Blocked user Kingcutie under new sockpuppet HDClear

It appears that user Kingcutie is once again vandalizing his brother's wikipedia page under sockpuppet HDClear, for which he was previously banned by you.

It's not entirely clear to me how to proceed with bringing attention to this.

WIKI PAGE: Har Mar Superstar

OLD USER: User:Kingcutie

NEW USER: User talk:HDClear

NICTON t’s block

Hi Bbb, I don’t understand your NOTHERE block of NICTON t. Their outburst about Doug Weller is certainly weird and a waste of time, but do you really believe this person can’t possibly have anything to contribute to the project? Their behavior seems to me like that of an overzealous, trigger-happy newbie who doesn’t yet understand how to interpret standard template warnings and communications on Wikipedia. I remember when I started editing I thought every CTOP alert I got was a passive-aggressive flick. But I picked it up, and the odds of me raising a similarly baseless complaint to NICTON t’s at ANI went from nonzero to zero. Would you consider amending their indef block to something shorter or more targeted? Zanahary 02:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The user can make an unblock request, and it will be reviewed.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail

 
Hello, Bbb23. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 16:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Doug, I often forget that you are from the States. You edited that article way back in 2011...I guess it's still on your watchlist (only has 4 watchers) because you knew I'd edited it. BTW, I have no interest in the article or the building - I often click on "Random article" when I'm bored and have nothing else I feel like doing on Wikipedia. Pretty amazing what you see. I apparently touched a nostalgic chord, though. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
You did. I don't think I get bored, in fact I need to spend less time chasing down vandals or suspect edits and actually writing an article! Doug Weller talk 08:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Adelsoft

If you examine their user talk page on the Persian Wikipedia (I used Google Translate) you will see that their interactions there are similar to those here. I have also found wikiversity:Adel shirazy, which I have asked to be deleted as out of scope. I see a determined attempt at (probable self)-promotion. You view may differ. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looking at their global contributions, I wonder whether the threshold has been reached for global locks for spamming/advertising. I hesitate to request such a stringent measure without a second opinion. I am pretty sure they are Shirazy, or are paid by Shirazy. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Further research has shown the extent of cross wiki spamming. I have made the request to the stewards. They are wiser than I am so will decide what is appropriate. On fawiki they have already admitted to sockpuppetry on their talk page. It is the cross wiki spamming that concerns me though. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
And so it proved. Ah well. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
And so it proved. I'm a bit lost. What proved what?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
That the stewards are wiser than I am, 🤡 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'll be more direct: what action, if any, did the stewards take?--Bbb23 (talk) 12:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry for being obtuse. None. They had received a prior report which they deemed non actionable, and set mine aside because of that. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
You're forgiven, but only because I'm fond of the word obtuse. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Related to this editor and person, please may I have your opinion on the following:
  • This website has a wikipedia logo at its foot
  • Clicking that logo leads to https://wiki.sts.ir/Adel_Shirazy.html which purports to be a WMF site
  • While it has most of the lookj and feel of a Wikipedia, that is incomplete, thus I feel it may be "Passing an Off" as a true WMF site. I am aware that any text on a real WMF site is able to be used under the the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and GFDL, but WMF may have technical reasons for objecting
I have no idea where to go with this information. I'm asking you because I trust your opinions. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm not an expert on what the Foundation considers legal, and I have no opinion on whether you should report it to the Foundation. My mixed experience with the Foundation is they may not even respond, but if that doesn't bother you (I'm not fond of it personally) ... --Bbb23 (talk) 12:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I also have a jaded opinion of the foundation. I'll have a hunt and just fire and forget I think. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tiyyar article protection

hello Bbb23, the article at Tiyyar keep getting vandalized by anonymous IPs. Sources added by other editors have been deleted by this anonymous IP and they move the current status of the community to the history section, which is not a suitable place for it. The IP also not using Talk Page, only reverting. So I request Extended Page Protection for the page. Piyush Chekavar (talk) 09:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've blocked Special:contributions/2600:4040:4521:900:0:0:0:0/64 for one month for block evasion. Your request for protection is at WP:RFPP, and another admin will evaluate it.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply