Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2017/04

2017

01 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs constantly adding unsourced content to the article in question. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's April Fools and a string of (related? meat puppets? socks?) IPs are reverting/vandalizing to the same preferred content. Shearonink (talk) 17:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Lectonar (talk) 21:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template none.

Edit requests are ignored, or incorrectly handled by editors ignorant of Wikipedia requirements for citable information and of the topic.

Article is in bad shape.

Admin who did protection level ignored request to reduce protection level.

2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:C3 (talk) 22:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is semi-protected, not full protected. I recommend 2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:C3|2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:C3 to register an account and improve the article - it is a common vandalism target, and thus unprotection would be unproductive. Materialscientist (talk) 23:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may be personally biased against IP editors, but they are allowed on Wikipedia. The semi protection policy is failed. Edit requests are ignored or dismissed by editors who don't know a thing about the topic or that encyclopedias require reliable sources.
Maybe you are the one who added the unsourced statement on the ultramicroscope, maybe your grandfather invented it, and knowing how little attention this article gets your blocking IP edits keeps your misinformation in the article.
No, Wikipedia editors bully each other, and spend little time editing, this is an example, you could have responded to the edit requests instead of trying to revert me, you could have responded to me on your talk page, but nothing but policy chat and throwing walls of text at suspected newbie editors seems to be done on Wikipedia anymore.
I want to improve the article, not throw my weight around to prevent IP editors from improving it. It would have taken you less time to remove ultramicroscope from the intro than to post here, after reverting my edit request, after ignoring me in your talk page. You're a registered user, and you don't care about the quality of the article.
No. The article needs edited. Wikipedia doesn't need more socializers. It needs editors. --2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:9D (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:9D: You can also create an account and change what you don't like about the failed protection policy. Cheers, Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 00:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Right, thanks for not reading anything I said, which seems to be the other aspect of nouveaux Wikipedia, everyone just talks at each other about policy, no one edits any articles. You could have responded to edit requests and fixed articles. But, no, no time for that, when you can throw in a comment on policy that shows you don't even read what is there, just add to the talk. But thanks for proving my point. --2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:9D (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, it has been two years. I see there was a lot of protection applied to it, but do we really want such a vital article semiprotected infinitely? I don't know if I agree with that. Maybe we can try alternating un/protection for a few months...? I'll try to keep an eye on it, for my part. Please think it over, Materialscientist. El_C 04:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism subsides around summer. We are not there yet, but you can try unprotecting. Materialscientist (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be inclined to put that under pending changes-protection for...let's say three months to evaluate the amount of disruption caused. Easier to just accept or revert a pending revision, too, instead of having to process an edit request. Would that be a way forward? And I will watchlist. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly reverts are easier than edits, MS reverted me in a blink of an eye, but ignored all my edit requests, as did everyone. No one on Wikipedia is improving this article, while stale misinformation has been spread all over the web from it. It's time to remove the misinformation from Wikipedia and to source real information. I don't know what pending changes is, though. If it requires input from other users it will fail. The edit requests on this article are being ignored or mishandled, and pending changes would suffer the same fate. --2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:9D (talk) 08:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:PC, which is a good idea, actually. Wikipedia is all about input from other users, IP. Thanks, Materialscientist. Okay, unprotected and placed under pending changes for three months. We'll see how it goes. Hope for the best. 'Knock on James Woods, et cetera! El_C 14:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If pending changes are ignored like edit requests are, you've changed nothing, just put the edits in a different category where inputs are still not improving the article. The problem is no one is editing the article to fix it. I'm willing to do that, but, instead of doing that, I've joined the majority of Wikipedia talking about policy and doing nothing to improve an article. Or edit requests are, and now, probably pending changes will be, dealt with by editors who don't know Wikipedia requires reliable resources.
I don't see how recategorizing edit requests helps. --2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:9D (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I just got my changes thoroughly rejected by someone who thinks scanning electron microscopes record their reflected electron beam to create an image (not e3ven the Wikipedia article on them says that brain buster), and imagines the word "ultramicroscope" elsewhere in the article. --2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:9D (talk) 16:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, the "someone" in this message is me and everything after the word "who" is false. Given that this editor thinks the best way to improve this article is to pick fights, violate WP:NPA, tell lies, and edit war, I strongly oppose removing PC protection. CityOfSilver 16:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do you see the word "ultramicroscope" anywhere else in the article? Do you have a single source that says an SEM acts by imaging its reflected electron beam? This is anti-science or something going on. --2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:9D (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Everything I've done regarding your edits has been in response to your completely inappropriate behavior. Nothing I've done has been in response to your changes to the content. This is not an appropriate location for content discussions. Please stop leaving messages like this here. CityOfSilver 16:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're editing the article as a form of coercion? That's creepy. --2600:387:6:80D:0:0:0:9D (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done de-semied and placed under pending-changes protection for 3 months. Please discuss the rest somewhere else. Lectonar (talk) 20:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – We have 2 new editors edit waring back and forth. If I'm not mistaken this article has a one revert rule. Moxy (talk) 15:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I have warned both editors about the edit warring. If this continues i suggest taking it to WP:3RRN. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from 2A02:C7D:ADE4:8900 IPv6 range. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 18:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 19:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. Since this is a featured article, it must be permanently semi-protected like Kolkata to avoid IP vandalism. Many times, disruptive edits by IPs take long to be detected since this article is very long. Vibhss (talk) 19:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 19:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BilCat (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 19:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request full protection do to constant editwarring to add disputed material. The user(s) trying to add the material are refusing to discuss it on the talk page. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @Argento Surfer: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Declined. There's no reason for full protection. The disruption is coming from socks, both of which are now blocked. There might be a need for semi-protection in case there is more socking, but in my view, we haven't reached that point yet.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 13:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recurring vandalism by adding unsourced information Jbindoma (talk) 11:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC). Jbindoma (talk) 11:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 13:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of content by IP, and IP was given notices. User probably also edits from this IP as well. Thomson200 (talk) 17:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple new users and IP addresses vandalising the article. -=Troop=- (talk) 17:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An individual or group of individuals, including two registered accounts and an IP user, continually make edits with no source or an unreliable source. Semi-protection would, at the very least, force them to use their account(s), enabling a level of accountability. ALPolitico (talk) 15:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Current edit warring and other problematic edits; variable 45.247.*.* IPs involved. Dl2000 (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NPalgan2 (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Mass reversions by IP despite reasons provided and WP:NOR violation. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 15:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should deal with the IP's. I have issued warnings to the others and posted a strongly worded warning on the talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism especially unsourced information Jbindoma (talk) 11:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC) . Jbindoma (talk) 11:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of disruptive editing from page's latest year-long block. Continued removal of mass-content without support of sourced support, and is borderlining fancruft editing by anonymous editors. Page continues to receive long-term blocks, due to these types of edits, and I believe an indefinite protection will help forgo this type of disruptiveness. livelikemusic talk! 12:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Go with another year. El_C 13:45, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two registered users revert-warring. No attempt to take it to talk. I am gong to initiate a talk page discussion, but, since this has been effectively being waged since February, a day or two's FP would probably help this process. — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 13:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: OR policy violations – Consistent restoration of unsourced information that has been discussed on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9), has been going on for months before third party agreed that it violated said policy. Oath2order (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: OR policy violations – Consistent restoration of unsourced information that has been discussed on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9), has been going on for months before third party agreed that it violated said policy. Oath2order (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: OR policy violations – Consistent restoration of unsourced information that has been discussed on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9), has been going on for months before third party agreed that it violated said policy. Oath2order (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: OR policy violations – Consistent restoration of unsourced information that has been discussed on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9), has been going on for months before third party agreed that it violated said policy. Oath2order (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: OR policy violations – Consistent restoration of unsourced information that has been discussed on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9), has been going on for months before third party agreed that it violated said policy. Oath2order (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: OR policy violations – Consistent restoration of unsourced information that has been discussed on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9), has been going on for months before third party agreed that it violated said policy. Oath2order (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: OR policy violations – Consistent restoration of unsourced information that has been discussed on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9), has been going on for months before third party agreed that it violated said policy. Oath2order (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: OR policy violations – Consistent restoration of unsourced information that has been discussed on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9), has been going on for months before third party agreed that it violated said policy. Oath2order (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: OR policy violations – Consistent restoration of unsourced information that has been discussed on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9), has been going on for months before third party agreed that it violated said policy. Oath2order (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 08:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Almost all of my contributions are being reverted by one editor. I have asked for help within Wikipedia without resolve. StephenTS42 (talk) 15:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I believe this should be moved to AN3. Also possible forum shopping of the article. —JJBers 16:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Defense Rebuttal: The editor above this comment is the reason for this request. Has gone so far as to invade and vandalize my sandbox. An now this editor is leaving rash, unreasonable and false accusations here. I don't know what forum shopping is. Please help! Thank you!——→StephenTS42 (talk) 21:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please use diffs to prove claims of vandalism—that's a serious accusation—and generally pay attention to what is linked for you in replied text. Otherwise, please pursue dispute resolution: such as Third opinion, Dispute Resolution Noticeboard, or other dispute resolution options. Thanks. El_C 22:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In response to the sandbox issue, I attempted to add "nocat" to a template for userpages in the user-sandbox. I quickly self-reverted it, but the edit was reverted by the user, before blanking the page. (Diffs: original edit self-revert revert back blanking of page.) —JJBers 23:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Diff between two numbered versions of StephenTS42 sandbox——StephenTS42 (talk) 02:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone please close this, or do something about this discussion, this is thing above isn't even related to the article at all.—JJBers 02:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Per AI website, the total number of ATR 72 is just 5 [1]. Some IPs keep changing it to 8.  LeoFrank  Talk 18:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: this link states they have 8 of that aircraft. Has there been an effort to discuss which reference is the most suitable? Mifter (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple I.P.s are edit warring with users in reference to the "official name". One user has posted on the talk page, the I.P.s have refused to comment there and instead engage in an edit war. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 04:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The editor who has reported this has been just as guilty of edit warring and non-participation in Talk so I think that it needs to be full protection, mutual blocks, or mutual warnings. ElKevbo (talk) 04:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The only difference is I've reverted it twice, the I.P. has been doing this for multiple days. My only reason is that the original version should be used until a consensus by the other two (the main arguers here) or others can come to a consensus. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 06:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Actually not enough disruption for semi-protection. Find other venues, and actually find multiple reliable sources concerning the official name. Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent IP vandal (over 3 months) keeps deleting the Mac OS platform because "it hasn't been released yet". Has now started deleting references to the release window as well. Previous protection expired and removal activity returned. Requesting pending changes protection, to minimise impact on other IP users X201 (talk) 09:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:COPYVIO from a dynamic IP. Copyvio is from http://www.aminoapps.com/page/anime/2230323/when-supernatural-battles-became-commonplace. —Farix (t | c) 01:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 03:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Marking again, for the bot. Vanamonde (talk) 09:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's time for some long-lasting protection to be applied to this page. Enough is enough, the vandalism/edit warring is constant. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 01:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - Multiple I.P.s edit warring with users in reference to infobox. Quentin X (talk) 06:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of the deletion sockpuppet vandal. Recommend as long a protection as possible, and to keep an eye on related articles. Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 07:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection - PC would also work Persistent vandalism – Ip vandal returns just after protection expires. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 00:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh... A big deal of his occupations being removed that are not needed, give me a break... 2600:1000:B006:1782:7CE0:A7A4:C30D:34F6 (talk) 00:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already explain it too you about it, but you refuse. "Actor" already cover his voice over work, you have such a big issue over it and I don't know what your problem "IS" about it? 174.192.11.93 (talk) 01:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 02:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Consistent restoration of contested date of birth unsourced by IP editors in violation of BLP despite no-wiki warning in text and talk page post. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc (open channel) 16:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is at WP:ANI. NeilN talk to me 20:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – starting to get harassed a bit by an IP @ their Aaron Swartz-article vandalism. Shearonink (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 03:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 01:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:22, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced material. Page has been semi-protected previously but disruptive behaviour is continuing. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 02:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lookin' like quite a bit of vandalism from a bunch of folks lately. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an unregistered 5.172.255.188. My request for a discussion on the talk page was refused. Oliszydlowski (TALK) 19:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent WP:BLOCKEVASION by User:Cebr1979. Sro23 (talk) 23:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistant IP vandalism. BangJan1999 (talk) 23:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – two weeks may be enough. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 18:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Emphrase - 💬 | 📝 18:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant reverting sourced and cited info with personal opinions. TropicAces (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

02 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent WP:EL violations from a hopping IP. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:35, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I don't understand. What's the problem with linking to IMDB? El_C 05:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Procedural Lectonar (talk) 16:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent WP:EL violations from a hopping IP. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: IP hopping notwithstanding, it appears to be a content dispute. IP wants the website to be titled more at length. El_C 05:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Procedural Lectonar (talk) 16:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent WP:EL violations from a hopping IP. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Why not try to use the article talk pages, in all these instances? IPs are allowed to disagree with registered users and still receive equal treatment. El_C 05:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Procedural Lectonar (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being persistently targeted with homophobic trolling from a new single-issue account. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection IP's keep vandalizing the page. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 17:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. A Great Catholic Person (talk) 18:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator NeilN. Mifter (talk) 19:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. --Lanwi1 (talk) 18:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by socks of Itskumudhk.  LeoFrank  Talk 17:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 01:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mifter: The IP sock is back again.  LeoFrank  Talk 06:30, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 06:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: It just looks like the user has used a different IP [2].  LeoFrank  Talk 15:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by UK-based IP hopper who thinks an April Fool's article is real. Areaseven (talk) 15:42, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  15:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism.  AxG /   15:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as The Grand Tour (TV series), this article is facing persistent vandalism by a UK-based IP-hopper who thinks an April Fool's article is real. Areaseven (talk) 15:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  15:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: vandalism. I was adding sources to the article when I noticed some false entries, most characterized by someone sneaking in changing Wisconsin to from milk to beer and then using a source that said milk. I don't know how long that went unnoticed. Removed out right entries that were clearly false rather than changing the ref and claim like Maine that was based on an prank that when it got on the article became essentially an advert. Also there has been a small uptick in unregistered users vandalizing the page with false info (with no sources of course).FusionLord (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 17:39, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Orchomen. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen and User:Amaury/List of accounts and IPs used by Orchomen. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Is under heavy attack from an anonymous editor who is obsessed with inserting antisemitic trash while attacking good editors. I reported them to AN3 but when things like this happen, the more reports the merrier. CityOfSilver 04:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 04:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism by IPs of an Important article . Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Was recently unprotected from a vandalism-protection, instantly re-received vandalism. Lordtobi () 08:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 09:15, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed Persistent sockpuppetry (see Iloveartrock (talk · contribs)) --Ilovetopaint (talk) 16:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. - some semi protected, I agree that the pages there were not do not merit protection at this time. Mifter (talk) 01:13, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done I've semi-protected the remaining page for a week, as it seemed to me that it required it. Vanamonde (talk) 06:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New Jersey IP keeps adding the name of non-notable singer, the singing daughter who lives in New Jersey. Binksternet (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 03:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: To Prevent disruptive editing – 30/500 protect till next year, just so that no one will vandalise and me not notice. Thanks. L3X1 (distant write) 01:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also the user page, please. Thanks L3X1 (distant write) 02:25, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. also DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Mifter (talk) 03:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Inbound IPs adding unsourced information. Dr. K. 02:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 03:07, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Disruptive editing and vandalism, although not enough to warrant semiprotection. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 05:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ever since I created this article back in January, the only additions aside from text fixes have been vandalism (primarily adding irrelevant content and lists related to Nick Jr.). This article is about a brand that coexists alongside Nick Jr. and is definitely not the same thing. Squiddaddy (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- AlexTW 20:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—Appears to be a content dispute involving only one user. Please DRR-it. I suggest you start with participating at the discussion on Talk:Nardole, which both of you so far failed to do. El_C 23:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsupported additions IPs continuously add statements that are unsupported by any of the sources provided.--Harout72 (talk) 02:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 03:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, and IP was given notice, with a smart response - FOX 52 (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 20:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of good faith but disrupting IP editing (see the history, it's almost just IP editing and reverts). Unregistered editors insist on adding numbers from third parties to the UNODC global study table. The table is about UNODC's numbers, but IP editors insist on changing the values to something else they found online. Saturnalia0 (talk) 20:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As you said...it is good faith, and disruption is all in all below the threshold for protection; how about plastering a big hint on the editing screen like:"Hello, this is about UNODC's numbers; please do not add other figures". Lectonar (talk) 20:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal doing the same vandalism every several days since early March. Deli nk (talk) 20:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:58, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated promotional page on a management consultant. Went through AfD in March and was just reposted. Blythwood (talk) 23:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 00:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP sock pushing bad edits and vandalism. L3X1 (distant write) 00:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is subjected to numerous Patent Nonsense content addition, Admins do have a look, [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and [9]. Needs protection as per revisions. SuperHero👊 14:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Article subject trying to influence outcome. - Mlpearc (open channel) 15:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is well under control; the attempts to influence the outcome might in the end prove counterproductive for them. Lectonar (talk) 19:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Amortias (T)(C) 19:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Amortias (T)(C) 19:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent "Melinda" vandalism, that was also done on WXKB and WYDS, in which the 2 pages are already semi-protected.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dat GuyTalkContribs 23:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – It is a definite given that some careless dude would accidentally delete this page. And then all of the good AF contents would be lost.

Happy AFD. ;). NoNews! 15:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected for a period of 1 second, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Mz7 (talk) 00:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kellymoat (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Amortias (T)(C) 19:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Two experienced editors are edit-warring over the caption to an image. Please protect the article until they use the article's talk page to discuss their disagreement. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 22:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm going to deal with this more creatively. El_C 23:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: This is now at ANI... RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 23:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: Recently reverted edits from anon IP are repeat of ongoing historic problem on page by user of violations of biographies of living person policy (personal opinion, unsourced/non-reputable sources, vandalism, etc). Anon user historically edits upon protection expiration. Truthtopower09 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 18:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Yepper, better lock thisun up, she gettin' pummeled from all kindsa critters. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 19:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See discussion about Cliff1911 at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cliff1911 editing logged out, same stuff that got him blocked. Binksternet (talk) 21:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

03 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:10AB:7241:5DA8:D624 (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Main perpetrator blocked. Lectonar (talk) 13:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent lengthy protection on the article was just lifted (it was PC I believe) and the vandalism has since continued. . Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We might get lucky and the vandals will quit this one when the second installment is out. Lectonar (talk) 17:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – No reason for IP's to be editing the talk page of an indef blocked user. Sro23 (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 17:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Semi-protection log is getting full of useless edits by IP users. EditSafe (talk) 22:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: With four reverts after ~2 weeks, the PC protection seems to be doing its job, and I don't think Semi is necessary. That said, I was the one to apply PC, so I'll let somebody else take a second look at this. Vanamonde (talk) 05:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Way below the threshold for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 11:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one instance of vandalism since last protection ended 5 days ago Lectonar (talk) 13:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or pending changes protection (longer-term) – Persistent addition of unsourced bio info to a WP:BLP. --IJBall (contribstalk) 12:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially one IP; they have not been warned so far. Lectonar (talk) 13:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP and SPA attacks today. Justeditingtoday (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doug Weller talk 16:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persisitent vandalism by IP users. LilNumerator (talk) 10:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persisitent vandalism by IP users. Continous vandalism. Tommy Syahputra (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 15:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Request that the Anthony E. Meyer page be creation-protected. There is a multi-year history of page recreation here despite repeated deletes by the Wikipedia community due to a continued lack of subject notability. Historical edit logs show that Anthony E. Meyer has compelled and will likely continue to compel his employees to recreate and edit his deleted page over the years. This evidence suggests that the Anthony E. Meyer page is for commercial and personal branding purposes and therefore has no place on Wikipedia. Zhang213 (talk) 16:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see good faith IP edits in the history, and the page is not too active, so pending changes sounds best. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I suggest that this article be permanently protected from IP editing. The history is such a mess, with constant IP vandalism. If protected for a short while, the disruptions will definitely still continue after the protection expires. Jamie Tubers (talk) 12:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Yaris678 (talk) 12:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – MariaJaydHicky is currently on this page. Kellymoat (talk) 13:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sock has been blocked, too. Lectonar (talk) 14:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

04 April 2017

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 20:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 21:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper edit warring with multiple editors. The1337gamer (talk) 21:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 21:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protected by HJ Mitchell in 2010, then only about 10 edits later on. It needs to be updated regularly. 219.79.180.63 (talk) 10:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Indefinite semi create-protection - target for test edits, no reason for anyone to really be creating local description page. – Train2104 (t • c) 14:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same IP has vandalised this page twice. Although it may seem not much, I believe this vandal could use different IP's to vandalise. For strange reasons, this IP has made no other edits. I've issued a final warning but don't think it appropriate to have him blocked just for two edits. Yashovardhan (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Uglemat (talk) 15:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the disruptive edits are identical to this, indicating a single user with a very dynamic IP or an organized affair. Uglemat (talk) 15:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Phony burial entries and other vandalism have become a nuisance. Hertz1888 (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism and unproductive edits. TheWarOfArt (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done TPA restricted for duration of block. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article has an ongoing history of joke 1980s TV appearances being added to the lede. Pending changes doesn't seem to be working here, as a reviewer unfamiliar with the article subject or British television seems likely to wave through a joke edit in good faith. (This one remained in place for a full month.) Article gets barely any other IP edits. McGeddon (talk) 09:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. While I understand your concerns, this is simply not enough disruption for semi-protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continous IP and joke account vandalism. It's a AAA game so it generates quite a lot of traffic and should be protected. Lordtobi () 19:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continous IP and joke account vandalism. It's a AAA game so it generates quite a lot of traffic and should be protected. Lordtobi () 19:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 14:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Looks like the IP doeing this was blocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ToThAc (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vanity article, block evasion by COI account. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 07:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 13:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request. Sro23 (talk) 17:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Ponyo. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 16:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:52, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tour page vandalism and disruptive editing

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism from IP addresses and anonymous users. Edits being made are adding of dates that are false and/or unsourced. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Consistent changing of age of a living person to various ages by IP accounts, including some saying he was a minor, despite sources clearly showing otherwise. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Here we go again, a season BLP vio magnet. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 16:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same as above. Vandalism by socks of User:TobyThePug. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same as above. Vandalism by socks of User:TobyThePug. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same as above. Vandalism by socks of User:TobyThePug. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same as above. Vandalism by socks of User:TobyThePug. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 14:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Lots of dynamic IPs edit warring her birth date. Date in article is referenced to a statement she made giving the date meets WP:BLPPRIVACY. Editors are pushing a date derived from purported public record that conflicts with her own words and unusable anyway per WP:BLPPRIMARY. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for one month. Long term, persistent vandalism by Azul411 socks or IPs [10][11], related to similar vandalism of and sockmaster obsession with Galileo Galilei and Galileo affair. Article has already been protected and unprotected multiple times, but vandalism has increased after the Galileo articles were protected and therefore became inaccessible. Pinging @Favonian, Sro23, and DVdm: a few of the editors who've been dealing with this. Darouet (talk) 15:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper repeatedly changing sourced content. Sitush (talk) 15:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There has been a high level of persistent IP vandalism and disruptive editing in recent weeks, with IPs and new accounts repeatedly changing sourced content and inserting profanities. This follows widely-reported attacks and trolling of the artists' ongoing high-profile project HEWILLNOTDIVIDE.US. Esmeme (talk) 16:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hopefully, if ip's are blocked for a week or so, the disruptive editing will stop. Onel5969 TT me 11:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Main perpetrator is just one IP, 67.xxx Lectonar (talk) 11:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of Ferrari as a division of Volkswagen. This is based on an April Fool's stunt at http://gtspirit.com/2017/04/01/volkswagen-acquires-ferrari-13-billion-sergio-marchionne-resigns/ - note "Full details of this report can be found on the Volkswagen site here", which link's to WP's April Fools' Day article. Unfortunately, a slew of IPs are apparently taking it seriously. BilCat (talk) 11:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Very, very persistent vandalism by IPs/sock accounts of User:TobyThePug. Needs to be a longer PP, since the vandal edits began today just as the previous one ended. Unfortunately, I'll have to list a shitload more articles for PP below. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same as above. Vandalism by socks of User:TobyThePug. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:53, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same as above. Vandalism by socks of User:TobyThePug. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IP vandalism attacks today . IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon-IP edit war related to the "Gamergate" section; should probably be put under extended-confirmed. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 01:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 02:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by unregistered and/or new users, possibly sockpuppet accounts. 90sNickfan (talk) 07:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: --> Article has been continuously vandalised for 2 days with constant edits to the principal's name, which are incorrect. Uuu100145j (talk) 11:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Talk page of dead Wikipedian. Mr. Guye (talk) 04:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Pending changes are not enabled on user talk pages. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 05:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – This Youtuber's article has been absolutely under attack. Mr. Guye (talk) 05:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 05:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-hopper has been edit-warring (with no edit summary except "/") to add incorrect and/or uncited text for past 10+ days. Softlavender (talk) 08:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – No need for this disruption . Moxy (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:04, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
El_C. Conflict there. While you were protecting I blocked both of them for 31 hours. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. Copy that. El_C 22:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Both the protecting admin (yours truly) and the blocking admin (CambridgeBayWeather) have decided to implement ARBPIA/Ds to the article. El_C 22:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is a target of a long-term sock/vandal. Also, someone needs to rev-del/whatever some of their edit summaries on this article. Shearonink (talk) 04:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1:9A1A:3E6:6CFF:40B5:E83A:4EA2 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 05:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Man on a mission using multiple IP, see also User_talk:Denniss#there_is_no_disruptive_editing_and_I_do_not_appreciate_being_threatened. Denniss (talk) 08:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Frequency is too low for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent offensive words and vandalism from the same user. User talk:Oliszydlowski, 18:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 10:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (edit conflict) While the edit summaries have been ... unpleasant ... the content in question (quality of pollution in the city) sounds like a good faith dispute, so a full-protection is necessary to avoid taking sides. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Procedural point—I think you should have asked Widr first if you could change the protection level. El_C 18:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 02:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's nothing constructive coming from IPs/new editors here. . Vanamonde (talk) 05:50, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 06:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:50, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ClockC Actually, some constructive editing from newbies since I posted this. Will almost certainly have to be protected once the west coast wakes up, but I don't want to block them out just yet. TimothyJosephWood 13:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, that's more like it. Starting to get into the vandal per minute area. TimothyJosephWood 14:06, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Taking into account vandalisers who get late to the party....Lectonar (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Shortened to 2 days; IPs, please use the article's talk-page to request edits. Lectonar (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended one-month protection: The same IP user keeps violating other articles like Kraków. He is again using offensive and very vulgar language and I believe that 2 days protection is not enough. Can this be extended to one month? Best Regards - User talk:Oliszydlowski, 20:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The article is still under semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP unsourced genre warring again. I've attempted to go back to the main list as posted on the talk page but IPs continue to change and add other subgenres. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 05:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - persistent vandalism by IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. TheBlueCanoe 00:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If this request were made on March 16 then I would semi-protect.Jusjih (talk) 00:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: This article has been subject to section blanking by IP editors for over 10 years now. Possibly due to the relatively low profile of the subject, the section blanking often goes un-noticed for several months. I have just reverted a section blanking that went un-noticed for 11 months. I reverted a section blanking that went un-noticed for 8 months in 2014. Freikorp (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from same editor on multiple IP's same subnet. Refuses to discuss on talk page. Adamgerber80 (talk) 02:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:IP users keep coming back to remove information from Certifications. Cather2021 (talk) 22:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 22:54, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – global banned user. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Styron111 Widefox; talk 02:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 02:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs from New Jersey keep adding the name of subject's non-notable daughter, who lives in New Jersey. . Binksternet (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping editor has been repeatedly disrupting this article since 2015 (requiring two semi-protections so far) has returned to continue his disruption. Deli nk (talk) 20:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sro23 (talk) 01:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 01:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You know, I was having fun playing whack-a-sock, but it looks like it's been protected. Primefac (talk) 01:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New editors keep removing reliable sources from the article. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:52, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs persistently adding unreliable information to the article. Would SP myself, but have previously edited it. Black Kite (talk) 22:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 00:53, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal. Sro23 (talk) 23:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing, and addition of content that is unsourced or poorly sourced, or removal of content that IS sourced. livelikemusic talk! 23:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 00:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 19:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Someone is replacing "Asher" repeatedly with "Asr." Not sure if it constitutes vandalism, but definitely disruptive. Coming from multiple IP addresses. I'd just keep reverting away, but that could be seen as edit-warring. Alephb (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the duration of the block (could have just reblocked without ability to edit own talk page, but this works, too). El_C 22:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Promotional content, presumably block evasion. 2601:188:1:AEA0:10AB:7241:5DA8:D624 (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – IP adding, and edit warring over reinsertion of copyrighted materials and unsourced sections; accuses editors of racism. ScrpIronIV 14:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Has been in the news a LOT lately, so this page has gotten lots of unconstructive edits lately, and will continue to do so if it is not semi'd. Everymorning (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP user who was upset by the ending of the series. Areaseven (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 36.80.201.118 (talk · contribs) blocked by Amortias. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 17:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP user who was upset by the ending of the series. Areaseven (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 36.80.201.118 (talk · contribs) blocked by Amortias. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 17:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: This is on the MW blacklist, but do not want new users trying to create this to get confused that it is protected from creation. UpsandDowns1234 17:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 17:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 17:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the slow-motion edit war is being conducted using multiple IPv6, so AIV/ANI are pointless. General Ization Talk 17:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When there is one or two vandalism edits per day, protection is not the way to go; please read our protection policy in case you have not done so already. Watchlist and revert, and/or play whack-a-mole is sometimes more convenient. Lectonar (talk) 17:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist 18:06, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:54, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced speculation and potentially defamatory WP:BLP allegations repeatedly added by IP and unconfirmed user(s). Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new users putting God as an occupation again. Recommend as long a protection as possible, since this is not likely to get better until Supernatural goes off the air. Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 18:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Semi-protection: Was protected earlier due to a high amount of IP and new account edits changing the narrative of the article after a consensus was reach on the talk page. After the protection expired people returned to make the same edits without discussing it on the talk page. e.g.: [12] discussed here: [13] MasontWang (talk) 18:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MereTechnicality 19:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Large amount of IP vandalism and rumors that has been present ever since the event was announced. Nickag989talk 20:04, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:00, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, . Atlantic306 (talk) 21:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama

In the Legacy section, the first sentence is misleading: "Obama's most significant legacy is generally considered to be the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which went into effect from 2010 to 2020." While the provisions in the act take effect over the course of that time-span, the wording implies that the entire effect of the act will end in 2020. Perhaps it would be better phrased with "gradually" as: "[...] which went into effect gradually from 2010 to 2020." Further improved might be "[...] provisions of which entered into effect from 2010 to 2020."

I would make this request on the talk page, but apparently it is also protected against IP edits. (This seems a bit excessive, by the way.) 108.202.198.41 (talk) 16:04, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @108.202.198.41: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sudden outburst by ips. Minima© (talk) 20:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 20:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term slow edit war over whether this is a neighborhood or a community. Same reason as prior protection. . John from Idegon (talk) 20:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 20:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – School page is defaced by ips. Spam links ????. CopernicusAD (u) (t) :) 20:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Mz7 (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for the page to be get temporary semi-protection due to persistent disruption from IP editors, however, that problem is now over. The article was instead given pending changes, which makes it difficult to have the article up-to-date as you have to wait for someone to accept the changes. There's several vigilant and responsible editors (including myself) at that article and we're all capable of reverting vandalism ourselves. It would serve the article better if the pending changes was removed as the reason for original request for protection is no longer an issue. Thank you. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mifter: Lectonar (talk) 13:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Swarm 20:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. This page is disruptively edited by many IP users. Vibhss (talk) 15:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No IP activity in last 24 hours. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NPalgan2 (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 19:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've only applied PC, as I think the most of the mistaken reports are now cleared up, and the IPs are generally constructive. Bring it back if vandalism persists. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated additions by several different editors of the same (or closely similar) unreferenced and unencyclopaedic content. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users persistently adding the year 2017 to the section heading for Season 7 (or links to that section) when no episodes have yet aired in that year (going against the WP:TVUPCOMING guideline in MOS:TV). The next episode of Pretty Little Liars airs on April 18, less than two weeks from now, so I don't know if it would be too much to semiprotect until then. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated addition of non-notable people. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated attack page on a teacher. Boleyn (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Attempt at whitewashing by one user; please use AIV if they insist. Lectonar (talk) 11:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 12:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing (might not be right categorization?) – Persistent and pervasive reversions, editwarring, polemics, and general bad faith editing by many users for a long time that ultimately has led almost nowhere. I suggest semi-protection as a heuristic solution (or whatever else). Sıgehelmus (Talk) |д=) 14:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Semi-protection would achieve nothing here, as most involved are rather experienced editors. Lectonar (talk) 14:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts by dynamic IPs to add a nonsense sentence to a character description. —Farix (t | c) 12:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a farm of socks making anti-gay threats on this page. 24 hours should do it, even 12 might be enough. GoldenRing (talk) 14:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism stretches back for days. NeilN talk to me 15:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection A rotating set of IPs continue to add an unsourced list. I started a thread on the talk page Talk:Inspector George Gently#TV stations but they have not bothered to post there. Perhaps they will if the article gets a few days protection. MarnetteD|Talk 14:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note I am not sure if the decliner looked at the edit history. The IP switcher has made this edit on a daily (almost) basis since 23 March. The thread on the talk page was started on the 24th. MarnetteD|Talk 15:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dschslava Δx parlez moi 15:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive IP edits with respect to the role of race and racism in this movie. Requesting indefinite WP: PC protection due to the sensitive nature of the film's subject matter. Vrrajkum (talk) 07:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This is not really disruptive, but another point of view; both POV are somewhat sourced, so you will need to find consensus, one way or the other. Start a thread at the articles talk-page first, me thinks. Lectonar (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – persistent BLP violation by new users and I.P users. This revision says it all. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 08:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute has degenerated into edit-warring. Exemplo347 (talk) 13:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Straight to the talk-page, everybody. Lectonar (talk) 13:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing by registered users. TheBD2000 (talk) 23:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry - Vandalism by Hopping IP address of 49.14x.xxx.xxx. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 05:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent IPuser edit warring and disruptive diting. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 05:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant random and intentionally wrong edits. TropicAces (talk) 20:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 21:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Cahk (talk) 07:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Over the last couple of weeks, a few newly registered accounts and IPs have been persistently adding unreferenced trivia (gossip, rather) to this BLP. bonadea contributions talk 08:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from anonymous users or new users. I already requested this a few days earlier, and the page was protected for a limited time. As soon as te protection expired, vandalism started appearing again (erronous edits regarding the club's name and others). 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 22:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please remember that this is a wiki. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP vandalism since last page protection expired, courtesy of a 4chan Internet meme. Refer to any edit that added content since last page protection. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 01:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Justeditingtoday (talk) 01:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The user Debiit insists on adding the second name of the Japanese voice actor having to extract information from IMDB or MyAnimeList stating that it is correct but that happens, that this is wrong. See below 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. They could semi-protect this article for 4 months. 148.101.48.35 (talk) 02:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just about all non-(auto)confirmed edits going back to mid-2015 if not further are either vandalism or the removal thereof; page was quiet for a while (no edits at all for about five months) but since 31st of March has started back up again. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 21:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and deletion of reliable sources by an edit warring hopping IP, with absurd edit summary that has nothing to do with the data being randomly changed. A message on the talk page requesting explanation continues to be ignored by the IP. Requesting a one week temp semi-protection for now, or whatever makes sense in these cases. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 22:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant amount of vandalism within the past few weeks. Lepricavark (talk) 23:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 23:53, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations, addition of unsourced content. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the wording in this edit about "talk to tonight" can you please preemptively SEMI this for 12 hours?. L3X1 (distant write) 01:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 16 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name. UpsandDowns1234 (Talk to me) (My Contribs) 15:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: Shouldn't this already be listed at MediaWiki:Titleblacklist ? Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 15:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This should probably be declined - Account isn't registered and no one's ever created the page, So kinda pointless protecting at the moment. –Davey2010Talk 15:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible page, that should be also move protected. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 18:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent COI editing by GrupoTripleS. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 18:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. For spam, for copyright violation and username. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 19:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

07 April 2017

Semi-protection: Constant poorly sourced additions and bad understanding of what constitutes as a shared universe. Regular edit warring as well. ★Trekker (talk) 09:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—On the face of it: fair request. But on closer examination: you haven't tried the article talk page at all (applying edit summaries such as: see talk, wherein, you explain what they did wrong), or really engaging with these new users beyond such edit summaries as removed edits by person who clearly doesn't know what they're doing. That may be so, but simply semiprotecting the page and scaring them off, intuitively, seems like the wrong move. El_C 12:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm tired of trying to explain things to ip editors they never engage in discussion on talk pages and never take a hint from edit summaries. This isn't just today, this has been going on for a long time now. Several different editors, ip and usernames who just insert complete clutter and fan speculation without any sources whatsoever. There is no way to explain to every single one of them what's going on. I'm at least trying to keep the article in somewhat respectable shape and keep it from turning into a complete mess.★Trekker (talk) 15:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added an explanation on the talk page, we'll see how many IP editors even acknowledge it, especially since there already was a discussion above which talks about this subject.★Trekker (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. This "good article" needs permanent semi-protection as it is heavily edited by anonymous users most of whom disrupt the article. Vibhss (talk) 10:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—I've already blocked one of the main disruptive IPs for a month. And we neither permanently nor preemptively semiprotect articles. El_C 12:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The majority of edits since July have been by socks of banned user Filipz123, inserting the phrase "founder of cosmonautics". Burninthruthesky (talk) 14:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the article is edited very infrequently--Ymblanter (talk) 14:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated changes by a variable IP without discussion(dispute over the use of the word "occupied" vs. "disputed" territory. 331dot (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandalisms - suspected of being the same person. Kellymoat (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Repeated vandalism to person by variable IP's, including one VPN. defamation to a living person. Request for ongoing protection due to being a living person / individual. Skittymitty (talk) 15:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 17:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Weeks of attempts by multiple IPs and new accounts to insert bogus band members' names. Meters (talk) 16:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A lot of reverts of IP and new accounts lately due to Manilow recently coming out as gay. Arbor to SJ (talk) 17:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per ignored notes, edits violate WP:CRYSTAL, just with everything else - add it once it has occurred. Protection against IP editors who have come into contact with recent news and are unaware of WP's guidelines and policies. -- AlexTW 17:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs in the last few days making edits flagged by Cluebot NG ... some of these edits (essentially putting in the same content) might be serious BLP policy violations, like here. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of death without any sources. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive activity by IP hopper. The editor has already been blocked once but is back on a new number. Betty Logan (talk) 18:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition by IP of unsourced content. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Persistent addition by two IP addresses of unsourced and unnecessary content, as well as overall disruption. The editors have been blocked once until today, when the semi-protection order was lifted. May need to increase the protection to prevent this from happening further.

Alex jirgens (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - repeated changes to name and birthdate, removal of content, addition of random nonsense characters. Juansmith (talk) 19:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of cited content by multiple IPs. RA0808 talkcontribs 19:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There has been a determined effort to copy/paste copyrighted content into this article. I'm thinking temporary semi protection will stifle it. Also, please redact the copyright violating material. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 20:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Probable IP sock of blocked user Meredithcompass (talk · contribs). caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - persistent vandalism from various IP hoppers. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor 20:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

07 April 2017

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See User talk:2405:204:F288:91B6:B1CB:7AC0:7D51:6997. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The protection expired on 25 March and now the spammers are back again. The Banner talk 18:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The Banner did you really want full? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but let us wait till the suspected registered user returns with his spamming. His block ends on 10 April... The Banner talk 19:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of original research; block evasion . ChamithN (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 14:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of persistent vandalism by the same user (know that is the same for the WHOIP location, although it changes the IP twice in a day). I request a semi-protection of this page because every day various users we have to revert the changes on this page. This page was semi-protected a week ago and he waited for the protection to end to keep doing again those vandalism changes. I request a bigger semi-protection of the page. --TechnicianGB (talk) 14:55, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and TechnicianGB no attacks on the IP. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@CambridgeBayWeather: ok thanks. --TechnicianGB (talk) 17:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of persistent vandalism by the same 2 users, as they use this time a fixed IP, I did discuss with one user in the talk page and he keeps deleting the sources, the data... Without caring about nothing and just saying unrelated things, but it still does those kind of editions. The other user puts directly ridiculous data, both users vandalizing the climate paragraph of the page of Lisbon. I request a semi-protection of this page because every day various users we have to revert the changes on this page. --TechnicianGB (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:27, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. See article history. Eik Corell (talk) 16:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Given the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to the SCOTUS seat Garland was nominated for, this page has and likely will continue to see disruptive editing related to that. 331dot (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There has been a long, slow edit war at Sciences Po. The article was full-protected once, but the to-and-fro resumed after it lifted. I am trying to initiate discussion at the talk page and get the parties to talk. However, the unregistered users continue to edit-war without participating in the discussion. Semi-protection for about a month should force them to come to the talk page. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High persistent of vandalism. To be protected because it's high-rated television drama. International Editor Shah (talk) 11:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated modification of sourced information updating episode count that does not match data in tagged reference.

See also Talk:Jeopardy!#7,500 episodes. AldezD (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. At least two editors involved in this dispute have been autoconfirmed, so semi-protection would be moot. Please continue to work it out on the talk page. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salt - Recreated four times today. I think that's probably quite enough. TimothyJosephWood 14:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Greg (talk) 08:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Constant addition of content biased towards the article subject, appearing to be from sources that have an undeclared conflict of interest. Continued attempts to keep page neutral and unbiased being hampered by constant edits. Patrick478 (talk) 09:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs are not helpful are have only engaged in an edit war these past days. A discussion of the ongoing issues was launched on 1 March 2017 and to date, no IP has contributed to the talk. There are established accounts inserting the same false information as the IPs but as things stand, the anons are helping these individuals who believe themselves to be above talkpage activity. OJ (talk) 11:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:IP user keeps coming back to remove information from Certifications. Cather2021 (talk) 12:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist 09:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same as before, please (Edit = autoconfirmed, move = administrator). Patient Zerotalk 12:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Favonian (talk) 12:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent "supersonic transport" vandal who pops up every few weeks with dynamic IPs on several airliner articles. BilCat (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. – Train2104 (t • c) 14:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP-hopper keeps removing sourced material and replacing it with unsourced material. Blocking the IP won't help because the editor will simply use another IP. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 00:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
El C, since the IP-hopper keeps coming back, then what should be done? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take it on—just let me know when they return. El_C 02:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, El C. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or perhaps PC protection; but nothing constructive has come from IPs for a long while, and a lot of disruption has occurred in the meantime. . Vanamonde (talk) 09:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will keep an eye on it. Semi seems to be overkill at the moment, not that much editing activity over the last months. Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Edit warring by two IPs Jim1138 (talk) 09:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Might get them on the talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 09:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism Edits as User:TV5Ozamiz IP Sock put as Hoax Filipino Actor "Kean Rabuyo" as Hoax Artists. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 04:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent IP disruptive edits and vandalism. An IP starting with 2804:431:b724 and 2804:431:b725 has been consistently making disruptive edits and vandalism on various Naruto game-related pages. Maybe more, it's hard to tell, since the section half of the IP keeps changing. If look at the history of these three pages, however, you'll notice that this has been going on for over a year now, if not even longer. The Storm 4 page was even semi-protected before because of it. But since the IP user is now back after a short break, I request just permanently semi-protecting these pages. One can't just "patrol" these pages forever because of the same user.  Kyoushu~  ►Talk Page  21:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. The first one was already protected by Ferret. The other two have never been previously protected, though the second one had pending changes configured. Since the second one was only targeted once, I protected it for a week, keeping pending changes intact. The third one I protected for a month. If after the expiration the disruptive editor returns we can extend the protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly created. Cahk (talk) 08:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 08:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Vinay Maurya. Cahk (talk) 08:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 08:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 00:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same vandal that regularly vandalizes the Spider-Man in other media article is now targeting this one. ★Trekker (talk) 00:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 04:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IPv6 adding fake credits. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 04:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - sensitive current event. Various cases of IP vandalism in the past few hours. Philip Terry Graham 04:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Done by Coffee.) Swarm 04:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing of new accounts and IP's - addition of incorrect (contrary to current citations) and uncited information. Garchy (talk) 16:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please don't call other editors idiots, and do try to keep your cool. El_C 18:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Vandalisms - suspected of being the same person, an ex employee. Request for ongoing protection or blocking of that user. Mfaganasen (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The BLP violations were added anonymously 6 months ago, with no malicious editing since then. No page protection or blocking is warranted at this time. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – Speedy deleted by WP:G7, violates WP:BLP. See Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_April_3#Bowling_Green_massacre_hoax. UpsandDowns1234 (Talk to me) (My Contribs) 21:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—Not recreated. El_C 21:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - The criticism section is repeatedly being removed. 2600:1002:B126:7E66:FD93:77CF:BBC8:3E3E (talk) 21:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • This article has been protected several times in the past because it has been the target for several years of a single IP-hopping disruptive editor. Another semi-protection would be helpful. Deli nk (talk) 21:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 23:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. So much for that. NeilN talk to me 23:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism from several IPs adding same content (almost certainly socks) over last week or so. YITYNR My workWhat's wrong? 21:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CaptainPedge | Talk 23:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism regarding her age (legal v real). Quis separabit? 00:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Semi-protection: Constant poorly sourced additions and bad understanding of what constitutes as a shared universe. Regular edit warring as well. ★Trekker (talk) 09:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—On the face of it: fair request. But on closer examination: you haven't tried the article talk page at all (applying edit summaries such as: see talk, wherein, you explain what they did wrong), or really engaging with these new users beyond such edit summaries as removed edits by person who clearly doesn't know what they're doing. That may be so, but simply semiprotecting the page and scaring them off, intuitively, seems like the wrong move. El_C 12:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm tired of trying to explain things to ip editors they never engage in discussion on talk pages and never take a hint from edit summaries. This isn't just today, this has been going on for a long time now. Several different editors, ip and usernames who just insert complete clutter and fan speculation without any sources whatsoever. There is no way to explain to every single one of them what's going on. I'm at least trying to keep the article in somewhat respectable shape and keep it from turning into a complete mess.★Trekker (talk) 15:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added an explanation on the talk page, we'll see how many IP editors even acknowledge it, especially since there already was a discussion above which talks about this subject.★Trekker (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. This "good article" needs permanent semi-protection as it is heavily edited by anonymous users most of whom disrupt the article. Vibhss (talk) 10:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—I've already blocked one of the main disruptive IPs for a month. And we neither permanently nor preemptively semiprotect articles. El_C 12:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The majority of edits since July have been by socks of banned user Filipz123, inserting the phrase "founder of cosmonautics". Burninthruthesky (talk) 14:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the article is edited very infrequently--Ymblanter (talk) 14:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated changes by a variable IP without discussion(dispute over the use of the word "occupied" vs. "disputed" territory. 331dot (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandalisms - suspected of being the same person. Kellymoat (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Repeated vandalism to person by variable IP's, including one VPN. defamation to a living person. Request for ongoing protection due to being a living person / individual. Skittymitty (talk) 15:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 17:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Weeks of attempts by multiple IPs and new accounts to insert bogus band members' names. Meters (talk) 16:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A lot of reverts of IP and new accounts lately due to Manilow recently coming out as gay. Arbor to SJ (talk) 17:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per ignored notes, edits violate WP:CRYSTAL, just with everything else - add it once it has occurred. Protection against IP editors who have come into contact with recent news and are unaware of WP's guidelines and policies. -- AlexTW 17:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs in the last few days making edits flagged by Cluebot NG ... some of these edits (essentially putting in the same content) might be serious BLP policy violations, like here. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of death without any sources. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive activity by IP hopper. The editor has already been blocked once but is back on a new number. Betty Logan (talk) 18:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition by IP of unsourced content. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Persistent addition by two IP addresses of unsourced and unnecessary content, as well as overall disruption. The editors have been blocked once until today, when the semi-protection order was lifted. May need to increase the protection to prevent this from happening further.

Alex jirgens (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - repeated changes to name and birthdate, removal of content, addition of random nonsense characters. Juansmith (talk) 19:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of cited content by multiple IPs. RA0808 talkcontribs 19:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There has been a determined effort to copy/paste copyrighted content into this article. I'm thinking temporary semi protection will stifle it. Also, please redact the copyright violating material. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 20:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Probable IP sock of blocked user Meredithcompass (talk · contribs). caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - persistent vandalism from various IP hoppers. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor 20:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

09 April 2017

Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring. And vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We're not fully protecting in this type of situation. Blocks can be levied if need be. NeilN talk to me 14:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 14:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent IP vandalism target, constant removal of content like genres and critical reception. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I would keep an eye on it, and if the problem worsens, feel free to re-request here. Mz7 (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to this page being featured on the Main Page, it is consistently being vandalized. Blorper234 (talk) 16:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 16:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 16:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism for days. Justeditingtoday (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 16:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 16:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism for four days now. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 18:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism for four days now. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:23, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 18:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protecting admin has not responded to a query. Based on the edit history, this does not seem to merit anything beyond upload protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected, I reduced it to extended confirmed, since the edit history suggests attacks are likely. I would not object reducing to semi if this is the consensus, but complete unprotection seems unwarranted to me.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

09 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP and SPA vandalism. Justeditingtoday (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Oli9011 (talk) 19:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or Pending changes: This one recently came off protection, and we're already back to the Vandalism and addition of unsourced or trivial content edits... --IJBall (contribstalk) 19:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:27, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brayan Jaimes (talk) 21:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:36, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurring target by long-term abuser Bertrand101. Page has still been subject to vandalism even after repeated protection attempts, so perhaps a semi would slow him down. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated ip vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517Chat Very Busy 18:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism this week, still on-going. Innisfree987 (talk) 19:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Blatant hoax keeps being created and deleted. Deleted per G3 twice. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 16:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 16:32, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Please extend semi-protection as people within the Mr Gay World organization are trying to remove and/or change the controversy section to clean up their image. Everything currently in the controversy section is correct and is backed up with references/links. Goodbelle (talk) 17:32, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Runs until April 11. Lectonar (talk) 17:36, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA Satt 2. -. LouisAragon (talk) 17:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some people choose to submit their drafts here by replacing the redirect. I wonder why it wasn't protected already. Yashovardhan (talk) 12:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 13:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Derpy admin. NeilN talk to me 16:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Please create protect this page so that only editors with the extended confirmed user permission can create the page. I am requesting this since I am testing some template code using protection level checks, and I need an example of a page with such a protection to run the tests. Thanks!. Steel1943 (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done See above, please. Lectonar (talk) 16:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Minor at the moment, but there is a potential for worse given current events and this group's alleged role as a front/propaganda organisation. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 09:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Please re-report when it picks up and gets disruptive. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Extreme persistent vandalism and threatening sentences. User:Oliszydlowski, 15:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Lectonar (talk) 14:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued amon vandalism. reddogsix (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have kept it short, as the article is at AfD; I have often seen IP's making good edits which might be able to save the article from deletion. Lectonar (talk) 15:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP POV pushing. Huldra (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 01:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP POV pushing. Huldra (talk) 20:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 01:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: User (User:Hookahlove) is editing since last few days(4 April 2017‎), he/she is a new user, adding his own POV. There is full revert, no discussion regarding edits, deleting content and citations, no summary and no explanation, no effort to engage on talk page either. Hoping him to come on talk page, seeking protection for the page till the time being. Thanks. Shimlaites (talk) 07:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, we do not protect pages against a single user. If they behave disruptively, they should eventually be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing with no sources by Charles lindberg I have tried to correct the editor with sources of my own but they will not listen. Thank You. INeeDaFatToke (talk) 03:48, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Two users who were edit warring about O'Leary's military training have just been blocked per WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 05:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since due to the reveal of the new characters, there is an influx of vandals so I suggest a permanent protection on this article. BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 09:42, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple edits attempting to change information about 2017 Khan Shaykhun chemical attack to support a political narrative. As well changes contain unsourced or poorly sourced content Balthusdire (talk) 09:48, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption including blanking, vandalism, and copy and pasting other article info into this article. Thanks. Antonioatrylia (talk) 02:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 03:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 07:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 42.109.169.251 (talk) 08:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:29, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent COI-editing and addition of self-promotional content by single-purpose IPs. No response to talkpage messages. GermanJoe (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—I won't approve this request until you try the article talk page. El_C 01:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Venudxb (talk) 22:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits this year. El_C 02:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Needs pending changes protection; most IP edits are vandals, but there is occasionally a useful one. PC is best choice here. Montanabw(talk) 04:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Indef. It appears that over 95% of all the IP edits are getting reverted. This is a burden on the regular editors, since even with Pending Changes, all the bad edits would need to be undone. EdJohnston (talk) 05:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption. - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption. - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs Jim1138 (talk) 03:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 04:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs permanent semi protection or pending changes protection, steady drumbeat of IP vandalism . Montanabw(talk) 04:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 04:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and disruptive editing since the Raiders announced the move to Las Vegas. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Poorly-sourced allegations. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – BLP issues. See also [14]. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:06, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:08, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – School vandalism. Karlpoppery (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unregistered users, typical of UFC PPVs... Will get worse as the event is happening right now. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated attempts from IP users to add some form of "terrorist" to the article. gwendy (talk) 01:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

10 April 2017

Semi-protection: BLP violations. There might be news that this living person, who serves as the governor of Alabama, could be facing an impeachment soon. Slasher405 (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: rotating IPs are entering nonsense into infobox. A day or two should send them elsewhere. MarnetteD|Talk 21:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – With slightly less than 300,000 transclusions, this does not merit full protection let alone cascading one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you already asksed CBM? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, I forgot about them. Sorry! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lectonar (talk) 20:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 16:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Or just block Carrickwong122 and be done with it. TimothyJosephWood 16:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Indef blocked the vandalism-only account. — Maile (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – This metatemplate is not so widely used - or in the interface - as to merit full protection much less cascading one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you asked Arbitrarily0? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, I forgot about them. Sorry! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done The protecting admin is rather semi-active at the moment, if at all. Lectonar (talk) 20:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – This appears to be one of the lesser used citation templates. Not convinced it needs full protection, much less cascading. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you asked Fuhghettaboutit? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See response below as to #Template:Category other. This one has over 19,000 transclusions.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lectonar (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Originally protected by @Callanecc:, but none of the two parent templates (Template:DYKmake and Template:DYKmake/DYKmake-insert) are protected or show any indication that they need one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: Have you asked Callanecc CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The protection log on the template you linked in the section heading shows it was protected by Shubinator. I would be happier if all DYK templates were protected. The reason being, is that we've seen within the last year good-faith changes to DYK templates by non-admins have messed up the cascading process. Also, it's probably not best for the process to bypass DYK discussion and ask here to change one of its templates.— Maile (talk) 12:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Sort of; I've brought this down to semi-protection, which should be enough. Lectonar (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change to permanent semi-protection To avoid the previously harsh, infinite and inevitable vandalism by many unregistered users I ask for the article to be permanently semi-protected. The article has been come a target of severe vandalism and some very offensive words were used against users, especially myself. If the vandalism stops occurring then the protection level can be reduced over time. Oliszydlowski 15:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Oliszydlowski, there's no good reason to change the current one month semi to a permanent. NeilN talk to me 15:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeats of the same vandalism by numerous different IPs. David Biddulph (talk) 19:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – multiple IPv6 and IPv4 edit warring and refusing discussion. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6 edit warring and refusing discussion. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Many IP edits repeatedly adding a birth year, but no sources. Grayfell (talk) 19:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one IP in the last days; apart from that not even heavily edited. Lectonar (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Massive edit-war underway. Please also take action against the users, if only to give them formal, strong, warnings. Carl Fredrik talk 18:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Socking NeilN talk to me 18:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Puerile vandalism of the sort that’s usually a one-off, but in this case there have been more than one IP and two new (throwaway?) accounts repeatedly adding “up yer arse”, and variants thereof, over the past couple of days.—Odysseus1479 18:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: My first time requesting protection, but I think this is the right level protection to request at this point, unless there is another one available. There seems to be a new editor User:CindyRoleder (already has 100 edits) who does not add edit summaries to any of their edits and does not use the Talk page to discuss major edits. I and another editor have left a message for her on her Talk Page to use edit summaries, in general, and article talk pages to discuss edits since she is new, but this has not worked. On the article specifically, me and another editor have already reverted her a few times due to lack of explaining and discussing edits. I even created a discussion on the article's talk page and pinged her to get her attention on where to discuss edits. The changes on the article are becoming daily now for 5 days already, and I tried to comprise a little despite the short comings. Help! (Ramos1990)Huitzilopochtli1990 (talk) 09:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 20:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Local football club. Karlpoppery (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing -- reversion of subject's birthplace and nationality by multiple new editors and anon. Examples: [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Note most of these are in April so the incidence of disruption is accelerating lately. -- Bri (talk) 17:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC) This is in spite of an attempt to address it as a content issue on the article talkpage. -- Bri (talk) 17:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 17:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism on a marquee player section (one case : They place Lionel Messi as the player of Persija.) Including by (VPN proxy anon IP address. User:Ricdowiki95 (talk) 02:42, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism on a living person (now happened three times in last few weeks) Including by VPN proxy anon IP address. Skittymitty (talk) 11:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Skittymitty: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read the protection policy; also, as you tend to edit only certain pages, please declare any conflict of interest you might have. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 11:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: due to Persistent vandalism. I have never made this request, so apologies if I am not doing this correctly, but this article is getting frequent IP edits that are vandalism and biography of living person issues. It would be better if editing was handled by registered users. It had protection earlier, and as soon as it expired, there were issues again. MeropeRiddle (talk) 15:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism by IPs. Tompop888 (talk) (contribs) 16:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since release of teaser trailer. Richiekim (talk) 17:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism, continous by IP users. Tommy Syahputra (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Could you offer some specific diffs. I'm not seeing anything recent that looks like vandalism, but I'm also not familiar with the subject. Thanks. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from IP editors. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in move-protection level: Please change move-protection for this template from "sysop" to "template editor" (or lower). This was added at the same time that edit-protection was set to "autoconfirmed". Protecting admin is inactive, with one edit in 2016 and no edits in 2017. Thanks. -- Zyxw (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lectonar (talk) 14:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – nothing but vandalism from anon editors, protected in past. WNYY98 (talk) 05:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing from this month. Or last month. Or the month before. El_C 05:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive editing/dummy edits by several IP users. 173.69.20.107 (talk) 08:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Vandalism as Unsourced Upcoming Hoax TV Shows as IP Sock of User:Taiki0409. LG-Gunther :  Talk  08:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:30, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – With only slightly more than 200,000 transclusions, this probably does not merit full protection much less cascading. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit-warring without reaching consensus on the talk page. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:06, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 05:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An unregistered user constantly adds Matthew Mercer without sources. I even checked elsewhere and it wasn't confirmed that Matthew Mercer will voices Zamas in English. FierceJake754 (talk) 00:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 05:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Every time protection of this article ends, an IP always vandalizes it. Could we potentially put some sort of protection on it? ḾỊḼʘɴίcảTalkI DX for fun! 02:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 05:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – certain IP users persistent to change the youtube view count in increments other than 10 [example 452 instead of just 450]. Jennica / talk 05:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: a dynamical IP restores the 1854 wall of text without discussion. Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Lectonar (talk) 07:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two registered editors have started a (very) embryonic discussion on the talk- but are still revert-warring with each other on the article page. This has been going on for some days now, and has included edit warring templates on usertalk pages, a (rightly) rejected retaliatory request here yesterday, and an ANI when that didn't work. I'm uninvolved, but will start a talk page discussion- I think that maybe a day's worth of fpp might focus attention and keep ANEW at bay. Cheers, . — O Fortuna velut luna 08:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I'd guess you want the article protected, so have edited the request accordingly. As for the request: I agree there is edit-warring (imho not enough to warrant full protection), and I have watchlisted; there seems to be a more than slight chance that a discussion might prove useful and people will refrain form reverting back-and forth (the article was not very heavily edited over the weekend). If the edit-war picks up pace, I will protect. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Right, thanks, Lectonar- I've started a discussion here, so we'll take it from there. — O Fortuna velut luna 08:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit war, removal of references, deletion of material. Apuldram (talk) 18:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @Apuldram: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 07:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: High level of IP and user vandalism. Tuxipεdia(talk) 02:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. By Materialsscientist. El_C 05:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring over HDI figure by IPs, in spite of article comment and discussion on talk page. Dhtwiki (talk) 02:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: recent spate of IPs introducing random unref box-office/budget figures. Dl2000 (talk) 03:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper making changes against long-standing consensus. Calidum 04:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: BLP violations by multiple IPs. Meters (talk) 05:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Section 'Criticisms and controversies' talks about Pastor Alwin but there is substantiated reference for that. Please it removed. Next sub-section talks about a murder but that again is not factual. I asked the admin for removing protection level but he has not responded back. @Jeril842002 (talk) 14:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you ask the protecting admin? You have more accounts? Lectonar (talk) 14:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: @Jeril842002: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Lectonar, I asked in Talk section of the Wikipage Jeril842002 (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Procedural decline; wanting to make an edit is not a valid reason for unprotecting an entire page. Please continue discussing on the talk page, and feel free to make an edit request if necessary. Swarm 20:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

12 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 11:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP continuously adding erroneous wikimarkup. - Mlpearc (open channel) 13:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocking appears to have solved the problem for now. Mz7 (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 16:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure why this is temporary protected when trolls sweep in the moment the protection expires. . Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I'd usually never go this route, but the vandalism immediately starts at the expiration of the protection period. 6 months, a year hasn't worked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – We've now had multiple recreations of this article, in at least two forms. How many in total I can't really say. @RickinBaltimore: has just restored the latest as a redirect. Could we consider protecting the two redirects to avoid further article recreations? . Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've gone for semi-protection first; if an autoconformed editor recreates these, there are other ways to deal with it. Lectonar (talk) 20:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term semi-protection requested for persistent addition of deliberately false information (such as claims that the Kosovo Security Forcde has several hundred advanced armored vehicles, including M2 Bradley...) by multiple throw-away accounts and IPs. The article has previously been protected, but the protection expired on 31 March. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 17:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's slowly escalate this; please also report to AIV, perpetrating IP and the vandalising registered user might be the same person. Lectonar (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In the news due to being injured in a bomb, lots of unsourced edits. JMHamo (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from newly created accounts and IP addresses. Ravensfire (talk) 18:56, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

12 April 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IP users. Nickag989talk 19:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Request for vandalism on Twitch Stream. This has led to rapid vandalism. 2A02:C7D:8E71:7900:C927:B36A:9784:6638 (talk) 20:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sam Walton (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of Talk page – Trolling & posting nonsense discussions by socks of blocked User:HarveyCarter. I've also requested protection for the article itself below. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent trolling by socks of blocked User:HarveyCarter. I've also requested the protection of the Talk page separately. Trolling is occurring in both places. . K.e.coffman (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent pending changes: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing.

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: We have more than one IP involved. El_C 20:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Essentially one IP, the one ending on .174 had just one edit...and editing was not very heavy, and yesterday. Lectonar (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: My request was not based solely on today's reverted edits. Mitchumch (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by newly created socks or IP socks of Itskumudhk.  LeoFrank  Talk 16:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by newly created socks or IP socks of Itskumudhk.  LeoFrank  Talk 16:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant addition of unsourced and/or inaccurate material by IP addresses despite warnings being issued. JackOfPanTrades Converse intellectually 19:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 19:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism returns straight away. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. One person is repeatedly adding a huge, unsourced table full of extraordinarily unlikely award claims. User:Gwendy and I have tried to instigate discussion but the user responds by just creating new accounts to try to game 3RR. The repeated addition of an edit that's guaranteed to get immediately reverted is clogging up the pending changes log. CityOfSilver 14:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 14:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Employees of Burger King are rewriting portions of the page to fit with their new advertising campaign. See http://theverge.com/2017/4/12/15259400/burger-king-google-home-ad-wikipedia. GSK (tc) 16:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator The ed17. NeilN talk to me 18:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for one month. After long term persistent vandalism to Michael White (author) by socks of Azul411, protection was granted several times, including again just last week. I assumed this protection would extend to the talk page but it doesn't, and the talk page is now heavily vandalized: Revision History. Help is appreciated! -Darouet (talk) 17:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Favonian. NeilN talk to me 18:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinte Protection: The persistent Continuation of Adding Unsourced material. ZeEnergizer (talk) 18:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ritchie333. NeilN talk to me 19:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of poorly sourced trivia by multiple accounts; I've requested a block of the master account. 2601:188:1:AEA0:DD8E:74CD:FBC3:49C8 (talk) 18:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Told the one registered account to discuss. NeilN talk to me 19:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 11:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:19, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. 2605:6001:e04a:b900::/64 blocked 3 months NeilN talk to me 13:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced and unconfirmed rumors of marriage. 2601:188:1:AEA0:DD8E:74CD:FBC3:49C8 (talk) 12:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Now sourced. NeilN talk to me 13:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, edit war Fireflyfanboy (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Because I don't want it to go missing again:) . SARAH JEFFREY :) 06:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

@Bear 336:, I do not see any evidence it was ever created (or even that the page was created).--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Nom (Bear 336 (talk · contribs)) blocked indefinitely per WP:NOTHERE. Favonian (talk) 09:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, mostly malicious redirects by the same user hiding behind multiple IPs. Ajf773 (talk) 08:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Ajf773: Could you elucidate a bit please? We have an article at Clendon, and one at Clendon Park, both with the same coordinates....is it the same area? Either way, there are no sources in both articles. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: magic eight ball The hot beverage you requested's Magic 8-Ball says: Result hazy, try again later. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It appears another user has redirected in favour of the IP user (despite the IPs ongoing abuse of New Zealand related articles on Wikipedia). Withdrawing semi-protection request. Ajf773 (talk) 09:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 10:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, addition of non notable person by multiple IPs. 2601:188:1:AEA0:DD8E:74CD:FBC3:49C8 (talk) 13:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent event attracting vandals and NPOV; new users who haven';t read policy and do more harm than good. L3X1 (distant write) 21:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Can you point out recent disruptive activity? El_C 01:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 02:49, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, connected to the administration and liquidation of The Rangers Football Club Plc. Probably not a coincidence that the schools are on holiday. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Consistent and repeated vandalism over multiple different time periods. Antonioatrylia (talk) 10:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 12:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP´s. JimRenge (talk) 10:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @JimRenge: I have no idea if the indic script that was just added is accurate NeilN talk to me 12:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over last three days. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 11:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 11:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 12:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit war by ip users on nationality. (Per footy project discussion, he should display as Italian footballer, nothing else) Matthew_hk tc 07:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism from multiple socks. Qzd (talk) 08:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 10:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Hi level promotional level by SPA accounts associated with the company. HJDXC has been advised on their talk page about COI, but has recently edited the article. Extended-confirmed would prevent newly registered accounts from adding content to the article. . K.e.coffman (talk) 01:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am, in no way, trying to use Wikipedia as a promotional or marketing tool. My goal is to ensure our company's information is accurate and our brand is not compromised. Thank you for all your support, advice and most of all patience as I learn/read my way through Wikipedia. HJDXC (talk) 01:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please start with our conflict of interest policy. Hi, level! El_C 06:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Contentious AfD about the BLP at the centre of the United Airline incident with local consensus on talk page against including previous criminal activity. Already have a 3RR violation on the author, and another editors has begun reverting against consensus. . TonyBallioni (talk) 01:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)  Request withdrawn Edit warring appears to have ceased for now. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 03:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 03:22, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. IP directions vandalise the entry in order to make a point: (after identifying the wikipedia entry as the appropiate place) you can exercise your freedom of speech by making jokes of the man. Already protected in Wikidata and es:Wiki for the same reason. Asqueladd (talk) 23:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 01:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many vandalistic reversions. Jennica / talk 23:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the problem accounts are getting close to level 4 warnings or blocks, but we may want to protect anyway. EricEnfermero (Talk) 01:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. It's IExistToHelp talk 01:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – User has not edited since being blocked. Perhaps you meant a different user? Mz7 (talk) 01:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: There seems to be a new editor User:CindyRoleder (already has 100 edits) who does not add edit summaries to any of their edits and does not use the Talk page to discuss major edits. I and another editor have left a message for her on her Talk Page to use edit summaries, in general, and article talk pages to discuss edits since she is new, but this has not worked. On the article specifically, User:CindyRoleder and another editor, User:186.151.60.76, have been going back and forth with indirect reverts for a few days now. User:CindyRoleder is still not leaving any edit summaries and not using the talk page to discuss disputed edits, while the other editor has in at least a few instances. This is getting disruptive. Currently, another page (Demographics of atheism) is being protected for a few days due to User:CindyRoleder's disruptive edits there as well.Huitzilopochtli1990 (talk) 01:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Left warnings for User:CindyRoleder and 186.151.60.76 (talk · contribs). Blocks may be considered if this continues. EdJohnston (talk) 01:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet (talk) 01:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet (talk) 01:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP Continues to add disruptive content this getting ridiculous! . Digifan23 (talk) 03:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many vandalistic reversions. Jennica / talk 23:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: for two weeks. IP hopper who is not participating on the Talk page and just reverting. Jytdog (talk) 02:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of poorly-sourced content from IPs on open proxies. I'm about 90% sure it's an IP sock of User:Nate Speed. See also: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive950#Abusive/threatening IP. Some of these edits are from the same IP range. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 20:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially one IP. Lectonar (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: IP blocked by Widr.--Jetstreamer Talk 20:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Short semi-protection. It's April 12th in Korea, meaning it's this musician's birthday there; his page has seen several different kinds of bad edits related to his age and to a gift his fans bought for him. CityOfSilver 23:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Most edits subsequent to the expiration of the previous 3-month semi- have been TFD vandalism and reversions thereof. --Finngall talk 23:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being targeted by ip vandal [21]. CopernicusAD (u) (t) :) 00:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  12:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lot's of information still being sorted out. A lot of editing being done and reverted. . Alexf505 (talk) 16:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see much disruptive editing. Seems well under control. Lectonar (talk) 20:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biography of Suzanne Olsson has been on Wiki for 9 years...always having problems with insertion of untrue tabloid-like articles disputed repeatedly by the author. This results in sock-puppet wars, editing wars, and actually puts the author's life physically in danger, and her DNA Project on the brink of failure. The Wiki editors just dont seem to understand how their comments and "sources" for information are viewed overseas. Recently Olsson laid out very well the mis-information and wrong dates, and yet was knocked down again- Wiki editors refusing to correct their own articles. Please help. Thank You Bambi2017 (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Bambi2017Bambi2017 (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed formatting/link. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ToThAc (talk) 23:19, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Mz7 (talk) 23:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 11:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP continuously adding erroneous wikimarkup. - Mlpearc (open channel) 13:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocking appears to have solved the problem for now. Mz7 (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 16:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure why this is temporary protected when trolls sweep in the moment the protection expires. . Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I'd usually never go this route, but the vandalism immediately starts at the expiration of the protection period. 6 months, a year hasn't worked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – We've now had multiple recreations of this article, in at least two forms. How many in total I can't really say. @RickinBaltimore: has just restored the latest as a redirect. Could we consider protecting the two redirects to avoid further article recreations? . Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've gone for semi-protection first; if an autoconformed editor recreates these, there are other ways to deal with it. Lectonar (talk) 20:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term semi-protection requested for persistent addition of deliberately false information (such as claims that the Kosovo Security Forcde has several hundred advanced armored vehicles, including M2 Bradley...) by multiple throw-away accounts and IPs. The article has previously been protected, but the protection expired on 31 March. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 17:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's slowly escalate this; please also report to AIV, perpetrating IP and the vandalising registered user might be the same person. Lectonar (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In the news due to being injured in a bomb, lots of unsourced edits. JMHamo (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from newly created accounts and IP addresses. Ravensfire (talk) 18:56, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

13 April 2017

Semi-protection: IP's removing sourced content almost daily and trying to change the birthplace of the individual despite the multiple citations. The fact that these are IP's means they never use the talk page. Damien2016 (talk) 15:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Damien2016:, per the cited reference "Born in a little-known village, Bhardah, in Saptari district in the Terai plains of Nepal...". Why are you reverting this change? caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure the source has been changed, he self-identifies as having been born in Baisi of Supaul district:

http://www.bihartimes.in/Newsbihar/2009/Jan/Newsbihar15Jan12.html

http://www.mid-day.com/articles/udit-narayans-citizenship-questioned/28090

http://www.saavn.com/s/artist/udit-narayan-bio/kLtmb7Vh8Rs_

Even the saavn.com lists him as Nepalese. I'll update the article to indicate his birthplace is disputed. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Content dispute sorted out. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 17:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Long-term semi-protection requested because of an IP-hopper who regularly (see page history) vandalises the article, removing content and adding all kinds of invectives and insults to it. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 13:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This annual festival will be celebrated within the next few days, and the article is witnessing traffic/vandalism spike. Persistent removal of sources, sourced content and plugs by hopping IPs. Requesting one week temp semi-protection through April 20, or whatever makes sense in such cases. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:35, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent anonymous IP edits and reverts, totaling upwards of 15 instances in the past 2 weeks alone. Article also seems to be experiencing a lot of speculation and unsourced edits on the subject's birth name, religion and ethnicity. Until there is any sources cited, it is best to leave it blank. Otherwise, we fall in a situation where we cannot differentiate between which is authentic but original research and what's plain misleading or vandalism. DA1 (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Short-term semi-protection: Recent death. Slasher405 (talk) 21:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: vandalism, content disputes/warring, disruptive editing. Jbindoma (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 09:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There are currently two bands active under the Yes name and editors have yet to reach an agreement on how to address this problem. Fekso (talk) 12:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protection may well be in order, but do note that this user is an obvious sock-puppet. Joefromrandb (talk) 12:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad to let you know this is not the case. For what reason would I not be a genuine user? What difference would it make to the point I'm trying to make? If you check my log you will find my account has been around since August 14th 2014. Furthermore, if this even would be a problem, I would be glad to provide all accounts and IP addresses I make edits under. This account split is due to Wikipedia not allowing users crossing over between the different language based sites before circa 2014. I am a well known user on the Swedish Wikipedia. All the best! Fekso (talk) 13:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect: This organization is the subject of a political witchhunt in Turkey (see https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/magazine/inside-turkeys-purge.html or 2016–17 Turkish purges) resulting in constant unhelpful edits by IPs and sock accounts, often in broken English. Can't suggest a time frame as the IRL cause of the vandalism is ongoing indefinitely. TiC (talk) 20:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too unfequently changed for semi--Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking. ɯɐɔ 💬 16:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 16:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – addition of unsourced content has continues via other IP address, after the expiration of the temporary PC. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 16:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:09, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Instances of vandalism, album name change, artist name changes; IP editors trying to change the stylization of the track listing when there's a note put in place, which is being ignored. Jennica / talk 19:26, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 20:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Due to this and the two follow-ups. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 1989 16:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 19:11, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recent uptick in source-contradicting changes to Pichai's birthplace and nationality. McGeddon (talk) 17:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This article seems to be a common target for vandals, so I went straight to semi-protection. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting pending changes protection for two weeks, as this article will generate a lot of disruptive activity which has already begun. GoneIn60 (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TwoTwoHello (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalizing pages (see Wikipedia:Edit_filter/Requested#Gonzo.2FTrump_2020). EvergreenFir (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
18:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeatedly recreated for promotional purposes. Cahk (talk) 07:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: How is protection going to fix that issue, Cahk? Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It should probably be salted. Cahk's rationale fits that well, and I agree with it. John from Idegon (talk) 16:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Indef-full-salt by Athaenara. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection, and please KEEP the full-admin-move-protection, due to disruption, and addition of unsourced content, from lots of incomers because of highly-trafficked incident. Sagecandor (talk) 14:21, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Coffee (1 month). -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Nthep (1 day). -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:04, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This bio need some sort of protection. someone close to subject was editing the page. 119.160.116.13 (talk) 05:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – This template is used when quantifying the numbers of things, and there is no need for this template to be changed. UpsandDowns1234 (Talk to me) (My Contribs) 06:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – capacity in dispute. Jbindoma (talk) 09:09, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 12:09, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal is deliberately circumventing semi-protection; see history of User:Hmonglames for elucidation. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: There have been reverts this year, probably vandalism. --George Ho (talk) 09:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 12:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I suspect a bunch of students got on here. Could we have a temporary protection until this blows over. TheDragonFire (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from an IP and a recently-created login user tha is clearly the same person. Jetstreamer Talk 14:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting upgrade from PC to semi. VQuakr (talk) 03:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It looks as if PC is working. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite protection:' High level of false information is being written about Mean Streak and what Cedar Point is doing with it. Requesting that this page is protected until Cedar Point makes an announcement about it. MitchellLunger (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:CRYSTAL edits by non-fixed IP editor. UW Dawgs (talk) 05:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., edited too infrequently for semi-protection, and some IP edits are good--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TheKaphox T 21:39, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Can you point out recent disruptive activity? El_C 01:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: - Examples one, two, three. Thanks. --Jennica / talk 05:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Compared to the sheer volume of edits, I'm just not seeing that much disruption. Yes, there's the single matter of the all-CAPS, but that seems more like users not familiar with the style standard. And it should be expected if the album lists the tracks in all-CAPS. Now you have the hidden note, we'll see if that helps. El_C 05:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:17, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:33, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – User refuses to discuss on talk page and has already violated 3RR rule on the page. Adding unsourced content. Adamgerber80 (talk) 04:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Possible vandalism by users Hejiaheng99 and 107.77.214.6. Poem (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going addition of unsourced content by IPs and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 22:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been subject to numerous instances of vandalism and disruptive editing. Joeyconnick (talk) 22:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent high level of IP vandalism . NicklausAU (talk) 20:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 21:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The page needs to be protected again, as the disruptive editing by Polish IP hopper continues. Disembodied Soul (talk) 23:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent non-constructive edits . Onel5969 TT me 01:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 13:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months-, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ongoing longterm disruption. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 22:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14 April 2017

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. FranciscoMG (talk) 14:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @FranciscoMG: This page has never been created. Please check the title. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, assuming this was a test edit. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by an IP hopper. Tompop888 (talk) (contribs) 15:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also the recent IPs have been range blocked for two weeks. Acroterion (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of sourced content and sources by "just created" SPA, IPs, etc. This traditional new year of Tamil people is this week, and the article is seeing a spike in viewer/flyby editing traffic. Requesting a temp semi-protection for 48 hours, or whatever is appropriate. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 15:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 15:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism . Jennica / talk 03:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 04:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 04:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werewolf Hologram. Winged Blades Godric 07:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I do not see any recent evidence of disruption.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. 1989 15:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Doug Weller talk 07:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Indeffed user w/o talk page privileges appears to be back as multiple IPs removing declined block request. Promises to return daily here Jim1138 (talk) 08:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Now that The Italian Job (2003 film) has been placed under ECP, this appears the new Cat Creek LTA target. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mifter. Vanamonde (talk) 04:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same sock as before. Grayfell (talk) 03:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2A00:6D40:60:704C:0:0:0:1 (talk) 04:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—Try using the article talk page first. El_C 23:17, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 22:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:29, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined—Not seeing it. El_C 23:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive edits by IP adding unsourced score writer (note that name being added died a decade prior to film release). ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 01:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of sourced content by IPs. Grayfell (talk) 01:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A few instances of vandalism, a lot of unsourced and new material being added by various IPs and users due to events currently unfolding online. Requesting a short-term semi-protection until events unfold and there are sources that can be cited on it. —TheAnonymousNerd (talkcontribs) 02:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite protection: High level of biased edit wars from two competing companies, polygraph and cvsa. Protection would help the page be balanced and hinder vandalism Azar8991 (talk) 14:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @Azar8991: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 23:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection or Extended: Content dispute/edit warring. 1989 15:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 23:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. 1989 15:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 23:08, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: can we have a short-term protection here until the kids at the library get bored and move on to something else?. John from Idegon (talk) 15:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—Just one user today. Better warn, and block if needed. El_C 23:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – information could not be verified without reliable sources. Jbindoma (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The article is two days old, and, indeed, full of unsourced info but the problem is it never had sourced info. If nothing can be verified, it should go to AfD, not to stay protected in the current state.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, trolling of editors, disruptive editing, abuse, threats to continue attacking this page even after being blocked, deliberate targeting of anyone who reverts vandalism on this page etc 82.132.240.130 (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined per intentional trolling. Beyond My Ken is welcome to ask instead. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see this until I had filed the request below. Since the IP troll says they have access to this IP address for 36 hours, perhaps a 36 hour block would be a good idea? Semi-protection for the inevitable follow-ups would also be appreciated. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Today's Featured Article, should be protected to prevent vandalism currently happening en masse. Lordtobi () 16:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done We don't protect the TFA unless the vandalism is egregious. Not the case here. Katietalk 20:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15 April 2017

Create protection: Offensive name. Kostas20142 (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sam Walton (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP trolling. Ignoring mass reversions. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 14:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Sam Walton (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Under attack by Indian nationalist vandals. KMF (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 18:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple and constant IP editors ignoring hidden notes that display guidelines against updating yet until season has premiered. -- AlexTW 09:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As usual IPs are speculating. Qed237 (talk) 09:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - Indefinite if possible. Harassment from IP editors ḾỊḼʘɴίcảTalkI DX for fun! 14:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the problem returns we can extend the protection, but indefinite is extremely rare.Ad Orientem (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism; controversial title makes it a perpetual target Joefromrandb (talk) 03:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 03:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual vandalism . NicklausAU (talk) 07:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – A user named 'Signedzzz' has repeatedly edited this article which appears to be heavily slanted, and/or using sources that aren't entirely reliable. Please refer to recent edit history below:

(cur | prev) 03:56, 15 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,919 bytes) (+126)‎ . . (→‎September–December 2016: per ref) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 03:44, 15 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (63,793 bytes) (+3)‎ . . (→‎September–December 2016: WP:CLAIM) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 03:37, 15 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,790 bytes) (+107)‎ . . (→‎September–December 2016) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 21:59, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,683 bytes) (-100)‎ . . (restore unexplained deletions) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 21:51, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,783 bytes) (-585)‎ . . (→‎top: That's nice, but please dont edit uunless you are improving the encyclopedia in some way. Please read Drug policy, it says exactly what you pointlessly added.) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 10:27, 14 April 2017‎ Agila81 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,368 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (undo) (cur | prev) 10:19, 14 April 2017‎ Agila81 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,369 bytes) (+686)‎ . . (I don't support Duterte nor do I support EJK's. Please leave it at this. This is supposed to be neutral) (undo) (cur | prev) 05:59, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,683 bytes) (+5)‎ . . (→‎Background) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 05:14, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (63,678 bytes) (0)‎ . . (→‎Police campaign components: no space between refs) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 05:11, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (63,678 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (→‎Police campaign components) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 05:09, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,679 bytes) (-75)‎ . . (→‎Police campaign components) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 05:00, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,754 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (→‎top) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:59, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,755 bytes) (+31)‎ . . (→‎top) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:56, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,724 bytes) (0)‎ . . (→‎top) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:55, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (63,724 bytes) (+5)‎ . . (→‎top) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:46, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (63,719 bytes) (+9)‎ . . (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:45, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (63,710 bytes) (-480)‎ . . (?) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:44, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,190 bytes) (-87)‎ . . (CTRL "drug". No result. Dont take the piss, please) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:40, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,277 bytes) (-38)‎ . . (→‎top: CTRL "drugs" in Armed Forces of the Philippines, and you get one sole link to this page here. No info, nothing. This is a neutral encyclopedia. (Not wtf some users obviously think.)) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:32, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,315 bytes) (-24)‎ . . (→‎top: source?) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:30, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,339 bytes) (-110)‎ . . (→‎top: rmv pointless rewording by EJK fans) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:28, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,449 bytes) (-37)‎ . . (→‎top: nope) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:27, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,486 bytes) (-452)‎ . . (MOS:INFOBOXFLAG) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:21, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,938 bytes) (+60)‎ . . (→‎top) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:14, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,878 bytes) (-11)‎ . . (→‎top: rmv dead link) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:10, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (64,889 bytes) (+4)‎ . . (→‎top) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:09, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (64,885 bytes) (0)‎ . . (→‎top) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:08, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,885 bytes) (+183)‎ . . (→‎top: more refs) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:02, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (64,702 bytes) (0)‎ . . (→‎top: move - police are state-sponsored) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 04:00, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,702 bytes) (+172)‎ . . (police death squads + ref) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 03:55, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (64,530 bytes) (+13)‎ . . (→‎top: dab) (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 03:47, 14 April 2017‎ Signedzzz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (64,517 bytes) (-38)‎ . . (→‎top: manufacturers? No, We need RS confirming the focus on manufacturers. There are none. £50k of supposed equipment displayed before invited members of press? No chance) (undo | thank). Agila81 (talk) 08:08, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, we do not protect articles against one editor. If they are problematic, sanctions should be against the editor, not against the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

16 April 2017

Extended confirmed protection: To prevent further edit warring. I reported to WP:ANI#Blanking without participating in a discussion by SaripBB. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 05:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 06:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's adding some sour grapes about US-restaurants not getting Michelin stars while they - in their opinion - deserve them. The Banner talk 09:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, we do not protect articles against a single user. Try WP:3RRN if they persist.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Page protection ended two days ago and as soon as it did, the IP-hopping, POV-pushing vandal returned. Two IPs have been blocked just today. Article needs long-term protection. The Old JacobiteThe '45 12:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TheOldJacobite: Is there a reason why semi-protection or extended-confirmed protection wouldn't be adequate? Rebbing 12:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, there is no reason. That was an error on my part as a result of submitting the report too quickly. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 14:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection due to edit warring and disruption by anonymous editors. Rebbing 12:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cahk (talk) 08:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 09:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Sock of vandalizing this article since they are unable to edit Coimbatore International Airport. But given the sock has now crossed the threshold to be auto-confirmed, requesting an extended confirmed protection.  LeoFrank  Talk 08:22, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 09:31, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The page should be reverted back to this redirect as the majority of the article remains unsourced and because there is not enough information and relevance for a standalone article the remaning information has been transfered to BC CSKA Sofia, where it still remains and currently because of the protection is duplicated. The user who is constantly reverting the edits appears to know little english and my attempts to explain to him that this is one and the same club are unsuccessful so far.--The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 16:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I still see no discussion at the talk page and a bunch of reverts in the history.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, the protection expired--Ymblanter (talk) 09:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by User:The abominable Wiki troll, semi-protection is not working. Sro23 (talk) 00:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 00:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 08:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 09:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Like Alex Jones (radio host), as the subject of this article gains popularity, it will attract reads and edits from uninitiated editors, such as those who want to assert that he's telling some form of truth or falsehood (rather than describe him with a neutral point of view) or remove descriptions they disagree with (such as "conspiracy theorist" or "journalist"). Semi-protection will avoid disruption and encourage discussion before changes. BurritoBazooka Talk Contribs 10:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: several IPs believed to be the subject, page author, and socks atre making bad !votes, some directly copied out of prev nom. L3X1 (distant write) 01:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – If bad arguments are being made in the discussion, they will be given less weight by the closing administrator. Overall, I'm not seeing enough disruptive editing here to justify semi-protection. Mz7 (talk) 04:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeatedly created promo article. Cahk (talk) 07:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done by SoWhy. Materialscientist (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 08:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 09:02, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 09:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own space. None of these need to be edited by IPs. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined — None are likely to be edited by IPs, either. El_C 00:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection or Semi-protection: Persistent vandlism (such as this edit) and occasional unhelpful good faith edits (such as this edit). Of all edits made starting on April 4, only two edits which were not reversions of unhelpful edits have been made: (this edit) and (this edit). Every unhelpful edit was performed by an IP or new editor. For this reason, I would suggest semi-protection, except that the occasional good edit sometimes comes from an IP or new editor. Likewise, I would suggest pending changes protection, except for the high edit count. However, I think that the page should be protected somehow to avoid persistent unhelpful edits. Noah Kastin (talk) 01:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I realized a few points that I forgot to mention in my initial suggestion:
  1. The first helpful edit I mentioned (this one) was made by an IP editor. This is largely what the pending changes suggestion is based on.
  2. All content reversions of unhelpful edits were made by autoconfirmed users, except for this content reversion. Note that the user who did this content reversion also wrote the content they reverted in this edit.
  3. Club Penguin Island recently came out, beginning on the same day that Club Penguin ended (see Club Penguin#Club Penguin Island). As Club Penguin Island apparently just replaced Club Penguin, Club Penguin Island seems to be suffering from negativity by players who preferred Club Penguin to Club Penguin Island, which in turn may cause unusual amounts of unhelpful edits to the Club Penguin Island page. This may mean that, once Club Penguin Island has been out for a while, the anti-Club Penguin Island sentiment may decrease, the unhelpful edits may decrease, and the page protection may no longer be necessary.
Hopefully these few points should help provide useful background for the proposal, and assist in making a decision.
Noah Kastin (talk) 04:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Like you, I was unsure whether to apply semi-protection or pending changes (or no protection at all). I would actually say the editing rate is on the low side for semi-protection. The recent uptick in edits over the past few days is mostly the result of two or three users. For now, I've applied pending changes protection to the article – we'll see how this goes, and feel free to let me know or re-report here if you feel that it is not working. Mz7 (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Mz7, for protecting Club Penguin Island!
Also thanks for letting me know that "the editing rate is on the low side for semi-protection"; the protection policy says that "Pending changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high edit rate", but I didn't know what "a very high edit rate" counts as.
I will make sure to let you know if I feel that the protection is not working.
Thanks again!
Noah Kastin (talk) 05:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive drive-by IP reverts. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term target/magnet for vandalism. Lengthy semi-protection encouraged here. 172.58.43.187 (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – AfD ended in redirect. IPs have reverted this 3 times in 2 days. Boleyn (talk) 05:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: No need for this page to be edited unless if a glitch is found. UpsandDowns1234 (Talk to me) (My Contribs) 06:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. El_C 07:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 03:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 04:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wheel vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:32, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death hoax is afoot, no RS support. General Ization Talk 04:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple BLP violations (based on common misunderstanding), mainly by IPs and new users. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:16, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – highly visible at moment. WNYY98 (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Thehelpfulone 22:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated posts by sockpuppets pushing a POV. Main article already protected - request temporary Semi protection hoping that they get the message. Exemplo347 (talk) 23:57, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With the rumors of a 5th studio album dropping, there has been some vandalism. it went undetected for hours. Jennica / talk 02:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of promotional language by an undisclosed COI-editor with dynamic IPs. Requests to discuss an alternative encyclopedic phrasing on the article's talkpage and various IP talkpages have been ignored. GermanJoe (talk) 11:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be doing the trick for this article, can we up the protection level to auto-confirmed? (re all the oh-so-clever vandals who keep on adding Ted Cruz to the article). Shearonink (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent long-term vandalism by an anonymous editor using multiple IPs to repeatedly make edits to the page that directly contradict the page title, itself, without explanation beyond reverting and editwarring.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Used to by-pass create protection at Kenny Browne. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 00:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced anon edits that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 21:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, since 26 March.[22] Kansas Bear (talk) 21:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:45, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 22:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent spell of disruptive editing adding Matthew Gallagher / xMattyG to drivers list. Matthew Gallagher was a recent A7/G11 CSD. Jake Brockman (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 18:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – ip jumper continues to be disruptive. Digifan23 (talk) 13:11, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 18:43, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – TV Land vandal has spilled over into others pages like this on . Digifan23 (talk) 13:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 18:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: long-term promo magnet, deleted multiple times, borderline/non N accruing promo from COI / SPA editors - see WP:COIN. Widefox; talk 14:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 18:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple new accounts and IP address editors vandalising the article. -=Troop=- (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 18:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – highly visible due to status as a potential #1 pick in upcoming nfl draft (april 27-29). WNYY98 (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Mz7 (talk) 18:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:52, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Protection applied at Battle of Mount Tabor (biblical) and Battle of Mount Tabor (1799). caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Per discussion with User:BU Rob13, reducing protection on Battle of Mount Tabor (1799) to one month, removing protection from Battle of Mount Tabor (biblical). caknuck ° needs to be running more often 00:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-hopper has been edit-warring and trolling on the article for two months (since 14 February); returned immediately when previous protection expired. Softlavender (talk) 14:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kellymoat (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent [WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Disruptive and non-constructive edits that effectively reverted a large amount of work on improving this article.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 18:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of unsourced content from anons. Blake Gripling (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only four total edits in the last 4 weeks. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. Let's see what comes of the ANI report. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 17:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is still being subject to multiple instances of IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Joeyconnick (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many vandal IPs. KMF (talk) 20:53, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created 4 times, and no one protected it?. UpsandDowns1234 (Talk to me) (My Contribs) 21:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name. UpsandDowns1234 (Talk to me) (My Contribs) 16:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. The user doesn't exist and there hasn't been any edits to the page it appears. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – And copyvio, probably sockpuppetry. Quasar G t - c 18:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also blocked one of the offending accounts. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism/sockpuppetry – Please see WP:LTA/CCCC. Lower levels of protection won't be helpful because the user makes null userpage edits to obtain autoconfirmed status; please see the history of The Italian Job (2003 film) as an example. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. I'm tired of lions in the oil field. How one person can spend that much effort for such a lame thing is beyond me. MikeTango (talk) 19:07, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Edgar181. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This page must be protected again, we have IP chaos, as well as some probably sock's anyway, it should be protected just look at the history, its mess!!. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 11:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Wisdom of the Ancients (talk · contribs) blocked by NeilN. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One week semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism to the ownership parameter due to on-going playoffs. Likely will pass in one weeks time. Yosemiter (talk) 17:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:07, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:02, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like a long term problem.Ad Orientem (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long-term, repeated section blanking by IP-hopper. Toddst1 (talk) 18:02, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not seeing evidence that is a long term problem and there is no history of earlier PP so I'm going with 1 week. If the problem returns come back and we can extend the PP. Indefinite is very rarely used. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent block evasion by User:Unkownzero. Sro23 (talk) 18:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is very aggressive disruptive editing that has been going on for a while. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks are back again: [23] and [24].  LeoFrank  Talk 18:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Previously ZinBro Messenger - i.e. different capitalisation. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 08:46, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Which was declined, because I did not notice that the WP:SALT was needed on two seperate pages, since the original author changed the capitalisation. Best, Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 08:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Nicnote:, yes, and each of them was only created once. Why do you think protection would help?--Ymblanter (talk) 10:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: I'd like to assume blocking both will block the topic as a whole (which has been repetedly re-created as unambiguous advertising). Historically both a user block and page block are done in tandem, under admin discretion, but User:Muhsinpms has some recent valid non-vandal edits. I just thought I would re-represent the case, since I didn't notice the caps difference when initially sumbitting it for your evaluation. Best, Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 16:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism, previously protected. WNYY98 (talk) 16:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding promotional material. KMF (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip hopping school vandal. WNYY98 (talk) 17:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:05, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection persistent vandalism from sock --Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Widr. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 17:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism to infobox. -- AlexTW 14:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. KMF (talk) 17:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 17:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Heyxx sockpuppets attacking page. WNYY98 (talk) 17:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done by KrakatoaKatie. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 17:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. The 2017 contest has not even started, and already IP's are vandalising the 2018 article with their "preferred" withdrawals, and speculative and unsourced assumptions. Wes Wolf Talk 13:08, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Luigi Boy ルアイヂ ボイ talk 13:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Top prospect in the 2017 NFL Draft, which is ten days away. Disruptive vandalism is already picking up, and gonna get much worse is the draft comes closer. The draft ends April 29, please semi-protect until this day. --bender235 (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:46, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One week Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism due to on-going playoffs. Likely will pass in one weeks time Yosemiter (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry (Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Iloveartrock) Ilovetopaint (talk) 11:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (both articles) caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 12:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – article subject makes it target for vandalism . WNYY98 (talk) 15:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SPARKZY 15:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 16:25, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rotating IPs repeating same unsourced edits. Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:38, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection Currently under pending changes protection. This article is under persistent vandalism to add links to a phishing scam. Five year old dormant accounts are starting to make these edits now. Semi-protection won't work. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 10:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit rate too high for pc. WNYY98 (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 16:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of edit wars. Azar8991 (talk) 15:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 16:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – WP:Editnotice says that editnotices for other namespaces can be created and edited by administrators only. UpsandDowns1234 (🗨) (My Contribs) 16:33, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. El_C 17:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wonder what triggered that... El_C 18:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
El_C. Template:Editnotices is a redirect to Wikipedia:Editnotice. You got redirected there and protected it instead. I clicked on the history link above to check and see if I could figure out why the bot had made the comment. I saw it wasn't protected, so protected it and then saw that it was a redirect. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – just got suspended by mlb for steroid use drawing vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, reversions without discussion, threats to block this user, citing non-existent Wikipedia policies as grounds for authority. Disregards assuming good faith. Aggressive, disruptive removal of edits and contents without discussion!. StephenTS42 (talk) 22:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: StephenTS42 (talk · contribs) blocked by Black Kite. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Deli nk (talk) 17:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

20 April 2017

Temporary pending changes: There have been recent unsourced additions lately, which have been reverted. George Ho (talk) 14:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several instances of vandalism over the past week. Lepricavark (talk) 15:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: It is a biography of a living person and should therefore be protected. Many false changes occured in the past few weeks.92.209.62.219 (talk) 16:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BLPs are not automatically protected. Lectonar (talk) 16:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Especially in the last 24 hours. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – very few productive anon edits. WNYY98 (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated by three different accounts for an organisation with no evidence of notability. Blythwood (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 20:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term disruption as shown by protection log. WNYY98 (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Despite the pending changes protection, still disruptive editing from IPs. . Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. BilCat (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

20 April 2017

Indefinite create protection: Meaningless title. UpsandDowns1234 (🗨) (My Contribs) 16:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @UpsandDowns1234: These useless protection requests are becoming disruptive. Stop it. NeilN talk to me 16:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for letting me know. I will only protect a page if it is repeatedly created. UpsandDowns1234 (🗨) (My Contribs) 16:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Saqib (talk) 20:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 20:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same old nonsense that cause the page to be protected last month. Strange case of random IPs edit warring with self. —Farix (t | c) 19:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article about a 2008 Indian movie that all of a sudden has become the target of multiple IPs and throw-away accounts adding insults against the producer/writer/main male star of the movie (Kamaal Rashid Khan, protected above), along the lines of calling him a "c*ck-sucker", though not in English... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP has been told to go to the talk page several times. A semi-protection it'll encourage the IP to participate in the talk page discussions. I also suggest a lengthy semi-protection since this has been a issue for quite from time now. Étienne Dolet (talk) 17:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. High level? I see 4 disruptive edits in april, and even less before. Lectonar (talk) 19:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Film is about to release publicly soon and just had its premiere. Some disruptive editing has begun on the article. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We can upgrade to semi when it picks up; please relist in that case. Lectonar (talk) 19:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: One editor on a varying IP insists on inserting a copyrighted essay into this article. Diannaa just semi-prot'ed it a few weeks ago, and when it wore off, the copyvios resumed. So a longer Semi-prot is probably warranted, or maybe PC1 so as not to cut off Ip editors entirely, though admins should watch the page so as to revdel the copyvios. Speaking of which, Revision 776373548 needs RD1 suppression as well. CrowCaw 17:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Approaching presidential election; please protect until past 23 April. Mélencron (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Not much disruption until now. Lectonar (talk) 14:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Despite long threads on the talk page, the editors continue to edit war. There's a new case at the DRN so hopefully matters would be resolved in a few days but until then I request some protection. Yashovardhan (talk) 18:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the DRN thread reaches a resolution before then I have no problems with the protection being lifted early. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editors have been fighting over redirecting the page and starting the page. The article doesn't have significant coverage at the moment, and currently fails WP:NM. FanofMusic (Talk to Me!) 18:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please try to develop a consensus on the talk page regarding the creation of the article; when that's completed, the protection can be lifted. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism adding incorrect team squads and general disruption. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Very new article, still worked on and so very much under control by experienced editors. Disruption level is not very high for the moment. Lectonar (talk) 13:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 16:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP (v4 which is dynamic starting with 177, and having different numbers after that, mostly 30 for the second number in recent edits) is persistently removing similar content without explanation. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(1) Temporary semi-protection: Bill O'Reilly and his show have attracted a lot of attention lately, and a lot of edits have been made and reverted with the addition of references; especially the notable guests section. . Alexf505 (talk) 16:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(2) Temporary MOVE-full-protection: Request MOVE PROTECTION also, due to page-move-warring and disruption related to same, and to instead facilitate discussion of page move instead of registered users resorting to page-move-warring and disruption. Thanks ! Sagecandor (talk) 16:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Not enough disruption for a semi yet. NeilN talk to me 16:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mooeena (talk) 16:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent of new user vandalism (possibly from the same real person). Fizikanauk (talk) 16:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism on our current POTUS. ɯɐɔ 💬 16:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – persistent adition of defamatory content by various IPs. Kostas20142 (talk) 17:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Vanamonde (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Vandalized once or twice a month. --George Ho (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ToThAc (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 16:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —MRD2014 📞 contribs 15:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Geni. Lectonar (talk) 16:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 15:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP hopping vandal. BilCat (talk) 16:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping disruptive editor returned as soon as the last protection expired. Deli nk (talk) 13:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping disruptive editor returned as soon as the last protection expired. Deli nk (talk) 13:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 14:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: This page has just been recently moved to this title, and I am afraid that someone will quickly attempt to start a request of their own to move the page back to Sia Furler, its original title. This happened two years ago, and I want to prevent this from happening again. While I would prefer a permanent move protection, I would be okay if this page was move protected for a month or two. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:41F0:3E3B:4B4B:25FA (talk) 23:22, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Declined, it is semi-protected anyway, and we do not protect pages pre-emptively.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection The user Rui Gabriel Correia removed a content saying it was wrong, and after sources has been added at the removed content, he keep reverting. For I don't do the fourth reversion, I ask for page protection with the last stable version to obligate the user to use the talk page to explain why that sourced statement is wrong.--Luizdl Talk 07:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @Luizdl: Nobody forces you to revert again (and again); the other user has already started a discussion on the talk-page of the article, so feel free to weigh in there. Consider yourself warned that you are edit-warring. Lectonar (talk) 07:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A shifting IP repeatedly over-promoting the same 2010 project and ignoring talk page conversation. McGeddon (talk) 09:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Home Lander (talk) 02:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected That should be enough for now; vandalism was coming from IPs. Lectonar (talk) 07:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – That time of year again. Moxy (talk) 02:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Farix (t | c) 04:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Joeyconnick (talk) 01:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute by 2 recently created SPAs who are fighting, EW (but not 3rr) and refusing to use talk page. L3X1 (distant write) 02:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism going back months. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and repeated addition of WP:ROUTINE or non-notable content by anons and newly-registered users. Perhaps giving an indef semi or pending changes would deter them somehow. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism as well as few new accounts. Unsourced changes in box office numbers, and disruptive edits. Its been a while. 112.133.236.160 (talk) 05:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Google homepage (www.google.com) is linking to her on 4-18-2017 resulting in vandalism and page blanking every few minutes JDowning (talk) 16:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @JDowning: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Since January 2016, it has receive only one minor positive edit. 49 others revisions were vandalism and anti-vandalism. This page has matured. No one seems to want to genuinely edit it. So, I say locking it down permanently can only be a positive thing. Codename Lisa (talk) 17:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Suddenly under so much IP attack I can't tell if any of them are actually trying to fix the mess. CityOfSilver 00:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations. May merit a nice rev/del. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP inserting false information (or at least wildly implausible and unsourced) that this Israeli missile is used by Morocco. Insertion of false information began at least in 2014 - [25]. It keeps on being returned. It has also managed to propagate into other langauge wikis (Russian and Arabic). The Arabic seems to be directly modified by the IP editor in parallel to the English vandalism. The Russian seems like propagation of false information from the English. Talk page requests (and previously source requests) - ignored. Note that whomever is propagating this hoax is persistent - he has been returning this for the past three years - [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]. Icewhiz (talk) 12:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I will watchlist; the disruption is persistent, but rather low-levelish. Lectonar (talk)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 06:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Within namespace. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 21:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. No need exists. See WP:UPPROT. --MelanieN (talk) 01:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page is suffering from "revert wars", and unregistered IPs are consistently making changes with no explanation or with politically charged explanations. Tannlos (talk) 00:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The article is being very heavily edited, but some IPs and new users are making constructive changes so I hesitate to protect. There appears to be edit warring over the infobox, but I don't see a pattern of serious vandalism. MelanieN (talk) 01:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially one IP. Lectonar (talk) 22:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of non-notable by multiple accounts. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 22:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I understand; I hit them hard with warnings, in part because I thought the same editor had returned with several different accounts. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated attempts to add WP:YELLOWPAGES type material. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 01:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary, semi-protection: Bio of a mountaineer who seems to have annoyed the local climbing community. Created and maintained by a series of SPAs, and now a series of throw away accounts are making rather negative edits. Requesting protection to prevent further edit warring while article content and COI issues looked at. Meters (talk) 23:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that this will not stop all the edit warring, since some participants are autoconfirmed. Also, I am disappointed to see that there has been no attempt so far to discuss the issues at the talk page. . MelanieN (talk) 01:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 00:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism resumed immediately upon expiration of the previous protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – the recording's release date appears to have changed, but no source is being provided. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Iloveartrock. Binksternet (talk) 18:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has required protection repeatedly in recent months. MelanieN (talk) 01:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Iloveartrock. Binksternet (talk) 22:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:10, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Changing these values can cause my user pages to turn, obstructing the Wikipedia logo and making the text unreadable if 180 degrees around. UpsandDowns1234 (🗨) (My Contribs) 18:14, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—Reason for semiprotection unclear. El_C 20:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 19:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 20:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Edit war over content dispute, request one week protection to allow consensus to develop. GregJackP Boomer! 19:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • GregJackP is the only editor disputing the content and appears to have made 4 reverts. QuackGuru (talk) 20:01, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not correct, there are several people involved on the talk page, most of whom want to discuss the matter before sections are just blanked, like you have done. GregJackP Boomer! 20:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined—I'm already on it via AN3. El_C 20:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: disruptive editing, Vandalism (proven information text was removed in random areas of biography, and rude text added in other areas), Bullying comments done by different Anonymous users and IP addresses several times the past 2 months. The edits weren't reversed automatically by wikipedia watch-bots, we just saw them today. Updates336699 20:01, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 20:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has seen persistent vandalism both by IPs but also by new users (see page history). These often have had to be reverted but there also have been some that subtly went unnoticed. Geo talk 20:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We only protect country articles in severe instances. El_C 20:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary, semi-protection: Edit-warring from an apparently dynamic ip with bad-faith edit summaries adding unverified info about a living person. Ronz (talk) 22:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing anti-Semitic removal of cited material. Pending changes hasn't made the slightest bit of difference in preventing it. There are BLP concerns as the family is very much alive. DuncanHill (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Checked Semi-protected indef. I looked through the past 500 edits, which only takes it back a year. Some of this is content dispute, but there are a lot of BLP issues and hostilities related to the Holocaust. I don't see this going away in my lifetime, so I made it an indefinite semi-protection. If at some time anyone thinks this is too long, the section right below these requests provides an option for anyone to ask for that protection to be changed. — Maile (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, DuncanHill (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Maile66.. (For the archiving bot's purposes.) Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting an increase in protection from pending changes because of IP address sockpuppetry. The person under IP addresses 2600:387:8:9::b4, 2600:387:8:f::72, and 2602:306:3247:3680:6d52:a322:350f:308a has made the same edits and recently was blocked for edit warring on the 2600:387:8:f::72 IP address. At this point protection preventing all IP address is going to be the best thing to stop this. Rockchalk717 22:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. and Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – I think template editors should be able to edit this. The page was protected in 2005, which I think was before the template editor class was created. Mr. Guye (talk) 19:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Downgraded to template protection; protecting admin rather inactive. Lectonar (talk) 22:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: There have been recent unsourced additions lately, which have been reverted. George Ho (talk) 14:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several instances of vandalism over the past week. Lepricavark (talk) 15:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: It is a biography of a living person and should therefore be protected. Many false changes occured in the past few weeks.92.209.62.219 (talk) 16:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BLPs are not automatically protected. Lectonar (talk) 16:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Especially in the last 24 hours. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – very few productive anon edits. WNYY98 (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated by three different accounts for an organisation with no evidence of notability. Blythwood (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 20:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term disruption as shown by protection log. WNYY98 (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Despite the pending changes protection, still disruptive editing from IPs. . Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. BilCat (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21 April 2017

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current protection level: Pending Changes: autoconfirmed (indefinite) appears not to be working. Persistent vandalism over the past 48 hours by SPA / sock / VOA accounts. Toddst1 (talk) 18:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Short-term full protection: Steeletrap and I just started a full-blown dispute where both of us believe in good faith that the other's edits are BLP violations. I would like to see this page reverted to the most recent stable version (pre-April 21) and full-protected while we try to work out a consensus on the talk page. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism courtesy the fine children of Allendale. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

auto-confirmed permission: Resumption of longterm campaign by various single-edit IPs to introduce "funny" nicknames into the lead, previously addressed with pp. [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] Request auto-confirmed permission. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very long-term and very low-level. Lectonar (talk) 15:34, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv4 and v6 edit warring addition of out of scope content to this article. Somewhat long-term as seen in edit history additions of large amounts of content at once. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from school-ish IPs over the past 48 hours. Toddst1 (talk) 17:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kellymoat (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The user in question has a habit of editing project pages, often in a disruptive manner — including this very page. A permanent semi would prevent him from vandalizing his own SPI pages. Raymie (tc) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DoneJuliancolton | Talk 17:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 17:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection, maybe two weeks given the editing pattern. An IP-hopping vandal has spent weeks periodically visiting this page to attack one of the school's residences. The behavioral tipoff is that if you say they're violating a specific policy, they will ignore your concern, revert you, and falsely claim that you are violating that policy. A range block of 129.21 could also work, especially since that geolocation proves this person is attacking via RIT's computers, but that might be a bit too much. CityOfSilver 15:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NPalgan2 (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bunny2090 (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 year. EdJohnston (talk) 16:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Please check the talk page. Kostas20142 (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:48, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over the definition of the article. Needs discussion and past experience of the article suggests that won't happen without a brief period of protection. Sitush (talk) 14:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of problems the last couple of days with the highly original vandalism of the "owner" parameter in the infobox. EricEnfermero (Talk) 14:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hopping anon(s) repeatedly removing sourced material and adding unsourced. Sitush (talk) 09:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced genres from IPs originating from Brazil. . —Farix (t | c) 10:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Page was just released from full-protection, and the content dispute immediately resumed. Page fails per WP:NTOUR, and should be protected for a longer period of time. livelikemusic talk! 12:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive editing by way of adding unsourced or poorly sourced content in a manner of violating the biographies of living persons policy. livelikemusic talk! 12:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Could you protect this page to help slow down/stop this EW, at least for the time? Thanks. -barrelroll.dev (talk) 03:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:00, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – a consistent target of Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Hanoi_Vandal. Kellymoat (talk) 04:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not seeing a justification for anything more than this. Vanamonde (talk) 11:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. On second thoughts. EC still not justified: the socks are all IPs. Vanamonde (talk) 11:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – a consistent target of Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Hanoi_Vandal. Kellymoat (talk) 04:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – a consistent target of Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Hanoi_Vandal. Kellymoat (talk) 04:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:09, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – a consistent target of Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Hanoi_Vandal. Kellymoat (talk) 04:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 11:09, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, regular addition of unsourced material, and structure not fitting Wikipedia's guidelines. Patelhime (talk) 03:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, regular addition of unsourced material, and structure not fitting Wikipedia's guidelines. Patelhime (talk) 03:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect until morning (MDT). Persistent IP hopping 4-20 vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 04:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP vios that have gone on consistently since at least early April and as recently as yesterday. These uncited edits, giving purported real names of drag queens, many of them amateur and not professional performers, are essentially attempts at outing people who may not want to be outed. The same anon IPs are doing it also at RuPaul's Drag Race (season 2), RuPaul's Drag Race (season 3), RuPaul's Drag Race (season 4), RuPaul's Drag Race (season 5), RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6), and RuPaul's Drag Race (season 7). --Tenebrae (talk) 16:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: @Tenebrae: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All articles. NeilN talk to me 17:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. 1989 18:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent spike in vandalism/editing tests by IPs. Possibly because next book in topic series has a set release date of two weeks from now. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 02:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A series of mostly single-purpose IPs keep adding links to literary forgery and false document to the "see also" section. The most recent of those IPs claimed on the talk page that "The Germania book is considered to be fabricated by some historians." I challenged him/her to provide reliable sources to that effect rather than engage in this sort of innuendo, but he/she just keeps putting the links back in. Nicknack009 (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is just one IP. Lectonar (talk) 19:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Page seems to start becoming the target of vandalism previously directed to Friday the 13th: The Game, which is now protected. Lordtobi () 20:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Lordtobi:: there are other protection levels than full protection; if you have not done so already, be so kind as to read our protection policy. Lectonar (talk) 20:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 01:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:24, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc (open channel) 01:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Repeated promotional edits which involve removing all references from the article. Started by a new SPA but continued by pre-existing account, which means semi-protection isn't enough. Cheers, Number 57 19:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also just discovered that the SPA initiating the edits is Cohen's spokesman (see here). Number 57 19:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @Number 57: Warned the other two editors. NeilN talk to me 19:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated vandalism, history-rewriting, IP edits disruption, and controversial / unverifiable score-changing. Look at its history and show me where any constructive edits have occurred since a sports fan website claims they know the actual final score (hint: none). Also see this article's talk page. It's getting increasingly frustrating to revert non-stop IP vandalism. I'd like this article to be indefinitely protected from unregistered users. Jrcla2 (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: warriors in playoffs, unregistered users trying to be clever. Skrewler (talk) 23:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous year-long protection just expired. Very poor timing. MelanieN (talk) 23:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Moderately visible template that if attacked, would cause damage to high-profile articles like Nightmare, Genius, and Taco. Mr. Guye (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. We can't pending changes protect templates. Lectonar (talk) 19:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit warring - with three different IP addresses - asserting the same thing without explanation or sources to back their claim(s). This group of IPs (which geolocate to near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and probably the same person) has also been disruptive at Template:Disney XD Original Series (which is now semiprotected) by removing the series this article talks about from that template's content. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

23 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nationalist edits that are unsourced and certainly not neutral. multiple times in 24 hours. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 16:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – user:Dylan Florida. Kellymoat (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No need for extended confirmed protection; semi should do the trick. MelanieN (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Edit-warring has restarted over content that resulted in partial protection last month. No attempts to discuss on talk page. --Ronz (talk) 14:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – and if someone could deal with the nasty personal attacks by the sock IP, that'd be helpful too.[44]. LouisAragon (talk) 16:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly vandalized by IP and newly registered users. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 16:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Particular unsourced/poorly sourced content added by one IP, and then restored by another IP (with more additions), then restored again by yet another IP, happening within the past few hours. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent sourced content removal, addition of unsourced stuff, and vandalism from IP users. Nickag989talk 17:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruption by IPs once the protection template has been removed. Suggest "pending edits review" or permanent protection. . K.e.coffman (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 18:22, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 18:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 6 months NeilN talk to me 18:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Carl Fredrik talk 18:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 or 4 days of IP persistent disruption. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Orchomen at it again. Long-term abuse. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen and User:Amaury/List of accounts and IPs used by Orchomen. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – therefore this film has been release. update box office collection so i want to protection.  Adnan Enaya Afzal  talk 12:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 15:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Child actor, seems to very attractive for vandalism/attacks. Denniss (talk) 20:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Recent death, IP's plugging cause of death, which is not yet determined. . - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Some IP editors keep saying that he is no longer signed with WWE, even though he still is. Nickag989talk 20:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the fact that needed edits to this page are few and far between and the high level of IP vandalism, indefinite semi makes very good sense for this page. John from Idegon (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + : Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nver protected before. Lectonar (talk) 21:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mélencron (talk) 11:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Can you provide examples? It's being edited by a lot of IPs... El_C 11:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here: [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – highly visible, long protection log. WNYY98 (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 15:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit rate too high for PC. WNYY98 (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 15:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from multiple IP addresses after prior protection. Arxiloxos (talk) 19:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Agt2008fan is back with new socks, and knowing them they will keep being annoying until the page is protected again. bonadea contributions talk 08:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 08:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 11:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 11:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Obi2canibe (talk) 11:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editors adding BLP violations due to tabloid speculation. Widefox; talk 13:14, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
13:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Jo-Jo Eumerus. Katietalk 15:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant long-term anon vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant berating the mixed critic response as "paid and fake" and adding audience reactions. Likely related to the Armenian movement to praise the film, like with the IMDb voting controversy. TropicAces (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This film is going to get all kinds of people fired up. I concur with the 1 week PP and would not be surprised if this becomes a long term target for disruptive editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Iloveartrock. Binksternet (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Widr. Katietalk 15:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Please remove the protection on this redirect. It has served its purpose and no longer is warranted. Thank you.--John Cline (talk) 07:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:Agt2008fan is back with new socks, and knowing them they will keep being annoying until the page is protected again. bonadea contributions talk 08:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 08:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 11:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 11:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Obi2canibe (talk) 11:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editors adding BLP violations due to tabloid speculation. Widefox; talk 13:14, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
13:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Jo-Jo Eumerus. Katietalk 15:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant long-term anon vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant berating the mixed critic response as "paid and fake" and adding audience reactions. Likely related to the Armenian movement to praise the film, like with the IMDb voting controversy. TropicAces (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 15:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This film is going to get all kinds of people fired up. I concur with the 1 week PP and would not be surprised if this becomes a long term target for disruptive editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Iloveartrock. Binksternet (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Widr. Katietalk 15:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Please remove the protection on this redirect. It has served its purpose and no longer is warranted. Thank you.--John Cline (talk) 07:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism again and again. TrendSPLEND 18:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: There's a lot of editing by different IP addresss, but after reviewing each diff made by each one, I don't see where the blatant vandalism is; this all seems content related. I also see no undo's or reversions. Can you explain exactly where the issue is? Am I missing something? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:24, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Alerting requester TrendSPLEND, who was asked a question.--Mr. Guye (talk) 22:13, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: The main problem with the article is that it is frequently edited by numerous IPs. As the article is about a popular serial, it has been vandalised many times in the past (copy-pasting from websites, promotional content etc.) and will be the same case in the future. The content has just been reverted, but the chances are strong, it will be disrupted in future also. So, the protection will at least reduce the chances of vandalising and reduce our efforts also to revert it again and again. TrendSPLEND 10:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 03:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of past editing patterns that required previous protections; addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 23:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 03:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Widgetsz89 (talk) 23:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 03:03, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons repeatedly removing sourced material - part of an ongoing issue that caused the related Chekavar article to be put under PC recently. Sitush (talk) 06:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of persistent vandalism by the same user (know that is the same for the WHOIP location, although it changes the IP twice or more in a day). I request a permanent or at least a monthly semi-protection of this page because every day various users we have to revert the changes on this page. This page was semi-protected about 3 weeks ago and he waited for the protection to end to keep doing again those vandalism changes, I warned about this page here and the page got protected for 2 more weeks. Again, the same user, came exactly the day when the semi-protection ended to do exactly the same. I request a bigger semi-protection of the page. --TechnicianGB (talk) 00:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – frequent vandalism by an ip. TerribleToes sõnum mulle! 04:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – High level of BLP vandalism from IPs. bonadea contributions talk 06:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:11, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since 4/18/2017, series of questionable edits by IPs in a similar range. Just got it back to the versrion before the IP edits began.-. Geoff | Who, me? 21:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. One of the top prospects for the 2017 NFL Draft, which starts on April 27. Overexcited fans can't wait to add him to their team. Please semi-protect until May 1. --bender235 (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A series of mostly single-purpose IPs keep adding links to literary forgery and false document to the "see also" section. The most recent of those IPs claimed on the talk page that "The Germania book is considered to be fabricated by some historians." I challenged him/her to provide reliable sources to that effect rather than engage in this sort of innuendo, but he/she just keeps putting the links back in. Nicknack009 (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is just one IP. Lectonar (talk) 19:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not so - you can't have looked very hard. Special:Contributions/192.161.200.5. Special:Contributions/50.45.4.118. Special:Contributions/50.40.211.1. Special:Contributions/50.40.198.146. Special:Contributions/50.40.213.3. This is a campaign. Are you going to help, or not? --Nicknack009 (talk) 20:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have looked...some of the disruptive edits are from October 2016(!) or earlier. IP 192.xxx is the actual problem (and has still not been warned). If another admin wants to protect, go ahead. Lectonar (talk) 22:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism re Roblox, the previous RPP seemed to be effective, but too short - only one hour. I hereby propose a two-week moratorium on IP edits on this article, owing to the recent disruptive editing of late. ↅ𝜞 (Contact me) (See my edits) 00:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 02:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I don't think PC is enough - there has been a spike of recent vandalism. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 18:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RHaworth. Lectonar (talk) 22:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi create-protection: SALT (a fortnight should do) after deletion please. Repeatedly created the third time after deletion. Lourdes 03:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 03:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 04:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nationalist edits that are unsourced and certainly not neutral. multiple times in 24 hours. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 16:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – user:Dylan Florida. Kellymoat (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No need for extended confirmed protection; semi should do the trick. MelanieN (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Edit-warring has restarted over content that resulted in partial protection last month. No attempts to discuss on talk page. --Ronz (talk) 14:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – and if someone could deal with the nasty personal attacks by the sock IP, that'd be helpful too.[54]. LouisAragon (talk) 16:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly vandalized by IP and newly registered users. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 16:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Particular unsourced/poorly sourced content added by one IP, and then restored by another IP (with more additions), then restored again by yet another IP, happening within the past few hours. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent sourced content removal, addition of unsourced stuff, and vandalism from IP users. Nickag989talk 17:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruption by IPs once the protection template has been removed. Suggest "pending edits review" or permanent protection. . K.e.coffman (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 18:22, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi () 18:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 6 months NeilN talk to me 18:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Carl Fredrik talk 18:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 or 4 days of IP persistent disruption. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Orchomen at it again. Long-term abuse. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen and User:Amaury/List of accounts and IPs used by Orchomen. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

24 April 2017

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Saw the movie, vandal target, see history. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 13:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit was made to the article on April 22, and article was vandalized by one account (now blocked) on April 20. Protection not needed at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs from blocked user (suspectedly User:Lowlihao). Night Lantern (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. for harassment. Message me on my talk page if more show up. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism going on by adding external movie streaming links. . Bishal Shrestha (talk) 17:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Widr. Lectonar (talk) 17:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kudos @Lectonar:. I got him protect the article because it went a bit slow here. Thanks again Bishal Shrestha (talk) 18:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 13:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Re-created just once. Lectonar (talk) 13:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Six months' semi-protection. This is an upcoming big-budget Indian action film. It's been an ongoing source of frustration at pending changes thanks to a constant stream of anonymous edits that are mostly neither obvious vandalism nor helpful at all. (They're almost always efforts to move preferred performers ahead of others in cast lists, add poorly-written prose about the plot, include unsourced claims about the budget, and similar unhelpful stuff.) Yesterday, I had to let an unhelpful edit stand because it would have been a fourth revert in 24 hours; just now, I had to restore several bad edits because my revert seems to have been a violation. The film's director is aiming for a release date of October 18, and I believe the only way to achieve a stable version is by semi-protecting until then. CityOfSilver 14:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For that matter, I'd appreciate it if the admin responding to this report could revert my most recent edit there. CityOfSilver 14:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see where we are in three months. Vanamonde (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent spamming of a copyvio site. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jauerback. Vanamonde (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 50 edits/day most IP and most un constructive, section blanking etc. L3X1 (distant write) 14:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Was SEMI for 4 days earlier this month L3X1 (distant write) 14:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism, of the middle school variety. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The passenger destination table of this article is disruptively manipulated by many IP users with addition of non-existent/ terminated destinations. This page needs long term semi-protection. Vibhss (talk) 15:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi'd for three months, which will hopefully be long enough for the IPs to get bored and find a new hobby. If it continues once the protection expires, re-request it—I'm reluctant to indefinitely protect an article on an international airport, as this is the kind of topic which a lot of legitimate new editors start off by editing. ‑ Iridescent 16:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: – Created one month ago; currently transcluded in 370+ file pages. There will be more files PROD-ded since the change in WP:PROD. George Ho (talk) 06:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A stream of bad edits since the last protection expired. John of Reading (talk) 12:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Personal request. To prevent from personal attack/vandalism by IP users. Night Lantern (talk) 14:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I also added full move protection on your user page indefinitely. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content.  Adnan Enaya Afzal  talk 10:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. Jupitus Smart 11:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Not quite widely protected enough to merit cascade protection or full protection; semi should suffice here. Pinging Fuhghettaboutit. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:19, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I am not the protecting admin (who is inactive). Rather, I was lowering the protection level from full to template editor, but then realized my change did nothing but make it seem like it was lowered when it wasn't b/c I didn't realize it had cascading protection. With only 31 transclusion, I see no reason not to lower to semi-protected.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's still cascade-protected, Ymblanter. George Ho (talk) 07:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Its is the actor's birthday today and with Google India honoring him with a Doodle, editors have been frequenting the page, vandalizing it with non-referenced and WP:Good faith editing. Editor5454 (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past few weeks. Also wondering if when this expires permanent semi-protection is warranted. HapHaxion (talk - contribs) 05:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. BilCat (talk) 06:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Its is the actor's birthday today and with Google India honoring him with a Doodle, editors have been frequenting the page, vandalizing it with non-referenced and WP:Good faith editing. Editor5454 (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past few weeks. Also wondering if when this expires permanent semi-protection is warranted. HapHaxion (talk - contribs) 05:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. BilCat (talk) 06:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 20:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Pending changes: WP:SPAs have been targeting the page for years.VictoriaGraysonTalk 21:08, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Actually, this is semi-protected infinitely; VictoriaGrayson do you want it downgraded to pending changes? Lectonar (talk) 21:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending changes protection where reviewers have to approve changes is a downgrade?VictoriaGraysonTalk 21:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Answered on your talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of vandalism and disruptive editing by IP accounts and mobile accounts. VietPride10 (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, especially from anons. Page was previously protected for 1 week or so and then the vandals returned.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 22:57, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kellymoat (talk) 00:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.. El_C 03:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. GABgab 01:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 02:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Due to the page name, new and IP editors frequently use this page in an attempt to create a new article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 02:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 03:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Due to persistent IP vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 02:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – removal of copyvio blanking – page was re-created as copyvio after deletion for the same reason. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 19:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Admins check these revisions if possible: [55], [56], [57], [58] and [59]. These revisions are clearly proving that IP addresses adding their own personal opinion for this subject. Request (humble request) to protect this page from unwanted and unsourced data additions. SuperHero👊 16:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC). SuperHero👊 16:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 19:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nipponese Dog Calvero.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 19:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – too many anons continually attacking the page. It may be time to do this to all Major League Soccer articles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Hut8.5. Lectonar (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

25 April 2017

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editors/IPs/Socks are all constantly adding copyvio images of this BLP and it doesn't look like it's gonna stop anytime soon so I'm requesting indef protection, Salting image titles won't work as they just reupload under a new title, The article was protected last year for the exact same reason, Thanks, . –Davey2010Talk 00:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Semi will do nothing as all the editors are autoconfirmed. It would require that the article be fully protected or editors be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather - Sorry this should've been an Extended confirmed request but wont Extended work either then ?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:41, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It will stop two of the four. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content.  Adnan Enaya Afzal  talk 10:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Few unconfirmed users keep changing the content with no reference and it is being done with different IP address. Amdmustafa (talk) 13:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Appears to have a high level of recent IP vandalism. Boopitydoopityboop (talk) 12:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, needs protecting until the election on June 8th 2017. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 13:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It has not been protected before, let's not be hasty. Vanamonde (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP editors.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Appears to have a high level of recent IP vandalism. Boopitydoopityboop (talk) 12:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, needs protecting until the election on June 8th 2017. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 13:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It has not been protected before, let's not be hasty. Vanamonde (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP editors.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-stop unsourced additions and inserting personal opinions by IPs. None of them provide any source or discuss his/her concerns on talk page. Wario-Man (talk) 10:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. -- AlexTW 11:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Subject has just released a blog post complaining about the article and made a public accusation against one of the editors, see talk page for details. Many thanks Mramoeba (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Looks like the problem could continue for awhile or longer. Philip Cross (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + : Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/75.111.254.167 who followed [these edits by registering the account User:KanyeHimselfSaidItWasAGospelAlbum. Binksternet (talk) 23:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
08:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Vanamonde93. Lectonar (talk) 10:46, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
08:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Vanamonde (talk) 10:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

26 April 2017

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Request speedy close User can just have talk page access blocked. —JJBers 15:04, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Talk page access blocked. MelanieN (talk) 15:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Immediate resumption last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 19:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 15:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is on a subject in the news, getting a flurry of IP vandalism lulz. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A report at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents was posted, regarding the article that is now semi-protected. It may not always be necessary, and it may not attract as much attention for admins to respond in time. Slasher405 (talk) 19:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive editing from unconfirmed users resumed shortly after temporary semi-protection expired. Funcrunch (talk) 18:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:35, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, defamatory content, apparent block evasion. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked the accounts for sock puppetry. There's no question that they're all the same person. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be keeping active eyes on this article... if more socks pop up, I'll proceed with protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Oshwah. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Kostas20142 (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 17:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. JimRenge (talk) 17:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Illinois Huskies

Temporary move protection or semi-protection: A user has consistently attempted to revert the name of the athletics program to NIU, apparently not understanding our page naming policies for official vs. common names.  ONR  (talk)  05:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's one user. Protecting pages against one user is the wrong way around. Request action against the user if necessary. GedUK  12:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – spam edits on wikipedia page. (River Leck). C4100 (talk) 10:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Maile (talk) 12:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is currently under attack by a well-known vandal. As confessed in one of his edit summaries, this person is engaged in hounding, i.e. chasing me around Wikipedia and damaging it with the purpose of harassment. Still, if more evidence is required, I keep a full database of all his IP addresses and blocked account to date, which I can provide on request. Codename Lisa (talk) 11:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent anon IP/throwaway accounts changing description of "white supremacist" to something more friendly-sounding, without discussion and without complying with MOS (home article describes person as "white supremacist" in the lede.). NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 15:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mind that this is the disambiguition page, not the real article. Lectonar (talk) 17:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 14:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism. Adding a link to a Tumblr page which says that Hendricks is part of a political matriarchy movement. †dismas†|(talk) 15:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred.. MelanieN (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As you can see this page's history it has been target of lots of ip's to do lots of disruptive editing. This article should be protected for 6 months for controlling the disruptive editing by the ip's. Regards, TKSS (talk) 15:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC). TKSS (talk) 15:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is receiving a high level of vandalism and BLP violations. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent BLP vio's by IP and socks of said IP. - Mlpearc (open channel) 01:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent high level of vandalism by IPs. Putting all unsourced materials without having any knowledge of the subject.--Anandmoorti (talk) 08:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has clearly been going on for a while. Vanamonde (talk) 13:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Saqib (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 15:11, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persitent BLP violations by user Drchriswilliams, a political activist, who has taken exception to a verified edit that Paul Monaghan, a UK politician, prefers the non-medical nomenclature of "doctor". This has edit - verified both in the article and on the talk page - has now been removed by him three times. Hubertgrove (talk) 14:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite happy to see an increased level of protection applied to this page, although would highlight my edits today were in response to Hubertgrove adding material that was not WP:BLP-compliant. Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have provided photographic WP:BLP-compliant evidence of the edit, which is in addition politically neutral, but Drchriswilliams does not feel able to accept this and continually reverts the page. Hubertgrove (talk) 14:13, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is a content dispute, to be worked out on the talk page. Hubertgrove, please do not characterize a simple content dispute as "vandalism" and "BLP violation". MelanieN (talk) 15:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This has been under pending changes since July 2013, when Lectonar protected it on the strange grounds of "BLP violations". The article is the site of permanent academic controversies with ethno-nationalist undertones, but PC isn't suited to such involved disputes. If edit warring breaks out again or a string of poor edits from IPs/new accounts then semi can be reimposed. : Noyster (talk), 14:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Yes...I probably meant to use "verifiability|addition of sourced or poorly sourced content". I disagree with your reasoning for complete unprotection, though; here pending changes protection does exactly what it is supposed to do: prevent content which is unsourced, and which might be an attack or a denigration from going live; also you have some more eyes on the changes to boot. And: semi-protection is always a reaction to vandalism, whereas pending changes is proactive and sort of prevents vandalism. As usual, if another admin wants to unprotect, just go ahead. Lectonar (talk) 15:52, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My point is though that this article is not prone to vandalism, but to content disputes that only someone with considerable knowledge of ancient Mesopotamian languages and ethnicities could adjudicate. As PC reviewer I accepted a string of edits from an IP that were in no sense vandalism or personal attacks and did include sources. These soon got reverted and the article is now semi'd anyway. But this has been one of the grounds for rejecting PC2 - that generalist PC reviewers may not be in a position to tell good from bad edits in these higher-level disagreements: Noyster (talk), 11:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was vandalised enough, and pending changes was implemented to avoid these vandsalism. Anyway, this is a procedural Not done, as the semi-protection superimposes pending-changes protection. Regards Lectonar (talk) 17:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 17:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spike of recent vandalism. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 04:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden burst of Google Doodle related vandalism. Safiel (talk) 04:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or alternatively, PC protection. There isn't anything constructive coming from IPs in the last couple of months, and plenty of disruption. . Vanamonde (talk) 05:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.GedUK  12:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-intensity vandalism this morning. : Noyster (talk), 08:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected.GedUK  12:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: On User talk:86.163.59.61: Continues to remove template, see this history. - Rama Ybrahim (Talk) 12:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:35, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent spamming by multiple IPs and a now blocked user (unsure about block evasionm although another IP from the same range was blocked for just that). The Banner talk 16:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's never been protected before, let's not be hasty. Vanamonde (talk) 05:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent relationship drama has lots of IPs vandalizing his relationship status and occupations. —Torchiest talkedits 16:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dr. K. 19:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 23:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from anonymous IP user/s (with multiple IP addresses) adding fake chart positions and certifications to this page.Nqr9 (talk) 01:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 01:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow, persistent disruptive editing by ip . Onel5969 TT me 03:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Competition in two, maybe three editors. 45 edits today. Two editors avoided 3RR by manually changing the content. Kindly protect the article for 72 or 96 hours (3 or 4 days). Thanks. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a high traffic article. Collateral damage would be extreme. If there is serious edit warring going on there are other ways to deal with that. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: erm... okay
This hasn't happened with this article in a while though. It seems it has cooled down, I hope they don't give it a go again after few hours. Thanks again. :) —usernamekiran (talk) 21:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If the problem returns point them to my note on the talk page. If that fails post edit warring warnings on their talk page, and if that fails take the matter to WP:ANEW. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
okay. :) they are at it again. I will post link to this talkpage on the talkpage of the involved editors. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP edits against multiple sources. Grayfell (talk) 02:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:11, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sargon of Akkad, a youtuber with large audience, has just made an video alleging that BAMN is a cult [60]. There are already many IP editors flooding the page due to recent attention on BAMN and knowing his audience I expect his video will be bringing many more. Nanite (talk) 00:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:39, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WCS100 (talk) 01:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – A variety of IPs and non-autoconfirmed users are adding the same non-notable silliness repeatedly for 2017, apparently in response to something related to some YouTuber. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit war currently going on with users adding non-BLP content relating to a recent scandal; until a reliable and secondary source reports, requesting one week of semi-protection. 2607:FEA8:5A40:758:D10C:4B27:2263:370 (talk) 23:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wackyike (talk) 00:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs, fans keep adding false music certifications. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There seems to be an IP hopping person or group of people repeatedly adding the same bad edit misdefining what an actor is. This has been going on for a few days. Stopping IP edits for a few days may well put an end to it. DanielRigal (talk) 20:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconfirmed reports of an ownership change[61]. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We have a long term pattern of IP editors coming here to make more or less the same edit in which they change an accurate statement that the BHIs "believe that they are descendants of the ancient Israelites." into an absolute statement that they are descendants. Obviously this can not be proven either way as it is a religious belief, not a fact that can be verified, so we should not make that statement. They know this but still they persist. Recent edits have tried to disguise what they were doing with misleading edit summaries. This has been going on for long enough that I think that indefinite (or at least a very long period) of semi-protection is needed. DanielRigal (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 22:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given the judge's latest ruling and high profile of the case and constant unnecessary vandalism. Snickers2686 (talk) 22:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.. El_C 23:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Recreation of deleted content...the previous indefinite protection fell off for some reason, despite their being no record of its removal. . RGloucester 14:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. It's semi right now and that seems to be working. Registered editors can be warned, etc. By the way here is where the protection was reduced. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging Black Kite per the protection level reduction discussion. Sam Walton (talk) 14:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Highly visible page, target for test edits/new article creation. At a minimum this needs to have its move protection raised (see history). – Train2104 (t • c) 14:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I changed it to template editor protected. The only level above that is Administrator. The recent move you reverted exposes a flaw in our confirmed/auto confirmed definition. That move was done by someone who only had 20 edits to their credit, but had been on Wikipedia for 11 months. — Maile (talk) 15:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Random IP user who keeps vandalising the page, by changing informations. Nickag989talk 15:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ToThAc (talk) 15:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: one of the top prospects of the 2017 NFL Draft starting this Thursday. Overly excited fans are already adding their favorite team on his article again and again, and this form of vandalism will only increase until Thursday. Please semi-protect the article until after the draft, that is Sunday (April 30). --bender235 (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. For now I see not much activity. Please relist when it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Was previously protected for three days; problematic sock returned two days after it expired and will not stop perverting the certifications. It is very similar to the case at Infinity on High. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 15:51, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. . – 🐱? (talk) (ping me!) 17:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:50, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection due to short-term but potentially libelous BLP vandalism coming from 2601:805:4201:1737::/64. (Asking for protection seems more straightforward than asking for a range block in this case.) Rebbing 17:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Funny enough, this article was never protected before, which baffles me. Lectonar (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping BLP vandals. Home Lander (talk) 18:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 18:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oswah. Lectonar (talk) 21:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See protection log for the background. Brojam (talk) 19:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 21:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 20:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – With slightly less than 2000 transclusions, this template does not merit full or cascade protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Per discussion at the RFPP talk page. No explanation provided for why this template's protection needs to be lowered. ~ Rob13Talk 12:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – With slightly less than 200 transclusions, this template does not merit full or cascade protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Per discussion at the RFPP talk page. No explanation provided for why this template's protection needs to be lowered. ~ Rob13Talk 12:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – With slightly more than 40000 transclusions, this template does not merit full or cascade protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Per discussion at the RFPP talk page. No explanation provided for why this template's protection needs to be lowered. ~ Rob13Talk 12:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – With slightly less than 50 transclusions, this template only merits template protection. Or semi protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Per discussion at the RFPP talk page. No explanation provided for why this template's protection needs to be lowered. ~ Rob13Talk 12:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – This template is not so widely used as to merit full protection. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Per discussion at the RFPP talk page. No explanation provided for why this template's protection needs to be lowered. ~ Rob13Talk 12:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – With less than 4000 transclusions, this template is prolly a candidate for template protection rather than full. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Per discussion at the RFPP talk page. No explanation provided for why this template's protection needs to be lowered. ~ Rob13Talk 12:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

27 April 2017

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Some variation of this revert cycle is being repeated a couple times per day for a number of days now, by a number of editors on an article under 1RR. VQuakr (talk) 15:24, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Recuse. El_C 15:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Handling through discretionary sanctions. NeilN talk to me 15:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Big ongoing event for the next three days. IP vandalism is getting worse. Please semi-protect until Sunday. --bender235 (talk) 18:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being targeted by long-term vandal and sockpuppets. Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 18:50, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked all involved IPs for block evasion. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:50, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 16:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The page has been protected two times in the last couple of week due to persistent vandalism from unregistered users. The problem has returned immediately upon the expiration of each of those two protections. Deli nk (talk) 18:04, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator NeilN. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 17:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Archive bot. Grumble. NeilN talk to me 18:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of BLP violating unsourced non-notable alumnus entry. Talk page discussion and some edit summaries show that this is the same editor (and a claimed COI) but IP hopping mobile edits make blocks useless, and the range precludes range blocks. Edits resumed after a short protection by User:Oshwah . Meters (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:24, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, too many requests! El_C 15:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by an IP Hopper. Tompop888 (talk) (contribs) 15:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page was semi-protected. at that time the article was not sources. I hoped some IPs will make good edits. I requested that the protection should be lowered to pending-changes. Now I have sourced the article. And now I think semi-protection is necessary as most IP edits are disruptive. The actor deceased today and is a legendary Bollywood actor. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Marvellous Spider-Man, can you please explain why you undid this without comment? NeilN talk to me 17:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It looked undue and looks promoting american bazaar website. --Marvellous Spider-Man 17:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Marvellous Spider-Man: It may be undue (you should have put that in your edit summary) but promotion of the source is a real stretch. --NeilN talk to me 18:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. NeilN talk to me 18:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, too many requests! El_C 15:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by an IP Hopper. Tompop888 (talk) (contribs) 15:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page was semi-protected. at that time the article was not sources. I hoped some IPs will make good edits. I requested that the protection should be lowered to pending-changes. Now I have sourced the article. And now I think semi-protection is necessary as most IP edits are disruptive. The actor deceased today and is a legendary Bollywood actor. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Marvellous Spider-Man, can you please explain why you undid this without comment? NeilN talk to me 17:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It looked undue and looks promoting american bazaar website. --Marvellous Spider-Man 17:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Marvellous Spider-Man: It may be undue (you should have put that in your edit summary) but promotion of the source is a real stretch. --NeilN talk to me 18:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. NeilN talk to me 18:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP hopper; see my talk page history. -- AlexTW 12:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:48, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism despite pending changes protection. Boopitydoopityboop (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:48, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of disruptive edits in past 5 days. L3X1 (distant write) 13:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Page was protected, but since protection was removed there has been more vandalism, and will certainly continue. Doctorkaufman (talk) 13:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. One of the top prospects in the 2017 NFL Draft that starts today and continues through Saturday. The article was protected until yesterday because IPs would add their favorite teams to the infobox prematurely. The protection ended and the vandalism picked up again. Please semi-protect for another three days. --bender235 (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Same reason as with Watson above. Please semi-protect until Sunday. --bender235 (talk) 13:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued attempts to recreate uncited stub where material has been merged into target article. Onel5969 TT me 13:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued attempts to recreate stub (with no reliable sourcing) where material has been merged into target article. Onel5969 TT me 14:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued attempts to recreate stub (with no reliable sources) where material has been merged into target article. Onel5969 TT me 14:02, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A series of new accounts have been adding the same unsourced promotional text since January. Whether sock or meatpuppets, it is clear that the attempt to promote commercial interests is not ceasing. Related page K. Wah International has had same issue. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content into the article; content also violates the biographies of living persons policy. livelikemusic talk! 14:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 14:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 14:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The closer we get to a pro wrestling event, the more disruptive edits from IP users are apparent (3 days until Payback). Nickag989talk 14:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. One of the top prospects in the 2017 NFL Draft that starts today and continues through Saturday. The article was protected until yesterday because IPs would add their favorite teams to the infobox prematurely. The protection ended and the vandalism picked up again. Please semi-protect for another three days. --bender235 (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Same reason as with Watson above. Please semi-protect until Sunday. --bender235 (talk) 13:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued attempts to recreate uncited stub where material has been merged into target article. Onel5969 TT me 13:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued attempts to recreate stub (with no reliable sourcing) where material has been merged into target article. Onel5969 TT me 14:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued attempts to recreate stub (with no reliable sources) where material has been merged into target article. Onel5969 TT me 14:02, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A series of new accounts have been adding the same unsourced promotional text since January. Whether sock or meatpuppets, it is clear that the attempt to promote commercial interests is not ceasing. Related page K. Wah International has had same issue. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content into the article; content also violates the biographies of living persons policy. livelikemusic talk! 14:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. WNYY98 (talk) 14:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 14:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The closer we get to a pro wrestling event, the more disruptive edits from IP users are apparent (3 days until Payback). Nickag989talk 14:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: On User talk:85.92.170.99: The following have been blanked the page, see this history. Rama Ybrahim (Talk) 09:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Actually, they are allowed to do that, see WP:BLANKING. Also, admins could revoke talk-page access for the IP, which is much less restrictive. Lectonar (talk) 09:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent vandalism, see this history. - Rama Ybrahim (Talk) 09:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Please also read our protection policy, if you have not done so already. Lectonar (talk) 09:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor repeatedly adding frankly ludicrous masses of wikilinks without sources. Repeatedly includes many weapons that not only weren't used, but couldn't have been, such as pre-WWII or post-1980 US weapons. . Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of links from several IPs, resuming quickly after previous protection expired. Simplexity22 (talk) 06:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. As the report above, I'll be monitoring this page as well. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High volume of unsourced changes, likely vandalism, from anon-IPs and new users. -- Rrburke (talk) 11:00, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist 11:47, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:48, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism. DuncanHill (talk) 23:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @DuncanHill: If more IPs show up, please ping me NeilN talk to me 04:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of content based on unreliable sources against consensus by IP hopper. BilCat (talk) 06:42, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I'm going to keep an eye on the article to see if any more subnets from the /16 range pop up. If it keeps happening, I'll protect the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Recent death, persistent vandalism, multiple IPs Jim1138 (talk) 07:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: or any other administrator reduce to pending changes to allow constructive IPs and newbies. --Marvellous Spider-Man 08:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done, pls let me know if the semi needs to be reinstalled, the article is being heavily edited.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant IP adding of unsourced material. RF23 (talk) 03:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Term seems to mean "dumb" in India which leads to anons adding all sorts of names here. NeilN talk to me 04:02, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 05:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Closedmouth. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs. Coderzombie (talk) 06:00, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - An anonymous IP and its sock puppets have persisted in vandalising all the BloodRayne video game pages with the line "Bloodrayne is a shameless and obvious rip-off of the 2000AD comic Durham Red" for the past several years. Within a day of removing semi-protection on this page, the vandalism started again.. 172.73.165.243 (talk) 22:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - IP's vandalizing the page with unsourced content and putting random dates of when they think album will be released. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 22:35, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Additions of unsourced personal info by socks. Lizard (talk) 22:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – rather persistent trolling . EvergreenFir (talk) 22:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated cases of vandalism from multiple users, most of which have an edit summary of something like "removed unneeded info" or "cut out the junk", and then blank out the whole section for "Sexuality" in the section labelled "In culture and society". McSqueegee (talk) 23:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC indef NeilN talk to me 04:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Permanent semi protection for forever, please. Every single time semi goes off, this edit occurs -- the IP sometimes changes, so blocks have been ineffective. Not sure why this IP has such an issue, but it's a constant. Montanabw(talk) 01:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Film studio pages

Temporary semi-protection: An IP-hopping editor has been repeatedly adding the same content on these pages. Some of the content is arguably legitimate, which argues for treating this as a content dispute; however, when challenged or reverted, the editor has issued threats ("REVERT ONE MORE DAMN TIME AND I SWEAR TO GOD I'LL RIP YOUR BALLS OFF YOU F**KING SCUMBAG!!!!!! D:<"). The user has also used edit summaries [62] [63] to attempt to expose an off-Wikipedia identity for User:Sro23. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 02:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. NeilN talk to me 04:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 04:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 03:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Oshwah. NeilN talk to me 04:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Guideline keeps being changed by IP. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. NeilN talk to me 16:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death, no useful IP edits for days. Few days semi should suffice. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined But not many Ip edits at all for some days; this is well under control. Lectonar (talk) 21:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – IP's and newbies adding soured "claims" on his sexuality, which has no WP:RS's. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try this at first, to get a little respite. It might die down, you never know. Lectonar (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. After the last revert, I have reverted to permanent semi; this will not be solved by protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persitient BLP violations by user NZwhiteout who has been warned for violating COI rules previously on article talk page. Semi-protection has not stopped the BLP violations and the edit warring, and the article should not be the subject of an edit war. . Patrick478 (talk) 01:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What BLP violations can give examples to? What instances of vandalism can you give examples to? El_C 01:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. We don't protect an article based on the actions of one registered user, and in any case NZwhiteout is a confirmed user so semi-protection would have no effect. There are a variety of means of dispute resolution available; Wikipedia:Third opinion is a good place to start to get a third view of a dispute between two editors. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow-moving edit war with neither party discussing. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 12:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Main perpetrator blocked; that should help to calm the situation. Lectonar (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

28 April 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs further protection, the sock knows how to circumvent SP. Used its userpage to do that. I would prefer a blue lock. I don't actually want this reduced, I want it upgraded. I don't know where to put the post appropriately. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 13:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar. — Maile (talk) 20:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Once again, the hosts of Hello Internet have caused a surge in vandalism from IPs and new users. —Granger (talk · contribs) 14:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Black Kite. NeilN talk to me 20:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing spate of vandalism from more than one IP range. RivertorchFIREWATER 16:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Mjroots. — Maile (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Border of Phantasm (Complaint Center) 18:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent addition of fake films by IPs. Trivialist (talk) 19:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 20:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP sockpuppet disruption related to accounts of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky/their most recent account Masheenya. Ss112 20:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. NeilN talk to me 20:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive editing by IPs (maybe the same individual IP-hopping). Deli nk (talk) 12:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of BLP violations; 2 or 3 days of semi should do. Lourdes 16:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spammers replacing entire nav template with their advert, mere minutes after the last semi expired. Murph9000 (talk) 16:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – continued vandalism by various socks, recommend highest level of protection for at least a little while. Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 06:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. El_C 07:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can it be raised to admin only editting for a while? TWaT is creating troll accounts and is continuing vandalism. --Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 07:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit warring by floating IP. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. — Maile (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users keep coming in and editing the sales for "Damn" and ignoring the note on there. The disruptive edits have been constant over the past week. . Jennica / talk 11:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Promotional. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:11, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. I can't get the accounts blocked for vandalism and WP:BLP violations, so let's see if someone can protect the article. This week. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 09:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. — Maile (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated.  Adnan Enaya Afzal  talk 10:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Both of them. — Maile (talk) 12:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Desperately needed, with reversion to last decent version likely. Increased attention via Google today. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 15:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: This article is restricted to extended-confirmed editors by WP:ARBPIA3 but is being fought over by mulitple IPs. Zerotalk 01:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 01:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 05:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
thanks! Jytdog (talk) 06:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article contains critical information about India, and the nationalists are not giving up in vandalising it. The messages being posted on it also appear to be personal threats to the editors involved. . Kautilya3 (talk) 08:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is only a week old. It's a little early to grant "indefinite". — Maile (talk) 12:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing edit warring ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 12:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: "Amir Deula" is semi-protected, and this article has just been created.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined—Not repeatedly recreated. El_C 04:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP editors, and very few people watching the page to revert it. Disavian (talk) 05:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 07:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected, but certainly insufficient for semi. @El C:, we crossed on that one, feel free to remove pending changes if you think they should not be configured.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Referees are constant targets for BLP violations due to the nature of their job. Please consider pending changes for this page. AIRcorn (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 02:01, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 05:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. El_C 07:04, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry that blocks aren't stopping. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 h, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP editor edit warring to include original research that is contradicted by a citation. Article was previously semi-protected because of this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Somewhere offsite seems to be coordinating multiple people in unconstructive edits. A brief period (I would suggest a couple of days) of pp-semi will hopefully make them bored with the project. Xover (talk) 04:26, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - COI editor re-adding self-promotional content, article was already protected once. Ignores several warnings and requests to use talkpage. GermanJoe (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah:, could you or another admin please review this decision? See recent article history (edit warring and likely block evasion). IPs in the same range also have a history of cite spamming and promotional editing in various other articles. I agree that article protection should be used sparingly, but the argument of "not recent" seems flawed when on and off disruption from a likely IP hopper has gone on for weeks. GermanJoe (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi GermanJoe! I did see the numerous edits made back on April 8 by the two IP addresses, but I felt that the edits happened too long ago to factor it in my decision. The article was also protected that day by ‎NeilN (which was the right action to take). Fast forward almost a month later, and I only see that a few edits have been made (albeit, disruptively). I felt that the rate of disruptive editing at this point in time didn't warrant protection of the article. However, I'm more than happy to leave this request open for other administrators to evaluate as well. If another administrator believe that protection is necessary, by all means - please feel free and apply them :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sro23 usally asks for it be unprotected upon discovering that it's been placed. Sro23, if you want it applied, just respond to this RFPP report and ping me. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, I'm not opposed to short-term protection. If the vandal is persistent enough then so be it. It's just the long-term (like week/month long) protection that I don't like. Sro23 (talk) 22:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 01:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a quick look at the page history says it all - IPs and COI editors gone wild. Toddst1 (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:52, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of a phone number, edits may need to be erased. Home Lander (talk) 01:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page has been subject to repeated IP edit-warring. Protection ended two weeks ago; the IPs are back. Chubbles (talk) 19:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Please seriously consider permanent pending changes as this is a highly vandalised article. AIRcorn (talk) 20:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruption rate is high, but it's only been going on for a day... I think 12 hours will be long enough to stop the disruption; they'll move on before it expires :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: On the most recent episode of the podcast Hello Internet, the hosts asked listeners to vandalize this article. As a result, a high level of IP vandalism has started. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Warring over changing "is" ↔ "was" done by IPs. --George Ho (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses. JackOfPanTrades Converse intellectually 16:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 17:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 18:34, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: High level of IP vandalism from new users and IP Adresses. Ldennis123 (talk) 21:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Plus 3 months PC protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

29 April 2017

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, long-term and from wide range of IP users. In fact most of the IP edits are not disruptive, but IP beginner are not able to read notes in the text and see talk page and its archives. So pending changes simply not work. It is tedious to fix these edits again and again. Long-term semi-protection seems to be best solution.Jklamo (talk) 20:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The PC protection will remain in place and will continue after the semi expires. MelanieN (talk) 21:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of the "owner" parameter. Should blow over in a few days. EricEnfermero (Talk) 20:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 21:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: long-term disruptive IP editing has resumed on this page. I requested PP a few days ago, and the IP in question was banned, but he's hopping to other IP addresses. Chubbles (talk) 20:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 21:43, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by sockpuppet of multiple blocked vandal. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war between IP's. Mdann52 (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism by different IPs which are believed from the same user who have been blocked. See Lowlihao. Night Lantern (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite PC protection will persist after the semiprotection expires. MelanieN (talk) 20:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editor continues to vandalize article, edit-warring with fraudulent/libelous claim to have created the character and sometimes adding messages to the text of the article. It's been temp-protected three times, but each time he returns to this activity after that expires. This activity has been recurring for more than a year.[64] -Jason A. Quest (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:08, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, removing perfectly fine information. IPs have also been reported (as has the user TomWatkins1970, who is a blatant sockpuppet removing the same material). Requested Tears on the Dancefloor be protected earlier, but one IP was blocked, and now they have returned with another (perhaps two) and the aforementioned TomWatkins1970. Ss112 09:07, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:19, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As explained above, this was before the blocked IP came back with another IP address as well as another account they registered to edit war. The problem extends beyond that page as well. Ss112 09:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.. Refers to Tears on the Dancefloor and Step One. MelanieN (talk) 16:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Refers to Steptacular. MelanieN (talk) 16:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:52, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained removal of same content by multiple IPs. Jim1138 (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopper disruptively adding content and violating WP:NPA in their edit summaries. Gestrid (talk) 18:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Not going to be here for probably ever, and I don't want anyone, including myself, to be able to touch this. Steel1943 (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 20:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – pc is not working, to much "action". Qed237 (talk) 15:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Depending on what happens when this expires, it may be necessary to semiprotect it all the way through the end of the competition in 2018. MelanieN (talk) 17:07, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry Talk to me 15:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPv6 and IPv4 same person reverting article back 18months persistent and disruptive. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. On 12 April, it was semi-protected for 4 days. When the protection expired, vandalism started up again. Can this time period be extended a bit more, perhaps? Thanks, TheMightyPeanut (talk) 14:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent viral post resurfaced, detailing previous vandalism of this kind. -- AlexTW 14:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created 3 times under this name and 3 times under the name Io games so both should be creation protected. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 15:16, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism.  LeoFrank  Talk 12:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP disruption as the article is being expanded causing nuisance. —IB [ Poke ] 12:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This will not solve all the editing disputes, since some involve autoconfirmed users and will have to be worked out on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 16:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced future events. [65], [66], [67]. AldezD (talk) 12:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Taiki0409 IP sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 07:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request just 48 hour protection till after the London derby Arsenal game due to recent vandalism. Govvy (talk) 11:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:04, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Mz7 (talk) 16:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Harassment from autoconfirmed socks. Sro23 (talk) 23:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. User has been blocked. --MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism as Added of Hoaxes as User:Taiki0409 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 06:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A rangeblock could be an alternative. MPS1992 (talk) 10:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term Protection: Persistent Addition of Unsourced Material & Vandalism without heeding the Hidden Warnings. ZeEnergizer (talk) 04:07, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Mifter (talk) 05:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:41, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: POV Pushing - big mess, it appears. Multiple IPs & registered Jim1138 (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users keep adding unsourced content to the article in the last months. They don't seem to have any concept of proper grammar or the Manual of Style, and they are continuing to be disruptive and change the prose on the article. Their grammar is terrible and their changes are disruptive as they keep making them and add nothing constructive. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 15:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Please try to engage the anon editor on either their talk page or the article talk page prior to reporting here. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Caknuck: Did you even look at page history? The user is using multiple accounts. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@TheAmazingPeanuts: Have you tried engaging the anon editor? Also, the anon has been using the same IP for the last two weeks. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Caknuck: Look at these IPs [68] [69]. And I try to get a reply from the editor right here, but this editor ignores me. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@TheAmazingPeanuts: This is not vandalism, nor is it obvious sockpuppetry. This seems to me like a new editor making good faith attempts to contribute to rap articles. There is not enough disruption here to warrant protection. Besides, the second IP you linked to hasn't touched the Hurricane Chris article in three months. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Caknuck: You are no help, well thanks anyway. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Highly visible template. UpsandDowns1234 (🗨) (My Contribs) 21:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is really high profile enough to justify template protection - it has 1300 transclusions but they're all on template documentation pages, which have very low visibility. Hut 8.5 21:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, it was intentionally downgraded by @HJ Mitchell: to semi in 2014, so he should be consulted before any change in protection. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the above concerns and in light of them am going to close this as Declined Mifter (talk) 04:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A disastrous music festival that's bound to attract a lot of bad IP edits. Billy McFarland has already been blocked for the same reason. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 01:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Mifter (talk) 04:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued addition of unsourced claims. - Mlpearc (open channel) 01:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 04:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user(s) are continually adding irrelevant information and removing information that is relevant from a section on an independent gubernatorial candidate. ALPolitico (talk) 02:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Mifter (talk) 04:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 06:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sock IP of blocked user persists in adding defamatory content. Lard Almighty (talk) 06:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 month NeilN talk to me 06:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Karst (talk) 07:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content, WP:BLP violations, several coordinated IP hopping vandals. 77.244.223.101 (talk) 04:19, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 05:16, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 77.244.223.101 (talk) 04:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 05:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 77.244.223.101 (talk) 04:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Needs protection, again. Removal of AfD template, poorly sourced BLP violations. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. -Mifter (talk) 04:48, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. PM800 (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – change semi protection and only create administrator.  Adnan Enaya Afzal  talk 01:25, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Ymblanter. Mifter (talk) 04:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 01:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term Protection: Long-term childish vandalism by IP-hopper. Crboyer (talk) 03:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:58, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temp semi-protection: Single IP-hopping vandal for 4 hours. ―Mandruss  03:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Koala15 (talk) 21:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of recent IP/new acct vandalism and disruptive editing. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 23:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (see [70], [71], [72], [73]). Quis separabit? 00:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:43, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (see [74], [75]). Quis separabit? 00:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term persistent vandalism (see [76]). Kaldari (talk) 00:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. (not enough disruption for semi but a slow edit rate and vandalism leads me to PC protection) Mifter (talk) 04:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Brankestein (talk) 17:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Can we just hold this for now? I can put pending changes on but there seem to be some IPs trying to add helpful stuff too....I am happy to revisit if issues persist. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP disruption. The IP in question has been reported but not yet blocked and teir most recent edit has also been requested to be reverted. Ss112 20:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7D:316F:6300:9C75:CDD5:A944:FDC5 (talk · contribs) blocked by caknuck. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Abuse of multiple identities (IP/account) to insert false/uncited content. Mélencron (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – the content repeatedly being added by PR agency and/or authors related to the subject. Coderzombie (talk) 10:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Already been dealt with at AN/Edit_warring. — Maile (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --- IP users keep coming in and editing the infobox, adding unnecessary information. The disruptive edits have been taking Place for sometime now. If I had not Patrolled this page, the page would have been stuck vandalised. I would appreciate a pending changes protection. Thanks MassiveYR 17:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 20:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long run of various 108.12.* IPs making disruptive edits. Murph9000 (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've blocked the 108.12.48.0/20 range for 72 hours. Bishonen | talk 21:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass ip vandalism . Jacktime34 (talk) 21:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've blocked the 2601:404:8180:8350::/64 range for a week. Bishonen | talk 21:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long term edit warring with one editor constantly reverting the other. I'm not entirely sure what the dispute even is since one of the editors only leaves edit summaries in Portuguese. clpo13(talk) 18:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Will post to talk page NeilN talk to me 20:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Short-term semi-protection: IP disruption. Slasher405 (talk) 21:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last night, Pace made a trade in the NFL Draft that's been quite unpopular with fans, who seem to be taking it out on the article. Zappa24Mati 22:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Requesting upload protection, as several editors have uploaded larger file sizes which do not comply with non-free content. Most recently a bot has even reverted such edit. Upload protection, whether it indefinite or temporary seems to be the only option left to prevent further disruption. Wes Wolf Talk 17:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Upload protected 3 months NeilN talk to me 20:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very frequent vandalism target, most IP edits are vandalism here. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This article is a frequent vandalism target, and has already gone through two separate one-year semi-protection stints. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 21:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30 April 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shoots past goaltender a lot vandalism. A Great Catholic Person (talk) 17:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. -Mifter (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Previous semi-protection was nullified by the expiry of the full-protection in response to an edit war. Nickag989talk 17:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing much in the way of BLP vios, as the article was semi-ed for nearly seven years, lets try a lighter touch before jumping back to semi. Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 18:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 19:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper has returned. Sro23 (talk) 15:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 fortnights, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page gets frequently vandalised by Rick and Morty fans since the new episode came out. Should be protected until the hype wears off.. intforce (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 fortnights, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content.  Adnan Enaya Afzal  talk 10:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 fortnights, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 17:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2405:204:5103:AB0B:70FD:E479:C15C:4665 (talk) 10:49, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent removing of valid information by a suspected to be a COI user. User Doodle2017 keeps on removing secondary source information. Kailliak (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been semi-protected many times over the years and every time the protection expires, the vandals are all over the page constantly. It's been proven that temporary semi-protection is not the answer. OldSkool01 (talk) 10:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (the request links to a redirect, the actual article was protected) Mifter (talk) 18:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This has been deleted for 4th time now. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rehmat Aziz Chitrali (2nd nomination). Saqib (talk) 12:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined see below. SoWhy 13:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and drive-by SPA vandalism (note seasonal surge in views due to 20 April cannabis holiday). Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: ah, it appears they've had some kind of controversy in the industry recently, that might also explain the vandalism. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 14:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 07:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, not recreated since 2008.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes is being overwhelmed by disruptive edits. It seems the editnotice is not enough to prevent these edits. Semi is required. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Bennv3771 (talk) 14:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We'll see if things calm down after that.--Mojo Hand (talk) 14:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit of Christmas series

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism--see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. --Finngall talk 09:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently a favorite target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Protected twice previously, most recently for one month. --Finngall talk 09:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently a favorite target of the Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Protected for a week recently--TFD waited an entire week after its expiration before resuming the vandalism. --Finngall talk 09:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 06:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism--see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Previous protection was for a mere four days, which was about as effective as not protecting the page at all. --Finngall talk 08:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent reverts since early March 2017 of well-sourced allegations (the allegations are in line with WP:PUBLICFIGURE), by numerous IP accounts, using identical edit summaries. Potential WP:SOCKING at work. GS 08:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by apparent IP hopper Jim1138 (talk) 08:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page seems to keep getting new users or users with very little edit history making changes and taking out information that doesn't shine a good light on the person. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Copyvio to boot. @NZ Footballs Conscience: Please read WP:NOTVAND. NeilN talk to me 01:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi User:NeilN Can you explain how that is copyvio. The match is only 19.4% and has been converted into own words. It is relevant information and should be included in this person personal life. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the match to article it is referencing is only a 8.3% match so even less of a copyright violation. [1]NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Posted on article's talk page - WP:CLOP. --NeilN talk to me 02:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP is trying to push a hoard of edits, other are rejecting it for some reason (I am not familiar with the subject. Courtesy ping Quinton Feldberg FilmandTVFan28 CityOfSilver. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 02:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP is now at AIV. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 02:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IP Blocked temp. by Materialscientist d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 02:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon repeatedly inserting/reinstating unreliably sourced content. Sitush (talk) 06:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A disruption from proxy servers in Adam Levine.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – To allow Template Editors to edit. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 11:06, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Xaosflux? --NeilN talk to me 00:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - by way of an edit filter this is part of the protection system now (c.f. Wikipedia:Protection_policy#User_pages), also as it is designed for editors to place on their pages without transclusion this is designed to have no "content". If something is needed to be added, please file an edit request. — xaosflux Talk 02:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 19:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The IP has been blocked for a month by User:Zzuuzz. (I'll try to keep an eye on the article.) Bishonen | talk 20:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]
I actually semi-protected it for a month before it was listed here. I saw it had been attacked by the same vandal who attacked the others here. --MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP content diepute. - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. six months by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 05:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We've had people removing sourced stuff, almost always IPs, for the past year or so. Dbrodbeck (talk) 03:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption from proxy servers in Oceania. Binksternet (talk) 04:01, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 05:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: Semi-protection isn't working out as well as a high volume of edit conflicts are occurring. One user, Trickeyfitz (talk · contribs), has been performing a high volume of conflicting, not giving everyone else a chance to put in information for the draft. Only those who are members of WP:NFL would be allowed to edit the article as the draft is still in progress. Slasher405 (talk) 19:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Slasher405: You want to block new editors from constructively contributing to an article? Seriously? NeilN talk to me 23:48, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN:: I'm so sorry. There has been absolutely a flood of edit conflicts at the 2017 NFL Draft article, because it's been a big-hit event as of lately. Things are starting to get Rocky here, and I'm so sorry to be all this early-wording. Slasher405 (talk) 23:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Self-declared IP sock warring against multiple users; currently at 14 reverts. Joefromrandb (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 22:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPv6 and IPv4 bogus content. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 23:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Repeated insertion of egregious rumours or allegations by users, especially as this article pertains to a minor. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit this entire year. NeilN talk to me 23:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce to template protection: As template editors can edit editnotices, I see no reason for this to be fully protected. It is no longer used in the MediaWiki namespace. – Train2104 (t • c) 22:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Looks like part of a failed initiative. NeilN talk to me 00:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: It's still used in some editnotices (see Category:Pages with editnotice Romeo notice) so it should be template-protected. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Train2104: All those templates are barely used. --NeilN talk to me 01:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: They're editnotices. Try editing Physical attractiveness. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Train2104: They're templates within edit notices. Take a look at Template:Ds/editnotice. Same thing, used a lot more heavily, but still only semi-protected. --NeilN talk to me 01:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring on the page even after I said "see WP:AVOIDEDITWAR.LakeKayak (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The only edits in the last week is a content dispute between you and one lone editor. — Maile (talk) 21:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – recent rash defamatory content multiple ips and an account. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism due to 2017 Stanley Cup playoffs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP vandalism and general BLP disruptions. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unceasing vandalism for the last 10 days or so, including BLP-implicating vandalism. Neutralitytalk 00:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 2 months NeilN talk to me 00:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from an IP-hopper. Simplexity22 (talk) 00:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism (blanking) by IP editors. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism by IP editors. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 15:04, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been recreated and deleted four times since a full deletion discussion. Largoplazo (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Euryalus. NeilN talk to me 00:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 23:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:58, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Vandalism by blocked user, inappropriate use of talk page. Jdcomix (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. by Zzuuzz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) Mifter (talk) 18:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:08, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 22:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A very large amount of recent vandalism by IP editors. There has been so much recent vandalism it has been very difficult to control it all. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 22:18, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 23:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Large number of vandalism by IP editors in last thirty minutes. Requires immediate attention. Richard n 22:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 23:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "Article referenced".