Administrative backlog
editReports
editUser-reported
edit- 2600:1700:1CA0:6800:D4F3:2DD9:7EBB:E861 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. -- Alex_21 TALK 03:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: 2600:1700:1CA0:6800:0:0:0:0/64 is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 04:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- While an actual warning would have been nice, it looks like the underlying /64 has a regular habit of making exclusively these types of edits over months, albeit infrequently enough and under different ips that they might not even get warnings reliably anyway. For now I blocked the range in Talk for 72 hours to see if it helps any; it could probably go for more. --slakr\ talk / 04:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:182:67f:b060:6414:9cf6:d46b:c872 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Block invader. M S Hassan (talk) 15:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- SPAMMANER (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "spam" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- DaKidOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Pizzermeep (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "Used z instead of s attempting to skip filter: piss. Violating string: pissermeep" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Stupiddevin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "stupid" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ercsprivatelimited (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Basti hater (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Naronobot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "bot ?[0-9]*$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Name may imply an unauthorized bot. Do not block accounts in which the "bot" suffix arises naturally -- DQB (owner / report) 13:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Red Phoenix talk 14:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- PricklyCactus99 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Centerforchangeks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
edit- ClarissaBianchiRealOnlyfans (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Ternera (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- BaldiBasicsOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. ~Liancetalk 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- No edits at all. Secretlondon (talk) 16:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. Secretlondon (talk) 17:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ftc18225 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username implying shared use. Melmann 20:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- AAU Wiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:ORGNAME, promotional/copyvio userpage. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Centerforchangeks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:ORGNAME, promotional content on user talk page. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ashland Poetry (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See the userpage. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Crestwoodassociates (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. https://www.crestwood.com/ Johnj1995 (talk) 20:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 22:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 04:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous additions of the same unsourced information despite prior warnings to the IPs adding the information. One IP has previous block. CNMall41 (talk) 04:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced additions of character surnames by IPs are back after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 06:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism and probable WP:SOCK edits, removing content repeatedly, particularly a contentious subject in relation to 2023 Manipur ethnic violence. The user was warned, but same edits are being repeated from various IP addresses. Request extended page protection. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 08:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeat hijacking from socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Japansonglove. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 08:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A page related to the I-P conflict need to be ECP. Currently, IPs edit warren to remove sourced information Kentucky Rain24 (talk) 11:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 12:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of reversions recently, especially from brand new editors. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 13:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hopping IP continued addition of death template to an article subjuct who is not dead, maybe a /64 block. - FlightTime (open channel) 13:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR) Hoben7599 (talk) 13:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR) Hoben7599 (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Collaboration with Russia during the Russian invasion of Ukraine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR) Hoben7599 (talk) 13:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated lead disruption by IPs, unlikely to abate anytime soon. A long-term semi is needed. Gotitbro (talk) 14:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content & unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Complex/Rational 18:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Very high vandalisms. Also a very high visible page. please increase the protection indefinite. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 15:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent WP:FORUM violations by IP. Borgenland (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page is targeted by cross-wiki abuse (ja:WP:VIP#ドッジボール関連). Sakura Torch (talk) 15:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page is targeted by cross-wiki abuse (ja:WP:VIP#ドッジボール関連). Sakura Torch (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)fixed.Sakura Torch (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page is targeted by cross-wiki abuse (ja:WP:VIP#ドッジボール関連). Sakura Torch (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page is targeted by cross-wiki abuse (ja:WP:VIP#ドッジボール関連). Sakura Torch (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Requesting indefinite protection per arbitration enforcement (WP:CTOP). Nori2001 (talk) 17:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is a persistent effort to WP:AHIJACK this page. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: frequent unconstructive editing by new and ip editors over the past hour or so GeorgeMemulous (talk) 19:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP disruption. Previous semi expired in February. VQuakr (talk) 19:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's lock this up before we need multiple blocks. Moxy🍁 19:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: The protection is not needed as the disruptive edits by unnecessarily reverting are done by an extended confirmed user. The disruptive edits(reverting) are [1] [2] [3]. These constant and complete revertings of contributions done by multiple users prevents the improvements done to the page. That particular user is alerted in the talk page of the article and hasn't yet provided evidence to his claims. Not blanket page protection but page protection from this particular user is the one needed. അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's not an argument for unprotection, given the BLP issues FrancisSobieski123 (talk · contribs) introduced right before the ECP. If anything, that's an argument to escalate it to full-protection until a discussion has actually run its course. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Reverting contributions of multiple users citing an unreliability of a citation added by one user is injustice. Already the article lacks Neutral point of View(under the section Pastoral ministry and sub section love and narcotics jihad controversy ) that too on a living person, the reverting has undid my multiple contributions too, all with reliable sources that was to address this issue. That particular user's blanket reverting has done no improvement to the page. And that user who reverted my contributions hasn't yet provided evidence to his claim in the article's talk page when asked അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- You're still making a case for escalating the protection, not downgrading it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Reverting contributions of multiple users citing an unreliability of a citation added by one user is injustice. Already the article lacks Neutral point of View(under the section Pastoral ministry and sub section love and narcotics jihad controversy ) that too on a living person, the reverting has undid my multiple contributions too, all with reliable sources that was to address this issue. That particular user's blanket reverting has done no improvement to the page. And that user who reverted my contributions hasn't yet provided evidence to his claim in the article's talk page when asked അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: No puedo acceder 38.49.141.10 (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @38.49.141.10. The page is not protected. Or are you referring to something else? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Good morning, I would like to change the logo of the Cdiscount wiki page : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cdiscount. Cdiscount has change its logo this morning. I have the new file that Cdiscount want to be displayed on the wiki page. Could you update it or unlock the page so I can make the change please. Sincerly. Cds nlv (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- The link you've provided is for French Wikipedia. This is the English Wikipedia. We have no control over that. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done as unactionable by English-language Wikipedia administrators. Please request on the equivalent page on the French-language Wikipedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
editA historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrollededit
@Ryan shell has suggested me to request autopatrolled rights. I'm often creating simple articles about beetles in English (from the groups I'm personally already familiar with or learning about) and later expanding them if the existing resources allow me to do so. This is to allow other people to find this information and pictures more easily (otherwise it's often scattered on the internet and hard to find). I'm requesting autopatroller rights because I create large batches of articles at once, as Ryan mentioned. I only use reliable sources to provide information for Wikipedia Ipscaij (talk) 09:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I have written a total of 48 articles, including 6 in the past 2 days, mainly about hip hop artists. My articles usually have little to no issue. I'm requesting for the autopatrolled right to lighten the amount of unreviewed articles. Roasted; (talk), c. 00:07, 19 June 2023 (CDT)
A patroller suggested I apply for this following the creation of Asphendou Cave petroglyphs, probably a decent idea as I have a few articles in the pipeline for the Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest and don't want to add to NPP burden. CMD (talk) 02:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello—patroller @Aszx5000 suggested I apply for the autopatrolled permission. I've created 35 articles as of this request, most of them on California wildfires, and plan to continue roughly the same pace and pattern of article creation. Thanks! — Penitentes (talk) 18:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowseredit
I would like to have autowikibrowser rights to speed up edits that are too slow when done manually. I work with {{infobox company}} articles and would like to use AWB for speeding up edits that would take way too long to edit manually. WiinterU 00:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
I would like to have autowikibrowser permissions to make editing faster to make Wikipedia better. CGP05 (talk) 00:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I became aware of AWB on WikiProject Check Wikipedia while helping on fixing errors via Toolforge. I do have over 400 non-automated edits. I want to use AWB to continue my error fixing work more fast.--J. Lunau (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I don't really like typos and want to test tools like the AWB. I now have nearly 600 edits. I've been registered on Wikipedia since the beginning of the year. AX29 (talk) 11:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting autowikibrowser rights so that I can complete tedious edits, such as adding dozens of pages to the same category or adding navboxes to pages, more easily. It seems that AWB will help me with these tasks. I mostly work with New Zealand politics articles which are sometimes poorly categorised. Thanks for your consideration. —idiosyncritic 19:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to use AWB for common reference errors (i.e. CS1 errors), and filling bare references on many pages. Backlog reduction, basically. Also, of course, I would like to use it for fixing other little stuff like common typos and grammar issues. Thank you. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 05:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request AWB rights to assist in correcting reference errors and stub sorting. Specific areas I would use AWB to focus on are the items populating Category:CS1 errors: periodical ignored, Category:CS1 errors: missing periodical, Category:CS1 errors: unsupported parameter. Reconrabbit 19:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
As a WikiGnome, I fix a lot of spelling and grammatical errors. I want to use AutoWikiBrowser to be more effective. I promise to use it responsibly. Tonyfaull (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Recently, I have made hundreds of edits primarily consisting of correcting proper names related to Brazil and, more generally, to the Portuguese-speaking world. For example, I have fixed the name of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, President of Brazil, which was incorrectly spelled on dozens, if not hundreds, of pages (sometimes as Luís Inácio, Luis Inacio, etc.). Other cases relating to presidents of Brazil include José Sarney (sometimes spelled Jose Sarney), Juscelino Kubitschek (sometimes spelled Juscelino Kubitscheck), and so on, to avoid going into too much detail. Regarding place names, I have corrected Rio de Janeiro (sometimes spelled Río de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, etc.), São Paulo (sometimes spelled Sao Paulo, etc.), Brasília (often spelled Brasilia), and so forth. There are more to be corrected, such as Belém, Maranhão, and so on. That said, I would like to gain access to AutoWikiBrowser to make these edits more easily and efficiently, no more being so limited to redirects as I currently am. For what it's worth, I am fully aware of WP:NOTBROKEN, so I will not make changes to valid redirects, but rather to those with spelling errors ("Spelling errors and other mistakes should be corrected. Don't link to a misspelled redirect"). I also refer to WP:DIACRITICS, emphasizing that the changes I make are well-supported by English-language sources. Finally, given that AutoWikiBrowser is such a powerful tool, I commit to being cautious while using it, always following the principle "if I'm not sure, I won't do it", to avoid issues that could lead to losing access to it. I have some knowledge of regular expressions, which could be useful when operating it. Thank you, RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmededit |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmededit
Already have required number of edits, planning to get back to editing now. SerChevalerie (talk) 11:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File moveredit |
| Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message senderedit
Hey there, I'm acting as a coordinator of the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest until the end of September. The role will entail sending out a handful of updates to at least 40 users over that period. I haven't previously requested a mass message, but I've read through the information page and will follow it in good faith to the best of my ability. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page revieweredit
I'm interested in participating in reviewing articles related to music, people, films, and companies pending in the New pages feed backlog. I have been active in NPP and New pages feed, carefully reviewing notability and WP:BEFORE. Has good knowledge of notability guidelines. I would love to request a 3-month trial run. Thanks! Additionally; Recently identified a suspected case of WP:UPE. After thoroughly analyzing the user's activities, I reported the issue, resulting in their indefinite ban. Here; User Page 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 19:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I have over 1,400 edits and I have participated in both AFC and AFD, I also created more than 30 articles. I would like to help reduce the backlog. TheNuggeteer (talk) 12:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I have been given temporary NPR rights for 2 months trial which ends on 16 June. I don't think I've made any blatant error while reviewing pages and hope that Wikipedia is being benefitted by my reviews. I would still like to keep reducing backlogs of sports articles. RoboCric Let's chat 07:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
I believe I'm capable of reviewing new articles and drafts. Check my global contributions and user rights. Though this specific user group doesn't exist on ptwiki, my first-language/native Wikipedia, I believe I have potential in helping others creating articles and filtering enwiki. I have the draftify script installed and knowledge with policies. I've been working and have created some articles, such as Sapphism, Asexual flag, Plurisexuality, and Lists of LGBT politicians, as it shows, I have interest in sexuality area, as well as lists, categories, and redirects, as shown in my edits. --MikutoH talk! 00:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc.talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting the NPP rights to continue as part of my volunteer work in reviewing new pages. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I’ve reviewed pages on the new pages feed. In fact, I have sometimes CSD or redirected (because it’s a duplicate article) before NPRs, please consider me. 48JCL 12:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting NPP rights to be able to help out with reviewing new pages and to potentially help fix new pages. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello folks, my 2-month trial period is coming to an end soon, so I am submitting this request for an extension. During this trial, I focused on reviewing articles extensively to demonstrate my capability. I successfully reviewed and also nominated several articles for deletion, with a success rate of 99%. Therefore, I am requesting an extension to continue using this tool and contributing further. Thank you. GSS 💬 09:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC) GSS 💬 09:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I would like to request an extension of my temporary NPP rights. Though I haven't been as active as I expected, I still reviewed some articles and participated in the May drive (thanks for the barnstar). I enjoyed the experience and would like to continue helping out whenever I can. Thanks for considering my request. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 08:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page moveredit
Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy and though usually move those articles myself, they sometimes can't be moved due to technical reasons. I have participated in numerous WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008 04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
So I plan on using it to address page move vandalism and for other non-controversial tasks such as WP:RM.— Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes revieweredit
I am requesting Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia articles. I have been an active editor for almost 3 years, with over 16,000 edits. My contributions reflect a solid understanding of Wikipedia's content policies, including verifiability, neutrality, and no original research. I regularly engage in discussions to improve articles. I am committed to ensuring that pending changes are reviewed promptly and accurately. M S Hassan (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollbackedit
Can someone grant me rollback when they have the chance? Realized I forgot to ask for it after turning in the tools, and while I'm not around that much, when I am I prefer it to Twinkle. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Requesting rollback rights to more swiftly correct vandalism and other clearly improper edits. I have dealt with a variety of these over time, with demonstrated knowledge of how to warn and/or welcome with specific guidance tailored to the problematic edit in each case. Thank you. Informationageuser (talk) 05:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
As someone who constantly reverts disruptive editors and reports vandals to WP:AIV almost daily, I would greatly appreciate access to rollback permissions to facilitate my work. Skitash (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I had rollback on trial that expired about a year ago. My request to renew it was denied due to inactivity. I want to to request it again to gain access to WP:UV and WP:HUGGLE. Thanks. C F A 💬 21:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
|