CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
editAdministrative backlog
editAIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
edit- Nailausman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:18, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- 80.42.207.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- 马来西亚古晋人 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- KAWSAR SIKDER (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Cyber Murrow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 135 five times in the last 5 minutes (Repeating characters, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- 96.255.78.133 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- Mightyblack (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Evidently here to promote propaganda. Received final warning. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Page blocked x 72 hrs. This a new user and I don't think their intentions are malicious, although they appear to be disruptive. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Kielkiyama (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On SpaceGhostPurrp (diff): vandalism after final warning. BLP hoaxes. Binksternet (talk) 16:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- 92.40.212.54 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently a vandalism-only account. Recommend /24 block, lots of recent disruption from these ips 🔄️TryAgainSooner🕑 🗣️ 17:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Johndeer10poundbass123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Check edit filter for further vandalism. — BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- 124.215.136.214 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – proxy ip. Untamed1910 (talk) 17:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 3 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 3 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 9 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- DirtyDusek (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "dirty" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Дельницкий ардамат (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Назар Ножак (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jopisss (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Someone changed the spelling of her name lol (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Mybrotherinlawjackbateman (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- PolicyPolice45 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- 20pwilliamscolytongrammar (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Rean official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
edit- G2 Games (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. Username implies belongs to company, organization, etc. Would suggest soft block. Awesome Aasim 00:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Have they actually promoted anything called G2 Games? I couldn't see anything obvious at first glance. Secretlondon (talk) 17:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Maineprince (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spamming articles with links for promotion only. See Special:AbuseLog/38976283. Agent 007 (talk) 19:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 20:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- IreneRiskguard (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. As per User:IreneRiskguard. Agent 007 (talk) 19:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. This is similar to the "Mark at WidgetFactory" exception mentioned in the username policy. Cullen328 (talk) 20:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Asofficialug (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Appears to be here to promote "Asubo Ladies FC ". 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- BFGDStore (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. This is a YouTuber promoting himself. I'ts not a a business. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- F0r3verxl0s3r (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Foreverloser- I feel personally attacked. Joking aside, I wasn't sure if I should be reporting this. Happy to wait for edits. Knitsey (talk) 12:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- This certainly needed to edit first. Now we can see it's probably just the online handle of a teenage girl, nothing special. Secretlondon (talk) 15:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Queefinmybutthole (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Knitsey (talk) 12:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- They probably won't ever edit (most new accounts don't). Secretlondon (talk) 15:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Women4progress (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Violation of username as promotional (edits at Miss Progress International) and implying shared use ("women"). ☆ Bri (talk) 17:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The election related to this page is very soon, and as the event approaches, vandalism is likely to increase due to the controversial nature of the subject. 70P53D (talk) 08:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Chetsford (talk) 10:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. From AS-RNY (talk) 09:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. From AS-RNY (talk) 09:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has a lengthy history of repeated changes to the date of birth without reliable sources. Numerous attempts have been made by both IP and registered users to alter this information as shown in the differences [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. This ongoing issue is wasting a considerable amount of time for both the community and the pending changes reviewers, who are continually reviewing and reverting these vandalism.
I request that the protection level be increased to "extended confirmed user" to address this issue and allow the community to focus on other projects. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 09:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 09:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of content and references that don't align with each other.[12][13][14] Hotwiki (talk) 10:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Blanking of sources by an IP address which were replaced by sources that are not considered reliable. Wozal (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 14:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of BLP vandalism over the last couple of days, with IPs and new users adding an unsourced death date. bonadea contributions talk 12:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism (Hate based) Refael Ackermann (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 14:22, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic (ARBPIA) Procyon117 (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Ongoing attempts to add promotional information about this politician. VVikingTalkEdits 14:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi'd for one week Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 15:58, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent edit warring by IPs without taking concerns to talk page. Random IPs keep arguing about casualty numbers, ignoring the well cited evidence for such numbers, and reverting or changing the numbers without actual reason. Another editor said to take concerns to talk page, and yet, they changed the infobox yet again without any input into the talk page. An editor back on September 30th also fixed a mess up of well cited content by IPs,[15] yet they then just changed it again on faulty logic that they keep citing but is not even true regarding what they're using as evidence. Before that editor fixed it, another editor reverted the changes by IPs and noted it as unnecessary,[16] and continue to not cite sources despite all the cited evidence going against their opinions. This is the second or third time that protection has to be requested for the page. The IPs ignore the citations by scholars including Frieser et al, and Töppel. As a result of IPs not discussing at all, I have entered a new topic in the talk page for discussion as well. As of October 14, 2025, IPs are still changing what is agreed upon by editors.[17] Reaper1945 (talk) 14:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Was protected before for rampant BLP violations and other unverified content. Today, improperly sourced material was added again. — W.andrea (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption and vandalism, has been protected many times in the past so indefinite protection or at least a lengthier protection might not be a bad idea. TylerBurden (talk) 15:17, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of antisemitic vandalism BobFromBrockley (talk) 15:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The LTA IP harasser again (initals MAB). Zinnober9 (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Not done Reasons explained via email if needed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Recurring and recent IP edits contrary to Manual of Style. [18][19][20] ☆ Bri (talk) 16:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:
"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"
1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.
Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[21] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.
2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- @FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[22][23][24].VR (Please ping on reply) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
- My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
- If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[25][26] and a form of Holocaust erasure[27], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[28][29][30][31]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[25][26] and a form of Holocaust erasure[27], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[28][29][30][31]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
edit
| 21 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
edit- Golan1911 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets the minimum criteria, and a random sampling of their creations doesn't raise any red flags. My only concern is their liberal use of quotations in reception sections, but I don't consider it an overly serious issue for this permission as the copyright reports come away otherwise clean; I've also started a discussion on their talk page about it. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hounaam (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Dear Wikipedia Admins, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to further support my contributions to Wikipedia. While I may not have thousands of edits or article creations, my work is rooted in careful research and learning from experienced editors. My focus is on Iranian early modern, modern, and contemporary art and culture, especially highlighting the stories of Iranian women often overlooked in history. I ensure all my edits are supported by reliable, academic sources, and I have a track record of accurate contributions with very few reverts. I believe that having the Autopatrolled right would allow me to continue enhancing the articles related to Iran and Iranian art and culture. Thank you for your consideration. Warm regards, Hounaam (talk) 22:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- SafariScribe (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting the Autopatrolled right, like any other editor, to help reduce the NPP work load. I have worked at AFC/NPP/AFD, and I've created good articles that would pass a deletion discussion if nominated. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yut3117 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
They have created 60 Japanese-related articles, the majority of which are BLPs. None of them have been deleted, and no major issues were found upon my quick checks. Thank you. GrabUp - Talk 16:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ibjaja055 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 247 articles on English Wikipedia, covering a variety of subjects. I am currently a New Page Patroller and actively participate in Articles for Creation (AfC) and Articles for Deletion (AfD). I also enjoy turning the red links of notable recent deaths into blue, and I believe this right will help to reduce the workload at New Page Patrol (NPP). Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- SCreditC (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I have created 25 articles by 2021, none of which has been deleted. Recently, I created another 3 articles, and in total I have made 3200 edits (none of which has been deleted). These articles and edits are primarily about modern Chinese history, which I am familiar with. And I just realized I may have been qualified for the "auto-patrol" right for a long time, but never asked for it. Therefore, I'd like to ask to become an auto-patroller which hopefully will also save some work for the new page patrollers in the future. Thank you very much. SCreditC (talk) 03:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Rubystaramaryllis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets minimum criteria, no articles deleted, no behavior issues Mach61 17:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Originalmess (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets minimum criteria (by a hair), no articles deleted Mach61 17:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
File mover
edit- CMBGAMER 2018 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting file mover rights, because I accidentally put a grammar error in my recent file post. The file is called "John Hinckley Jr discusses on YouTube that he wishes for more Peace and Harmony in the World, 2023.mp3". I accedentally put 2023 instead of 2024, and I would like to change that. CMBGAMER 2018 (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Not done see the notice at the top of this page. Please use {{Rename media}}to make such requests. -Fastily 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
edit
- Nuvolet (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)
- A reasonable number of moves, but I not seeing any WP:RM/TR requests and am concerned by this RM which – based on the previous RM – seemed doomed to fail in the first place. This discussion also looks to be going against you. Primefac (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I only can say I'll be responsible if you grant me this right. I can participate in more TM, I just need to get usedd.to them. Yes it failed however I understood the norms and moved similar articles to Countryname. I opposed to Anatolian plateau because there are other geographical units that use capitalization in similar contexts. — Jɑuмe (dis-me) 01:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Raladic (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I recently requested page mover permissions two months ago to help with the post-move cleanup of LGBTQ related articles following the rename of the article (and related Portal:LGBTQ and WP:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies and related categories, following their respective RM's) and was granted the permissions for 2 months to automatically expire. I have since helped move a whole lot of uncontroversial pages to reflect the new consensus and participated in RMs for potentially more controversial ones, but there are still many more pages left, that I don't expect to be done by end of the month before my permissions would expire. I have since the request and the related Requested Move discussions gained a lot more experience in the space and find it quite interesting, so I'm coming here to request for the permission to be extended indefinitely as I would also like to continue to help with WP:RM/TR and getting more involved in being able to close RM's if they require moves with page mover permissions outside of just the LGBTQ article space, which I will continue to help move and the related post move cleanups (which I have helped do for not just articles I have moved myself, but also on behalf of several articles others have moved but missed to update related templates and such). Raladic (talk) 18:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Primefac (expires 00:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 18:10, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Done until the end of year, primarily to finish up this task but also for further demonstration (of which I genuinely do not see right now) of other RM and RM/TR-related moves. Primefac (talk) 18:09, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Compassionate727 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Lately, I have been closing a large number of RM and CfD discussions after they are cross-posted to WP:CR. Having page mover rights would allow me to implement many of the former and even a few of the latter myself, instead of constantly needing to post technical requests. I have read and understood the guidelines concerning its use, and I am happy to entertain any questions regarding my work in the area to date. Thanks, and God bless. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable, would like to wait for a second opinion. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done Hey man im josh (talk) 17:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
edit- DM5Pedia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cactinites (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Gonzafer001 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
To review pending changes on Wikipedia Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Cooldudeseven7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I have been a wikipedia editor for some time now and love to revert vandalism and unconstructive edits to prevent the spread of problems on wikipedia. I currently am a Recent Changes patrol and love my job! I have successfully achieved 1000 total edits (or ~ 325 mainspace edits) on the english wikipedia. I can't wait to be a pending changes reviewer, as it will allow me to stop the spread of vandalism even farther! Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 
11:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- TryAgainSooner (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I am a Wikipedian with a heavy focus on anti-vandalism work and would like this permission to be able to further contribute to the field. I have read the basic content policies, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:NOT. Also, I have contributed with many vandalism reverts and am already familiar with what vandalism is and is not WP:VANDAL and already have the rollback right. I have also read WP:COPYRIGHT and have helped a little bit in deleting copyvios that already existed. I would love to be able to help even more and expand what I can do. Thanks, 🔄️TryAgainSooner🕑 🗣️ 21:16, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yovt (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I have been active on Wikipedia for a while, focusing on improving content quality and helping maintain the integrity of articles. I am not new to reviewing edits, as I use edit-request tools to answer several requests by unregistered/registered editors that wish to see changes on several articles. I have read all policies on how to handle this right and know the responsibly that comes alongside it. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 16:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
edit- Cooldudeseven7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have done TWO rollback rights request, and I am happy to say that I have surpassed 200 mainspace edits and have also surpassed 1 month of Recent Changes Patrolling.I love the ability to help, and I already love to prevent vandalism with the help of Ultraviolet and Twinkle. I am ready to join the rollbacker force to get access to more tools, like AntiVandal and Huggle for even faster response. Don't worry, I won't bite the newcomers unless necessary! Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 13:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([32][33]). — MusikBot talk 19:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Could you please comment on this edit and subsequent warning from @Oblivy. Why did you make this edit and do you believe it was appropriate for Oblivy to warn you? -Fastily 05:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- I was a beginner at the time and I did not think that I would have to read the diffs for an edit that causes the word "its" to change to "it's." I really think that it was important for Oblivy to warn me, as it teaches me to never just blatantly use find and replace. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits!
01:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- For what it’s worth the rapid fire use of find and replace gave me some concerns. I did look through their edits and this seemed to be a one-off, and the immediate acceptance of responsibility and efforts to resolve are praiseworthy. OTOH automated tools in the wrong hands can cause a lot of havoc in a hurry… Oblivy (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I did not mean to cause any harm back then and I now decided that reading diffs is important and you cant just do a repetitive shortcut to find and replace on articles. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 17:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I did not mean to cause any harm back then and I now decided that reading diffs is important and you cant just do a repetitive shortcut to find and replace on articles. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits!
- For what it’s worth the rapid fire use of find and replace gave me some concerns. I did look through their edits and this seemed to be a one-off, and the immediate acceptance of responsibility and efforts to resolve are praiseworthy. OTOH automated tools in the wrong hands can cause a lot of havoc in a hurry… Oblivy (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey! This is Cooldudeseven7 again, and i'm just asking if there is any progress on this Rollback case? Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 11:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I was a beginner at the time and I did not think that I would have to read the diffs for an edit that causes the word "its" to change to "it's." I really think that it was important for Oblivy to warn me, as it teaches me to never just blatantly use find and replace. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits!
- Could you please comment on this edit and subsequent warning from @Oblivy. Why did you make this edit and do you believe it was appropriate for Oblivy to warn you? -Fastily 05:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- TheWikiToby (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
(Trying this again because one of my scripts broke the template)
I have been reverting vandalism and patrolling recent changes for over a month now. The last time my request was declined, I simply hadn't been patrolling for a month at that point, and @Fastily had no other objections. I have consistently warned all vandals I reverted and reported many to AIV. I believe I'm ready to have rollback now. Also note that I am a pending changes reviewer. TheWikiToby (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([34]). — MusikBot talk 17:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Daftard (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Hello, I meet all the requirements and noticed that some articles I have worked on/have an interest in, for example the Husain Al-Musallam page, that are well referenced are being subjected to whitewash editing by multiple accounts, many that have been blocked. Would be helpful to have the rollback tool to efficiently address issues like this. Daftard (talk) 04:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not done you shouldn't be using rollback for content disputes, and if an article has been edited by multiple users in a disruptive manner, rollback won't help revert those edits any faster. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- From AS-RNY (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been engaging in recent changes patrolling for some time now, so I'd like to request rollback permission primarily to be able to use tools, so that I can patrol more quickly and efficiently. Thanks. From AS-RNY (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 110 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 16:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- No I'm 500+ edits From AS-RNY (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @From AS-RNY 415 of your 500+ edits are actually from the user namespace. You have 110 edits in the mainspace which is actual articles. TheWikiToby (talk) 16:48, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- No I'm 500+ edits From AS-RNY (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 110 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Of your ~500 edits, 415 are to the user space as User:TheWikiToby noted above, and of those user namespace edits, 399 were to User:From AS-RNY/sandbox. Most of these sandbox edits consist of adding the word hello at a rate of several edits per minute until obtaining WP:XC status, which appears to be a WP:PGAME issue. @From AS-RNY: I think it's best to remove the extended confirmed permission until you have enough experience editing outside of your sandbox before editing in potentially contentious areas that are XC protected. Aoidh (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Noting here that I've removed XC from User:From AS-RNY per my comment on their talk page. - Aoidh (talk) 17:22, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Template editor
edit- Iwaqarhashmi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I'm working to make templates dark mode friendly, but since many templates are protected, I'm requesting template editor to efficiently implement dark mode compatibility. I've successfully made more than five template-protected edit requests so far (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), and I'd love to be able to make such edits myself without the need to provide an edit request in the future. I'm a trusted user, and I'd be more than happy to assist at CAT:ETP too. Thank you, Waqar💬 06:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
(guideline: >1 year, applicant: ~2)- (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~22k)
- (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 283)
- (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
- (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: >5)
- (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: >5)
- Primefac (talk) 11:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
- Done for six months for the purposes of dark mode adjustments. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting that Iwaqarhashmi should only use this for right for dark mode related edits? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, but that is their primary purpose as requested. As I explained on their talk page, it's a temporary grant because that is their focus and interest, but if they do find themselves editing in the template-protected spaces more often they are welcome to request an indefinite extension. My apologies to all for not being clearer in my initial statement. Primefac (talk) 10:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I'd say I was a bit confused when I first saw that I was granted these rights on a temporary basis even though I fulfilled all the standard guidelines. Honestly, improving protected templates for dark mode adjusments wasn't the only reason why I requested template editor. As I explained on my talk page earlier, I was infact, hoping to use it for other long-term purposes as well, but no one asked me about that in the first place. Would it be possible to request an indefinite extension now since I'd be needing this for the long haul? Thank you! Waqar💬 14:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Iwaqarhashmi a couple weeks before you expire just drop a new request here - we generally upgrade requesters to indefinite if they have (a) used the access (b) not broken things. — xaosflux Talk 15:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I'd say I was a bit confused when I first saw that I was granted these rights on a temporary basis even though I fulfilled all the standard guidelines. Honestly, improving protected templates for dark mode adjusments wasn't the only reason why I requested template editor. As I explained on my talk page earlier, I was infact, hoping to use it for other long-term purposes as well, but no one asked me about that in the first place. Would it be possible to request an indefinite extension now since I'd be needing this for the long haul? Thank you! Waqar💬 14:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, but that is their primary purpose as requested. As I explained on their talk page, it's a temporary grant because that is their focus and interest, but if they do find themselves editing in the template-protected spaces more often they are welcome to request an indefinite extension. My apologies to all for not being clearer in my initial statement. Primefac (talk) 10:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting that Iwaqarhashmi should only use this for right for dark mode related edits? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Footer
editPolicies and links