BugMenn, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi BugMenn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Narraweena, New South Wales edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Narraweena, New South Wales, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

Hi BugMenn, let me explain that if you want to address a query to a particular editor, you don't post it to Template talk:Talkback, you go to that editor's own talk page which in this case would be User talk:Materialscientist: Noyster (talk), 10:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 22 March edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of St Ives Shopping Village edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on St Ives Shopping Village requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ariconte (talk) 12:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

BI-LO (Australia) edit

Hi BugMenn, just letting you know I've undone your latest edit to BI-LO (Australia). The claim that BI-LO is defunct (ie, no longer existing or functioning) is premature since BI-LO is still a registered Australian company with two trading stores, as you acknowledge in your edit summary: "pretty much defunct with only 2 stores left". Let's keep it factual until they do close up shop :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crētus (talkcontribs) 14:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Airbiquity. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. AFC decline messages include an instruction that they should not be removed. Perhaps you didn't notice that instruction. Do not remove AFC decline messages. While the draft is in the AFC process, they are a part of its history.

If you didn't notice that instruction, you know now. Do not remove AFC decline templates. When the draft is approved, a script will remove them. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strathfield Plaza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oliver Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dee Why Grand (May 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 14:12, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Airbiquity edit

  Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Airbiquity. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:39, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your move of this draft to mainspace has been reverted. The draft was submitted to AFC by the author, you do not have the right to sabbotage the process. I the edit summary you also falsely posed as a qualified AFC reviewer. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Request for Disclosure edit

What is your connection with Airbuiquity? Your persistence in getting it into article space, such as first by removing a decline template, and then by moving it to article space as if you were a reviewer, very strongly suggests an interest. Please make the conflict of interest disclosure, and, if appropriate, the Paid editing disclosure. (If you say that you are not affiliated with the company but simply think that it should have an article (and have pushed the envelope on proper behavior with the draft but have not bothered to take advantage of multiple opportunities to ask questions), then my own reaction is that that statement is incredible, that is, not deserving of belief by a rational human.) Please make the required disclosure or face possible sanctions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mirvac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harbourside. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Chatswood Chase and Warringah Mall edit

CC is most commonly referred to as Chatswood Chase not Chatswood Chase Sydney in much the same way that Westfield Chatswood is used as opposed to the official Westfield Chatswood Shopping Centre in line with WP:COMMONNAME policy.
Warringah Mall was owned by Hammerson until 1994.[1] Likewise it is now owned by AMP & Scentre.[2] I have removed the text re BMX Bandits. If you would like to add infomation please provide a reliable source and cite your reference. If you need help on referencing please see Referencing for beginners tutorial. Mbrjunc (talk) 23:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dee Why Grand (May 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 14:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurstville Central has been accepted edit

 
Hurstville Central, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

st170etalk 22:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reverts to Top Ryde City and Birkenhead Point Outlet Centre edit

Hello there,

Just like to point out that the reverts you recently made to those pages were made in accordance with the consensus with Wikipedia:WikiProject Shopping Centers/Anchors and tenants (WP:ANC). Listing tenants in a shopping centre article is What Wikipedia is not, in particularly it fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTGUIDE as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a shopping guide or directory. The External Links section, which appears at the bottom of articles, is sufficient enough to provide this information to a reader as this would be a consumers first point of call to gain information about particular merchants within a shopping centre.

Furthermore, sections removed also lacked reliable sources (WP:RS) and lacked notability (WP:N). Unsourced or non-notable content may be challenged or removed at any time.

As I have noticed you have been an editor only a short time, please familiarise yourself with the Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines in the future when considering editing content.

Regards, (Ajf773 (talk) 08:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC))Reply

Proposed deletion of Jamaica Blue edit

 

The article Jamaica Blue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schwede66 19:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eastgate Bondi Junction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JLL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edit summary 'clarity' etc edit

Hi BugMenn, thank you for your contributins to Wikipedia (WP).  
Though I basically agree with the edit to Dick Smith you made here, an edit summary of "fixed page" is not very helpful to anyone who may wish to review your edits. Please be more clear about what you did.

  • You sometimes fail to give any explanation for your edits, such as here, to Westfield Chatswood, and when reverting another editor's edits here.
  • We are not supposed to "... fixed up page in my own knowledge" (see WP:No original research) or change date formats without good reason as you did here at Westfield Warringah Mall. We also avoid the use of "currently" as it goes out of date quickly, but the use of "As at May 2016," (which you removed) is allowed.
  • Australia related pages generally use day-month-year dates, but (above) you changed a date to month-day-year (US) format.
  • Especially when removing content you need to say why.

Please keep my comments in mind while editing. As you are fairly new to Wikipedia I am only trying to assist you, regards, --220 of Borg 09:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Lavington Square Shopping Centre. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:10, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bass Hill Plaza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JLL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Lavington Square Shopping Centre. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:10, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Lavington Square Shopping Centre, you may be blocked from editing. • Gene93k (talk) 10:56, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Surf Dive N Ski edit

 

The article Surf Dive N Ski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Notability. The Sydney Morning Herald source in the article has little Notability value per WP:ORGDEPTH, announcements of mergers or sales of part of the business. I checked general Google search results as well as Google News search results. I found no additional sources making more than a passing mention.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alsee (talk) 20:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mandarin Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JLL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Surf Dive N Ski for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surf Dive N Ski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surf Dive N Ski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alsee (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Thornleigh Marketplace edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thornleigh Marketplace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 03:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Westfield Hurstville edit

Hi, I noticed you created the Westfield Hurstville article recently, however I wanted to caution you that lists of retailers are generally frowned upon and removed quickly by other editors when noticed per WP:ANCHORS. You may want to remove that list and keep some of the more notable and reliably sourced information about particular stores in prose form before another editor removes them all together. -- Whats new?(talk) 06:42, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry edit

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, BugMenn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Forestway Shopping Centre edit

Hi, Do you have any plans to continue sourcing Forestway Shopping Centre ?, The sources aren't amazing however the AFD looks to be speedy kept however you would need to improve this substantially otherwise it could be renominated and next time it could end up deleted, Thanks for your content creations here :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harbourside Shopping Centre (December 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harbourside Shopping Centre (December 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
NewYorkActuary (talk) 10:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Marrickville Metro edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marrickville Metro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 05:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eastwood Shopping Centre (February 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

re Westfield Mount Druitt edit

Dude, don't just remove the WP:AFD notice template from articles like that. That's not how we roll. Go to the AFD discussion and make your case there. Herostratus (talk) 05:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eastwood Shopping Centre (April 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JSFarman (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfD edit

  Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion on the article Capalaba Park Shopping Centre but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 02:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. I have reverted your AfD deletion tagging of Castle Plaza, Capalaba Park Shopping Centre and Lutwyche City Shopping Centre because no deletion debates were created after 14 hours. If you want the articles deleted, please follow the steps at Wikipedia:AFDHOWTO as noted above. You will need to create the deletion debates and state why the articles should be deleted. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stockland Glasshouse has been accepted edit

 
Stockland Glasshouse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Yash talk stalk 07:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marrickville Metro (June 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SM Makati (July 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl | talk 10:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Hut (July 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eddie891 Talk Work 15:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abenson (July 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by My name is not dave was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 09:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

blogspot edit

Hi BugMenn. Thanks for your effort to improve SM Southmall. Please note that blogs are almost never acceptable to use as sources. Therefore, I've removed one of the citations you included in your edit. RivertorchFIREWATER 14:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question edit

  Hello, BugMenn! I'm NewYorkActuary. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Mart has been accepted edit

 
Walter Mart, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SM City Manila (August 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeoffreyT2000 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 04:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Eastwood Shopping Centre concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eastwood Shopping Centre, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BugMenn/Westfield Hurstville edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:BugMenn/Westfield Hurstville requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia invites everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with Westfield Liverpool, have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Ajf773 (talk) 20:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Westfield Hurstville has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Westfield Hurstville. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Westfield Hurstville edit

 
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Marrickville Metro concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marrickville Metro, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:AMP Capital/doc edit

 

This is a notice that the page you created, Talk:AMP Capital/doc, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. --Pipetricker (talk) 15:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, BugMenn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Abenson concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Abenson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017 edit

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Chadstone Shopping Centre.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You are removing a lot of sourced content for Chadstone Shopping Centre and Westfield Southland articles, bypassing the fact that not one but two editors have disputed your edits. Content that is sourced (whether the links are inactive or not, is not a reason to remove the content, see WP:USI) cannot boldly be removed — especially if others disagree. You are now required to discuss the changes you wish to be made on the article's talk page and gain consensus, or cease making those changes. Further, MOS:LEAD does not suggest one reduce an article's lead paragraph/s from multiple sentences (which aim to summarise the article for the reader) -- to a couple sentences, as you have gratuitously called for. In fact, it calls for the exact opposite (a summary of the article). Please stop, discuss what exactly it is you are doing, and we can go on from there. Regards,MelbourneStartalk 07:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Narellan Town Centre (December 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:27, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snowy Hill Park (December 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Abenson edit

 

Hello, BugMenn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abenson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JustaZBguy (talk) 22:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Marrickville Metro edit

 

Hello, BugMenn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marrickville Metro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JustaZBguy (talk) 23:39, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Anaconda (Outdoor & Adventure Specialist) edit

 

Hello, BugMenn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anaconda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 05:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:BugMenn/Eastwood Shopping Centre concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:BugMenn/Eastwood Shopping Centre, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:BugMenn/Eastwood Shopping Centre edit

 

Hello, BugMenn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eastwood Shopping Centre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Snowy Hill Park concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Snowy Hill Park, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Narellan Town Centre concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Narellan Town Centre, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:SM City Manila edit

 

Hello, BugMenn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SM City Manila".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 13:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, BugMenn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Splash Island (Biñan) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Splash Island (Biñan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splash Island (Biñan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:31, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019 edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Woolworths Metro, from its old location at User:BugMenn/Woolworths Metro. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Woolworths Metro concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Woolworths Metro, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 19 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westfield Burwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burwood railway station. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lighthouse Dee Why (October 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 04:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Warriewood Square carpark sign.JPG edit

 

The file File:Warriewood Square carpark sign.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 09:57, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Woolworths Metro edit

  Hello, BugMenn. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Woolworths Metro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 10:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit reversion edit

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Woolworths Metro edit

 

Hello, BugMenn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Woolworths Metro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Southpoint Shopping Centre edit

 

The article Southpoint Shopping Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Small shopping center. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 13:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Onel5969 my bad for making Southpoint Shopping Centre into an article would you like me to move it back into a draft space if it doesn't improve by March 28. - BugMenn (talk) 12:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rowen's Arcade has been accepted edit

 
Rowen's Arcade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southgate Shopping Centre (Australia) has been accepted edit

 
Southgate Shopping Centre (Australia), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate Non-admin closure edit

Don't close AfDs in which you participated and have a conflict of interest, especially when you created the article under discussion, and especially by leaving misleading closure rationales, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southgate Shopping Centre (Australia). ----Pontificalibus 11:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This your second warning for disruptively closing AfDs, misattributing them as withdrawn by another user and leaving deliberately misleading edit summaries, as you did here. ----Pontificalibus 13:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Recreation of Southgate Shopping Centre (Australia) edit

Hello. I just reverted your recreation of Southgate Shopping Centre (Australia). It was substantially the same article the was redirected per editor consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southgate Shopping Centre (Sylvania). If you have new reliably-sourced information to add, please share it. Otherwise, fighting editor consensus is disruptive. Also, not using an edit summary when overturning an AfD outcome is also troubling. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023 edit

  Your edit to Whale Beach, New South Wales has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Northern Beaches Council has a copyright notice on their website: "The contents of this website are copyright and may not be reproduced in any form without the prior consent of Northern Beaches Council." Trikekus (:3) 03:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rowen's Arcade for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rowen's Arcade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowen's Arcade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dfadden (talk) 12:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply