Talk:Adam and Eve
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adam and Eve article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Regarding the use of the word "myth"
The meaning of "myth", in the context of this article's lead, can be found in wikt:myth: Lengthy discussion of this usage can be found in the archives of this talk page (and in those of the talk pages of a number of related articles). Please drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Adam and Eve. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Adam and Eve at the Reference desk. |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience In December of 2006 the Arbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Should we add details from the “Genesis creation narrative” page? edit
Its first four paragraphs are generally pretty good. I think this page needs to incorporate specifically the explanation for them as demythologized Babylonian creation myths. IncandescentBliss (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2024 edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In Luke 3 it shows the genealogy of Jesus right through to Adam. Your information needs to be corrected. There aren’t two separate accounts of creation either, they are the same. One provides an overview while the other is more detailed. It is quite possible too that the authors may have been different and provided those insights by God in different ways for the same message. So as a correction there is direct linage from Jesus back to Adam. Jesus is often referred to as the second Adam. The first bought death and the second bought life. 220.235.136.97 (talk) 19:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jamedeus (talk) 19:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Criticism as Praxis edit
This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 February 2024 and 24 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Keegancroteau12 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Keegancroteau12 (talk) 04:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)