Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
36   Castaic Lake (talk) Add sources
13   Table Mountain (Butte County, California) (talk) Add sources
10   Morgan Hill Unified School District (talk) Add sources
3   County Line Road (Santa Clara–Stanislaus counties, California) (talk) Add sources
107   American Discovery Trail (talk) Add sources
36   California State Route 152 (talk) Add sources
175   Morgan Hill, California (talk) Cleanup
19   Alameda Creek (talk) Cleanup
55   Oak Ridge High School (El Dorado Hills, California) (talk) Cleanup
166   Santa Clara Valley (talk) Expand
18   MotoGP 15 (talk) Expand
20   Bay Area Ridge Trail (talk) Expand
14   SBK X: Superbike World Championship (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,259   Crossword (talk) Unencyclopaedic
149   Richmond High School (Richmond, California) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,246   Standard Chinese (talk) Merge
3,220   Portuguese language (talk) Merge
38,046   Google (talk) Merge
16   Rancho San Antonio County Park (talk) Wikify
21   Pioneer High School (San Jose, California) (talk) Wikify
25   Games World of Puzzles (talk) Wikify
2   Valley Water Mill Pond (talk) Orphan
2   Fightin' Words (talk) Orphan
2   Kern Canyon (Stanislaus County) (talk) Orphan
3   Los Gatos Creek Park (talk) Stub
9   Joseph D. Grant County Park (talk) Stub
4   Vasona Reservoir (talk) Stub
4   Hellyer County Park (talk) Stub
8   Coyote Lake (Santa Clara County, California) (talk) Stub
5   Salmon Creek Falls (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
472   Freddy Fazbear's Pizzeria Simulator (talk) Add sources
101   Adam Montoya (talk) Add sources
199   Unturned (talk) Add sources
38   Video game writing (talk) Add sources
323   Tactical role-playing game (talk) Add sources
179   Clickteam (talk) Add sources
881   Annoying Orange (talk) Cleanup
683   Little Nightmares II (talk) Cleanup
200   Red Ventures (talk) Cleanup
374   Human: Fall Flat (talk) Expand
60   MagnaCarta 2 (talk) Expand
10,460   PlayStation 5 (talk) Expand
867   Five Nights at Freddy's: Sister Location (talk) Unencyclopaedic
240   Sex differences in human physiology (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,865   Scott Cawthon (talk) Unencyclopaedic
995   HP Inc. (talk) Merge
1,139   Bethesda Game Studios (talk) Merge
46   Bethesda Game Studios Austin (talk) Merge
363   Algerian Air Force (talk) Wikify
138   Crypt of the NecroDancer (talk) Wikify
307   Microtransaction (talk) Wikify
1   Rocket Robo (talk) Orphan
64   20 Minutes Till Dawn (talk) Orphan
3   Toasty: Ashes of Dusk (talk) Orphan
32   Tucker Boner (talk) Stub
296   One Piece Odyssey (talk) Stub
5   Contemporanul (talk) Stub
36   Hue (video game) (talk) Stub
25   Ronimo Games (talk) Stub
4   UNIVAC EXEC I (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robbery Bob has been accepted edit

 
Robbery Bob, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 11:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to subscribe to the WikiCup newsletter edit

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover art of Bit Pilot, Zach Gage, 2010.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cover art of Bit Pilot, Zach Gage, 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Letterpress (video game) edit

On 15 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Letterpress (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while developing the sound effects for Letterpress, Loren Brichter spit in his microphone? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Letterpress (video game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Letterpress (video game)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:03, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Talk:MrBeast/GA1 edit

Hey! I've noticed you closed the nomination above, but it doesn't seem to be closed for a valid reason. The review was started on 20 December and you posted a single suggestion on 1 January. Then on 23 January, it was suddenly closed as fail for the nominator being inactive for 7 days. But you barely even had started reviewing the article yet. The nominator wasn't even pinged or anything. These closes should only happen when the nomination is put on hold (so after the review is done) and the nominator fails to respond in a timely manner, but they had nothing to respond to begin with. I believe this close should be clarified. Skyshiftertalk 04:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bruh. I'm gonna trout myself for that.   Self-trout TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 04:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The point isn't to ping the nominator, but rather the reason the review was failed for, as I explained above. It is invalid to close a nomination for the nominator being inactive when you haven't even finished your review. If you just wanted to stop reviewing, you could've stated so instead. Skyshiftertalk 11:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't get anything TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 00:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
What did you not get? I explained above: "It is invalid to close a nomination for the nominator being inactive when you haven't even finished your review." I initially thought of posting the failed nomination directly at WT:GAN, but wanted to try to resolve with you directly first. Skyshiftertalk 00:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Now I get it. Thanks; will take into consideration for future GA reviews. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 02:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, and thanks for participating in this backlog drive! Just wanted to let you know that the review page is for editors to review references added by other editors. As in, a reviewer will randomly select an edit from a random editor to review, rather than you posting your edit there. The reviewed edits will then go under the reviewer's section. I've reviewed the 4 edits you posted there as an example. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 02:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ohhhhh I thought it was like the WikiCup where you add everything you've done. Did not know that. Thanks, TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 02:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the drive! edit

Welcome, welcome, welcome TrademarkedTWOrantula! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:56, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter edit

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer   Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infinite Craft has been accepted edit

 
Infinite Craft, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 19:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much edit

... for verifying so many articles! Your work helps make the drive secure against fraud attempts and false submissions. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

you're so very welcome ^-^ TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 03:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Beretta 9000 for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beretta 9000 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beretta 9000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

TrademarkedTWOrantula, I wanted to emphasize my sorrow at screwing you out of the point you deservedly earned for adding a source to the article. I PROD'd the thing with the idea that by the time the PROD expired, the month would be over and you'd have that point. Sadly, someone reverted my PROD so I had to defend my honor in that regard. I had reviewed your citation so hopefully you will be recompensated although the entry may drop from your log before then. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's aight man. I have a ton of articles I'm glad that they're referenced. We all make mistakes. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 02:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 26 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angels in the Infield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page McFarland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter edit

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to   Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

A citation barnstar for you edit

  The Citation Barnstar
For good work during WP: FEB24 drive! Davidindia (talk) 15:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for my (technically first) barnstar! TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 23:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Robbery Bob edit

On 3 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robbery Bob, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a reviewer thought that the video game Robbery Bob contained cringeworthy dialogue? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robbery Bob. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Robbery Bob), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award edit

 

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to TrademarkedTWOrantula for collecting more than 200 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Wonderputt edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wonderputt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 12:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Wonderputt edit

The article Wonderputt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wonderputt and Talk:Wonderputt/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 20:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Wonderputt edit

The article Wonderputt you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Wonderputt for comments about the article, and Talk:Wonderputt/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 20:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Squabble (video game) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Squabble (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Squabble (video game) edit

The article Squabble (video game) you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Squabble (video game) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A412 -- A412 (talk) 20:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Ride into the Mountains has been accepted edit

 
A Ride into the Mountains, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

VRXCES (talk) 05:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Overboard! (2021 video game) has been accepted edit

 
Overboard! (2021 video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 13:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Little to the Left has been accepted edit

 
A Little to the Left, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OceanHok (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Arcadia has been accepted edit

 
American Arcadia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 13:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter edit

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Grimace's Birthday edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grimace's Birthday you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cukie Gherkin -- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Grimace's Birthday edit

The article Grimace's Birthday you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Grimace's Birthday for comments about the article, and Talk:Grimace's Birthday/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cukie Gherkin -- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sweet Rose Creamery has been accepted edit

 
Sweet Rose Creamery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- NotCharizard 🗨 08:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

something to ask edit

thanks for asking me a good question on this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Entertainment#a_question_to_some_people but i cant go on the lost media wiki so i'll use wikipedia 2A02:8084:EA4:2B80:3DA5:C984:9F99:4E81 (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

You're very welcome. If you have GoAnimate, perhaps you could recreate the video as described by the script? TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 22:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
If I may ask, why could you not create an account on the Lost Media Wiki? TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 22:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter edit

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply