This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello Davey2010: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, ~~~~
Welcome to 2017! Pppery 00:03, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Pppery and I wish you a very Happy and Healthy New Year too :), BTW I know we've had our differences in the past but I an others appreciate what you do here so keep up the great work! :) –Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Happy New Year!
Wishing you a happy, healthy, and prosperous 2017. Thanks for your friendship! -- WV ● ✉✓ 00:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Winkelvi, Thanks so much an I wish you a very Happy Healthy an Healthy New Year, Haha no worries but thank you! - After that shit in August/ September we still remained bosom buddies , Anyway have a great new year an don't get too drunk! , –Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year Davey2010!
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello Davey2010: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, JustBerry (talk) 00:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Davey2010}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Philip J FryTalk 02:54, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Codename Lisa (talk) 07:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
5 albert square (talk) 14:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—MRD2014 (Happy New Year!) 16:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Class455 (talk | stand clear of the doors!) 17:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
LinguistIf you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 18:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Davey, Thank you very much for remembering me, you brought a smile to my face. I hope 2017 started well for you. You have my best wishes for the holiday season and for the new year.
--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
To an awesome Wikipedian
Another year; another edit. Best wishes 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:38, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year Davey2010!
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Davey2010: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 23:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for all you did for this project in 2016, David. May your house be safe, and may you and those privileged with your company enjoy good health in a
Happy New Year 2017!
Kind regards, — SamSailor 01:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Have a happy and prosperous new year, Davey. Ueutyi (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy New Year!
Hi Davey2010 - I hope you had a very merry holiday season. May your new year be happy and prosperous! ~SuperHamsterTalkContribs 03:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Bah!
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Enough of these season's greetings and happy new years. Back to work, wiki-slave. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Oi It's Christmas/New Year!, I think we all slave enough on this site as it is , Okay I'm sorry Mr Scrooge I'll get back to work at once! . –Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Davey2010!
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Davey2010, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
John123521 (Talk-Contib.) RA 02:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Special Barnstar
Thank you for thinking of me and taking the time to write those sweet words. You have a great heart. Mona778 (talk) 02:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Mona778 - You're very welcome and thank you for your lovely season greeting too :), Thank you for the lovely barnstar :), Have a great new year x –Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 18:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy New Year to you as well. I'm only 2 days late, which by my own execrable standards isn't too bad... 78.26(spin me / revolutions) 17:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion
Happy New Year Dave. I see from your user page, Yahoo is not delivering emails; do you know why this is? My account is also aligned with a Yahoo account so I think I might have to do the same. CassiantoTalk 19:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cassianto, Thanks mate and a very Happy New Year to you too!, I had asked here back in August about it and in brief Yahoo refuses to send any WP emails because they think it's Spam, Bizarrely it works fine at Commons but just not here!, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 20:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
I never really understood why I used to get an email telling me someone had left a message on my talk page; to be honest, they were bloody irritating. However, I do see a hinderance when it comes to someone sending me a private email about something which they would rather not share on my talk page. I think I might swap email address'. CassiantoTalk 20:26, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
You can disabled mail notifications at [[1]], I'd disabled email notifications either the day I signed up or the day Echo was installed here,
Ah sorry I thought that's what you weer talking about - Nope all emails sent from editors via the WP system won't ever make it to you but I believe you can still recieve them with Google or Aol, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 20:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I have an AOL account so I'll give that a go. Incidentally, I see you are from Kent. I've just booked a weekend away to here. I loved the show (I was 11 when it first aired) but remember the series well. The older I've got the more that way of life has appealed to me. Kent is a beautiful county (with the exception of perhaps Gravesend and Margate). CassiantoTalk 22:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
I've never heard of that place but then again I've never been to Ashford - The views look amazing! :),
Unfortunately Margate's never really improved!, I remember going there in the 90s/00s as a kid and it wasn't a brilliant place back then but it was certainly alot better than today,
Yes, I forgot about Chatham, although I've never been. It's odd; I'm only over the bridge but I can count on one hand the amount of times I've been to Kent. Far to infrequently. I'll swap it with you for Essex any day of the week! ;) CassiantoTalk 23:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Hahaha nah you're fine thanks! , In all fairness tho it's the same everywhere - Some bits of an area are nice and others not much :) –Davey2010Talk 00:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Davey2010 . Im very new to editing on Wiki. The sources I provided seemed pretty reliable and genuine to me (especially the interviews). However, if they're not deemed as reliable for these articles then no worries, Ill accept your reverts. Thanks, Lucy LucyB-NYC (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Lucy, Please read WP:RS - Blogspot and a few others cannot be used here unfortunately, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 20:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Davey2010, thanks for that. Just FYI really, but I think what happened is that, because I (unavoidably) created the redirect (by moving the page back), Twinkle thinks I'm the creator, and so it lets me know that NASTY PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO DESTROY MY WORK!!! ;) the good thing is, because I 'created' it, I think WP:CSD#U5 probably applies. Thanks again mate and take care, O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 19:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, Once I checked the history I then realized what had happened - I assumed the other blokes name would've been there first but obvioiusly not lol, Oh damnit I'm sorry I'll revert my RFD at once , Annoyingly I didn't give CSD a thought ... I'm currently 97% asleep lol, Anyways If you want to CSD it I have no problems, No worries mate, Thanks and you take care too, –Davey2010Talk 19:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Night then! -I reckon if it happens again, you could probably use WP:CSD#G6, which is the sort of 'general housekeeping' one, since all you're doing is sweeping up rubbish by then. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 19:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Don't! .... It's only 7pm here!, Anyway thanks again :), –Davey2010Talk 19:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
"No current source"
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, Ah sorry because it was dead I thought that was you was referring too so my apologies, I agree there would've needed to be a current source for it, Anyway thanks for your message, Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 08:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Admin
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Get your adminship already! Don't let those suckas make you think it's some kind of promotion. Unrelated, I don't see a "new section" tab at the top of your talk page. Did you suppress that on purpose? Weird... (Not a criticism, just an observation.) Take care, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, Haha unfortunately I can't - many many reasons lol, Someone mentioned this back in December and I assumed it was just them .... but I've just realized myself there's no tab either! , I somehow added a magicword which disabled it because I'm an idiot and apparently pasted this magicword to the talkpage rather than the archives! ... Now you can see why I'm not an admin!! , Thanks for reminding me as I would have never of remembered it & thus noticed lol, Thanks & you take care too :), –Davey2010Talk 18:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Re. the above discussion
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I came, I saw the 'new section' tab, I conquered...! It isthere- or am I missing something...? O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 18:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi - No no no It's there in all it's glory now!!! , I decided to be an idiot and paste "NONEWSECTIONLINK" at User talk:Davey2010/TalkpageTop[2] - it basically removes the New Section tab, Bizarrely I did it last year so I have no idea if it disappeared recently or for the entire year ?,
But yeah it's back there now so you can use it to your hearts content lol, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Bizarre :) I thought it was something only I could see. IMAGINE THE POWER!!!! As for Rithie's point above... it does seem as if you find yourself with the consensus, in any case. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 18:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Nope everyone can see it ... Well I hope so , Hahaha why send one message when you can millions and millions haha, Exactly!, I just think it's bizarre one would think I'd say something "to look cool", But hey ho that's their opinion, Anyway thanks for popping by again - It's always nice to see you here :), Take care :), –Davey2010Talk 18:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I did it from a bot that didn't even visit your page... Hell, I didn't even visit your page. Apologies IhelpdןǝɥI 21:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi IHelpWhenICan, Oh okay no worries :), I thought you had just added the template & ignored the top but obviously not, Anyway thanks for the notification it's much appreciated :), –Davey2010Talk 21:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Personal attacks
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Don't reinsert gross personal attacks, like you did here and here. The person(s) who removed these were acting according to policy, your edits though violate WP:NPA. Further such edits will get you blocked. Fram (talk) 09:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Fram - I don't necessarily agree with the comment used however calling some a crass moron isn't exactly something to worry over!, Ofcourse had Giano called someone the c word or similar then I could understand but a crass moron ... really?, Needless to say I would happily revert the NPA censorship and the PC brigade on words that aren't remotely offensive and if you want to block me then so be it. –Davey2010Talk 15:00, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Nevermind I'm simply adding fuel to the fire so we'll say duly noted and move on, Happy editing. –Davey2010Talk 15:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
I mentioned you
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The joys of Wikipedia and the PC brigade, At this rate "plank" will be a blockable offence too. –Davey2010Talk 15:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Just thought I'd let you know- not talking about you behind your back- nor trying to pass the buck on to you two either! I like your "happy editing" btw :) O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 15:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
No no Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi it's absolutely cool, I've only just this minute came on so my next place of visit would've been his TP anyway lol, Thanks for the heads up it's much appreciated :), Happy editing (and yes I genuinely mean that in a nice way! :) ), –Davey2010Talk 15:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
You're not meant to be here...
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
...yet I still see you editing! Hope you're well, Davey. Are you meant to be on holiday? Let us take your strain for a bit. NördicNightfury 11:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Oh no no I'm on a course and I believe there's a system that takes screencaps of what everyone goes on so I'd rather keep my identify hidden there (and plus I'm worried my account will get hacked!), I'm on after 2pm basically , –Davey2010Talk 15:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Deletion discussion
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Whoops sorry I saw the box and just reverted, Hadn't realized you had kindly removed it so thanks for doing that, Okie dokie I'll comment tomorrow if it's open, Thanks for the heads up, Happy editing. –Davey2010Talk 02:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
RFPP follow up question
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Davey, in your RFPP request you mentioned "like Friday Download". Just want to make sure I didn't miss something here that also needed to be looked at, but doesn't look like that article has ever been protected and hasn't been edited much lately. -- ferret (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi again Ferret, Could the protection be changed to indef please as the IPs wont ever go (The List of FD eps was constantly temp protected until I got fed up & got it indeffed) - Most edits are made by registered accounts so no one is being disadvantaged, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 21:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm somewhat wary of this, but have decided to set indef as you've requested. I've also restored to what I believe represents the true last good, by BeanoMaster. -- ferret (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Addition of prohibited and unreliable sources.
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
You have just added a lot of "sources" from the Daily Mail. Please be aware that following the recent RfC, use of such unreliable sources is now specifically prohibited on Wikipedia. EnoughsEnough (talk) 22:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
I wasn't adding fuck all - I was rollbacking you disruptively removing them - there is a difference, Go and seek consensus for your removals or leave them be. –Davey2010Talk 22:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Apologies Class455 for reverting you there, I assumed you were an IP and clearly wasn't paying much attention!, Anyway thanks for the heads up :), Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 00:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
No worries Dave. I have however spotted some canvassing by the creator which I will mention about on the articles talk page once I link the diffs. Hope you're well. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 00:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps I'm wrong but I have a feeling the editor may be associated with her in some way - Seems a bit odd they're desperate for her to have an article, Yeah not too bad thanks and I hope you're well too :), –Davey2010Talk 00:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I was thinking this too. I also note that an SPI has been opened involving the creator. Yeah I'm not too bad thanks, trying to get a lot of coursework done while I have the week off college so I am a bit stressed, but I'll get through it. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 00:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Well that should be an interesting read lol, Arr well good luck with it all :), You could always ask for a bloke then you'd get more done haha –Davey2010Talk 01:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Leonardo is now Case Design Stili
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
This is the new name of Leonardo. Channel 223 (Digitale terrestre) [3]Driante70 (talk) 19:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, The article should only be moved when the channel is actually going by that name, At present they go by Leonardo, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 19:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
From the site www.leonardo.tv
Approda sul Digitale Terrestre CASE DESIGN STILI, il canale televisivo dedicato al mondo della mondo della casa, del giardino, dell’architettura, degli stili e tendenze dell’abitare. Un progetto avviato con il rilancio dell’omonima rivista che già si presenta con una nuova veste grafica ed un nuovo impaginato e che ora riapproda anche in televisione, al canale 223 del Digitale Terrestre. Case Design Stili non è solo un canale televisivo ma anche un progetto a tutto tondo, un vero sistema multimediale (televisione, stampa, digitale) dedicato a chi ama il mondo della casa e a chi vuole scoprire le ultime novità e tendenze dell’home design, dell’architettura, dell’arredamento e del lifestyle. Driante70 (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
No at the moment they seem to be going by both names and at the moment their social media hasn't been updated - Move and change the article in March as by then everything should've been updated, Changing it now would only confuse people, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Leonardo (Official Page on Facebook)
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Leonardo Official Page in Facebook is delated. Now there is the official page of CASE DESIGN STILI [4]Driante70 (talk) 19:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Well do it in a months time when everything has actually changed, thanks. –Davey2010Talk 19:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Forse non hai capito in TV non c'è più scritto Leonardo, ma CASE DESIGN STILI. Non è una cosa in divenire già da ora si chiama così, ma tanto non puoi capire perché non abiti in Italia.Driante70 (talk) 19:33, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
HappyTape & Burtonskill
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi.
Just passing along a heads-up - I've left messages on the talk pages for both Burtonskill & Happytape, as each is claiming that one of the poor quality gag images we've been removing is their own work, yet it's clearly the same person in each. Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:51, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Chaheel Riens, I've wanted to file an SPI from day one however apart from the same image uploads (and IMHO the same edit summary) I don't really have much evidence of them being the same person, Thinking about it I can easily file an SPI on Commons as it's not so strict over there, Give me 10 & I'll file one over there, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
As File:РАФ-2203 Латвия.JPG was clearly overcategorized, why did you revert my edit? --Joostik (talk) 09:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
My excuses, I see you mostly restored my edit. --Joostik (talk) 09:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Joostik, My apologies I have no idea why I used rollback on you, Anyway once I reverted you I then realized the image was indeed over categorized, Usually when I upload cars for example I would put what the vehicle was, where it was and something along the lines of "Automobiles in X",
With the above image I obviously have no idea where it is however some people might want to search and find Latvian vehicles so in that respect the "transport in Latvia" helps,
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I noticed a reverting of an edit on a userpage that I removed a category for being inappropriate. Why did you revert the edit? *Xyaena~* (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Xyaena, First off I apologise for reverting with Twinkle - I had actually clicked undo however the moment I clicked undo the page bloody jumped!, I had actually explained in the 2nd edit summary but incase you never saw - In short the user may of wanted it kept as a redlink but either way it's doing no harm regardless of the CFD, If DS wants to remove it then great but as it stands I see no reason to remove it. –Davey2010Talk 19:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
I did not expect to see profanities in the category was even fine. Alright then. *Xyaena~* (talk) 19:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
At the end of the day it's his userpage and if wants that cat then it's up to him, If it was more obscene language or even worse on an article then fine but it's not so I don't really see any need to remove it, Thanks & Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 20:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
The blue linked category at the bottom of your page
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi D. When I saw that you have the "User who do not wish to receive talkbacks" I was reminded of this wonderful song :-) Thanks again for your support yesterday and cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 20:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Haha , No worries MarnetteD, As they say you always get one who has to ruin the fun!, Don't let one moron stand in the way here!, As I said on your TP millions of people appreciate your help and contributions across the project so keep up the great work! :), Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 20:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your sentiments D. If we changed the lyric to "Yakity yak don't leave talkback" wouldn't that be a hoot. Even better would be to have it pop up whenever someone did try to use that template :-D Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 20:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
You're so welcome M :), Haha would be hilarious , Haha we'll have to propose it next year for the WMF improvement thing –Davey2010Talk 20:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Il mese scorso mi hai detto " No at the moment they seem to be going by both names and at the moment their social media hasn't been updated - Move and change the article in March as by then everything should've been updated, Changing it now would only confuse people, Thanks"
Io ho solo fatto quello che mi hai consigliato, posso capire cosa non va? Almeno un'occhiata a Wikipedia italiana potresti darla, dimmi che ne pensi.Driante70 (talk) 17:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, From what I've seen the channel still goes by the previous name, Italian Wiki is irrelevant and has no bearing here, As I've said I would suggest you file a request move, Not being Italian I may well have missed something and the RM could attract Italian editors, Also not be rude but could you write in English as my laptop cannot translate very well ... or at all really, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 17:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Winged Blades of Godric, In short consensus was to keep - Sources were provided and not only that but you're not going to find sources on a 17th-century Italian instrument maker online ....., Yep I ignored their !vote as it didn't make the blindest bit of sense, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I've brought it forclarification here. In my opinion, all social networking sites operated by the subject are their official websites. --Dirk BeetstraTC 18:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up Beetstra, I had actually taken it to the talkpage but agreed this is the best way to resolve it, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
For these issues talkpage is hardly ever useful, either you get a diatribe without end, or a handful of fans of the subject who try to override the global consensus with a local one. --Dirk BeetstraTC 18:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Well it was a start, Better than us edit warring without any discussion started (I wasn't to know you were going to ELN). Happy editing, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Holyhead
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Davey2010, I think you've already decided for yourself that there isn't a Holyhead bus station. I'm in the wrong part of Wales for me to be a local expert, but having travelled along Google Street View I can only see a long bus stopping space in front of the railway station. No sign of a bus station anywhere, or any mention on bus timetables.
On a separate note, I might try and revive the Merthyr Tydfil bus station article - it's a large terminus and looks like the plans to redevelop it have been publicised in the press.
Bye for now Sionk (talk) 20:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sionk, Ah okay thanks, Hadn't bothered with Maps seeing as I had no hope with web & book results lol, There were plenty of sources on it so if you want to create it then go ahead :), Thanks for your help anyway, Have a great week. –Davey2010Talk 20:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Editor's Barnstar
For your great work on making List of bus stations in Wales become an encyclopaedic, well sourced article. For the time you've taken in doing this, I think this deserves a barnstar. Keep up the good work Dave! Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 23:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Class455, Thanks so much :), Annoyingly I planned to do it back in 2013 however I ended up forgetting about it for the past 4 years and only come across my sandbox with the article in[5] accidentally!, So thought sod it I'll quickly get it all done , Anyway thanks for the barnstar - It's much appreciated :), Have a great week mate, –Davey2010Talk 23:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm not sure what was going on there, I was merely replying to several discussions in one edit. As you can see in my second attempt, where I only added the comment to one discussion in the "normal" way (i.e. edit section), it still converted to nbsp's. I suspect wikEd. 17:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Train2104, Neither am I ?, Obviously I thought you were replying and I only clicked the diff as was interested in seeing what redirects you replied too, For some reason it's still doing it ?, I have ED installed but I don't think It's happened with me?, Maybe it has and no one's noticed , –Davey2010Talk 18:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Dreamland Margate Edits
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there, I noticed last night that the page for Dreamland Margate includes only 2 pictures, both of which show the park in a derelict state which it was in between 2006 and 2015. I added a nice historic picture from the 1920s plus a couple of pictures of the park today. However you have reverted these changes - could you please explain why? I think it is important to include some up-to-date pictures since anybody who looks through the page quickly without reading the text will get the impression that the park is still derelict, which is not true. I understand we can't be seen to be promoting the park, but I've had a look at a few other wikipedia pages for theme parks and they all seem to have at least a couple of pictures of the rides, as one might expect.
Please advise the way forward as the current page does not accurately reflect the current state of the park. Thanks,
Hi Peet13, First off thank you for uploading the images, IMHO 2 images added by you were promotional and shouldn't be in the article, I do agree entirely anyone looking through would get the impression it's derelict so I've self reverted but I've replaced one image of the ride with one as a whole,
I agree there should be images of the rides too however they're all promotional, if they can be taken as if you were a tourist for the first time (basically like a normal every day photograph) then I obviously wouldn't have an issue, Thanks & Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 14:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Davey2010, thanks for your help, the page looks good now, cheers!
--Peet13 (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Peet13, No worries, Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 17:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I would suggest changing this to a free image - keep as non-free if you want, but in my view, there is not enough c:COM:TOO to copyright it - I would suggest use a license of {{PD-textlogo}} - it really is just a one colour background with a fairly standard font in one colour. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ronhjones, Funnily enough I had wondered when I reverted you earlier, But anyway I'll change it all now, Thanks again for your help, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Vandalism
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
As I know from first hand experience edit warring doesn't get you anywhere - You should always discuss your issues instead of repeatedly hitting undo, The moment there's an edit war you need to go straight to the talkpage. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Letterkenny
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hello Davey2010, I just wanted to find out a bit more about this edit to Letterkenny. It reverted a series of edits by an editor who seemed to be mostly removing inappropriate, unencyclopedic (and generally uncited) material from the article. For example, restored content on the music scene was either citation needed or a list of visiting acts with a nightclub as source. The Crime section has been making dramatic claims which make Letterkenny sound like a national hotbed of crime, as well as becoming like an "In the courts" section of a local paper. I'm not sure that Wikipedia is the place to list individual local crimes or even to have a Crime section at all, unless nationally or internationally renowned as such. Thanks in advance, Declangi (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Declangi, Looking at the diff I'm not sure why I reverted as as you say their edits were improvements and the cite removal was a good thing so not entirely sure what happened there, I'll readd their improvements now, Thanks for the message, Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 20:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Ah I reverted because a few cites were removed however looking now one's in Japanese/Chinese and another's dead, Not entirely sure if that section needed removing tho but anyway I've readded all of their edits back, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Many thanks for taking another look and that was fast! Agreed that some content in those sections remains problematic, but I felt that the editor in question was making a start. Declangi (talk) 01:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
No worries and Exactly every little helps!, Anyway thanks again for coming here instead of reverting, Have a great day. –Davey2010Talk 01:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Davey.
I just noticed this and this edit to Gag (BDSM) and BDSM articles respectively. Quack quack says it's the same person as Burtonskill and Happytape. I've left a generic warning on the IP talk page, but just letting you know. The image itself could probably do with being looked at from a licensing point of view as well? Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Chaheel Riens, Ah thanks for letting me know, I can't really get both articles protected as the image additions aren't a frequent thing, I've asked one admin if he'd block them but I may have to go back to ANI, I've CSD'd the image so should be deleted within 10 minutes, Thanks for the heads up much appreciated, –Davey2010Talk 15:19, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
So, did you read the special case? If you'd bothered to you'd realise that dates do not have to be consistent on each article - DATEVAR says specifically that special rules apply to dates in references. Actually read it and then go back and undo rather than acting as if you know the "right" way to do something in every case. Your edit summary makes it clear that you don't on this. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:18, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Do you honestly have an issue with me changing 2 cites dates to DMY ...... really ?, It's pathetic and no I shan't be reverting anything - If you honestly have an issue over this very minor adjustment then by all means drag me to ANI otherwise I would suggest you grow up and actually contribute to this place instead of moaning over a very minor and rather pathetic issue. –Davey2010Talk 15:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
DMY/MDY
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
WOW. An Endianism controversy gone wild. Remember, WOW is MOM spelled backward and upside down. You have my sympathy. Tend to it swiftly! And WOW/MOM is sort of a palindrome. {:>{)> 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for that :), Unfortunately I understand none of it tho , Anyway thanks lol, –Davey2010Talk 19:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
With compliments! Mootros (talk) 13:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Mootros - I apologise for the comment however when removing vandalism you should always then readd the good edits after, Anyway thanks for the cuppa , Have a great day :), –Davey2010Talk 14:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry about this. I didn't realise that's what happened, when I used the diff function together with "restore". Thanks for pointing this out! Have a great day too. :-) Mootros (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Oh okay no worries :), Thanks Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 16:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Removing of radio schedules
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hi you were removing radio schedules of KBS Cool FM, KBS Radio 2, SBS Love FM and SBS Power FM which were important information to kpop fans who want to know the programs of the mentioned stations, please don't remove the schedules and since your'e not a kpop fan don't mess with things that are not your interests or business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyunah661992 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hyunah661992 - Class455 is spot on - Not only does the content you're reverting fail NOTTVGUIDE but they're all unsourced/unsourceable anyway, If fans want to see times and presenters they can check the radios website. –Davey2010Talk 09:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Advisement
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Davey: You have an important message here. North America1000 16:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi NorthAmerica, Haha thanks I love it! :), Have a great day :) –Davey2010Talk 16:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deletion Davey: I told you before, I'm actually a unicorn. North America1000 16:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deletionism is my new religion, There's nothing satisfying than seeing an article deleted , Haha & I like riding them too. –Davey2010Talk 17:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Thank you for your help with the cleanup process. From what I can tell, it is two days past April Fools and we are living in it. Maybe it is Groundhogs day! TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi TonyBallioni, To be fair I haven't done anything - I've only deleted 2 of my AFDs & that's it, I had planned to do them all later on today but it seems now is better than ever, Anyway thank you actually for your help with it all, Annoyingly we had to clean up last years April Fools AFDs and I won't be surprised if we'll all have to do it again next year!, Anyway thanks for your help :), –Davey2010Talk 03:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I was referencing reverting an overzealous tagging here, which I consider part of the cleanup. Anyway, have a beer. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Oh right sorry, Yeah Zappy or whatever his name is appears to be going to mad with the CSD template!, I've warned him to stop before he does more damage, relists were bad enough!, Anyway thanks and you have one too! - You deserve it! :) –Davey2010Talk 03:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Not a problem. I think we're good with cleanup for now unless more people complain about the transclusions causing issues. I don't want to be the cause of people not having their fun, and I do appreciate the tradition side of it. Now for Netflix before bed. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Slight observation re your commons user page
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Dave, I noticed your post count tallys are a bit out - you jump from 4k edits to 50k edits, then from 90k to 10k.............. I think you need to redo them!! ;) Ta for now. NördicNightfury 13:30, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Nordic Nightfury, Wow thanks so much!, Not sure why the extra 0's ... perhaps it was wishful thinking at the time lol, Anyway thanks for your message & for noticing much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
McAfee move
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
I just saw that you reverted my move of Intel Security to McAfee because there was "no consensus." However, this is a uncontroversial change that reflects the current state of the company. Intel Security no longer exists, so why have an article about another company have that title? heat_fan1 (talk) 19:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Apologies for the long delay, That may well be however I believe this to be a controversial move and it should be discussed, It's always better to go the extra mile and actually get consensus for it, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Okay, I added the Request for move tag to the Talk page. For my future editing decisions, can you give me an example of what here might be controversial? If something like this is controversial, what kind of move might you consider uncontroversial? heat_fan1 (talk) 13:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
For more well known articles/brands I always get editors to seek consensus and plus I know at some point this year or last someone had changed everything to McAfee and it was reverted which is another reason why i wanted consensus to get sought, Thanks for setting up an RM tho, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
You are f***ing blocked
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
You have been f***ing blocked from editing indefinitely for f***ing swearing far too many f***ing times. For f***'s sake, less of it, you t***! If you think you should get off scot-free with this block, you can f*** right off. Mr Agreeable(talk)(cont) 14:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Mr Agreeable - Oh for f***sake I promise not to f***ing swear again okay? , Jokes aside thank you I needed a laugh! , Anyway hope all is well Richie, –Davey2010Talk 14:44, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
At least you've got decent roads in the US. This is part of the main road between Manchester and Sheffield, two places with a combined population of over a million, let alone the outlying area - seriously. Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 15:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Davey2010! I would like to invite you to help beta test the interface for InternetArchiveBot. IABot is a bot designed to help mitigate link rot on Wikipedia. Users can control the bot by using a Management Interface that was designed to be integrated with and similar to Wikipedia (For example, only autoconfirmed users can run the bot; on-wiki administrators have admin access on the tool; user permissions on the tool are flag based; logs are kept; etc.)
If you'd like to help out, feel free to give the interface a go to check for bugs/anomalies/other weird things and send your feedback to Cyberpower678, the bot operator. Again, the interface is at http://tools.wmflabs.org/iabot/ (If it's down for maintenance right now, it'll be back up shortly). If you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message. Thanks, —k6ka🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Restoring 420 Collab announcements that you removed?
Latest comment: 7 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
I thought from the discussion on the Collab page that you were going to go back and self-revert to restore the 420 Collab announcements which you removed? Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 06:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney - All notices that I removed have all been reinstated by me however a few different editors have either reverted me or removed them. –Davey2010Talk 15:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Cool, I'll AGF, but I've run across a couple pages where you were the last person to remove it and it was never restored, like WT:WPFILM. Just noting you may have missed a few. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney, If I have missed any then obviously it was accidental, Do you have any links as to which I've missed so I can revert, If not I'll go through my contribs again, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
No worries, I caught 3 or 4, but if you have a minute to quickly scan your contribs, that'd be great. I concur that we should've found a more standardized way to issue invites, and with more top-cover, though I disagree that we spread it egregiously beyond WPs where there's a clear crossover. No hard feelings, glad folks worked it out. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 18:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney, Okie dokie I'll recheck around 10/11pm, I shan't moan but I do agree there should've been a better way of doing them, Anyway thanks for your message, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi again Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney, I've checked my contribs and I believe all have been reverted, Problem is anyone could've edited the talkpages since it all happened so really I would never know and as there was about 200 reverted and reinstated I'm not going to open every page up individually to find out, If you know of any talkpages that wasn't catched then by all means revert, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Davey2010,
How have you been? I am not really editing here much due to now having Facebook and I also unfortunately broke up with my girlfriend 3-4 weeks ago :(
I noticed that you made an edit revert on some images on Vehicle, but when I added these, I used my high quality DSLR shots, which I found were a little bit clearer for the audience to view it.
I would like to get your opinion on the following images.
For the replacement of File:Tata Marcopolo Green Chandigarh Ind.jpg, I believe that the image of the bus is very badly framed and also does not look very good for the article. I have proposed the following images below that I would like you to decide to replace the badly framed image.
Option 1 (mailer_diablo)
Option 2 (my shot)
Option 3 (Au Morandarte – Flickr)
Please decide on the following images and see which of the three are the best for me to replace the badly framed image.
For the car, image, now my friend wants me to replace File:Luxury Car 2.jpg, with a high quality image which you reverted.
Please decide on the following images and see which of the three are the best for me to replace the awful quality image
Out of the three images, which one would work. I found out that option 4 is the best because it is perfectly positioned in the shot. Option 1 has quite a lot of reflections.
Please decide as soon as you can, because I then can finalise which of these would be suitable.
Hi EurovisionNim, I don't have a problem with you adding a few of your images here and there but in this case you were taking up the entire article all with your images which is unfair to other photographers, You're a great photographer no doubt about it but images in articles need to be varied authors not just yours. –Davey2010Talk 15:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
I just broke up with my girlfriend, so thats why I am not doing much thinking as I used to do :( --EurovisionNim(talk to me)(see my edits) 15:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Ah sorry to hear that, There's plenty of fish in the sea as they say, Take care & Happy editing. –Davey2010Talk 15:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Can someone help me sourcing information for some pages that i would like to edit. I edited them but it was reverted as i need to source it but i dont know how to. Percy2345 (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Percy2345 - Go to the article, Click where you want the cite to be added, On the edit toolbar click Cite and fill out the relevent info, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
I have added the relevant information but now need to add them to the departure list. I'm unsure how to do this. If someone could help please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Percy2345 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago13 comments7 people in discussion
Hello Davey2010, I deleted the references section in the Chutti TV page which may contain external promotional links. But I improved the page by adding the list of shows and animated movies broadcast by the channel and the content providers of that channel as it doesn't produce its own content but air the content aquired from other companies. It's all the reliable information as I am from India and follower of this channel. There is no chance for vandalism, so don't revert my edits
Reverted - The list was unsourced and you had also removed the various templates.... –Davey2010Talk 10:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Okay then, tell me what kind of sources to find for the list of shows and movies? Most of the shows are acquired without knowledge of common people and fandom. You can find the names of the shows in the list on the official website of Chutti TV and older TV schedules of the channel. But I found found some broadcast deals' articles of Chutti TV with other companies. Are those enough?
Hi 117.197.217.63, Yep those are fine, I should warn you tho that someone may revert per WP:NOTTVGUIDE - Personally I don't mind these lists providing each and every programme is sourced, Thank, –Davey2010Talk 12:44, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
BTW The Chutti TV website cannot be used as a source because the URL doesn't change (IE when you select Chutti TV from the drop down menu - The URL (http://www.sunnetwork.in/Program.aspx) remains the same regardless of what channel you select so unfortunately because of this it cannot be used), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Then can I please re add the list of shows and movies? I'll re add the content providers list after sourcing all those articles in the references section. --2405:204:6286:592C:FEDB:3716:DEF9:7BDA (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
I'll definitely source it. But as I said before most of the broadcast deals are done without the knowledge of public. Also as you said before that older TV schedules listing cannot be added. But I think those articles would be enough. Meanwhile you can add movies list and content providers list too and make them hidden until I source those articles in the references. Please do. --2405:204:6286:592C:47BD:B6A:6146:3CC (talk) 17:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
I absolutely understand and in all fairness it's not going to be easy but that's how this place is - Everything needs to be backed up with sources, I would advise you source atleast 90-95% of the content and I'll deal with the rest (If the programmes that are in the article are also on the Chutti TV website then leave those and I'll deal with them too), I've added everything back, I'll give about 2 months which should be plenty of time so if after 9 July there's not sourced then I'm afraid it's all going and shan't be readded under any circumstances, Thanks for taking this on anyway, Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 17:59, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, the list is in three coloumns side by side, it is looking very clumsy and inconvinent to read. Can you please change it back to single column? But as I said before most of the broadcast deals are done without the knowledge of public. So I can hardly source 50% of the shows. But for a channel like this it would be enough
I changed it back to single column and removed some of the irrelevant information mixed in it. I hope you let it be like that. Also I re hid it. The list shows are in broadcast order ie premiered on television — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:6286:592C:C81D:41C:228B:45A3 (talk) 13:33, 10 May 2017 (UTC) --2405:204:6286:592C:447D:147E:2B6:FBF8 (talk) 03:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Unfortunately they all have to be sourced - As I said for the ones on the website I can deal with them but the rest do need sourcing, If you can't find sources then the unsourced ones will have to be removed,
The 3 columns make it look neater and much more tidier however that's not a concern at the moment - I'm more bothered about the sources lol, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 15:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I 'll try then. But if I cannot source almost all of the content, will the (all) list of shows and movies be removed? Can I source past past TV listings then, if I find some? Also three coloumns will not make it neater in this case because after Chutti TV acquires content airs on their channel they change most of the names of shows and I added those names too besides the original name with an hyphen. So looks neater in single column, also then shows in broadcast order would be nice. What do you think?--117.197.225.135 (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Nope I'll only remove the individual programmes that aren't sourced, Ofcourse - By all means include "former programmes" too if you like :),
That is one issue to the columns but anyway source what you can and I'll play about with the layout after,
Ofcourse they can be in any order you like :),
Thanks again for kindly taking this on, Regards, Dave / –Davey2010Talk 16:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:54, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
RESOLVED
I'm not arguing over this as as seen at Talk:Car RG is correct and we're all wrong so therefore continuing this shit show will serve no purpose, in short I have the right to close any unrelated/semi-unrelated discussion and if you have an issue then bugger off to ANI otherwise give up, Accept you're wrong and move on. –Davey2010Talk 17:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You've not the right to collapse the only substantial part of that discussion. Consequently, your collapsing has been reverted. In future, please refrain from such attempts at hiding the substance of the discussion from the future closer. RGloucester — ☎ 16:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
See WP:SIGCLEAN for clear guidelines saying cautious collapsing of comments is allowed. Given that 3 editors support collapsing, and at least two additional editors have complained that the wall of text is unhelpful, rough consensus to collapse the comments appears to be exist. RGloucester, please stop. You're not helping yourself, or anyone else. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't really care about the 'complaints' of editors who haven't the concern to read the text in question. All of it is on-topic, all of it is relevant, and all of it deals with policies, guidelines, and reliable sources. I shan't have it be collapsed in this manner, as such clearly does not fall under the guidelines you've cited. People are free to promote falsehoods all they like, but they don't get to erase the suits of those who challenge them. RGloucester — ☎ 17:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
RGloucester - I have the right to close any discussion especially one that involves arguements that aren't helping and are infact taking up alot of the talkpage,
You disagree with automobile - You stated that in your oppose !vote so therefore badgering every fucker on that talkpage helps absolutely no one and infact the only thing you are doing is causing hostility and uncivilness with everyone,
I've seen your snarky tone with everyone especially when you can't get your own way however I won't have it on this talkpage so I would ask infuture you stay off this talkpage (unless it's relevant notifications),
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Chloe Khan
Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
Please stop being rude on that article. You removed all my edits there. You don't bother improving the article instead revert it all. This edit summary is deceptive, I did not remove any sourced content instead expanded it. The text regarding drug use and sex work is controversial and I added references which deny these allegations. You can't revert everyone's edits without giving edit summaries. They are not vandalism. Bellayelps (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
There was nothing deceptive about it - You did remove sourced content although you did replace it however the sources you added are all unreliable, As noted by Cassianto logging out to edit war really doesn't go in your favour and had you stayed logged in I would've gone to the talkpage alot more sooner, In short Gaming the system doesn't work and that in itself can and will see you blocked, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
I must admit, I have no idea who "Chloe Khan" is, and care precious little to make anything of the article other than what it is. I'm actually disappointed that it's turned out not to be him. He's far less evil looking, better dressed, and is definitely someone who I'd rather spend a month with, locked up in a shitty house with a load of fame-hungry plebs. CassiantoTalk 21:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Oh no Cass you would love her I mean doesn't this image just scream beautiful!, Same here between her and him He'd win every time!, Anyway it's nice to see around again Cass, Hope all is well anyway, –Davey2010Talk 22:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Khan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 18:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
handout for students editing articles about books/films
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there,
I'm hoping to solicit your feedback regarding a handout Wiki Ed is developing for students who want to work on articles about books: User:Ryan (Wiki Ed)/Books. It will be a print guide that supplements other resources and materials for student editors, like the interactive training and brochures that address broader aspects of editing, like etiquette, NPOV, citing sources, working in sandboxes, using the talk page, etc. This guide focuses only on aspects of editing required for contributing to articles about books in classroom settings. We're hoping to get some feedback from the community by the end of Monday, so we can send it off to the printer before the end of the month. I realize that's not a lot of time so no worries if you don't get to it. I see that you're active in both WikiProject Books and Film, so I'll mention there's one other draft we're looking for feedback on, for editing articles about films, if that's also/more of interest. Thanks. --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ryan (Wiki Ed), Sorry for the long delay, Unfortunately I probably won't be able to help as I need get 11 articles sourced (they've sat in my to do list since March and now I have a week free I want to get them all done), If I have a spare 5-10 minutes I'll take a look and chip in but can't promise anything,
Thanks for your message tho it's extremely appreciated :),
Have a great weekend, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
We have different definitions of long delay, I think. :) No problem if you don't have time, but if you find that you have a spare few minutes for a quick look, your feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, and good luck with your article to-do list! --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 01:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You are invited to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects throughout the month of June as part of the fourth annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign. Feel free to add new and expanded content on the project's Results page. Happy editing! ---Another Believer(Talk) 15:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
BGT 2017
Latest comment: 6 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion
Sussexpeople - The article has caps throughout so again for the fourth time you need to discuss it - Revert again and you'll end up at WP:AN3, Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 16:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
That doesn't make it right FFS. Sussexpeople (talk) 16:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Sussexpeople - Self RV or i'll file a report and you'll probably end up blocked - This is a collaborative project and therefore you need to discuss your changes on the talkpage like everyone else, Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 16:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
I've reverted. I hope that makes you feel better. I suggest you now look up the definition of "bullying". Sussexpeople (talk) 16:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Well it's a shame you didn't do that 10 minutes ago!, No bullying has taken place - As I said this is a collaborative project so discussion is a key part to this website - If you cannot or will not discuss things then this place isn't for you, –Davey2010Talk 16:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Davey2010! Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk)
For more information about Wiki Loves Pride, → click here ←.
RachelWex 21:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Userboxes
Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Hey, how did you get your userboxes on the right side of your userpage without interfering with anything else? It seems like whenever I do it, something intersects with the userboxes, but I saw your userpage, and it looked really clean with the userboxes all aligned to the right. How did you do this? –XboxGamer22408talk 20:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I'm having a go, hope you don't mind, but the clue's in the coding. Have a look at Davey's section and copy that, would be my advice. Failing that, I usually pester RexxS into fixing my coding problems. CassiantoTalk 20:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi XboxGamer22408, Do you mean the userboxes opposite the cars or the userboxes and the member of section in the box?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:59, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Already figured it out. I did mean the userboxes opposing the cars though. –XboxGamer22408talk 21:00, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
XboxGamer22408 - Okie dokie sorry I couldn't of been much help, Had I realised I would've said the exact same as Cass - Just copy it all and play about, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi George Ho, I was meant to have commented days ago but completely slipped my head so many thanks for reminding me - much appreciated, –Davey2010Talk 13:24, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trina Michaels
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I hope you reconsider here, this person doesn't have to pass WP:PORNBIO, she actually passes WP:ENTERTAINER, her porn attribution should increase her notability, not decrease. I think there is a bias on Wikipedia regarding pornographic material, however in the essence of Wikipedia policy this should not be the case. This particular actress should not be deleted and is different from the other nominations which that administrator has marked as she pass more than WP:PORNBIO. This person has been covered in books sources as well [6], [7]. Valoemtalkcontrib 15:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi Valoem, Okie dokie I'll have a look later, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
The image wasn't FROM a website, it says it's a SCREENSHOT Lauren's World (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Lauren's World - so how did you obtain the screenshot then ? .... It clearly wasn't with a camera or mobile.... –Davey2010Talk 21:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Lauren's World - When uploading images in future please include website links - I really don't want to keep getting on your case however we do need to follow policies and all that shizz so as I say include the links and all should be good, Welcome to the 'pedia anyway :), –Davey2010Talk 21:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Will make sure I do add links, ta for the heads up Lauren's World (talk) 22:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Lauren's World - Okie dokie, I mean we were all new here once so it's cool, The more you edit the easier this place becomes :), Anyway no worries - Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 22:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:FIAT Automobiles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for the heads up - much appreciated, –Davey2010Talk 12:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, Davey2010.
You are invited to join WikiProject Organized crime, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of Organized crime topics.
Please check out the project, and if interested feel free to join by adding your name to the member list. North America1000 21:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
How to use the latest citations for all Singapore Bus Interchanges
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Step 1-Click on the URL link Step 2-Choose the interchange you want to track Step 3-Press Search. That's it you have all the Singaporean run bus services
118 alex 04:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
118 alex - Not my job to source the bus services that serve these various bus interchanges, You're adding them so you can source them, If not they can be deleted. –Davey2010Talk 12:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
I think you may have missed the extensive discussion on the talk page about my change since you are advising me to go to the talk page.
The change you just reverted has nothing to do with the other change I made and which Volunteer Marek has engaged in an edit war over.
I have come here to try to understand your point and clear up any confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeadEyeSmile (talk • contribs) 00:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
My Apologies DeadEyeSmile I obviously hadn't realised you went to the talkpage first, Although there's a discussion it's more or less centered around you "belittling the source" - I'm not going to get into a debate over whether you are or not however my best advice is if you have an issue with Teen Vogue then you need to find a replacement source, if it's the text then it maybe best you start an RFC, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
No problem I am learning here so any guidance is helpful. I know that the discussion is very long winded so I don't expect you to read the whole thing. Can you point me to what is involved in starting an RFC? DeadEyeSmile (talk) 01:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi DeadEyeSmile - WP:RFC is basically Request for Comments - IE people can Support or Oppose whatever proposal you make on the talkpage and RFCs attract a wide range of editors who don't even edit in these topics - Ofcourse if you make a proposal and tons of people oppose then it's not a great idea to do another RFC as it would be closed instantly, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
I see, thanks for the info. Sometimes it is confusing how to proceed. Before your suggestion I did some research and thought WP:DRN was the right way to proceed so already did that. DeadEyeSmile (talk) 02:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
DeadEyeSmile no worries :), We were all new here once but meh once you get used to the place it does get easier :), Ah okay no worries, Kinda random but thank you for trying to resolve it - It's far too easy to get pissed off after being constantly reverted and having a thousand and one warnings flown at ya so thanks for trying to resolve it, Anyway happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 02:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Just wanted to let you know that your assessment of WP:DELTALK was slightly wrong, because there's a common circumstance in which deleting a user's talk page is the normal thing to do — when the user creates his talk page as a piece of spam. I'm always finding those listed in CAT:CSD. Nyttend (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi Nyttend, Ah so we do, I've just looked at the Deletion logs and there's tons deleted by various admins for various reasons, Was there some sort of RFC for this recently as I'm just so convinced this never used to happen ? Then again It's been a long time since I did CSD work so I could've just forgot but wouldn't of thought so ?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
If so, I'm unaware of it. Nyttend (talk) 22:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Ah okay, I have no idea but thanks anyway, –Davey2010Talk 00:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
User:118 alex has found a way to (illegally) hack into his main and sockpuppets despite the global locks.
Latest comment: 6 years ago13 comments5 people in discussion
Hi, 118 alex the sockmaster has found a way to (illegally) hack into his main and sockpuppets despite the global locks. He says he will hack into his sockmaster/puppets at 1600 Singapore Time. Could you/your fellow administrators block indefinitely (TP) access and disable email service to all his sockmaster(118 alex's)/puppets'((118(0-9)) alex's) Wikimedia Foundation accounts. Thank you and have a nice day.
180.255.242.88 (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi, He can still log in to all accounts but can't edit with them, If he abuses the email function then email access would be disabled but at this point as far as I know he's not abusing it so seems pointless disabling, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi SA 13 Bro, Thanks for finding that, One has to wonder how in gods name he's creating all of these accounts!, Reporting and blocking seems a waste of time if he just comes back and continues where he left off....., Anyway thanks for filing an new SPI. –Davey2010Talk 15:48, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
The CU admins will able to find out any sleeper account, so in this case, we are fine in WP:RBI. SA 13 Bro (talk) 16:04, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Ahhh right thanks, See I'm utterly clueless with all this SPI stuff :), Anyway thanks again, Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 16:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
This anonymous IPs seemed to be like User:118 alex's friend or relative, knew about his actions and movements very well. SA 13 Bro (talk) 08:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I saw your messages and I am scared at what you say. I heard about sockpuppets accounts and hacking stuff. I don't know any other account than this (being the original creator of this account). My account was probably hacked as I didn't chat with any administrator and I saw talking about Singapore Hour; I am from Romania. Was I using a VPN or not? I don't know because I share my computer but I am sure that person couldn't do this. I don't know what to understand...1193 ALEX (talk) 08:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
1193 ALEX, let's not get carried away. Some troll says someone hacked someone else--no reason to believe it. Look at your contributions. If there are edits made from your account that you didn't make, then you're hacked, or you suffer from amnesia. If not, you're not. Drmies (talk) 13:54, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Sorry for this disturbing but I don't understand what happened. I realized that my account wasn't hacked but I don't know why my edits were reverted... 1193 ALEX (talk) 04:29, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
@1193 ALEX: You shouldn't shared your personal computer or account to your friends or relatives, that is compromised accounts, and which against on Wikipedia policies, users who have been compromised account may result in blocking policy, so please make note on that. Your this edit maybe contain unsourced information and would get reverted by other editors, the Zu TV, which have no any sources existed in the article, regards. SA 13 Bro (talk) 09:31, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
@Drmies: I think we get trolled by 118 alex, he also make the troll at User talk:NinjaRobotPirate rather than better having User:Nate Speed here is mentioned, so we just WP:RBI, they're wasting our time. SA 13 Bro (talk) 10:03, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
That infobox
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
So just after I saw your revert I ran into Finnish Civil War, which has an infobox that's just as bloated as the Donbass one--and, gasp, it's an FA, so perhaps I'm totally wrong. But then I checked which version passed FA review, and it's this one, where there's only five names (and, thanks heavens, no flags). But perhaps it's the wave of the future? In the whole infobox dispute, I've been on either side, or neither side, but cases like this make me see the validity of some of the opponents of infoboxes. The "bloated" Donbass infobox, I just measured it--it takes up 17k, which is five percent of the article. Anyway, thanks--I appreciate the support. Drmies (talk) 03:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Drmies, I bloody hope it's not!, Good god does it really ?, I knew it would've took quite some space but never thought it would've been 5% of the article!, Looking at that infobox I'm debating on whether or not to remove the whole Commanders and Leaders bit and replace it from this version however not knowing much about the Finnish Civil War I don't know if those listed actually played a major role in it all?, Ah no worries, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Precious two years!
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Ritchie333, To be honest I was gonna keep shut but I just couldn't .... it was just too stupid to ignore!, I don't think I'll ever understand what i saw yesterday!, Anyway thanks for the barnstar much appreciated :), –Davey2010Talk 12:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I don't believe that the speedy keep was applicable, as I had voted for a delete; pls see: Wikipedia:Speedy_keep#Applicability. Would it be possible to undo the close and let an admin close it? K.e.coffman (talk) 04:37, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Usually I wouldn't close something I've !nominated however as explained at the AFD she does meet NACTOR - I've tried the whole debating thing with MQS however in short it's a waste of time - She meets NACTOR - It's a bullshit policy but I can't do jack about it, In reality the AFD's a keep so I'm afraid as per IAR the closure is staying, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
It seems like you are trying to get into an Edit War with me over the Brightside Primary School page. It seems to fulfill Notability to me. Perhaps worth discussing rather than just reverting. Michaelancs (talk) 15:01, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Michaelancs - As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES primary schools aren't notable unless there's indepth coverage in reliable sources ... which there isn't here..., We've both not reverted in well over a month so in that respect there's no edit war occurring. I'm assuming you're affiliated with the school which if that's the case you should read WP:COI, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Cheers for pointing me in the direction of those guidelines, had not seen them before. I am not affiliated with the school whatsoever, I have made a range of different edits over the last few months to various articles so found that assumption a bit presumptuous. Nevertheless, appreciate your help in pointing out the AfD document. Michaelancs (talk) 18:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Michaelancs, Whoops please accept my apologies - Judging by this post as well as your edits there I simply put 2 & 2 together and in this came up with 5 so apologies for that, Ofcourse if you could find reliable sources then I'd be more than happy to revert - Although I do have access to a library I quite honestly wouldn't know where to begin and there wouldn't be any guarantee I'd find anything so I said if you did or could find anything I'd be more than happy to revert, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Ultraviolet photography is one of the many visual technologies. This image of the rings of Saturn is an example of the application of ultraviolet photography in astronomy.
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The fleet is not unsourced, it does have a source indeed. My nameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 19:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
The source being a bus enthusiasts' web site (the website states this) - It's no different to me compiling a list of buses in an area and uploading them on that website - I could be wrong or could've made them up which can easily be the case here. –Davey2010Talk 19:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
I suppose you're right, the source is unreliable; I must admit that I had to ask the webmaster last week to change the depot location of some of the E200MMCs that Bluestar have, because I noted that they are wrong. Do you see any reliable way of having fleetlists? My nameisnotdave (talk/contribs) 19:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately I don't, If you wanted it could all be prosed I wouldn't really have an issue with that and I suppose the source could be used however He who shall not be named will no doubt remove that anyway so it may be best not to include anything at all, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Wowsers!
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
You are quicker at Twinkle page protection requests that I am. Thanks for doing it! Dolotta (talk) 01:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Dolotta, I did it the moment he reverted :), Would be nice if an admin actually did something about it tho but there we are. –Davey2010Talk 02:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
NFCC and resolution
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
re File:Uncle cast.jpg: Non-free media should be as small as possible while still serving its purpose (see WP:IMAGERES). The small version depicts the characters just as well as the large version, and there's no important details or text that the smaller version renders unreasonable, so we must use the smaller version. (for a counterexample to this, see File:Windows 95 Desktop screenshot.png). – Train2104 (t • c) 15:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Train2104 - There is no actual guideline as to how small images should be, That all being said I'll play about tomorrow and reupload a smaller version, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Forgotten Realms
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Okay, I think I got them all. Onel5969TT me 04:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Onel5969. Those were only the latest non-merges, for the record going back through 6/29/2017 that would include the following redirects after AFD:
Thanks Onel5969 much appreciated, I would've happily done it myself however I have a tdency to fuck things up when merging so figured instead of making a hash of it all I'd leave it to someone who won't muck it up so thanks for kindly taking that on :), –Davey2010Talk 14:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, I've been asked to look at this complaint in more depth. I've got to nip out now, but can I just advise you to leave the reverting alone for a minute. I know subjects shouldn't try and WP:OWN their content and legally I don't think they've got a leg to stand on, I get that, but I do sort of see their point that you're kind of doing the same as a tabloid newspaper paparazzi. After the whole kerfuffle with the Monkey selfie these things need a little light touch and diplomacy, which are sometimes in short supply around here. Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 11:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333, Not having a go at you but we shouldn't remove images "just because the blp doesn't like it" ... not being a dick but the BLP not liking the image isn't our problem, As I said at RFPP I did explain to Footmsudge what to do etc etc, That all being said I did plan to stop anyway as technically I never mentioned the talkpage or BRD in my first 2-3 edit summaries so don't really have much of a leg to stand on myself, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Also I've self reverted atleast for now and left a message on the talkpage in the hope it might achieve something instead of the back & fourth warring which is slowly getting no where, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In case you are still unaware of this discussion, there is a new discussion for renaming New York to New York (state). As you participated in the previous discussion on this topic, you may want to express your opinion in the new disussion. עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 04:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Tariq Nasheed. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ncfriend (talk) 13:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Your edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Davey mate, I noticed you made an edit reinstating images. I had a look at the review, unfortunately you have added back too many unnecessary large images causing the article to be squashed.
I simplified the article down by removing all the unnecessary images and made sure that the readers can read the article easily. I ensured a variety of authors to make it fair. Love to hear your responses --EurovisionNim(talk to me)(see my edits) 10:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi EurovisionNim, Alot of the images you deleted didn't need to be deleted however comparing both images yours does look a lot more tidier but some of the images removed didnt need to be removed, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
My recommendation is that you put only the necessary images required. Remember, as my Human Biology teacher said to me and I quote "Quality over quantity, if an assignment is 800 words, and you write 600 quality words with all the details, you will get a greater mark compared to writing 800 unnecessary words." This is the same with Wikipedia, keep it simple and neat. --EurovisionNim(talk to me)(see my edits) 13:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for stopping by my RfA candidate poll and for your comments. I'll look into getting some tools installed to make the process of closing AfDs more streamlined. Honestly the main reason I never got into it is because for closings I was always a bit more focused over at Requested Moves. I've installed the XfDcloser script, and I'll work with this a bit in the comming months. Thanks for your advice. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 14:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Insertcleverphrasehere, No worries, AFD work is often preferred as it shows you have an understanding of deletion as well knowing what should and shouldn't be deleted, Anyway happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 20:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for the info on archiving the talk page. I had no idea that bots took care of this! I simply thought the page was getting unwieldy, particularly with the complex mess in the top half. Anyway, thanks for the new information. Best, Castncoot (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Castncoot, No worries I mean in all fairness it was hidden under all that crap so it's no surprise you didn't see it, Had you been setting up a new archive bot and then archived it I wouldn't have had an issue but anyway no worries, Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 21:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Discussion invite
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Hi. Please understand that I cannot agree to your reasoning for reverting my edits to Rogue Traders (TV series), because there is a serious issue here that you are not understanding, so allow me to explain.
The episode list should be focused on the show's run between 2001 - 2009, when it was an independant programme and not a part of BBC's Watchdog, after the latter was revamped with a new set up. When Rogue Traders was merged to Watchdog, the programme ceased to be nothing more than a multi-part segment of Watchdog. As such, the Episode List as it is, is not only incorrectly set out, it does not correlate with the programme during its independent run on BBC 1. Keeping it on and saying "as no episodes are on the actual Rogue Traders website meaning the pre-watchdog eps may have just been put on the Watchdog website" is not a good reason at all. What is there must be deleted; the only episodes that should be there are those from the 2001-2009 run, not during the Watchdog era; those ones are films for the Rogue Trader segment, not of the programme itself.
I will revert again, but if I see you revert this one more time, I will refer the matter to another. I will not agree to your reasoning on this, but it is incorrect.GUtt01 (talk) 21:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Right let me explain as clear as I possibly can - I'm aware of the merge etc because I used to watch it - Right what I'm saying is this - There are no episodes on the Rogue Tarders BBC site okay ... so what I'm saying is the BBC may well have put these episodes under the "Watchdog" site even tho they were not Watchdog episodes at the time .... Does that make sense?,
In short the BBC may well have made an error no one knows - The Rogue Traders site is missing Series1-4 so somewhere along the lines they may have fluffed it all up..... Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:26, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
If that is the case, why do you keep putting back the episode list section? That is the Rogue Traders segment films for Watchdog; they shouldn't be assiocated to the article, because the article is about Rogue Traders when it used to be a programme, not as it is now as a segment of Watchdog. And surely there must be other sites out there that can reveal what those episodes for the 2001-2009 run? GUtt01 (talk) 21:36, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Do you have any actual proof these programmes were for Watchdog and not actually Rogue Traders?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
I don't proof perse, but there is no evidence that they have been shown as independent episodes, since Rogue Traders no longer operates as an independent programme. Also, these "episodes" are not programmes, they are films - when Watchdog was merged to Rogue Traders, the latter was made into segments for the former. As such, anything shown in these are merely films for the segment, not a programme in itself. GUtt01 (talk) 22:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
As I've said everywhere else I had no idea these were Watchdog episodes - I just assumed you were removing them on the basis of "You thought" ... I never gave it a thought to check so nope this was entirely my error so again my sincerest apologies!, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Mac Robertson Girls High School
Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, I would like to talk about the changes that you are trying to make on the Mac Robertson Girls High School page, but because you are engaging in edit warring instead of discussion on the talk page, I am finding it difficult to engage with you. It is well established that when there is a dispute, the status quo prevails until consensus can be reached on the talk page. Furthermore, your insistence that you have checked for sources before removing the material is questionable at best, seeing as the time difference in between your removals of entire sections was less than a minute, and even when I provided you with sources, you simply reverted them. But this is a matter for the article's talk page, not edit summaries.
I would also like to inform you as a courtesy that you are in violation of WP:3RR, a very important policy on Wikipedia. Because of our policies on assuming good faith, I will not choose to take this matter further if you undo your previous reversions, and seek consensus before making any more controversial changes (including, but not limited to, the removal of material). Peace! Orthogonal1 (talk) 03:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately you're the one that's edit warring, WP:UNSOURCED clearly states "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material", It also states " If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it."
As school articles like this get to next to none attention tags could stay for well over 10 years and still not be sourced,
Now you have added sources at the end of the paragraphs and that's great however each sentence more or less needs to be sourced still - Even if it's the same source being used 3 or 4 times in one paragraph it's better than just dumping one citation at the end of the paragraph especially when sources don't mention the stuff before where the cite is placed,
You're missing the point. From WP:Edit warring: 'An editor who repeatedly restores his or her preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether their edits were justifiable: "but my edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is no defense'. So even assuming that you are completely correct and I am completely wrong with regards to the content, this is irrelevant in determining whether or not you are edit warring. Please restore the content, and then we will discuss this on talk. Orthogonal1 (talk) 21:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Well it is .... you're adding improperly/unsourced material which therefore should be removed - If I were the one adding unsourced material then I too would expect it to be removed, The content isn't being restored however as I've said multiple times if you source each sentence then it can be readded...., if you cannot source each sentence then I'm afraid it'll have to stay off the article, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 22:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Also I should quickly add we don't need the over-detail on school magazines either - A simple prose would do and if you were add a simple sentence with the cite I'd be more than happy for that to be readded,
As for the alumni - LinkedIn isn't a source, "Martha Macintyre" doesn't have an article so regardless of sourcing she shouldn't be included, Last but not least we don't need school rankings either - That's wholly irrelevant. –Davey2010Talk 22:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
RfA
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. Cullen328Let's discuss it 16:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cullen328, You're more than welcome :), I'm so so pleased for you and as I said at the RFA it should've been done yeeeeeears ago :), Anyway congratulations :), –Davey2010Talk 17:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
typo?
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Regarding this edit: perhaps you meant another editor? Kudpung hasn't commented yet. isaacl (talk) 21:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Whoops thanks Isaacl!, No idea what happened there but thanks for noticing the error :), Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 21:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, I believe that the page over at Scania OmniDekka should be named Optare OmniDekka as I attempted to do before you reverted it while I was in the middle of editing the page to match; see also Optare Visionaire and Optare Esteem for convention on naming East Lancs/Darwen/Optare vehicles. Buttons0603 (talk) 17:35, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Buttons, The vehicle is always referred to as "Scania Omnidekka" - Techinically it may or may not be correct however it is COMMONNAME which is why I reverted, ofcourse If you want to start an RM I'd have no objections, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 17:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Articles for deletion/Ashish Bisht (2nd nomination)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Jinnu0007, The only AFD I closed was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Bisht and that was only closing after it was deleted by an admin - I'm not an admin but even If I was the article has gone through 2 AFDs since and both times deleted so unfortunately there's no chance of this even being undeleted and if created it's only going to be creation-protected so it may be a wise idea to forget this article and contribute elsewhere, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:11, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cyberpower678, Sure I'll do it now and I'll have the prev name deleted :), Just out of curiosity why me lol ?, Don't get me wrong I don't have a problem I love helping was just curious that's all :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:21, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
You're the first person to come to mind with the permissions to do so. :-)—CYBERPOWER(Around) 20:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Ah okay well thanks for thinking of me & asking lol :), Anyway all moved now, Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 20:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
, Anyway have a great new year an don't get too drunk! 
, –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.
, Annoyingly I didn't give CSD a thought ... I'm currently 97% asleep lol, Anyways If you want to CSD it I have no problems, No worries mate, Thanks and you take care too, –Davey2010Talk 19:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Unrelated, I don't see a "new section" tab at the top of your talk page. Did you suppress that on purpose? Weird... (Not a criticism, just an observation.) Take care, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
_Foon_Yew_5.jpg)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi Tanaka (3rd nomination). As you were a participant in the first and second discussion, you may be interested in commenting on this third nomination. Thank you. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 23:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Option 1 (mailer_diablo)
Option 2 (my shot)
Option 3 (Au Morandarte – Flickr).JPG)
,_SBS_Transit_(2016-01-03).jpg)
.jpg)
Option 1
Option 3 (my shot)
Option 4 (my shot)_(cropped).jpg)
_Ascent_Sport_hatchback_(2017-01-30)_01.jpg)
_Altise_sedan_(2017-04-22).jpg)
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg)
.jpg)
Template:FIAT Automobiles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
