| userpage | talk | dashboard | rfa | contribs | subpages | freqtemps | afd/o | archive |
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
Administrative backlog
AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
User-reported
- 2600:1700:1CA0:6800:D4F3:2DD9:7EBB:E861 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. -- Alex_21 TALK 03:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: 2600:1700:1CA0:6800:0:0:0:0/64 is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 04:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- While an actual warning would have been nice, it looks like the underlying /64 has a regular habit of making exclusively these types of edits over months, albeit infrequently enough and under different ips that they might not even get warnings reliably anyway. For now I blocked the range in Talk for 72 hours to see if it helps any; it could probably go for more. --slakr\ talk / 04:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:182:67f:b060:6414:9cf6:d46b:c872 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Block invader. M S Hassan (talk) 15:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 2 |
| Empty articles | 1 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 10 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 2 |
| Other candidates | 6 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 19 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- SPAMMANER (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "spam" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- DaKidOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Pizzermeep (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "Used z instead of s attempting to skip filter: piss. Violating string: pissermeep" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Stupiddevin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "stupid" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ercsprivatelimited (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Basti hater (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Naronobot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "bot ?[0-9]*$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Name may imply an unauthorized bot. Do not block accounts in which the "bot" suffix arises naturally -- DQB (owner / report) 13:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Red Phoenix talk 14:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- PricklyCactus99 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Centerforchangeks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Divine Public School Kollam (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- ClarissaBianchiRealOnlyfans (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Ternera (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- BaldiBasicsOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. ~Liancetalk 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- No edits at all. Secretlondon (talk) 16:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. Secretlondon (talk) 17:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ftc18225 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Username implying shared use. Melmann 20:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- AAU Wiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:ORGNAME, promotional/copyvio userpage. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Centerforchangeks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:ORGNAME, promotional content on user talk page. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ashland Poetry (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See the userpage. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- CLCStaff (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. See https://www.lascruces.gov/1824/CLC-TV Johnj1995 (talk) 20:52, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Lamachicagohq (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Simcraft.com (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Onorem (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Niarproduction (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See the sandbox. Ruy (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 22:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 04:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous additions of the same unsourced information despite prior warnings to the IPs adding the information. One IP has previous block. CNMall41 (talk) 04:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced additions of character surnames by IPs are back after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 06:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism and probable WP:SOCK edits, removing content repeatedly, particularly a contentious subject in relation to 2023 Manipur ethnic violence. The user was warned, but same edits are being repeated from various IP addresses. Request extended page protection. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 08:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeat hijacking from socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Japansonglove. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 08:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A page related to the I-P conflict need to be ECP. Currently, IPs edit warren to remove sourced information Kentucky Rain24 (talk) 11:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 12:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of reversions recently, especially from brand new editors. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 13:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hopping IP continued addition of death template to an article subjuct who is not dead, maybe a /64 block. - FlightTime (open channel) 13:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR) Hoben7599 (talk) 13:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR) Hoben7599 (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Collaboration with Russia during the Russian invasion of Ukraine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:GS/RUSUKR) Hoben7599 (talk) 13:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated lead disruption by IPs, unlikely to abate anytime soon. A long-term semi is needed. Gotitbro (talk) 14:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content & unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Complex/Rational 18:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Very high vandalisms. Also a very high visible page. please increase the protection indefinite. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 15:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent WP:FORUM violations by IP. Borgenland (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page is targeted by cross-wiki abuse (ja:WP:VIP#ドッジボール関連). Sakura Torch (talk) 15:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page is targeted by cross-wiki abuse (ja:WP:VIP#ドッジボール関連). Sakura Torch (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)fixed.Sakura Torch (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page is targeted by cross-wiki abuse (ja:WP:VIP#ドッジボール関連). Sakura Torch (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page is targeted by cross-wiki abuse (ja:WP:VIP#ドッジボール関連). Sakura Torch (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Requesting indefinite protection per arbitration enforcement (WP:CTOP). Nori2001 (talk) 17:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is a persistent effort to WP:AHIJACK this page. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: frequent unconstructive editing by new and ip editors over the past hour or so GeorgeMemulous (talk) 19:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP disruption. Previous semi expired in February. VQuakr (talk) 19:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's lock this up before we need multiple blocks. Moxy🍁 19:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several recent IP vandals. Wburrow (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP address doing editing test. Jaden7667 (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: The protection is not needed as the disruptive edits by unnecessarily reverting are done by an extended confirmed user. The disruptive edits(reverting) are [1] [2] [3]. These constant and complete revertings of contributions done by multiple users prevents the improvements done to the page. That particular user is alerted in the talk page of the article and hasn't yet provided evidence to his claims. Not blanket page protection but page protection from this particular user is the one needed. അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's not an argument for unprotection, given the BLP issues FrancisSobieski123 (talk · contribs) introduced right before the ECP. If anything, that's an argument to escalate it to full-protection until a discussion has actually run its course. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Reverting contributions of multiple users citing an unreliability of a citation added by one user is injustice. Already the article lacks Neutral point of View(under the section Pastoral ministry and sub section love and narcotics jihad controversy ) that too on a living person, the reverting has undid my multiple contributions too, all with reliable sources that was to address this issue. That particular user's blanket reverting has done no improvement to the page. And that user who reverted my contributions hasn't yet provided evidence to his claim in the article's talk page when asked അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- You're still making a case for escalating the protection, not downgrading it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Reverting contributions of multiple users citing an unreliability of a citation added by one user is injustice. Already the article lacks Neutral point of View(under the section Pastoral ministry and sub section love and narcotics jihad controversy ) that too on a living person, the reverting has undid my multiple contributions too, all with reliable sources that was to address this issue. That particular user's blanket reverting has done no improvement to the page. And that user who reverted my contributions hasn't yet provided evidence to his claim in the article's talk page when asked അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: No puedo acceder 38.49.141.10 (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @38.49.141.10. The page is not protected. Or are you referring to something else? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Good morning, I would like to change the logo of the Cdiscount wiki page : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cdiscount. Cdiscount has change its logo this morning. I have the new file that Cdiscount want to be displayed on the wiki page. Could you update it or unlock the page so I can make the change please. Sincerly. Cds nlv (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- The link you've provided is for French Wikipedia. This is the English Wikipedia. We have no control over that. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done as unactionable by English-language Wikipedia administrators. Please request on the equivalent page on the French-language Wikipedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
- Ipscaij (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
@Ryan shell has suggested me to request autopatrolled rights. I'm often creating simple articles about beetles in English (from the groups I'm personally already familiar with or learning about) and later expanding them if the existing resources allow me to do so. This is to allow other people to find this information and pictures more easily (otherwise it's often scattered on the internet and hard to find). I'm requesting autopatroller rights because I create large batches of articles at once, as Ryan mentioned. I only use reliable sources to provide information for Wikipedia Ipscaij (talk) 09:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Xegma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Roastedbeanz1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have written a total of 48 articles, including 6 in the past 2 days, mainly about hip hop artists. My articles usually have little to no issue. I'm requesting for the autopatrolled right to lighten the amount of unreviewed articles. Roasted; (talk), c. 00:07, 19 June 2023 (CDT)
- Chipmunkdavis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
A patroller suggested I apply for this following the creation of Asphendou Cave petroglyphs, probably a decent idea as I have a few articles in the pipeline for the Wikipedia:2024 Developing Countries WikiContest and don't want to add to NPP burden. CMD (talk) 02:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Penitentes (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello—patroller @Aszx5000 suggested I apply for the autopatrolled permission. I've created 35 articles as of this request, most of them on California wildfires, and plan to continue roughly the same pace and pattern of article creation. Thanks! — Penitentes (talk) 18:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- IanTEB (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
A patroller reccomended I apply for this. To be honest, I did not know it existed until now. I've created over 60 articles, which includes four GAs and a few more pending nominations. IanTEB (talk) 20:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
- PadFoot2008 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy and though usually move those articles myself, they sometimes can't be moved due to technical reasons. I have participated in numerous WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008 04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Saqib (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
So I plan on using it to address page move vandalism and for other non-controversial tasks such as WP:RM.— Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wowlastic10 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am enough experienced for this role (as per the terms and conditions) and I will actively contribute to the community. Arigato! Wowlastic10 (talk) 13:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Mass message sender
- TechnoSquirrel69 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hey there, I'm acting as a coordinator of the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest until the end of September. The role will entail sending out a handful of updates to at least 40 users over that period. I haven't previously requested a mass message, but I've read through the information page and will follow it in good faith to the best of my ability. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
- M S Hassan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia articles. I have been an active editor for almost 3 years, with over 16,000 edits. My contributions reflect a solid understanding of Wikipedia's content policies, including verifiability, neutrality, and no original research. I regularly engage in discussions to improve articles. I am committed to ensuring that pending changes are reviewed promptly and accurately. M S Hassan (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done You've been blocked three times in the last 18 months for edit warring, most recently just last month. Based on that, I don't believe you have evidenced familiarity with one of the requirements of criteria no. 4 in the list of criteria for granting of this permission. This is not a terminal decision and you are free to reapply in the future. Chetsford (talk) 20:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 48JCL (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been helping in improving Wikipedia for three years now, and I am familiar with the wikipedia policy on vandalism as well as the main points of NPOV, Verifiability, WP:NOR, and WP:NOT. I'm hoping I can contribute more to Wikipedia by having PCR right. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
- TonyBallioni (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Can someone grant me rollback when they have the chance? Realized I forgot to ask for it after turning in the tools, and while I'm not around that much, when I am I prefer it to Twinkle. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 21:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Informationageuser (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. Requesting rollback rights to more swiftly correct vandalism and other clearly improper edits. I have dealt with a variety of these over time, with demonstrated knowledge of how to warn and/or welcome with specific guidance tailored to the problematic edit in each case. Thank you. Informationageuser (talk) 05:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 152 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 06:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 11:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Skitash (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As someone who constantly reverts disruptive editors and reports vandals to WP:AIV almost daily, I would greatly appreciate access to rollback permissions to facilitate my work. Skitash (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 21:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- I apologize for not consistently warning editors when reverting their edits. This was primarily the case with IP hoppers, as warnings seemed redundant given that IPs keep changing. For instance, instead of warning this IP I believed to be a WP:LOUTSOCK of Derklnin (whom I had already warned), I opted to request protection for the page at WP:RPPI to secure the article against long-term IP vandalism instead. Moving forward, I will make sure to issue a warning for every IP and registered user I revert. Skitash (talk) 22:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Clearfrienda (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I had rollback on trial that expired about a year ago. My request to renew it was denied due to inactivity. I want to to request it again to gain access to WP:UV and WP:HUGGLE. Thanks. C F A 💬 21:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 21:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not done When I declined your previous request, I asked you to spend a month actively patrolling RecentChanges. Upon reviewing your contributions, I found almost no reverts in the interim period. I see you made a handful of reverts today, however I'm specifically looking for experience acquired over time, not during a single day. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. -Fastily 21:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily: I have been patrolling RecentChanges for about a month, not only today. See my undo log. I assumed this would be enough. C F A 💬 22:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please re-read my previous decline, I asked you to patrol consistently and actively. You're reverting vandalism sporadically for a day and then dropping off for weeks at a time. -Fastily 22:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily: I have been patrolling RecentChanges for about a month, not only today. See my undo log. I assumed this would be enough. C F A 💬 22:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Footer
Policies and links