Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2023/02
- 2023
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 February 2023
Reason: Repeatedly deleted and recreated as a test page. Mast303 (talk) 04:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- But isn't that the point? Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- No? It's a mainspace article. Test pages don't belong in mainspace. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined They shouldn't be in mainspace, but this is all in all only a small problem...easy to tag it as a test page, easy to delete as a test page. Let's call it a bit of an outlet/service to new users. If any other admin sees the dire need to protect...go right ahead. Lectonar (talk) 12:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- No? It's a mainspace article. Test pages don't belong in mainspace. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Reason: disruptive editing by sock Magherbin (talk) 16:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:54, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: socking and disruptive edits goes back to June 15th of last year Magherbin (talk) 16:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The article on Sindhis should have its protection increased due to the high levels of IP vandalism in the past and to avoid unnecessary edits by non-registered users. This is especially important given that this particular article has been subject to significant disruption from anonymous editors, which could lead to inaccurate or potentially damaging information being added. Increasing protection would ensure that only registered users with a valid purpose are able to make changes, thus ensuring accuracy and consistency for global readers. TheBushSush (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 02:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Page has been constantly been vandalised with Olympiacos' fans putting Karaiskakis Stadium at second place. This edit warring has been going back and forth the past few months, with it having been reverted back and forth 10 times. This is the second request I submit for this page, the last one being rejected for insufficient warring, but now edit warring with IPs has gone out of control. Tranquill Komnin (talk) 18:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 21:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Has died down in the meantime. Lectonar (talk) 12:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Severe IP vandalism and disruption which has seen an uptick in the last month. A mid-term semi is needed. Gotitbro (talk) 22:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The recent surge in vandalism. EDJT840 (talk) 00:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 12:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from IP users resumed after recent protection expired. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Page relates to Arab-Israeli conflict. This is already coming into play after recent events that happened a couple of weeks ago. (Requesting ECP for this page).... ArnavSharma602 (talk) 02:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Repeated addition of WP:INDISCRIMINATE cruft by an now blocked Sakuranbo97, which is escalated into WP:3RR. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:9585:F64B:E1C3:B891 (talk) 03:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Semi'd until February 2 by Jauerback. ECP isn't needed. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of IP edits + reverts on a man who recently died 45BearsFan (talk) 04:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Recent tampering. Potential removal of information done out of spite. 2607:FEA8:2340:7270:D8A3:C9D5:5E90:4AF0 (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hmmm...i don't know about your definition for "recent"...but the last edit was on december 9th, last year. Lectonar (talk) 10:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 10:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Goes along with The Kingdom of Wales ~ Eejit43 (talk) 13:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Goes along with Kingdom of Wales. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 13:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. This page has ongoing vandalism from IP addresses and has had for as long as I've watched it. I assume this will never end. CT55555(talk) 17:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:25, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: One particular anonymous user, using a dynamic IPv6 address that changes with each edit, persistently making an unsourced and dubious claim and edit warring when reverted. When warned about behavior, user continued to edit-war and demanded I "stop destroying the page." As it is not a fixed IP and part of the page is about a pending major event, page is a likely target for vandals, so semi-protection would be warranted J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 23:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 2601:19C:4A08:0:0:0:0:0/49 for a spell. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: high level AssyrianProud (talk) 00:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please don't use this board until you understand our protection policy. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent target of disruption by WP:LTA. Other articles may follow. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:4C4B (talk) 03:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Same long term disruption as at Consumption of Tide Pods. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:4C4B (talk) 03:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We're coming up on the annual Superbowl, and like clockwork, we're getting IPs making edits which have to be reverted. If we can protect against IPs for another 10-11 days, that will help. Tarl N. (discuss) 05:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 05:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy- 05:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Possible long term IP vandalism. EnIRtpf09bchat with me 07:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Constant changing of "soccer" to "football" by IPs, which is not in line with WP:NCFA. Page was semi-protected for a week - the day the protection expired, and IP once again made the change. Requesting longer or even permanent semi-protection. -- SuperJew (talk) 09:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Plethora of really stark editing by various IPs without discussion. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 10:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Misinformation, false and/or propaganda content referring Sokollus Serbian heritage and ethnicity should be removed. The complete text to be reviewed and referenced. 212.71.208.97 (talk) 10:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 11:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Czello 12:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. ManaliJain (talk) 13:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed immediately after the last protection expired. Still Orchomen. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:54, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, specifically intentional misgendering of a transgender womanCsa19 (talk) 01:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Csa19: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Very persistent nationalist editing. Uness232 (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined One instance in about 4 months isn't what I would call persistent. Lectonar (talk) 15:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The vandalism was regarding an alumni that other alumni deemed unacceptable. There have been thorough and monthly discussions and learning that the Wikipedia listing is accurate. There will be no further vandalism of trying to remove the alumni, as they did attend the Academy. TrueCadence (talk) 15:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done Edit requests are working fine; I'm not convinced by your assurances, and anticipate that disruption around Khalifa's entry would immediately resume. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors repeated changing DOB away from sourced year. Ravensfire (talk) 14:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: To prevent further undiscussed moves[1][2] and avoiding WP:RECENT and WP:TOOSOON. For a professional wrestler, it usually takes 3-6 months to establish the new ring name. So I suggest 3-month protection. Users can start a requested move on the talk page at anytime and if community reach a consensus, we can move the article to the new name. Mann Mann (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after a reported trade/hiring. Swagging (talk) 22:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP user evading a block on the 88.245.16.0/21 range. Paris1127 (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotection: Gamaliel semi'd this template in 2015... something tells me this is not an ongoing issue. jp×g 01:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Do we know if that was protected under WP:ARBGG (which would still make it an arbitration enforcement action even with GG being supplanted by WP:GENSEX)? —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 05:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- No reason was provided in the protection log. — xaosflux Talk 12:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- It looks like the page protection was done before the initial case closed. I would say WP:ARBGG applies as it's the de facto. – The Grid (talk) 18:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Nope - the prot (2015/02/02) was a few days after the case formally closed (2015/01/29). —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 20:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- It looks like the page protection was done before the initial case closed. I would say WP:ARBGG applies as it's the de facto. – The Grid (talk) 18:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- No reason was provided in the protection log. — xaosflux Talk 12:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Gamaliel: ping, FYI. We're wondering if there's any connection between this protection you applied and WP:ARBGG. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected. @JPxG: the protecting administrator informed me he has no objection to unprotecting. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
02 February 2023
Reason: IP editor who was previously engaged in an edit war in December has seemingly returned (with a different IP), now moving to the plot section and is changing Pinhead's credited name of "the Priest" to just Pinhead without providing a reliable source. Previously, the IP editor had been consistently changing a sentence in the opening paragraph and removing the reliable source I provided, and ignored the words "Do not remove" when editing. Seems like either semi-protection or extended confirmed protection could work to prevent the IP from making further disruptive edits on the article. Edwordo13 (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Unconstructive IP edits to a BLP on Russian Ukrainian war topic which non auto confirmed accounts can’t edit Volunteer Marek 19:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- It’s still going on. Volunteer Marek 18:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Can we PLEASE get this done? It's been going on for half a week now and it's just getting worse. Volunteer Marek 22:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. For three days. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Can we PLEASE get this done? It's been going on for half a week now and it's just getting worse. Volunteer Marek 22:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 20:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Frequently vandalized due to the suject being popular in memes. Semi-protection will probably suffice. 142.254.1.77 (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued re-addition of unsourced material. Onel5969 TT me 14:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have stopped after yesterday's edit war. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- It stopped, because I asked for the page to be protected, then the uncited information was re-added. Onel5969 TT me 04:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent Tunisia-based LTA/block evasion. Same exact issue at other already-protected articles including MBC 3, MBC 2 (Middle Eastern and North African TV channel), MBC 4, List of programmes broadcast by MBC 4, etc. Magitroopa (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This namespace was recently used in an attempt to get around the SALTed namespace Van Calebs. GPL93 (talk) 00:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 00:57, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also created a discussion on talk as none had been yet attempted. 01:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)BusterD (talk)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 20:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – the request was valid at the time, but there's been nothing in the past 24 hours. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed protection - New user who is apt to hit autoconfirmed status fairly soon is edit-warring to replace the redirect with a undersourced biography on an academic with dubious notability. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 00:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Continued discussion is sometimes helpful. BusterD (talk) 01:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant adding of the same bogus, offensive text by IPs. Cerebral726 (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2405:3800:800:0:0:0:0:0/40 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. And 118.101.222.211 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) as well. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Increased amount of IP/new editor vandalism and disruptive editing; scheduled as the TFA for February 1. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism/puffery which appears to originate from the law firm the article is about. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is a little puffery - a couple on January 31, one on January 25 - but before that it goes back to December. If puffery continues or increases, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 02:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, especially on box office figures. Sneha996 (talk) 15:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism even after a 3-day semi-protection by IP editors. Iaintfaking (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:48, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 04:48, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has faced persistent vandalism of the same unsourced information from various IP addresses. Since this seems to be the same user adding unsourced information despite direct explanations in the talk page as to why this information was removed, some form of protection might prevent further vandalism. If there is another form of protection I should be requesting, please let me know. Owlettes (talk) 04:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
This Page Page Is About Newly Famous Person In Bangladesh.He Is Known As Musical Artist and Journalist.I Think Mistakenly I My Be Deleted .Please Sir Allow Protection About This Page : High level of IP vandalism. Touhid888 (talk) 01:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – No such page. If you are referring to User:Touhid888, it was deleted (twice) as a blatant attempt to use Wikipedia as a webhost. Favonian (talk) 08:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting permanent template-protection as this is required by Module:AnnotatedLink (also needs protection) which is invoked by the currently protected high-risk {{annotated link}}. All these are currently hovering near 7,000 tranclusions. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs
11:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: User:Magnolia677 continues to revert article content specifically requested by reviewers during GA and FA review process of this article. Consequently, I am no longer certain this article meets FA criteria due to this user's continued edit warring and reversions. I will be requesting FA re-assessment of this article once the page is protected with the original content required for promotion and the request that this user be blocked. This user has a history of removing relevant, neutrally-phrased, reliably-sourced material from pages as stated by many other users on his talk page. DrGregMN (talk) 01:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Talk:Manganese, Minnesota#Undue geologic details would be a good place to start. The discussion was initiated on January 23, but so far only Magnolia677 has weighed in. Favonian (talk) 09:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Certain partial edit conflict between certain editors. CastJared (talk) 09:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Squatch347 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. The suggested protection wouldn't help. as the combatants are extended-confirmed. Favonian (talk) 09:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Getting bombarded with spam from a string of sockpuppets. Ravenswing 11:57, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Favonian (talk) 12:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 18:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and removal of sourced content without explanation. Iaof2017 (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Edit and vandalism. 2402:E280:2325:198:597F:59F1:AF81:472E (talk) 11:48, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Unidentifiable article. Favonian (talk) 12:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing, which immediately resumed following previous page protection's lift. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 15:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP edit warring and vandalism. This has been happening across Peru-related articles. WMrapids (talk) 23:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I move protected to prevent any additional move warring. I did not protect the article itself because this is basically a content dispute between those who want to say "massacre" and those who want to say "incident". It's not serious enough (yet) to require full protection. But the disputing parties need to discuss this question on the talk page, which is currently not happening. MelanieN (talk) 17:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: An unregistered user coming from multiple IP addresses in the 240B:C020:4XXX block has been editing disruptively:
- In edit summaries, they have accused editors of "prejudice and racism".
- In edit summaries, they have called other editors' edits "ridiculous" and "lies".
- They have deleted sources.
- They have not engaged on Talk despite repeated requests to.
- They have repeatedly reverted (edit warring).
Since their IP address is not stable (they have used 7 so far), it seems that the only way to stop the disruption and encourage the editor to discuss on Talk is semi-protection. Macrakis (talk) 23:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The never ending edit war on this article between its Nepal or Tibet is happening again. FlalfTalk 14:55, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —ScottyWong— 15:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection, since a vandal keeps adding the same unsourced content repeated through multiple IPs. They are ignoring discussion and warnings. Yuchitown (talk) 15:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. —ScottyWong— 15:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- They keep using different IPs:
- User contributions for 216.223.195.152
- User contributions for 171.236.69.69 (blocked, one month)
- User contributions for 171.236.69.74 (also blocked, one month)
- User contributions for 171.236.69.174 (also blocked)
- User contributions for 2402:800:6342:FDEB:597D:BB66:5214:DF81
- This individual is obsessed and is just going to keep going. Please semi-protect this article. Yuchitown (talk) 04:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Yuchitown
- They keep using different IPs:
Reason: The talk page doesn't appear to require protection, looking at the revision history there's nothing really untoward there. I just wanted to ask why the article is so out of date since the new revision for training ChatGPT got. 2001:8003:37B8:D900:1507:8D7D:250F:7725 (talk) 12:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP level and new user vandalism. Adding misleading information to the article. Cybavortex143 (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A few problem edits two days ago, but not since. Hopefully the problem has subsided. MelanieN (talk) 17:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- List of current National Football League head coaches (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Lots of unsourced info and vandalism in past couple of days from IP and new editors. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 17:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Mass spam about "Turning Red" by IPs. 5.20.227.211 (talk) 20:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Widr. BusterD (talk) 20:41, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:43, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced and made up content by multiple editors (confirmed as made up at WT:CRIC#ICC Women's Under-19 Cricket World Cup), along with repeated MOS:INFOBOXFLAG violations by multiple editors. We shouldn't be allowing this systematic abuse of Wikipedia. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:14, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If talk page discussions resolve some of these issues earlier, feel free to request an early end to the protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – About as soon as the last protection expired, the same incorrect edits (claiming the station started in 1926 as an NBC affiliate — a highly dubious claim on both counts for a Mexican television station) that led to that protection resumed. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: A lot of unhelpful, disruptive, and unsourced edits by IP users. Mann Mann (talk) 05:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once again, repeated addition of unsourced (and incorrect) character last names, for which the page was previously protected. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Nearly the entire edit history going back to at least June 2020 is vandalism and reverts. While semi-protected for a year between March 2021 and March 2022, there was no vandalism, but since that protection expired, vandalism by IPs and newer accounts again comprises the majority of edits. Please consider permanent semi-protection. Toadspike (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 20:43, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Continuous IP vandalism DMVHistorian (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP edit warring. Iaof2017 (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated obvious sockpuppetry, removal of AfD. Always using 'Admin' as the summary. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated obvious sockpuppetry, removal of AfD. Always using 'Admin' as the summary. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:53, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumed after last 2 month protect expired. Dynamic IP falsifying info continues. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:23, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:53, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
03 February 2023
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per Wikipedia:PIA. Qwv (talk) 19:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like there's been any disruption since May. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism over the past few days. Likely going to be a lot more for the next two weeks based on the upcoming Super Bowl. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 21:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 22:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The creator of the article has had their completely unsourced article about a living person draftified several times. However, they just copy-paste their sandbox back into the main page, with no regard for the objections of other users. (Could also just block the user too). Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 12:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent ignorance of MOS guidelines. When protected, this edit is what should be mained, as it follows MOS guidelines, as outlined by MOS:DTAB and MOS:ACCESS. livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Mmaabento (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. BusterD (talk) 21:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of disruption this month. Disruption has been increasing in this article since at least November. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. Previously requested for it, but didn't go through. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:57, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:53, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. IP editor won't stop adding WP:SYNTH or WP:OR to this BLP CT55555(talk) 21:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 01:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Another return of persistent vandalism and egregious BLP violations immediately after expiration of previous protection. Page has been a long-term vandalism target. See page's protection history. Mauderdale (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator K6ka. One year. Fuzheado | Talk 01:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing. The Doom Patrol (talk) 06:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and POV pushing by new users who don't seem to be WP:HTBAE, inherently controversial topic MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 08:33, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP users behind who I suspect the subject of the article have for years consistently edited the article, often adding unsourced praise. I added a long descriptions of my findings to the talk page back in 2021, where I came to the conclusion that the article was very likely mostly written by the subject himself, in blatant violation of WP:CONFLICT. Since then this pattern has persisted, for example with the same IP address adding praise back in without addressing any of the concerns regarding WP:CONFLICT and WP:V. At this point I think only deleting the article or semi-protecting it will help. QuaintlyLittoral (talk) 13:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
In the infobox image caption, "States where English is a working languages
of the government" is incorrect - should be singular ("language").
To be even more correct, the sentence should either read "States where English is a working language of the government, a
language of education, or spoken by more than 20% of the population" or perhaps "States where English is a working language of the government, language of education, or is
spoken by more than 20% of the population". I leave the level of pedantry up to you.
(Can't make a talk page request, it's also semi-protected) 199.208.172.35 (talk) 19:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring. Disruptive editing from which there is an insistence that the band are a trio when there are no sources proving that they aren't. HorrorLover555 (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Fuzheado | Talk 01:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created and used as a bypass on the protection at Tylerbrizyy. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Liz. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I can't move it Alanwrick1 (talk) 06:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Alanwrick1: You shouldn't move it anywhere until the draft has been accepted. —ScottyWong— 08:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined —ScottyWong— 08:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Remove the founders - James McLamore and David Edgerton as they are not Hungry Jack's founders. It is soely founded by Jack Cowin. As the Director of Brand for Hungry Jack's, Jack Cowin has specifically requested they be removed. HungryJacksAustralia (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
In the section "Genetics of race and intelligence", add this at the end of the second paragraph: By contrast, T. Warne (2021) argues that within the United States, a >0% genetic origin of intra-group differences in intelligence is probable, and discusses five lines of research to support this contention. END OF PROPOSED EDIT.
Here is the source: https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.134.4.0479 . The American Journal of Psychology is a reputable source. This specific paper discusses some of the literature concerning the situation in the US. The author of the paper, Russel T. Warne, is a psychologist and researcher. He also serves on the editorial board for the journal Intelligence. 185.183.147.233 (talk) 00:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please note that the requested edit would violate WP:FRIND, given that Warne's stated position is definitely FRINGE, as determined by strong consensus at the most recent Race and intelligence RfC. This is assuming that the IP meant to write "inter-group differences" rather than "intra-group differences" –– Warne's article argues the former, and only the former would be relevant in any case. Generalrelative (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Frankly, register an account if you want to make these kinds of edits to these kinds of articles. You can't expect to make controversial edits on controversial articles by proxy. —ScottyWong— 08:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 21:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disrputive editing from user:Scabab and anonymous IPs in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting indefinite semi page protection - constant IP alteration of cited data relating to date of death and height. McPhail (talk) 11:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected There is a slight spike in the last 2 weeks or so...all in all, pending-changes protection should be enough. Lectonar (talk) 12:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected; once the temporary protection expired, the bad IP edits/vandalism continued where they left off. I think an extended protection period would be good here. DecafPotato (talk) 03:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing mainly coming from IPs- includes vandalism/nonconstructive edits as well as unsourced changes/additions. Magitroopa (talk) 04:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This page is again being altered by multiple IPs on a daily basis. Last time it was around the removal of material the IPs thought derogatory. Now it’s a pointless debate over whether the article should say London, England or London, UK. Previously, a seven-day period where only registered users could edit was helpful, and I think it might be useful again. KJP1 (talk) 07:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopping vandal is hitting it fairly hard. Millahnna (talk) 13:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator K6ka. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Perennial LTA target. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Perennial LTA target. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:53, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Very high level of IP vandalism by what seems to be an individual, or several individuals, evading ban(s). Hey man im josh (talk) 14:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Roundish ⋆tc) 02:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement isn't quite the right term for this, but this article is covered by a community-authorized extended-confirmed restriction per WP:GS/AA. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Firefangledfeathers that restriction does not apply to the talk pages however, did you mean to link to the article instead? McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I did! Want me to refile? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Numerous IPs are making unsourced changes to programming and/or channels, not all of which appear to be correct in any way. (This is not a new problem; there are two previous semi-protections for this reason.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:44, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 16:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism and addition of unsourced and rumored/untrue crap by different unregistered users. FrB.TG (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 15:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ZLEA T\C 04:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 10:44, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP editor. Ckfasdf (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Semi protected you need registered users only 112.209.31.29 (talk) 11:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Semi protected no IP Users 112.209.31.29 (talk) 11:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 13:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. by Bbb23. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This article is on the brink of an edit war. Author does not like it when the article is neutralised and tries to chase me away. The Banner talk 16:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Unnecessary. I've already said in my edit summary I will not edit war. Editor continues to follow me and my work, adding tags unnecessarily and removing sourced details. I've asked them to leave me alone multiple times. This is just additional drama; no need to protect page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:33, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- You are not the owner of the articles you have written. That you want to restore irrelevant and spammy details is not in the best interest of the encyclopedia. You should work on your editing style. The Banner talk 16:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Katietalk 15:57, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Author does not like it when the article is neutralised and claims ownership. The Banner talk 16:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Once again, entirely unnecessary (see Acadia: A New Orleans Bistro above). I've been clear I am not going to edit war. Editor continues to follow me, adding tags unnecessarily and removing sourced details, even when other editors have disagreed with The Banner's assessments. I would like for this editor to please leave me alone, which I've requested multiple times now. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Katietalk 15:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting for the second time. Persistent, disruptive edit-warring and vandalism from multiple IPs and unregistered users. Novemberjazz 19:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- "Unregistered users" are the same thing as IPs. If they have a username then they are automatically registered. I would assume you mean new users? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:15, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:57, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: Sanctions enforcement. 2603:8000:C000:58BB:0:0:0:100B (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Which sanctions? Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- WP:ARBIP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- But these just introduce contentious topic, they do not authorise blanket ecp protection such as for example PIA. I do not see any ongoing disruption in the article which would require any protection. Ymblanter (talk) 14:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's my understanding (I can't find the page that says this, but everyone involved in this topic area seems to believe it) that the CT designation authorizes admins to impose ECP with less discussion than usual. I have certainly done this in the past without complaint.
- This is probably moot, though, as you are correct that disruption on this page is at the moment minimal. Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- But these just introduce contentious topic, they do not authorise blanket ecp protection such as for example PIA. I do not see any ongoing disruption in the article which would require any protection. Ymblanter (talk) 14:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- WP:ARBIP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brojam (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- At this point it's been about five hours since the last disruptive edits. Let's see if maybe things calm down. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry as well-see page's history. Tails Wx 17:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most but not all of the socks have been blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – "Arbitration enforcement" isn't quite the right term for this, but this article is covered by a community-authorized extended-confirmed restriction per WP:GS/AA. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Continuing to make unsourced content about composers from IPs. LancedSoul (talk) 18:54, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think protection is needed for this or the above article. It appears to have just been a random burst in vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 194.230.146.125 (talk) 14:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Please don’t say this person is Antisemitic. He is not
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Target not specified. Favonian (talk) 17:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
04 February 2023
Temporary semi-protection: Administrators this show requires a temporary semi-protection as due to ongoing conflict controversy between actress Shilpa Shinde and leads Gulki Joshi and Sonali Naik , their fans are coming up with multiple IP addresses and doing Unconstructive edits according to their convenience. So please provide a semi-protection for atleast 2 months till this matter closes completely. Pri2000(talk) 18:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last such activity was two days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 20:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 78.86.165.48 (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. BusterD (talk) 22:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Name and date of birth changes have persisted by a small number of user accounts and IP users. This has occurred since April 2021. Dawnseeker2000 01:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: I am going to vandalize it to this status, so preemptive protection is required. 213.91.248.157 (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 213.91.248.157 (talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. BusterD (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has recently been the target of a sockfarm with new accounts vandalising. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 02:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (comment) 02:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has recently been the target of a sockfarm with new accounts vandalising. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 02:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (comment) 02:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Spike in unsourced edits by new and anonymous (IP) editors. Anonymous editors (likely one person hopping to different IPs) have resorted to using personal attacks and insults on other editors. Yue🌙 22:11, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined IP vandal was already blocked, and the remaining new user seems to be acting in relatively good faith and engaging in discussion on their talk page. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism; content blanking; source blanking. Professor Penguino (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: Automated long-term abuse from autoconfirmed accounts. 79.184.77.98 (talk) 00:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- @SunilNevlaFan: Is talk page protection something you would want? To the IP: We don't normally protect user talk pages when it's avoidable. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- First, IP editor, thanks for requesting protection. Second, @GorillaWarfare I think that a few days or a week of extended-confirmed protection would help alleviate the situation. SunilNevlaFan✨ 03:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 01:44, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Gorilla Warfare. RegentsPark (comment) 02:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: vulnerable to sporadic vandalism by unregistered users. Ppt91 (talk) 02:44, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 11:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Increase protection from semi-protection to extended confirmed protection: High level of disruptive edits by auto-confirmed users. Treetoes023 (talk) 04:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:50, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:50, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 05:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:53, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Semi protection on this page has recently expired. Since it's still a red-hot topic (not least on social media) disruption has resumed. Suggest semi'ing again for a year in the hope things will have quietened down by next year. Bon courage (talk) 06:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits against WP:GENDERID. Sjö (talk) 06:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes by IPs. No significant changes from last good version despite high edit rate. Ab207 (talk) 08:44, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Clear UPE issues here, so any new article about this should go through AfC. bonadea contributions talk 08:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – As with the article about the first season, this is a target of UPE editors trying to promote a brand-new TV show, so any new article about this should go through AfC. bonadea contributions talk 08:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated spamming in the "Notable people" section by new accounts and IPs. Gotitbro (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:19, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. – 2.O.Boxing 14:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Request permanent template-protection for this module invoked by already protected high-risk Template:Annotated link. This module replaces the already protected Module:AnnotatedLink due to name change the only way that seemed unlikely to go horribly wrong. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs
18:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 01:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been targeted for repeated vandalism by (likely) a single user using multiple IPs for 4 days running now. PritongKandule-✉️📝 03:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined I'm loathe to protect an article while an AfD is ongoing and there's been no disruption for around 12 hours. We might just have to play whack-a-mole for a week. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. A09 (talk) 09:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:10, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated blanking by an IP whom I can't seem to report at AIV (reports keep getting removed with no action taken by the bot due to a partial rangeblock). Millahnna (talk) 10:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. By Materialscientist. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has recurred today. Geoff | Who, me? 17:32, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has started to occur again after the original page protection was expired. Sahas P. (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 19:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
05 February 2023
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An IP was disruptively editing the article, rearranging cast members in violation of MOS:TVCAST guideline. They received a two-week block, but now newly registered accounts are editing in a similar, disruptive pattern to the blocked IP, so very probable block evasion. I have filed a sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JEBahrain concerning this. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined if your suspicions are deemed correct at SPI, as seems likely, the users will be blocked and a checkuser can block the underlying IP if necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by autoconfirmed users. Poodle23 (talk) 17:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Quiero poner candado a mi articulo por problemas de falsa información que le hacen muchas veces a mi articulo diciendo que el cantante nacio en otra ciudad y entre otras cosas. asi que quiero el candado para que mi articulo no sea editado 186.21.15.22 (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done Este artículo (ni Cris MJ) no existe aquí en enwiki. --Kinu t/c 20:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Recently a scandle has broke out regarding this company in the international media. Hence, IP's are consitniously editing is page either adding or removing informations. Please semi-protect this page for 2 months until the dust settles down. Rüdiger.Ingrid (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Information was deleted that has proper sources TheRightStuff01 (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive bad redirect overwriting by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:50, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor to prioritize AfD. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive bad redirect overwriting by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:50, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor to prioritize the current Articles for deletion discussion on this article. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive bad redirect overwriting by IP hopper. Resumed years after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor to prioritize AfD. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive bad redirect overwriting by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor to prioritize AfD. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive bad redirect overwriting by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor to prioritize AfD. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism and disruptive editing recently. Herbfur (He/Him) (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. For two years. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit conflicts over her date of death. $chnauzer 21:53, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 23:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism Vidpro23 (talk) 22:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 05:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Create protection - repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine (talk) 00:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Create protection - repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine (talk) 02:26, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last created over two years ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Continued introduction of unsourced information —chaetodipus (talk) 03:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:7550:7A60:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Covers the vast majority of those IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: Long-term sockpuppetry by a community banned Indian user. 58.69.78.101 (talk) 04:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism on a contentious BLP. Most of them are violating WP:BLP and even adding Urdu version of Mir Jafar which is not acceptable unless proved with reliable sources. Most of the controversies stuff is based on primary sources (accussations). Please protect it under pending changes review. 109.171.194.161 (talk) 05:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Favonian (talk) 13:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 06:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated copy-paste moves from Hoshangabad by editors wanting the name changed - suggest Extended-confirmed protection Arjayay (talk) 12:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and edit warring by an IP user. Moreover, their edit summaries do not correspond to their edits D.Lazard (talk) 11:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Anarchyte (talk) 11:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant disruptive editing by several IP users: 176.72.32.190 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 193.210.162.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 193.210.195.126 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 193.210.196.123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 46.132.43.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and 46.132.23.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) since November 2022. IP users have ignored the warnings. Vacant0 (talk) 11:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:49, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism and disruptive editing by several IP users: 46.132.23.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 46.132.43.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 193.210.196.123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 193.210.195.126 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 193.210.162.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and 93.106.185.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) since November 2022. IP users have ignored the warnings. Vacant0 (talk) 11:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Levels of IP vandalism and some edit warring and disruptive editing from IP users. People are also changing things without a consensus. DDMS123 (talk) 00:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection - Edit-war between unregistered users over the style of English used in the article. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 02:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive editing. Protect the page for a long time. Yuugone (talk) 10:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Anarchyte (talk) 11:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- The article got unprotected on 31 January 2023 then anonymous IPs started making disruptive editing again. Yuugone (talk) 12:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued re-addition of uncited information. Onel5969 TT me 11:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The disruption started again just after the previous protection expired. M.Bitton (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and accounts with few edits keeps adding unsourced (and obviously fake) content. Mike Allen 15:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IPs keep making the same pov edits dealing with the subjects heritage. This has been going on for a while. The page needs to be locked. OyMosby (talk) 01:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are making disruptive edits. {{u|WikiWikiWayne}} {Talk}
14:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined it's highly topical at the moment so lots of edits, some less helpful than others, are to be expected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: it is very good Yolgizzero (talk) 14:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – That's good to know, but Wikipedia's protection policy does not recognize it as a valid reason for protecting an article. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Its almost 1 month of period is over for page protection of this page, no disruptive edits are done within this span and before it's protection also, so please reduce this page protection from indefinite to some period of months or better remove its protection if it possible. 49.32.161.75 (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Absence of disruption is a well-known side effect of article protection. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Changing box office collection values without citing a reliable source. Theoder2055 (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 19:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Growing movement from Twitter and Reddit to post unverified information Hazardous Matt (talk) 19:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 19:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism due to recent news. WhosJan (talk) 22:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism after reporting of death of headmistress in media. 82.24.199.222 (talk) 22:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
06 February 2023
Reason: Repeated vandalism by new users. Every edit since January has been reverted. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Continued disruptive editing by IP users. They repeatedly change things that require a consensus first. They also have edit wars by reverting edits by other users. DDMS123 (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptors back soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. I've also indef move protected. BusterD (talk) 23:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from multiple IPs throughout the day. Ppt91 (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. All that was needed was one small range block to stop some fairly trivial vandalism. Requesting indefinite semi-protection and posting at every noticeboard is a massive over reaction. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- HJ Mitchell Thank you for taking care of it and apologies for overreacting. It seemed overwhelming and labor-intensive at the moment as new IPs kept popping up. Ppt91 (talk) 21:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Two new SPAs doing coordinated disruptive editing. I want to avoid edit war or another 3RR violation. Thanks. -- Yae4 (talk) 19:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: An IP user (who uses different IP addresses, even) keeps adding original research to sections of the article, refusing to even cite the source they ostensibly have. Requesting protection for at least one month, because I'm certain they'll keep doing this until something is done. TheVHSArtist (talk) 19:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:58, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Recent rise in vandalism; topic is contentious and has previously been semi-protected. Ppt91 (talk) 21:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 21:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Donnowin1 (talk) 23:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bagumba. BusterD (talk) 01:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Donnowin1 (talk) 23:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bagumba. BusterD (talk) 01:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 23:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 01:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and nonsense requests over the past 48 hours. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 Chat Online 00:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page under attack. Speculation/uncited info by IP Users. Aloha27 talk 01:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:14, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Upcoming award event. IP editors keep adding false or unsourced performers or other incorrect information. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 18:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 02:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to persistent IP vandalism. I'd do it myself but am involved. Thank you! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You kids and your battleships... BusterD (talk) 03:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Partofthemachine (talk) 03:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A new editor, likely the one who has already been banned six times insists on his own edits without consulting with other editors. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The user insists on his own major edits without consulting with other editors, and without reaching a consensus. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 23:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper is persistently adding WP:OR about the reception of the film after multiple editors have reverted and explained why in edit summaries. They WP:IDONTHEARTHAT. Mike Allen 01:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. The last protection was for two years; the results speak (or rather don't) for themselves. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hoshangabad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Narmadapurm district (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)- Narmadapuram (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Narmadapuram district (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated cut&paste moves. Related pages and redirects also provided. Jalen Folf (talk) 09:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Scratch the district articles; I've taken care of a page swap that resolves the situation there. Only the page with the typo needs deleting. Jalen Folf (talk) 09:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Narmadapuram
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. for a year.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. on Hoshangabad; it seems to have just up and stopped 15 hours ago. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Narmadapuram
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from new accounts and IPs. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:14, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Being intensely edited, to be sure, and understandably so. But I don't see much vandalim or disruption, just a lot of the usual back and forth. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jakarta Goat vandal is back again. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 118.99.106.102 (talk · contribs). for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Unsupported additions by new user who is continuing the disruption of Special:Contributions/174.212.228.72. Binksternet (talk) 07:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:50, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Unhelpful changes to a specfic infobox parameter.[3][4][5][6][7][8] I request 3-6 month protection just like the current move protection for this article. Mann Mann (talk) 08:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Hamza Ali Shah Talk 10:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is having large volumes of material and sources removed by a non-autoconfirmed account created just today, but which has already reverted edits three times on the same page after their removals were undone by various different editors. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: There are repeated disruptive IP edits about Climate. I request a protection. Pbj25 (talk) 10:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- If the editing continues, I will request protection again. Pbj25 (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Pbj25: of course; please have a look at our protection policy in the meantime. Lectonar (talk) 11:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- If the editing continues, I will request protection again. Pbj25 (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: multiple socks repeatedly adding spam phone numbers - Arjayay (talk) 11:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism, disruptive edits and unsourced changes to a highly visible page. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 11:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Most of the IP edits are good, and protection would lead to collateral damage. Ymblanter (talk) 11:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Exactly. Lectonar (talk) 11:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:GS/CASTE. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of vandalism ollyhinge11 (talk) 14:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Complex/Rational 15:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:14, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent attempts by IP editors to claim Atsu died in the 6 February 2023 Turkey earthquake, with no attempts to provide a source for such claims. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic area, Russia-Ukraine war-related promotion. Please increase the protection to extended confirmed level as per the community consensus on such topics. Thanks! 37.115.225.152 (talk) 08:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant ethno-nationalistic disruption, constantly disregarding the high quality WP:RS, such as trying to replace it with deprecrated and/or centuries old sources, adding uncited info with their own words, or even simply just altering the sourced info. This has been ongoing for years now. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. Mr. Kenshin (talk) 13:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Bar Harel (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 18:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism resumed almost immediately after protection expired. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 17:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Complex/Rational 21:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP subject that has gone missing after the 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquakes. Repeated additions of death (mostly unsourced or without an RS) despite not being confirmed. ~StyyxTalk? 18:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
07 February 2023
Multiple article protection requests (rampant LTA IPs)
Reason: LTA/disruptive IP edits resumed once again a few days after the end of the recent page protection on MBC 2 (Middle Eastern and North African TV channel).
Additionally, I would like to request there additional articles for protection that are usual targets of the LTA IPs:
- MBC Max (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of cyberpunk works (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Category:Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Code Lyoko: Evolution (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Given how this continues at all their usual targeted articles across many different ranges, I would highly suggest a protection longer than just a month... Magitroopa (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Bar Harel (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been the subject of a long-term vandalism/POV-pushing campaign that has gone on for years. The page was protected back in June for a six-month period, but now that it's over, further efforts have been made to continue adding the exact same content. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 22:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ZLEA T\C 16:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Continued attempts to overwrite the merge consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now (The Carpenters song), possible LTA by Ajsillo302010. Maybe an full protection to happen to prevent unredirection per AFD. This needs to be SALTed to preserve the AFD consensus. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:61CA:570C:B9E4:F11B (talk) 19:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP Vandalism RowanJ LP2 (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: I am cautious so as not to jump the gun here, but the page has seen an increase in sporadic instances of vandalism over the last month that seems to have intensified over the last three days. Ppt91 (talk) 21:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Bar Harel (talk) 22:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IMO it should have been protected while it was Today's Featured Article; looks like it got pretty crazy. Hopefully that will subside now that it is no longer the TFA. MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Recently fired coach, getting alot of edits and reverts. May also want to protect Chris Armas RedPatch (talk) 22:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 01:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Intensified disruptive editing by multiple IPs in the past month, around the general map of highways in the lead section, despite local consensus.
Temporary pending changes protection preferred, as the article typically receives a low amount of editing, with a significant number of constructive edits coming from IP users. Ultravert 22:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 01:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent Vandalism, and due to controversy it's a high-risk page. Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy (talk) 23:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I suspect more or less indefinite pending changes protection will likely be the result for this article, but let's give this a few weeks for a start. Steven Walling • talk 01:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Several months doesn't seem to have done the trick and it's a BLP. Maybe after a year he won't be famous anymore. Steven Walling • talk 01:48, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs keep on adding records and statistics without proper source (most probably researched and added by themselves). This keeps on going for quite some time already. Engr. Smitty Werben 00:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 01:49, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonas kam (talk) 01:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 01:49, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Use for forum-style complaining and POV bludgeoning by IPs and SPAs. Dronebogus (talk) 12:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Not a lot of recent disruption; certainly not enough to get over the higher bar required for protecting article talk pages. Daniel Case (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: There have been numerous vandalism on this page. I hope it gets protected from them. Loibird90 (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Really don't see anything. Daniel Case (talk) 23:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, in terms of recent edits (starting from Jan 17) There has been 7 edits reverted, just to note, I'm not great with page protection, not sure if it changes your mind. Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection (anonymous users blocked from editing) for at least the next few weeks. This story came out today and we don't know what'll happen and people might make vandalous edits: https://www.jayski.com/2023/02/06/kyle-busch-arrested-with-gun-at-cancun-airport-in-january/ Cavanaughs (talk) 23:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Edit warring/content dispute by a bunch of IP editors trying to take out the same sourced paragraph. Yoshi24517 Chat Online 04:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected as community-authorized general sanction--Ymblanter (talk) 04:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism across multiple IPs. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2A00:1370:81A8:0:0:0:0:0/49 (talk · contribs). For half a year, from that article. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism Ex Veteran (talk) 03:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done. Removing copyright violations is not vandalism. User has been warned. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 04:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 09:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after previous protection expired. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Puerto Rico TV station articles
- WKAQ-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WAPA-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WIPR-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WSTE-DT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WLII-DT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WTCV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WJPX (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WMTJ (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WNJX-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WOLE-DT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- WORA-TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent unconstructive editing by IPs. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For all of them; in some, last disruptive edit was about 2 and more weeks ago. @Mvcg66b3r: please be so kind and read our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs within the past week. محرر البوق (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting full page protection. Manganese, Minnesota is a featured article. I am the primary author and promoter of this page. Both content and photos requested by GA and FA reviewers have been gutted and reverted on several occasions resulting in the start of an edit war between myself and User:Magnolia677. I am requesting this user be blocked from further edits of this article until it can be reassessed: I am not certain the removal of content by this user meets FA criteria anymore. This cannot be done without this user continually gutting reverted edits. I have already tried to make a peace offering by asking him to participate in my recent request for peer review of the article Withrow, Minnesota: instead of participating in the process, this user fired an opening edit salvo by gutting this article as well. I am requesting that Withrow, Minnesota also receive full page protection and User:Magnolia677 be blocked from further edits of this page at least until the article Manganese, Minnesota can be reassessed for FA criteria. DrGregMN (talk) 01:53, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The underlying problem wouldn't be solved by a full protection of any length; in the end, consensus about how the article should look needs to be found. Try to get some eyes on this; Wikipedia:Third opinion could be a good start. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by a number of IPs. David Biddulph (talk) 08:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism issues since Jan 26. —WildComet talk 04:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism Sartaj267 07:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Player under transfer speculation, constant IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 13:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent re-addition of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 14:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yeti Dai (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason getting a lot of vandalism. TartarTorte 15:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated attempts from multiple IPs to add an unsourced birth date to this BLP. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption is not high enough for semi-protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shorter period as talk pages have a higher threshold for protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism Sartaj267 07:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing for over two days. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For a couple of months - until the news cycle ends. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. TrangaBellam, some of the IPs editing there are actually right. Please check the dates in the article. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Kalsi is a pure Tarkhan tribe and again a propoganda is ran by jatt people to save their dipping pride by calling famous clans their.. i would request wikipedia to look into it. Mundaramgarhia (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done – You already have an open request at the article talk page – the appropriate venue. It will be dealt with – appropriately. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be some argument over his goal tally which has caused disruptive edits. Suggest two-weeks protection. Govvy (talk) 10:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- The article might be okay without this, compared to yesterday the disruption has died down. Govvy (talk) 12:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor for now. Nothing in the past eight or so hours; can be re-requested if necessary. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism on the TP. Lard Almighty (talk) 13:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2601:842:200:47E0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by DanCherek. One other IP. Talk pages are only protected for most severe cases of vandalism; disruption rate is not high enough. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High volume disruptions for a recently married celebrity. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined for now. I've warned the main source of the disruption. If it continues, they can be blocked. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High volume disruptions for a recently married celebrity. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined for now. I've warned the main source of the disruption. If it continues, they can be blocked. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Editor (Bearcat) repeatedly deletes page. LJA123 (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done: Unclear what you mean. I can't see anything in your deleted contributions that suggests that Bearcat has been doing so, and they haven't edited that page. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I just requested unprotection and apologized to Bearcat. It was my fault--I completely forgot to put in the tags. Thanks LJA123 (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism, full page data removed few days back due to vandalism. SocialTheVpm (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not sure which data you're referring to, but the last edits before you were in November. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Also constant violations of MOS:GENDERID. SoWhy 19:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive and unsourced changes to BLP by multiple IP editors. Schazjmd (talk) 20:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:11, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Drmies. GoodnightmushTalk 21:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I have some sources for more edits as the current information about the topic "OpIndia" lacks transparency and have one-sided view point. It should be neutral. It must be neutral. I've some proves for this topics as I've conducted a research about the topic "OpIndia" for a long time.
So, I'm requesting for making it unprotected so that I can edit with more proves. Yamdooot (talk) 18:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. You can use the talk page to suggest and discuss potential changes.Ponyobons mots 18:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
08 February 2023
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Widow99 (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Permanent IP vandalism on date of birth Match2015 (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Block Evasion VVikingTalkEdits 19:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 22:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Partofthemachine (talk) 18:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 22:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been repeatedly subject to erroneous edits which take away the value of having fact based Wikipedia pages which reflect information with biographical significance. Welovepapayas (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GoodnightmushTalk 21:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Magitroopa (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Same reason as Lil Siya. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely to match the extended confirmed create protection at Lil Siya. Kinu t/c 00:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced information. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 22:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalisms Riktetta (talk) 17:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by IPs/new users since at least December. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Many vandalism and unsorced changes in the last weeks, the recent history is full of that--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 22:11, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: disruptive edits have resumed after 1yr protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 03:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not for two days. Daniel Case (talk) 22:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP repeatedly reinserting dubiously sourced material on controversial Serbian film. Partial protection requested. Pincrete (talk) 11:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Clearly contentious, but I'm not seeing much disruption from IPs. Daniel Case (talk) 22:49, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 3 months. Adnan (talk) 13:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Vandalism, due to the high severity of the disaster, should be PC-Pro'd until It is stable. ElusiveTaker (talk) 14:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Err, I guess we both had the same idea. So which one do you prefer, since there could be useful additions from IPs on this one. ElusiveTaker (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Merged from duplicate request. Would advise either declining or semi-protecting: pending-changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high edit rate. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I am honestly not seeing much evidence in the edit history that persistent addition of unsourced content by IPs is diverting editors from keeping pace with breaking news. Daniel Case (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Merged from duplicate request. Would advise either declining or semi-protecting: pending-changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high edit rate. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 14:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two edits, both reverted. Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting autoconfirmed edit protection of page "Wings of Fire (novel series)": moderately frequent anonymous edits and vandalism has occured over the years and it seems to be a target for destructive, relativistic and occasionally unencyclopedic behavior from users. May need to be extended protection. ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 17:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. About two or three edits in the last month, nothing that looks like it's taxing the regular editors on the page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I can't take it no more with editors coming here and harassing an admin and block evading on my talk page. Tails Wx 01:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. MelanieN (talk) 02:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 01:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. MelanieN (talk) 02:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotection: (Remove 'Pending Changes' reduce to 'Semi Protection') This page has been 'pending changes' protected since 2018 for 'Persistent Sockpuppetry.' I don't think this is a valid reason to have 'Pending changes' applied (it's not 'vandalism') and most pending changes reviewers won't be 'checkusers' anyway.
Protecting admin does not appear to be active. JeffUK 10:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- @JeffUK: Semi-protection is an escalation from CRASHlock, not a softening. And provided the article isn't otherwise contraindicated for it sockpuppetry is indeed a valid reason to use CRASHlock, as much as I loathe uttering that sentence. That most reviewers won't be CheckUsers is irrelevant; one doesn't necessarily need that tool to suss out if someone is a sock. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:38, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done. I'm not sure whether the sockpuppetry is still an issue, but regardless there seems to be a good case here for pending changes protection: there's been plenty of recent disruption, but it's not so concentrated that PCP would be ineffective. There have also been a number of constructive IP edits (e.g. [9][10][11][12]) that semi-protection would have prevented. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism all day, including multiple ips and accounts in the last hour Very Average Editor (talk) 05:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 09:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The revision history of this article is just walls of "reverted" or "undid edits" done by IPs. Surprised that this article isn't protected even though it was a shockingly recent addition to the English Wikipedia. Crusader1096 (message) 06:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (talk) 09:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Sahaib (talk) 07:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 09:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 04:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This is about a single number afaict...get it to the talk-page, evaluate the numbers please, and find consensus. Protection won#t solve this. Lectonar (talk) 08:38, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism and disruption since protection expired, being an article about an American state makes the page very vulnerable to vandalism. TylerBurden (talk) 08:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. As far as State articles go, this is far from being heavy disruption. The vandalism account has been blocked, the rest seems manageable. At need we can pending-changes protect. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism Tusk001 (talk) 11:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute over the controversy section of the article. I think both parties should have a discussion on the talk page over which particular part of the section do they want to keep or remove but as of now, One party wants to remove the entire controversy section while the other one wants to restore all of it. The constant edit warring is preventing any healthy discussion. The last stable version of the article had the controversy section in it. Razer(talk) 08:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- As the admin who put this article under ECP a few days ago, I understand why this would be sought. The problem is that once the full-protection expires, it would be necessary to manually restore the ECP. So if we do this, someone needs to commit to getting it back either by notifying me or making a fresh request here. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Things have slightly improved since my request for protection and there have been a couple of editors who are trying to improve the article. I think ECP is sufficient under the current circumstances. Interestingly the same story is being repeated on the article of another pakistani general - Asim Saleem Bajwa. Where a group of editors have been trying to remove the entire controversy section. Razer(talk) 08:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor I have upgraded protection to EC for Asim Saleem Bajwa, though. Lectonar (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Things have slightly improved since my request for protection and there have been a couple of editors who are trying to improve the article. I think ECP is sufficient under the current circumstances. Interestingly the same story is being repeated on the article of another pakistani general - Asim Saleem Bajwa. Where a group of editors have been trying to remove the entire controversy section. Razer(talk) 08:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 04:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. There doesn't seem to be enough activity right now to warrant protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, likely due to giving the response to the State of the Union. Kornatice (talk) 04:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Lectonar: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... It was protected for 6 hours, which have come and gone. Favonian (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, WP:BLP violations by IP editors White 720 (talk) 04:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lemonaka (talk) 04:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism resuming immediately after protection expired. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:40, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by User:Brianmagallano IP sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 01:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Although the article is pending-changes-protected, there's still a high rate of IP edits coming, nearly all of their changes get reverted, and they're not stopping. This is wasting the time of pending changes reviewers. Wes sideman (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
+1 Reason: The page has been suffering high levels of IP Vandalism and fan edits, I requested it few days back too and requesting again. Wiki Master World (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- 2023 visit by Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This page should be extended-confirmed protected as it is part of a series of articles about the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Compusolus (talk) 10:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now. A single user, so protection isn't really the right recourse. Also, no edits from them since being warned today (i.e. horse, cart, etc.). El_C 13:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Protected due to a long-inactive sockpuppeteer. Partofthemachine (talk) 02:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging Anachronist as the protecting administrator. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected —ScottyWong— 16:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — DVRTed (Talk) 15:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism Tbf69 userpage • talkpage 16:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection or extended confirmed protection: There's been a lot of unsourced information added into the article, done mostly by IPs. Edwordo13 (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OK, it has become more persistent than last time I remember this request being made. Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent joke sections and joke edit requests ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Subject of much transfer speculation though no official announcement has been given. Most edits recently are by IPs changing his team without an official source. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 18:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for 10 days. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: Long-term abuse. 80.181.185.67 (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Current semi-protection appears up to the task. Favonian (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skipple ☎ 18:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of valid tag. Onel5969 TT me 19:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
09 February 2023
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sakiv (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2A01:C22:D5FB:500:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Support Came here to make the same request. Persistent IP vandalism and disruptions on one of the top viewed current disasters. Ecrusized (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- I said yesterday that it didn't seem like disruptive edits were overwhelming the edit history. Today they were, so we blocked the user's range for a week. Let's see how it goes from here. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism –lomrjyotalk 22:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ponyobons mots 00:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Hello, I want the article Cris mj to have Wikipedia office protection so that it is not edited by false information editions Saaaaaaam7 (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- That's not how this works. First, the protection level you speak of is only able to be added by a member of the WMF. Second, the article doesn't exist. Third, WP:OWN, you can't control who does and doesn't edit the article. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined —ScottyWong— 00:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Odinaka1 (talk) 22:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined. This article needs help, but semi-protection wouldn't help it. The problem is nationalistic/POV editing by multiple auto-confirmed editors, who change the article to their version of the truth about this person. You, Odinaka1, are part of the problem; your additions are unsourced and non-neutral. But so are other people's additions. I wonder if there is someone at Wikipedia who is informed enough about this part of the world to sort it out? Anyone? MelanieN (talk) 00:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recently traded to a new team, lots of premature edits stating he has been traded when it hasn't been officially announced yet. WP:SPORTSTRANS. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 02:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: repeated vandalism from multiple IPs, including 3 different IPs in the past 24 hours; Jamie7687 (talk) 01:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption involving change of nationality against consensus. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 04:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 06:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Perennial target for vandalism and sockpuppeteers. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 06:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism after prior protection expired, being one of the most high profile football players in the world makes the article highly vulnerable to vandalism. TylerBurden (talk) 03:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 06:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spamming. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 06:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. It is not just about the sourcing/content dispute issue which was why my request was previously rejected, but please, just see the recent IPs edits in the article. Xexerss (talk) 00:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. oncamera (talk page) 00:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —ScottyWong— 06:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Too much IPs putting unnecessary detail. CastJared (talk) 01:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —ScottyWong— 06:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It appears a new podcast provided by BBC has "cast doubt" (unspecified) upon previous documentation of Mary Mallon's birthsite. A series of IPs (possibly the same person) seem determined to extirpate mentions of her origin. I'd like a few weeks for this podcast to age out. Tarl N. (discuss) 06:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. On a side note, podcasts can be reliable sources just like any other media if they are produced by a reliable source (after all, WP:NEWSORG contains no limitation that only text should be considered reliable). Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by SoWhy (talk • contribs) 10:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Some users (possibly meatpuppetry) are continously trying to whitewash his biography by removing referenced information and adding promotional content. Please increase it protection as this oligarch has been supporter of Russia as a party member and, therefore, comes under Russia-Ukraine arbcom enforcement. 188.163.34.202 (talk) 09:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. WP:GS/RUSUKR is not an Arbcom Enforcement area but community-enacted general sanctions but I fail to see how this article fits even under a broadly construed ban. If you disagree, WP:ANI is the venue to request community GS enforcement. SoWhy 10:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Large volume of unconstructive edits from IP editors over the past several days, largely in relation to recent comic about Turkish earthquakes. ArcticSeeress (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 10:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. has been semi-protected. EC-protection not necessary. Lectonar (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive edits from a sock puppet who is evading blocks by creating new accounts and will not stop no matter how many times they are warned and blocked. Bowling is life (talk) 15:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: involved in reports of a trade that is not official yet, and people editing the page as if the trade is official. HappyBoi3892 (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: involved in reports of a trade that is not official yet, and people editing the page as if the trade is official. HappyBoi3892 (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of content that, per a recent RfC, should be excluded from the article. Woodroar (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not enough disruption for protection. @Woodroar: an editnotice could do the trick, though. Lectonar (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: involved in reports of a trade that is not official yet, and people editing the page as if the trade is official. HappyBoi3892 (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: involved in reports of a trade that is not official yet, and people editing the page as if the trade is official. HappyBoi3892 (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi Protection Persistent vandalism. Ecrusized (talk) 14:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I see plenty of editing activity, but the vandalism isn't overwhelming the page anymore after a very active disruptive IP-range was blocked. Disruption is manageable now, and many edits by unconfirmed and IP editors aren't vandalism. They might sometimes not be helpful, but often they are.... Lectonar (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Draft:Interstate and U.S. Highways with Interstate 80 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked 2601:244:4081:500:0:0:0:0/64. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive edits from a sock puppet who is evading blocks by creating new accounts and will not stop no matter how many times they are warned and blocked. Bowling is life (talk) 14:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. --Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP re-adding example list and bloat to article. Has also occurred several times in the past. Loopy30 (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I see recent disruption from a single IP who hasn't been warned yet. Protection is not appropriate for such situations. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Seems to be a target of House of Yahweh ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR. Disruptive editing on page IPs; general ECP sanctions are authorized as a remedy to enforce ECP-only restrictions. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from LTAs-see history. Tails Wx 19:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Reportedly traded but not confirmed, anonymous IPs keep editing despite no info being confirmed. The Kip (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent abuse by IP editors. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 20:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
10 February 2023
Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 13:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. If protected at all, this would need full protection, but it seems a bit early for that. Lectonar (talk) 13:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Triggerhippie (talk · contribs). also Tezak habra 2, by me, after it was reported to ANEW Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi protection: Persistent edit warring by IP after many attempts to compromise. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 72.86.128.0/20 (talk · contribs). for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Recently many people have been changing the country of origin from 'The United States of America' to 'The United States of Alex Kister' and has been pretty annoying to revert. I don't want heavy protection, just a small amount temporaily, thanks. Candeadly (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism Msgctl (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I ask for this article protection to prevent them from subsequently putting false information about the singer Saaaaaaam7 (talk) 21:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Given this and this, if you intend to contribute constructively here, I suggest you start doing that. --Kinu t/c 21:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An essay that is, for some reason, getting more than the usual amount of disruptive edits. Barely anything has changed in the past 50 edits. ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 23:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR. Only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area... The restriction applies to all edits and pages related to the topic area, broadly construed
, with exceptions allowing non-ECP editors to chat on talk pages.
There's an IP currently trying to edit-war information on where the bullet entered this person's head out of the article, and ECP should be enforced to require them to engage in talk page discussion rather than edit warring (and to prevent future disruption). — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A brief burst in the last couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I just came here to request the same, as an IP continue to disrupt against/ignoring talk page consensus, including after it was declined. Requesting that you reconsider @Daniel Case CT55555(talk) 22:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- That editor is at the brink of 3RR and has been warned. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- They reverted 4 times already actually. Thanks for giving them a warning. CT55555(talk) 22:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- That editor is at the brink of 3RR and has been warned. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I just came here to request the same, as an IP continue to disrupt against/ignoring talk page consensus, including after it was declined. Requesting that you reconsider @Daniel Case CT55555(talk) 22:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotection: Please make the page so it is not fully move-protected; I need to move the page to carry out an RM I recently closed here. Since this was fully move-protected a decade ago, such protection is also likely unnecessary at this point. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reduced to ECP move protection. Probably could have just reduced to semi—there's not actually a clear reason in the log why this was move-FPP'd—but erring on the side of caution given the topic area. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 22:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Marking as
Unprotected for the bot. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Marking as
Unprotect. This page, under the title List of recently extinct bird species, was put under pending changes protection by Ronhjones in September 2018 because of waves of edits from socks. Over the past several weeks, an anonymous editor using a dynamic IP has made hundreds of miniscule edits, all of which have been accepted practically immediately by pending changes reviewers because this person's tweaks have all been clear improvements. Protection is now doing more harm than good. CityOfSilver 04:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Revwescol. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting protection for this again because IP vandalisms and disruptions are long lasting. Just spotted this edit [13] which significantly reduced casualties without explanation, the edit remained for nearly 2 hours. Ecrusized (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a very heavily edited article. There really isn't a whole lot of IP vandalism or misinformation, but what I saw was inappropriate enough to call for protection. (What is the matter with people, that they think it is cute to vandalize an article about an event that killed 20,000 people??) MelanieN (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism of BLP by IPs, uncited content etc. CT55555(talk) 22:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The problem edits are persistent, since at least December, but not frequent enough to qualify for regular protection. MelanieN (talk) 06:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding unsourced and vandalism edits since Feb 1, 2023. Cassiopeia talk 23:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: In the month of February, disruptive editing and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP sockpuppetry. DanielRigal (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Clearly not vandalism. The edits in question only removed unnecessary and highly subjective phrasing, and better organized things, so that the trial is covered before its aftermath. 79.60.232.33 (talk) 02:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above IP is identified as a proxy via proxy checker. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- That doesn't affect the content of the edits. 79.60.232.33 (talk) 02:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- That sounds familiar! ;) Drmies (talk) 03:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- That doesn't affect the content of the edits. 79.60.232.33 (talk) 02:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above IP is identified as a proxy via proxy checker. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semiprotection. For as long as this article has existed, every single time it's not under protection, legions of new editors with conflicts of interest appear to remove the contentious (but reliably sourced and entirely accurate) term "multi-level marketing." DMacks has had to waste time protecting this page over and over for the exact same reason for just about a decade now. CityOfSilver 03:46, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism. Has been protected in the past for up to 1 year. Indef protection would be nice? The nature of the topic being "no rules" "anarchy" (like 4chan as a metaphor) will constantly draw vadnals. Leijurv (talk) 03:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent POV-pushing and disruptive editing. This page is also within the scope of WP:CT/IPA. Partofthemachine (talk) 07:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and persistent disruptive editing. MrloniBoo (talk) 07:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent attempts, mostly from IP addresses, to add leader name and similar. Chumpih t 08:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC) DatGuyTalkContribs 08:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various IP users over the last few days; ranging from changing an episode's production code for no reason, to adding an episode not listed in reliable sources. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2603:3016:830:8100:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring by IP user. BilCat (talk) 03:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 97.119.182.51 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:38, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Looking at the history of the page, there's been an edit war going on for 1.5 YEARS now. It started on 5 September 2021 with user Smitterdin adding the claim that canon is decided by the fan base, and he has been hounding that page ever since, undoing everyone's work who corrected this. Originally he did so without any source, and later on he just copied a random source from further down the page. Ironically the source doesn't support his claim, it contradicts it, defining canon as "The source material". It does note that not all people accept the concept, but that's a far cry from it supporting the claim that canon is decided by the fan base. Side notes about the opinion of some people have no place on wikipedia, lest we have to add to the Earth's page that some believe it to be flat! 1.5 years of edit wars is too long and he clearly has no intention of stopping. Therefore I request that his unsupported claims be removed and the page temporarily locked, as a sign for him to stop his vandalism 2A02:1810:4F0B:500:7791:C6EF:E1E4:5282 (talk) 04:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm the user mentioned in this request so I decided to address it.
- 1) The claim that there is an ongoing edit war that lasted 1.5 years is blown out of proportion. This page was edited 68 times in the last 1.5 years and only a portion of those is edit warring.
- 2) The claim that I fought against multiple users is false. The edit war 1.5 years ago was conducted by me and an anonymous user who later made an account to post on the talk page. Multiple users agreed with me and there were at least two other accounts (not including bots) who reverted edits on that page.
- 3) The claim that I committed vandalism is false. I corrected this article in good faith and then I attempted to discuss my corrections on the talk page. The edit war 1.5 years ago happened because the anonymous user involved ignored my requests to take it to the talk page and instead proceeded to re-add the same information over and over again and use edit summaries for talking. I acted the way I did believing I was fighting vandalism which is permitted according to Wikipedia:Edit warring.
- 4) The argument at hand is incomparable to the flat earth argument and only serves to portray the opposing side as incompetent. Smitterdin (talk) 05:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- 1) the fact that it's not always been the same intensity is irrelevant. I can see in the history page that it's been going on for 1.5 years
- 2) Multiple users agreeing with you doesn't matter if you can't provide a source to back up your claims. if multiple people agree that "the earth is flat" should be added on the Earth's page, it doesn't matter either because there are no sources to back up that claim. Wikipedia is about facts and not about "x number of people have opinion Y"
- 3) If you work in good faith, then why did you at first not even use a source and later just copied a source which outright contradicts your claim? The source clearly defines canon as "The source material." notice the full stop there! The added note that some people refuse to work with that is not part of the definition of canon, it's a side note
- 4) The comparison with flat earth is an analogy to highlight the absurdity of what you're doing, i.e. using the side note "some people have different opinions" as proof that your claim is right, even though the source directly contradicts you. Just like with the shape of the earth, it doesn't matter if some people have a divergent opinion, this is true for any topic ever
- (also, I don't think this page is the correct place for a discussion) 2A02:1810:4F0B:500:7791:C6EF:E1E4:5282 (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Protection would only disservice non-confirmed constructive editors. Possible recourse for this would be partial blocks, but seeing the discussions on the talk page:
Declined. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Poor redirect overwrites resumed immediately after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined - I'd rather wait for more than one edit to see if this is a return of the pattern (which is likely, but not sure) or a one-off. No prejudice against rerequesting if/when it does occur. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Long-term abuse. 98.238.181.146 (talk) 08:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Platapuspie (talk · contribs) blocked by Firefly. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of ip vandalism, I also need someone to help restore previous edit since the ip removed a large sum of reliable sources, placing red tags on the page Theonewithreason (talk) 08:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. DatGuyTalkContribs 08:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism; I suggest maybe indef semi. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 00:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism. Kvdkvkvifv (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
I need the page WP:FUCK to be extended protected
Declined - despite your claim to the contrary, there's been no recent vandalism at all, and only ten edits over the past 14 years. See here. The existing protection is plenty sufficient. Frankly, I'm not sure why you are making this request. --Yamla (talk) 12:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 12:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism - IPs keep changing to "twelfth season" for new show despite being warned. To a lesser extent, this is also occurring on Frasier as well. Requesting longer page protection for the upcoming series and maybe a shorter one on the main Frasier article as well? SitcomyFan (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism - IPs keep changing information about revival, info in infobox, for upcoming second series. Also requested protection for that above. SitcomyFan (talk) 09:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Going back to semi-protection seems reasonable now that his trade to the Suns was officialized. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 01:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging Bagumba as the protecting administrator. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Already unprotected by administrator Bagumba. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Extraordinary Writ: One or more pages in this request have not been unprotected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, make that
Already protected., then. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Make it
Requesting immediate archiving...
DatGuyTalkContribs 17:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
11 February 2023
Semi-protection: IP/New account disruption. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current and ongoing rash of vandalism from IP addresses. Geoff | Who, me? 13:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked 2A0C:5A81:E200:0:0:0:0:0/39 for WP:GWAR across multiple articles. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism resumed immediately when previous block expired. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That was just one edit in the day since it expired. If it will need to be reprotected, it's too early to tell. Daniel Case (talk) 22:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent editors removing lead summary material of sourced content and no discussion on talk. Andre🚐 23:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a lot of page blanking and/or hoaxing on the page. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Tamzin. Now under pending-changes protection for two weeks. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Disruption resumed following expiration of last protection. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 03:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP accounts. Edl-irishboy (talk) 19:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP on 10 February and another the day before. Seems manageable at the moment. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent inclusion of unsourced material HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 156.57.45.112 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Full protection for a while: The vandalism campaign has resumed after a few years of dormancy. 2A06:C701:772F:9700:39E8:9120:B5C4:9FFA (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined. Two accounts in the last day or so. Before that, one account 20 days ago. It's already extended-confirmed protected indefinitely; this is a manageable level of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Editors/IPs reporting he is dead. I did do a Google search but did not find anything to support it. S0091 (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined, as the reports are now sourced. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Hello!
Good day!
Some user whose account has been closed in Freelancer.com due violations against its Terms and Conditions and Code of conduct, is constantly vandalizing Matt Barrie's page.
We request a page protection for Matt Barrie's page.
Thanks FL2023 (talk) 14:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- User: 2800:4b0:840d:e938:5101:38d5:d9dd:63da
- Edit Dates:
- 05:41, 10 February 2023
- 05:39, 10 February 2023
- 04:57, 10 February 2023
- 04:27, 10 February 2023 FL2023 (talk) 14:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism Derknasnort (talk) 07:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please protect this page from consistent disruptive edits by some IPs. A Cricket Premi (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:51, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Was suprised to see an ip can edit this highly visible template doc page. I suggest we have the same protection as the actual template page. Moxy- 04:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Template protected indefinitely. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:13, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Moxy and Ohnoitsjamie: I don't believe that protection is necessary for a template documentation page, and even if it were necessary, the template-editor level is far too high. The point of protecting high-risk templates is due to the havoc they can cause because they are transcluded in so many places. This documentation page is transcluded in two places: a sandbox and its parent template. Knock-on effects of disruptive editing for a documentation page are nearly zero. {{Infobox country}} is transcluded 6,000+ times; if you compare it to an incredibly high-risk template like {{Short description}} (5,000,000+ times), its documentation page isn't protected. Nor is the similar {{Infobox}}'s documentation page (3,000,000+ transclusions). Please unprotect it. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps I've asked for too high a level of protection... willing to except any increase in protection. looking at the history of the info box documentation page it should also be semi or whatever protected. Moxy-
04:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't view that as necessary, given that in 2022 it was disrupted by only two accounts/IPs: one in April and another in October. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've removed the protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't view that as necessary, given that in 2022 it was disrupted by only two accounts/IPs: one in April and another in October. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps I've asked for too high a level of protection... willing to except any increase in protection. looking at the history of the info box documentation page it should also be semi or whatever protected. Moxy-
- @Moxy and Ohnoitsjamie: I don't believe that protection is necessary for a template documentation page, and even if it were necessary, the template-editor level is far too high. The point of protecting high-risk templates is due to the havoc they can cause because they are transcluded in so many places. This documentation page is transcluded in two places: a sandbox and its parent template. Knock-on effects of disruptive editing for a documentation page are nearly zero. {{Infobox country}} is transcluded 6,000+ times; if you compare it to an incredibly high-risk template like {{Short description}} (5,000,000+ times), its documentation page isn't protected. Nor is the similar {{Infobox}}'s documentation page (3,000,000+ transclusions). Please unprotect it. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ohnoitsjamie: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Bot, your confusion is understandable. Favonian (talk) 10:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring and vandalism 192.42.89.171 (talk) 06:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine (talk) 07:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... OK, it's create (not fully) protected, but that was both requested and appropriate. Favonian (talk) 10:51, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs making similar vandalism edits today. ÷seresin 17:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 10:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing/Socking going back to June 15th of last year. Magherbin (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:27, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hardyplants (talk) 05:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 11:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 2A02:14F:0:2B33:193B:AFA0:5D0F:32B1 (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I believe all of the accounts have been blocked. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Long-term full protection is too desperate a measure. We'll have to do the whac-a-mole, deriving some satisfaction from the amount of effort wasted by the creep. Favonian (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/95.24.203.238. Binksternet (talk) 07:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This redirect was protected in 2008 and needs updating. Lack of disruption on similar redirects indicates protection is no longer necessary. Peter James (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Are you sure that protection isn't the reason for the lack of disruption? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Peter James: How do you plan to update this redirect? —ScottyWong— 16:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Changed the redirect to an existing section. If the purpose of the request was the creation of an article, a draft should be submitted to WP:AFC. Favonian (talk) 11:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The issue was my fault. LJA123 (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- That page doesn't appear to be protected. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor – at least that's how I read it. Favonian (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Editorkamran (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 15:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Influx of IPs making changes to nationality, last protection expired a month ago. Mellk (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Downgrade from full protection to indefinite extended confirmed protection. Look, I get this always will be an obvious vandalism target (I assume you know why) but I think we can take it down a notch (no pun intended). Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 09:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Is there any legitimate, foreseeable reason for the protection on this redirect to be downgraded? "Because it's been protected for so long" isn't as convincing an argument on a redirect. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Is there any extended confirmed disruptive editing in the page history? I don't see any but perhaps I'm missing something. I believe best practice is to use the minimum amount of protection needed. –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- The page was full protected after Imadethisforherobrine began to edit it, but that editor is nowhere near ECP, so ECP would have prevented their disruption. I don't see why full protection was warranted at the time; it seems more likely a misclick more than anything else. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Is there any extended confirmed disruptive editing in the page history? I don't see any but perhaps I'm missing something. I believe best practice is to use the minimum amount of protection needed. –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging Ohnoitsjamie as the protecting administrator. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected with no counterargument having been presented. Favonian (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by various IPs over the past week. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent block evasion/LTA target since around October 2018. Magitroopa (talk) 18:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor (multiple IPs) continues to restore contested infobox trivialities without engaging in any discussion on the talk page or even via edit summaries. The user is edit warring with multiple editors, and distrupting the article. — TAnthonyTalk 19:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent influx of IPs edit warring over nationality, probably social-media related. Mellk (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oh look, we agree. I submitted a request a few minutes after this one; appending my rationale for completeness: Reason: An issue regarding the lead has been under continuous discussion since October 2022, but is subject to constant edit warring with impunity at the same time, while the discussion is ignored. The article is in WP:CTOPICS as part of Eastern European history, and recent events have also connected it to WP:GS/RUSUKR. Perhaps a low level of protection will help. —Michael Z. 19:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Sock disruption since July 26th of last year Magherbin (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Highly active sock on page since January 6th. Magherbin (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – the majority of edits made this year have been reverted. Partofthemachine (talk) 01:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by a user and several IPs since 6 February. The article had been semi-protected for a period of one week between 18 and 25 September 2022. Phikia (talk) 02:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR RowanJ LP (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring wrt article subject's pronouns. –RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 04:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent drive-by SPA IP's making POV edits. Slatersteven (talk) 16:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nswix (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last such edit was over a day ago. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption seems to have stopped over a day ago. Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Sporadic IP vandalism. They've been removing some legit content on it. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As you said, "sporadic". Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hardyplants (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits at all in two days. Daniel Case (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent Vandalism on Maria Branyas and Fusa Tatsumi's article. Simonthings18 (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not done for Fusa Tatsumi as there is not enough problem editing to warrant protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
12 February 2023
Reason: Repeated addition of misinformation Vidpro23 (talk) 13:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hoppers (likely blocked editors) trying to change sourced content. LouisAragon (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:58, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pretty consistent stream of vandalism over the last week. Nswix (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – addition of hoaxes continues after page protection. wizzito | say hello! 20:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism and edit warring resumed near immediately after last protection wore off - which was yesterday, by the way. dannymusiceditor oops 21:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has needed protection repeatedly over the last few years. It is almost ready for indefinite protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protect: Due to persistent disruption for the past couple weeks by fly-by ip users adding unsourced content. Thank you - wolf 22:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Ongoing IP vandalism spam, likely to be subject to more Prinsgezinde (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: Page has been semi-protected but two new accounts have already spammed it since then. Same at main article Hogwarts Legacy. Prinsgezinde (talk) 23:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yes, I see the problem: The socks are autoconfirmed. This should help. If vandalism resumes after the 4 days, request again or alert an administrator. I also gave the article itself extended confirmed protection, for a month. MelanieN (talk) 01:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Recently created article, in a contentious topic area, that is currently seeing a moderate level of disruption from IP editors. Like similar articles in this content area, this probably needs long term semi protection. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Feels a bit weird to do this myself but.
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Semi-protected for 7 days. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism, intensified after the organization tweeted about it and supporters made calls to mass vandalize the page TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Semi-protected for 7 days. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: A series of IPs, some of whom seem to have an unusual level of Wiki-knowledge, are repeatedly making essentially the same edits concerning a controversial Serbian film to defend/mirror press releases from the filmmaker as the only coverage. Temp partial protection would help by making all editors responsible for their edits. Pincrete (talk) 16:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 07:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A series of sockpuppets and IPs are edit-warring at this article, representing block evasion by User:Mr. Punk Pirate. Binksternet (talk) 22:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. —ScottyWong— 07:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 00:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 07:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semiprotection. Disruptive editing and personal attacks. An IP hopper has been trying to add a bad edit and in a characteristically incoherent edit summary told me "logic is something you dont have and all wmf editors". CityOfSilver 03:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal magnet. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected indefinitely. Given that this is the talk page of an LTA, no reason not to. Kinu t/c 05:18, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I'm confident that banned edit-warrior Ytpks896 (talk · contribs) is behind the IP 103.141.159.225. Same edit-warring, same Pakistani nationalist editing on same article, same refusal to accept anything that goes against him, and same refusal to discuss anything. 39.41.6.68 (talk) 06:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Misleading the actual dispute is this Afghan nationalist hijacked a border crossing page[14] converted it to a Afghan town[15] instead of creating a new article. I already started discussion at Talk:Torkham 103.141.159.225 (talk) 06:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Not misleading. The above IP (a.k.a. Ytpks896 (talk · contribs)) wants Torkham, a famous border town in Afghanistan, to become an article about a Pakistani door, where people enter Torkham, Pakistan (a small town). I say he should create a new article about Torkham Gate, Torkham Door, or Torkham border crossing, and leave the Torkham article alone, which is about a famous Afghan town.--39.41.6.68 (talk) 07:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Instead of allegions article hijacking and unsorce claims why doesn't you login with your account and come here to talk or creating a new article for Afghan town. you are looks like an experienced user must be an investigation launched against you. 103.141.159.225 (talk) 07:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —ScottyWong— 07:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
IP socks
- Rathod (surname) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Vijanones (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Vala clan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Vala clan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Ghorasar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Kadam (clan) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Chavan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Makwana (clan) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jesar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent socking – Extensive targetting by sock IPs (see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala), articles are also covered under WP:CASTE sanctions. Gotitbro (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —ScottyWong— 07:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced information. Campaigning on social media[16] 199.7.157.74 (talk) 23:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent WP:LINKSPAM by changing official sitelink to some other YouTube downloader site, by 3 different Morrocan IPs. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalisms Riktetta (talk) 09:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 09:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Previous protection lapsed. Page immediately subject to new IP vandalism. MrEarlGray (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
13 February 2023
Requesting semiprotection IP vandalism since creation a week ago — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 04:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two such edits in last 24 hours. The mere existence of vandalism does not justify protection, otherwise we'd be the Portuguese Wikipedia and allow only registered accounts to edit. Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lapadite (talk) 07:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A brief outburst yesterday, and one a week or so before that. Daniel Case (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism SaltyW (talk) 08:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. While it is recurrent, it seems to happen only once a week or so and is easily dealt with through usual editorial methods. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Mobile editor(s) keeps vandalising 'ownership' name of the Hurricanes GoodDay (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is "pending changes" protected, but in recent days there's a steady stream of IP and new account edits and none of them are accepted - just seems silly to not have semi-protection on, none of the IP edits are helpful. Fred Zepelin (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by user first blocked, then created a sock, and now using IPs to keep disrupting the article. Jeppiz (talk) 14:30, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2A00:23C6:191A:A901:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). 1 week. I hadn’t seen this rfpp, and have no objection to lengthening this IPv6/64 for a longer time. DMacks (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Mobile editor vandalising 'ownership' section of page. Indeed IPs & Mobile editors have been making such vandalism, to NHL team pages, for well over a year or more. GoodDay (talk) 16:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. 2607:FEA8:E99F:B0E0:0:0:0:0/64 is in the penalty box. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated substitution by IP users of terms in short description and first sentence that violate MOS:TERRORIST and are less accurate ("murderer" for a getaway driver convicted of "felony murder," as lede paragraph accurate explains). Changes have been reverted previously with request (ignored) to take dispute to the talk page. PDGPA (talk) 19:50, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see three instances of vandalism so far this year. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal has resumed making edits. Geoff | Who, me? 20:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked recent /64 range; not much recent activity beyond that. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing from IPs RowanJ LP (talk) 21:30, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, very controversial figure. Added content often-times has a communal spin. C1MM (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined There have been NO edits to this article since December 2022. Do not file these kinds of reports. Bbb23 (talk) 00:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR, as it states, "A community discussion at the administrators' noticeboard/incidents has placed all pages with content related to the Russo-Ukrainian War, broadly construed, under indefinite general sanctions", so this article needs to be placed under protection. RowanJ LP (talk) 17:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism of this page has been mentioned on a popular Twitter account, inspiring some imitators. Spike 'em (talk) 19:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Endless string of false/unsourced figures Arjayay (talk) 19:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Six months' semi-protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent Super Bowl losers. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Referee for the latest Super Bowl. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Two days' semi-protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs trying to remove or whitewash the 2020 capital attack and other attempts to destabilize the US federal government since. Dronebogus (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 18:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits resumed immediately after the last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The apostrophe is not a letter. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. RPSkokie (talk) 06:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting extended autoconfirmed protection of page "Wings of Fire (novel series)": there seems to be consensus per the article's talk page that the article is likely a long-term sockfarm/fancruft target. Additionally, banned user CC8200's talk page issues a threat to anonymously vandalize this and other pages (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CC8200) - one which is possibly being carried out at the moment considering a recent page vandalism. The page has inconsistently been threatened over the years, yet a protective precaution could stop countless problems. ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 19:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. All that may be, but disruption to date isn't heavy enough to warrant any kind of protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems like anons have been quick to WP:GRAVEDANCE on this talk page. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:33, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —twotwofourtysix(talk || edits) 08:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The state of Minnesota should be protected for protection against vandalism. Corndogst (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DatGuy (talk • contribs) 16:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: not extended confirmed account edit war - restriction is imposed on edits and pages related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland, not extended confirmed accounts can not edit that page. GizzyCatBella🍁 13:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- STRONG OPPOSE stop edit warring trying to remove sourced information from the article. Thanks, -Springfield 4ever (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry - You need to have extended confirmed account to edit pages related to the Holocaust in Poland see this - GizzyCatBella🍁 13:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Again, please stop gaming the system. -Springfield 4ever (talk) 13:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- We have rules that all need to follow, sorry. - GizzyCatBella🍁 13:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is false. Wp:Ignore all rules when improving Wikipedia. -Springfield 4ever (talk) 13:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think you’re confusing rules with restrictions - GizzyCatBella🍁 13:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- You told rules, and I am in fact improving Wikipedia. -Springfield 4ever (talk) 13:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think you’re confusing rules with restrictions - GizzyCatBella🍁 13:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is false. Wp:Ignore all rules when improving Wikipedia. -Springfield 4ever (talk) 13:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- We have rules that all need to follow, sorry. - GizzyCatBella🍁 13:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Again, please stop gaming the system. -Springfield 4ever (talk) 13:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Never mind - the account has been temporarily restricted from editing that page. - GizzyCatBella🍁 14:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by requestor Lectonar (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption resumed immediately after the last protection ended. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Hopefully it looks like the IP editors has figured out what they need to do. I'll leave it open in case that changes with new edits. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hoping against odds. Favonian (talk) 17:33, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Lack of consensus on appropriate citations leading to edit war - if someone might at the same time provide an opinion that would be greatly appreciated Jguglielmin (talk) 09:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 15:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. So far this year, there have been thirteen disruptive edits from IP editors, and four more from registered users. Often the attackers change the religious denomination of Ja'far al-Sadiq, even though there is really no question in reliable academic sources about his Shia beliefs, e.g., the Iranica article here. These edits are often caught early and reverted by other editors. Had it not been for their efforts, it is likely that the article would have been damaged further by unsourced and tendentious edits. Albertatiran (talk) 10:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 15:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Ongoing disruption. ZH8000 (talk) 11:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Specifically, 49.15.128.0/17 has been blocked from editing the article for a month. Favonian (talk) 11:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:TE ongoing by IP addresses for the past few weeks. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 11:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 15:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to change cast list contradictory to available sources. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like the same user who just logged out and continued editing.
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. DatGuyTalkContribs 15:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. CastJared (talk) 13:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:55, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistant addition of non NPOV material that isn't backed up by claimed stated sources; relies on non WP:RS publications; or is simply invented. Persistant editing by unregistered users. Suspected sockpuppetry by unregistered user(s), likely linked to banned sockpuppet accounts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Saynotodrugs12 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rathfelder. Tonyinman (talk) 14:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by sock farm. Unbroken Chain (talk) 14:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- OPPOSE seriously the article about the city is titled Odesa. I was enforcing Wikipedia’s own rules. -Correct spelling of cities in Ukraine (talk) 14:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 15:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone using IPs is switching out the statistical leaders listed within the article to whomever had the highest average for the season. The Greek League, unlike most leagues, goes by total statistics accumulated for official leaders and not by the highest average. This explanation is written within the article. GPL93 (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked a /64 range. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism today by IP editors - possibly not over a long enough period, but I thought it worth putting the request to you. Tacyarg (talk) 15:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level protection to stopping User:SOURAVSHETTIGAR. Computer8738892 (talk) 15:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Footballer who came out as gay. Page is getting vandalized. RedPatch (talk) 15:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 16:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Doug Weller semi-protected this user talk page indefinitely in 2016. I'm not sure why indefinitely, but I would venture to guess the protection has ran its course. I asked the protecting administrator to unprotect, but they dismissed my request without explaining why the protection is still needed.
On a surface level, I would understand a temporary protection, but Gamaliel is an administrator, which means that their user talk page should normally be open for public editing. If the page is unprotected and Gamaliel is harassed by trolls or socks, any administrator – including Gamaliel – can of course apply a temporary semi-protection. Politrukki (talk) 14:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done I suggest asking at User talk:Gamaliel.--RegentsPark (comment) 14:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
14 February 2023
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Internet rumors are circulating about the death of Sin Boy, resisted at the Greek Wikipedia page. Binksternet (talk) 17:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and unsourced edits. Cassiopeia talk 22:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – frequent vandalism. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked a VOA and partial-blocked in static IP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is a target for misinformation. CivilianArthur (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 range blocked for 1 month. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:33, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is more than nine years old, it's a bit long don't you think? 176.128.237.169 (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- I suspect the reason for the indef prot is because this is a common student vandalism target (since the Black Death is usually a required history topic in grade school cirricula at some point). Note that every prot has been during the school year. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 17:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jéské Courian: Whatever reason it is, nine years is a bit too long for me. Could at least remove "death" in the section "complications" since it is not one properly speaking (on the contrary, the disease ends with death) – unless it's intended for black humor who knows. 176.128.237.169 (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected. I'm not convinced that disruption won't resume when the unprotection is discovered. In any case, I have removed "death" from the complications in the infobox. For further changes, please make edit requests on the talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Create protection - repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine (talk) 19:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be recent disruption on article about a possible move to Leeds United. However there are no sources for this. Maybe a weeks protection needed. Govvy (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. General Ization Talk 04:14, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A number of IPs on different ranges — but all appearing to be the same person — have been making "correct" changes without sources, or any evidence their changes are actually correct. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Anonymous users repeatedly adding future results (WP:CRYSTAL). Tropicalkitty (talk) 04:37, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. —ScottyWong— 06:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of a very persistent sockfarm (see history). ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 04:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 06:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 99% of the recent page history is IP edit warring, mostly related to the city's recent name change. O.N.R. (talk) 05:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 06:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by unregistered user(s) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and blocked the IPs. —ScottyWong— 06:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is a regular target for the IP sockpuppets of User:Belteshazzar. DanielRigal (talk) 22:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- What exactly are the problems with the edits? It is rather confusing to state that Corbett met Bates after consulting him, as the version you are restoring says. 79.60.232.33 (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- WP:EVADE your edits can be reverted because you have caused mass disruption. And yes you can consult someone and then meet them, that is what is normally done, you do not just randomly show up to meet doctors, you consult them first. You think you are being clever but are not. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- The source didn't actually say one way or the other, so I tried to edit the article to do the same, but was reverted again. 79.60.232.33 (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Of course it is going to be reverted! We do not have time to separate out which of your edits are vandalism and which are innocuous edits cynically designed to cover your tracks. We revert them all because we do not owe you our time or consideration. You need to go away. DanielRigal (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- None of my edits are vandalism. 79.60.232.33 (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Your presence here as a sockpuppet is an act of vandalism. How many sockpuppets have you had blocked now? Consider yourself de-facto banned! DanielRigal (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- None of my edits are vandalism. 79.60.232.33 (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Of course it is going to be reverted! We do not have time to separate out which of your edits are vandalism and which are innocuous edits cynically designed to cover your tracks. We revert them all because we do not owe you our time or consideration. You need to go away. DanielRigal (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- The source didn't actually say one way or the other, so I tried to edit the article to do the same, but was reverted again. 79.60.232.33 (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- WP:EVADE your edits can be reverted because you have caused mass disruption. And yes you can consult someone and then meet them, that is what is normally done, you do not just randomly show up to meet doctors, you consult them first. You think you are being clever but are not. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar where I am requesting a good long block for this IP. It seems to be some sort of proxy and Belteshazzar has used it multiple times. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. IP has been blocked for 2weeks. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 79.60.232.33 (talk · contribs) blocked by Blablubbs. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recent news emerged which seems like it could lead to a wave of vandalism. Most Horizontal Primate (talk) 02:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. And in any event this page hasn't been edited in three days. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of fake spam websites by IP editors. Yeeno (talk) 08:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by an IP who keeps restoring poorly sourced content. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @TenPoundHammer: Your revert edit summary is "unexplained addition of unsourced content", however the content actually has quite a few sources referenced. —ScottyWong— 06:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Over the past few days users have been continuously removing and re-adding sections to the wiki. Given that the sections to which were added included sources and reasoning for said sources were provided when requested, I am requesting that a protection be added to the page so that information to which is added isn't easily removed. I would also like to note that some of the users to which have removed certain elements of the wiki weren't able to provide much of a clear reason as to why they have chosen to remove said sections. AlmNack (talk) 10:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Having followed the exchange about this at ANI, protection is not the way to go here. You and the IP should follow the very sensible advice you have been given over there. Lectonar (talk) 11:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism after his holding call in Super Bowl LVII. Swagging (talk) 13:56, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 16:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Should probably be ECP'ed in accordance with convention with other articles related to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Compusolus (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —ScottyWong— 16:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The Wikipedia article on Zulfikar Ali Bhutto should have its protection increased due to the fact that most of the information has been done by IP users who have committed vandalism in the past and users with their own biased views. This is an important figure in Pakistan's history, and it is essential that accurate information be provided to readers. Increased protection will ensure this accuracy as well as prevent any further vandalism or bias from taking place. Starkex (talk) 15:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —ScottyWong— 16:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continuously poorly unsourced content addition by anonymous IPs. Yuugone (talk) 16:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we finally set perm semi, this is a vandal magnet, Perm semi is much easier than PC. I would go as far as ECP. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: NFL coach in the news regarding possibly being hired by a team. Disruptive unsourced changes are repeatedly being made. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:06, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Poet Tajkhan09 (talk) 14:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done – sockpuppetry, User:Khan tabrez. Favonian (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Talk page abuse. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 16:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Widr. Favonian (talk) 17:09, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:14, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Favonian (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. It seems the vandalism and disruption is frequent enough that a fixed expiration date will not stop it. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism RedPatch (talk) 19:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Favonian. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
জন্ম AbdulMustafa1 (talk) 16:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done – There's no such article on this Wikipedia, never has been and never will be. Your request rightly belongs at the Bengali Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 17:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent spam. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP persistently adding unsourced material (each one seems to get a partial IP block shortly afterward). 2pou (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated hi-jack attempts. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Page will always be targeted by link-spammers due to the nature of the topic. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:52, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring. Repeated removal / addition of the skin color of alleged perpetrator. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 21:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
15 February 2023
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism and disruptive (unsourced) edits by multiple IPs for the past 2 days. Schazjmd (talk) 20:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Endless nationalist disruptive editing. Partofthemachine (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruption and vandalism done by IPs. RowanJ LP (talk) 22:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Anonymous user(s) had been changing the track listing for a 14-year-old album without any provided sources. Googling their changes came up with nothing. Warned user about edits to the album's page but the edits continued until the page was protected. Now they've moved on to replacing the set list at To Party Arhizei with the fake track listing instead. I am requesting that page to now be protected as well. Grk1011 (talk) 20:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. RFPP isn't for issues with single users. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent changing of the link to a fake one. IPs do not seem to be deterred and I don't think the range is small enough to block ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protection for one month. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random name changing by fans who are upset about a recent change to the rankings. Nswix (talk) 23:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing comments about non Wikipedia topics violating WP:NOTAFORUM. IPs and new users continuing to report Facebook scams and attempting to contact the article's subject. Zinnober9 (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism. Rate of disruption is twice a month or less. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent sockpuppet vandalism. 120.29.69.70 (talk) 00:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption was last on 16 January. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last few days have had vandalism from multiple Brazilian IPs, both IPv4 and IPv6. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2804::/21 (talk · contribs). Partially, from that article and another. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by continiously adding unsourced content. Sricsi (talk) 00:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Ultimately, I view 76.184.86.109 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)'s contributions to be in good faith, not to mention verifiable. More effort needs to be made to communicate them beyond templated accusations of vandalism. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Wesoree (Talk) 02:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – More than a year of IP-hopping attempts to add the same unsourced PR-type content. Previous protections and current long-term block of user:104.224.116.194 not effective. Meters (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 07:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumed after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: According to the public log, there was an original three-month semi-protection that began on November 25, and would conclude on February 25, but there have been at least two intervening, shorter ECP periods. The semi-protection should last until at least February 25. MPFitz1968 (talk) 06:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 07:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor has a very strange concept of what this article is about. Has bulk tag bombed it and thinks this article is about a company, and not a league. The-Pope (talk) 08:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced, humorous, and unverifiable content. --- Tbf69 P • T 09:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Karnataka based geo locations articles are frequently targeted by non Kannada editors who will add Additional language/regional languages etc . To the articles , in Karnataka State only Kannada language is Official and no other languages are recognised as regional languages in the state. Please give protection to this article. Nimmoun (talk) 06:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —ScottyWong— 07:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Please separate the examples in the "Accusations of antisemitism" section so that it is clear which responses were actually made to the game itself, and which ones are background information. The statement by the Anglo-Jewish Campaign Against Antisemitism as well as the one by Jon Stewart are about the books and films, but they are mixed with Travis Northup's response in such a way that it may mislead people. Ammaeli (talk) 02:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Header section on Space Race implies that the USA won. Please change: They also competed in the Space Race, which culminated in the 1969 American spaceflight in which the U.S. was the first nation to land humans on the Moon. to: They also competed in the Space Race, which led to the USSR's Sputnik 1 in 1957 and Yuri Gagarin's orbit of Earth in 1961. The USA caught up in 1969 by landing humans on the Moon.
FabFabFay (talk) 11:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
The article claims the game is set in 1899 but that is not possible as a letter in game states Sirius Black the second still is a Hogwarts student at that time, as he is born in 1877, he would have finished school by that time. Furthermore, a letter between Ursula Black and Phineas Black the Headmaster also states Cygnus Black has just started to crawl. As he is born in 1889, the likeliest year for the game to be set is in 1889 or 1890. TonkyBonks (talk) 17:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent vandalism and unsourced edits, was relatively recently protected with disruption continuing upon expiry. TylerBurden (talk) 11:49, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous attempts at vandalism and unsourced information by numerous IPs to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 13:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TwoTwoHello (talk) 13:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the previous protection expired, the same Kiev > Kyiv problem continued. // Timothy :: talk 13:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing -- A lot of unexplained content removal has been done by IPs in the last two weeks or so. Edwordo13 (talk) 13:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by new user account. Adding unsourced, negative information contra to WP:BLP. Geoff | Who, me? 13:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of misinformation (including false death) being added by unknown users 185.22.224.96 (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like one person in the UK, somewhere around the 2a00 IP node/particular IP address/London keeps on posting nonsense in an attempt to advertise...something? Persistent vandal/"contributor". Can someone just make it so unregistered accounts can't edit this article? Shearonink (talk) 15:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from ip hopping vandal. Wesoree (Talk) 15:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of repeated IP vandalism - last today. Just look at the page history. Thanks in advance. Der HON (talk) 16:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
16 February 2023
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. MilesLogic (talk) 19:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – IPs are not among the problems that afflict this article. Favonian (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
change the word the to yes 167.88.226.51 (talk) 18:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done – No! Favonian (talk) 18:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive sock Magherbin (talk) 17:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 18:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Marjorie Taylor Greene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Talk:Marjorie Taylor Greene (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite administrator only move protection: Highly visible pages that have no reason to be moved, per WP:GREENLOCK. — Treetoes023 (talk) 01:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Confirmed, the page Marjorie Taylor Greene has indefinite extended confirmed move protection. I am requesting that it is increased to administrator only move protection, for both the article and its corresponding talk page. — Treetoes023 (talk) 02:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- There are 3 common criteria laid out at WP:GREENLOCK, this article meets none of them. This seems pointless. Zaathras (talk) 02:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- This article does meet one of the 3 common criteria laid out at WP:GREENLOCK; "Highly visible pages that have no reason to be moved, such as the administrators' noticeboard and articles selected as "Today's featured article" on the main page.". — Treetoes023 (talk) 02:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- That criteria is too loose to apply to this page. I just spot-checked over a dozen members of Congress who are regarded as highly controversial as MTG is. From Matt Gaetz to Ilhan Omar to Lauren Boebert to Lindsey Graham, and none of them have move protection set higher than extended-confirmed. I remain opposed to this unnecessary creeping bureaucracy. Zaathras (talk) 03:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's also subject to WP:ARBDS under "American Politics 2." --IanDBeacon (talk) 03:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- This article does meet one of the 3 common criteria laid out at WP:GREENLOCK; "Highly visible pages that have no reason to be moved, such as the administrators' noticeboard and articles selected as "Today's featured article" on the main page.". — Treetoes023 (talk) 02:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- There are 3 common criteria laid out at WP:GREENLOCK, this article meets none of them. This seems pointless. Zaathras (talk) 02:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Confirmed, the page Marjorie Taylor Greene has indefinite extended confirmed move protection. I am requesting that it is increased to administrator only move protection, for both the article and its corresponding talk page. — Treetoes023 (talk) 02:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. No need for more than what already is there. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism for an upcoming film, 1 month is probably enough for it to settle down. The WordsmithTalk to me 02:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 18:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism...again. BattleshipMan (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple vandals with different accounts. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 00:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent long-term misuse of the talk page that doesn't seem to be going to stop anytime soon ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent vandalism from a certain user. I know exactly who is vandalising it and I know that they will not stop if they are able to edit it. Rwpardey01 (talk) 22:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Edit: the IP address has been blocked but I believe that the page is still at risk from vandalism by others who may be associated with the user Rwpardey01 (talk) 22:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A series of IPs (probably same person) keeps changing sourced information in the infobox without explanation. They've done it 3 times in the last few days. Another IP was also doing it earlier on 23 January. R Prazeres (talk) 01:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. We don't protect pages from a single user. I've issued a formal warning. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Full protection: No reason for this not to be fully protected. 196.191.213.61 (talk) 03:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent redirect overwrite to duplicate of Pradal serey without consensus. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Larkin to Larkins Housemartin18 (talk) 00:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done Page isn't protected. —ScottyWong— 01:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I want to request semi-protection for the article cris mj in Wikipedia to avoid vandalism Saaaaaaam7 (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This is the user's third attempt to protect a non-existent article, and they appear to have made pointless sandbox edits in order to get autoconfirmed as well as commit other vandalism. The WordsmithTalk to me 02:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined for those reasons. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit Warring/Recently Released Episode. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined As I have just explained at ANEW, I think a particularly experienced user's intervention has taken care of things here. In any event, it's a little much to ask for an article previously never protected to get ECP. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War. Per the community consensus, Only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area
without offering any exceptions for editing articles. We're getting a mix of general vandalism and other disruption generally, and actually enforcing the community sanction here by protecting the page would be helpful in preventing future disruption to the page content that is related to the individual's role in the Russo-Ukrainian War. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of AP Vandalism GuardianH (talk) 07:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit more than 2 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 08:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP users frequently add photos and URL links to the "cannabis stores" and/or cannabis products. Noktonissian (talk) 07:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Incidents like that every 2 weeks or so are not "frequently". Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- If it's not justifiable for semi-protection status, could it be possible for the history log that contains the link to the cannabis shop to be deleted. Because this kind of information is illegal in many jurisdictions. Thank you. Noktonissian (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 07:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 07:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. — Czello 08:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:B9C8:BB16:B8D4:3189 (talk) 13:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive image changes from similar ips. $chnauzer 08:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Constant vandalism Seaparrot876 (talk) 09:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 11:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and vandalism by accounts with few edits Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 2 disruptive edits this year is not a "high" level. Lectonar (talk) 10:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @User:Lectonar, There have been at least 8 disruptive edits in the last year. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 11:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Bohemian Baltimore: have a thorough read of our protection policy please, if you haven't done so already. 11 run of the mill disruptive edits in about 14 months is very, very far from a level of disruption which would make protection of any kind necessary. Lectonar (talk) 11:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @User:Lectonar, There have been at least 8 disruptive edits in the last year. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 11:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Reasi district is highly as sensitive territorial area of j and k union territory .it lies in the north of j and k with kulgam district it neighborhood in the north . It is a disputed area used to be highly terrorism area . Pakistan is claiming its own but it lies in Indian territory as well lithium reserves have been found in this district that is why their are chances of overseas attacks.. Das yug 1 (talk) 11:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits, communal edits, targeting of ethnicities, terrorism zone area . Das yug 1 (talk) 11:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism, disruptive edits, communal edits targeting of ethnicities and highly terrorism area.. Das yug 1 (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 11:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits by IPs Isi96 (talk) 06:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 11:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP address edit warring continuing. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 08:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 11:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High rate of Russian povpushing Alkse2 (talk) 08:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 11:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP user keeps adding unsourced content saying that “PHMedia” used to be called “Infocom Club”. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 11:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced information by numerous IPs to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 14:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: IP user admonished. I hate to SP for long 'cause the moment I do 20 RS appear. ping me if it starts up again. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IPs lately. Magitroopa (talk) 14:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Newly created Wikipedia users and some various IP address users keep on doing unreferenced and unsure edits causing other users to revert their vandalism for how many times. Some of them include unnecessary edit descriptions as well. Mr. Kenshin (talk) 15:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oh beauty pageant editors, what will Wikipedia do without you.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 15:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: this page has been redirected long ago and no longer servers as a viable sandbox. Lets force ediors to the real sandbox that is automated. Moxy- 16:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Jfire (talk) 16:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from various IPs, not exactly sure why. Catalyzzt (talk) 18:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism by IP editor, most likely sock of Eustatius Strijder as he has history of abusing multiple account (including IP) to edit Indonesian history article. Ckfasdf (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Alan Pardew
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because Aris have sacked Alan Pardew and no need for protection. 80.7.173.88 (talk) 15:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The protection was applied only today. It is pretty bad form to request unprotection almost immediately without discussing it with the protecting administrator. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced character names, and other such disruptions, since the previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unreferenced additions from South African IPs. Binksternet (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It has never been protected before, and I only see one recent flareup, so I don't think we can ask for ECP just yet. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The amount of vandalism this talk page has experienced over the past two years in a row is absurd. Please put an end to this madness. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite may be warranted, but let's try a shorter period first. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie: This page was previously protected (scroll to the bottom of the page) in April 2022, and immediately after the protection lifted the vandalism came pouring back in. I urge you to reconsider. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Petty IP vandalism, ongoing event so worth protecting it from IPs until the end of the tournament (26 February). Joseph2302 (talk) 20:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term protection to discourage the current persistent vandal. Slywriter (talk) 21:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Several IP editors adding unsourced controversial info on this BLP, after many periods of protection for the same thing. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 22:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
17 February 2023
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to his controversies claims, his article is vandalised by many IPs. In India, Hindu peoples supports him and other peoples of other religion oppose him. You can see this. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 17:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article hasn't even been around for a month. I see occasional disruption but not persistent disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 20:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Regular partial page blanking by IPs, noting subject area does also include areas defined as contentious issues where certain edits counts (eastern Europe, Balkans (Serbia) etc) and I think (but am still learning this) 500/30 rules apply here. CT55555(talk) 21:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected, let is first see whether this works.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unconstructive edits over several days; needs short-term protection following recent move to new club. Eagleash (talk) 22:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unsourced changes and what look like haphazard removals of valid content (like categories or templates) – Uanfala (talk) 21:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked /64 range. Please use WP:AIV if they resume after block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurrent image vandalism from socking. Nsevs • Talk 21:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Materialscientist (talk) 02:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --IWI (talk) 01:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism, edit wars, people putting misinformation about the disaster. 2600:6C48:627F:BFD8:ED50:ADD9:E4AE:1F60 (talk) 22:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done. Page already semi-protected. If you want to make changes to it, you can use the talk page. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IPs starting petty edit wars and not reading the guidelines. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article is constantly being disrupted; click here [17] and then Ctrl + F "reverted", that's a whole lotta yellow (I know this goes all the way back to June 2021, but still). It often has to do with changing the ownership of this diamond, such as the recent edit I reverted [18]. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring by a new user and now an IP over inclusion of site owner's names, which is currently being discussed on the talk page and a noticeboard. Round and rounder (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, primarily from IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 22:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of a prolific sockmaster. Previously blocked, but being vandalised again now that block has expired. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 01:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: An IP editor continues to re-add the same thing despite being reverted by multiple editors and they are now ignoring a hidden note. -- Zoo (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent target of a sockfarm. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 01:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Materialscientist: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... OK, it's only been PC-protected. Let's see if it suffices. Favonian (talk) 10:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism removing images containing depictions of the prophet Muhammad. These images are historically significant and Wikipedia is not censored. — Jumbo T (talk) 09:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Please separate the examples in the "Accusations of antisemitism" section so that it is clear which responses were actually made to the game itself, and which ones are background information. The statement by the Anglo-Jewish Campaign Against Antisemitism as well as the one by Jon Stewart are about the books and films, but they are mixed with Travis Northup's response in such a way that it may mislead people.
Additionally, please provide a detailed rejection explanation if this is not possible. Ammaeli (talk) 23:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected. Talk:Hogwarts Legacy is no longer protected, and it's the best place to make the request. Favonian (talk) 06:54, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: Sockpuppetry. 173.196.202.242 (talk) 21:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last sock edit was 4 months ago. Favonian (talk) 12:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2a05:9cc3:66:f8ac::/64 blocked from editing the article for a week. Favonian (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2a05:9cc3:66:f8ac::/64 blocked from editing the article for a week. Favonian (talk) 11:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: several politics-guided reversed edits 94.29.12.50 (talk) 06:57, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and highly prone to misinformation Jishiboka1 (talk) 07:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Spam. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 09:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The ip users keep messing it up 96.106.43.35 (talk) 12:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:32, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 14:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 14:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP disruption. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from the same IP user; changing the order of episodes around. Has been going on for sometime now. BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Jayron32 19:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of a prolific sockmaster. Previously blocked, but vandalism has returned now that protection is over. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 19:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 21:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Significant IP/New user vandalism WippleStick (talk) 19:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring, conflict of interest by the Detroit IP range Special:Contributions/2603:3015:300:BC00:0:0:0:0/64. The IPs are promoting a talent agency.[19]. Binksternet (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2603:3015:300:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Jayron32.. Everything from that range is spam, and it's the only thing from that range. Jayron32 19:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IP editors trying to change NFL coach's team while talks are in progress. Schazjmd (talk) 15:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 17:26, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @KrakatoaKatie: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Done – Now it is. Favonian (talk) 21:42, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and disruption by LTA IP sock Snowflake91 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
18 February 2023
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of IP vandalism due to recent release of the Public Order Emergency Commission report (of which he was the Commissioner). TheShadowScaredMe (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New users and IPs are repeatedly changing the name, changing referenced content, and/or deleting referenced content pertaining to the 2021 name change. There are maybe a dozen or so reverts in the last week by different users & IPs. — MarkH21talk 21:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined because semi-protection would not help. Most of the problem edits are being done by a single editor who is auto-confirmed. I posted a warning on their talk page. MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 16:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism of a single nature has been continously ongoing since last year, being carried out by multiple accounts and IP's most likelly connected to a single person!. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 04:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from various IPs over the past month. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent High level of IP Vandalism. 139.135.38.204 (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Nthep. for one day. Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The previous protection of 6 months expired two days ago and already we have new accounts/IPs changing the nationality. Mellk (talk) 20:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism The Young Prussian (talk) 22:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 04:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 00:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 04:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. BangJan1999 01:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Issue appears to have been solved with the opening of the RfD. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 04:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP users; adding info not sourced and niche services. BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The page is supposed to be protected. A few days ago, I undoed an edit that had suspicions of a conflict of interest. Also, by looking at the date of its modification, there are many modifications that worked to remove prominent and important things, and also the article of a political figure that will witness many attempts of sabotage. Osps7 (talk) 19:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 04:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor is adding unsourced content. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 02:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Several IP users keep on vandalizing the page making other Wikipedia editors fix it again and again. Mr. Kenshin (talk) 23:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Tails Wx 02:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of maintenance templates, addition of spammy links, and other MOS problems from an IP hopper over the last week or so. Millahnna (talk) 06:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: There's been an ongoing edit war on this article over the neo-Nazi controversy in Ukraine and the use of the Edelweiss honorific, this seems to need moderator attention, or the controversy will just keep being erased and reframed and erased again. Talataash (talk) 02:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing by persistent IPs, after last protection expired. —MelbourneStar☆talk 03:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 04:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Featured on main page, so lots of action, mostly from newbie editors or IPs. See:
user:Patrick Bateman89
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1140044399
user:219.95.15.74
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1140048313
user:23.137.250.5
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1140049842
user:Errems46
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1140052207
user:67.180.143.89
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1140056179
user:2601:348:481:CA10:6879:87AF:CEF1:D122
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1140066872. {{u|WikiWikiWayne}} {Talk}
08:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today's featured article, rapid vandalism from multiple unrelated IPs. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 17:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined It's now off the Main Page and vandalism seems to have died off with that. Daniel Case (talk) 05:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing from IP that vandalised the page. The 2022 is already released, so there is no need to put upcoming. LancedSoul (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 173.243.160.224 (talk · contribs). by Widr Daniel Case (talk) 06:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs — N Panama 84534 20:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing, really, in the last two days. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Continuing to add unsourced information from IP. LancedSoul (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-Protection needed for Celebrity pages to some period of time.Spbvj (talk) 07:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: so much vandalism after his body was found today. 85.107.138.197 (talk) 09:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Favonian (talk) 11:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 10:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – re-adding of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 12:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As the page edit history, many users are adding non-WP:RS links and adding blog links. Hence, I request for a protection supervised by administrators before approved. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Already semi'd. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 13:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 11:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – This character vandalizes a broad pallette of user talk pages couple of times a week, only to be bulk reverted. It's been going on for years. Temporary protection of individual pages won't really help. Favonian (talk) 11:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Same as above. Favonian (talk) 11:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Kellie-Jay is an activist who advocates for women's rights to single-sex spaces, language, and law based on the protected characteristic of biological sex. 2603:7081:5902:B58:9400:1CF0:65B2:6371 (talk) 20:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- This isn't requesting a specific edit to be made and even if it were the talk page is not protected. Make an actual request there, in format "change <foo> to <bar>" and providing whatever sources may be required to support the change. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 20:41, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 11:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page was semi-protected last year for the exact same reason. But ever since the protection lifted, too many IP editors have returned. Also last year, newer accounts were created for the same purpose of disrupting and vandalizing the article. The semi-protection needs to be extended much longer, perhaps indefinitely. Sylvester Millner (talk) 04:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Not seeing prior protection in log. Was it lost in a page move? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: Yes, it used to be Mahajir (Pakistan). Favonian (talk) 12:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: This probably falls into a formerly known as discretionary sanctions area, but it's just an ordinary admin action. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Just reinstated the prior protect, which would have newly expired. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Bot interprets the last "Note" as "Jury's still out. Favonian (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Three IPs have arrived so far and started edit warring by removing sourced info. One of them has already been blocked. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Deepfriedokra: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Now they are protected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Bot interprets the last "Note" as "Jury's still out. Favonian (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Page was recently unprotected, only for vandalism from the same IP hopper to continue. Perhaps this needs long-term or even indefinite protection. Link20XX (talk) 16:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Protected 7/1/23 and then again 31/1/23 and requesting it a third time as the page is a vandalism magnet, with allegations of criminality and other BLP major problems. I don't think this is going to be fixed by a third two week protection, I'll just be here in 2 weeks. CT55555(talk) 16:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: @Favonian: or @Bbb23: Please check my work? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Done – Cabal approved! Favonian (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. The person just died, altho the IPs AGF adding the same info, there's too much disruption at the moment — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not entirely clear about the BLP violations, however, there are some other issues going on. The volume of IP activity would overwhelm the pending changes reviewers. Chetsford (talk) 18:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Some LTA harassment. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, people are still doxxing the streamer, providing highly unreliable sources for the claim, the streamer never confirmed the name or any other highly personal information on stream. I would request, similarly to the last approved request, to protect this page for the streamer's safety. SturmFernmelder (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing to page by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Armegon (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism resulting from Grady's role in ongoing UCU strikes. Zakhx150 (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Being targeted by some LTA. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One attack so far. Favonian (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/BKFIP starting up again on this article. MrOllie (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
The article doesn't include anything about the controversy over the use of symbols associated with Nazi Germany in the modern Ukrainian miltary (see: Azov movement) and there was an edit war over this. It's a contentious issue but I feel that Wikipedia cannot simply ignore it, omitting it feels like the opposite of neutrality yet we also need context on how Russian propaganda exploits this situation. The edit war was frustrating. I requested the article be protected and now I hope someone can add the relevant information without it being erased.
The 10 Separate Mountain Assault Brigade's honorific name and symbol: 'Edelweiss' is controversial for the association with Nazi Germany's 1 Mountain Division, also called 'Edelweiss'. In light of the Ukrainian military's Azov movement and the parades for Stepan Bandera, this is extremely contentious and the information needs to be presented neutrally. Talataash (talk) 13:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- This article's talk page is not protected; make this request there. Be warned that this is in two contentious topics and that special rules apply. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
19 February 2023
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Unexplained transformation into a redirect (just because it's the only Kamen Rider page with a movie doesn't mean it's less valid for that). LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 22:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Timeline of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine: phase 4 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:RUSUKR. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 22:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism resumed immediately after unprotection. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 23:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian (talk) 23:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing by sock since 6th of January Magherbin (talk) 22:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Possible recent death. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 23:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done. It appears the death has been sourced and no edit warring or BLP violation is ocurring. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 01:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 04:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 05:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A mysterious number of IPs and a confirmed sockpuppet of MakaveliReed appear to have been repeatedly been engaging on this page to insert a "more citations needed" tag as if it were from 2008. Unclear what the motivation is, but the disruption needs to stop. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Doudrop is move-protected until 1 May 2023. However its talk page is not move-protected and someone moved it[20]. I think the talk page needs same protection too. Mann Mann (talk) 07:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of May 1, 2023, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rash of apparently-promotional IP edits "fixing" what isn't broken. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 09:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP disruption - Sockpuppetry. Also disrupted other pages such as Eslamabad-e Gharb. Semsûrî (talk) 14:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This article being protected is unfair because this page is about the nursery rhyme of Jack Horner and not the film version but there was a section on this article about the film version and some IP addresses wanted to improve that section by adding that Jack Horner was the main antagonist of the film Puss in Boots: The Last Wish (which he was) and not some major antagonist and then added that the character portrayed in the movie was "megalomaniacal, ruthless, sadistic, and narcissistic" (which the film also portrayed him as that) and then this page got blocked. There was no need for this article to be protected, no disruptive vandalism ever happened on this page at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.151.194.14 (talk) 11:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Changes will only be implemented if you can get consensus at Talk:Little Jack Horner. Meanwhile, the article will remain protected to prevent edit-warring. Favonian (talk) 12:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: An IP placed unsourced material relating to Season 15. CastJared (talk) 05:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Regular culinary nationalism-driven disruptive editing over the course of past two years with little to no constructive edits in between. The page has already been temporarily protected twice and several of the disruptive editors have been banned. Seeing how most of the disruptive editing comes from newly-registered users, maybe's it's finally time to consider permanent protection against non-autoconfirmed users. Turaids (talk) 11:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – every few weeks this aricle gets vandilized. Moxy- 14:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Request semi-protection: IPs from the same area have been inserting the same spam link to a law firm's website as either a a citation (that doesn't verify the content) or as an actual external link. This has been reverted five times now in the last three days. Imzadi 1979 → 15:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: harassment from homeless GloriaCobain (talk) 16:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple editor, some registered. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
20 February 2023
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs and newly registered users performing MOS-related disruptive editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit war with multiple IP in the last days--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 01:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same IPs associated with a blocked sock keep adding unsourced (and sometimes risible) info. If not pending changes at least semi block it for an extended period. Paris1127 (talk) 16:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive image changes from IP hopper. MrOllie (talk) 17:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 07:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Unregistered and/or anonymous users posting misinformation about the disappearance of this person. Repeatedly posting unexplained edits, confirming a body that was recovery today belongs to the missing person, with no current evidence confirming this.
There have also been offensive edits from anon users adding "missing white woman syndrome" into the See Also section.
This missing person, Nicola Bulley's disappearance has already attracted much unwanted speculation from the media and members of the public, with her family complaining about this also. This is something that will likely become more prevalent in coming days, if/when the body is confirmed to be Nicola's.
The anonymous user is 2605:A601:AE1E:400:E9D5:8FB1:1B39:E1B4. They have repeatedly added content asserting that the body is Nicola Bulley's, despite no announcement yet. Reduolf13 (talk) 18:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. —ScottyWong— 07:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 07:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. —ScottyWong— 08:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP users are continually removing the part about her being a conspiracy theorist with no good explanation. -CopperyMarrow15 (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 08:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of sockfarm. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 00:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. —ScottyWong— 08:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly sockpuppetry. Lemonaka (talk) 00:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See history for numerous prior protections. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 08:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit warring, IP-hopping POV pusher attempting to claim that the apostrophe is a letter in the English alphabet. Range blocks have not been effective. Current block is on Special:Contributions/2600:1014:B00B:2671:0:0:0:0/64. Meters (talk) 21:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. —ScottyWong— 08:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spamming. Tropicalkitty (talk) 06:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:23, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Sudden surge of IPs changing content of article without source as to a return of a member to the group and adding other unsourced content. Nate • (chatter) 01:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent POV-pushing in violation of Rfc. David12345 (talk) 01:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support there's been a campaign regarding Abraham's supposed ethnic background (contrary to Abraham's own declaration about his ethnicity) for years. The page history is littered with the struck-out usernames of POV warriors, and the edit summaries filled with claims of Assyrian ethnicity. This was finally handled in a unanimous Rfc. Mathglot (talk) 04:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry & addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 02:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:47, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Yeti Dai (talk) 04:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Protection ended, IP-disruption began again. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection:: 109.165.155.147 and other IPs that Geolocate to Banja Luka (Bosnia) repeated POV posting in last 2 days to Talk:Duchy of Saint Sava. WP:DUCK block evasion by sockmaster Great Khaan. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Great Khaan/Archive - sockmaster has obsession with this article. Latest IP post is a repeat of past post of one of Great Khaan' socks - this compared to this DeCausa (talk) 23:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 109.165.152.0/22 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for three months. Of course they're often away for that long anyway, but this way we know for sure they will be. Daniel Case (talk) 07:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Some new user (most likely a sock) keeps adding text to the logo that not part of logo. E.g. here "product of robi" is not part of logo, i am 100% sure. As far i saw, all the promotional, marketing and other materials of Airtel Bangladesh (online & offline) doesn’t include that text (even logo printed on the actual sim card). আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —ScottyWong— 08:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs- possibly the same person across multiple IPs/ranges. Magitroopa (talk) 01:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 09:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Continued vandalism. This is the third page protection request for the same page, the same IP vandal has been at it since at least October 2022. Jpatokal (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 09:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing by various iP users since at least August 2022. --Lasunncty (talk) 09:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Endless string of unsourced financial changes - Arjayay (talk) 10:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent (2 weeks) disruptive editing from different ranges of IPs 3limeline (talk) 13:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Will start with one week. As I'm working RfPP again, I can escalate as needed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – my page being frequently vandalized since last month, thus i want to ask for user page protection. however not talk page protection as i want get a grip of the current vandal who impersonates me. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: @Sakura emad: Welp. All I is see is edits by you and badges automatically awarded for the Wikipedia Adventure stuff. Lookinh through the history, it's all you except the removal of a deprecated category.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:47, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Are you confusing your userpage for your talk page? Cause the impersonator vandal is going for your talk page and not your userpage. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- NOpe, excluded talk page specifically. There's a filter that prevents non auto confirmed from editing user pages. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- NIce catch, though -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- NOpe, excluded talk page specifically. There's a filter that prevents non auto confirmed from editing user pages. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. (talk page vandal)-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra thanks for your service, i wasn't aware of such a filter protecting user pages, @Blaze Wolf it seems you're talking to me "Are you confusing your userpage for your talk page" no i am not. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IPs and SPAs adding false and misleading information. Probably Special:CentralAuth/Matteo_sportelli a LTA. GreenC 14:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IPs and SPAs adding false and misleading information. Probably Special:CentralAuth/Matteo_sportelli a LTA. GreenC 14:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IPs and SPAs adding false and misleading information. Probably Special:CentralAuth/Matteo_sportelli a LTA. GreenC 14:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:23, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IPs and SPAs adding false and misleading information. Probably Special:CentralAuth/Matteo_sportelli a LTA. GreenC 14:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The former redirect page is indefinitely fully-protected to prevent repeated restorations in 2019. Since the article was restored per consensus at RfD Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_February_7#NyQuil, they left indef full-protection intact, which I think it is not longer necessary. Stylez995 (talk) 16:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected As the protecting admin is only seldom active at the moment, I have restored access for all. After reading the discussion, and looking at the back and forth over the years, I think this should be discussed via AfD. Lectonar (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One user keeps restoring old editions of this page. 3 times his edits have been reverted. FLA-ALP-1 (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Usually we don't protect to stop a single user. Lectonar (talk) 14:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Cultural conflicts exist between Thailand and Cambodia. causing some Cambodians Come and edit the Thai cuisine page on Wikipedia. cause misinformation to stray from the truth, so I ask that this page be protected. in order not to cause another mistake to be corrected. 2405:9800:B943:56C7:59D6:9:3AD1:12A7 (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: content dispute. they need to discuss. Thus -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requested short-term protection due to IP users and new users reverting the change of infobox image. Hazhk (talk) 17:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
21 February 2023
Reason: Have requested this before but it was declined. However, vandalism has persisted. High level of IP vandalism - IPs keep changing to "twelfth season" for new show despite being warned. Requesting longer page protection for the 2023 upcoming series and maybe a shorter one on the main Frasier article as well? SitcomyFan (talk) 07:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Have requested this before but it was declined. However, vandalism has persisted. High level of IP vandalism - IPs keep changing to "twelfth season" for new show despite being warned. Requesting longer page protection for the 2023 upcoming series and maybe a shorter one on the main Frasier article as well? SitcomyFan (talk) 07:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This page should be ECP'd as per all other pages relating to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Compusolus (talk) 11:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined I see no great disruption at the moment, and the article will probably end up being merged somewhere. If disruption picks up, please relist. Lectonar (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The article was indefinitely semi-protected back in 2011 by @Fluffernutter:, who appears to be largely inactive. Requesting it be unprotected or pending changes protected as it is rarely edited. The last update, outside of bots or the like or copy edits was in July 2022. S0091 (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected I'm willing to give it a try. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs and sockpuppets targeting the page for long time. Fragrant Peony (talk) 09:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 01:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC) 01:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- The page contains implicit bias and the bias was rightfully removed.
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
BalaenopteraMusculus123 (talk) 01:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC) - Seems you have a history of bias.
- https://www.danielpipes.org/comments/259905
BalaenopteraMusculus123 (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC) Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Over 4 years has elapsed since protection was applied. I contacted the admin who placed the protection but s/he didn't respond LibStar (talk) 01:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected here, Sdrqaz (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:TFA, target of vandalism. ZLEA T\C 18:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done: now moot. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: frequent and persistent vandalism TvdorVladimirescu (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Disruptive edits only coming from 117.211.192.26 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), who hasn't edited in seven hours now. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SuperBowlfan123 (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:D1CB:3000:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SuperBowlfan123 (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:D1CB:3000:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent editing of one sentence by IPs. The edit is grammatically incorrect and multiple users have tried reverting it, but to no avail. Juve2000 (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined, mainly because if there is action to be taken, a partial range block should be taken against 111.243.128.0/17 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) instead of protection. However, given that the last edit was on 18 February, no action for now. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 01:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined for now. This is an edge case, but there's been one G4 since the AfD. I'll keep an eye on it. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Sockpuppetry. 103.119.141.236 (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was 18 days ago, and it wasn't disruptive either. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple IP addresses within the same IP range (IP hopping) and a random username editor out of nowhere have been doing the same disruptive edits non-stop. — YoungForever(talk) 16:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing IP attempts to add WP:SYNTH / WP:OR or maybe just incorrect WP:BLP, basically adding the race of a shooting suspect who is a child (not supporte by any sources). Exact same changes being made by different IPs. CT55555(talk) 22:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of sockfarm. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 22:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from unique IP and unconfirmed users. –RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 23:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 08:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Date-changing vandal from Guatemala. Binksternet (talk) 05:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2803:D100:98A0:330:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a month after you reported this to AIV. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short disambiguation page for a current slang term, where kids inevitably keep writing in the name of a person who they think it applies to. Belbury (talk) 07:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 08:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by anonymous IPs. Yuugone (talk) 09:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A number of (deliberate) factual errors have been introduced to this page in recent days and have been left unchallenged. Unfortunately large unsourced tables like this tend to be a magnet for wikifiddlers. I feel the page needs a much much longer period of semi-protection than has previously been applied to it. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content by dynamic IPs. -- Alex_21 TALK 10:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting extended-confirmed protection due to a significant amount of disruption from sockpuppets of User:Buzzards-Watch Me Work for over a year. Sable232 (talk) 23:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Additional of unsourced material. CastJared (talk) 09:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is a rather recent article, and I count about 2 instances of addition of unsourced material. Not every new user knows about Wikipedia's sometimes rather byzantine policies and requirements when starting editing here. Lectonar (talk) 09:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Please add to the heading that 'this page has been written by people/a person with a particularly negative view of letting women speak.' Yveyveyve (talk) 07:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Please use the article talk-page to make that request. Lectonar (talk) 09:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: To whom it may concern, I act on behalf of Mr Tim Dawson, I can provide a letter of authority if requested via email: joy.martin@ex-seed.co.uk
This page includes the false allegation: In 2019, the Guardian newspaper reported that Dawson - a keen supporter of Brexit - was acting as the public face of the pro-Brexit organisation, Britain's Future[14].The organisation was the biggest single UK political advertiser on Facebook, spending £422,000 campaigning for a hard Brexit.[15] The money was spent buying "dark ads" targeting anti-Brexit politicians.[16] Dawson has refused to answer questions about who funded his campaign.[17]
Mr Dawson has never been arrested, charged or convicted of this and we can evidence this with his criminal record. Under Article 17 The Right to Erasure this must be deleted because it is Inadequate, it is not an adequate representation of him as an individual nor the nature of events. It is excessive as it suggests he is guilty of a crime. It is irrelevant because he has never been convicted or investigated of this and a significant amount of time has passed since. It is inaccurate too. This must be removed. We have edited this out multiple times but one individual under the name: Garnett F has been reposting it despite this breaching guidelines.
Please respond to this request via email:
joy.martin@ex-seed.co.uk 91.125.4.146 (talk) 15:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've protected the article from ongoing disruption, but this is not the place to address your concern. Try Talk:Tim Dawson or WP:BLPN. Also, no one is going to reply to you via email. —ScottyWong— 16:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has sustained repeated vandalism by mostly school IPs, likely targeted as it is studied in some sort of school curriculum in multiple states. CutlassCiera 15:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected until summer, when school is likely on break. —ScottyWong— 16:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, page has been protected in the past for similar reasons. HappyWith (talk) 15:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 16:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I have a reference link for the early life section of the page and I want it to be used in the page Raqib Zaman (talk) 12:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined The linked page is not protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- My guess is this is intended to be targeted at Rishi Sunak like the other two requests on the page, since the target article here is on a Bulgarian village. What's gotten him into the news recently? —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: a lot of information are wrongly given and needs to be correctified Raqib Zaman (talk) 12:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done Request changes on Talk:Rishi Sunak. Anarchyte (talk) 13:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Many of the information in the article are not true and hence, the article needs to be correctified Alison Johnson Smith (talk) 13:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 13:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Only active editing of the page is back-and-forth reverting of a specific passage due to personal vendetta. As such I think restricting public IPs (to only allow named users) is wise. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cortex_Command#Cortex_Command_Community_Project 86.140.242.102 (talk) 13:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of disruptive edits / vandalism by IPs and newly registered users. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)
Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
22 February 2023
- Talk:Southern Kurdish (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Eslamabad-e Gharb (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Qasr-e Shirin (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:BLOCKEVASION and spam by IP hoppers of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Syntaktis123. Would appreciate it if a (range)-block or two was also made. EDIT: They are also targeting other articles to a lesser degree, such as Eyvan, where they write nonsense like this [21]. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well, the IPs have now been blocked, so I don't think this is necessary anymore. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 94.24.0.0/16 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. For 2 weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Consistent addition of unsourced information. Edwordo13 (talk) 15:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't know how much it will help, because a lot of the problem edits are coming from auto-confirmed users. MelanieN (talk) 00:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:29, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TheWikiholic (talk) 17:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Same reason as before, IP adding unsourced generation "data" to the article. BilletsMauves€500 10:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was four days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Same reason as before, IP keeps adding generation "data" to the article BilletsMauves€500 10:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As above, last edit was four days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 21:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP and new editors. Schazjmd (talk) 23:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Linked to Twitter personality with 400k+ followers. Unlikely to stop - I would suggest lengthy semi-protection or possibly indefinite given the BLP issues. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 00:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz . Materialscientist (talk) 01:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive and offensive IP inclusions on article during this month. Chronikhiles (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SP013 (talk) 18:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The Sarah Bulley case is being repeatedly added without adequate sourcing. It has been ongoing for a few days now. I am pretty sure there is some socking going on too. Betty Logan (talk) 06:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Most of the edits to the page are spam attempts by non-autoconfirmed users PaulT2022 (talk) 21:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., indeed, the last non-reverted non-autoconfirmed edit was in August 2022, about 70 edits back.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 1keyhole (talk) 04:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 dsyd, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: User "Trincao" keeps reverting the notable information about the fraudulent activities of an award winner. Grouptheorist (talk) 05:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Long term edit-warring from an IP editor. There is an AN/EW filing to deal with this as well. Mr rnddude (talk) 10:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Support - there is a history of one editor abusing multiple IPs to edit war in the same change, over and over. Previous IP bans and protections expire and so he is back again. An indefinite page protection is required to prevent the cyclical edit wars and rush to report the same editor. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 10:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Oh, I remember. Acts like the part they don't like refer to the person and not the stele. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: I can't SP for all eternity. Someone will complain about how abusive and not bright I am, eventually. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ohnoitsjamie: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Done – Now it is. Favonian (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: quackery-related disinformation 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 02:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotection: Yesterday, the shooting of this film has begun and I want to create a draft about this film. See the sources which says shooting has been begun. The Economic Times, Pinkvilla and The Times of India. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 12:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Maile66: protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 12:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Done — Maile (talk) 13:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 13:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yuugone (talk) 03:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Edits which display different opinions about the lenght of the plot, or the content of an article are not automatically vandalism, so please don't label them as such. Engage the other users on the article talk-page, and try to find consensus please. Communication via edit summaries is rarely effective. Lectonar (talk) 12:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Repeat vandalism due to red card of teammate Nick Pope. Jfcooper.90 (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 15:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Request for Temporary semi-protection: Multiple drive-by IP's repeatedly vandalizing noted article. Start of the American baseball season and with the Houston Astros sign stealing scandal still fresh in people's minds, their recent winning run is a target for vandalism. Adog (Talk・Cont) 15:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There is an active requested move on talk page Talk:Io Shirai#Requested move 17 February 2023 and an user ignored it and moved the page[22] plus removing requested move tag/template.[23] So please increase move protection level to admin level. Mann Mann (talk) 13:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article is already extended-confirmed move protected. One user belonging to this category moved the article,
possibly because they didn't notice the discussion. A polite message (rather than this accusation of move vandalism) might prevent repetition. Favonian (talk) 14:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)- OK, they did see the notification, at least after the move. Favonian (talk) 14:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. – Edit warring. A similar IP with the same behavior appeared last summer. Lone-078 (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Oh, I recognize them. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: sm mall was Full protected edit pls 112.209.31.36 (talk) 10:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- The protection has since lapsed. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Discussion belongs at Talk:SM City Sorsogon. PS: Block expires 2 February 2024. Favonian (talk) 16:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- So you're right. I blame just waking up to a suicide headache. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP address vandalism removed my well-sourced, factually accurate edits pertaining to subject. RyeCityRoller (talk) 16:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That article was last edited in July prior to your edit. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Excessive vandalism. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 16:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 18:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring and socking. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KieranCallahan72. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:44, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring and socking. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KieranCallahan72. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP users were vandalizing this page that's why it was protected for around a week after I requested for a protection here. When it's protection expired earlier, IP users are back again doing unnecessary edits making us revert them. I'm requesting for a higher protection to protect the integrity of the article. Thanks. Mr. Kenshin (talk) 23:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP altering numbers against sources using multiple IP's. TylerBurden (talk) 23:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try this first--Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Portrait of George Washington Taking the Salute at Trenton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent vandalism, likely due to it being featured on the main page. Partofthemachine (talk) 19:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
To create วีรชัย เหล่าเรืองวัฒนะ (Weerachai Laoruangwattana)
The politician from elected candidate of Bangkok Governor (Thailand) in 2022,the newbie’s politician,who didn’t have any cutouts but got 20,749 Votes (8th Rank) by his policies.
For 2023, He presents the new 3 policies from the New Alternative Party to resolve the Thailand Major problems.
1. Work from home campaign to resolve traffic problems and theirs consequences such as PM2.5 pollution. 2. Anti corruption with AI and Blockchain 3. Educational Applications for every people to reduce the educational gap between rich and poor. WeerachaiLao (talk) 06:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is not the page to request an article. (I should also note that, per your description, any article would fall into WP:GS/CRYPTO.) Try WP:Requested articles instead. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 15:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup qualification (inter-confederation play-offs) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Adding lies about its so-called closure and re-branding. OnurT 01:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 1keyhole (talk) 17:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Recent vandal already blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP disruption after sockmaster was blocked. Semsûrî (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MaterialWorks (talk) 21:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
23 February 2023
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 103.216.56.98 (talk) 18:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Can the page for Shuvo Roy on Wikipedia be locked? Some users are continuously spreading misinformation in them.
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Not the page on the musician, the disambiguation page. Persistent vandalism. Partofthemachine (talk) 19:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Was last vandalized almost a week ago. Sporadic vandalism. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 19:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Article has attracted an increased level of vandalism this month, possibly due to his reaching a scoring threshold recently. I'd like to see more than a standard duration/level of protection, if possible. PKT(alk) 23:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppet disruption. Semsûrî (talk) 18:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 00:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP Vandalism last couple of days ContentEditman (talk) 01:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 range blocked by Tide rolls. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Shurpanakha (talk) 01:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a preemptive request. Miller was just named by police in relation to an open murder investigation involving a teammate (more info here). GPL93 (talk) 03:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done. No major issues in the article's history since the request. Will keep an eye on it. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 00:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Isabelle Belato The page is getting vandalized pretty heavily now. Newtothisedit (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Isabelle Belato The page is getting vandalized pretty heavily now. Newtothisedit (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – PC for a while (I'm a new convert to PC) because some, not all IP editors are making a nuisance of themselves by repeatedly adding the same unsourced content, e.g. about Saudi Arabia. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: high levels of IP disruptive editing regarding height. BappleBusiness[talk] 01:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. for one month Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP and Sockpuppet Vandalism:Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 10:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just once every couple of days at this point, it seems. Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Users have repeatedly tried to alter details about the number of children had by the article's subject. Anderson's first child is documented in reliable sources that are included in the article, but no reliable sources have been presented to back the claim that he has a second child. This seems like a clear BLP policy violation. — Paper Luigi T • C 17:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. While a lot of the edits in the history are disruption or reverts, the more salient thing is that the article is only being edited once every few days to begin with. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Russian IP promoting regime change [24] and whitewashing the role of Russian occupying forces [25] [26] [27]. Made by several IP accounts (same person behind them). Super Ψ Dro 22:36, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two edits in the last three days, and article hadn't been edited since September. Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dorothymikey. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dorothymikey. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Slow-motion edit warring Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Disputants auto confirmed, so- -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- List of awards and nominations received by Tomorrow X Together (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs and newly registered editor persistently vandalizing the award's count in the Infobox to be mismatch with the main table. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Sorsogon City#Retail → Draft:SM City Sorsogon (mall) and protection and edit 124.106.195.16 (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done because there is nothing to do. Neither of those pages are protected, and they never have been. If you are proposing a move, do it at WP:RM. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected Also move-protected at the same level. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. It happened days ago, when an IP is fighting over between mulitple editors. CastJared (talk) 06:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But it has died down in the meantime...Lectonar (talk) 08:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Shuvo Roy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Vandalism, and someone has been spreading misinformation in the page about the person being of Bengali descent only, the person said himself in an interview that his family is from both Bangladesh and India, and thus he is both of Indian and Bangladeshi descent, but someone keeps editing it and changing it back to "Bangladesh" or "Bangladeshi" only and it has been going on for about a year, so I suggest this page should be locked down for protection and to stop misinformation being spread continuously. 43.245.123.52 (talk) 07:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Keep being made make sense word salad not supposed make sense word salad word salad 187.13.245.83 (talk) 07:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Just wait for word salad be made back actual word salad before protect filter stopping word salad restore right now 187.13.245.83 (talk) 07:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Protection of this page is detrimental to the page, as it's missing a bunch of important information, and is heavily outdated. I'm requesting unprotection so the page can be edited by anybody who knows info about the park, as it seems most people on here don't know enough info on it to edit the page. 2601:14F:4400:83D0:E052:1E55:65DA:EC3F (talk) 06:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- If you're uncomfortable unprotecting it now, can you at least set an end date for the protection so it will end on it's own? I don't think that's too much to ask. Thanks. 2601:14F:4400:83D0:E052:1E55:65DA:EC3F (talk) 06:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – In view of this "promise", made only half a year ago by another IP from Mount Laurel, we'd prefer if you make your constructive suggestions at the article talk page. Favonian (talk) 09:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Because there are informations on this page which are outdated and are needed to be fixed. 23 February, 2023
Re: Edits to the "restricted" article on Wikipedia entitled "Muhammad in Islam"
To Whom It May Concern:
The protection allotted this article is no longer necessary because it has clearly been stated in the sacred writings of the Baha'i Faith that the prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is regarded as the "Seal of Thy Prophets and of Thy Messengers", this quote from Prayers and Meditations by Baha'u'llah: XXV, written by Baha'u'llah, co-founder of the Baha'i Faith and Himself a Manifestation of God. The foregoing established, it is misleading to represent Muslims as the only religious group to share this belief.
Respectfully submitted, Mehrozi (talk) 08:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: A ridiculously high level of IP vandalism that has been going on for a long time now. Zingo156 (talk) 06:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Persistent addition of WP:MBFC by IP despite several reverts, please either protect the page or block IP range — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. partial block with admonition to discuss.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Probable IP vandalism Page moving Sweety Roy765 (talk) 10:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – No such article. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Repeat poor and unverified edits by IP users in past 24 hours, similar edit patterns on other pages of related topics. Kazamzam (talk) 04:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Only 2 IPs; article not much edited all in all. Lectonar (talk) 11:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP user vandalism --- Tbf69 P • T 09:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: There is a history of IP edits being repeatedly made, dating back at least to September 2022. The edits are unsourced, do not follow Wikipedia editing guidelines, and are a continuing edit war describing who is, and who is not, in the group's line-up. Despite my reversals, edit summary comments, and leaving notes at some of the IPs talk pages, the edits continue unabated. Maybe a week of semi-protection would send the IPs elsewhere. Thanks, - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 11:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Influx of IP vandalism. CT55555(talk) 12:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: A number of different IP addresses have been removing sources, overwriting information and making unreferenced changes. It's difficult to engage with them when they have roaming IP addresses. Sionk (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs, systematically corrupting the page. Fragrant Peony (talk) 13:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 13:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- commons:File:QR code for mobile English Wikipedia.svg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Can I get access to edit the page, I just want to add information with links but I cannot update the page. I won't anything false or misinformation. Chameleon 97 (talk) 12:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Administrators on this Wikipedia have no control over files at Wikimedia Commons. Favonian (talk) 13:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. The previous protection does not appear to have discouraged this IP hopping vandal as they simply returned. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Users blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 17:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- HOpefully this'll be enough to discourage them. Thanks! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – High vandalism from IP accounts. A similar section requesting the page protection can be found on the article's talk page. ✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 17:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 17:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This is a University IP address, and we need it unblocked after it was wrongfully blocked for no reason given to us. It is against the rules of our University to ban and/or block ANY of our IP addresses here, as our students require the usage of them for their studies. Because it was a wrongful IP address "block" in the first place, giving our IP address page protection was especially unnecessary! In other words- it was never needed to begin with! Factchecker994 (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Wrong venue. This does not concern page unprotection, but IP address unblocking. You've already found your way to User talk:24.78.138.224 where such requests belong. Please be advised that Wikipedia is not subject to the university "rules" you quote above. Favonian (talk) 13:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, it DOES concern page unprotection, as many of our University's students have tried to edit our IP address's page at the request of our school's higher ups, as it says that we need to request page unprotection in order to be able to edit it! We have numerous users here, and we require that we be able to use the IP address! Oh- and EVERYBODY is subject to our University's rules, whether you know it or not! Factchecker994 (talk) 14:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, the page is not protected, but the IP adress is blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- The page is absolutely protected- I even shared the EXACT message that comes up whenever any of our students or faculty members try to edit our IP address's talk page! The dean of of University is working on getting the IP address unblocked, so it was left to me to do this part! PLEASE tell me you understand that at least! Factchecker994 (talk) 15:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, the page is not protected, but the IP adress is blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is what it says anytime any one of us students log in and try to edit our school's IP address page! "This page is currently semi-protected so that only established, registered users can edit it.
- Why is the page protected?
- While most articles can be edited by anyone, semi-protection is sometimes necessary to prevent vandalism to popular pages.
- The reason for protection can be found in the protection log. If there are no relevant entries in the protection log, the page may have been moved after being protected.
- What can I do?
- If you have a user account, log in first. If you do not yet have an account, you may create one; after 4 days and 10 edits, you will be able to edit semi-protected pages.
- Request that the page's protection level be reduced.
- Find out more about how to get started editing Wikipedia.
- If you have noticed an error or have a suggestion for a simple, non-controversial change, please check the talk page first in case the issue is already being discussed. If the issue has not been discussed yet, you can submit an edit request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit. Make sure to clearly describe which page your request is about, and which change exactly you are requesting.
- If you wrote any text, please save it temporarily to your device until you can edit this page." I myself should have the ability to edit such a page, as I have over 10 edits, and have been here for longer than 4 days, but I still get that message if I try to edit our IP address's page while logged in, which shouldn't be possible, as like I said, I have over 10 edits and have been here for longer than 4 days! It said to come on here and request page unprotection, so that's what I'm doing! That's what I had to do! Factchecker994 (talk) 14:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- The talk-page is indeed protected. Please follow the kind advice Favonian has given above. Lectonar (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- We are unable to do that on the talk page, if anyone of our students try to edit anything on the talk page, it says- as follows- " "This page is currently semi-protected so that only established, registered users can edit it." That is exactly what I am, but for some asinine reason, even I cannot do anything on the talk page, which is why when it also said "Request that the page's protection level be reduced.", I knew I had to do that here. If I could've done it on the IP address's talk page, I would've, but despite being an established, registered user, I am unable to do anything on the talk page! Now do you understand the problem? Factchecker994 (talk) 15:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- It wasn't "kind" advice though- it was rude and completely uncalled for! They also didn't realize that I had to come on here AFTER I was unable to do this same thing on our University's IP address talk page because it's protected. The fact that I am the one who has over 10 edits and has been here for over 4 days means that I myself should've been able to ask for this sort of thing on our IP address talk page, so it's baffling to me that I am unable to do that there despite having the qualifications to do so. That smells... fishy, wouldn't you say? Factchecker994 (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Not "fishy" at all. On the contrary, your account is so fresh that it won't be auto-confirmed until February 24, 05:50 (UTC). Favonian (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- The talk-page is indeed protected. Please follow the kind advice Favonian has given above. Lectonar (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- The talk page for our IP address has a notification saying that it is a semi-protected page. It didn't say that yesterday. Maybe it was done in error, maybe it wasn't, but regardless of that, it is indeed protected now! Factchecker994 (talk) 15:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, it DOES concern page unprotection, as many of our University's students have tried to edit our IP address's page at the request of our school's higher ups, as it says that we need to request page unprotection in order to be able to edit it! We have numerous users here, and we require that we be able to use the IP address! Oh- and EVERYBODY is subject to our University's rules, whether you know it or not! Factchecker994 (talk) 14:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've CU blocked this sock account.-- Ponyobons mots 17:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: We students and faculty members cannot edit our IP address's talk page, if we try, we get the following message- " "This page is currently semi-protected so that only established, registered users can edit it." I myself am an established, registered user and yet I am unable to edit the talk page for some reason. As such, we CANNOT request this on our IP address talk page, because no one can edit it. If we could've done that, we wouldn't have needed to come here to do it! However, considering it also said "Request that the page's protection level be reduced.", and we are unable to edit anything due to that, I had no choice but to come here and request it- I hope you can understand! Factchecker994 (talk) 15:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- As you were told last time, your account does not meet the requirements for autoconfirmed yet (10+ edits and 4+ days). Be patient. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done: requester blocked, demonstrating that the protection was necessary. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:GS/RUSUKR. Curbon7 (talk) 04:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. An IP made a block evasion. CastJared (talk) 13:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. MaterialWorks (talk) 20:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
24 February 2023
Reason: Consistent vandalism, changing "soccer" to "football" against consensus. This is the third time asking. The changes are made again the moment protection was lifted: this change before even the bot removed the template. Requesting long term protection please. -- SuperJew (talk) 08:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. CastJared (talk) 13:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not ready to go indef yet. Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent target of IP vandalism. oknazevad (talk) 21:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 23:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration enforcement per WP:ARBPIA4. Clyde H. Mapping (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The page was literally created yesterday. There has not been any disruption so far. And if the idea is that there will be, we never do this on the expectation there will be. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 19:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Partial blocked /64 range. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the article before clearly had not vandalism, Please unblock it. NBAFAN1017 (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done This article has a long history of protection because of disruption; there's no reason to believe that it would not resume if the protection was lifted. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits/edit-warring in the lead by a series of IPs, one of which (130.223.161.94) has already been blocked, but disruption continues via others. (If relevant for context: IP edit-warring or vandalism in the lead have been intermittently recurring since September 2022, page was previously protected for this in October 2022.). R Prazeres (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs originating from Tunisia (maybe LTA as denoted by Magitroopa in this this diff however I'm not sure which LTA it belongs to) persisting adding promotional content linking to videos uploaded on probably their YouTube channel. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP and new account vandalism. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Last legitimate edit by Averixus May 2022. All intervening edits vandalism or reversion. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. MelanieN (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary full-protection - slow motion edit war that's sped up a bit as of late; none of the editors involved have touched the talk page from what I can see. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 18:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The last request was denied a few days ago because there was not enough activity, this page is still getting vandalized via doxxing, using unreliable news articles to post potentially private and/or unreliable information, particularly by user 2002:5969:DBA5:0:0:0:5969:DBA5 SturmFernmelder (talk) 01:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- I request for this to be reviewed as doxxing is still occuring. SturmFernmelder (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Anachronist, thank you for the protection, but could you please undo the last edit you made? It states "Zack Hoyt" for Asmongold, which comes from an unreliable news source that uses incorrect information (i.e. wrong birth date) and shouldn't be used to rely on the name, as there is no reliable source supporting it and Asmongold never confirmed his name, other than his first name, Zack. It would be great if it could be removed in order not to potentially dox him, as this may be private information that he wouldn't want to be shared, if it were his true name. SturmFernmelder (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotection. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 02:47, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Why should it be unprotected? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's a page about a city councilor in Chicago. This is not a high traffic article, there's practically no content disputes, and I'm the only person whose edited the article in like 2-years. I don't believe an extended confirmed protection is necessary. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 03:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- At the very least, it could be brought down to semi-protection. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 03:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's a page about a city councilor in Chicago. This is not a high traffic article, there's practically no content disputes, and I'm the only person whose edited the article in like 2-years. I don't believe an extended confirmed protection is necessary. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 03:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Then say so to start with next time. They don't like it when you don't say why. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected now. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry. Semsûrî (talk) 21:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. MelanieN (talk) 05:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Image-related vandalism from multiple accounts. Loafiewa (talk) 22:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 06:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP editing without talk page discussion. Zefr (talk) 23:18, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:47, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism, unsorced changes and fake box-office numbers after the end of the last protection (a few days ago)--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 00:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Continue vandalism in the page. Aldebaran69 (talk) 03:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent vandalism by LTA's. --Mtarch11 (talk) 05:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Create protection - persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gsthae with tempo!. Partofthemachine (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One blocked user has been adding edits that does not follow the neutral point of view. Now, at least 7 different IP addresses have been doing similar things that the blocked user has been doing. Layah50♪ ( 話して~! ) 07:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 07:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Baqotun0023 (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 07:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I have warned a Tunisian user to quit adding content from a translator and they wouldn't listen. It's been happening since August. I have corrected all major errors and those edits stood, with the warned Tunisian trying to put them back all the time. Nearly but not perfect (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- The user is حمد أمين الطرابلسي and they just love ignoring warnings. Request to block them as well, indefinitely. They edit warred with me before the World Cup last year on this page before finally agreeing to leave it the way I had it. Nearly but not perfect (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —ScottyWong— 06:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: Long-term sockpuppetry. 2803:C600:D102:CAB6:4195:3A82:33EB:6AAA (talk) 03:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done Already protected and disruptive editor blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Mobile editor keeps re-adding questionable info, without consensus GoodDay (talk) 05:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Mobile editor keeps re-adding questionable info, without consensus. GoodDay (talk) 05:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: She has intentionally, and through proxy, changed the page to include false narratives 209.202.206.122 (talk) 07:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done Request changes on the article's talk page. Anarchyte (talk) 07:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. A dynamic IP has been inserting incorrect information onto this page for years. There is an open invitation for this person to discuss their point of view on the talk page, which has not been adhered to. Instead, the user has turned to adding swear words to the page or threatening me. I've seen pages be indeffed for over a decade for reasons that were shorter-term and less WP:NOTHERE than this. Unknown Temptation (talk) 10:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Indefinite protection out lives its usefulness and results in people saying terrible things about the admin who did it, so -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopper edit warring to insert redundant and ungrammatical text. —Wasell(T) 🌻🇺🇦 11:52, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Has been semi protected for over 11 years. The admin that protected this page is no longer active. LibStar (talk) 03:56, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- The article has been protected multiple times for the exact same reason: BLP violations. Even though the most recent protecting admin isn't active, the other admins are. @Ged UK: @AlexiusHoratius: please give it a look. Possibly the news about her has died down enough that it's safe to unprotect. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protection might be an option then; if memory serves right, it didn't exist yet 11 years ago. Lectonar (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Last 50 edits span back to 2016. Probably safe to fully unprotect and see how it goes. Anarchyte (talk) 12:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protection might be an option then; if memory serves right, it didn't exist yet 11 years ago. Lectonar (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected – Favonian (talk) 12:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For about two weeks now, page has been consistently hit with an IP hopping anon who introduces deliberate factual errors via egg links. Millahnna (talk) 13:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Airtransat236 (talk | contribs) 14:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Breaktime in school somewhere. Lectonar (talk) 14:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 30 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. Two previous protections have expired. Jpatokal (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- List of Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir episodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent Disruptive edit. Yuugone (talk) 12:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:52, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Long term edit warring by IP users. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Disruptive editing WP:MOS WP:OVERLINK -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated Disruptive editing by IP and Newly-created Accounts. EnIRtpf09bchat with me 16:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 17:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued since unprotected, I doubt it will stop soon. Doug Weller talk 18:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Doom Patrol (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent edit warring from IP LibStar (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Disruption across numerous articles since January; rangeblocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:56, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since this is the first time this article has been protected, and the registered accounts used by the sockmaster have both been indeffed, and the socking has continued only with IPs, I do not see ECP as necessary at this time. Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 19:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple instances of vandalism due to ongoing controversy. >>> Extorc.talk 19:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how this works out. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism Kstern (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 21:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated block evasion / vandalism of this talk page. See Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive346#Persistent_removal_of_individual's_name_from_Talk:American_Academy_of_Dramatic_Arts for more info. MrOllie (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's been going on for a long time, so it would need a very long term talk page protection. Wouldn't archiving it so they don't see it anymore and think it's gone be more effective? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia must never be used and/or misused to harass anyone. Especially anonymous or non-notable individuals, or any person or individual of the private public at large. Edits constituting harassment such as the ones you have been making to harass RDJ, his cousin, who happens to also be his personal assistant, and other connected celebrities with this particular talk page. Your reverts, well over the three revert rule now, constitute harassment of this individual. Edits constituting harassment WILL BE REVERTED, DELETED, and EDITORS who engage in harassment are subject to BLOCKING AND BANNING.
- This WP: HA policy applies to ALL Wikipedia editors, and Wikipedia administrators who engage in harassment, as well.
- The harassment noted includes actions by a handful of Wikipedia editors calculated to be noticed by the target(s) and the specific named celebrities, and it IS clearly suggestive of targeting them, where no direct communication takes place with the non-noteworthy private individual, and the celebrities named in the discussion. Editors MrOllie and ElKevbo are guilty of harassment in this matter and their harassment continues unabated in violation of the Wikipedia policy WP: HA pertaining to harassment. Suggest blocking or banning user MrOllie and user ElKevbo.
- This particular individual and his name has been reverted/deleted under the WP: HA policy banning harassment. 98.103.125.160 (talk) 18:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC) 12.157.232.163 (talk) 18:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Discussion has now been archived. The archive may be more readily protected, should the need arise. Favonian (talk) 18:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of unregistered users (IP addresses) vandalism. I don't know if it's possible but I request a WP:SEMI because this type of vandalism "appears and disappears" in waves. Thank you. Blahhh23 (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs, rapid vandal edits. Schazjmd (talk) 22:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Arwel Parry. Favonian (talk) 22:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism 2A0E:3700:2093:3900:2083:E07E:EF9E:A752 (talk) 22:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Arwel Parry. Favonian (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Considering world events, it's probably best to protect this page. Estar8806 (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 22:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
25 February 2023
Reason: Vandalism. Fa7bardh (talk) 18:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like there's been much editing, let alone vandalism, in the last month or so. Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See page history. Super Ψ Dro 18:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like anything the editors are being overwhelmed by. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Both of them. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Create protection - repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine (talk) 22:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Officialzil.xdonzil.x (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. Recreated once, and by the same user. Protection should only be used when blocks aren't viable (see first paragraph of WP:PROT). Sdrqaz (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism (IP repeatedly changing the text to say the opposite of the sources used for the sentence.) Jeppiz (talk) 00:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 203.17.70.53 (talk · contribs). Sdrqaz (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and persistent IP vandalism. Tails Wx 00:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by an editor using different accounts and IP addresses. ElKevbo (talk) 03:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some reluctance given talkpage. Hopefully this short protection is enough. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – look at this complete mess of an edit history. FMSky (talk) 06:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent removal of birth name contrary to policy. Lard Almighty (talk) 06:45, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level IP vandalism Dippiljemmy (talk) 00:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Already semi. 2001:8003:3C07:AD00:19B2:4C02:1EB8:3CF6 (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary block (week/month) due to ip edit warring. Wolbo (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 11:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry on a semi-protected FA; this year alone, it has happened five times as seen here, here, here, here, and here. Wow (talk) 01:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: I don't like doing this. ECP goes in a report to WP:AN. Any admin can undo this if they don't like it too. Will need SP reset. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Swiatek is really popular with her win streak, No 1 status and in another final tomorrow. The Polish IP keep removing or adding content over the last week. Can we get a week of semi or maybe ECP protection to see if it dies down?. Fyunck(click) (talk) 02:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent vandalism Festucalex (talk) 12:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent recreation of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 12:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent long-term disruptive editing by unrepentant sockpuppeteer Belteshazzar. I suggest a reasonably long period of protection this time given that previous short periods have not been enough to discourage him. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- The "disruptive edits" are only fixing clear mistakes and removing highly subjective phrasing. Note that the cited source indicates that Ingram was promoted to Major in 1995, yet you keep restoring the version that says 1996. 89.17.214.10 (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- That is a lie. You are making major edits to an article using a proxy IP address after having had many other accounts and IP addresses blocked. You are de-facto banned from editing. Your behaviour is not innocuous and you must know that by now. This isn't just a date change and is it blatantly dishonest to pretend otherwise. DanielRigal (talk) 16:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- The date change is an example. The bigger issues are fairly straightforward, and no one has offered a substantive objection, yet you keep reverting just because. 89.17.214.10 (talk) 16:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- He was right about a single date being wrong which I have corrected but the other stuff he was claiming is wrong. He is being dishonest with some his editing, he may find one mistake on an entire article but then he makes major changes which are not supported by references and marks his edit summaries incorrectly. I have noticed a pattern with this. I agree that the behaviour is not innocuous. Thankfully the article has now been locked so he cannot edit it. Psychologist Guy (talk) 16:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- The date change is an example. The bigger issues are fairly straightforward, and no one has offered a substantive objection, yet you keep reverting just because. 89.17.214.10 (talk) 16:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- That is a lie. You are making major edits to an article using a proxy IP address after having had many other accounts and IP addresses blocked. You are de-facto banned from editing. Your behaviour is not innocuous and you must know that by now. This isn't just a date change and is it blatantly dishonest to pretend otherwise. DanielRigal (talk) 16:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: A small group of individuals involved in arbitration (because a research paper alleges manipulation and lies) are the primary editors of this topic. In my opinion the arbitration needs to resolve itself to conclusion while the editors in question should be recusing themselves. To be mentioned in an external research paper for promulgating falsehoods creates a conflict of interest that needs to be recognized as it calls into question the credibility of the platform. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case Flibbertigibbets (talk) 02:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- If the Arbs wish to issue such an injunction, they will. I will not take an action that might get me dragged into this case for taking sides. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. If it's directly related to the arbitration case, you could ask ArbCom to make a temporary injuction to this effect. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 04:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Question: Is the only current dispute the rapper/criminal ordering in the lead? If so this is more of a content dispute than a BLP issue, and doesn't warrant page protection. As an aside please also the approaching 3RR. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. NSW has an election coming up on 23 March so maybe protect it for a while because if he becomes the next Premier then vandalism will only increase. 2001:8003:3C07:AD00:19B2:4C02:1EB8:3CF6 (talk) 13:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism. Election coming up soon (see above) and Perrottet is the current Premier. 2001:8003:3C07:AD00:19B2:4C02:1EB8:3CF6 (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant spam by socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Syntaktis123. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Might want to protect this for a little while. There's been a recent controversy, and a fair bit of IP vandalism (including some that involve BLPvio). DFlhb (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Currently salted, but would be useful as a category redirect to Category:Feces. Zerbu 💬 19:58, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: When I submitted this using the request unprotection form, it added this page to the category instead of adding a link in the title.
I'veFavonian has fixed it, but it may be a good idea for an interface admin to update the code to prevent this from occuring when nominating categories. Zerbu 💬 20:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)- Not to steal your thunder, Zerbu, but it was this tiny bit of magic that did the trick. It's also helpful if you ever wish to link to an image rather than include it. Favonian (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oops, I didn't notice it was already fixed, I was going to fix it myself, but you beat me to it. I've updated my comment accordingly. Zerbu 💬 20:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done I can't think of any possible non-disruptive uses for such a category. Salvio giuliano 15:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by adding unsourced claims to the article. The article was already page-protected in the past. I’m asking for temporary protection. Sricsi (talk) 11:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: I found this edit highly convincing -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Disruptive editing is ongoing from another IP. I’m asking for page protection to prevent this. Sricsi (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This is an article about Albanian noblewoman Voisava Kastrioti. Serbian nationalists are claiming her origin as being Serbian without any solid proof, as her origin is unclear. This article needs to be protected and only sourced information to be included in it. IEstiv03 (talk) 15:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: I think Jingiby has fixed the problem. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Vanjagenije. Favonian (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: ECP expired yesterday, and since then there has been some vandalism, but more importantly it's a very high-visibility page that WP:GS/RUSUKR revolves around. AE is exempt from the no-preemptive-protection rule, right? Heavy Water (talk) 17:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: regular admin action -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The article is consistently changed and many texts already have been removed so far.Ricky.hes (talk) 17:39, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ricky.hes: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent additions of incorrect/undetermined claims that US was behind the sabotage. Initially by a new editor (who is now participating on talk page of the sabotage article), now by anonymous editors. – robertsky (talk) 17:45, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: There is no reason as to why a page that is barely checked in a year is receiving confirmed edit protection, apart from that the article currently isn't even a dispute point for which it has its security increased hence it is illogical for a page to recieve such protocol when other deserving pages like Sindhis, Kashmiris and Saraikis have no additional protection. Starkex (talk) 17:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done The lack of protection on other pages is not a valid rationale here. The upgraded protection was applied recently after renewed disruption, and there is a long history of protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple new and IP editors adding fake/unsourced jobs to a footballer's BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 18:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC):
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continuously adding unsourced content (and deleting sources) from an IP hopper. Mike Allen 19:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No need for non-auto confirmed editors to edit this page. Moxy- 21:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
26 February 2023
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Posting unverified hoax information. Myrabert01 (talk) 03:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing much, if anything. Daniel Case (talk) 22:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism of trying to remove/downplay Gunderson's status as a conspiracy theorist since at least October 2022. 2001:999:788:14CA:5D0A:1AC6:1C98:B3D8 (talk) 11:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- This possibly falls under the post-1992 Arbcom enforcement. 2001:8003:3C07:AD00:19B2:4C02:1EB8:3CF6 (talk) 13:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in last two days, and nothing for most of this month before that. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing today, and seems like nothing too frequent before that. Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: It's a highly visible template. (The template was renamed, which resulted in being no longer protected.) Janhrach (talk) 21:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Protection settings are carried over with page moves. Favonian (talk) 21:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent events with the war are bringing in a bunch of disruption. HappyWith (talk) 00:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for a month. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting permanent semi-protection due to persistent vandalism by an anonymous editor (possibly a group) who has been jumping from IPs and throwaway accounts to blank the article. Blanking has been going on since June 2022 and the vandalism immediately resumed on a near-daily basis after the temporary semi-protection expired. In my opinion it is pointless to have editors revert article blanks and restore, review, etc. again and again when the simplest solution is to restore the protection on a permanent basis. Yue🌙 00:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 190.43.228.182 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Since protection expired on 3 February, it's been blanked twice, with the culprit being the same IP both times. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors edit-warring. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for a month. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Despite there not having been any new sources to reflect a more-current store count than the one from April 2022, various IPs nonetheless keep trying to update it to a more current count in a way not supported by the existing source. (Semi-protection might not necessarily be enough; even during the last semi-protection these changes were still being made.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: doubled previous duration -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Edit warring / content dispute. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism followed by same vandalism by a dubious account. Extended confirmed protection is needed. Mhhossein talk 06:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism/disruptive editing. Cinderella157 (talk) 07:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism as we look on the edit history of the corresponding article Abhishek K Menon (talk) 07:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Steady IP vandalism regarding the Airlines and Destinations table.
Der HON (talk) 09:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: protection expired a couple of weeks ago -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 12:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: 7 day protection - fight is today and there's lots of IP vandalism --- Tbf69 P • T 13:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Very high level of IP vandalism with the same pattern: Removing the same sourced routes again and again without a comment by similar IP ranges.
Der HON (talk) 14:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: warned user -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Very high level of IP vandalism with the same pattern: Removing the same sourced routes again and again without a comment by similar IP ranges.
Der HON (talk) 14:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent, repeated vandalism from multiple IPs and newly registered users over the course of recent months. —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP vandalism going back to at least early November. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Edits to the page since May 2022 have almost entirely been vandalism and vandalism reverting, since the page is pretty much to the fullest extent it can be for a list. Johnson524 (Talk!) 16:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 1keyhole (talk) 16:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 16:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Nigerian election results have not been announced yet but multiple IP editors changing this BLP to declare Obi the winner. Schazjmd (talk) 16:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. --- Tbf69 P • T 16:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Not even a day after the previous extended confirmed protection was lifted, the article is still seeing cases of disruptive editing. Requesting further extended confirmed protection. HackerKnownAs (talk) 17:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Delibarate attempts for vandalization. We already applied a page-protection for the "Prisoner (Miley Cyrus song)" article because of the same activity by probably the same IP users. Sricsi (talk) 10:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I cannot do this without noting that it probably would be better for the IP user to actually cite some of those reviews if they insist on that wording. Their failure to do so is the only reason I have protected this page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Sockpuppetry and vandalism 79.134.184.168 (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enough for it to get off the Main Page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Approximately 38 reversions in the last 100 edits. Drain on editor time. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: let me know if vandalism recurs -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /24 1 month-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism. Ranadhira (talk) 10:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One instance of disruptive editing in the last 24 hours against almost no edits this month does not, to me, reach a "high" level. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism after recent protection expiry Jguglielmin (talk) 19:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 65.95.142.190 (talk · contribs) blocked by Acroterion. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of incorrect edits. JMHamo (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Special:PermaLink/1138039039#Jack Champion, there continues to be repeated attempts to add unsourced BLP content to this article. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
27 February 2023
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 23:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Obvious COI. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 01:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. delicate situation, needs to be discussed on talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotection: Change into template disambig for the country and the us state. 26zhangi (talk) 20:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Do we do template disambigs? I don't see anything in policy at help:template or wp:disambig, so I would be inclined to decline this request, based on the problems that let to the mass deletion of this template and others. Still, willing to hear another admin on if we do disambigs, as templates are not where I usually work. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- As far as I know template disambiguations isn't a thing. It'd be better to add hatnotes to both template pages (state and country) pointing to the other. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 22:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- There are some at Category:Template disambiguation pages, although they don't seem to be very common. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- As far as I know template disambiguations isn't a thing. It'd be better to add hatnotes to both template pages (state and country) pointing to the other. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 22:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined as inappropriate for this venue. Given that there was a lot of controversy with the deletion last time, there needs to be an RFC on whether or not this disambig is needed. A single admin shouldn't overrule a deletion and salting discussion unilaterally unless it is blindly obvious. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: No more edit . Edits on page is finished . Rahul Jadaun (talk) 03:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- That isn't how this works, and in any event this is the English-language Wikipedia. Administrators here cannot help with Hindi Wikipedia-related requests. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 03:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Out of our scope here, no page with that name on EN-Wikipedia. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: No more edits is require . Rahul Jadaun (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Once again, that isn't how this works. See WP:Protection policy. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 07:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: This page requires more information.Information provided in this page is wrong and defame a specific caste . Rahul Jadaun (talk) 03:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- This article is in a contentious topic - one you likely should not be anywhere near given your post here. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 03:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page.. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flare-up of LTA activity. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 05:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection - threats by IP users to keep adding content that is grossly at odds with WP:BLP - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pam_Hupp&diff=prev&oldid=1141786643 McPhail (talk) 09:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: I do not respond well to threats. Sometimes, they lead to promises. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Article gets two ongoing types of IP edit, and not much else: accurate updates to his current wealth, but also vandalism to say that he's not actually the richest man in the world. Belbury (talk) 10:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Long term problems with this page. There have been virtually no edits by new users or IPs which have not been reverted for being either BLP violations or advertising/whitewashing. The page was previously protected on a few occasions, and there really doesn't seem to be much (or any) benefit in allowing new users and IPs to edit this page. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 10:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: starting at the bottom -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: reinstate previous duration -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC):
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Within the past week, anon editor(s) in 2001:44b8:111f:8a00::/64 regularly truncating full article link 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre to 1989 Tiananmen Square protests. First instance from this IP range occurred in January. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 22:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 00:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Long enough to curb the problem through the actual event occurring. Courcelles (talk) 14:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 02:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems to be the result of a single fight causing the problem, should be forgotten about by then and folks moved on to the next thing. Courcelles (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 13:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 13:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP 3x yesterday. Lectonar (talk) 13:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP Vandalism RowanJ LP (talk) 02:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Seems to have died down, too. Lectonar (talk) 13:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs as Eurovision season has started and selection controversies keep arising. Please protect the page until the end of May. Blue Edits (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of May 31, 2023, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Change the age of Tahnee Harrison from 18 to 14 Arielislove (talk) 02:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Source? (I should note the source presently cited there is 404-compliant.) —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 03:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Remember to include a reliable source for the information. Favonian (talk) 13:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Event is recent, might get vandalized with unsourced content 176.237.10.171 (talk) 05:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: So far, so good. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Recent event, page well watched. Disruption still manageable. Lectonar (talk) 14:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism by IP hopper. BattleshipMan (talk) 06:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Yikes. Cannot tell good from bad. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Incognito and IP accounts are edit warring amidst a debate about this article's subject. Proposing Extended Confirmed Protection so that users not logged in and those with a new account may not edit it, and the argument is redirected to the Talk Page. RobotGoggles (talk) 13:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined Edit warring ended about 4 days ago; no disruption after that. Lectonar (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Lectonar There's a persistent socking from a single sock [28] — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, they are blocked now. Lectonar (talk) 14:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Lectonar There's a persistent socking from a single sock [28] — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See log. Editorkamran (talk) 16:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Creation protected indefinitely. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Already done. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Birth year is continuously being charged by multiple users without a source. adriana 💌 17:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Someone keeps making unconstructive edits, and there is a high level of vandalism. 99.209.40.250 (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of IP vandalism. DDMS123 (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive IP hopper is adding Polish text to the page. In addition, it also adds unsourced claims. – sbaio 16:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP the last days, not warned yet. Lectonar (talk) 16:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. In full, for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Administrators please protect this page with Indefinite Extended Confirmed Protection as several newly made editors and IP users are doing Unconstructive edits on it since the previous Protection expired. They are editing this page like a personal blog spot or fan page sometimes by adding detailed plot which crosses word limit sometimes by removing/adding/changing cast sequence which was done according to original broadcast. Pri2000 (Pri2000) 19:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. for three days, in full. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced information to article over long-term period of time. livelikemusic (TALK!) 19:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Here we go again... WP:NOTAFORUM disruption resumed after previous protection expired. Just why do IPs/newly registered users think this is the actual ChatGPT? Zoe Trent Fan🎤💍 19:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent target of sockfarm. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 19:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
28 February 2023
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP address keeps making disruptive edits. Layah50♪ ( 話して~! ) 18:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Courcelles (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in two days. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruption by IPs. StephenMacky1 (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2A00:23A8:D46:8601:1D54:CF2F:867B:B133 (talk) 16:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Checking to see if protection is necessary. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Now this is odd. The only edits from today are from the requester and they are highly suspect -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 22:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: In response to recent reports from the US intel community, the talk page has seen increased IP disruption. This includes sarcastic WP:POINTy comments, like [29] and [30]. While Talk protection is rare, requesting a temporary semi-protection or similar of the page to limit the disruption on what's already a difficult and contentious topic covered under sanctions, until the topic of the day moves on. Bakkster Man (talk) 22:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP hasn't edited in a few hours, and it was just one. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, allegations of criminality (BLP violations) for this controversial and polarising subject. CT55555(talk) 03:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is only the second time it's been protected; we're not going to indef ECP yet Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Here, an IP has added a class of very rare altered edits, it says in the summary of edits that included photos of the corporate offices and asked a class of questions on the discussion page of another IP about why the Crunchyroll website (the streaming service) was removed from both the infobox and external links when mixing with numerous competitors (section below) since it merged in mid-March 2022, almost barely a year since it began to consolidate into Crunchyroll itself. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 05:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: Wut? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Question: And why do you want the page protected? Lectonar (talk) 14:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- For this, it has partially reverted to the old edition to be able to migrate the bit of history from the Crunchyroll article, the recently merged streaming service and now it sounds confusing to me that it has the same owner with Sony if instead Funimation is still owned by Sony Corporation of America with a joint venture with Sony Pictures Television and Aniplex's Japanese subsidiary in the United States also owned by Sony. And it gets confused by placing the Crunchyroll website both in the infobox and external links. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 14:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've gone cross-eyed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- And have you protected the page yet? 179.52.223.99 (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like you want your edits protected and your edits are being reverted by @FilmandTVFan28:. So maybe this is a content dispute and needs discussion on the talk page. I will defer to @Lectonar: or another RfPP reviewer, but I do not see the need. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- I just replied on my discussion page to the user here It is that I did not disrupt the edition on the Funimation page, in fact, I restored this confusion of Sony and Sony Pictures properties instead of saying that this is the current owner of Sony Pictures Television since 2017. Not Crunchyroll which is currently owned by Sony Group Corporation and Sony Pictures are different things. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- I reverted this edit. I already archived the links. CastJared (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- But I don't see this change to the point where I restore this confusion. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Or yet. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- But I don't see this change to the point where I restore this confusion. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- I reverted this edit. I already archived the links. CastJared (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- I just replied on my discussion page to the user here It is that I did not disrupt the edition on the Funimation page, in fact, I restored this confusion of Sony and Sony Pictures properties instead of saying that this is the current owner of Sony Pictures Television since 2017. Not Crunchyroll which is currently owned by Sony Group Corporation and Sony Pictures are different things. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like you want your edits protected and your edits are being reverted by @FilmandTVFan28:. So maybe this is a content dispute and needs discussion on the talk page. I will defer to @Lectonar: or another RfPP reviewer, but I do not see the need. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- And have you protected the page yet? 179.52.223.99 (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've gone cross-eyed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- For this, it has partially reverted to the old edition to be able to migrate the bit of history from the Crunchyroll article, the recently merged streaming service and now it sounds confusing to me that it has the same owner with Sony if instead Funimation is still owned by Sony Corporation of America with a joint venture with Sony Pictures Television and Aniplex's Japanese subsidiary in the United States also owned by Sony. And it gets confused by placing the Crunchyroll website both in the infobox and external links. 179.52.223.99 (talk) 14:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined The incident was days ago; there a hints of an underlying disagreement over content. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing going back serval months, an IP user keeps changing the film's writing credits in the infobox without providing any reliable source. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2603:8080:E700:2A95:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For two years. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Persistent BLP violations concerning amount of children from several IP's, probably the same person. TylerBurden (talk) 06:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Robyndahiya (talk) 04:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: to prevent vandalism Robyndahiya (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: to prevent vandalism Robyndahiya (talk) 04:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: to prevent vandalism Robyndahiya (talk) 04:14, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Unhelpful edits by IP users while there is a open discussion about the disputed content on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling#Elimination Chamber as an accomplishment. Mann Mann (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: I EW warned the one from today. They seem intent on a block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 09:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: to prevent vandalism Robyndahiya (talk) 04:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: to prevent vandalism Robyndahiya (talk) 04:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: For disruptive editing, IPs keep adding unsourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: doubled previous duration -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: 4 separate IP vandals (probably the same person) in the last month all surrounding the same general vandalism concept. Requesting pending changes for 3 months. Elijahandskip (talk) 05:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Note: SP one week by Materialscientist -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Obvious COI. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 07:52, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 12:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock and now IP socks of Eswaran Naveen targeting article. Ravensfire (talk) 04:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Gotitbro (talk) 10:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: From the AFD archives, July 2009; via User:JPxG/Oracle/Largest AfDs. Redirect target (which mentions the three subjects in question): Jackson family#Third generation. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 04:51, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected here, Sdrqaz (talk) 13:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry, IP socks of MakaveliReed keep making unconstructive edits in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There is currently some back and forth edit warring in the last few days. Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 14:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:52, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – May need a temp protection since anonymous users keep saying Sizemore has died when he hasn't (officially). Mike Allen 15:06, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A cast of IPs have been changing away from Martin's preferred pronouns and adding "female" to the short description (Martin is non-binary). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of vandalism/disruptive edits surrounds changing his name or adding content around him being "Uncle Howdy" and looks like it started back in December so requesting two month protection. S0091 (talk) 17:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 15:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done Not a good use of protection. User has been given a final warning for WP:WEBHOST. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: The pronouns of a non-binary character have repeatedly been changed by IP users in violation of MOS:NB. They attempt to hide it as "fixing grammatical errors" or "grammatical corrections". Patlut (talk) 15:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That was the first edit since July of 2022, and the IP hasn't even been warned yet. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:52, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Two improper moves within 6 days of each other. Felt some short temporary protection might be in order to keep the article stable. -. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:50, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Which should be enough time to let everyone have a proper RM discussion. Courcelles (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP sockpuppets of Belteshazzar are targeting this article again. I suggest a longer period of semi-protection. DanielRigal (talk) 18:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Please protect Hera Pheri 3 (talk) 04:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- That article is already create protected, and has been for years. What are you proposing be done here? Courcelles (talk) 14:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please create a sourced version of this article in a subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any administrator to move the page for you. (Largely for the bot, but also general advice.) Courcelles (talk) 14:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)