Deadman137

Revert on 2024 Stanley Cup playoffs

Was your revert of my edit a mistake or am I missing something? Looks like you just added the link back in your edit after the revert. Next time just try to be more careful, thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

There was no mistake. I can appreciate that you're trying to help though the last thing that I need is someone slowing me down no matter how well intentioned they are. Deadman137 (talk) 05:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

How does a legitimate edit "slow you down"? that's not a valid reason for reverting an edit and in fact is the opposite of assuming good faith... Honestly, that kind of behavior is extremely close to WP:OWN. @The Kip was there something wrong with my edit? I know you edit in this space too. Philipnelson99 (talk) 12:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

And honestly, I'm very confused as to how undoing my edit and adding the same link in your next edit is necessary. The link was live at the time I added it, and I made sure this was the case. Philipnelson99 (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

In fact, this concerns me even more now that I've seen User_talk:Deadman137/Archive_2#Unexplained reversion. If you think a change is unhelpful, that doesn't give you license to revert without explanation. Edit conflicts are not disruptive. Philipnelson99 (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

I had to undo your edit because the address that you put in creates an error in the web address supplied by the recap feature. The fact that you are not able to see the difference between the two edits is concerning to me as there is a distinct difference between them. No matter what I did I was going to have to fix your error, I just chose a time-effective way to do it and then you went off the deep end. Deadman137 (talk) 19:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

@Deadman137 from now on, you should always give a reason when reverting another editor. I see I made a mistake in using the template, but to revert without explanation is unnecessary and unproductive. I'm not going off the deep end, I was reverted, and an explanation would have been the appropriate thing instead of saying my edit got in the way. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Please make sure the grammar is correct. Also, should I use a comma to separate each item in a series? Khoa41860 (talk) 14:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Is it OK for me to put codes for the Wild Card teams: WC1 for the first wild card and WC2 for the second wild card? Khoa41860 (talk) 14:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Nope, two character limit in the template. Deadman137 (talk) 15:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

2024 Stanley Cup thanks

Well good sir, I appreciate your return to for the playoffs. I shall be taking a break from Wikipedia myself after the ITN stuff has settled. As always, great to edit with you. Conyo14 (talk) 03:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

@Conyo14: You've definitely earned a break with all that you've done in the last few years. I can only do what I do because you've been there backing me up for 143 playoff series. Let me know if you need help getting sources for ITN and I'll see what I can find. Deadman137 (talk) 03:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2024 Stanley Cup Finals

On 26 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Stanley Cup Finals, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. The Kip ^(contribs) 05:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring on 2023-24 Montreal Canadiens season page

Your incessant retraction of a wiki link included in the introductory body of the 2023-24 Montreal Canadiens season page constitutes edit warring. 2605:B100:B2A:2C5A:65E9:3C41:2A5A:4DA7 (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Hockey Barnstar
		Four your tireless work on the 2024 draft page and related ones. I could literally feel my brain melting having to deal with all the pick details, trade details, etc - I've got no idea how you do it! The Kip (contribs) 03:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)