztie não é árabe (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:F690:FC0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week, as they've been engaging in this edit warring without really communicating on a number of Caucasus-related articles. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Per article history for 12 February 2024, there has been lots of disruptive editing going on over 8 hours. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 22:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, mostly from a variety of IP addresses. The list article's entries on Malaysia and Israel have been subject to the majority of the disruption. Declangi (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 22:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This non-notable topic has been the focus of more than one Nigerian editor. Because socking has been used for this topic, I suspect more socks will re-create the article as has already happened once. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
13 February 2024
Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition from IPv4 and IPv6 of content to the infobox without any source and which is not mentioned in the body of the article. Their response to an edit summary focused on sourcing and WP:OR is "Any lack of critical thinking and basic comparison skills from a random user are also unsubstantiated as well. Study Irish mythology and look at Cethlenn’s role in the mythology. Short sightedness is acceptable but closed off stupidity isn’t." So, no prospect of a reliable source. NebY (talk) 20:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined, the IP has only made two edits, although I can see where this is disruptive. Still, a little premature to protect if the only problem is one IP editor that hasn't crossed the line to be blocked yet. Dennis Brown 2¢ 22:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Per WP:BLP, WP:BDP, and MOS:GENDERID. There's a lot of misinformation online about the suspect shooter's gender identity, and some of it has been making its way into the article from IP and non-autoconfirmed editors. Sideswipe9th (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP refusing to discuss on talk page or heed past discussions and accept consensus. Srnec (talk) 01:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. 2 days. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Add to and/or edit information about water absorption. Ahoover2 (talk) 22:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done because vague requests are not actionable. Furthermore, @Ahoover2: You didn't read the directions above. You must make edit requests on the article's talk page. Furthermore, your request must be specific, like "change X to Y" citing reliable sources as appropriate.
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page was previously protected (diffs in link) for ten days. Hours after expiration, disruptive edits resumed by same IP 2601:205:4300:54F0. I have reverted dozens of unsourced, disruptive, and non-WP:RS edits by this user on this page alone since October 2023. This behavior extends to many other pages as well (Matt Ross, for one) and none of my requests in edit summaries or his talk pages have been acknowledged or heeded. Can this page please be protected and something please be done about this editor? Rift (talk) 23:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Request permanent semi-protection. I have no idea why this article gets targeted, but it does. As soon as the protection comes off, the vandalism starts again. It's happened at least 3 times now. Just permanently semi-protect it already so we can all stop wasting our time. IP's or new accounts wishing to make good faith edits can always request them on the talk page. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 03:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection as Niji just made the worst PR move they possibly could and we're likely to see a new wave of people coming in. Rockman1159 (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined, as the article has been semi-protected since 8 February. The edit warring by auto-confirmed users needs to stop, or blocks or full protection are likely. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP user. It appears to be the same IP user making edits on Caribbean Series, which has now been temporarily semi-protected for the same reasons. Captain Parmenter (talk) 03:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 69.124.233.9 (talk · contribs) blocked by caknuck. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 05:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting long-term semi-protection - Persistent disruptive edit summaries and vandalism by non-autoconfirmed users. SG5536B (my talk page | my contribs) 05:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Moderate level of IP and new user vandalism: Page history shows about ten instances of vandalism since September 2023. Requesting autoprotection or higher either permanently or for a certain period of time. 2003 LN6 05:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – It appears that the blocked Commons user Commonists is using multiple IP addresses to constantly restore an image they uploaded. This disruption last happened in May 2023 and the page was actually previously protected for a month back then for that reason. — AP 499D25 (talk) 08:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 116.206.33.32 (talk) 06:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Too many unnecessary edits from un confirm users not using sources and random vandalism. Barry564666tgr4gf (talk) 08:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Barry564666tgr4gf: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. You need to request protection on Simple English Wikipedia, we can only protect articles on English Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org). I believe you can make your request at simple:WP:AN. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring - sockpuppetry. The IPs (51.149.8.107 and 51.149.8.67) are blocked user PlainAndSimpleTailor, (previous socks) whose particular page interests are this page and United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020, (where IP has also edited). They have a history of IP hopping so temporary semi-protection will be more effective than blocking a particular IP. Cambial — foliar❧ 11:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Also p-blocked the range from those articles for 6 months. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing resumed as soon as previous protection expired. Tammbecktalk 11:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. A section listing the names of their editing staff, with mini resumes of each has been repeatedly added in December, January and February. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page previously semiprotected for 1 year (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chicago_(band)&oldid=1102309679). Persistent disruptive editing by sockpuppets of banned user Jarcilla on various IP ranges continues. Request page protection be restored. AbleGus (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Request Semi-protection for persistent disruptive editing by IP addresses of various ranges tied to block evasion by banned user Jarcilla. AbleGus (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. matching with main article. – robertsky (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Block evading disruptive editor has returned many times since the last protection expired, both with new accounts and IPs. Requesting something longer than 3 months this time. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 13:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Idiosincrático (talk) 11:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 11:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent block evasion by a cross-wiki LTA abuser via several IPs. See also similar protection applied for Bacchus (Caravaggio), another article affected by this LTA's socks and IPs. Replying to @AP 499D25 and Favonian: from the other article's protection and reverting this LTA's editions. 83.61.247.43 (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Can we changed the Protection level from Semi-protection to Pending changes? Because the editing has been reduced JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 09:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Looks like the talk page edit requests are handled in a timely fashion, most of them being rejected. That the "editing has been reduced" is an expected byproduct of article protection. Favonian (talk) 11:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Never ending disruptive edits by IPs and new accounts to WP:ARBIPA article. FDW777 (talk) 08:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- List of kings of Commagene (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Osorkon II (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by WP:LTA/ARARAT. Blocking is generally futile, as they easily jump from one IP/range to another. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Some IPs keep adding AI generated unsourced content about this individual. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 16:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continuous high level of IP vandalism. Sutyarashi (talk) 13:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always the same IP. Lectonar (talk) 15:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: important party better to protect. PhonecianSoldier (talk) 15:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit more than 6 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 15:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing by IP user 118.140.29.162 who appears to be acting on behalf of the company. Editor has rewritten article to remove all criticism, citing no sources other than BNN Breaking itself. Also reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia. The article for the company's founder Gurbaksh Chahal has already been protected due to conflicts of interest and disruptive editing. DanielMichaelPerry (talk) 16:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Long-term semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Very persistent London-based IP additions of a hoax that Peter Sallis was involved as an "uncredited" voice actor. Ongoing for at least four months. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks: [84] [85][86] Sock farm[87]. O3000, Ret. (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please note that talk pages are very rarely ECP'ed Daniel Case (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Except for CTOPs lately, which this wasn't. The user apparently does not have a static IP. Thanks. O3000, Ret. (talk) 20:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Seasonal spate of disruptive jingoistic edits 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Instead of issuing a block to just one editor...let's see if we can get them all talking on the proper talk page. Moxy- 20:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have set a watchlist ping to remind me to restore ECP after this protection expires. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
14 February 2024
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Riktetta (talk) 13:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High likelyhood of false information being entered 2A0A:EF40:C23:6501:DA23:A45F:5A6D:55ED (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. – robertsky (talk) 16:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not going to mount a campaign against that policy in general, but I do think, in this case, that it is the wrong policy for all pages covering candidates in the most important election in history. Even false information that is live for 2 minutes can sway voters. Elmeter (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. WiinterU (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite Semi-protection: High amount of tampering of main cast by IPs according to their pov. Imsaneikigai (talk) 13:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: This might not be needed now that I have started an RfC, but there have been continued edit wars over the infobox. I'm not suggesting full protection though, since it's only a small part of the article that is getting edit warred. As far I know, this has been happening on-and-off for many years now, where a new or inexperienced editor will make a change, it gets reverted (usually with a string of further edit warring by other editors), and then when it comes time to discuss they are nowhere to be found. And it still seems to happen despite a note on the article saying not to change without consensus, which has been there since at least 2021 I believe. Sagflaps (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- It is odd "someone" keeps changing it dispite the note and being reverted by multuple editors [88], [89], [90], [91], [92] Moxy-
16:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined No, protection is indeed not necessary now that you started an RFC. Sagflaps, you are lucky that most of Moxy's linked diffs are a month old because that kind of blithe defiance of existing consensus as indicated by not just an inline hidden comment next to the text you repeatedly changed but an edit notice would have moved me to block you from the page had it been brought to administrative attention in a timely fashion. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Rapid editing by many IP users, it is triggering AntiVandal like crazy. Shadow311 (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- The edits are also going so fast its hard to revert vandalism edits to the page. Shadow311 (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- People are also making good faith edits without consulting proper sources about the date, Confusing the date of publishing(Today the 13th) as the date of death(Actual Date of Death was yesterday, the 12th) Ioangogo (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see much actual vandalism caused by the IPs. There is quite a lot of good anon editing, other than the confusion over the death date (which I believe is good faith, if mistaken). Joyous! Noise! 18:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well I mostly requested the protection so that the people who were going back and forth would actually discuss it on the talk page instead of the group constantly reverting each other. Shadow311 (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sometimes it actually works just to suggest that option to them first ... Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well I mostly requested the protection so that the people who were going back and forth would actually discuss it on the talk page instead of the group constantly reverting each other. Shadow311 (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of poorly sourced/unsourced content. HorrorLover555 (talk) 20:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
In written by, please add the names Abner Tulagan and Louize Al-Sheri ATulagan (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – The article isn't protected, and you already tried twice to make the change, both times rejected for lack of reliable sources. If you can't provide those, the change won't happen. Favonian (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 21:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: As with Junglies, this article is being utterly hammered with hoax content and unreliable sources by the same London-based IPs. Ongoing since at least September 2023. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If they are repeatedly trying to add hoaxes, I would recommend compiling more information and making a report to WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MrOllie (talk) 23:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 01:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:GS/KURDS applies here. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 03:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism ~ JASWE (talk) 02:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And layered with
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 02:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MakaveliReed. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Previous protection expired on 28 January, almost every edit since then from non-extended confirmed users has been vandalism or disruptive in some way. Requesting indefinite ECP per WP:GENSEX. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can somebody get this guy's TPA revoked?. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 03:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 03:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 03:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism [93] [94]. Greatpopcorn (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Favonian (talk) 06:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism picked right back up after protection lapse. Nswix (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 09:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism ~ JASWE (talk) 03:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 09:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism ~ JASWE (talk) 03:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 09:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism ~ JASWE (talk) 03:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown 2¢ 09:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Kinu. Favonian (talk) 09:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Multiple users changing the infobox picture even though the current one (as of 14 February 2024 9:02 AM CET) was decided upon by consensus. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 08:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 11:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Speculation being added to the article by IP editors due to recent media coverage of the subject. Approx. 2-day semi protection should be sufficient to prevent damage. — kashmīrī TALK 10:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 18 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Maybe a bit longer this time? I am edit warring with IPs. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 11:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 11:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism from unconfirmed signing. The Kip 05:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 14:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: One week of edit war waged by IP 82.0.40.72 Schopy1988 (talk) 08:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, the IP is correct that Newsweek is not considered "Generally reliable" past 2013, per this RFC, so them removing your one addition using that source might be considered reasonable. Dennis Brown 2¢ 09:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- The source is not "Newsweek" directly but a quote from an expert, Nicholas Drummond, who has confirmed the estimate as you can see in the talk page. Furthermore, I do not see it as behavior marked by good faith to cite a source for 2 years with a clear typographical error within it, then when the error is discovered, first the error and the original source are defended and then the source it's completely deleted.Schopy1988 (talk) 10:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This can't be solved via protection. Try Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Lectonar (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- The source is not "Newsweek" directly but a quote from an expert, Nicholas Drummond, who has confirmed the estimate as you can see in the talk page. Furthermore, I do not see it as behavior marked by good faith to cite a source for 2 years with a clear typographical error within it, then when the error is discovered, first the error and the original source are defended and then the source it's completely deleted.Schopy1988 (talk) 10:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Some newly registered users making unnecessary edits like removing parenthesis and redirecting, without discussing on talk page. RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 11:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 11:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khalafvand. Wikishovel (talk) 12:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Resumption of edit-warring after the expiration of previous page protection. Khirurg (talk) 00:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Question: Has the dispute been settled or is protection to stop edit warring still needed? Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Isabelle Belato: The dispute is still very much ongoing, as you can see from the talkpage history [95]. Khirurg (talk) 03:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of another week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If talk page discussion isn#t enough to solve the problems, the next steps from Wikipedia:Dispute resolution should be tried; a third opinion is often helpful. Lectonar (talk) 15:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Isabelle Belato: The dispute is still very much ongoing, as you can see from the talkpage history [95]. Khirurg (talk) 03:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every edit since October 2023 has been either vandalism or editors reverting said vandalism, with vandalism occurring multiple times every month since October 2023. Panian513 15:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Change link on Micronesia from the region to the country of Federated States of Micronesia. 51.148.70.131 (talk) 16:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Done, thanks!
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There was a recent incidence of vandalism just a few days after I published this article. It's similar to Incel and I'm expecting a lot of vandalism/disruptive editing to come up here – I think pending changes protection or semi-protection would be helpful. TLA (talk) 00:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Feel free to bring this back to RFPP if vandalism levels pick up, though. Joyous! Noise! 14:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Disruption by same IP. Lectonar (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 15:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – IPC. Will120 (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing continues after protections expired yesterday. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Disruptive IPs edit war over Israel-related content. Skitash (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – RUW. Will120 (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/RUSUKR Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Newly elected President of Indonesia. Lots of vandalism. Stanley Gordon (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Can someone please attend to this ASAP? There's been around 5 new vandal edits and there is currently loads of traffic to the article. Thx, Stanley Gordon (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We don't not preemptively protected pages, especially at the levels you are asking for. However, I recognise that there have been some recent disruptive edits which warrant at least a semi protection. – robertsky (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- As a bit of a preemptive measure, can we also protect Gibran Rakabuming Raka? Running mate of the above. Juxlos (talk) 16:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I've been trying to remove unsourced or badly sourced material from this article and have been reverted by IPs from the University of Milwaulkee. Their last edit summary reads "undid revision 1207328510 by Doug Weller (talk (A/CU/OS)) Conventional chronologists like you should leave Rohl's work alone. This is New Chronology, not Conventional chronology". They've been adding unsourced since Feb. 6th. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 15:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have also decided to log this one at CTOPS under CF Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Will120 (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Several IP users constantly vandals the page with unreliable sources –A6397 T A L K! 19:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Several IP users constantly vandals the page with unreliable sources –A6397 T A L K! 19:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
15 February 2024
Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent Vandalism — This IP address 141.151.86.114 continued to disrupting edit to add this number unsources without explaining edit summary. 24.46.162.7 (talk) 21:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Or you could block this IP address 141.151.86.114 feel free to do that. 24.46.162.203 (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked 141.151.86.114 by HJ Mitchell for one week so never mind. 24.46.161.84 (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – RUW. Will120 (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/RUSUKR. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. Panian513 23:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 23:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much disruption since the start of February. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 00:51, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Change "by the end of the 4th century BC" to "by the end of the 5th century BC (403/402 BC)" Ioanab (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Assuming we're talking about the last paragraph of Greek alphabet#Archaic variants, it begins with
By the late fifth century BC, it was commonly used by many Athenians. In c. 403 BC, ...
Then, at the end of the paragraph, it saysBy the end of the fourth century BC, ...
In other words, it outlines a development in the course of nearly a century, so all is as it should be. Favonian (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Will120 (talk) 22:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – infrequently edit but almost all vandalism & reverts. Will120 (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner talk 22:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- By now edit warring, vandalism and block evasion by an IP. The Banner talk 23:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked by Izno. Please submit a new request if they resume and we can protect it. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Will120 (talk) 22:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor(s) persistently adding unsourced genres. Edits have been undone three times now with explicit direction in edit summaries. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 19:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring. I made a change to an infobox to remove excess capitalization. Since then, the changes made been undone three times by anonymous IPs, with no reason given. Both of the IPs used have only been used for undoing the changes and haven't performed any other edits. LicenceToCrenellate (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. It looks like it's one editor on an IPv6 address. Regardless, let's try communicating with them by using more meaningful edit summaries and by using their talk page (see WP:BITE). I left them a talk page notice just now, but please warn them if they keep it up. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: With his recent passing, there will be lots of people coming to this new article. There has been a little vandalism, though nothing too crazy. I've also noticed a lot of new accounts and IPs are editing this article, some of which aren't the best at keeping things at a neutral point and agreeing on where information should go. The article is also being edited frequently, which results in lots of edit conflicts before you can publish changes. For this, I'm requesting semi-protection. Autograph84 (talk) 04:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High amounts of IP Vandalism Bigfatman8766 (talk) 06:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I semied it because it did not appear to be protected but then noticed some strange stuff which made me look again and it appears that I downgraded it from ECP to semi so I reinstated the ECP. Johnuniq (talk) 06:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CTOPS in post-1992 U.S. politics. I'm surprised this page has not needed to be protected before. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit warring. The most recent winner was cited under his real name, but was listed under a stage name for his previous nomination. One editor keeps changing the recent nomination to the stage name over the objections of others listing it under his real name. CRBoyer 05:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Recent Vandalism by ip accounts Can you please semi-protect the article? Thanks Avelina925 (talk) 05:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism surge related to "unexpected sex symbol". 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – IPC. Will120 (talk) 19:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 06:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits since February 10 (removal of "Persian" or other non-Arab ethnicities), probably by a WP:BLOCKEVADE user hopping IPs (see previous ANI report here and new SPI report here). R Prazeres (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Article related to Joe Biden creates BLP issues, up for AfD. Already attracting unsourced editing. Suggest Extended Protection to match mother article. Rambling Rambler (talk) 20:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ARBAP2 requested if possible. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 06:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 06:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:51, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: To match Draft:Ramgarh Hill which was creation-protected last year. Repeated target of sockpuppetry by Iptesh Kumar Meher (talk · contribs). Belbury (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Note: While this draft was created by said now blocked user, it was created before the block, so it isn't a G5 deletion (which would have been my way of dealing with it, and fully protect after the deletion); but we shouldn't be fully protecting a draft which has just been declined, but not rejected outright. Lectonar (talk) 15:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- All edits to the draft over the past year look like Meher socks and IPs, seems safe to say it would have been G13'd by now without the block evasion. Belbury (talk) 08:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – RUW. Will120 (talk) 02:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see no disruptive edits at all in the last six months. BusterD (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – RUW. Will120 (talk) 02:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logging appropriately. BusterD (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – RUW. Will120 (talk) 02:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looking through page history, I see no disruptive edits in the last several months. BusterD (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Medium Level of vandalism Avelina925 (talk) 05:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Avelina925: I don't see it. Please explain further or on article talk next time. Johnuniq (talk) 06:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Immediate resume of disruptive editing following previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Lengthy protection history. BusterD (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. per Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues after long protection was removed. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – SPA vandal IP accounts repeatedly changing this Archive. Please protect it permanently for only confirmed named accounts usage. Shearonink (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
In the "Sexual and gender-based violence' subsection under Allegations of War Crimes, the first paragraph ends with the sentence The New York Times reported that "videos of naked and bloodied women filmed by Hamas on the day of the attack, and photographs of bodies taken at the sites afterwards, suggest that women were sexually targeted by their attackers."
(Reference #615 and 616)
Two paragraphs down, the second sentence is The BBC reported that "Videos of naked and bloodied women filmed by Hamas on the day of the attack, and photographs of bodies taken at the sites afterwards, suggest that women were sexually targeted by their attackers."
(Reference 621)
Please add reference 621 to the first paragraph, and add 'and the BBC' following The New York Times, and remove the whole sentence in the third paragraph.
Awshort (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Done Yaris678 (talk) 14:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent activity by sockpuppets trying to sneak in deleted article. See Draft:Ran Neuner (investor) for history. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I see no disruption at this page since the AfD last April. I can't see any basis even for a short term semi-protection at this time. I do appreciate the effort made at the draftspace. Nobody's banging on this door so I may not bolt it, per protection policy. BusterD (talk) 14:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent activity by sockpuppets trying to sneak in deleted article. See Draft:Ran Neuner (investor) for history. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I see no disruption at this redirect since October of 2021. I can't see any basis even for a short term semi-protection at this time. I do appreciate the effort made at the draftspace. BusterD (talk) 14:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent sock trolling. Wikishovel (talk) 17:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unreferenced edits (possibly vandal edits) from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 14:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Ten-month extended confirm following long-lasting disruption, dispute, and vandalism to this article from IPs, registered users, and socks. Subject also falls under CTOPS for IPA, so I would encourage logging it as an enforcement action. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, scratch that, lets go with an indefinite of some sort–this article has been protected four times in the last five years with little effect following the expiration of the protections. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruption does not seem to me consistent enough yet to justify an indef. But I will log it at CTOPS and update the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism/ BLP violations. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP block evasion by globally banned user. Mtattrain (talk) 16:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and addition of unsourced information by numerous IPS to BLP following press speculation on possible sacking. Egghead06 (talk) 17:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started immediately after protection lapse. Event is this weekend, so a few days ought to cover it. Nswix (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Will120 (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own user space. I am requesting indefinite semi-protection in advance because there is an active LTA somewhere that can potentially post very sensitive information here. Thank you for your consideration in protecting. – 64andtim (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined - Nobody is ever going to see or edit that page. On another note, it probably shouldn't exist per WP:DENY. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Sock puppetry Magherbin (talk) 18:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Will also log this at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism mostly based on changing the name of the company without providing reliable sources, as far as I'm aware (from checking news and company website), the name hasn't changed at all. Encoded Talk to me! 15:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: High level of disruptive removal of sourced contents and potential vandalism. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 16:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. There's only one potentially-disruptive user. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Reaper Eternal
- The user has continued with his sourced content removal and insertion of POV original research edits from primary sources. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Then take it to WP:ANI for discussion. I'm not locking down the page because one user can't edit collaboratively. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:47, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bracketing for inevitable IP block evasion by globally banned user. Mtattrain (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
16 February 2024
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long long history of socking on this article across an entire decade - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Amalloyz. That includes attempts to remove facts about the company's lawsuits from the article which I have no doubt will be repeated in future. I've added this one to my watchlist, but I think an indef semi would help reduce the impact of UPE here. BrigadierG (talk) 17:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's not pre-emptive. This article has been intermittently promotionally edited by 10+ SPA socks over the last 9 years. A user connected to the sock farm recently introduced themselves as "we" on a deletion discussion. This article is pretty clearly of interest to a paid reputation management firm which has been diligently disruptively editing for nearly a decade. Another Admin already indef semi'd the other affected article. Not trying to forum shop here, I just think this should be a pretty clear case of LTA requiring a semi. BrigadierG (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The spam resumed immediately after protection expired. Sockpuppetry may also be involved as the same group of IPs and accounts are also targeting Tie Rack and Spudulike. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BBB. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by various IPs over the past month. Beccaynr (talk) 02:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit-warrior refuses to wait for a consensus to emerge from discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Articles_about_Julian_Jaynes. Skyerise (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Edit-warrior refuses to wait for a consensus to emerge from discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Articles_about_Julian_Jaynes. Skyerise (talk) 19:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing by IPs and new accounts. Bbb23 (talk) 02:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 02:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It doesn't look like the page has been protected previously, so I wanted to try a period of semi protection first. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of IP vandalism. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We don't jump straight to indefinite after the page has been unprotected for a long time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Image vandalism. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 02:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent Sockpuppetry 12.41.123.169 (talk) 07:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. 12.41.123.169 (talk) 07:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... 12.41.123.169 (talk) 07:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I wish to publish Draft:Yungeen Ace as it now passes WP:NMUSIC with charting releases which wasn't the case when it was deleted at AfD in May 2021. It was protected by admin Yamaguchi先生 who hasn't edited since last July. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Unprotected, Atlantic306. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Xexerss (talk) 20:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Will120 (talk) 00:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-Protection: Medium-High Level of continuous vandalism by IP user 180.28.59.165 even after warnings to stop being fradulent. I request this page to be Semi-Protected indefinitely. Avelina925 (talk) 03:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Nationality warring, after reaching a concensus in talk. Nswix (talk) 00:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 09:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: Sorry, I fully protected this a moment after you declined it (before seeing your response). It looks like the dispute has been going on for a long time. I think this might be one of those cases where full protection might increase the odds of a real discussion from everyone, are you okay with leaving protection in place? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am unable to read that talk page as being representative of consensus. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan: No problem at all, but after a look at the talk-page discussions, I thought the article and the discussion might benefit from some fresh eyes, and DR-processes are helpful for that. Lectonar (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: I don't disagree. @Nswix: Nswix, please make use of one of the options for getting outside help at dispute resolution. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan: No problem at all, but after a look at the talk-page discussions, I thought the article and the discussion might benefit from some fresh eyes, and DR-processes are helpful for that. Lectonar (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Longer Temporary Semi Protection: Recent high amount of IP block evasion since the last Temporary Semi Protection expired. Coastie43 (talk) 08:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-Protection: It would be just good if the page is downgraded to indefinite semi-protection because editing is well and the website should have more people volunteering to edit article. Avelina925 (talk) 04:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected. The Arbitration Committee has decided that only extended-confirmed editors may edit content involving the Arab-Israeli conflict. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued addition of unsourced material and reversion by IP user(s). Sciencefish (talk) 10:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. GS/PAGENT applies. Courcelles (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. People trolling and vandalizing the page with "Lobotomy dash", "normal difficulty face", "FIRE IN THE HOLE!!!" and other topics taken from Geometry Dash memes. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 13:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is the third regime of protection on a page created in 2005. BusterD (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting a salt lock for this page; it has been deleted 6 times not including the deletions as a redirect. Repeatedly recreated by Symon Sadik. The page Syed Sohel was salted in July for the same reason. Dialmayo (talk) (Contribs) she/her 14:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of Sock vandalism. Azphalt (talk) 14:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- You are an NgfUK sock making extensive restorations of the content you were blocked for adding last year. You are removing good academic sources from the body and adding an infobox full of dubious blog sources, OR and POV captions
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Valuable&diff=prev&oldid=1182483292
- Here is NgfUK making all the same changes Azphalt is now making to the opening
- para and infobox
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Valuable&diff=prev&oldid=1160443046 Expocase (talk) 14:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Perhaps a six month period of extended confirmed protection will give the page a chance to breathe. BusterD (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Azphalt (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it's need to update details of the page........... . Mahhh10 (talk) 03:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Why can't you ask on the talk page? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- The page is protected due to ongoing sockpuppetry from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iptesh Kumar Meher, and Mahhh10 appears to be another such sockpuppet. Belbury (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 13:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial-blocked range. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Will120 (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Will120 (talk) 17:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip hopping vandalism. Will120 (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page persistently sees editors who remove templates for seeming no reason. Mseingth2133444 (Did I mess up? Let me know here | Thank me here) 01:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Correction: seemingly Mseingth2133444 (Did I mess up? Let me know here | Thank me here) 01:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism as IPs try to change the name of the article. Skitash (talk) 11:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I spent an hour trying to validate some information that ended up being vandalism ... I think that medical pages should be set to semi, because they are widely used by the public, and they are also difficult to review for accuracy when pests randomly change values or technical terms [5.0–7.2 mmol/L (90–130 mg/dL)]. • Bobsd • (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, that kind of vandalism could be critically harmful to people. Alternatively, a disclaimer at the top of the page? Probably not the place to discuss this either way. Dialmayo (talk) (Contribs) she/her 17:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected. MEDRS really ought to be a CT/GS thing. Courcelles (talk) 17:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you • Bobsd • (talk) 18:05, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page was previously protected (diffs in link) for ten days. Hours after expiration, disruptive edits resumed by same IP 2601:205:4300:54F0. Editor received 48 hour ban. After expiration, unsourced edits continued yet again.
I have reverted dozens of unsourced, disruptive, and non-WP:RS edits by this user on this page alone since October 2023. This behavior extends to many other pages as well (Max Minghella, for one) and none of my requests in edit summaries or his talk pages have been acknowledged or heeded. Can this page please be protected and something please be done about this WP:NOTLISTENING editor (again)? Rift (talk) 01:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:205:4300:54F0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement- ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 12:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And really, I think it's a serious stretch to put it under PIA, at least the way it's currently being edited. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant disruption by socks of AndresHerutJaim. John Yunshire (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please invoke WP:ARBPIA. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 15:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of vandalism Zinderboff(talk) 15:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Over the past couple of days, some IPs have risen to Trump's defense, apparently prompted by "evidence" revealed by Jesse Watters. The IPs have yet to present this "evidence", only claiming that it exists. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Implements Template:Category disambiguation, which is semi-protected. Therefore, this module should be as well. Theknightwho (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator MusikBot II. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. See recent disruptive account talk page. Probably doesn't need to be long, just long enough to make them give up after a block. 【💬】 18:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- This happened after a recent semi-protect of this page due to similar BLP violations. Maybe longer since the previous one didn't seem to deter. 【💬】 18:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unconstructive edits and violations of the WP:BLP policy. KyleJoantalk 18:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I had already declined the AIV on the IP because they stopped editing after being warned. But protection is an easier argument. I will also put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Various editors actively attempting to expand well beyond the plot length guidelines established by MOS:FILMPLOT. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Will120 (talk) 18:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 19:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is being persistently both promotionally edited and vandalised. BrigadierG (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 19:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another few weeks, thanks. - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Relativity 20:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 20:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's adding unsourced material. Armegon (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Armegon: While I have protected it, there is not much in the way of explanations for the reverts of unsourced changes, either in edit summaries or user talk pages. More explaining would be better as per WP:BITE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
17 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Will120 (talk) 21:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log under CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 22:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Will120 (talk) 21:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Since competition finished, high level of editors disputing who came third in the competition, where the critieria are listed by the event organiser and appropriately referenced. It may just need a week or so for cooling down. Similar request being made to parent article at AFC Asian Cup Matilda Maniac (talk) 22:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Since competition finished, high level of editors disputing who came third in the competition, where the critieria are listed by the event organiser and appropriately referenced. It may just need a week or so for cooling down. Similar request being made to parent article at 2023 AFC Asian Cup Matilda Maniac (talk) 22:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism by IP editor, possibly due to recent election. Ckfasdf (talk) 12:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I assume List of presidents of Indonesia was meant, as this is a redirect that has only been edited twice in its entire existence. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: My mistake, I actually meant President of Indonesia. Ckfasdf (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- In which case,
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- In which case,
- @Daniel Case: My mistake, I actually meant President of Indonesia. Ckfasdf (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Many new accounts/ IPs adding non-notable entries. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Edit today was first in a month. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism by IP editor, possibly due to recent election. Previously, I put wrong wikilink. Ckfasdf (talk) 21:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., as per above. Daniel Case (talk) 21:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper edit warring an article over redirect. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2800:2145:B000:C8:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks Daniel Case (talk) 22:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR TylerBurden (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ARBEE requested as well, if possible. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at the GS page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oops ... looks like another one of these incidents. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of trivial information / in-jokes. Does not happen very often but seems to persist in the article for a while before being reverted, possibly slipping under the radar. Semi-protection would stop this. GnocchiFan (talk) 21:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You could perhaps try adding an inline comment or two in hopes of discouraging it, but there's not enough disruption to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Insistent deletions and alterations of sourced name(s) by IPs and new accounts. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 00:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Sumanuil: I protected it for a long time but did so reluctantly because there is nothing on article talk. There should be a polite explanation that the problematic users could be shown. I know they are unlikely to see it, but we're supposed to make it possible. Johnuniq (talk) 03:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'll try that next time, but should "don't remove sourced content" really require explaining? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Sumanuil: No, new editors are supposed to get a quick explanation mentioning WP:RS and the particular source which supports the current name. Supposing the explanation was in a section called "Name", you would add "please see Talk:Arabic rice#Name" in the reverting edit summary. That is about all we can do to alert the warriors. It also tells other people that good efforts to explain the situation have been made. Johnuniq (talk) 04:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'll try that next time, but should "don't remove sourced content" really require explaining? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular recent vandalism from different IPs. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 01:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Increased vandalism following today's verdict in New York civil investigation of The Trump Organization. Funcrunch (talk) 02:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:54, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 03:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 02:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some anon keep changed number of aircraft constantly for almost one month. Already request page protection in 23 January 2024 and approved by admin for 10 days protection. After that the vandalism repeated. Maybe need to be protected for long period more or indefinitely perhaps? Kistara (talk) 02:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection - recent uptick in IP vandalism Dl2000 (talk) 03:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Due to recent events regarding this indvidual's passing, vandalism will likely be very common. Please increase this article to Extended confirmed. Thanks 🤓 WeaponizingArchitecture | scream at me 🤓 01:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent target of spamming and disruptive editing; low volume of edits. Edits from non-autoconfirmed users could benefit from review. MaterialsPsych (talk) 01:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @MaterialsPsych: Pending changes is supposed to be used after trying semi-protection. It is also a pain because the spam keeps getting added and people have to check it then revert. I don't see anything useful for a long time so have protected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @MaterialsPsych: I'm not questioning your decision, but, unless I have missed something, "Pending changes is supposed to be used after trying semi-protection" is incorrect, and better described extended-confirmed protection. The main reason to go for semi rather than PC is the frequency of the editing. In my view, avoiding reviewers having to look at spam is also a good reason, in borderline cases like this. Yaris678 (talk) 07:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Low Level of Ip vandalism. Would be good if semi-protected indefinitely. 2601:646:8003:6B20:8CE1:84BC:68E9:D11A (talk) 02:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 03:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of ip vandalism 2601:646:8003:6B20:8CE1:84BC:68E9:D11A (talk) 02:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 03:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs Borgenland (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:ARBEE. El_C 06:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Please add this notice at the end:
{{subst:Please see|Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Improper disambiguation redirects|Proposed new CSD criterion}}
thanks. 74.80.182.75 (talk) 21:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Done * Pppery * it has begun... 05:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Currently temp. Semi-protected. Recent Levels of vandalism. Would Be more useful is semi-protected indefinitely. 2601:646:8003:6B20:8CE1:84BC:68E9:D11A (talk) 02:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- I said that it's already temporarily semi protected. 2601:646:8003:6B20:8CE1:84BC:68E9:D11A (talk) 03:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Just because it's semi protected does not mean that it can't be indefinite! 2601:646:8003:6B20:8CE1:84BC:68E9:D11A (talk) 03:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for reminder, but I am confirming that yes, indeed, that it is semi-protected, but it has an expiration. I'm just requesting the protection to be permanent. 2601:646:8003:6B20:8CE1:84BC:68E9:D11A (talk) 03:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment): You're responding to a bot with no will other than doing what it was programmed to do. Fork99 (talk) 04:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for reminder, but I am confirming that yes, indeed, that it is semi-protected, but it has an expiration. I'm just requesting the protection to be permanent. 2601:646:8003:6B20:8CE1:84BC:68E9:D11A (talk) 03:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Just because it's semi protected does not mean that it can't be indefinite! 2601:646:8003:6B20:8CE1:84BC:68E9:D11A (talk) 03:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- I said that it's already temporarily semi protected. 2601:646:8003:6B20:8CE1:84BC:68E9:D11A (talk) 03:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done While it has a lengthy protection log, it's intermittent for short duratons, and I see no reason for permanent semi-protection. Acroterion (talk) 03:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of editorialization, disputed copyright photo usage, speculation, and fluff text from User:DTParker1000. Early instances in August 2023, with renewed edits from user in January 2024. Repeated self-plagiarism of DTParker1000's own text used in other articles such as Rio Grande 268 and D & RG Narrow Gauge Trestle. Xboxtravis7992 (talk) 04:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. @Xboxtravis7992: Warn the user appropriately then report them to WP:ANI if they continue. Note that warning them appropriately does not include accusing them of vandalism. Vandalism has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia:
Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism.
Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 08:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amaury • 09:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There was extremely little or no history of vandalism above an IP level preprotection. Requesting autolock. 2003LN6 05:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I see plenty of vandalism there. If ECP had existed when this was full-protected in 2018, that's what would have been used. Therefore, I have reduced it to ECP. The protection log suggests that semiprotection wasn't working. ~Anachronist (talk) 09:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: No one i s harming the war page. Missbellanash (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. @Missbellanash: There is no article by that name. If you mean Israel–Hamas war, then you are welcome to make an edit request. Be sure your request is of the form "change X to Y" or "add X after Y" or "delete X", and explain your reasoning, citing reliable sources. Vague, nonspecific requests are not actionable and will be declined. ~Anachronist (talk) 09:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring vandalism and/or disruptive edits to infobox since February 1, and intermittently before that (e.g. [96], [97], [98]). Request previously made on February 3 and IP range was blocked, but other IPs continue to make similar disruptions since then (e.g. [99], [100], [101]). R Prazeres (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Three-month semi-protection due to persistent IP edit-warring and disruption, almost exclusively about the terminology "assault rifle". Alternatives to protection have been attempted with failure to prevent the same disruption. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping to Fnlayson, who has been politely and effectively helping with this issue since it cropped up. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:RUSUKR. Mellk (talk) 16:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I saw an error in her Early Life tab KanyesBetter (talk) 03:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Is that claim verified by a source? If so, post the source below and I will consider its reliability. 2003 LN6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 2003LN6 05:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- This request is not specific enough to implement * Pppery * it has begun... 05:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.
Not done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 12:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, various IPs have been violating MOS:TVNOW by changing "is" to "was" repeatedly, IP users should be blocked indefinitely. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:ED93:33A3:420C:896F (talk) 14:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:100f:b100::/42 (talk · contribs). One month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 15:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:BLP violations on a WP:CTOPS article. Subject is post-1992 U.S. politics. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 18:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There has been no tampering with this page, remove the protection. Missbellanash (talk) 14:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined This article is covered by WP:ARBPIA and it's subject to WP:ECR. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- What does "covered by" mean in this context? Missbellanash (talk) 15:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- It is related to the topic. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Missbellanash: It means that it is part of the overarching Israeli-Palestinian conflict topic area, broadly construed. As such, only editors with 30 days' tenure and 500 prior edits are allowed to edit it per the General Sanctions that apply to all pages in the topic area. If you want the protection lifted, you need to file an amendment request; this page cannot unprotect pages protected as Arbitration enforcement. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- What does "covered by" mean in this context? Missbellanash (talk) 15:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There have been no disruptive edits or regular-normal *leaning to* non-disruptive edits to this page. Replace x with y as desired/required. bye Missbellanash (talk) 15:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – @Missbellanash: That's a redirect to the Israel–Hamas war article, which per WP:ARBPIA can only be edited by extended-confirmed users. Changing the redirect would be utterly pointless, as would further requests of this sort. Favonian (talk) 15:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry from a wide range of IPv6s has continued since the previous semiprotection expired. I'm coming to RFPP rather than SPI as - in my experience - page protection is a more useful remedy than IPv6 whack-a-mole in this case. All the best. —a smart kitten[meow] 16:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2405:4802::/32 (talk · contribs). Partial block extended to cover High National Council (South Vietnam) and Battle of Tonlé Sap. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same reason as High National Council (South Vietnam) above. Unexplained restoration of sockpuppet-version after the previous protection expired. (I haven't reverted yet in order to avoid an edit war). —a smart kitten[meow] 16:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2405:4802::/32 (talk · contribs). Partial block extended to cover High National Council (South Vietnam) and Battle of Tonlé Sap. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Favonian: if other pages become involved, what's the best way to request another extension of the partial block? Just so I know what best to do. Best, —a smart kitten[meow] 17:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @A smart kitten: In general, WP:ANI is best. If I happen to be around, drop me a message. Favonian (talk) 17:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Favonian: if other pages become involved, what's the best way to request another extension of the partial block? Just so I know what best to do. Best, —a smart kitten[meow] 17:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring over the past month to change Kolchak's national origin. Note: this is an WP:ARBEE topic. Generalrelative (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indeed, as WP:ARBEE. El_C 22:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
18 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:DE by IP editors. WP:OVERLINK. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 161.74.220.0/23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for six months, and 81.104.111.169 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) blocked sitewide for the same length of time (as they were so blocked for three months of the last year). We'll see what that does.
I suspect these two are the same person, using, I bet, school and work/home accounts, based on where the IPs resolve to). Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The last 4 months of edits to this page are just one unregistered user edit warring with multiple other editors over the genre of the song. Latest protection ended a few days ago, and they're back at it. Onorem (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1003:b000::/41 (talk · contribs). One year partial block from the article in question. May need to upgraded to site-wide – again. Favonian (talk) 20:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and unrelated block evasion since February 12. Panian513 22:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. In line with other letters in the alphabet. El_C 22:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 23:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I'm requesting extended-confirmation protection, because it's part of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and a current event. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 21:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. But feel free to relist if there any disruptive or contested edits by non-WP:XC users (even one such edit). El_C 21:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Xexerss (talk) 23:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from IPs. ButlerBlog (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 00:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed protection required to prevent disruptive editing by Bolt Kjerag who keeps making inappropriate edits like this or this. Number 57 01:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Uptick in IP vandalism. Temporary semi-protection requested. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Same as last time. Johnuniq (talk) 04:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steelkamp (talk) 03:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption, possible sockpuppetry. HistoryofIran (talk) 04:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of generally absurd new user vandalism. Temporary semi-protection requested. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because none of the other TCA Awards pages are semi-protected. Also, I need to change/restore outdated wordings about the 2023 Hollywood labor disputes that are no longer relevant and was unnecessary reverted in November, which caused the year-long semi-protection, I can't wait 9 more months for that and I think we should end it early. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:ED93:33A3:420C:896F (talk) 01:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping as protecting admin @NinjaRobotPirate: was not notified. Zinnober9 (talk) 02:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well, nobody has ever made an edit request on the talk page. The semi-protection doesn't seem to be inconveniencing people very much. If an uninvolved admin thinks it's worth it to unprotect the page, I guess we can just use it as bait, like a honeypot. However, this is a really persistent LTA who makes death threats and returns to the same pages over the course of years. The IP who made that edit is currently blocked for 2 years. I understand that long-term blocks and semi-protection are a pain for uninvolved editors, but the solution is really quite easy: create an account. It's very rare that the pages end up under ECP. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected Johnuniq (talk) 04:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been on indefinite semi-protection since April 2013. I don't see the harm in removing protection completely after a decade. 2600:1000:B12A:1F21:C8C:A1C2:FB3D:5A07 (talk) 03:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected Johnuniq (talk) 04:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Many person trying to vandalise the people of Meitei Pangal Nawajk12 (talk) 04:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason:
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to bring attention to the Wikipedia page for "Meitei Pangal," which has been subject to frequent and inaccurate edits. Unfortunately, various attempts to rectify these changes have been unsuccessful.
To ensure the accuracy and integrity of the information presented on the Meitei Pangal page, I kindly request that you consider implementing page protection. This measure will help prevent further misinformation and maintain the reliability of the content.
I am committed to contributing valid and well-supported information to the page, and I believe that protecting it temporarily will allow for a more thoughtful and accurate representation.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate the work of the Wikipedia community in maintaining a reliable and accessible source of information. Nawajk12 (talk) 04:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 06:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done. @Livelikemusic: With edit summaries like
Per ib
,ONce again, same as before
, andContinued vandalism.
, it's no wonder there is edit warring on this article. Also, it's not vandalism. Read WP:VANDAL. There's not enough disruption to justify protection and it's not surprising there is some disruption given the bitey edit summaries and lack of helpful communication. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism and confusion/trolling over title status. There was a Twitter post recently where he has shown a badge with "grandmaster" on it, although this is most likely a joke and not proof of GM status. Electricmaster (talk) 08:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles. See also the other "current events" pages being edited by Special:Contributions/180.246.192.7. John of Reading (talk) 11:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent IP edits adding unsourced content. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Extend confirmed protection: Addition of too long plot again and again by IP and non-extend confirmed user. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 11:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Yuthoob (talk) 11:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Agent 007 (talk) 11:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page had to be protected on 1 February, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/02#Jannik Sinner. In the meantime Alebir (talk · contribs) tried to make the same kind of changes and was blocked. His block is now under review for the... 3rd time (see User talk:Alebir), but (un)surprisingly 151.60.187.14 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is attempting to make the same kind of edits, already reverted twice since yesterday. I suggest again an increased page protection. Mai-Sachme (talk) 12:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Mike Allen 10:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant unsourced attacks by IPs. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 14:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Harvici (talk) 14:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic that had been compromised with the addition of unreliable references by a user whose same actions also led to the 2024 Pakistani general election being put under page protection. Borgenland (talk) 11:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper attempting to censor article. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of vandalism, for whatever reason. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Harvici (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent suboptimal and unconstructive edits by one IP user with multiple IP addresses. KyleJoantalk 15:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant additions of false informstion about him being Michael Jackson's son by IP editors. ★Trekker (talk) 18:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow edit warring; repeated attempts to reinstate disputed content. See Talk:Thangjing Hill#OR and SYNTHESIS. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CTOPS notice also left on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- List of awards and nominations received by Nayanthara (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since 3 Feb, multiple IPs (IPv4 and IP6) have been changing the # of awards and nominations in the infobox (at least 5 times to numbers that are false) and have been reverted. — Archer1234 (t·c) 15:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption from same IP user resumed immediately after week's semiprotection expired. MrOllie (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See [102], [103]. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] 16:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., so we won't have to do it again under normal circumstances. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent inclusion of poorly sourced and unreliable content despite warnings. Borgenland (talk) 19:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ARBIPA should be enforced here. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I knew it should have been designated as such. But I was wondering why it didn’t generate automatically. Borgenland (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will also leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I knew it should have been designated as such. But I was wondering why it didn’t generate automatically. Borgenland (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed protection as the subject became an UFC champion as of now and due to the current protection, the page is completely outdated. The matter of nationality should not stop the page from being correctly edited by other users. Those that engage in edit warring should be punished for that, not the page. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Page protecting admin was not notified prior to request as required above. Courtesy ping @Daniel Quinlan:. Zinnober9 (talk) 14:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. His article should be semi protected. Can I just remove it? Marty2Hotty (talk) 14:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Gsfelipe94@Marty2Hotty We really need to reach a consensus somewhere about what nationalities and flags were using for him, because the edit warring is getting crazy (even today at UFC Rankings and List of current UFC fighters it has been changed a handful of times). Nswix (talk) 15:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- A discussion should be created on his talk page regarding that and if necessary the pages related to it should be protected from unregistered users. He represents Georgia in the UFC and he's listed related to that country in official medias. He "represents" Spain as well, but that doesn't necessarily mean the flag should be listed alongside or instead the other one. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 15:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- there's two discussions on his talk page and it's just Cassiopeia and I arguing with angry Georgian guys. Nswix (talk) 15:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I've just read it and it seems pointless the way it went through. More editors should be gathered for a constructive discussion. Cassiopeia is usually very stubborn (had a lot of situation with changing fighters' last names recently). I'll reply the same thing I've said above. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- there's two discussions on his talk page and it's just Cassiopeia and I arguing with angry Georgian guys. Nswix (talk) 15:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- A discussion should be created on his talk page regarding that and if necessary the pages related to it should be protected from unregistered users. He represents Georgia in the UFC and he's listed related to that country in official medias. He "represents" Spain as well, but that doesn't necessarily mean the flag should be listed alongside or instead the other one. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 15:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Gsfelipe94@Marty2Hotty We really need to reach a consensus somewhere about what nationalities and flags were using for him, because the edit warring is getting crazy (even today at UFC Rankings and List of current UFC fighters it has been changed a handful of times). Nswix (talk) 15:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected. If someone were to make an edit request that actually follows the edit request guideline by being
followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately
then someone could update the article.Unfortunately, little or no effort has been made by anyone involved in the edit war to resolve the content dispute.Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC)- There is an ongoing discussion at WP:DRN#Ilia_Topuria. Hopefully, we can lower the page protection level soon. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
WRONG INFORMATION Lucifer115 (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done Please carefully read WP:ER before using this board again. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Tyagi's are Kshatriya Brahmin because they are descendants of Lord Parshuram and he is a brahmin who done deeds of Kshatriya so he is considered as Kshatriya Brahmin so Tyagi's are also Kshatriya Brahmin Lucifer115 (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Tyagi is not protected. Favonian (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
19 February 2024
PH Radio Station Templates
- Template:Koronadal Radio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Vigan Radio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Tandag Radio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Antique Radio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Pampanga Radio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP users who add/change incorrect/unconfirmed call letters and frequencies. These templates deserve to be semi-protected indefinitely, similar to Template:Metro Manila Radio and Template:Davao City Radio. ASTIG😎🙃 10:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very little editing at all over the past couple of years, and editors seem more than capable of handling disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 20:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have actually warned them for edit warring, something no one had done yet. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. BangJan1999 22:15, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with this.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from multiple IP addresses Waluigithewalrus (talk) 23:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced or against sourced changes to earnings/values. Seems to be multiple IPs from Brazil region. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and useless edits from an LTA. The entire TP history is just LTA fighting with others. The page (not talk page) was also protected to prevent disruption. Looks like the LTA has now moved onto the talk page. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nothing but vandalism since last protection lapsed. Nswix (talk) 00:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: It's today's featured picture and is picking up lots of vandalism already. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: It Is Not Vandalized! Jeremy2014August (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR. DrowssapSMM 03:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR. DrowssapSMM 03:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR. DrowssapSMM 03:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR. DrowssapSMM 03:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Since December 16, a user using numerous IP addresses has attempted to add unsourced information regarding this wrestler's status as a "heel" or "tweener" despite several editors explaining the information needs to be sourced and not editorialized. Users refuses to accept this and adds false sources stating that it backs this information up when it does not, or just mentions other supporting unreliable websites as a source in the edit summaries. NJZombie (talk) 04:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This was protected 14 years ago. 203.192.209.6 (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- OhanaUnited this was your protection. Comment? — Maile (talk) 23:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I simply re-applied protection after pending changed trial completed. I didn't initiate this protection. OhanaUnitedTalk page 03:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- The talk page is available. I don’t see that 203.192.209.6 has attempted to use it. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Protection duration isn't a valid basis for reducing protection. "Indefinite" means any length of time, and it was set that way for a reason. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring from a couple of Kuwait IPs. Binksternet (talk) 07:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new zero-edit accounts vandalizing within minutes of each other. — Archer1234 (t·c) 09:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per February IP and presumably COI disruption on a BLP-sensitive thing, some protection may be good. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sexual and gender-based violence in the 7 October attack on Israel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Request move protection. Title of this article, which is under Arbitration Committee jurisdiction and is highly contentious, was changed three times by three different editors last night without prior discussion. Article has been restored to its previous name prior to this move-warring. Due to technical glitches, restoration of the previous page title was complex, time-consuming and difficult, and required noticeboard intervention. Coretheapple (talk) 21:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'll need to manually reinstate indef ec move protection when this expires. BusterD (talk) 23:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Note: Any admin is welcome to modify my sudden action as necessary. BusterD (talk) 23:15, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have logged this over at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Bot interprets "Note" as "jury is still out". Favonian (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Harvici (talk) 10:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason:This page is always getting vandalized which I believe also comes from the same person. Every time he gets blocked he creates a new account or uses an IP one. Perhaps protecting it would stop this.Javext (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Isabelle Belato: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. A user added irrelevant names, NFL players and other coaches/executives. 2600:1000:B149:5E2D:9CF4:2853:B78:68C8 (talk) 05:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Bobbieboy1358 (talk · contribs) blocked by K6ka. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of a non-notable person in violation of WP:BLP. --MuZemike 13:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 14:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from sockpuppets, one of which is impersonating the BLP's subject. Panian513 14:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 05:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This page has been at indefinite semi-protection since 2018. I see no active disruption on this page in several years, so the current level of protection seems sufficient per WP:ARBECR. BusterD (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Iam the owner of this label, so i need ad proper information, if not everyone will edit Siddharthmenon2121 (talk) 13:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Are you saying you are Siddharth Menon? If so you have a conflict of interest which you should declare; additionally, you should avoid editing this article. There doesn't appear to be any recent vandalism, so I can't see why this would be protected. — Czello (music) 14:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. This is a likely autobiography, based on page creator and edit history. While we are here to prevent disruption, page protection is not applied to protect one's personal WP:Ownership of autobiographies. BusterD (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Dark-World25 (talk) 16:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: frequent IP vandalism/addition/alteration of information. Agent 007 (talk) 14:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Four days since last edit? BusterD (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 18:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — LeoFrank Talk 15:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of sourced content. ZLEA T\C 14:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Edit warring IP was p-blocked by BusterD. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 16:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done Full protection not needed, but Jauerback did semi-protect it for two days. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent target for vandalism, recently unprotected after a period of protection and now being hit again. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 18:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Some level of protection requested, temporary or indefinite (whichever is more appropriate, given the subject of the page). Disruption by GRP. Phönedinger's jellyfish II (talk) 19:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since January 18. Panian513 19:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The article keep providing misinformation on the coverage availability (vandalism), in which until now, there was no confirmation about which networks in both Brazil and Indonesia will aired the whole matches for this season. VernardoLau (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 17:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent disruptive editing on the article; users adding an unreliable source claiming that the show has been cancelled, when there is no official word on the matter yet. Page was last protected a while ago for the same reason, and no one has listened to it. Until it has been a full year since the last new episode aired, or if a reliable source announced its cancellation, this page MUST be protected until further notice. BrickMaster02 (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Someone do something about this. SOMEONE PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS NOW! BrickMaster02 (talk) 19:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Temporary semi-protection, if there is any protection at all, is likely more appropriate here. It looks like one new editor (who was not appropriately warned about a lack of reliable sources) and an IP, who was also not warned on their lack of reliable sources. Full protection is excessive, and please remember to warn (by template or by a personalized message) editors & IPs for not using reliable sources. Phönedinger's jellyfish II (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's not how protection works. Read WP:PREEMPTIVE. Also, please don't shout. We're all just volunteers. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry. Panian513 18:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism over a possible nationality switch which has not been confirmed in any WP:RS. BRDude70 (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping and SPA attacks all morning. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If the user comes back, we can attempt a block first. Malinaccier (talk) 18:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unconstructive editing by User:DeepstoneV who has been continuously doing disruptive editing by adding false unsourced information [104] without providing credible sources to support their claims. Even I asked him to discuss about it on talk page but they aren't responding [105] Despite multiple requests from myself and others. He seems confused there as at first he says the result should be inconclusive [106] but then changed his mind for editing result as "Saka victory" [107] Shakib ul hassan (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shakib ul hassan, please observe WP:NOTVANDALISM. You can't be asking for a "healthy discussion" while at the same breath calling the contested edits "vandalism" (diff) — that does not align. Thank you. El_C 19:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- I understand the implications of calling the contestant editing "vandalism", It will not be repeated again. Thanks. Shakib ul hassan (talk) 20:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Receiving a significant amount of vandalism since protection expired. Would suggest semi for a while (probably until the end of Eurovision 2024). Elli (talk | contribs) 20:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Favonian (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
20 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal blanking sections. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Explain the vandal part, please. 91.148.94.117 (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 91.148.94.117 (talk · contribs) blocked by Malinaccier. for 31 hours. I have also put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A week must be enough to stop the editwarring and POV-pushing. The Banner talk 19:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent unconstructive editing by User:Kemilliogolgi. He's citing sources are not only unreliable ([108] [109] [110] [111]) but also using a source which is sourced from Wikipedia itself. [112].Seems like User:Kemilliogolgi hasn't gone through WP:RS
Shakib ul hassan (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Aoidh (talk) 21:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Recently expired protection, Infobox edit war over result from a war in Eastern Europe has resumed. See article history. // Timothy :: talk 23:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Different IPs have either been trying to remove a sentence in the open against apparent consesnsus or editing it in a disruptive fashion [113] for the past 5 days. Skynxnex (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That's why you came to me, isn't it, Skynxnex? Because you knew I could do those things that you weren't capable of doing? Well, it worked. And you'll get what you want: no more unconfirmed editors editing the Elim Garak article for an entire year. And if your conscience is bothering you, you should soothe it with the knowledge that you may have just saved several more people from having to revert these disruptive edits. And all it cost was a few keystrokes and clicks, one log entry under WP:CT/GG, and the self-respect of everyone reading this response. I don't know about you, but I'd call that a bargain. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- The deal of the day. Thanks. Skynxnex (talk) 02:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continued vandalism from IP users Arcturus95 (talk) 02:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect, thanks. Arcturus95 (talk) 03:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:AP2. El_C 03:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Too many vandalism. Naz soon (talk) 03:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple unregistered accounts ignoring multiple warnings of changing flag without going to talk page to see or discuss reasons into possible changes. For example an unregistered user changed the flag without reading the Talk page to why it was changed here: [114], it happened again here: [115], and it also again happened here [116], all these were confronted by me by giving an edit backlog which stated to not do so without going to the talk page, source: [117],[118]. I had discussed why the Lion of Judah flag was changed to the plain, green, yellow, red flag on the bottom of the talk page here [119] with this user User:Socialwave597, while we had a fruitful conversation regarding the adding of the flag due to my stance of making the Plain flag on the infobox which followed WP:SCHOLARSHIP rule, me and the user determined at the end that a high quality flag of the plain should be added, to be noted they also said they also wanted the Imperial lion of Judah flag to be next to the Infobox using the example of the Derg page, which had no other flag besides 1, so i went forth without any more objections from any other user to the talk page, and made the plain flag which is the national flag of the Ethiopian Empire, according to the sources which i listed at the talk page. So the gist is, please do not let users with 1 2-3 edits and newly created accounts to edit the page, who have showed more than likely to ignore the talk page. CtasACT (talk) 03:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:HORN. El_C 03:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 03:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unsourced removal of content and readditions of unbilled cast member to billing order after prior protection expired. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: persistent vandalism 2600:1000:B153:8CF:3C30:AD6E:F01C:508F (talk) 00:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Having any protection at all is probably overkill; especially since editing has been halted the past few months. 2600:1000:B153:8CF:1496:EFE6:73D3:1DEB (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected There hasn't been vandalism because the article is protected from vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing on the article; users adding in a supposed end date for the series, when it hasn't been officially confirmed by the network (outside of a few TV promos). Similar to Erin & Aaron, the article should be protected temporarily until further notice. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Note: @BrickMaster02: I'm on the fence so I'm going to let another administrator decide. I can't help but wonder if there isn't a better solution for television shows. We allow DOB to be sourced from social media, we allow sports transactions to be confirmed by the athlete, etc. I don't know what a better solution would look like, especially one compatible with WP:RS, but in the absence of a solution, perhaps a specific warning template like
{{Current sports transaction}}
would help. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Sock puppetry and disruptive editing Magherbin (talk) 04:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:HORN. El_C 05:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article creations against the consensus established by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bapaiya. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Enforcing AfD outcome as redirect. El_C 05:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from unsourced changes to the Infobox (with WP:FRINGE playing in), talk page also explains. Noorullah (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- added comment: page has also been protected before for disruptive editing. Noorullah (talk) 00:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I would like to request semi-protection for the article "Raid of Ahmednagar (1657)" due to consistent changes in the results and outcomes by users relying on a limited number of sources without providing multiple authenticated sources. Please review the sources and determine whether the event should be classified as a Mughal victory or a Maratha victory. Additionally, it is important to maintain the article semi-protected from anonymous users. Thank you. User:Shakib ul hassan -The individual in question has made multiple attempts to modify the content with limited sources and has altered the previously added results from the original article creator. I request that appropriate measures be taken against this person. Kemilliogolgi (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Please use the article talk page for its intended prupose. Neither one of you has done that. In fact, no one has done that, ever. El_C 04:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. — Czello (music) 08:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This article needs more eyes, definitely. I am not even sure a separate article should exist, most of the info provided should be merged into other articles. Lectonar (talk) 09:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Editor ignorant of RS policy repeatedly adding a claim that is contradicted by RS's — kwami (talk) 07:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If the issue is with a single editor, consider dispute resolution, ANEW, or ANI as appropriate. - Aoidh (talk) 07:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There appears to be a persistent pattern of socking and disruptive against consensus reached at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Riudavets (2nd nomination) which still seems pertinent. I am seeking protection equivalent to salting of a non-redirect title. Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 13:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newly released game with apparently long loading screens. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- For super-Earth! El_C 13:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – per Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict and vandalism. Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 13:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Add Guest appearance on This week with George Stepanopoulous Show on Sunday 18 February 2024, where he discussed the November 2024 presidential election by saying the election was a choice between a Crook, a Coward or the Couch. 2601:196:200:65F0:183B:3580:8401:863C (talk) 04:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Charlamagne tha God is not protected. Favonian (talk) 06:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was previously semiprotected indefinitely, but protection was removed by Jpgordon. Disruption has resumed and regularly recurred after the protection was removed. MaterialsPsych (talk) 13:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 14:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism. Wikipedialuva (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Addition of unsourced content by IP editors. This page has been protected in the past for same thing so I believe and indefinite protection should be given to this page. – sbaio 16:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 17:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: ECP is unnecessary, page is not a high vandal target. Ccole2006 (talk) 14:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Article is protected as a target of a very persistent and still active sock master. Favonian (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 16:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 17:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Dev Adhi (talk) 17:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Which should get us through this year's elections. Daniel Case (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Added CTOPS notice to the talk page, and I have decided to log it as well because of the length of time. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the user who ordered the protection did so 13 years ago and the user is now retired. ....... . Mintyfoetus (talk) 04:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see how their retirement affects the need for protection. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined It appears there have been two edit requests on the talk page in the last 10 years, the last one was responded to in less than a day, so the burden isn't so high that an IP can't use the talk page of this BLP. Dennis Brown 2¢ 14:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruption over pronouns from non-autoconfirmed editors. While crimew does primarily use it/its pronouns, she has also indicated that she/her is acceptable in formal contexts including her Wikipedia article. Sideswipe9th (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. A legitimate discussion that should not be settled by non-autoconfirmed edits to the article. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism and removal of sourced content by multiple disruptive IPs. Skitash (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject has a young audience and is acquainted with MrBeast who also has a big audience. The page has been vandalized quite a lot since the last protection so I suggest an indefinite protection for the time being. WanderingMorpheme 17:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ongoing IP disruptive editing regarding team captain Wikipedialuva (talk) 15:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A sudden increase in various IPs trying to change the ethnic origin of the individual and deletion of sourced content. Ixudi (talk) 15:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 15:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High Level of IP Vandalism and disruptive editing. Wowlastic10 (talk) 15:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR. I'm surprised it wasn't indef ECP'd back in 2022. DrowssapSMM 18:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by new accounts and IPs and block evasion. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No IPs have edited the article in 49 days. Did you mean to report issues on a different article? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: We are starting to see vandalism and NPOV related to a recent death that occurred in relation to the school, which is now getting international news coverage. The page views have skyrocketed and as this story moves further up in the news, we're going to see more of it. – TCMemoire 19:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I don't understand why ECP is even necessary here. There are many more high-profile people who have articles, such as Princess Diana and Charles III, that have done just fine without ECP. Yet, there's ECP for a former gubernatorial candidate (who lost) who's been of the spotlight since. 2600:1000:B142:B945:C5A:5170:DADC:4540 (talk) 18:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of IP vandalism related to a recent expose related to malpractice allegations. – TCMemoire 19:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-Protection High level of editing over the last 24 hours from three obvious WP:COI accounts which currently are being investigated at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Siddharthmenon2121. All three accounts are adding unsourced information to the article. NJZombie (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Might I suggest a longer semi edit protection? The Netflix series Griselda based upon the life of Blanco is still fresh in people's minds and there is still a bunch of disruptive editing going on. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:PIA. I'm not sure if I should mark this as temporary or indefinite duration so I'm just gonna submit this as indefinite. Shadow311 (talk) 15:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. At this point I'm not seeing any evidence suggesting that the existing indef PC isn't working. Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Shadow311 (talk) 20:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I made a mistake here, WP:CT/BLP doesn't apply so the pending-changes protection duration is now 3 months, but please resubmit if disruption resumes. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
21 February 2024
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IPs and new users, who added irrelevant notes 2600:1000:B142:B945:81EE:4F9F:40C7:3A2D (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MaterialsPsych (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Recent vandalism, unsourced claims and use of unreliable sources. More specifically:
- In the past three months, since considerable updates and improvements, it has suffered from considerable instability.
- It's GA co-nomination, and without further protection, it's nomination will likely need to be dropped due to this.
- It's a high-profile/traffic BLP that has repeatedly created a "moth to the flames" type scenario.
- There are currently more reverts to the page than useful contributions.
Extended-confirmed protection as semi-protection is failing.
CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 23:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. This is pretty borderline. On the one hand, the cadence of unsourced and questionable edits is not really that much more than we would typically see with a high-profile article. On the other hand, the article is already under indefinite semi-protection and the nature of some of the unsourced and questionable edits to this BLP are of a sensitive nature. Indefinite is applied with the understanding that "indefinite" is not synonymous with "permanent". Chetsford (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism /disruptive editing by IP editors. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 21:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a lot of blanking and vandalism to this page as of late. I think a 30 day protection is needed for the time being. Lindsey40186 (talk) 22:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Nijisanji keeps being added by IP's dispite there being no reliable sources and unspoken agreement among loged in editors that it should not be included (see the page's history). GrayStorm(Talk|Contributions) 23:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from the same user across different IPs. ItsCheck (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ItsCheck, you are displaying gross incompetence that amount to defamatory statements against a living person. You need to be way more careful moving on, or sanctions of considerable severity will become imminent. Thank you. El_C 01:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High degree of vandalism. On Feb 13th, admin Daniel Case increased page protection to require admin access. The protection expired on Feb 20th. Immediately afterwards the page was vandalized again. Instantwatym (talk) 03:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. It was reprotected almost 5 hours ago. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Experiencing vandalism basically every day, similar to Looksmaxxing. This article needs some expansion, though, so I think pending changes would allow for people who aren't more dedicated contributors to help out. TLAtlak 02:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:18, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated IP efforts to disparage subject's trans status. Nat Gertler (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits by a sockpuppet's[120] IP address Socialwave597 (talk) 04:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:HORN. El_C 09:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the last month, IP addresses have attempted to add promotional content and/or removed large portions of controversy information in an attempt to whitewash. CNMall41 (talk) 05:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, unexplained removal of content. Waxworker (talk) 05:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sexual and gender-based violence in 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 07:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism that went under my radar, and I am not able to restore the article to normalcy. I also cannot monitor the article 24x7 as I have a job and Twinkle doesn't work on mobile mode. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unrefenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 10:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone is vandalising the article using multiple accounts. — AP 499D25 (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP range keeps on adding unsourced census data [121] [122] [123] [124] [125]. This person has been doing it for years now. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level vandalism, both IP and newly created users. The same pattern has been followed throughout months. Requesting for a long term protection. Imperial[AFCND] 11:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 11:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, both IP and recently created account SQ Mags. Wikishovel (talk) 11:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several editors (both new accounts and IPs) keep removing the "Housing policy" section of the article without adequate explanation. — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy- 13:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:COVIDCT. El_C 14:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please invoke WP:ARBCOVID. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Uh, it's the same thing. El_C 14:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be potential off-site organizing, per ANI. Remsense诉 13:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 14:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: An uncorrobated report circulating that Israel may be disqualified, anticipating vandalism Pdhadam (talk) 14:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:PIA, WP:ECR related content. Anticipating? It's already happening. El_C 14:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Guy du Temple de Rougemont, known as Guy de Rougemont, born April 23, 1935 in Paris and died August 19, 2021 in Montpellier, is a French painter, watercolorist, draftsman and sculptor, having spent a large part of his life between Paris and Marsillargues , in the south of France. A multidisciplinary artist, he seeks to remove the border between the arts, particularly between sculpture and painting, and intervenes in everyday places, in squares and in the streets, while creating objects and furniture. Among his famous works are his Cloud table (1970) designed for the decorator Henri Samuel (1904-1996), his Coloring of a Museum (1974), a temporary artistic intervention during which he covered strips of Colored PVC columns of the Museum of Modern Art of the City of Paris, as well as his Environment for a highway, where he installed urban sculptures over 30 km along the A4 highway section La Veuve-Sainte Ménéhould, France (1977 ). Member of the Academy of Fine Arts, he was the son of General Jean-Louis du Temple de Rougemont (1910–1990). Biography Childhood and family Guy du Temple de Rougemont was born on April 23, 1935 in Paris. His father, Jean-Louis du Temple de Rougemont (1910-1990) was a Cavalry Officer. His mother, Louise Marie Cécile Lejeune10 (1913-2002), is the descendant through her father of General Baron Lejeune (1775-1848), battle painter. Through her mother, Marguerite Murat (1886-1956), she is the descendant of Caroline Murat (1782-1839), sister of Napoleon I. Guy de Rougemont is the eldest of five children. His brother, François de Rougemont, is a civil engineer and graduate of Harvard Business School. Her sister, Cécile Marie Edith du Temple de Rougemont (1936-2000), Duchess of Lorges, was a student of André Chastel (1912-1990) at the Institute of Art History and allowed her to discover Florence, guided by the illustrious art historian himself. His second sister, Laure, Princesse de Beauvau Craon (1943-2017), was President of Sotheby’s in France. Finally, his younger sister, Anne de Rougemont, was the assistant of Aimé Maeght, then attached to the I.C.O.M, and a member of the Association of Friends of the Georges Pompidou Museum, before being the assistant of Madame David -Weill, President of the Union of Decorative Arts, a union itself created by Monsieur Taigny, great-grandfather of Madame Louise Lejeune, mother of the artist. Youth and training Guy de Rougemont was exposed to art very early on, because his American paternal grandmother introduced him to watercolors very early on. After the Second World War, Jean-Louis du Temple de Rougemont was appointed deputy military attaché in Great Britain. Guy de Rougemont spends his holidays there, which allows him to visit London museums. He lived for five years in a boarding school in Normandy, at the Roches Normandie school. In 1957, his father was appointed to the Pentagon as part of the Atlantic Pact, so the whole family moved to Washington for a year, where Guy de Rougemont attended an American school and exhibited his first watercolor. His schooling ended at the Cours Bergson in Paris. In 1953, he prepared for the École Nationale Supérieure des Arts Décoratifs (ENSAD), in the studio of the painter Bernard Cathelin (1919-2004), rue de la Grande Chaumière. He was admitted to Arts-Déco in Paris on May 24, 1954 and studied painting during his training - notably in the studio of Marcel Gromaire - and quickly participated in his first exhibitions, first abroad. In 1962, he presented his pictorial work at the d'Arcy Galleries in New York then at the Ateneo Mercantil gallery in Valencia in 19646. He stayed from 1962 to 1964 at the Casa de Velázquez in Madrid after obtaining a state scholarship, where he became friends with Jean Canavaggio. He participated in the Paris Biennale of 1965 and the Salon de Mai of 1966, at the invitation of the painter Jean Messagier. He spent 1965 in New York, with his friends Jean and Irène Amic, where he met young artists on the New York scene such as Andy Warhol, Robert Indiana and Frank Stella. He opens up to large format acrylic paint, measuring the strength of simplified, refined shapes and the power of solid color. His work is often assimilated to the movements of Pop art and Minimalism, whose forms he draws inspiration from, without claiming to be so. Arnaud d'Hauterives, permanent secretary of the Institut de France, evokes this founding trip during the reception of Guy de Rougemont under the dome, a few decades later: "This stay will be a revelation for you, you will receive the 'true lesson' of the great French painters that you admire, Léger, Matisse, Bonnard, seen through another eye, that is to say removed from all appearances. » The work Geometric abstraction from 1965 After his return from New York, Guy de Rougemont radically changed his artistic practice. From then on, four major periods can be outlined in his career, defined from the geometric shapes he uses to compose his works. In 1965, he introduced the ellipse, which he developed on the surface of his canvas. In 1967, at the request of his friend Gérard Gaveau6, responsible for advertising for Fiat automobiles, he created his first environment in the Fiat hall, on the Champs-Élysées in Paris. He places canvases cut out in the shape of ellipses in the exhibition space, establishing a dialogue between art and automobiles. Following this event, he created his first objects in volume. During the 1970s, he used the cylinder, a geometric shape that he considered to be the perfect combination of circles and lines. He uses it to place his polychrome volumes in space, creating large cylinders, also nicknamed "totems", "columns" or even "beacons", which take place in urban space, as on Place Albert Thomas in Villeurbanne, or in the interior space, with small sculptures. The Coloring of a Museum, at the Museum of Modern Art of the City of Paris in 1974, marks the peak of his use of the cylinder. The artist covers the twenty columns of the museum portico with colored PVC, in an ephemeral manner, playing with borders, placing his work between interior and exterior, on the museum square13. At the end of the decade and particularly during the 1980s, the artist put aside the cylinder, favoring the raster surface. He created one of his major works in 1986, the mosaic of colored marbles which adorns the pavement of the Bellechasse square, in front of the Orsay Museum. Finally, from the 2000s and until the end of his life, the artist deployed the serpentine line, marking a return to the use of curved shapes. Urban sculptures and installations Among his many achievements, let us mention those of the Saint-Louis hospital, the Marne-la-Vallée RER station, the square in front of the Orsay museum, the Hakone Open Air Museum in Japan, and the Place Albert-Thomas in Villeurbanne, the Hofgarten of Bonn, the metropolitan park of Quito in Ecuador, the reception and care center of Nanterre, where he created a 300 meter long mural, the sculptures of the A4 motorway between Châlon- en-Champagne and Sainte-Ménéhould, the paving carpet 140 meters long and comprising 28 types of colored marble, called "the great ribbon" located in the Pierre Beregovoy hall of the Colbert building, at the French Ministry of Finance located in the district from Bercy (Paris 12th). Many monumental sculptures are also commissioned for private collections in Dubai, Marrakech and Mallorca, among others. The graphic work Guy de Rougemont is a painter and lithographer. During his trip to New York, Guy de Rougemont also learned the technique of screen printing, originally used by the Americans to mark crates of goods using the stencil system, which was later taken up by artists for their graphic research. One of them was Andy Warhol, whom Guy de Rougemont met through his roommate in New York, the painter Marisol. On his return to France, Guy de Rougemont produced numerous screen prints. He is one of the figures who introduced the practice of screen printing in France, at the time of the events of May 1968, at the Atelier populaire des beaux-arts. He told Laurent Gervereau, in 1988, how this happened: “On May 14, it must be half past nine, ten o'clock in the evening. I come home and there is a general meeting. In this general assembly, I recognize a certain number of my painter friends who see me, who wave to me. The Beaux-Arts lithography workshop is in the process of producing a poster… […] I speak up and say that I know a quick, easy, inexpensive process to implement… And my comrades, my friends, make me responsible. They tell me: “that’s very good, since you know that, tomorrow morning you bring us the equipment and we’ll start a screen printing workshop…”. This is how he became the technician of the popular fine arts workshop, but he always maintained that he had not designed any posters himself. For several years, he shared his studio in Marais, rue des Quatre Fils, with his friend Éric Seydoux, with whom he produced screen prints for other artists and for various social events. Guy de Rougemont is also a furniture designer. In 1969, for his exhibition at the Suzy Langlois gallery in Paris, he presented his first “Volumes” in cardboard and published his first carpet, called Free Form Carpet6, which marked the beginning of his research in the third dimension. In 1970, he designed his famous Nuage table ("cloud" coffee table, in English), for the decorator Henri Samuel, and the same year, he published a cloud lamp and various utility objects, such as a placemat, with the Germain Gallery in Paris. In 1974, he collaborated with the Manufacture des Gobelins for whom he created a tapestry, The 7 Pillars of Wisdom, presented at the Lausanne Tapestry Biennale in 1977. From the 1980s, he published several sets of furniture with Artcurial: the Transparences furniture, the Diderot furniture in 1986 and the Du Deffand furniture in 1989, in homage to Madame du Deffand, a famous 18th century letter writer, who three centuries earlier , lived and held his Literary Salon in the artist's studio, rue des Quatre-Fils. The last years Widower of actress Anne-Marie Deschodt (1938–2014), he lived mainly in Marsillargues during his last years. He continued to collaborate with the Diane de Polignac gallery in Paris, with which he created furniture pieces and exhibitions, as well as with the Galerie du Passage, where he exhibited for the last time in 2017. Recognition and posterity A member of the Institute, he was elected member of the Academy of Fine Arts, painting section, on December 17, 19973 in the chair of Jean Bertholle. He was Commander of the Order of Arts and Letters. In 2022, he will benefit from an exhibition "Homage to Guy de Rougemont"24 at the Bouvet-Ladubay Center in Saumur (Val de Loire), organized with the participation of the Diane de Polignac gallery. His works are also present in important collections, notably at the Museum of Modern Art in Paris, the Museum of Decorative Arts, the International Museum of the Salvador Allende Resistance (Santiago de Chile), the National Center of Plastic Arts and the Museum of modern and contemporary art in Saint-Étienne. Guy de Rougemont had no children. The joint ownership formed by his heirs — his brother, his sister Anne and his nephews — is managed by his nephew Laurent de Rougemont and his wife Sophie de Rougemont. The exhibitions Personal and group exhibitions (selection) Personal exhibition, Galerie Suzy Langlois, Paris, 1969. Collective exhibitions, Galerie Karl Flinker, Paris, 1965, 198028. Personal exhibitions, Galerie Cupillard, Grenoble, 1974, 1983 Personal exhibitions, Galerie Pascal Gabert, Paris, 1987, 199229, 2005, 2007. Personal exhibition, Galerie Gamarra y Garrigues30, Madrid, 1988, 1989 (FIAC), 1990 (ARCO collective) Personal and collective exhibitions, Galerie Maeght, Paris and Barcelona, 1998, 1999. Rougemont retrospective at the Museum of Modern Art of the City of Paris, Paris, 1974. Rougemont Retrospective, Public Spaces and Decorative Arts 1965-1990, at the Museum of Decorative Arts, Paris, from May 22 to August 19, 1990. On this occasion, the texts of Yvonne Brunehammer, Daniel Marchesseau, Bernard Chapuis and Bernard Minoret are published in the exhibition catalogue. Personal exhibitions, Galerie du Passage, Paris, 2003, 2010, 2017. Participation in fairs and exhibitions Salon de Mai, Paris, 1966 Salon de Mai, Havana, 1967 Salon de la Jeune Peinture, Paris, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971 International Print Biennial, Paris, 1968 Tokyo Print Biennale, 1969 Salon des Réalités Nouvelles, Paris, 1970 Salon Grands et Jeunes d’Aujourd’hui, Paris, 1975, 1976, 1977 Lausanne Tapestry Biennale, 1977, 1979 Salon de Montrouge, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1987 Salon of Decorative Artists, 1985 Retrospective, Pavilion of Arts and Design (PAD) Tuileries, Paris, Galerie Diane de Polignac, 2013 |
Julie Karin G (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Looks suspiciously like a machine translation of fr:Guy de Rougemont. Furthermore, it lacks reliable sources. Please propose changes at Talk:Guy de Rougemont. Favonian (talk) 12:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP Users. Again. Aloha27 talk 12:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – protection duration 2 months. Adnan (ᵀᵃˡᵏ) 12:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Two IP editors (probably the same person given their locations) repeatedly adding verbose plot details to the lede. Requesting a short period of semi-protection. Barry Wom (talk) 14:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Two IP editors (probably the same person given their locations) repeatedly adding verbose plot details to the lede. Requesting a short period of semi-protection. Barry Wom (talk) 14:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: the game has become far less relevant therefore the chance of vandalism has decreased Radon difluoride (talk) 14:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Still plenty of idiotic edits related to that topic. Favonian (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Add an image of the tortured poets department (Redacted) Eliinjic (talk) 14:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – That image may only be used in the infobox of the article about the album. See File:Taylor Swift – The Tortured Poets Department (album cover).png#Summary. Favonian (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Editors keep removing the misconceptions section without taking to the talk page first to get consensus. Catfurball (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 3 different IP editors have vandalised the page in the last hour Shaws username . talk . 17:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please upgrade protection to semi. Page persistently sees IP editors who remove maintenance and "unreliable source" templates. Previously upgraded to PC protection but that has not helped. Mseingth2133444 (Did I mess up? Let me know here) 18:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article has been edited by at least 4 LOCK177 sockpuppets in the last couple of months. Other edits by non-confirmed accounts/IPs appear to also be adding unsourced content. Pinging Courcelles as you closed the SPI where I also requested semiprotection (but without specifying specific articles), as I don't want to be seen to be adminshopping. All the best. —a smart kitten[meow] 18:11, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I had done a few off the SPI, but not this one. Done now. Courcelles (talk) 20:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
22 February 2024
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oatsandcream socks/IPs adding unsourced content. Belbury (talk) 15:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 174.3.207.112 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from numerous IP users; adding that the show is supposedly ending tonight, only based off of TV promos and nothing else. Main page was recently protected for the same reason, and if this doesn't get temporarily protected, their disruptive edits will continue. BrickMaster02 (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism including homophobic slurs. Agentdoge (talk) 21:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will update log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 21:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 23:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. The edit history is a list of reverts, and given its status as upcoming, protection may be benifical Geardona (talk to me?) 23:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This should hold through the album's release. Daniel Case (talk) 02:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism and disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts in the last two days or so. — AP 499D25 (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. Two days difference, not too bad. El_C 02:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from the range 2600:1000:B100:0:0:0:0:0/41. Worth noting there's an account creation checkuser block on that IP range, not sure if it can be updated to add the article as well. — AP 499D25 (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I honestly don't know what specified non-editing actions is. Maybe it's a CU thing...? HTH. El_C 02:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- The report said the range is blocked from creating accounts. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, I've done that many times, but never seen it displayed in the block log. Maybe that's a new feature...? El_C 02:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- The report said the range is blocked from creating accounts. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: vandalized by an ip twice and then edited by a promotion-only account within the past week, can somebody semi-protect this for a week or two, or at least until a clear consensus on its AfD is reached? 108.49.72.125 (talk) 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined I don't see enough disruption to justify doing this mid-AfD. If it's kept, we could consider it again. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users keep adding that the series is ending without reading hidden notes. Need stronger protection and a longer extension. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 02:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Please try explaining our policies and guidelines first, though. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users keep adding that the series is ending without reading hidden notes. Need stronger protection and a longer extension. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 02:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue.. Also, the edit summaries are not sufficiently explaining these reversions. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Non-logged in user is submitting copyrighted text from https://www.ottawatitans.com/history . isaacl (talk) 03:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreation of Bhavana Studios that was previously deleted multiple times and is protected. It sounds like a case of WP:GAMING and WP:COI. GSS 💬 06:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protect. Anon keeps reverting to a preferred version that is now how we write disambiguation pages. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 18:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- The anon in question opposes, because my edits are consistent with relevant style guidelines, to which SMcCandlish wishes to make an ad-hoc exception. 2601:642:4600:BE10:54F3:2873:7310:F05C (talk) 19:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. They're on the talk page. Let's try talking. Report them to WP:ANI if necessary, but it's not there at this point. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's getting worse. The IP is intent on revert-warring until they get what they want, and now accusing of "vandalism" when opposed. This needs to stop. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 21:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Why did you protect this? There were no further edits from the IP editor after I declined the request. The IP editor had posted to the talk page (nobody has replied) and then SMcCandlish claimed it's getting worse, but I only see good faith edits. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- If you would like to unprotect it, go ahead. Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Question: @SMcCandlish: How is it getting worse since 19:43 UTC? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, I have unprotected. @SMcCandlish: Per this discussion, please respond to the IP on the article talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- A) I already said how it's getting worse, by the anon accusing people of "vandalism" for daring to disagree; b) I've already opened a broader input discussion at WT:MOSDAB since pretty much no one watchlists Talk:Hustler or much of any other DAB talk page. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- I gave the anon a link to that discussion on the talk page, per the standard courtesy. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- @SMcCandlish: I looked at the whole situation when I declined the request. You've equivocally responded that
It's getting worse
andnow accusing
which succeeded in getting another administrator to briefly protect the article. And now you've moved the discussion to your preferred venue without responding to the other editor's attempt to initiate a conversation on the talk page, even just to inform them of the new discussion. That seems like an inordinate amount of WP:GAMING to win a disagreement over one line in a disambiguation page. Daniel Case even asked you to respond. Finally, "vandalism" being asserted is an opportunity for education, not carte blanche. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)- The anon obviously followed me immediately to this venue, there was no reason to expect them not to follow to the other. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- A) I already said how it's getting worse, by the anon accusing people of "vandalism" for daring to disagree; b) I've already opened a broader input discussion at WT:MOSDAB since pretty much no one watchlists Talk:Hustler or much of any other DAB talk page. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- If you would like to unprotect it, go ahead. Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Why did you protect this? There were no further edits from the IP editor after I declined the request. The IP editor had posted to the talk page (nobody has replied) and then SMcCandlish claimed it's getting worse, but I only see good faith edits. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Replying again for the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's getting worse. The IP is intent on revert-warring until they get what they want, and now accusing of "vandalism" when opposed. This needs to stop. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 21:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP invasion + Repetitive vandalism with no reasons. Turtle Historian (talk) 06:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is unnecessary because it wasn't vandalized before its unnecessary semi-protected, there was no reason to semi-protect it despite the account being blocked, this goes for all the other pages that was just semi-protected. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:C0C6:7687:D3C1:DA03 (talk) 04:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: It was literally just protected, and the article's history indicates it's hardly "unnecessary". - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined as it was protected to prevent block evading editors from editing, and it appears to be working as advertised. The same for the others, which I already checked out. Dennis Brown 2¢ 06:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- List of programs broadcast by Sony Entertainment Television (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Addition of unsourced content again and again. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 03:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the last two weeks or so, new accounts have been constantly adding an inappropriate link in the article. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This vandalism resumed immediately after the page came off a ~1 year semi-protection. Aoidh (talk) 09:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the last two weeks or so, new accounts have been constantly adding an inappropriate link in the article. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The majority of edits going back to 2022 are vandalism and reverting of said vandalism. - Aoidh (talk) 09:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Snokalok (talk) 18:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting indefinite semi Snokalok (talk) 18:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. This can be justified as WP:GENSEX enforcement. Sideswipe9th (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- I've semi-protected this article for 24 hours as a stopgap against disruptive editing while discussion continues here about longer protection. — The Anome (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- On that note, to all those reading, the justification I believe for indefinite protection is that ultimately this being a GENSEX article makes it at all times a target for IP vandalism, but its inevitable low traffic once the news cycle moves on means that such vandalism may take a while for anyone to actually notice and correct. Thus, an easy filter against this is indefinite semi. Snokalok (talk) 18:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's a relatively new article, though ... my feeling is deciding now that it needs indef semi is a little pre-emptive (although based on past GENSEX protections, particularly the very similar Murder of Brianna Ghey, it's likely headed that way). We should give the community its chance to protect the article, or at the very least not impose indef semi without some sort of consensus. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- I dunno Daniel Case. There were around a dozen reverts earlier today related to deadname violations, there have been maybe half a dozen pronoun changes, and several other disruptive edits surrounding the killed teen's gender. I'm all for giving the community a chance to protect the article, but I think exhausting the community for something that could be more gracefully handled with semi-protection is not a great idea. With just the deadname violations from earlier, I'm already halfway to the 3RR brightline, and another editor is technically over it though a BLP/BDP exemption justification could be made.
- Due to the circumstances surrounding the death of this teen, it's adjacency to the perennial culture war machine Libs of TikTok, and as you admit the similarities to Murder of Brianna Ghey, I really don't think we're in pre-emptive territory here. I think we're in prevention of ongoing disruption territory. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- I second this position. Even after the news has died down, this will remain one of those critical subjects that will continue receiving just enough attention that reverting vandalism on this article will remain a potentially infrequent, but consistent chore for editors. I find it more reasonable to consider semi-protection an act of preventative maintenance. Agentdoge (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't disagree. But we should still have some sort of formal allowance for "ECP and 1RR from the get-go" in the case of articles about, or mostly about, individuals whose gender identity calls for different pronouns and/or attracts deadnaming. This is so common with trans or NB individuals that I would defy you to find an article about one where this hasn't had to be done.
But it is nevertheless an extraordinary step to take that, like the other four where this kind of protection is permitted ... to my recollection, Armenia-Azerbaijan articles directly related to the conflict, Arab-Israeli conflict articles very broadly construed (especially in the present situation), the Russo-Ukrainian War and South Asian castes, tribes or ethnicities. All of those as far as I know are the product of some discussion that concluded that pre-emptive protection is justified in these cases. And I would very much prefer we had this discussion in this instance rather than reinvent this particular wheel everytime the subject comes up, because tacitly encouraging this kind of administrative IAR behavior has not always led to the best results in the past. Daniel Case (talk) 21:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
But we should still have some sort of formal allowance for "ECP and 1RR from the get-go" in the case of articles about, or mostly about, individuals whose gender identity calls for different pronouns and/or attracts deadnaming
It's funny you say that, because I had previously been thinking that perhaps the provisions of WP:ARBECR should be extended to cover GENSEX. That's not without its own issues though, the recent discussions on the scope of the "edit requests only" have revealed some of the shortcomings of that approach. I think though, because GENSEX is an ArbCom set of sanctions and not the community enacted General Sanctions, such a request would have to go through ARCA, at least as the first port of call. Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)- I totally agree. That is exactly what I am advocating.
- Where should we open such a discussion? Daniel Case (talk) 22:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- This'd probably need a little bit of planning first, at least to get evidence in support of the request together. After that, it'd be an amendment request at WP:ARCA. Ultimately the decision is up to ArbCom. We could do the prep work on your or my talk page? Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yours. Let me know when you've got something. Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- This'd probably need a little bit of planning first, at least to get evidence in support of the request together. After that, it'd be an amendment request at WP:ARCA. Ultimately the decision is up to ArbCom. We could do the prep work on your or my talk page? Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't disagree. But we should still have some sort of formal allowance for "ECP and 1RR from the get-go" in the case of articles about, or mostly about, individuals whose gender identity calls for different pronouns and/or attracts deadnaming. This is so common with trans or NB individuals that I would defy you to find an article about one where this hasn't had to be done.
- I second this position. Even after the news has died down, this will remain one of those critical subjects that will continue receiving just enough attention that reverting vandalism on this article will remain a potentially infrequent, but consistent chore for editors. I find it more reasonable to consider semi-protection an act of preventative maintenance. Agentdoge (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's a relatively new article, though ... my feeling is deciding now that it needs indef semi is a little pre-emptive (although based on past GENSEX protections, particularly the very similar Murder of Brianna Ghey, it's likely headed that way). We should give the community its chance to protect the article, or at the very least not impose indef semi without some sort of consensus. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- On that note, to all those reading, the justification I believe for indefinite protection is that ultimately this being a GENSEX article makes it at all times a target for IP vandalism, but its inevitable low traffic once the news cycle moves on means that such vandalism may take a while for anyone to actually notice and correct. Thus, an easy filter against this is indefinite semi. Snokalok (talk) 18:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- I've semi-protected this article for 24 hours as a stopgap against disruptive editing while discussion continues here about longer protection. — The Anome (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. This can be justified as WP:GENSEX enforcement. Sideswipe9th (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP/New user disruption in February. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Inverted Choopies Deepfake (talk) 10:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Vandalism from you, yes. To any admin reading this, recommend indef for OP. — Czello (music) 10:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by newbie + IP. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 11:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: MOS:FILMPLOT disruption has returned. Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- And now we have recently-registered editors removing plot because of spoilers. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP editor repeatedly inserting unrelated video games section. Requesting a short period of semi-protection. Barry Wom (talk) 14:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 range blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page hijacking for self-promotional posts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. User and /64 range blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, pending changes doesn't seem to be working. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. 9yearold009 (talk) 16:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fuerdai socks. Prodraxis (talk) 18:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP and non ECP users repeatedly creating new sections that are WP:SOAPBOXING or otherwise disruptive. IPs posting to RfC. Article is ECP protected and WP:GSRUSUKR applies Cinderella157 (talk) 07:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Indef semi lifted 2021, but disruption of considerable intensity have since resumed. El_C 21:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is back after protections expired yesterday. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick this month in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Also leaving a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by registered users and IP's. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of pro PKK vandalism, using 0 sources TRAVERA1 (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 21:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- As WP:KURDS. Long term problem, so I'm erring on the side of severity, Daniel Case. El_C 21:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After multiple reverts for content added without sources but still edits are been made for IP addresses. Aadirulez8 (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Constant addition of unsourced information by IPs. BePlus (talk) 18:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism for past 36 hours, probably due to subject appearing on fringe talk show yesterday. Fred Zepelin (talk) 20:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism from multiple IPs. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 20:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 21:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Some users changing the results to Ottoman victory when it's Georgian victory. 109.242.74.38 (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please invoke WP:ARBEE if it isn’t already. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I might be wrong, but I'm not sure ARBEE applies here. El_C 21:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. Maybe we need a separate CTOPS designation, probably an expansion of A-A, for the Caucasus. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I've asked for one that covers Turkey as well as other contentious areas of Western Asia not covered by existing sanction regimes on more than one occasion, but successive committees were, like, no, get fucked (granted, more politely, but that was the gist). El_C 21:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe it could be community sanctions? They might not be comfortable imposing that one on their own. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I tried that, as well, but there just wasn't enough interest. Happy to give it another go, though. El_C 21:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- When enough admins get sick enough of these reports here and at ANEW ... Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I tried that, as well, but there just wasn't enough interest. Happy to give it another go, though. El_C 21:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe it could be community sanctions? They might not be comfortable imposing that one on their own. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I've asked for one that covers Turkey as well as other contentious areas of Western Asia not covered by existing sanction regimes on more than one occasion, but successive committees were, like, no, get fucked (granted, more politely, but that was the gist). El_C 21:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. Maybe we need a separate CTOPS designation, probably an expansion of A-A, for the Caucasus. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib (talk) 21:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruption coming from IP users. MaterialsPsych (talk) 22:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
23 February 2024
Indefinite pending changes protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Ip hopper from serbia constantly removing content in spite of consensus, repeat from jun of 2017. Also ARBAA2 to boot. Geardona (talk to me?) 20:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Thecowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 22:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 00:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring. HorrorLover555 (talk) 23:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP keeps adding unsourced content to this BLP. Don't have an appetite to fight with them. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:ARBPAK. El_C 00:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – free agency rumors. Will120 (talk) 00:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A likely contentious subject, as well as subject to daily edits and changes in edit history, which isn't a bad thing per se, but could potentially end up in an edit war or with vandalism at some future point. I believe this is overall contentious and should be protected for the best level of neutrality and structural integrity possible. It should be protected like all other Israel or Israel related articles as well as any Palestinian related articles, etc. 70.23.5.67 (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. December is too
Stale. If something new happens, feel free to relist. I did revdel some of the more egregious disruption. El_C 21:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. 172.0.184.17 (talk) 19:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 21:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
*
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ??? OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie: As far as I can see, all of the edits by non-confirmed users to this redirect in the last few years have been reverted, and there are quite a number of them - the vast majority of history entries seem to be either vandalism or edits reverting said vandalism. I came across this request while randomly browsing RFPP, but if I'd reverted vandalism on that page myself & then checked the history, I'd probably have requested semiprotection myself (albeit possibly for a few years rather than indefinitely, given the page hasn't been protected before). All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 00:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. A, I see now; I missed that it was a redirect, I was looking at the history of the target. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Censorship from Navy officer. Binksternet (talk) 18:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 21:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. DrowssapSMM 21:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing that much has been removed from the page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Geraldo Perez keeps editing Oscar Isaac's portrait when I think's it's perfectly fine. SpectrumGamer05 (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- SpectrumGamer05 (talk · contribs) keeps changing a very good quality recent image to a lower quality older image and refuses to discuss the change on the article talk page. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done Please don't post here again until you read and understand our WP:PROTECTION policy. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Insertion of commentary, OR, unreliable sources and other unsubstantiated edits by possible block evading sock Borgenland (talk) 01:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:ARBPAK. El_C 02:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increase in unsourced edits & vandalism. Josh (talk) 03:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IPs, at least one of which has been blocked for sock puppetry. DonIago (talk) 03:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There are repeated good faith edits with not reliable sources by IP user and his sock puppet account created newly (IP:161.69.71.25 and User:Sooriyamalai, whose only contributions have been these edits). Despite repeated reverts with reasons by various users, this has been continuing. The page is in the middle of a GA review and improvements as well. So request temporary protection to extended users. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 03:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of recent disruptive editing from non-confirmed users on this talk page, including two oversighted edits in less than a year and a half. —a smart kitten[meow] 04:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Lot's of disruptive editing has occurred a number of edits were reverted due to being link spam 1keyhole (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Windows Server 2025 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by an IP user. Needs to be protected until user gets blocked (which should be within a day or two). Mseingth2133444 (Did I mess up? Let me know here) 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Talk page should also be protected. Mseingth2133444 (Did I mess up? Let me know here) 02:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2806:2F0:33E0:F457:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Airline's announcement today of its pending closure has resulted in extensive edit-warring, including by several anonymous editors; there were as many edits today as the previous two months combined Stephen Hui (talk) 06:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption from IP users (possibly the same person hopping around different ranges). MaterialsPsych (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 08:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 174.66.157.92 (talk · contribs). @YesI'mOnFire: Please read WP:3RRNO. Specifically, if you're claiming an exemption to 3RR, it needs to be stated clearly in the edit summary or in a new section on the talk page. Also, if the disruption resumes, please request page protection again. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of baseless nationalistic editing. Similar things were done in the past for same page. Edits didn't made into the main article. Merhabainternet (talk) 13:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Category:Pakistani politicians convicted of corruption (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shellwood (talk) 12:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ARBIPA enforcement requested if possible. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Yup, more WP:ARBPAK yet still. El_C 15:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced content to BLP and vandalism. Panian513 13:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protected by Ohnoitsjamie. I think leaving both in place is fine, though. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: ECP is no longer necessary, and arguably never was necessary. I haven't seen any example in the history of vandalism while semi-protection was active. Isn't ECP supposed to only be an escalation if semi fails? 2600:1000:B15A:76D0:D5E2:6609:BFBC:300 (talk) 22:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined User is checkuserblocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Ongoing war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, further protection needed by ArbCom to prevent insensitive information being added EggPudding77777 (talk) 11:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article has not been edited once in the last 7 days. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Constant disruptive edits made by inexperienced IP users. SuperWikiBrother (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of inappropriate infobox images by IPs. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent non-constructive/disruptive edits from 106.205.136.0/21. Maybe p-block that range from this article for a long period instead of just a short semi-protection against all IPs?. — Archer1234 (t·c) 12:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- 106.205.136.0/21 has just been blocked for 2 weeks, but there are other IPs (IPv4 and IPv6) that have previously made the same sorts of disruptive edits on this page. Might be worth leaving the page unprotected as a honeypot to see to which ranges they hop next. — Archer1234 (t·c) 13:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 106.205.136.0/21 (talk · contribs) blocked by K6ka. Just doing the block seems appropriate at this point. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting move protection for article in a naming dispute. The article had previously been unilaterally moved without consensus. I feel this needs administrator input. Tammbecktalk 13:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:St.nerol, in the face of my reasoned changes and without providing any explanation, continues to prevent improved changes to the text Philodemous (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done You are edit warring against multiple other editors. I suggest you discuss changes on the talk page before you get blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Capitals00 (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The Night Watch (talk) 14:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Currently a Google Doodle featured article with high level of IP activity, including the violation of MOS:ETHNICITY, Wikipedia:Edit warring and nonconstructive Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Merangs (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Old name of the bridge is being brought up by some right wing party in the middle of electoral campaign for upcoming elections.
Portuguese version of the page has been protected as well. Tiagomagalhaes (talk) 17:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 17:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Page was protected until 5th Feb. IP editor has now added the same unsourced information as was repeatedly added before. Tacyarg (talk) 17:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked /64 range for 1 month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Please semi-protect for one day. High level of IP vandalism, since it is currently on the main page. Jens Lallensack (talk) 18:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and religious POV pushing. This article is contentious because Ravidassias were considered part of the Sikh faith, but have splintered off in recent times, there is also a dispute regarding the extent of the religious status of the founder, hence there are many disruptive editors pushing their religious biases here. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/IPA. Favonian (talk) 18:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
24 February 2024
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 22:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated edits by an IP user regarding "serious grammatical error" of the usage of the word "Onward", despite the issue has been resolved via consensus at the talk page Jauhsekali (talk) 23:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 98.11.54.102 (talk) 18:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC) The Thin Blue Line Flag has nothing to do with Trump supporters and their rallies, although they may have appeared there in the past, it has no direct relation to conservative thinking or being a Trump supporter. This flag is a symbol of great respect toward law enforcement, as well as those who have given their life to serve our communities.
- I assume you're referring to Thin blue line#Blue Lives Matter and have changed the request accordingly. Favonian (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Thin blue line is not protected. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP fancruft. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2.50.67.228 (talk · contribs). This time for a year. In case more IPs show up with the same kind of drivel, protection will be forthcoming. Favonian (talk) 20:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mellk (talk) 22:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed, the article was protected for a year, and the protection expired in November. Disruption resumed and is ongoing. Ymblanter (talk) 22:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:ARBEE. El_C 23:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 23:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @El C Thankyou! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 23:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Of course.
El_C 00:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Of course.
- @El C Thankyou! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 23:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – frequent un-cited changes by IP range who refuses to discuss on talk page. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Question: but Frank Ryan (Irish republican)#Collaboration with Nazi Germany 1940–1944, so what is the issue? Haven't had my coffee yet, so please go ez if it's simple. El_C 16:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Chris troutman and Serial Number 54129: courtesy pings. El_C 23:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is listing Nazi Germany in the "allegiance" section of the infobox, for which there is no consensus. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is listing Nazi Germany in the "allegiance" section of the infobox, for which there is no consensus. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: IP's keep changing sourced detail's of article subject's death. RF23 (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 22:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The part for Android 15 does not have a hyperlink and needs to be fixed. 2A00:23C8:B097:2F01:DC5A:CEC3:48A4:8A4D (talk) 22:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Android version history is not protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Page protection recently expired; vandalism by the IPs again. Some1 (talk) 02:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support: I was about to make a request as well, and I'm considering making a 3RR report. Indefinite WP:SEMI or WP:ECP would be very welcome. I'm prepping an SPI, but due to WP:OUTING concerns, I'm awaiting advice from @Aoidh. In addition to that, there's a COI and lots of WP:GAMING and purposefully causing link rot in an effort to undermine consensus. The person in question travels around the globe a lot, hence the slew of random IPs involved. So in lieu of indefinite extended protection, a long enough semi-protection would be very helpful. That way, the SPI (and the subsequent COI/Vandalism resolution) can get a chance to mitigate further issues once protection is lifted.
- ConcurrentState (talk) 03:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- If the vandalism is mostly or entirely from IP addresses then ECP is not justified. If there are disagreements about the content in the article, the first stop should be the article talk page. If editors are unable to come to consensus, then please seek dispute resolution help. Do not edit war. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Seems like I just posted my comment as you were taking action. Please disregard it, couldn't ask for more. Thanks! ConcurrentState (talk) 04:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- If the vandalism is mostly or entirely from IP addresses then ECP is not justified. If there are disagreements about the content in the article, the first stop should be the article talk page. If editors are unable to come to consensus, then please seek dispute resolution help. Do not edit war. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It seems like there is a lot of WP:NOTDIARY cruft, but that doesn't warrant removing references and other bad disruptive behavior. However, I don't see significant disruption from autoconfirmed editors so ECP isn't warranted. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2402:d000:8100:a97a::/64 (talk · contribs). Partially blocked from editing the article for 1 year, logging as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- I must've misclicked ECP when I meant Semi, but thank you for blocking the IP. Some1 (talk) 04:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruption, unsourced edits by multiple accounts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:ECCE:7D2C:D24B:CA6F (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 05:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- See also page edits by Theodosius III. --Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 05:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Theodosius III (talk · contribs) blocked by Callanecc. Chetsford (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 09:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent Sockpuppetry – Temporary increase in page protection due to presumed WMF blocked user's sockpuppet gaming autoconfirmed to edit a semi-protected page. 24.46.161.78 (talk) 06:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been getting a lot of negative attention mostly from IPs lately as a hot topic. I think the page would benefit from 1-2 weeks of protection. popodameron talk 06:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm sure this will blow over quickly. Chetsford (talk) 08:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP activity and disruption due to the current ongoing event, and will need time to rectify the tables. 456legendtalk 07:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary increase in page protection due to presumed WMF blocked user's sockpuppet gaming autoconfirmed to edit a semi-protected page. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 08:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time.On further review, a short period of EC is warranted. Chetsford (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC); edited 08:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There has been unfair and unsourced edits by a group of wikipedia editors.
They have been removing legitimate awards of the subject (Josh Cahill) of the page. In the link below, they are discussing/planning to add unsourced changes to Josh Cahill's wikipedia page. They also claimed that the source used on Josh Cahill's wikipedia page is WP:Sponsored but there is no proof, and they did not provide any other sources on why the source is WP:Sponsored. Their claims could also qualify as WP:OR.
https://www.vielfliegertreff.de/forum/threads/josh-cahill-vs-qr.158264/page-14
On the forum, they are clearly not neutral (NPOV)
"Mit dem Wikipedia-Autor Jpatokal stehe ich im Kontakt. Und Jpatokal hat schon viel "Handfestes" über unseren guten Aljoscha gesammelt." - doc7austin2
It seems to be vandalised by these two users: User:Jpatokal and doc7austin2 ( PatrickChiao (talk) 06:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @PatrickChiao: In addition, please don't falsely accuse people of vandalism. Read WP:VANDAL. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- ok noted PatrickChiao (talk) 06:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Some conflict related editing from ips recently. Ben Azura (talk) 06:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not currently see a need for extended confirmed protection Ymblanter (talk) 12:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – troll target; translate their edits to see what I mean. CRBoyer 07:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CSMention269 (talk) 09:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A shifting IPv6 is repeatedly removing the MFD template from this page, and has been warned repeatedly. A 64-range has been blocked, but the address is shifting in a larger range, and the IP continues to remove the template. The most straightforward action seems to be semiprotection until the MFD is concluded. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism attempts going on. Amigao (talk) 15:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us see how pending changes would work in this case.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated reversion to reinstate uncited dob (suspect the same user, different IPs). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page has been protected six times, last time for a year. The protection expired, and daily disruption (which in addition of just being disruption also violates WP:RUSUKR) resumed. It is probably time for an indefinite protection. Ymblanter (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. After additional review of the article history, I increased the protection level and duration. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/EE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandal keeps removing sourced material without explanation and without discussing on talk. C.J. Griffin (talk) 16:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @C.J. Griffin: Please warn disruptive editors on their talk page (especially when they are persistent), even if their IP keeps changing. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 10:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nobody has warned 2601:401:4300:3720:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism today, a short term protect might lighten the load a bit. Mlkj (talk) 12:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined Um, there's been zero vandalism. Bbb23 (talk) 14:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, alright. There has been a flurry of edits today, and it felt a bit overwhelming to keep up with, but maybe that will have calmed down. I had a few in a row which I rolled back as vandalism: [126], [127], [128], but I can see why it wouldn't looked too concerning drowned in today's 100+ edits to the page, fair enough! Mlkj (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: I think they meant to submit the article: Elimination Chamber: Perth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oooh my bad! Thanks for catching this, that explains it =)
- It might also haved calmed down on its own, I'm happy to accept the decline on this this botched request, thanks for taking the time either way. Mlkj (talk) 16:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As soon as the protection expired, a new account attempted to remove sourced content, pushing a certain POV. Aintabli (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS, again. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 16:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article has been subjected to POV edit-warring and occasional outright vandalism by an endless series of IPs and SPAs (possibly some socks in the mix), going back years, e.g.: [129], [130], [131], [132], [133], [134], [135], [136], [137], [138], [139], [140], [141], [142], [143]. In all this time, there have been very few constructive edits; the article history is dominated by disruptions and reverts. R Prazeres (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism plus ctops vios. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 17:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see page title... 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 18:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. One of the few cases where I won't argue with going to indef so soon. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Different IPs removing sourced content and adding unsourced in tandem [144] [145] [146] [147] [148]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- TV3 (Malaysian TV network) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- 8TV (Malaysian TV network) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- TV9 (Malaysian TV network) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 36.76.6.57 (talk) 14:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- 8TV and TV9
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. As far as TV3, I have not seen enough recent disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Daniel Case: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 21:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA target in addition to generally-disrespected and often vandalized artist. Disruption resumed quickly after protection expired. dannymusiceditor oops 14:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism after protection expired. MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 18:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Got rid of PCP; it's superfluous to this and it wasn't doing anything to stop disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the vandalism has stopped. Now this page requires some important information but as this page is protected, editors aren't able to submit the informations. Such as we need to add the plot section in this page so that people can read it and learn about how the show is and if it's watch worthy........ . Tarapriya (talk) 16:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Tarapriya: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- "Unprotect this page so I can advertize it by putting in a massive plot section" is a losing argument no matter where it's made on Wikipedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Dhruv Tara – Samay Sadi Se Pare is not protected. Favonian (talk) 17:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As soon as the protection expired, a new account attempted to remove sourced content, pushing a certain POV. 2409:40D4:1017:A1E7:789B:24FF:FE4D:E70A (talk) 14:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. You, that is. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie Haha! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 18:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement Ccole2006 (talk) 16:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hasn't been edited in two months. Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement Ccole2006 (talk) 16:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hasn't been edited in a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA editor being a nuisance. CRBoyer 17:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 182.3.36.130 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip's keep adding the name/nickname "pookie" to the article. GrayStorm(Talk|Contributions) 21:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 21:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 22:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Favonian (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 22:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Favonian (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
25 February 2024
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Sagflaps (talk) 17:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement. Ccole2006 (talk) 20:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hasn't been edited in six months. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement Ccole2006 (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits since September. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Zert (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- ZERT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Promotion by cryptocurrency users. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- User:JalenFolf, I warned those users--next time, please do that when you revert such edits, so that it's easier for us to block in a timely fashion and prevent disruption. I don't see the need to protect at this moment. Drmies (talk) 21:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Recent patterns of the infobox photo being changed to much older, lower quality photos, sometimes with vandalised subtitles. XAnio (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:GENSEX. BangJan1999 01:53, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High volume of Taylor Swift-related vandalism seemingly coming from TikTok. Tollens (talk) 22:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Article gets vandalized by IP addresses, recommend Semi-protection AskeeaeWiki (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 26 January 2024. Panian513 01:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. May also fall under WP:RUSUKR. Mellk (talk) 22:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- It already falls under WP:ARBEE for the record. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/EE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent spamming, low volume of edits. MaterialsPsych (talk) 00:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Add the WP:WCAA shortcut. 100.11.111.79 (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done, since that redirect is so rarely used compared to the shortcuts currently on the page. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Too many edit with incorrect information. Naz soon (talk) 03:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs and short-lived vandal-only accounts. Austronesier (talk) 09:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ΣΒ (talk) 11:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Film banned in some countries Digitclock23 (talk) 09:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That's not a valid reason for protecting a page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level attempt of restoring deleted article. See its history. And a brand new editor has been restored it recently. The deleted article have been attempted to restore 6 times till now. Imperial[AFCND] 11:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator JBW. Admin only. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Waseem MumtazFhar28 (talk) 04:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- No such article exists – you can create an article by submitting a draft to Articles for Creation. You may wish to read Help:Your first article. Tollens (talk) 04:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Meaningless request. Favonian (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request that this page is enabled for everyone to edit as it may help you to correct any errors. 202.8.116.96 (talk) 09:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not only is the princess in another castle, you'd need a MUCH better argument than "because I want it to be unprotected" as the indef is an escalation from a 3 year protection period. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 09:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Thank you for being a showcase for the necessity of continued protection. Favonian (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously static IP adding BLP violating content is no longer static. Onorem (talk) 15:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Favonian (talk) 17:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – EDIT WAR!!!!!1! lol. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 16:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2001:fb1:14::/46 (talk · contribs). This time for a year. Favonian (talk) 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Steady stream of vandalism from a variety of IPs and new accounts. signed, Willondon (talk) 18:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Night Watch (talk) 19:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
26 February 2024
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:53, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 20:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit warring by an unregistered editor using multiple IP addresses ElKevbo (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Alternatively, you could block their new IP address as they are clearly evading their current block initially placed on 129.174.255.57. ElKevbo (talk) 22:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 65.196.101.3 (talk · contribs). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: ECP expired again; per GS/RUSUKR 75.84.34.130 (talk) 00:12, 26 February 2024
- Already Extended Confirmed Protected indefinitely by ToBeFree — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8080:600:1487:515b:823f:15e3:df90 (talk) 00:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Please change the page protection rights from open to semi-protected. IP editors are coming and unanimously editing the mission outcomes of SLIM and IM-1 mission without discussions on this page as you see in history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_missions_to_Mars&action=history . They don't discuss and want to know that Whether a lander ended up on its side, nose, or facing an unexpected direction are not inherently criteria of mission success. The criteria are whether each payload was enabled to perform its designed function or does the lander full-fill the mission requirements for that agency for that mission. SLIM lander main objective is landing so successful. Though im-1 has landed tilted here, only Moon Phases Art installation is blocked that is passive and rest payloads are working. Communication bleak signals say, its a case of priority to get max Scientific results, so delay. Thus like for some virgin Galactic flights are suborbital at 85+km, landing success (if agency needs that only) or payload working give a mission success designation. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 15:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @RIP B1058: This page is for requesting edits to pages that are already protected. You need to make your case at the Increase subpage. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oh sorry i was confused by word8ng is this the right Wikipedia forum to ask thanks for telling the right one. Please archive this discussion. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 18:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The history of this page is almost entirely reverted diffs, from random new accounts or IPs. There are very few non-spam edits that I can see from new users. It's had temporary semi-protection in the past. I'm requesting semi again as a small step above pending changes. Though looking at the crossed out lines in the history, I wonder if it'll need more :|. Mlkj (talk) 12:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is still pending-changes protected indefinitely too. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent genre warring from a hopping IP editor, who adds unsourced or blog-sourced genres. Tkbrett (✉) 12:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 41.246.128.0/22 (talk · contribs). Partial block for a month. Favonian (talk) 17:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Favonian: The IP has an account (HighPriestOfSaturn) and is back at genre warring. Tkbrett (✉) 21:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If more vandalism occurs please notify me if protection is needed. The Night Watch (talk) 23:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of reversion, and edit warring/potential vandalism being conducted by 96.230.157.3 Bbjeter (talk) 22:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. We're not protecting an article for something that happened two weeks ago. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Moxy- 14:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I warned the user about edit warring and I also informed them about MOS:INFOBOX. @Nikkimaria: @Moxy: Please read WP:BITE regarding edit summaries and talk page explanations. Edit summaries like
See mos
andodd placing
are much too terse to be sufficient when you are engaged in a dispute with a newer editor. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection, Reason: Suspected blocked member who is suspected of sockpuppetry now seems to be using an IP to reinstate his views, after both of their accounts got banned. VirtualVagabond (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated acts of vandalism have led to consensus on the talk page that this page needs protection. Jenhawk777 (talk) 23:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 01:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Edit: I see that a parallel request was made above. I declined this independently before I saw it. While I see that there has been a bit of frustration among the regular editors there, and it looks like you are making a push toward FA status, I still don't see sufficient disruption to warrant barring anonymous editing at this time. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 01:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- List of Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance candidates for the 2024 Indian general election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: High level of vandalism by Newly Created Accounts.As this is a election season try to increase protection of this pageDev Adhi (talk) 10:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ARBIPA requested if possible. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense诉 21:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. There isn't enough disruption to justify page protection at this time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- The user can't be warned as they are already temporarily blocked for vandalism on other pages. Please reconsider. Jenhawk777 (talk) 23:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- I understand it's frustrating to have people vandalizing an article while you're working on improving it, but it wasn't a close decision. Regarding the disruptive users, there were several more recent disruptive edits and that user has been warned so WP:AIV would be the next step for them, and the user from a day ago is temporarily blocked and not sockpuppeting on this article so they aren't a standalone reason to protect it either. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- The user can't be warned as they are already temporarily blocked for vandalism on other pages. Please reconsider. Jenhawk777 (talk) 23:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pepoele cant respect teh spleelling on thepage/. (is there enough to justify protection). 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 23:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan Fair. Will know for future, I don't want to clog up RPP 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 01:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- @JayCubby: There is definitely an issue with ongoing if not especially frequent disruption, but with only one disruptive edit in the last 5 days, the level of disruption isn't sufficient right now. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan Fair. Will know for future, I don't want to clog up RPP 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 01:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection is required, due to continuing vandalism of 'owners' section in infobox, by IP/Mobile editor or editors. GoodDay (talk) 04:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content upon expiry of last protection template on 23 February. Edit history shows that this likely falls under a contentious topics issue (religious relations in India), as most of the disruptive editing involves unsourced assertions that the mosque was originally a Hindu temple. Panian513 16:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will add CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of tampering of important historical facts by nuisance creators. Divyanshindia1407 (talk) 16:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Divyanshindia1407: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Semi-protected indefinitely. Also logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing, likely a sensitive topic given that the US elections are right around the corner. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 03:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Immediate resume of previous behaviour stemming from previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has seen sourced content being removed again. Page was previously protected, requesting indefinite protection. Noorullah (talk) 04:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This article is WP:CTOPS, just came off a quick full protection for edit warring and was automatically unprotected. I'm too WP:INVOLVED. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Restored earlier protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Muboshgu well check it you self your administrator you protected Philadelphia Flyers so how come you can't protect this page Fani Willis if your administrator then you don't need to request protection for this page you could do it yourself if who ever is not or non administrator then they could request the protection. 24.46.161.253 (talk) 05:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Muboshgu My question is how come you can't protect this page because your administrator why? 24.46.161.253 (talk) 05:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- As the link to WP:INVOLVED would tell you if you were enterprising enough to click it, an admin directly involved in a content dispute cannot be the one to protect the page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Hi,I recently found some unknown user try to attempt an fake genealogy of baj singh bal without any proper sourcing its my request to protect this article in order to prevent fake information Truthfindervert (talk) 15:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: User talk page of one of User:Shame on PJ Santos' IP socks. The IP got blocked for 6 months last February 10 for harassment and vandalism and now it uses the user talk page for vandalism and tagging everyone involved in its block. The user talk page was previously semi-protected for 1 week. - WayKurat (talk) 03:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I revoked talk page access. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Should be under ARBPIA and IPs are editing it to change how the Israel-Hamas war is being described. Patient Zerotalk 06:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Chetsford (talk) 06:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New users and ips adding copyrighted pictures and using YouTube or blogs as sources for facts. Shadow4dark (talk) 09:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 09:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. Jordanncj (talk) 17:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism by obvious sockpuppets. User3749 (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits by IPs again and again. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 04:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly reverting unsourced edits from IPs who are likely LOUTSOCK. CNMall41 (talk) 05:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. — Czello (music) 08:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism (again) Go-goldorak (talk) 09:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Please change the page protection rights from open to semi-protected. There is high level of IP vandalism. IP editors are coming and unanimously editing the mission outcomes of SLIM and IM-1 mission without discussions on this page as you see in history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_missions_to_Mars&action=history . They don't discuss and want to know that Whether a lander ended up on its side, nose, or facing an unexpected direction are not inherently criteria of mission success. The criteria are whether each payload was enabled to perform its designed function or does the lander full-fill the mission requirements for that agency for that mission. SLIM lander main objective is landing so successful. Though im-1 has landed tilted here, only Moon Phases Art installation is blocked that is passive and rest payloads are working. Communication bleak signals say, its a case of priority to get max Scientific results, so delay. Thus like for some virgin Galactic flights are suborbital at 85+km, landing success (if agency needs that only) or payload working give a mission success designation. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 18:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 10:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: VPNs and IP addresses are engaging in disruptive editting by replacing sourced info with unsourced info about Zhang's coach. Users have no history of editting on Wikipedia, and don't use the talk page. Users specifically target information about his coach. sourced info about his coach will eventually be replaced by unsourced info.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zhang_Zhizhen&diff=prev&oldid=1210215380 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zhang_Zhizhen&diff=prev&oldid=1180996947 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zhang_Zhizhen&diff=prev&oldid=1180889739 LilAhok (talk) 23:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 10:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – page is being attacked after recent protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 03:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 10:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Promotional spam. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Favonian (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism Elvisisalive95 (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi ,I want to make some additional changes regarding to sikh genereal baj singh for this time Truthfindervert (talk) 07:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:List of Jats is not protected, Favonian (talk) 11:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Change Draft:Jishnu (actor) to Jishnu (actor) Jishnu Raghav (talk) 11:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Submit the draft through the WP:Articles for creation process. When and if it's deemed to be ready for publication, it'll be moved to article space. Favonian (talk) 12:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism. Amigao (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: High risk article. PoisonHK Sapiens dominabitur astris (talk • contribs) 16:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary Semi-Protection: Disruptive editing and unsourced mass spamming by IPs. Non-encylopedic format. Fragrant Peony (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 14:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator The Night Watch. Favonian (talk) 16:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Large number of (understandably) furious IP edits, seems likely to continue, better they're guided to the talk page. Pinkbeast (talk) 14:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:AP2. El_C 16:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 16:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. BangJan1999 14:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Extensive IP vandalism. Examples: [149], [150], [151], [152]; (talk page had a copy of the entire Wikipedia page for Among Us) TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 15:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, and this too. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 15:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks (talk page, one week), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinte extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBCOM CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 16:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary Semi Protection: Persistent addition, ignorance of WP:OVERCITE and non-constructive edit by new editor, also unwilling to engage discussion on talk page. By putting temp semi protection, new editor will be required to engage in constructive discussion on the gain consensus and edit the article. Ckfasdf (talk) 12:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 16:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Falls under WP:GS/RUSUKR, should have an indef ECP. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 13:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 16:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing and unsourced spamming by IPs.. BrownCanary61 (talk) 16:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. El_C 16:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. See talk page. A number of edits are being made to include a 'Criminal Charges' sections. Possibly as a politically motivated thing to do. No other UK party has a 'criminal charges section'. See page talk section and various edits. NottsPolitics (talk) 15:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This way neither you nor the IP will be able to edit it and will have to work it out on the talk page. The absence of any such section from our articles on other British political parties is not a valid reason by itself to remove it, not when it's adequately sourced. Nor does this argument scale well as there's a huge difference between the larger parties, which claim hundreds or even thousands of current and former elected officials at all levels of government, and a very small one that has fielded candidates in one very small area of England. Although, I am not sure it deserves a separate section, at least not when we have (as noted on the talk page) separate articles about some of these people, including the party leader. Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Lot of IP vandalism, and repetitive editing even upon reverting them quoting firm sources Cric editor (talk) 10:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring by LTA. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 07:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:GENSEX. BangJan1999 16:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 17:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism. Attention on article because he just died. 50.231.37.122 (talk) 18:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the usual runtime of BRDP. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
27 February 2024
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent ongoing target. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit-warring by IPs. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial blocked a range. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked a /64 range for a spell. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Increase protection. Frequent addition of poorly sourced, POV statements. Seems like users are trying hard to pass semiprotection to add their POV. As the article's result section is controversial, and edit warrings are expected at any moment, requesting for increasing the protection. Imperial[AFCND] 05:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Can you identify any disruptive editors who haven't been blocked indefinitely who would be unable to edit if the existing semi was raised to ECP? Daniel Case (talk) 05:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well User:R2dra have been warned for disruptive editing for almost 12+ times. I took that to WP:AIV, but a bot removed that report; I didn't catch it further. I am pretty sure that user will continue doing the same on Indian history related articles. Just check their talk page and it will be all clear. Imperial[AFCND] 07:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Rd2ra (talk · contribs) blocked by Star Mississippi. for 31 hours. It does seem like they're heading for an IPA topic ban or some CTOPS action like that if they continue in this vein. Yes, ECP would keep them from editing the article, but at the cost of closing it off to some autoconfirmed editors who might be willing to contribute productively.
- There are two things we could do about this:
- Pending changes. At least until such time as Rd2ra gets EC user rights without gaming the system to get it. Or
- 1RR. Would apply equally to everyone editing and slow down any edit wars.
- How do you feel about either of those. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well User:R2dra have been warned for disruptive editing for almost 12+ times. I took that to WP:AIV, but a bot removed that report; I didn't catch it further. I am pretty sure that user will continue doing the same on Indian history related articles. Just check their talk page and it will be all clear. Imperial[AFCND] 07:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from cross-wiki ja:LTA:GNSN. Supergrey1 (talk) 14:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. All three socks have been indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from vandal-only account. Hotwiki (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Andybonifacio (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing on the article; multiple users have consistently added information irrelevant to the TV show. Previously resulted in a recent three-month protection. It is evident that they are resistant to learn from past actions. Without indefinite protection of this page, the ongoing issues will continue, detrimentally impacting the quality and integrity of the article. Therefore, it is crucial that indefinite protection must be implemented to safeguard against further disruption. BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined We do not full-protect articles indefinitely. Ever. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial-blocked a few IPs. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
BrickMaster02 you can request Extended Confirmed Protection Indefinitely if you want to but we don't do Full Protection Indefinitely. 24.46.162.27 (talk) 22:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Or you could request Temporary Full Protection or Temporary Extended Confirmed Protection either way. 24.46.162.27 (talk) 22:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after protections expired yesterday. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are persistently claiming argan oil is only located in Morocco. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 23:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- And also users. Generally a nationalist quest to claim a tree (in Acroterion's words...) 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 00:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Done Still at it, so let's make it indefinite. Acroterion (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks and cheers! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 01:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unreferenced content from block evading IP. Panian513 22:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator 0xDeadbeef. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. persistent vandalism from multiple ip vandals Staraction (talk | contribs) 22:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Izno. Semi-protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. persistent vandalism from new users & IPs Staraction (talk | contribs) 00:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism from multiple new user accounts Staraction (talk | contribs) 01:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse from Costa Rica. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/152.231.191.238 and User:Crisrod 9124. Binksternet (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: No need for IP editors to edit a long established template. Moxy- 05:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian (talk) 13:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from multiple new IPs. BrownCanary61 (talk) 11:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. R2dra (talk) 12:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: there is a new name for a chicken and i wanted to add it in for people 109.159.194.122 (talk) 11:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Your brilliant contributions confirm the need for continued protection. Favonian (talk) 12:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection - as it appears to be a ban evading editor, showing up on page. GoodDay (talk) 17:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Reinstating due to being archived without action. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator The Wordsmith. Favonian (talk) 20:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection - appears to be a ban evading situation. GoodDay (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Reinstating due to being archived without action. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator The Wordsmith. Favonian (talk) 20:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High counts of IP vandalism 45BearsFan (talk) 21:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism and opinions coming from likely readers of the series, though there are some constructive edits coming from non-autoconfirmed users. Rusty4321 talk contribs 01:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IPs from Ontario, Canada. Binksternet (talk) 04:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Globally locked LTA keeps editing this page. Isla🏳️⚧ 16:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
semi-protection, from possible ban evading editor. GoodDay (talk) 17:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Reinstating due to being archived without action. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also left a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jakarta Goat vandal. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every few days people try to add informaiton regarding the characters exit from the show which is based off of rumors. Even if these were true it would happen in series 15 which is atleast a year away. WP:CRYSTAL. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Because I noticed some grammar mistakes and I want to edit them Adam.Kitty (talk) 17:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
28 February 2024
Reason: Persistent subtle data vandalism by IP address users. —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 06:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Only edits from new users are trolling/soapboxing. Dronebogus (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A number of revdelled revisions over at least the past year, and some oversighted revisions. Not many constructive edits by non-confirmed editors. —a smart kitten[meow] 22:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log as CTOPS action. Daniel Case (talk) 22:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Edit-warring and IP editing in WP:ECR topic (Israel & Palestine). 33ABGirl (talk) 04:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Hi, there is contstant ip vandalism and edit war, ethnic slur. Could you protect the article? Thanks! OrionNimrod (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! Do you have a similar for Central Europe as Hungary locates geographically there? I think the Eastern European concept was used in the cold war due to the iron curtain. OrionNimrod (talk) 22:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am not putting this under CTOPS yet, since this is the first time we've had to protect this article in years. But it would properly be under ARBEE, as a) as the article states (and indeed the recent edit warring has been about), not all ethnic Hungarians live in present-day Hungary; quite a few live in other nearby countries such as Romania, which no one considers part of anything but Eastern Europe, and b) ARBEE calls for the topic area to be broadly construed.
- I'd also add a c): Hungary and the Soviet Union had a short border, which is today the border between Hungary and Ukraine, making "Eastern Europe" more arguable as a categorization. Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the protection! OrionNimrod (talk) 23:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! Do you have a similar for Central Europe as Hungary locates geographically there? I think the Eastern European concept was used in the cold war due to the iron curtain. OrionNimrod (talk) 22:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Protection occurred nearly 11 years ago and I highly doubt this article is a serious target for vandalism. (Assuming this page wasn't protected due to sockpuppetry) SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 20:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Unprotected Good suggestion. Please nominate for protection if issues reoccur. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP editor blanking content and formatting using multiple IP addresses with no explanation, reverting constructive edits, edit warring. Ss112 21:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Already blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic Ccole2006 (talk) 22:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- This page has been protected indefinitely since 2019. Please don't use this board unless you understand how protection works. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple instances of BLPCRIME additions to the article by account that has no other editing activity in Wikipedia. Gortaleen (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Which I just did (ANEW might be more appropriate, though). But I can't fault them for edit warring when they weren't warned about anything for the last three weeks. Nor do I see a reason under BLP to exclude this if/when it is reported in a reliable source. ... in fact, a journalist getting charged with witness intimidation isn't something that happens every day. You are best advised to take this to BLPN.. Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 21:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:CT/EE enforcement requested if possible. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article does not come under EE. Maybe someday we will have some sort of CTOPS or GS designation for the Caucasus and Asia Minor. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring been ongoing since 8 Dec, by IPs and Synox.turkic and a "new user" JR H44. Kansas Bear (talk) 23:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism and reverts. Azphalt (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:CT/EE enforcement if possible. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since this is the first protection in the article's history, I am not making it a CTOPS action. I will leave a notice on the talk page, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping racist vandal. All the "edit summary removed" in the article history are this same troll. Squeakachu (talk) 00:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 01:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBCOM CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 03:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 10:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 04:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 04:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 04:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, it may continue due to a popular celebrity. Harshvardhan 1427 (talk) 11:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. However, some users whom you have been regularly reverting, particularly Adityagoyal6363, will not be affected as they have extended confirmed permission. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 12:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent cut and paste moves from different IPs over many years. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 14:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection:: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandalism returned since the previous protection expired earlier Today. See Revision history. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ECP isn't necessary to filter out IP vandals/disruptors. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Different IPs keep adding "iOS 17.4 breaks Progressive web apps in the European Union" into a release notes section when issues like this are in a different article, even after this has been reverted 2+ times. Mseingth2133444 (Did I mess up? Let me know here) 17:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Daniel Case (talk) 06:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated unsourced changes over the last day by a user hopping between IPs ([153] [154] [155]). Requesting semi-protection. Cyberlink420 (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Bat is seeing recurring anonymous IP vandalism. Needs temporary protection. Leitmotiv (talk) 19:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. For a month. Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. // Timothy :: talk 23:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS under GENSEX. Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement Ccole2006 (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continues after recent protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruption from IP editors. MrOllie (talk) 03:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I see some clearly disruptive edits, but a number of the IP edits seem to be related to an ongoing content dispute. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism for the past few days. Daughter articles and 2024 Atlantic hurricane season have also experienced vandalism. ✶Quxyz✶ 23:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see a few edits over the past few weeks, mostly handled by the editors. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seeking indefinite semi-protection for this article that lets only autoconfirmed users edit. Louis' siblings pages have been protected as such and show no signs of IP vandalism. Article had no vandalisers for past two months when protected temporarily. Its an important article, please grant such protection at the earliest. MSincccc (talk) 08:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @MSincccc: Even if an edit is worthy of reversion, please don't bite the newcomers as you did here by labeling a good faith edit as "disruptive". Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- The IP editor had actually added fact that the person was Louis' future sister-in-law twice. Even if that user is new and inexperienced, addition of such information is disruptive @Daniel Quinlan. Regards and yours faithfully, MSincccc (talk) 09:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @MSincccc: That was a different IP editor, separated by two oceans and ten days. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan Two edits were made yesterday by an IP user at 05:46 (UTC) and 19:26 (UTC) respectively and though both IPs are different, both the edits claimed a certain Pia Hargraves to be Prince George's official future girlfriend. Also "2601:182:1080:7DE6:" is common to both IPs. Its the same person. Just wanted to tell you that I am a very peaceful person and that if possible please make sure that the page is not unprotected. Its GA potential and the article's standard will significantly improve if it were not unprotected for an indefinite period. Regards MSincccc (talk) 09:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @MSincccc: I already protected the article for 3 months. The feedback about not biting newcomers is regarding an earlier edit summary which is why I linked to it. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan Two edits were made yesterday by an IP user at 05:46 (UTC) and 19:26 (UTC) respectively and though both IPs are different, both the edits claimed a certain Pia Hargraves to be Prince George's official future girlfriend. Also "2601:182:1080:7DE6:" is common to both IPs. Its the same person. Just wanted to tell you that I am a very peaceful person and that if possible please make sure that the page is not unprotected. Its GA potential and the article's standard will significantly improve if it were not unprotected for an indefinite period. Regards MSincccc (talk) 09:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @MSincccc: That was a different IP editor, separated by two oceans and ten days. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- The IP editor had actually added fact that the person was Louis' future sister-in-law twice. Even if that user is new and inexperienced, addition of such information is disruptive @Daniel Quinlan. Regards and yours faithfully, MSincccc (talk) 09:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There is a lot of inaccurate information and history and inaccurate language Kalemoon (talk) 03:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Zionism is not protected. Favonian (talk) 06:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High Vandalism from rival fanbase for this football club article. Requesting full protection. SabyaC (talk) 11:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ohnoitsjamie: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. I've done so now. Courcelles (talk) 14:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 14:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be getting some vandalism most days in the last week- quite possibly 1 or 2 people with changing IPs. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This article has been the subject of a long duration attempt by someone who is dancing across IPs and new accounts to change the nature of the relationship of the victim and perpetrator without providing sources. In October, the article was protected against this for two weeks. See protection request. Following the expiry of that protection, the behavior resumed. A subsequent request for the same behavior resulted in the article being protected for two months. Since that protection expired, the behavior has resumed. Asking for semi protection for at least six months. I'm an administrator, but I would be considered involved. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 12:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. and logged under NEWBLPBAN. Courcelles (talk) 14:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 13:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Another Believer There have been some edits before the protection that look questionable (at best). Can you take a look at those? Courcelles (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Courcelles Apologies, I didn't realize my restoration would remove the protection. My bad! Do you mind re-protecting? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- It didn't remove the protection, just the little padlock. I'll tag it again. Courcelles (talk) 16:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Courcelles Apologies, I didn't realize my restoration would remove the protection. My bad! Do you mind re-protecting? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Another Believer There have been some edits before the protection that look questionable (at best). Can you take a look at those? Courcelles (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 16:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level attempt of pushing POV and suspecting meatpuppetry for the result section in the infobox. Imperial[AFCND] 13:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. and logged. Courcelles (talk) 16:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The article is being subject to persistent IP vandalism, possibly by different IPs. StephenMacky1 (talk) 16:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 16:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
redirect R🜨 to Earth radius Arlo James Barnes 18:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Done – Favonian (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... For the bot. Favonian (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing, mostly relating to an ongoing investigation about him (which is expected to have an outcome today [156]). Joseph2302 (talk) 11:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP user has changed titles of several films multiple times now. SonOfThornhill (talk) 14:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial-rangeblocked two ranges from Italy. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High level of disruptive page reverts by anonymous users to circumvent redirect of non-notable song to album. Johnnie Bob (talk) 17:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Draft can always go through AFC, but this is disruptive behaviour. Courcelles (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – last IP blocking ended several days ago, shortly after block expired the Trolls started coming back. Probably needs to be blocked for a longer period. Denniss (talk) 18:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits by IPs again and again. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 18:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 18:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content resumed after previous protection expired. Amaury • 10:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 12:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/TVFT. Amaury • 12:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by IPs geolocating to the northern UK. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: the current information is out of date and misleading. Discog for example finishes in 2022 and yet Fraser T Smith has released many more tracks and albums LUHARARYA (talk) 16:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- This level of protection should be removed completely and reviewed again if any vandalism or inaccurate editing. The first level was put in place in 2019 and while reviewed again, seems unnecessary LUHARARYA (talk) 16:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Kizhakku Vaasal (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of programs broadcast by Kalaignar TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Ponni C/O Rani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Obvious IP socks of OJIV continuing to edit the articles. Ravensfire (talk) 13:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All three articles, since it's been about that long since OJIV was indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Reinstated IP vandalism Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1000:b146:d833::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 21:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent adding in of particular, and talk page discussed/rejected content from varying IP addresses. JackTheSecond (talk) 22:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
29 February 2024
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 11:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was four days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR TylerBurden (talk) 12:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism. 2601:680:C985:97D0:C198:1022:FF2A:767C (talk) 16:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not much editing, save disruption, in the past year or so. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IPs spam with non-constructive editing. Fragrant Peony (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP disruption was almost two weeks ago. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism from both IPs and registered users. Salmoonlight (talk) 17:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Alpoin117 (talk · contribs) blocked by Cullen328. Indefinitely, with talk page access revoked. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Very high IP vandalism today. TheAwesomeAtom (talk) 20:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A couple of edits, all of which have been reverted. I also warned one of the IPs. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, thank you. TheAwesomeAtom (talk) 20:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor repeatedly removing sourced content replacing with unsourced content. Have searched for sources to verify the changes, but nothing found. Rotary Engine talk 20:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 02:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs inserting occupations that are either unsourced or are not main occupations of the subject. Has been going on for a while. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 02:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 02:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
FC Barcelona 143.170.121.242 (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Empty request. Favonian (talk) 21:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I wrote the copy for this page for Girls' Latin School. This material is copyrighted in my book, "Her Greatness Proclaim". Some one came in and changed it to Boston Latin Academy and then protected it. I want it changed back for copywriter infringement and protected as Girls' Latin School. I have tried editting it will not accept the changes. GLSpres (talk) 12:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- The current page has been built up by many different editors since it was created in 2006 as Boston Latin Academy. The book "Her Greatness Proclaim" was published in 2014 according to Worldcat. What parts of the article are you saying were copied from the book? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- @GLSpres: If we take your claims at face value, then we would have to delete all revisions of the page you wrote as you appear to be rejecting Wikipedia's content licences in favour of an all-rights-reserved copyright, which would make everything you added copyright violations. Are you sure you want to press this matter? If so, I can start the process of figuring out what revisions need nuked. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 22:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected because there is no protection on that page. Requester is being reverted by other editors. Disputes like this should be discussed on the article talk page, not here. If there is a case to be made at all, it would be for deletion of this article due to being a copyright violation, but the copyright detection search doesn't turn up anything significant. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection of this page is no longer necessary as there is no widely known controversy surrounding this page and there has been no spike of interest in the page Hereforthefacts1 (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined. @Hereforthefacts1: What you claim is false. There has indeed been a spile of interest over the last couple of months. Given the unusually lengthy protection log, I am not confident that disruption won't resume if protection is reduced. If you want to suggest a change, make an edit request on the article's talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Admin-only protection is no longer needed because ECP protection has been implemented. I am requesting that the protection be downgraded to ECP protection so that a draft can be accepted if ready for acceptance. There is a draft, which is not ready for acceptance. At this point I would only like to tag the redirect as {{R with possibilities}} and to permit another reviewer to review the draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced edits. JMHamo (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @JMHamo: We can protect articles for other reasons so it's not necessary to throw the term "vandalism" around when that's not what is going on. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP anon edit warring, at least 2 IP's are same person. 3RR has been exceeded, but they use 2 IPs at least. Dual Freq (talk) 23:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC).
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- I realize I am going really slowly tonight, but it doesn't hurt to start at the bottom if someone else is going top to bottom.
Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going to switch to bottom to top mode although probably just a few more for now. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- I realize I am going really slowly tonight, but it doesn't hurt to start at the bottom if someone else is going top to bottom.
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This is the third time I have come here to request protection for this page, and it keeps being removed. I do not understand. IP vandalism resumes every time protection is removed. Permanent protection, please. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection has to escalate. Johnuniq (talk) 07:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism regarding a recent news story which shows the article's subject in a poor light. IPs are removing and re-adding this content, often leaving trashed formatting in their wake. A dozen edits today fit this description, and I see lots of other recent IP vandalism as well. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 02:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please check edit history, a couple socking IPs keep creating this page as an odd copy of TV Derana. TLAtlak 03:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- To clarify, it is currently a redirect. TLAtlak 03:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Disruption here resumed immediately after the last protection on this redirect expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 05:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Every Ip edits were not constructive, but vandalism. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 07:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of a known LTA whose name I won't mention per WP:DENY. See both edit history and protection log for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection has to escalate. Johnuniq (talk) 07:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent target of an LTA troll. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent target of an LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive protection log racked up by an LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked by Spencer. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hopping IP continued of unsourced OR. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP users have been consistently section-blanking WP:RS content related to to the assets of the minister. Potential WP:COI editing from 3 different IPs. 3RR has been reached. Wiki.0hlic (talk) 06:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant EL spam. Most edits from inexperienced users have to be reverted. Mlkj (talk) 09:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: article states facts that are untrue 2600:1700:566A:B010:B0D8:BFE7:1A7F:AED3 (talk) 05:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined for painfully obvious reasons. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 05:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Article was moved without consensus and made into an historically inaccurate dab page. An RM has been started and this should be protected as a redirect until that discussion ends as the article is most likely to be moved back for historical accuracy. Skyerise (talk) 20:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continous changes made from IPs without reference, even after multiple reverts the changes are being made. Aadirulez8 (talk) 06:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Semsûrî (talk) 14:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory including East Jerusalem (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ECR, ECP is preferred for this page, especially considering that there have been several recent violations. popodameron talk 02:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Various IP and autoconfirmed editors keep removing Israel-Hamas related stuff from this portal page. Mostly from IPs though. — AP 499D25 (talk) 02:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated attempts to set death date and death place without a source. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 12:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: Page has been moved to Al-Rashid Street massacre. Although that ought to be moved back to where it initially was per NPOV. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 18:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. PoisonHK Sapiens dominabitur astris 12:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:CT/EE enforcement requested if possible. IanDBeacon (talk) 13:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at WP:RUSUKR Daniel Case (talk) 19:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: I'm in the middle of a minor edit spree on uw templates. These are always substituted, so most of them are semi protected (some, template-protected). Noticed this one isn't, submitting for your consideration. (I don't have a full list at the moment, but note that there are more in the same situation, like uw-harass1, uw-ai1). Mlkj (talk) 13:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism restarted by IPs shortly after after page protection was removed. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops, meant to say "after" once. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent POV push. Semsûrî (talk) 14:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 19:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this article on the city of Multan, Pakistan is containing many mistakes in spelling, grammar, word, content, mistakes, etc and thus protection should be completely removed and all those mistakes should be destroyed and the article should be conquered and fully edited out so that no mistakes are present, just like all other articles on Wikipedia. 120.56.103.231 (talk) 14:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Multan is not protected. Favonian (talk) 16:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurring LTA target. Last protection was in 2019 and is now currently being vandalised by IP socks of a certain long-term troll. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppetry. WP:LTA/LB2. –LDM2003 talk to me! 12:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I have little idea why, but this article seems to have an above-average rate of test edits/accidental edits/potential petty vandalism. See also filter log. Remsense诉 12:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA; see revision history. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:57, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sock puppetry. 2600:1008:B046:5F55:498D:4C21:191D:9DB6 (talk) 19:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely.
- due to persistent LTA edits from IPs over the course of several years. I will also be tagging article with {{primary sources}}, as this appears to be an underlying issue that partially caused the edit warring in this case; the content the LTA objected to may well be unjustified, but removing a source and half of the information cited to it while leaving a full paragraph of now-unreferenced information is extremely disruptive editing even before we get to the edit warring and name-calling. signed, Rosguill talk 20:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New editor ignoring guidelines regarding sourcing and listcriteria. Wants me to "stop interfering with the development of the Kazakh fandom",[157], mentioned canvasing [158], was warned not to, [159], then did it anyway.[160] (the friend is already blocked,[161]). When I offered to help them learn, they replied they do not have time.[162] I thought they intended to stop 11 February 2024 [163] but they have continued. // Timothy :: talk 15:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC). // Timothy :: talk 15:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism (i.e. giving him category of fascist leaders) Xaelor (talk) 15:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated recreation of a declined draft without adequate sourcing. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of linkspam. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 19:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will revert back to PC for the three months after that. Daniel Case (talk) 20:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This disambiguation page has seen an uptick of disruptive editing and vandalism since mid-January from IPs and newly created accounts arguing over some type of furry. It's not like daily but I think it could use some protection. (I tried to make this request a minute ago but a bot got rid of it for no reason). StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple socks over several days involved in edit-warring. There have been at least two confirmed socks of the same user ([164], [165], [166]) and in the last 24 hours at least 4 brand-new single-purpose accounts are participating in the same edit-war ([167], [168], [169], [170]). An SPI has been started for the latter (here), but this looks likely to continue in the near future. R Prazeres (talk) 19:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism. PC seems to be insufficient now. 2600:1008:B046:5F55:498D:4C21:191D:9DB6 (talk) 20:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Restoring per log. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)