Talk:Snowy plover

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Bruxton in topic Did you know nomination
Featured articleSnowy plover is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 2, 2024.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 18, 2023Good article nomineeListed
December 20, 2023Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 3, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that female snowy plovers often abandon their families as soon as the chicks hatch?
Current status: Featured article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2020 and 31 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Oliviaaparra.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Grey Plover which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 1 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Camelia2328 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by SeaOtters123 (talk) 04:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Snowy plover/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SilverTiger12 (talk · contribs) 15:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


I'll take this review; as a first note, though, the Greek χαραδριός needs to be in a template: {{lang|grc|χαραδριός}}. I would also prefer that it be paired with the word Romanized, e.g. "...αἴλουρος/ailurus meaning 'cat'..." (templates: {{lang|grc|αἴλουρος}}/{{transl|grc|ailurus}}). Expect the rest of the review later today. Good luck and happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 15:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ok I tried. Not sure if it has to be charadrios or kharadriós; both seem to be valid. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for picking this up so quickly! It is my first bird article, and I am curious about your comments. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Comments:

  • When defending a territory, males may attempt to intimidate conspecifics by using the... Conspecifics? Do you mean other male snowy plovers? If so, then just say, "..attempt to intimidate each other..." You use the odd "conspecific" later on in that same paragraph; it's a bit jargon-y so you might want to change it there too.

And that was basically the only issue I found. Nice work! --SilverTiger12 (talk) 01:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

    • Thank you! I replaced the jargon term with "intruders". Your suggestion with "each other" does not entirely work because the sentence indicates that it is only the defending plover who intimidates. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 01:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 15:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Snowy plover with chicks

Improved to Good Article status by Jens Lallensack (talk). Self-nominated at 20:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Snowy plover; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Article promoted to GA status on November 18. Well-written article and interesting hooks (esp. ALT0). Strongly approve once QPQ completed.  Ploni💬  15:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Ploni: Thank you very much! Regarding the QPQ: This is my second DYK nomination, and I also did one review (now added above). Jens Lallensack (talk) 18:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Perfect! Approved.    Ploni💬  18:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Jens Lallensack and Ploni: I like ALT0 but it does not appear to be supported in our article. Our article seems to say some females abandon chicks after the eggs hatch and some do not. Will add "some" to the hook without objection.
*ALT3: ... that some female snowy plovers abandon their families as soon as the chicks hatch? Bruxton (talk) 15:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
See Special:Diff/1187500286 for discussion regarding hook on talk page Bruxton (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply