Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 291

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 285 ← Archive 289 Archive 290 Archive 291 Archive 292 Archive 293 → Archive 295

Draft:Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline

I, Heserm, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Heserm (talk) 18:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Logan Grove

I, AutoRX, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AutoRX (talk) 00:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Ethereum Name Service

The Ethereum Name Service is a legitimate service that uses the Ethereum blockchain network to convert Ethereum addresses to human-readable names similar to DNS the technology currently exist and is currently being used.[1]. —02:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Ron John (talk)

The G4 deletion isn't valid (no existing AfD debate), but whether it's being actively used or not is irrelevant as far as our notability requirements are concerned. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Although a G4 deletion is not appropriate but A7 would apply. So it's not worth restoring. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  1. ^ https://www.coindesk.com/ethereum-name-service-prepares-take-off/

Steal the Night

I created this article about Cindy Bullens' second album, "Steal the Night", produced by Cindy herself and Mark Doyle that was unknown years ago since 1979 that nobody had before with new information I provided behind that album nobody talked about, so instead of you deleting this article, I suggest you should make improvements to this article, please. Thank you. —88ui7 (talk) 02:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Signed, ~~88ui7~~

  • There is nothing deleted, so nothing to do here, but you may use the talk page or look at the history to see who to talk to about it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Seal-of-the-university-of-bonn.png

The file should be undeleted so it can be transferred to Commons as it is in the public domain (fulfilling commons:Template:PD-Seal-Germany). If it can't be transferred for whatever reason, it should still be undeleted so it can be reinserted into the article University of Bonn. —Mephistolus (talk) 05:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Imelda Akmal

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Captain pooh (talk) 07:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC) i'm reediting this article to be published — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain pooh (talk • contribs) 07:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jerry Keller (politician)

I, 2602:302:D1A2:C740:2DA6:5FA7:3FFF:DC98, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:302:D1A2:C740:2DA6:5FA7:3FFF:DC98 (talk) 17:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Julia Mora

I strongly believe that the Julia Mora article met Wikipedia criteria of a celebrity. (Celebrity refers to the fame and public attention accorded by the mass media to individuals or groups or, occasionally, animals, but is usually applied to the persons or groups of people (celebrity couples, families, etc.) themselves who receive such a status of fame and attention. Celebrity status is often associated with wealth (commonly referred to as fame and fortune), while fame often provides opportunities to earn revenue.

Successful careers in sports and entertainment are commonly associated with celebrity status,[1][2] while political leaders often become celebrities. People may also become celebrities due to media attention on their lifestyle, wealth, or controversial actions, or for their connection to a famous person.and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2600:8801:2B00:CE0:38CC:B27C:6292:C435 (talk) 04:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Julia Mora is indeed a well known tv personality (as described by The National Enquirer" in 2008 and 2017), She meets the criteria also by a connection with Hollywood actor, Erik Estrada. And her claim to fame initiated when she participated in the Miss Universe contest in 1985. I think that the Julia Mora article was deleted too soon. The discussion lasted less than one week and it has strong petitions for keeping. Please, undelete the article. Links and strong sources were submitted and deleted by someone that obviously wanted the article deleted, because he/she had been vandalizing it for years. Thank you

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. You clearly have not read WP:Notability, WP:Notability (people), WP:Articles for deletion, or WP:Identifying reliable sources, or you would know that (1) we don't cite scandal rags like the National Enquirer, (2) "notability-by-osmosis" is not considered notability at all, and (3) the AfD was canvassed off-site, and AfD closers are allowed to disregard !votes that make no rational policy-based argument or are evidently being recruited from off-site in an effort to save the article. Even if all of that was abided by, the debate closed as redirect as opposed to delete; the entire history of the previous article remains in the history so even if there wasn't an AfD there would still be nothing that can be done on this page because there is nothing to undelete in the first place. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Russell Pedley

I, Vitruvianman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vitruvianman (talk) 09:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)

Romano Crivici composer

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Carlatha (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC) The additions all have correct citations. The reference to the biography on the Australian music centre site was written by carlatha at the request of Romano Crivici himself. He is sitting beside me as I write this undeletion request. Please let me know what more I need to provide to you. I can instead provide a reference to Romano Crivici’s website instead if this is more acceptable. Both biographies on his website and on the Australian music centre were written by me ie carlatha.

  •   Not done See WP:IOWN for what needs to be done to demonstrate that you have permission from the copyright owner to post text. Just saying that you have permission isn't enough, we have no way of knowing whether you're telling the truth. Hut 8.5 16:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Zachary Scott Ross

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Zackross7 (talk) 19:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC) Zachary Scott Ross "ZACK ROSS" is a well-known professor, international businessman, and international psychologist who heads the ZACK ROSS FOUNDATION (A global philanthropic foundation), and ZACK ROSS INTERNATIONAL (A private equity and luxury real estate company). He also is a candidate for 2018 United States Congress (District 1). Sources: http://voyagechicago.com/interview/meet-zack-ross-dylan-domanico-zack-ross-foundation-loop/

(Non-administrator comment) Requestor's talk page also includes links to Zachary ross (speedied twice), Zack Ross (speedied thrice and salted in 2011), ZACK ROSS FOUNDATION (A7 speedied today) and his own user page (G11/U5 speedied today). --Finngall talk 20:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Government High School,Remta

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Connectnext321 (talk) 08:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done @Connectnext321: please add some prose text to the page and some links to reliable sources to verify the article's contents, the article is likely to be deleted if you don't do this. Also ping User:John from Idegon who tried to nominate this for deletion before. Hut 8.5 16:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
I nominated it for deletion due to the issues you mentioned, Hut 8.5. My reasoning is it is better to leave the title without an article than to have it tied up in a non article like it was. I would suggest that Connectnext321 leave it in user space. I'd have preferred leaving the title vacant and let him take it through AfC. But it was your decision and you made it, so what can we do now? John from Idegon (talk) 21:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Actually, both of you...I am going to boldly move the title to Draft. That's what we have draftspace for, ya? I absolutely do not understand why an empty article would be restored to mainspace, especially since it is still essentially empty 5 hours later. There was never any substantial content and I think we need something more than an infobox before it should be in mainspace. John from Idegon (talk) 21:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Drone Detector

This is not an advertisement as claimed by the deleting administrator it is a legitimate entry about the company and the main product in an emerging industry. Saying "Drone Detector" (a registered trademark) is an ad is tantamount to saying "Kleenex" [1] is an ad. Please review and undelete if you concur. —2601:2C1:8600:1BC3:4815:6B32:96E4:ED21 (talk) 19:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Nine point nine nine times out of ten any newer user or anon claiming an article about a company is "a legitimate entry" is defending what they know is a blatant SEO attempt. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:09, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleenex
Another indicator of promotional intent, is an obsession with the fact that the subject has obtained a trademark. It is possible that an actual impartial article could be written about this firm; but the deleted content was not that article. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Akhil Talreja

Akhil Talreja is a notable DJ and the content of the article is properly sourced. This article should not be deleted. —103.203.231.174 (talk) 06:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Kuruvi poster.jpg

Restore legitimate image that was properly uploaded by me, complying with WP:FUR. The one uploaded by the now inactive user has been removed from the article, and the user is unlikely to return anytime soon. —Kailash29792 (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

The Addams Family (upcoming film)

I want to revive this article as a redirect page, and I also want to use the content that I had put on the deleted article on my upcoming draft page of the same name. The article was deleted because it wasn't through with production yet, and I want to revive this as a redirect page until some time when the film comes closer towards its release date that I can then integrate the draft into the redirect page and make it into an article. Superchunk22 (talk) 03:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Corey Maison

DGG (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) speedily deleted the article under A7 at 00:05 on 2 January 2018 (UTC). Please userfy the last version of the page that I edited to user:fourthords/Corey Maison. —— fourthords | =Λ= | 16:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
  Note: While the deletion was in error because I had previously declined the A7 request for good reasons, you need to contact him directly for a restore. Regards SoWhy 16:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
the part that didn't need revdel for copyvio was restored to the user space as requested. DGG ( talk ) 23
26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Sarita Raghuvanshi

Hello. Article of Sarita Raghuvanshi had been deleted. It was up from several months. No prior notification/clarification was seeked. It mentions 'unambiguous advertising' as the reason, but there was no such content and all the content on her article is verifiable by media links. Still if there is any content that you may find promotional, kindly edit it and restore the page. Thanks! —Anand.bhate1 (talk) 13:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Randykitty (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Botmetric

Need to update the content —SakshiGaurav (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Fish and karate (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

File:What I Can Do For You 1995.jpg

I would like to reuse this image at What I Can Do for You and then replace the other image. The 1995 re-release was more successful on the UK Singles Chart than the original release. —George Ho (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

OnBuy

OnBuy.com is the fastest growing UK marketplace, with national ITV TV coverage twice in 2017, and planned more for 2018, 10,000 hits per day and 11,000 most popular website in the UK (Alexa) and growing. Furthermore, BBC national news twice, with one planned for Jan 2018, already recorded and post production. Deleting was unfair and the site is very notable. —UKBizMan (talk) 09:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OnBuy, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Co-operative Socialism

(no text provided) John courtneidge (talk) 12:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

César Baena

César Baena is a well know Nordic Skier. The first Southamerican Nordic Skier in the World Cup. Guinness World Record for the longest journey on rollerskis. Many information available in Google that afirmates all this. —Euroski (talk) 14:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Shia Channel

My page was deleted for proposed deletion, please restore it. —103.196.78.121 (talk) 19:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shia Channel, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 19:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Robert C. Jackson

I, Jpopxfg, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jpopxfg (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Wu Yongning

move to my user space —Jax 0677 (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC) --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Can do, standby one. A Traintalk 21:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  Done Now live at User:Jax 0677/Wu Yongning. A Traintalk 21:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:UnderSecretary-General of the United Nations

This talk page was mistakenly deleted. It should instead be moved back to Talk:Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations to match the article. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mg beatz

The draft was recreated 2 weeks after it was deleted per WP:G13. Since the deletion was only a G13 deletion, the deleted revisions for the draft can and should be restored. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

File:C Moon by Wings pink label UK vinyl.jpg

The text is too factual for US copyright. Nevertheless, I'm unsure about UK copyright; UK originality threshold is very low, yet copyright of unoriginal typographic works lasts 25 years. The previous versions of the file should be undeleted, so I can revert back to its original, bigger size. —George Ho (talk) 02:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  Done I don't agree that it is too "factual" for copyright to apply, so that it is public domain. However I have reverted to the older version, as there was excessive reduction. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Creating Draft:BFFs (film)

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) JoannaG31 (talk) 01:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Abel Sánchez

I, Jaredzimmerman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jared Zimmerman (talk) 08:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Template:Chennai Super Kings Roster

The template was deleted last year as the team was inactive for two seasons. The team is back now and the template will be used in three articles: 1, 2 and 3. —Dee03 15:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

The X-Plan Group

Good morning, This article was marked for speedy deletion by Bishonen on 12/30 for promotional reasons. I have accepted the suggested changes of my user name (new username: Diego Antolini) in order to meet Wikipedia's criteria, so I would like to have the draft restored in order to make the necessary changes into the article to meet the Wikipedia criteria. I understand that the article was not yet reviewed by Wikipedia administrators as it was only in the form of a draft and I hadn't submitted it for review at the time of the block. I have spent hours in uploading the material and wouldn't want to have to start the article from zero. I hope you can accommodate my request. Thanks. Diego Antolini —Diego Antolini (talk) 07:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

@Diego Antolini: I can e-mail the content to you, but I don't think this organization meets our notability guideline for organizations at all. Unless if you can provide some reliable secondary sources, I am inclined to reject this request. Alex Shih (talk) 08:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Good morning Alex, The X-Plan Group has written in 5 national magazines (with 2 of them, NEXUS and PUNTO ZERO, the collaboration is ongoing), has been mentioned in several newspapers's articles in Italy, has been mentioned by one article in Argentina, has been hosted in a series of 9 Radio Interviews in Central Italy, and has been invited to talk at International Conferences such as the San Marino Symposium of Ufology. The Group has worked as Regional Representative for the C.U.N. (National Ufology Center) for 5 years, has published two books in Italy (one under my name and one under the name of the three founders), and contributed with an article in two more books in Italy. The X-Plan Group will be mention in a book authored by an Italian photographer living in London for its contribution to the study and research in the "fringe" sciences. Would this be sufficient to meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines? Of course I can provide links to all of the above if it can help, but please advise whether I can post the links here or just finis my final draft of the page with all reference and submit to you administrators for final review. Thanks a lot for helping me, I strongly believe TXP can be a valid contribution to the Wikipedia Project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diego Antolini (talk • contribs) 15:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

No. We don't cite anything the subject has written/said, anything that has been put out on the subject's behalf, quotables, name-drops, or proxies of the subject. Everything you describe above falls into one of those categories. We also do not accept "notability-by-osmosis". You need to show that the X-Plan Group has been written about in some depth by multiple third-party sources that have no connection, direct or indirect, to the subject. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Alan Gandy

I, Codfillets, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Codfillets (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Mr Gandy has achieved more since the article was originally declined. Any reconsideration so that it can be expanded upon would be appreciated.

Regards

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:38, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Mhairi Threlfall

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Gogaria2 (talk) 19:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. The article is likely to be deleted again unless you add more evidence of the notability of the subject. Hut 8.5 11:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

manish om singhania

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abhiwebby (talk) 15:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (TonyBallioni (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
  • They have already contacted me. I will not be restoring as a draft because it would immediately be G11 eligible again. I have offered to email them the text if they want, but if they just post it again without changed it will be eligible for deletion in any namespace. It really needs a complete rewrite. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:DACH

I, Tcs75, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tcs75 (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 23:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

User:Qfennessy/sandbox/Fancy Canadian (cocktail)

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Quentin Fennessy (talk) 19:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC) sandbox/Fancy Canadian (cocktail)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 23:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Lynn Johnson (makeup artist)

The deletion rationale given was G8; however, this never applied, because the parent page did exist. Not only that, but the talk page also had an archived requested move that I closed. All in all, I think this is a huge TROUT for the deleting administrator. —ToThAc (talk) 23:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

An Astronaut's Prayer

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 68.191.115.134 (talk) 20:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This page has absolutely no chance of being accepted as long as it only consists of the text of a prayer, FWIW. Hut 8.5 23:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Black Colossus WT.jpg

Deleted after another copy was uploaded to Commons. However, the Commons copy has now been deleted as nonfree, so this copy should be reinstated. —The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC) The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Mid-impact Wikipedia essays

Now that Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews is considered to be of Mid-impact by the WikiProject Essays —RekishiEJ (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done @RekishiEJ: that page still isn't showing up in the category, you might need to make some changes to the project template. Hut 8.5 15:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

ioana mihalache

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Mihalache1990 (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC) I am ioana mihalache, a model, actress, beauty queen from Romania and I won Miss Universe Romania 2017 on 1st November, after I won this competition in my country I saw that I have a Wikipedia page on my name and everything that was there was proven with link and articles. On 3rd January my page disappeared and I followed all the steps to get it back. Now I am sending a message here and hopefully I will have this issue resolve. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihalache1990 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page appears to have been deleted under speedy deletion criterion G5, indicating a page that was created by a sockpuppet account created to evade a block or ban, or a user editing on behalf of the blocked/banned user. G5 speedy deletions will not be overturned here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:High-impact Wikipedia essays

The same as the argument I made for the request for undeletion of Category:Mid-impact Wikipedia essays —RekishiEJ (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done Again there appears to be something preventing pages from showing up in the categories, I suggest you have a look. Hut 8.5 18:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Rich Manley

The article was deleted due to inactivity and inadequate changes. The stagnant period was due to a change in publicist duties, however, the page for the actor Rich Manley is back on track and ready for updates with continued activity in the entertainment industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abeseth (talk • contribs) 17:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

  Not done for now. @Abeseth:
Concerning the main space article. The article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion. We don't overturn deletions that were deleted via a discussion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Manley) unless new information has come to light.
Concerning the AFC draft: We also don't restore articles at the request of undisclosed paid editors. See WP:PAID and comply with it before you try anything else on Wikipedia, then let me know when you have done that, or post a new request here. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Evotec

Request restoration as draft, believe this subject should be notable —Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Rebtel logo.jpg

The previous versions should be undeleted; the logo is ineligible for Swedish and US copyright. —George Ho (talk) 10:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

periodontitis

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Tdebouches (talk) 17:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC) microscopy is a reality of this disease and references are from 100 years. Can we leave it there? Mark Bonner dmd for Tdebouches

  • @Tdebouches: this page has never been deleted. It looks like you added some content to the page and somebody else removed it. You'll need to discuss the content at Talk:Periodontitis to reach a consensus with other people about whether the article should have this material (see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution). This page is only for when an entire article has been deleted, not just some content within an article. Hut 8.5 17:18, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

bitglass

Hello

please restore this company page.

original page was created as a placeholder with little content and no references over a year ago and deleted within a week.

updated page has content, links in and out, as well as external references from press, patent citations etc. thank you Bnkausik (talk) 04:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC) —Bnkausik (talk) 04:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done This article was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4 (recreation of pages deleted through a deletion discussion), and as such isn't eligible for restoration through this process. I suggest you contact the deleting admin (User:RHaworth) and if you're not satisfied with the response then go to deletion review. Hut 8.5 17:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Sunny Dhiman

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Virendrasingh.jnu (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

|2= Sunny Dhiman, the page that I was creating belongs to a student leader who is also leading face of Indian National Congress parties' student wing, National Students' Union of India.In my previous communication with wikipedia, I have stated the relevance of sunny dhiman. He was part of JNU student group including Kanhaiya Kumar. please reconsider my appeal.

  •   Not done This article was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4 (recreation of pages deleted through a deletion discussion), and as such isn't eligible for restoration through this process. I suggest you contact the deleting admin (User:DGG) and if you're not satisfied with the response then go to deletion review. Hut 8.5 17:33, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Virendrasingh.jnu: The original deletion ws here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunny Dhiman. I have re-checked, and newer version I deleted did not meet the objections raised at the AfD. I point our that though both articles called him a "leader" and you say he's the public face, according to the material provided he lost the election for the presidency of the student organization. I'm not at all sure we could justify an article even if he were the President of it--seethe afd--but I don;t see the point of even trying when he didn't. DGG ( talk ) 18:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Ngagyur Rigzod Editorial Committee

This is an editorial branch of the Ngagyur Nyingma Institute Namdroling Monastery. —Ngawanglsherpa (talk) 06:57, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Are you the same person as User:SharpaWiki who wrote and blanked the page, triggering deletion? Prior to this it was tagged for deletion with A7. Perhaps the "content" could be merged with Namdroling Monastery. What do you think? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Ali Alsalim

Iraqi singer and songwriter. I added more than six sources What is the purpose of deleting the article? —IamIRAQI (talk) 18:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Khaled Alhnen

Iraqi singer and songwriter.No need to delete such articles! —IamIRAQI (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Frank Calderoni

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Andreag4567 (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:27, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Chloe Borthwick

Chloe Borthwick Website 21:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Connieiswright (talk • contribs)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 22:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Tehreek e Islami

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —221.120.224.183 (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC) Tehreek e Islami is an islamic revolutionary religious and political party of Pakistan[1].It was founded by famouse religious scholar MaulanaNaeem Siddiqui and his fellows in 1994[2].Its head office is in Karachi[3].

References

  1. ^ Hafiz Ur Rahman Ahsan and others,Rodad e Tehreek e Islami,vol-I,Shoba e Nashr wo Esha'at tehreek e islami,Attawa society karachi,2010,p2-10
  2. ^ Ibid,p5
  3. ^ Dr.Abdulla Hashmi, Naeem Siddiqui ke Ilmi wa Adabi Khidmat (Urdu), Matboo'aat-e-Suleimani, Lahore 2011, p.21, p.34, p.35

Mark John McEncroe

Page was deleted suddenly without warning or discussion with no opportunity to revise the page. Reason for deletion G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: —Kazbah99 (talk) 00:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Athaenara (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences.
@Athaenara: Your deletion rationale points to three user talk pages with absolutely no information on the page in question as "see also" pages; was this intentional or an autofill blunder? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Usually (but not always) what's pertinent is self-evident on user talk pages which I link in deletion summaries. In this case, it's not, but can be found in those users' deleted contributions which are visible only to those with the requisite administrator permissions.
Users Suzo oz (talk · contribs) and Kazbah99 (talk · contribs) wrote most of the page. User Pianolover46 (talk · contribs) added an external link to his/her website; that user's talk page has several messages about what we on wikipedia call link-spamming.
I won't go on the warpath after anyone who restores it and/or puts it in draft space for de-spamming, but I won't play handmaiden to such an effort either. – Athaenara ✉ 13:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I see. I think pointing to their userpages and leaving a note to look at their deleted contributions in the deletion notice would have made things a little clearer than just pointing to the talk pages. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
You know what would be cool? a shortcut with many fewer characters than [[Special:DeletedContributions/Username]], so a comment like "[[Delcon/user1]] and [[Delcon/user2]] wrote it, [[Delcon/user3]] linkspammed it" would fit in the deletion summary field. – Athaenara ✉ 22:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, it's unlikely the community would ever accept a main space title Delcon. I just tried creating a redirect WP:DELCON with a subpage name transcluded to redirect to Special:DeletedContributions/SUBPAGENAME but it didn't work. Might be able to do it with a template like {{Delcon|username}} but it wouldn't be clickable in edit summaries. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Or a template, e.g. "{{delcon|user1}} and {{delcon|user2}} wrote it, {{delcon|user3}} linkspammed it". I don't know the technical requisites of such things, I'm only capable of imagining a shortcut could exist. – Athaenara ✉ 00:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Templates don't function in summaries. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Or [[Special:Delcon/user]]. – Athaenara ✉ 00:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
A difference of 13 characters matters that much? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Considering the limited space in block/edit summaries and the fact that the deletion rationale pointed to three different users, 13 characters/name would have made a significant difference between a viable summary and one that was cut-off. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:09, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:3CX

I, Chrystalla3CX, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chrystalla3CX (talk) 13:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC) 3Cx is a well established company and we are still working on having the article approved. Our last draft, in our opinion, did not include promotional material but we are working on the contact to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. We would like to continue with this. —Chrystalla3CX (talk) 13:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

  • I will note, however, that it is very difficult for companies to pass WP:NCORP - it's actually quite common for even million or billion dollar companies to fail because they haven't received coverage in the right media outlets. Part of the reason for this is that there are a lot of media outlets that will allow companies to purchase articles to be written about them or will just reprint press releases - these are seen as primary or unreliable sources, generally. Also be careful of industry awards, as very few of them are considered to be notable on Wikipedia. Generally speaking, if the award itself doesn't have an article on Wikipedia, it's unlikely to be notable. Sometimes an award can be notable if the organization presenting it is extremely notable, but even then there are very specific things to be careful about. (IE, like an organization awarding its own members) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Umer Jubapu

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 202.153.40.154 (talk) 09:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Baron & Budd asbestos memo

I am researching the case of the so-called Asbestos cheat sheet and am interested in the seeing the deleted article for research purposes only. I am also looking into the talk page and the changelog to see if an edit war took place over the content in the past years. Again, this is for research purposes only. —Wikigenstein (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC) --Wikigenstein (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Do you have an email address associated with the account? If so, I think one of the admins would be able to email you the last known revision. (The article won't be unilaterally restored because of WP:Articles for deletion/Baron & Budd asbestos memo, but I would not be surprised if an admin emailed you the contents prior to deletion.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
@Jéské Couriano: I do, will they be able to email me the talk page as well? --Wikigenstein (talk) 08:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
@Wikigenstein: you can always go to Deletionpedia to read articles that have been deleted from Wikipedia. In this case http://deletionpedia.org/en/Baron_%26_Budd_asbestos_memo is the article you're looking for. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks @Anachronist:! That's a good start but I also want the talk page and generally, want to understand where deleted pages can be accessed --Wikigenstein (talk) 08:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
@Wikigenstein: there wasn't much on the talk page to be honest - only one comment left by a human (who thought the page was promotional). I'll email you a copy if you want though. Hut 8.5 21:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
@Hut 8.5: sure, that would be great. Is the history log as uninteresting? --Wikigenstein (talk) 10:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
I've sent it to you in an email (along with the talk page). Hut 8.5 18:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Jonathan S. Wolfson

I am Jonathan S. Wolfson and would like to maintain my wikipedia page. I was planning on making edits to the page to update some of my biographical information and noticed it was deleted. I read the deletion criteria and I am not sure why the article was deleted in the first place —67.188.156.102 (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. In general, we consider writing autobiographical material unacceptable as a form of conflicted editing. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_291&oldid=1138479742"