Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 289

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 285 ← Archive 287 Archive 288 Archive 289 Archive 290 Archive 291 → Archive 295

Jenine Desiderio

She is an award-winning Filipino actress who played Kim in "Miss Saigon". She is still active in the local showbiz. Her entry may have been deleted by rabid fans of her daughter (Actress Janella Salvador) whom she is currently having problems with —124.83.51.243 (talk) 03:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC) .

Sorry we have never had such a page. Where did you see it? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
If we don't have such a page, we probably should. She seems to be a celebrity, based on a quick Google search. I suggest to the IP to go to the article wizard at WP:WIZ and start the article. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lower East Preservation Initiative

I, RDM999999, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RDM999999 (talk) 09:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 19:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:J.R. VanHoose

I, Kaylamoore, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kaylamoore (talk) 16:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Was tagged as a copyright violation before deletion so I don't want to restore this. Hut 8.5 19:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Joni Greene

I, 65.36.67.4, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 65.36.67.4 (talk) 19:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 19:24, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

xvideos.com

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —69.176.26.4 (talk) 05:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page requested is presently a redirect to Xvideos and whatever existed prior to that is ineligible for restoration via REFUND as it falls under the blatant spam criterion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
    • The deleted article was one sentence long and that sentence just said that it's a great porn site. We won't be restoring that "article". Hut 8.5 19:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Image Production House

`—95.185.131.169 (talk) 06:31, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 19:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Fancy Alexandersson

I, Wenarjole, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wenarjole (talk) 09:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 19:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:TRUSTplus

I, BitcoinTrav, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BitcoinTrav (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 19:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

VR Sports Powerboat Racing

I, the author who requested the deletion, did so by mistake —Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

green form subsidised home ownership scheme

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Bcxiv (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Lower East Preservation Initiative

We would like to resubmit the article as our not-for-profit group, Lower East Side Preservation Initiative, continues to grow in stature, and we believe we deserve to have a Wikipedia page. Thank you, Richard Moses, President —RDM999999 (talk) 20:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

  Already done see Draft:Lower East Preservation Initiative. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:40, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
And please review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Hut 8.5 22:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ben Lamb (actor)

(no text provided) Jamesesco1 (talk) 15:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Sharmahd/sandbox

I, Sharmahd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sharmahd (talk) 23:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. Start over. Nothing prevents you from re-creating the page. The only content on it was "Some text for only testing the environment". I see no reason to restore that. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Akhil Talreja

Hi, with regards to your comment as "promotion of a local entertainer", Akhil Talreja is a renowned personality in India with a vast career spanning over a decade and his own institutes providing DJ education facilities in tier 1 cities in India. I understand you may have considered the article to be unworthy of use at Wikipedia, however I want to stress hard in explaining you that the article did have value. Having said that, if there are any links that you find promotional, we may definitely remove the same. Please take this sincere request from my end and suggest if there are any major action steps that we can take to restore the article. Thanking you in advance. —Deepmehta0507 (talk) 07:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Erikarai Sri Ramalinga Sowdeswari amman Temple jalakandapuram

It is my first article now , delete for un sufficient of reference, now collect almost all reference for this page , i request to un-delete my article for improvements —Amni86.instrumentation (talk) 06:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

You are going to have to talk to the speedy deleting admin user talk:RHaworth. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Unlimited L.A - Music Video Director

I was trying to compile his previous works and portfolio —Omodazzle (talk) 12:52, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

I, Omodazzle, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Omodazzle (talk) 12:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Creative Team ALT

Life got in the way, but I now have the time to edit the article —Fridayshoes (talk) 16:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Paula E. Kirman

I, Wearywordsmith, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wearywordsmith (talk) 17:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Anna Miller Corbell

I have more references for this article and would like to edit and resubmit it.Kcornwall (talk) 08:01, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Onni Group

I, Daylen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daylen (talk) 21:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

  • I suggest you consider contributing to Onni Group instead. The deleted draft here just contained an infobox and categories. Hut 8.5 22:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Solarflare Communications

(no text provided) Mtheumann (talk) 00:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

well that page was deleted as advertising, so you will have to convince the deleter: user talk:Jimfbleak to bring it back. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Coming To The Stage

I, ComedyFan2015, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ComedyFan2015 (talk) 01:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Total Wellbeing Diet

I, ClaireBTWD, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ClaireBTWD (talk) 06:16, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ESpatial Solutions

I, Gillianmc898, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gillianmc898 (talk) 10:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Zoosk.com

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —69.176.26.4 (talk) 05:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

  Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title is correct? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Possibly they meant Zoosk? Madam Fatal (talk) 15:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jon Stancer (singer-songwriter)

Our page was a 'work-in-progress'. We considered it a draft and we didn't realize that is was accessible by others or that we were breaching Wikipedia's terms and conditions. We believed that via our account login, we were creating and editing something to be published at a later date. We also didn't realize, that the article that we were working on could be removed and that we wouldn't be able to retrieve it, and it was the only copy of the article that we had. We would very much appreciate it if we could get our article back. That is our primary hope. If we are able to get it back, we will re-submit it to Wikipedia when ready (ie work on it offline). Please and thank you. —JSMedia (talk) 15:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC) [now Jasonschneider (talk · contribs)]

  Not done. @JSMedia: Because it was deleted in accordance with WP:G11 it is ineligible for restoration by request. You might try asking the deleting administrator Athaenara (talk · contribs) to restore it. Furthermore, your username violates Wikipedia:Username policy because it looks like a company name or shared account (further evidenced by your use of the term "we" in your request). Companies are prohibited from having Wikipedia accounts, and shared accounts are also prohibited. A username must represent only one person as an individual. Before you do anything else here, I advise going to WP:CHU/Simple and request a username change to avoid being blocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J.R. VanHoose

I, Kaylamoore, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kaylamoore (talk) 19:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

@Kaylamoore:   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Corey Hester

I, Theimaginenations, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Theimaginenations (talk) 07:27, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lewis Brindley

I, 109.151.214.201, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 109.151.214.201 (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Inetbiz

Both pages I believe were removed. I'm still learning WikiPedia procedures and syntax —Inetbiz (talk) 16:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. @Inetbiz: See the policies WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTPROMOTION, both of which your user page violated. There is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring it. Please review Wikipedia:User pages to understand what your user page can be used for. As for the deleted article you created E-commerce Security, it had no usable content, so you are welcome to start over, but I suggest you use the article wizard instead; see WP:WIZ. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:55, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

@Anachronist: Not seeking restoration of those articles. I have a user deletion tag on my talk page. ~Inetbiz (talk) 17:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

@Inetbiz: Your undeletion request was for your user page, so I responded accordingly. If you're referring to the sub-page User:Inetbiz/thirty bees, it was deleted in accordance with WP:G11 and is therefore ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You need to contact the deleting administrator RHaworth (talk · contribs). ~Anachronist (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

St. Hilda's & St. Hugh's School

The school is an active, thriving institution. We are not aware of any reason teh page should have been deleted. —Megohd (talk) 20:54, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page was redirected because, as an article, it failed our core inclusion criteria. Have newspapers, news magazines, educational magazines, and/or online equivalents of same written about the school in some depth, not counting interviews, enrollment/funding news, blogs, passing mentions, scandal rags, social media, wikis, or anything the school or its principals have written or commissioned? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Kambis Kohansal Vajargah

I, SabiMeier, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SabiMeier (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

John Yates (Culadasa)

I'd like to work on this as a draft, so that it doesn't suffer the same AfD fate as the deleted incarnation. There should be enough material to get this article above the notability threshold. —— Charles Stewart (talk) 07:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Since the AFD was unanimously voted delete, then deleted and closed by user talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus you should be asking Jo-Jo Eumerus. Perhaps the Cochise Stronghold has enough material for an article given the hints at newspaper and book writings, but that would need to start from scratch perhaps in a draft:Cochise Stronghold. Independent references are needed to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:42, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll ask Jo-Jo Eumerus. — Charles Stewart (talk) 11:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Request was actioned. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Dan Weinstein (business executive)

Per Jo-Jo Eumerus' suggestion, I would like to recover this draft so that it can be improved and resubmitted when notability is more established. —JacobMW (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Suggestion where? The closing remark in the AFD was "if there was substantial discussion of the topic by independent reliable sources it'd be OK to have an article on them". There was no suggestion that the article was restorable to draft space for some indefinite period until sufficient reliable sources are available. When that happens, we can restore it to draft space. I see no reason to restore it now, particularly in view of the fairly strong and quite recent consensus to delete. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
@Anachronist: Here is the discussion I was referring to. It doesn't need to be moved to the draft space, I was just wondering if I could acquire the copy so I could move it into my sandbox so we can add in any additional references and resubmit when the time is right. Would be very, very much appreciated. Let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns. JacobMW (talk) 17:21, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@JacobMW: My concern here is that we have a unanimous community consensus that the article should be deleted. If it is moved to your user space and nothing appears to make the subject notable for the next 6 months, it would be deleted again anyway. While I cannot read the mind of Jo-Jo Eumerus, the fact that the deleting administrator didn't userfy the article upon your request strongly suggests an unwillingness to override community consensus even for userfying or draftifying, and while referring you to WP:REFUND for such requests was correct, we generally restore or userfy articles deleted via AFD only when we have assurance that the notability situation has changed, and the deleting administrator approves. That isn't the case yet, as far as I can tell. When new evidence appears to indicate the subject is notable, then we can restore it to user space or draft space for improvement. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@Anachronist: Understood. Who should I loop back to when I feel the subject is more notable? JacobMW (talk) 18:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@JacobMW: Just post another request here, describing the new evidence of notability. Or you can contact me directly on my talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Logo Products

We would like to view our deleted content and make the necessary edits before submitting for re-approval. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qlpbret (talk • contribs) 15:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

@Qlpbret: Who is "we"? I'm not inclined to restore this until you have read and complied with WP:PAID. Also, do you understand Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, in that you should not be making substantive changes to articles on topics with which you're associated? ~Anachronist (talk) 19:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Totally promotional content. A short Yellow pages style directory 'entry'. Would have qualified for deletion under WP:CSD#G11 or at AfD. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Señora Acero (season 3)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —41.190.30.163 (talk) 22:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. The page isn't deleted, it's a valid redirect, and the contribution history is all there. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Chaplains on Call and Emergency Response, Inc

This is a page of a non-profit and there is no has been no violation, therefore, the page shall not be deleted. —Info.ccersa (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

@Info.ccersa: The fact that it's a non-profit is irrelevant. It was deleted because its purpose appeared to be to promote or publicize the subject, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Because it was deleted for the reason WP:G11, you will have to ask the deleting administrator RHaworth (talk · contribs) about restoring it for further improvement. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Laxmikant kale

I, Jgeigner, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jgeigner (talk) 22:37, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Tanner Buchanan

Buchanan has now had several quite notable roles, and is notable enough for an article. — Hallward's Ghost (Kevin) (My talkpage) 00:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. You will have to add a reference to avert deletion again, but there is one back in the history around 2014. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Solarflare Communications

I would like to work on the draft content to eliminate "advertising", and to increase its noteworthiness before resubmitting it —Mtheumann (talk) 01:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. The only way to "increase its noteworthiness" is to provide reliable third-party sources that discuss the subject in some depth. You cannot do so just by writing article text; you need to have the sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:02, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  Done I have restored the version deleted via g13, don't turn this back into a promotion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Subrahmanya Saastri

I was not given time to provide materials and sources asked for. I was not given time to look into improving it free from any deficiencies. I do not have draft copy of the same to publish it elsewhere. Pl provide entire draft in original so that I can redo it and make it worthy of wikipedia —CSHN Murthy (talk) 01:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

@CSHN Murthy: Yes, there is a draft copy. The article was apparently not ready for main space, and moved to Draft:Subrahmanya Saastri. Please continue working on it there, and submit it for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@CSHN Murthy: Cut the crap out.And WP is not some sort of place to pull off your theatrics and game the system.After my massive cleanup, including removal of your self-spamming, I asked you on 26th Nov. to provide sources or else be content with draftification/deletion.On 27th you supposedly abandoned your account and went for some sort of clean start without posting any replies to me on the issue.After days of radio-silence, on 3rd December, I draftified it.And, now today you're back spouting this nonsense.Remember, AGF is not a suicide-pact.Winged Blades Godric 05:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Bellamkonda Ramaraya Kavi

I was not given a chance once to improve delete promotional content of any and provide offline verifiable resources. Content was deleted without a notice for improvement. I would like to treat the content again as required for wikipolicies. —CSHN Murthy (talk) 01:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

@CSHN Murthy:   Not done. The article was moved to draft space at Draft:Bellamkonda Ramaraya Kavi before it was deleted. Because it was deleted in accordance with WP:G11 it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You might ask the deleting administrator Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) to restore the draft for further improvement. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Do not un-draftify.On a quick glance, it is an ill-sourced mess and many of the sources fails WP:RS by a considerable margin.Winged Blades Godric 05:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Central Square, Ballarat

Please undelete this article and put into my userspace —BugMenn (talk) 06:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. since this is a prod reversal it does not need to be userfied, but you can do it if you wish. Please add sources and more content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:eMagicOne

I, Org100h, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Org100h (talk) 14:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

@Org100h:   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Clare Verrall

I request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it to remove the resons for its deletion (copyright issues). — Preceding unsigned comment added by RealityTVnerd (talk • contribs) 00:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rohit_K_Dasgupta

I, Egaoblai, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Egaoblai (talk) 02:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:42, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:R.S. Field

I had a stroke and am recovering, and now that I am recovering I want to work on this. I don't understand why this is not approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FCC8:A102:8900:C82D:142C:D53C:4940 (talk) 02:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. more supporting references will help. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Free Congress Foundation

A lack of participation in the deletion discussion. Evidence that the organization simply changed names (and a desire to track think tanks which use that as a trick). It is relevant to the Cultural Marxism article. —Jobrot (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

China's Four Most Handsome Men (2)

person who deleted it has a massive hate boner against Chinese people —68.99.91.90 (talk) 08:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China's Four Most Handsome Men, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

China's Four Most Handsome Men (1)

China's Four Most Handsome Men. Archive link -> https://archive.fo/0omWF

Deleted by -> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Talk:China%27s_Four_Most_Handsome_Men


Some links about the four men.

http://www.theworldofchinese.com/2015/04/pretty-men-in-history/

https://www.cultureincart.com/blogs/news/four-handsome-men-in-ancient-china

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Vp_3saAZrUc&feature=youtu.be — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleguy (talk • contribs) 06:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  Not done see below, but you may create a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

China's Four Most Handsome Men (3)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —131.111.5.181 (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

There is no good reason to delete the page

This has been rejected twice above already as it was deleted via an Articles for Deletion debate; WP:Deletion review is the proper venue. See WP:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppetry. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  Not done and will not be done per the first request. Repeated canvassed requests will not help -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

China's Four Most Handsome Men (4)

Originally linked to from here: https://np.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/5ql30u/who_is_the_most_attractive_person_in_history/dd050xt/. As far as I can tell, this information violates no rules or policies. —Ashtontodds86 (talk) 19:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

This has been rejected twice above already as it was deleted via an Articles for Deletion debate; WP:Deletion review is the proper venue. See WP:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppetry. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  Not done and will not be done per the first request. Repeated canvassed requests will not help -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

China's Four Most Handsome Men (5)

this page shouldn't have been deleted. The deletion consensus discussion that took place beforehand was one-sided. —98.7.98.241 (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

This has been rejected twice above already as it was deleted via an Articles for Deletion debate; WP:Deletion review is the proper venue. See WP:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppetry. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  Not done and will not be done per the first request. Repeated canvassed requests will not help -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bosman Twins

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —2602:306:CCB1:E900:8AF:640D:E127:9E6 (talk) 02:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bosman Twins are noted jazz artists. The had a Wikipedia article and now it's gone. They are recognized all over the world and are featured in "All That's Jazz, by UK Writer SAmmy Stein. But somebody over there at Wikipedia decided to arbituraly take their page down. I don't understand.

I realise i'm not in the right place to complain...but I fee like I had to say something isn't right!

  Note: This page appears to have been deleted under speedy deletion criterion G5, indicating a page that was created by a sockpuppet account created to evade a block or ban, or a user editing on behalf of the blocked/banned user. G5 speedy deletions will not be overturned here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Simon Kolawole

I have more information to update the article and get it ready for publishing —OluwamayowaTJ (talk) 02:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:One in God

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Away_Resorts

I, Jmbroomie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jmbroomie (talk) 17:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (DGG (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Can I have the article restored as a draft and emailed to me (have enabled in preferences) and I will rewrite to meet requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmbroomie (talk • contribs) 09:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

When a draft or page is deleted under G11, as hopelessly promotional, the last thing you want to do is use the deleted version. You need a fresh clean start using neutral, impartial language, taking to heart the fact that we do not want anything here that even remotely resembles an advertisement or promotion. Make a new article that nobody would mistake for an ad or brochure or press release. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dan March

I, Natts, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Natts (talk) 13:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Abdulrahman Elsamni

The page should not be deleted based on A7 notability criteria because this person is very notable as a media personality in his own country. He is a regular guest in TV shows and often in newspapers. He has been chosen by EU to write about his country affairs. He is also a poet who publishes in press and a lecturer in the most reputable university in Egypt. —216.218.131.171 (talk) 00:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done this has been deleted 3 times now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Five user pages

They were deleted about a month ago because I wanted to quit Wikipedia. It turns out I didn't, and I will be around for a few more weeks or months. These articles shouldn't be very difficult to finish, so it'd be good if I had a chance to do that. Mr KEBAB (talk) 07:45, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

indecisiveness

I was considering beginning an article on this topic but I was told that an article existed previously but was deleted. I can find no record of why the article was deleted and the admin who did so has not been active since 2015. Furthermore, I cannot find any record of what the article looked like at the time of its deletion. Indecisiveness is a personality construct that has been the subject of numerous psychological studies. I believe there is a body of peer reviewed literature on it that justifies an article. If the page cannot be undeleted, I would at least like the deleted page to be emailed to me or userified so that I may review it and see if I may address any issues that led to its deletion. -slothjaw —Sloth-Jaw (talk) 11:47, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

It was a definition with no references, content by Ninjagecko: "Undecisiveness (usually indecisiveness) is the inability to make decisions on one's own. An indecisive person may believe that "time" will help them make their decisions. Some solutions to indecision involve asking someone else to decide, or flipping a coin." I think you should start writing again from scratch! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Trophy Wife (American band)

Page deleted for no viable reason, notable musicians involved in the band with properly referenced sources, beyond simply blogs —Bcdesignco (talk) 08:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

I'd rather see a trusted, established editor make this request. @Bcdesignco: your username violates Wikipedia:Username policy. Companies aren't allowed to have Wikipedia accounts. Only individual people are. Go to WP:CHU/Simple and request a change of username. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

@Anachronist:, I'm an individual. It's public record and I am legally allowed to use this name, according to the page you linked me to. The notoriety of this band exists. My personal status within the context of this request is completely irrelevant. So, will this page be un-deleted? Bcdesignco (talk) 10:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

@Bcdesignco: Your username looks like it represents BC Design Company, http://www.bcdesignco.net and there's also a Vimeo user "BC Design Co." with no indication that it's an individual - care to explain it? Companies are not allowed to have Wikkipedia accounts. You can try keeping it, but I advise changing your username to avoid endless future problems on Wikipedia. The article was properly deleted as well, in accordance with WP:G5. I'm reluctant to override an administrative decision to delete the article on the basis of a request of someone who appears out of the blue with a suspicious username and no other established history. I suggest you ask the deleting administrator Sphilbrick (talk · contribs). ~Anachronist (talk) 16:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
I have to agree with Anachronist here: this was a perfectly valid deletion and G5 deletions don't depend on the subject being non-notable. We do sometimes restore pages deleted under G5 if an experienced editor is prepared to take responsibility for them but this request is from a new account with no editing history. I suggest that anyone who wants us to have an article on this subject write a clean version. I'd be prepared to provide the sources from the deleted version to help with this. Hut 8.5 19:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
@Anachronist, Hut 8.5, and Sphilbrick: An archived version of the page appears to be sufficiently sourced so as to satisfy notability and well-written enough to satisfy tone. I'm not sure what "taking responsibility" for the article would entail (given WP:OWN), but G5 notwithstanding I would support restoring the deleted article based on its contents. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 23:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
I can support a restoration to a user page, but obviously not to Bcdesignco.--S Philbrick(Talk) 00:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
WP:PROXYING: Editors who reinstate edits made by a banned or blocked editor take complete responsibility for the content. So if it turns out to be (say) a copyright violation then it will be treated as if you posted a copyright violation. I don't like restoring content written by banned/blocked users as it encourages the banned/blocked editor to carry on evading the ban, but I won't object if someone else wants to restore it for you. Hut 8.5 12:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

The Graduate Institute

I, Conscioustwit, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Conscioustwit (talk) 00:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. The article isn't deleted.
There is a deleted draft at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Graduate Institute. Is there a reason you want that restored, when there's already a live article in main space? ~Anachronist (talk) 02:07, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

The article was indeed deleted. Would like it restored. There is NOT a live article in the main space. The live article in the Main space is a different school. The created page with 'The Graduate Institute is the nickname of the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies [1]in Geneva. The draft by conscioustwit is for a different The Graduate Institute - in Bethany, CT. Conscioustwit —Preceding undated comment added 23:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

  • The page wasn't deleted, it was redirected to another article. Hut 8.5 00:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
  • If it wasn't deleted, please provide link to where it was redirected. I don't think you can because I don't believe it was redirected. Instead it was deleted. Please restore. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
    • It was redirected in this edit. Before it was redirected the page looked like this. The fact that you can see these means the page isn't deleted. Hut 8.5 10:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
    • Two completely different schools used articles of creation/the graduate institute at different times. The one I'm looking for WAS deleted. The other one was not and is still available with a redirect. Here is the first move from TGI to The Graduate Institute 12/24/2014.:

20:38, 24 December 2014 AnomieBOT III (talk | contribs) deleted page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TGI (G8: Broken redirect to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Graduate Institute. If this bot is malfunctioning, please report it at User:AnomieBOT III/shutoff/BrokenRedirectDeleter) 22:46, 17 April 2012 Mabdul (talk | contribs) moved page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TGI to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Graduate Institute (disamb...) (revert)

AND the deletion: 06:12, 24 December 2014 Anthony Appleyard (talk | contribs) deleted page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Graduate Institute (G13: Abandoned AfC submission – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND/G13)

The Graduate Institute I am looking for is located in Bethany, CT. The Graduate Institute I am NOT looking for is in Geneva.

PLEASE CHECK TO SEE IF LOCATION IS GENEVA. IF GENEVA, NOT THE ARTICLE I AM LOOKING FOR. I'M LOOKING FOR A SCHOOL IN BETHANY, CT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conscioustwit (talk • contribs) 23:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.9.108.81 (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done Hut 8.5 12:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_289&oldid=1136434618"