User talk:Kyle1278-2/2009 Archive

Philip DeFranco image

I removed it again. Per WP:NFCC we can only use free images of living people. I just got one for KevJumba by emailing him. If you want to know how to do that, contact me on my talk page. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, you can contact him here. Ask him to send you an email including a photo and the words "I release this image under creative commons attribution 3.0" or "I release this image under the GFDL" or "I release this image into the public domain". Then you upload the image at commons and follow the OTRS instructions at here. User:Cirt checked the OTRS for me, he's pretty quick about it. You may want to explain that our rules require a free image, and that his wikipedia article gets thousands of hits. Here's the text of the email I sent to Kevjumba. You can modify it if you want.

I need you to say in an email reply "I release these images under the GFDL" ,or "I release these images under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported", or "I release these images into the public domain"

So you know, all of these will allow everyone (including wikipedia) the following three rights to your photos. 1) Modification 2) Redistribution 3) Use for any purpose, including commercial purposes.

Sometimes people don't like number 3, so you may want to think about it. I know of someone in Australia who was unhappy after releasing an image of themselves. A travel agency used it in an advertisement, which they didn't like. It's really not that big of a deal, since every picture of a living person on wikipedia is there under the same rules, but I just want to be clear becuase the licenses are irrevocable.

The difference between the three is that the GFDL is for Linux geeks, the creative commons one is the one that some Flickr images come under, and public domain doesn't require a note saying that the image came from you, unlike the first two. I recommend the creative commons one myself, but choose whichever you like.

Good luck. It's kind of a pain in the ass, but once you get the image, no one will ever remove it, which is pretty cool. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 20:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I forgot to say, there are (too) detailed instructions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images and too ask Cirt on his user page to check it after you upload the image. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 20:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Look at my artice.

They said it should be deleted but why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by IceRules (talk • contribs) 22:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

                         --IceRules (talk) 22:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sxephil.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sxephil.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi Kyle,

I'm new to this. I want to state that it was not blatant advertising. I wanted to place it under the wiki news but ended up here. I'm not in any way associated with FIFA or Ticketing for this. I'm just trying to get my hands and feet wet in to the world of wiki. Just wanted to clarify this.

Thanks Ganesh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gvenkat5 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Fort Simpson, Northwest Territories

Just wanted to let you know that if you use {{clear}} like this you get the same effect as the multiple lines. The other advantage is that this does not happen. One of the automatic edits made by Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser is to remove all the empty lines which spoils the page but may not be noticed by the person using it. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 07:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

List of mayors of Edmonton

Thanks for your work on that list. Unfortunately, I've had to remove the image of William Hawrelak, as it was not free and I don't see the image's use there are being compliant with Wikipedia's non-free content policy. If you'd like to further illustrate the article, all of the free images of Edmonton's mayors that I'm aware of can be found in Commons:Category:Mayors of Edmonton. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 18:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Edmontonmillwoodswind.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edmontonmillwoodswind.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. seresin ( ¡? )  01:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Rationale

According to your rationale, that "you have to it needs more than just one soure it needs several. being shown once in one article dose not estsbish it notability", List of Internet phenomena would go from looking like this to looking like this. I've removed all of the phenomena that have either one source, or no sources at all. Only the ones that have "more than just one source" have been kept in this sandbox edit.

Incidentally, many of the ones I removed shared the same source; just like the Mudkip one you removed. Double standards much? You can't have it both ways. Please explain your rationale in regards to my editing to the standards you have set. MelicansMatkin (talk) 01:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

the source you provided is not nearly enough to establish notability it just because the other stuff on the page has one soure listed dose not mean they do not have more the have been discussed and came to the conclusion that they were notable you just added it with out any attempt at a discussion of providing sources just a little mention in a broad article is far from enough to be added. Kyle1278 (talk) 01:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Last I checked there was no policy stating that every edit made to Wikipedia had to be discussed beforehand. There is also no policy that states more than one source is needed for material to eb included. I was bold and added the information because it is clearly an internet phenomena, and proven to be notable thanks to it being discussed by a reputable and reliable source such as Wall Street Journal. The point stands that according to the rationale you provided, the content on the page would be almost halved (from 49 000+ bytes to just over 26 000). There were five or six items that I removed in my demonstrative edit that shared one source as their only verification; clearly none of those would have been given much more discussion than the WSJ mnetion did. MelicansMatkin (talk) 01:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Read the top of the talk page on there the policy's is a bit different and the article you supplied does not fit that policy Google hits and popular on the internet dose not make it notable the one source you provided is not enough if you can find more and talk about it on the talk page then sure it can go up but in till then it can not. Kyle1278 (talk) 02:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

What? The Wall Street Journal isn't just a throwaway Google source. It's an international daily newspaper with a readership graeter than 2 million. How can the Wall Street Journal possibly be seen as unnotable? I'm genuinely confused about that. MelicansMatkin (talk) 02:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I never said that the Wall Street Journal is not reliable it the size of the article in it dose not pass as notability if you look at other links in the article the whole source is about the phenomena not like yours where its also about 4chan and other things and if you notice on the talk page it says reliable sources it mean there needs to be more than one. I'am not doing this to just target you i'm just trying to keep the article notable. Kyle1278 (talk) 02:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I understand that you're not trying to target me, and I apologize if my posts are giving the impression that I feel that way. I also understand that you're just trying to keep the article as free from crap as possible. But there are still phenomena mentioned that don't have any sources at all. This article is used to source no less than 12 different phenomena in the article, making it similar to the citation I have provided. MelicansMatkin (talk) 02:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• Notability does not govern article content, and is therefore irrelevant here. Verifiability and NPOV are the major concerns for article content, and there are no such problems here. You are at 3RR on this article – do not revert again. Also, please punctuate properly. It facilitates intelligent discussion. seresin ( ¡? )  02:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Being the first person Seresin schooled on Notability, he is correct. Notability only governs the creation of articles, not adding to existent ones. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Cardmaker)} 02:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Cheers Kyle; you've been a good sport with this discussion, and I apologize again if I came across in the wrong way with the way I worded my posts. MelicansMatkin (talk) 02:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

This argument has been discussed before, for example see what seresin says about nine comments down at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_(241-260)/Archive03#.22So_I_herd_u_like_mudkips.22_in_July_9.2C_2008_Wall_Street_Journal.2C_called_a_viral_phenomenon Habanero-tan (talk) 08:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

you deleted my page because and you gave the reason: 'it does not say why it is significant'. i do not see therefore why other band's pages are not deleted, because i used an already existing band's page as a template (no copyrighted material was used). Furthermore, I do not understand fully the purpose of this deletion, because i do not see that significancy is a viable point for speedy deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jworules (talk • contribs) 22:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Subliminal Noise Deletion

My page was put up for 'speedy deletion' by you under article CSD A7. With all due respect, I fail to see how this applies, because I have made myself fully aware of the rules and regulations of wikipedia, and I fail to see also how my page is not significant. If this is the case, and my page is not significant, why are not more band's pages deleted? I fail to see your logic behind your deletion. Sorry to be so blunt, but I truly feel that the suggested deletion was harsh and by the time it took for you to delete it I think (and correct me if I'm wrong) that it would be impossible for you to have read through the article in its entirity. I apologize, as I said, but I do not honestly feel that you are being fair. Please talk back. This is the page in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subliminal_Noise —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jworules (talk • contribs) 22:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, you have said that the band wikipedia page is up for deletion because it is not notable enough. If this is so, you are suggesting that in this massive online encyclopedia with millions of pages that ALL of them are about successful, notable things. Well, there are not that many things that are as notable as you are suggesting, so I do not see how your argument holds up. Jworules (talk) 22:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

possibly, the bebo page is not a viable source. But surely this internet Encyclopedia would count as a viable source? If you would let us set a wikipedia page up, of course. Jworules (talk) 22:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Aren't we pushing for fairplay and manners on this page? Your comment just then contained neither. Maybe the mods on wikipedia could tell you that aswell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jworules (talk • contribs) 22:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

And you are saying that every single page on wikipedia has these sources? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jworules (talk • contribs) 22:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that's exactly what every one of the millions of pages are. But it's free to edit, so people like you add stuff that needs to be deleted. Can you help us out by marking the articles that aren't notable for deletion? Thanks. It's a lot of work. Habanero-tan (talk) 21:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Kyle1278-2. You have new messages at Kelapstick's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey Kyle, looks like someone figured out the solution to your problem, (it's on my talk page), but it will update as soon as you save a change to the page...--kelapstick (talk) 23:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Edmonton

Hi Kyle, I (and probably we) appreciate all the work you've done on the article. However, using scrolling boxes for the ref section is generally frowned upon, as far as I can tell. For one thing, I'm pretty sure it messes up screen readers for blind people. We have at least one blind editor here that I know of and I'm sure many more who come to this site to learn. While I respect your desire to have the article you've worked so hard on look good, this is the encyclopedia for everyone in the world. Everyone.

Also, 150 footnotes is no big news. It's impressive but by no means record-setting. :) The scrollbox has no effect at all on the page-load time. And if you go to GA again with a scrollbox, I pretty much guarantee you will get a plain old NO. Regards & keep up the good work. Franamax (talk) 00:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I understand why you removed it i will not put it back. The reason i put it there is because of the Regina article i have removed it from there but people still but it back. If you could look into this i would be grateful. Kyle1278 (talk) 01:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I see what you mean. I've contacted the other editor on that topic. Accessibility is one of those issues that often gets overlooked.

Also, I've refactored this thread to keep it whole on your own talk page, in accordance with my stated preference. Regards! Franamax (talk) 01:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Maps

I put the other map back. It's gives a clearer picture of where the place is in relationship to the rest of Canada. I also left a message on their talk page. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 23:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

We could sure use a better blank map of Canada which displays the territories. I admit mine was not the best but the infoboxes would look a lot better with a decent blank locator map displaying territory rather than the cluttered colourful one you insist on using. Also in future I would prefer you addressing me directly rather than seemingly telling tales to Cambridge weather, I don't know why you felt as if you couldn't say something to me myself Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC).

Don't worry about. Good work on Nunavut anyway. I had wanted to use File:Canada location map.svg (my intention) but I didn't know the coordinates. Dutch wikipedia however had an even more disgusting looking lurid yellow map with coordinates which if you see I at least tried to improve it, probably to no avail though. I've requested that the svg map is added and coordinates found. If so it should be a good replacement, Cambridge also seems to agree. Regards. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 14:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I was actually asked a few months ago to see if I could request some new maps for Canada. I didn't work out but I swore I'd tried to replace some of the ugly silver ones we have on some of the lower areas like Saskatchewan, Manitoba etc. What would look good I think is if we have a decent regional locator and then a national locator underneath, two lovely clear attractive maps to improve things . My only concern would be that it would lengthen the infoboxes a little but I think it might be a considerable improvement in regards to understanding where these places are. Actually though probably the most difficult maps on wikipedia with pins is America. A lot of the maps are very localised and they shouldn't be really, wikipedia is a global website so it should at least try to help people understand places nationally. I always think a regional and national locator go well together but we'll see how it looks. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I created a few yesterday like Template:Location map Canada Manitoba. These maps show the internal divisions too which helps I think. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I know they aren't perfect as I'm not a "professional" map maker like people like Nord are on here but they are certianly an improvement and look decent enough as a pin now. I would like to get hold of a decent map of Nunavut too, perhaps we could eventually get hold of a nice regional locator map for this region. A lot of people tend to neglect this region which I'm very glad editors like you and Cambridge are dedicated to improving. If you ever have any missing article requests, particularly settlements etc let me know and I'll try to generate a few using a map we agree on of course. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I was thinking of something like the map I created on the right. Major obstacle though is finding the coordinates to make it work. If so I would create a Location map Canada Nunavut asap for us to use. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 17:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Mistake

Oops! My bad! My apologies! --Mhking (talk) 01:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Canada Vatican City Locator.png

Thanks for uploading File:Canada Vatican City Locator.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Canada Benin Locator.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Canada Benin Locator.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^(talk) 22:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violation

I haev deleted the article Canada-Djibouti relations because it was copied from [1]. This website is not public domain but copyrighted, and Wikipedia articles may not consist of copyrighted material. Fram (talk) 16:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I have also deleted a whole bunch of other articles for the same reason. Please don't create any more copyright violating articles. Fram (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

I have Archive granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 16:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Good luck with the new tool, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 16:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

hello there

hello there kyle thankyou for your message, i apologise if i did not fill out box proplerly there seems to be large number of changes from fan who does not want anything on page but promotional info put out by artist, id be grateful for any help not just on this but in general as im always getting lost ...thans again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skinnylizzy (talk • contribs) 18:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I've added {{fact}} tags in pace of the reverted [Citaion needed] markup. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 18:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Who's The Boss

I have a reference if you want it, or i could create a table as in other TV series 217.44.100.48 (talk) 18:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

London

My edits do not appear to be vandalism, please make sure you follow the Wiki guidelines correctly. Those sections are irrelevant and biased.

apologies

i now understand the enormous mistake i made in editing the Conan O'Brien article with false information. as a result i have decided to refrain from further vandalism. furthermore, i will use my expertise in the area of infomercials to contribute more helpful edits to related articles. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.185.15.203 (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism warning?

Er, this appears to suggest the recent edit I made to cake was vandalism that has been reverted. Would that be this recent edit? The one that hasn't been reverted and is a restoration of an article that was blanked except for it's first line? Whats up with that? Huggle gone wrong?--Tangent747 (talk) 20:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Notice of report at WP:ANI

Hello, I noticed you nominated several images uploaded by Einsteinbud (talk · contribs) at WP:FfD. Just thought I'd let you know I have reported this user at WP:AN/I in case you were interested in contributing anything to the discussion. KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

why did you delete my revisions? they were completely legit! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.252.172.82 (talk) 18:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

No Problem

No problem. Cool3 (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Resistance Retribution

According the both my going into GameStop and putting on the link to the site that says its out this friday, Resistance Retribution is yet to be realeased in Europe unlese you meant the demo for which I appologise, but that isn't the case so I don't appologise, I would appreciate it if you would stop lying to Wikipedia and bullying Britsish and Irish teenagers with your biasim, and why not mention Grayson's backstory since yuor so fond of "reliable" links you can go find them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdomkey2 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts Re: Chain of Memories

What the heck have you to do with this, stop stalking me on Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdomkey2 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Did you even create that page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.214.95.136 (talk) 21:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Who do you think you are, only FantasyDragon is allowed to stalk me and edit Wikipedia as he sees fit , no you so STOP TELLING LIES —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdomkey2 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Re

Why have you gave me that message..Please slow down when your reverting or warning someone it was prob a accident but please read what my user page and talk pages says thanks.

Galorr (talk) 01:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Np. Take care

Galorr (talk) 01:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Marlboro HS

Hi, please take care with your Huggle edits, you reverted mine twice, back to the same spot that I had reverted it to in the first place. -- Lucas20 (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Wisconsin's motto

Go on yahoo you'll see an article about the new motto. I'm only trying to be up to date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.118.43 (talk) 02:17, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

wrong name

i am trying fix Tracy Gross which is supposed to be Tracy Grose. I tried to delete the page, but that didn't work. I tried to do a redirect, but that didn't work. And now I am being threatened to be blocked. Any help would be appreciated.

Chris —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tophertopher32 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Hi can ypu please check the edit made from User_talk:131.111.229.18 this user was issued a warning from you as well as my self and i do believe this could be a false positive i am using huggle please let me know thanks.

Regards Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments} 18:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Kyle1278-2. You have new messages at Staffwaterboy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments} 18:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Reply to your comment

That was a vandal box!--Amoebaprotist (talk) 19:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Kyle, I did explain my deletion. I removced an editorial published in long form and added a link. Harold Gilliam wrote a lot of editorials and i figured it was not wikipedia friendly to just cut and paste in one of them Hank Chapot —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.171.135 (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

What was i doing wrong? The last edit made was correct, but i couldn't find a source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.172.98 (talk) 22:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

The source is a video on youtube does this count? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.172.98 (talk) 22:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

You reply extremely quickly. Is this a computer or is this your job to stop things quickly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.172.98 (talk) 22:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

What happened about the Taz river? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.172.98 (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I contest this revert.

Harold Gilliam wrote hundreds of editorials. For someone to cut and paste one of many, probably an opponent of the Fisher Museum in the Presidio, doesn't seem to be good for a wikipedia page unless you want to cut and paste massive quantities of Gilliam's words. I think the link to said editorial was a better answer. Do you even examine changes before reverts or do you just react? Hank chapot (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 68.164.171.135 (talk) 00:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

NEXT, apparently, Kyle1278 is quick on the reverts but not so much on the response. Get your thing in order Hank chapot (talk) 04:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Most of your edits...

And most of your edits have been non-constructive, just reverting me on the basis of an apparent lack of knowledge of what content is acceptable here. For example please see WP:NFC. 141.161.68.46 (talk) 04:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Frankly, after looking this over, I'd remind you to be a bit more careful when reverting. While a few of the prods could have gone either way, that is no reason to revert back to copyrighted material as you did here. Please remember to investigate fully, especially when an IP is likely an established user, as this one seems to be. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 04:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

So in reference to those, I'd like to point out that that was not unconstructive. Take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The US network TV schedule articles. This was almost deleted before, and I've found that it's fairly conventional to prod articles after a no consensus AfD if you think views may have changed and no one will object any more. 141.161.68.46 (talk) 04:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Jesus, I am an established contributor as suggested, away from home right now, so I don't want to log in, but seriously man WP:DONTBITE, take a look at it. 141.161.68.46 (talk) 04:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

After a no consensus AfD, I would actually say that it is always better to go back to AfD, just to make sure that consensus really has changed. Also, I don't believe that either Kyle or I meant offense. Let's just let everything be? NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 04:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

(deindent) It's really all cool, but I'd just like to say that I think we all know we wouldn't be having this conflict if I were signed in. People have a tendency to assume every IP is a vandal.... sad really141.161.68.46 (talk) 04:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete

Looks like someone else got to them first. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 06:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

hi

what's wrong with little can be known?? I think that it is very constructive, in my opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.33.1.148 (talk) 01:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

About "Speedy deletion of Traditional Chinese star names in the Purple Forbidden Enclosure"

Kyle1278 さん、はじめまして。済みません。私の利用者ページの Wikipedia:Babel が "en-1", つまり "I am able to contribute with a basic level of English." なものですから、日本語で失礼します。 標記 "Traditional Chinese star names in the Purple Forbidden Enclosure" の編集についてなのですが、他言語版 (foreign-language Wikipedia pages) から直接 copied and pasted したのがまずかったということでしょうか？ speedy deletion というのは、日本語版の "即時削除" に当たるみたいですね。日本語版では、要約欄に copied and pasted 元のページを明示すれば（つまり履歴の継承をしていれば）copied and pasted した後に翻訳できたかと思います。英語版ではそれもダメということでしょうか？一応、翻訳途中だったのですが（↓このような感じ）：

This is a list of the traditional Chinese star names in the Purple Forbidden Enclosure, Zǐ Wēi Yuán (紫微垣).

Names are arranged into Chnese traditonal constellations.

北極

• 北極一（太子）：γ UMi
• 北極二（帝）：β UMi
• 北極三（庶子）：4 UMi
  • 庶子増一：?
  • 庶子増二：?
  • 庶子増三：?
• 北極四（后宮）：5 UMi
• 北極五（天枢）：32H. Cam

References

• 大崎正次 (1987) 「中国の星座・星名の同定一覧表」 『中国の星座の歴史』 雄山閣出版, pp. 293-341.
• 常福元 (1920) 『中西對照恒星録』 中央観象台

See also

• Categories of Chinese traditional uranography

zh:北天中西星名對照表#紫微垣

再編集するにはどのようにしたら良いのでしょうか？ Wikipedia:Babel "en-1" の分際で出しゃばるなということでしたら、編集は遠慮しますが。--Bay Flam 03:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

えーと、弱ったな。中国語のページを編集したもんだから中国人かと思われてしまったかな？ せっかく、私の talk page で翻訳していただいたのですが、私の user page にありますように「日本語を母語としている」ので、中国語に翻訳されても、英語以上にさっぱりわかりません。誠に申し訳ないのですが、中国語ではなく日本語でお願いいたします。わがままを申し上げて済みません。--Bay Flam 01:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Irfan Yusuf

Please carefully review this page before reverting it without discussion. --121.44.194.116 (talk) 06:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Sports

DO u like hockey? Kyle

                  Jamesran (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)jamesran

Uuhh...

Why was my silly edit reverted, but the sentence I edited remain?86.46.194.177 (talk) 02:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC) Also, it actually was correct, though obviously unneccessay. He realeased a vid on youtube stating this.86.46.194.177 (talk) 02:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC) No. I understand that. What I don't understand is why wikipedia mentions chris at all. I'm pretty sure the original sentence was vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.194.177 (talk) 02:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Knowing Chris, he may well have been the original vandal. His trolls are the ones adding Sonichu to the Jimmy Hill page. Good night sir. 86.46.194.177 (talk) 02:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I am not vadalizing anything!

Just updating a page with more current info! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunter onhikas (talk • contribs) 05:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Its the freaking truth! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunter onhikas (talk • contribs) 05:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I've provided a number of sources using the MLA citation standards for my edits to the article "Serpentine (shape)" only to find that you've objected to the content. Please If you object to the sources I've cited provide some evidence as to why it is 'unreliable'. I highly doubt that you're familiar with the seminal works of mr.'s Kahn and Thompson. Untill you've informed yourself on the subject I object to your automatic refute of my assertions which come replete with proper academic citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.229.179.112 (talk) 19:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Help needed

Hi, what actually is the sandbox and how does it work? I'm a newbie haha thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.168.159.124 (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

bongwarrior edit

i did not vandalize a page i simply stated a known face, which is the purpose of this website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodworthguy (talk • contribs) 02:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Careful

Please be more careful with your vandalism reverts such as this. You put the vandalism right back into the article. either way (talk) 02:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Packham's Squash

Apologies for my reversions of the prod - I misunderstood the procedure (mixing it up with speedy tags). AndrewWTaylor (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Request for blocking a user

Hi. The user 213.190.141.189 already did a vandalism in page Cobh. I was about to give his last warning, but noticed that right in that time you gave him. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know. Thanks. Parvazbato59 (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

okay, now you say i have no sources ever thing else on that page dosen't have a source are racialy profiling me, cause i will report you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pighair47 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Pighair47 (talk) 01:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC) look directly above what i wrote, may i ask where their spelling, grammer, and sources came from i do not recall seeing any. would it help if i posted a picture of the newspaper?

Fox News Channel

Just wanted to thank you for undo-ing the vandalism from User:172.167.75.127 when he replaced the main picture of Fox News Channel with one of the scrotum —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luedhup2 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Apology

I'm sorry about what I've done to your page on Resistance and others, I hope you accept my apology and believe me when I say I wont vandalise anyone else's pages —Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretAgentkingdomkey2 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Ossian, Iowa

I think you may have reverted a legitimate edit at Ossian, Iowa. The first sentence looks legitimate, but the rest of the section is OR/blatantly false. Regards, Jd027 (talk) 19:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

No worries. Best of luck to you, Jd027 (talk) 20:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh Okey Man I Am Sorry but I Read IGN

http://search.ign.com/products?qtype=0&query=Lost+Planet+2&objtName=all&sort=relevance&so=exact&ns=true&genNav=true

Okay ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sercan0053 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

message

This is all true to Chaos Theory; it is all verifiable; you are wrong to delete it. This is new, helpful, and true to fact.[[2]]

'ESV Study Bible' Vandalism

The complete list of contributors on article The ESV Study Bible is hardly encyclopedic. It's also fairly obvious that it was cut-and-pasted from Crossway directly. Not much reason to leave it there. 76.104.249.167 (talk) 00:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed the previous link. 76.104.249.167 (talk) 00:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Thanks

Certainly, my pleasure! - Biruitorul ^Talk 07:17, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

CarsDirect

Hi Kyle, I explained the rationale for the CarsDirect page on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:CarsDirect. LoveWikis (talk) 05:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

No worries. LoveWikis (talk) 18:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Baker Lake

Can you explain a bit more what you mean by it being off. It might be something that you see from a particular computer. Because I can edit at work and home I have access to five different computers and depending on which one I'm using the formatting and/or colours can look very odd. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 12:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

OK. It looked OK at home but I forgot to check on the laptop. It looks OK here at work as well but everything looks a bit big. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 18:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

It's a good idea too bring these things up. I noticed once a table that was sorted by colour but on a particular monitor the differences in colour were so small that you couldn't see them. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 18:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

IM SO SORRY. I WONT DO IT AGAIN. PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGIES. THANKS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chazqudini (talk • contribs) 22:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Talk:Calgary

It looks like you did it correctly. Gary King (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Andrew Martin

The guideline for adding deaths to current year pages is that the minimum requirement is 9 non-English citations (a very poor standard but there seems to be nothing better). The person should also be internationally and historically significant. I.e. they are known outside the activity for which they are famous in countries other than that in which they are based. I can't see that any professional wrestler would meet this standard. DerbyCountyinNZ 22:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher application

Dear Kyle1278,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join #wikimedia-npw.

Valley2city^‽ 01:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC) This is my first time granting anyone NPW so please let me know if it works or not. Thanks, Valley2city^‽ 01:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the assist for Six Days in Fallujah

I was in the middle of correcting the reference links on my part and I didn't notice that you already did it for me. Thank you for being on top of this. It is much appreciated. Dibol (talk) 03:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

==BFM 89.9

A tag has been placed on BFM 89.9, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of BFM 89.9 and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Susan BFM (talk) 03:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC) ==

hi kyle, my apologies - have re-written the entry to make it more encylopediac please advise ifit is still not up to scratch thanks much Susan BFM (talk) 03:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

April

mate why are taking the pizza competition thing down ? its a genuine event, its sponsored by la bella pizza the winner gets 50% its a fun competition we have started at the school, so please stop taking it off. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.134.215.144 (talk) 15:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Crowleys Ridge

You reverted the change I made to Crowleys Ridge and left the note "it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation." What do you call that edit summary?? As clearly explained, I removed broken, no longer working links, most of which were of questionable quality even when they existed. 64.210.231.124 (talk) 16:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Me

I am very new to the rules of wikipedia so if I make a mistake, please do not get too angry because I probably don't even know what wrong I did. But I do my best to contribute.

Osh33m (talk) 17:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

April, 2009

The edits I made to the Dan Cramer page should not be reverted. Someone vandalized the page and I was just fixing it. Justastud15 (talk) 17:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

You said they weren't mine, but they were. That was me, just not signed in to my account. Justastud15 (talk) 03:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

heya

thanks for having my gina rocks out page deleted-not!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginasunshine123 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

hey you big dumb meaner god is what people belive he is. I made the religion that belives that its called juderism. its called freedom of speech. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiwipeel (talk • contribs) 21:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

brolly

in brolly's first movie it is clearly stated he has a power level, at birth, of over 10,000. evertime i add it you remove it. its not a lie. im not vandalizing the page, so why is there a problem with adding it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Largoss (talk • contribs) 02:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

My Lai Massacre edit

Dear Kyle, I am a sophomore in highschool and I'm doing research on Vietnam. I happened to run into the article "My Lai Massacre", and this story seems to contradict the stories of what my mom says. My mom lived in Vietnam at the time. Here is my actual edit that I attempted:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Story from my parents - I asked my mom (who lived in Vietnam during this time period) about the My Lai Massacre (Mee-Ly) and she told me that the Vietcong set up this incident. The Vietcong (Guerilla Communists) "Master-mined this incident" by fighting the Americans dressed up as civilians and "pushing civilians into the line of fire". The American soldiers' motive was understandable. I was also told that the vietnamese wrote a memorable song about this incident telling about the truth.

-Andy, Sophomore in highschool

Would you mind adding this to the article, "My Lai Massacre"? Thanks for your time.

Binto

This was a typo as the entry was supposed to be Bintro. Sorry for the blank deletion. Allmayaillusion (talk) 02:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Elliot Wave Principle --- recent edit

Hello Kyle1278. In reference to the article on "Elliot Wave Principle", there is a section entitled "Criticism". I added a sentence there linking to an essay critiquing the Elliot Wave Principle. The problem was that the essay appears on a blog [orvinfive.blogspot.com], so you deleted it. The blog contains nothing but the critical essay (i.e. its not commercial, etc.) and I'm sure that it's appropriate to the academic discussion of the article. So is there any way to put the reference back, or at least include it in the external links at the end?

Thanks for your consideration Orvin Five —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.120.146.186 (talk) 19:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Elliot Wave Principle - recent edit

Thanks Kyle1278. I put it back by undoing the revision once again. I hope that this was the correct way to do it so that the bot does not catch it again. Thanks for your response. -Orvin Five —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.120.146.186 (talk) 19:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Elliot Wave Principle -- recent edit

Hello again Kyle1278, Guess what? My link to the criticism of Elliot Wave theory that you allowed me to keep in the article has been removed again. This time, it was removed by a user named "Sposer". But Sposer openly discloses on his user page that he is a proponent of Elliot Wave theory. I question how any reasonable debate can be conducted under such circumstances. Just letting you know about it. -Thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.120.146.186 (talk) 04:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

An Invite to join the International Roads WikiProject

- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Highways - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi, Kyle1278-2, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the International Highways WikiProject! The Highways WikiProject is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, road portal and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to International Roads. This includes supporting existing regional road WikiProjects and fostering the development of new WikiProjects.
|As you have shown an interest in 34 Avenue, Edmonton we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! SriMesh | talk 00:43, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Good to have you aboard! I was thinking as I added the invite to you that there should be sometimes be double invites, as there is also the Canadian Roads WP as well.  :-) Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 01:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Cool!!! SriMesh | talk 01:04, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Dude, stop editing what i edit. God Bless —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.178.191.241 (talk) 02:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Deal

Deal, i'll just say 1 line of my opinion. then nobody edits it. fair —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.178.191.241 (talk) 02:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Recent edit to the page Polygamy

This is regarding your message at User talk:75.72.217.46 regarding this edit to the page Polygamy. I am obviously new to editing and while reading the article came across a typo so thought of fixing that. I did not give a detailed description as the fix was self evident but after getting a message from Tiderolls I re-edited and this time I gave a detailed edit description. But now I notice that the page has been reverted and I am given a warning. I would appreciate if you could could look into the page and see for yourself that I was just trying to fix an error. Cheers :) Umnmathtutor (talk) 02:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Please be more careful...

...when reverting. You warned a user per this, but they were adding a talkback on the page. Please review the contents of the edit more thoroughly next time. Thanks, — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 01:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Yea and I wanted it reverted as it turns out. But you probably shouldn't have warned him. Prodego ^talk 01:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

(edit conflict) It is fine. :) — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 01:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

A bit bizarre...

Why on Earth did you revert an edit I made to Prodego's talk page and slap a warning on mine? Not that it matters, since Prodego himself reverted your edit to my talk page seconds later. Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs 01:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Uh, he's already apologised... — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 01:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Mostly because I was actively reverting your edits to my talk page. I am watching your talk page, you don't need to tell me that you responded. He should not have warned you though. Prodego ^talk 01:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I can't get a word in edgeways here with all of the (edit conflict)'s.. lol.. to clear something up, I added that section before the previous one appeared.

Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs 01:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Something sparkly!

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		On behalf of articles that need help keeping themselves clean and fresh, and all in order. I hereby award you this sparkly barnstar for helping articles be their best. Your diligence is under appreciated but your work has not gone unnoticed. Keep helping our articles in need and thank you so much for helping provide a free encyclopedia to the world! -- Banjeboi 01:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Stop

why are you having the gina williams page deleted im a real person-actress —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginasunshine123 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Ooh...a Barnstar!

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	For working hard and spending your time reverting vandalism, messaging users, and helping improve pages by adding templates, I award you this shiny barnstar. Your work does not go unappreciated. Thanks for making Wikipedia a better place for everyone! SuperHamster (My Talk) (My Contributions) 02:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Rugby001.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Rugby001.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Castrol raceway header.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Castrol raceway header.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:52, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Eacedmnonton logo.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Eacedmnonton logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Got 'em - thanks. :) Skier Dude (talk) 02:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello, my name is Daniel Vintimilla. Sorry for editing that page, but how do I create my own page to inform and educate people about my exploits? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.202.147.212 (talk) 21:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

McDougall United Church

Isn't a Methodist church it's a United Church of Canada church, hence the name. The main methodist church is Canada merged in the United Church in the 1920s. McDougall was built by methodists but is now United. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Edmontonalberta RAM RF.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Edmontonalberta RAM RF.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much

for the barnstar. Much appreciated. Jalapenos do exist (talk) 22:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Albania-Canada

My apologies; I will try to be more careful in the future. - Biruitorul ^Talk 03:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

demographics data for small communities

I noticed you added some statcan references that don't actually mentioned the small communities at all. Some data was available online at Industries Canada, when they studied the impact of broadband internet in rural areas. You can still find the web archieve at this location (Click-able map, then lists of communities with links to demographics). It would be more accurate to cite those actual numbers. Cheers. --Qyd (talk) 04:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Morteza Motahhari ?!!!

Hi. Well I have no idea how come you have sent such message for me, regarding to vandalism on the mentioned page!! Since I have never ever been on that page. My user name is "Kak_Language" and my contributions through Wikipedia are clear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.38.22.143 (talk) 10:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Drawing Flags for Wikipedia

The best format for flags in Wikipedia is SVG. This is because it captures all the lines and shapes of the flag mathematically allowing others to easly edit and manipulate your work. Inkscape is the best free tool for this, but it take time to learn to draw vector images.--Svgalbertian (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

hello kyle1278 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.65.244.151 (talk) 02:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Alberta-Culture

hey.. with regards to the Calgary Stampede.. I only changed it to say 'the world's largest' simply because it is mentioned in the main article found here Calgary Stampede. I had no direct sources of reference.. so I guess that main article needs editing too?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fish147 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

G10

Hey Kyle, when you tag something as a G10 for speedy deletion, feel free to blank the page. If it is an attack page, then we want to get it off the web as quickly as possible so that Google doesn't find it and wikiclones don't copy it. An admin can easily look up the history to confirm that it was in fact an attack page.---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 22:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Edmonton COA

Hiya. The convention across all coat of arms articles on Wikipedia is to not capitalise 'arms' in the page title. This also follows our MOS, which avoids capitalisation wherever possible. I'm going to have to ask an admin to move the article back where it was. Cheers. //roux   02:05, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

John Wick vlog link

Hi Kyle1278, I reverted your revert with an explanation on the Talk:John Wick page, and then realised I should probably let you know. Please leave a message there if you think there is still a reason to remove it. d<3vid seaward | Talk 00:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiBirthday

I saw from here that it's been exactly one year since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 15:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations Kyle, you have been doing some great work here. Keep it up! --kelapstick (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

And a happy Wiki-anniversary from me too! I'm glad you've stuck around and helped out so many newbies. – Quadell ^(talk) 22:26, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Your speedy deletion requests

Hello. Why did you decide to blank out École/Escuela Grandin Catholic Elementary School and request its deletion? You were not the only contributor to the article, so the speedy deletion criterion you selected was not applicable. There might be other good reasons to delete it, but I can't see what those reasons are. (The same question applies to three other school articles.) --Orlady (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I guessed that might be what was going on. A better way to handle this situation would be to merge some details from these articles (for example, enrollment and special programs offered) into Edmonton Catholic School District (that is, annotate the list of schools with a little bit of information about each school), then redirect the articles to Edmonton Catholic School District. (This is what is typically done after an article about an elementary school is taken to WP:AfD and is determined to lack sufficient notability to have its own article.) --Orlady (talk) 15:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

69 Sexy Things 2 Do Before You Die

Hi Kyle,

Zepolekim here. I tried to edit the 69 Sexy Things 2 Do Before You Die page to make it as straightforward as possible. Can you let me know what else I can do to make it acceptable?

Thanks ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zepolekim (talk • contribs) 21:06, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey Kyle, it turns out there were two articles (I redirected the worse version to the better), but the article was rewritten and is not strictly promotional any more so I removed the speedy tag, you are welcome to prod or AfD.--kelapstick (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

No problem! It was a missing | before the final }, I think. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 19:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

attacking editors

i did not attack an editor, i mearly asked why he thought it was ok for him to vandalize an article i created and deleting it without any notice or reason. he refused to answer. its nioce too see people can just run around freely deleting whatever they want and the victoms being accused of harrassment. what a joke. ebann (talk) 04:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to the Wikiproject!

Hi, and welcome to the Tropical cyclone WikiProject! We are a group of Wikipedia editors who help to improve articles related to tropical cyclones on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here are a few suggestions.

• You can check out topics on the main page.
• You can re-assess tropical cyclone-related articles to assure they are up to standards.
• See the to do list for the WikiProject, and opt to try and complete some of those tasks.
• Check out the guidelines to get an idea of the project's standards.
• If you want to work on an article, Category:Stub-Class Tropical cyclone articles is a great place to start.
• You can also check out the newsletter.
• For further information, you could join the WikiProject Tropical cyclones IRC channel or Discord server.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.

The project may not be as active as it once was, but we still welcome you to the project! (Sorry about the belated welcome, I've been busy.)

Welcome to the Wikiproject!

Hi, and welcome to the Tropical cyclone WikiProject! We are a group of Wikipedia editors who help to improve articles related to tropical cyclones on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here are a few suggestions.

• You can check out topics on the main page.
• You can re-assess tropical cyclone-related articles to assure they are up to standards.
• See the to do list for the WikiProject, and opt to try and complete some of those tasks.
• Check out the guidelines to get an idea of the project's standards.
• If you want to work on an article, Category:Stub-Class Tropical cyclone articles is a great place to start.
• You can also check out the newsletter.
• For further information, you could join the WikiProject Tropical cyclones IRC channel or Discord server.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.

The project may not be as active as it once was, but we still welcome you to the project! (Sorry about the belated welcome, I've been busy.) Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 13:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Kenny Marquez

Hi Kyle,

I may be a little confused, so any information you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Kenny Marquez is the lead guitarist for the 80's Latin Rock Band Renegade. He's notable for a number of reasons. Primarily because Renegade was the first Latin Rock Band. Although Carlos Santana and Richie Valens obviously predate Renegade, Renegade was the first band that was literally playing rock and heavy metal. Many have followed, but Renegade was the first. Plus, the band has sold in excess of 30 million records worldwide, which in and of itself is notable.

I've tried to convey these facts and properly reference them. I'm obviously not done with the article and could easily spend weeks fine tuning it. But, I would appreciate your providing me with enough guidance so I can avoid having the article deleted before I've even had an opportunity to complete it.

Thanks,

Todd —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warriorboy85 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:EPSEdmontonLogo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:EPSEdmontonLogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Sysomos page was deleted although notable. A main source (an entire Toronto Star article about this company) was improperly referenced. As it was my first page, I was in the process of changing this while it was deleted (in about 20 minutes). What next? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aubreypodolsky (talk • contribs) 16:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey Kyle,

I put in Willard Rowland because there is a push by the Republicans to take funding away from PBS. He has been an advocate for more funding

His whole body of work is about television and violence in the media... lots of books.

And when he was getting his PhD he actually coined the phrased Closed Captioning. He has spent 40 years fighting the fight. He deserves more than I can write about him. He brought all kind of children's programming to the forefront.

Well respected and well hated by the establishment because he keeps pushing for PBS to have it's own news service like the BBC that would not be beholden to anyone.

He deserves a page because he has quietly trying to serve those who don't have a voice in the day to day. OTAN (talk) 16:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Naseem Vicky

Hi Kyle, I hope you don't mind but I've removed the speedy tag from Naseem Vicky as I take "one of Pakistan's most popular theatre comedian" as an assertion of importance. Cheers and happy editing ϢereSpielChequers 18:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Tiffany Lynne Rowe

Please let me know if I am more on the right track here in terms of demonstrating notability.

Many thanks in advance.

Dreadarthur (talk) 21:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

...where what I mean is Tiffany Lynn Rowe...

Dreadarthur (talk) 21:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Tennessee Firearms Association

Hey Kyle, well I was going to write and article about this group tonight. Seems notable to the news media and the Governor's office that they've threaten police officers and prosecutors here in Tennessee. You slapped a speedy delete notice on article twice before I had time to enter the second sentence. So, screw it, you write it. Scribner (talk) 04:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Furla article

Why have you deleted my article about the Furla brand. I have some time gathering info and was ready to make some rewrites. Similar articles exist on Wikipedia for many popular brands, including Gucci, Prada, Fendi, even the Guess stores have a page. I think that this brand deserves to be in this encyclopedia. Please, comment. Antonius1981 (talk) 15:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Willard Rowland

So, what exactly do you want when you say references...

He is very controversial in the esoteric communications / public broadcasting world. Is it quotes/research/writings/ books that you want?

I think it is a voice that needs to be heard even if he ruffles the feathers of commercial broadcasters, the cable industry and the satellite companies. And that doesn't even touch the violence in the media research vis a vis the conservative movement that he disproves with his data (violence in the media according to Rowland does not cause violence in society contrary to what Fox Network says...)

Thanks for not deleting yet... I will read about others who are living, breathing... and try to make it a good site.

Thanks, Kyle...It won't be immediately though with the research... there has been some illness in my family. OTAN (talk) 03:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:G alberta.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:G alberta.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Outline of Canadian Provinces

I have noticed that you contribute alot to Canada articles on Wikipedia; particulary Alberta articles. I am requesting your help to join the Outline of Knowledge WikiProject, that I'm sure you know about. We recently have planned to start new outlines for the provinces of Canada and our first province we have started an outline for is British Columbia, if you can help out in any way to these Canadian province outlines (we would love for someone to start the outline of Alberta article) that would be great! Burningview (talk) 20:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Hey I usually use GameSpot and GameFAQs for gaming news and for updating the list. Silver Sonic Shadow (talk) 23:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Response

Thanks for the very kind compliment!, though i don't think it's that great... -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 23:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Al-Rashid Mosque

You might want to take a gander here. Thanks. Keegan^talk 20:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate it, keep up the work. Happy editing to you. Keegan^talk 00:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm glad you're going to fix up the Al-Rashid entry.

Hi, Kyle.

I really hesitated about forcing the issue on the Al-Rashid entry because I feel it is so important to get the information out that there have been vibrant Muslim communities contributing to society in the West, and, of all places, in Western Canada, for so many years. I'm glad to hear that you'll be re-doing it.

Best wishes

anhaga http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/U215480

Realanhaga (talk) 00:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Recent edits using Checklinks tool

Hi Kyle, I've just reverted your recent edit at the Vancouver article. [3] Here are my grounds:

• Your edit summary says "Tagging 3 dead links using Checklinks". In fact, your edit also added the "accessdate=" parameter to several ref's. Did you personally view those links to confirm that they properly support the cited claim in the article? If not, you may be making a false claim of authenticity. For instance, I could make a link to www.poopoo.org/whoopdedoo.htm - as long as I made that page exist on the internet, would you have added the accessdate= parameter, which confirms that you yourself accessed the link?
• Your script also renamed (i.e. consolidated) duplicate references, and this is not reflected in the edit summary. A better practice would be to summarise with "updating ref's and taggind dead links using Checklinks", so that reviewing editors would have a better idea what to expect.
• You added a {{deadlink}} template to a reference which already had an archive link (The Smith & Kennedy source in Affiliated Cities...). This is incorrect. If the archive-link format is incorrect, please fix it rather than apply a tag which could be confusing to our readers.

Looking back to your previous use of Checklinks [4], I'm just wondering - are you familiar with the Wayback Machine? It's really easy, when you find a dead link, you just go to www.archive.org and paste it in. If the machine finds it, for most ref templates you just add the "archiveurl=" and "archivedate=" parameters and 'tis all fixed! I just did that for one of the dead links in the Calgary article. [5]

I appreciate your enthusiasm and I'm not trying to be critical of your efforts, it's just that I myself am always much happier when I fix something as opposed to when I tag something for someone else to fix. Regards! Franamax (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Peter Lougheed

Please do not change information for pages you do not have information on first. Peter Lougheed can be googled, and you will see the image matches. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by --Katari Devi (talk) 22:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Katari Devi (talk • contribs) 21:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay I see what happened here. Yes, Gray Nun's hospital is quite similar to Peter Lougheed, actually exactly the same.

--Katari Devi (talk) 22:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Alberta

Please ensure that you inform the reader that the temperatures are from warmest to coolest. There is no indication. I simply rearranged the data in alphabetical order so that reading through the information is not difficult and so that the data does not look inconsistent.

Thank you,

--Katari Devi (talk) 22:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Thunderstors and the weather

I've lived in Cambridge Bay and Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories since 1974 and I've go used to the weather. In fact when the temperature gets above 20 C I start to feel uncomfortable. We usually get one or two thunderstorms a year. Not very major storms but sometimes they can last for up to an hour. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 21:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Because I was sort of replying to the IP as well I answered you at User talk:CambridgeBayWeather#Hey. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 09:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back

Glad to see you're back again. Have fun. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 00:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Gina rocks out

why did u delte my work u loser don t agin or ther will be trouble —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginasunshine123 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Get lost

I am free to do what ever i want to do on this fine site as it states in The law since our great leader Fred Perry drove us to in the durostiction act so Gina Rocks Out is a famous fashion designer in Milan which you wouldn t know obviuosly —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.151.123 (talk) 08:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your Nunavut climate contributions

You have made some great contribs this week, improving articles that I watch, thanks! BaShildy (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Mark page patrolled

Thanks for the help over at new page patrol. Just a heads up when you mark a page for CSD make sure you mark the page patrolled as well. So the rest of us on new page patrol can ignore the page. Whispering 04:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Removed speedy deletion tag: The word alive

Hi Kyle1278! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on The word alive- because: Asserts significance by being founded by a notable musician If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. decltype (talk) 05:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Weather/Climate Infobox

Can you add one of those weather infoboxes that you added to Gander, Newfoundland and Labrador and Grand Falls-Windsor, Newfoundland and Labrador to Twillingate, Newfoundland and Labrador? It would be a great addition to the article. NeonFire (talk) 01:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

HERGUAN University - derogatory content on wiki pedia

Hello Kyle,

(cur) (prev) 16:39, 18 July 2009 Khemant (talk | contribs) (4,657 bytes) (→Student life) (undo) (cur) (prev) 16:38, 18 July 2009 Khemant (talk | contribs) (4,633 bytes) (→Academics) (undo) (Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism) (cur) (prev) 16:36, 18 July 2009 Khemant (talk | contribs) (5,237 bytes) (→History) (undo) (Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism)

Thank you for removing the content, but again a user named khemanth had entered text which was derogatory and i am working in the university so me and higher management have decided to sue this person. For that we need the ip address of this particular user and any information you can provide. We dont want to leave him room to repeat this act as it causes us lot of damage to our business.

(Godsrikanth (talk) 01:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC))

thank you, Srikanth Goduru Student Affairs/Public Relations Officer, HERGUAN UNIVERSITY. Yahoo Msg id: godsrikanth Gtalk/Gmail: godsrikanth Cell:408-506-7276 Ph: 408-481-9988 ext: 115 Email:srikanth@herguanuniversity.org/ hgu.sri@gmail.com website: www.herguanuniversity.org

File:Canada Mali Locator.png

Thanks for creating the Canada - African country locator maps. Very useful for writing Canada bilateral relations articles. Could you make one for Canada and Mali, please? File:Canada Mali Locator.png —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fm122 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

A question about the speedy deletion nomination re: Piero Amadeo Infante

hi!

My name is Santos and I am archiving material regarding several notable people in the bay area, and I was wondering if you could tell me why the entry "Piero Amedeo Infante" received a speedy deletion nomination?

There are a multitude of other pages regarding lesser known people that have not been deleted. also can you tell me what I can do to be a better participant in wiki? I am still learning about this tool.

thanks!

Santos —Preceding unsigned comment added by SantosPerdidos (talk • contribs) 06:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Climate Infobox

I noticed you posted a climate infobox in the Timmins, Ontario article then immediately removed it. I thought it would be a good addition. --Renrenren (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

What?

How did i attack anyone, i merely added a paragraph to the article about an album that was left out of the page. I don't even know the guy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.200.125 (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Link

Explain what is "inappropriate" about adding his organization's website to his article? He is the national director of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan and KKK.com is their website. Agg56tt (talk) 23:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed this comment, as well, and investigated the edit. I'm not sure your reasoning for removing the link, Kyle. Do you have any particular guidelines to back it up? Did you look closely at the edit or follow the link? I'm curious to find out more. I'm also inclined to bring a trout to this discussion, since one could very easily take umbrage at the language used in your message. --inquietudeofcharacter (talk) 23:14, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, Kyle. I totally understand. No worries, and take care! --inquietudeofcharacter (talk) 04:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Elena Berkova

If you want to refer to this porn star as Jewish, cite your sources. In the Ukrainian Wikipedia and Russian-language sources her ethnicity is stated as Ukrainian.--24.185.132.44 (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Alan-wakelogo.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alan-wakelogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 09:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:IntuitCanadalogo.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IntuitCanadalogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 22:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Cashcabcanadalogo.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cashcabcanadalogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 00:04, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Ok Delete My Articles

You deleted my articles ok... I'm angry... >-(( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isadora1234 (talk • contribs) 09:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Red Maple Leaf Award Please allow me to offer this maple leaf as a token of appreciation for your contribution to Alberta and Canada related articles. Keep up the great work! --Qyd (talk) 02:24, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Red Maple Leaf Award Please allow me to offer this maple leaf as a token of appreciation for your contribution to Alberta and Canada related articles. Keep up the great work! --Qyd (talk) 02:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Kyle,

I noticed you uploaded an image of mine of Icon to commons. Just wanted to say thanks, and feel free to upload any more of my CC-BY-SA images (pretty much all of them except for those with human subjects) as you see fit. I wonder though if you could do me the favour of making a note on my talk page here or on commons so I know what you've uploaded. I sometimes upload my own stuff, and I wouldn't want to duplicate effort. Thanks again! Bulliver (talk) 01:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi again. Please don't apologize. To be perfectly clear, I am thrilled you are uploading my photos. I licensed them specifically so they could be used on projects like wikipedia. Just had no time to upload them myself lately. Cheers! Bulliver (talk) 08:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Charles Trippy Youtube celebrity source

http://www.tampabay.com/news/humaninterest/article972026.ece http://www.istardom.com/index.php?star=CharlesTrippy#tabArea

I cant figure out the coding, but these are good sources.

Korean War Aces contains a link to a web pages that contains offensive material to deceased American servicemen. I do not find a blinking LOL over the deaths of 103 pilots to be appropriate.

Thanks!

I always appreciate when a user has my back regarding the abuse of my talk page. Thank you very much for the assist.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Asking a favour.

Hi, I saw that you created the image on the Barbados–Canada_relations article ( [6] ). Thanks! I wanted to ask a favour. Do you suppose when you had a bit of free time you could reverse the colours for the two nations??? I tried to alter the text below the template (the one with the flags on the right-hand side of that article's page) and I've been unsuccessful. The template doesn't quite let me alter the colour key below. The only other alternative would be to move the article instead to "Canada–Barbados_relations" for the colours to match what is on the map, and the article to match the template. However, I think WP prefers the Barbados-Canada name style since, it is in alphabetical error? The only problem is if I leave it as "Barbados–Canada_relations", it now says Barbados is the Green one and Canada is the Orange one.  :-) *I'm going to set this page on "watch" for a bit, so that if you wanted to respond you could just do that here under my comment. CaribDigita (talk) 04:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

For sure give me a day or two and it will be done. Cheers Kyle1278 21:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks so much for all your assistance. Take your time, I'm just grateful for the favour esp. since I don't have access to the Photoshop apps. this semester. Regards, CaribDigita (talk) 22:30, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Coords — DEC vs. DMS

Hi. You've been making a slight error in the title coordinates you've put in several articles, e.g. Wimborne, Alberta, taking coordinates expressed in decimal degrees and interpreting them as degrees minutes & seconds. The problem is that minutes are 1/60-ths of a degree, not 1/100-ths, and seconds are 1/60²-ths of a degree, not 1/100²-ths.

Note the differences between the 1st and 4th, and the 2nd and 3rd below:

{{Coord|51.514907|-113.354354 }}	→	51.514907°N 113.354354°W / 51.514907; -113.354354
{{Coord|51.514907|-113.354354 |format=dms}}	→	51°30′54″N 113°21′16″W
{{Coord|51|51|49.07|N|113|35|43.54|W }}	→	51°51′49.07″N 113°35′43.54″W
{{Coord|51|51|49.07|N|113|35|43.54|W |format=dec }}	→	51.8636306°N 113.5954278°W / 51.8636306; -113.5954278

Also, unless you're giving the coords of something more specific than the general center of a place, there's no need to be so precise — 0.01″ defines a location to within about 30 centimetres, while 0.000001° defines it to within about 10 cm.

—WWoods (talk) 18:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to reiterate what Wwoods (talk · contribs) said with regard to Kilwinning, Saskatchewan and Allan Hills, Saskatchewan. I've been having trouble finding reliable data on these places, by the way. Where are you getting your data from? --Stepheng3 (talk) 03:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

If you cite the books and maps you're using by name, you'd be protecting your articles from speedy deletion. Let me know if you'd like help figuring out how to do this. Likewise with coding coordinates. I love to see folks contributing and building up their Wikipedia skills. Good luck, --Stepheng3 (talk) 04:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Smosh Productions

Why can not I put the list of productions Smosh? --Plus18 (talk) 04:46, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Phil

I just updated Phil's page with lots of new things and made it much better, what do you think?--Alizaa2 (talk) 04:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

idiots keep deleting it so watch out.--Alizaa2 (talk) 17:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, I was wondering if you could look into the argument between myself and Alizaa2(talk) that has been played out between our respective talk pages, as you have decalred an intrest with the article in question in the past. 81.86.244.17 (talk) 19:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for looking into the disagreement, I have refereed it to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents as you suggested 81.86.244.17 (talk) 14:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Kingston, Ontario

Good job with that climate table on the Kingston, Ontario page, Kyle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by StevenBlack (talk • contribs) 22:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

how does one remove the template, under construction on The Pittie family in Pune? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randy1220 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

how does one remove the template, under construction on The Pittie family in Pune? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randy1220 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Ayi jihu

Hi Kyle, I declined your speedy deletion request on this article. It makes a reasonable claim of notability. LadyofShalott 05:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

You've been loved by IShadowed

Hey there! IShadowed has loved you by placing a heart icon in the top-right corner of your userpage. Don't worry, it's not vandalism, but simply a small way to spread the WikiLove. If you don't really like it, feel free to revert it and make it go away, and no hard feelings; after all, it's just a small token of appreciation. If you like it, just add your name here, but again, there's no need to feel upset if you don't. Love and best wishes,  IShadowed  ✰  03:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Wired logo.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wired logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:35, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Smosh

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Smosh. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smosh (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For the many, many articles I constantly see you create to make a more conclusive encyclopedia. Great work A8UDI 04:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

"Lake" in Saskatchewan

Hi Kyle,

It's good to have all these starters on communities in Saskatchewan, e.g. Wakaw Lake, Saskatchewan. As I edit articles about lake once in a while, I was wondering if you could include a link to the lake the name refers to or even a short description about the lake it was named for. -- 签名 _sig at 19:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For all the geography articles you've just created! --Rosiestep (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

• Hear hear. Good work. Drmies (talk) 04:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Um...

So do you know like every municipality in Ontario or are you just magical or something special? A8UDI 03:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

"Lake" in Saskatchewan

Hi, did you have time to look at User_talk:Kyle1278/October-November_09#.22Lake.22_in_Saskatchewan? -- 签名 _sig at 11:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. Good. When I have some time, I will try to expand some of the already existing ones. -- 签名 _sig at 07:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nitrous oxide (musician)

Hello Kyle1278, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Nitrous oxide (musician) - a page you tagged - because: Couple of tracks released by a notable label is a credible assertion of notability. PROD or take to AfD if required. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. GedUK  18:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wem logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wem logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 10:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Edmontonalberta RAM RF.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edmontonalberta RAM RF.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 10:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cashcabcanadalogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cashcabcanadalogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 10:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Sub stubs

Hi. Have you checked to see if these settlements are really notable? I believe most inhabited settlements are notable but check out Clinton for instance on a google map here. Do you see a town, or even anything that looks remotely like a village? You might be excused with village articles on the developing world not finding much online but for countries like Canada and Australia there really ought to be government/census detail online so at least they are referenced... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 23:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Loveday, South Australia is still on the short side but at least it now resembles an encyclopedia article, as it stands that is a decent stub. Its just in my experience stubs about hamlets or small villages, especially one liners x is a village in South Australia that's it, tend to be lying about a long time.... That's not to say we shouldn't have them, I believe we should have articles on most populated settlements but developing them to a decent level is the difficult part given the few editors who actively work on them. I've created more than my fair share of short stubs in my time and I gradually learned that most of them do not get expanded within a short time frame anyway so it is basically the responsibility of the creator to at least add a fact or two and a reference. This is why now I try to ensure the stubs contain at least some information so they are useful stubs even if sources are not abundant and not demanding other editors to try to fill out the one liners. I understand the quality vs quantity problem. At times it is a dilemna because you often find like hundreds or thousands of articles on one topic missing which wikipedia should have articles on by now but you only have limited amount of time to get through them so quality is often reduced in favour of tackling a mass. I find the more time you spend on each stubs the less motivated you feel in tackling masses of articles on the same subject. I understand, its finding a balance.... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The Walterdale Playhouse

I'm planning to completely destroy and rebuild that article, unless you object. See the talk page. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 01:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities (4th nomination)

As a major contributor to the article, I am letting you know about the 4th AFD. Ikip (talk) 21:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

• That "Shaycarl" article isn't mine, but thanks for alerting me to it. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Not at all. I agree with the nomination and I voted "delete." --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Jamaica

Hi Kule, Can you fix the coordinates. Lionel Town, Jamaica currently displays on google maps as in south India. You've made the same mistake on all of them. You've added a - and a W into the display title so it ends up making it east!!! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank You!

Thanks for the acknowledgement! Cheers, Koppenlady (talk) 23:15, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saint Andrews, New Zealand

The article Saint Andrews, New Zealand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable locality. Doesn't appear in the Reed Atlas of New Zealand, or on Google maps in this location. There are places named St Andrews in New Zealand, but they're not more than localities, and they aren't at the coords given

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

If this is simply that you mistyped the coordinates, then feel free to just correct them and remove the prod notice. However, I doubt that the locality near Timaru is particularly notable either, although I can confirm that it exists. Are you simply filling in articles for the redlinks in List of towns in New Zealand, or do you have a particular interest in the localities you are creating stubs for? My feeling is that not every placename listed on a map is suitable for an article, and it might be better to remove the entries from the list article for localities which are little more than a placename. My personal rule of thumb is that locality is suitable for an article if it has a primary school, although there are undoubtedly localities which never had or no longer have a school but have a rich history or some unusual feature which makes them worth writing about.gadfium 18:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt response.-gadfium 19:02, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

No worries

It was a case of - some of them we didn't have, and should (and it's a good prompt to create them!) - while others were too small and were more properly localities than towns. No harm done, and thanks for the nice message. Orderinchaos 11:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Youtube nobodies

AFD them all. In my view they should have been speedied.... I'll strongly support the deletion of all of them. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Short articles

Hi. I've seen a lot of your contributions, many of which are possibly too short for inclusion as they stand. Are you planning to go back and flesh this latest round out beyond "X is an indian reservation in Alberta?" I just deleted one of these and I was about to do more until I realized who was creating them. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:45, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

• Cool.  :) Good luck and have fun! I promise not to delete any future contributions of this sort now that I know where you're coming from. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

disambiguation of Quebec placenames

The French Wikipedia seems to disambiguate Quebec placenames by MRC, as in fr:Saint-Sébastien (Le Granit). You created Saint-Sébastien, Estrie, Quebec, which disambiguates by administrative region. Should the English article be moved to Saint-Sébastien, Le Granit, Quebec to be consistent? Three pages have links to that page: See Special:WhatLinksHere/Saint-Sébastien,_Le_Granit,_Quebec. I added some information from the French article to the English article and wanted to add interwiki links to both pages, which is why I am asking this question. This also applies to any other municipalities in Le Granit with names duplicated elsewhere. - Eastmain (talk) 17:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Mary Ansell

Hi,

I saw that you tagged Mary Ansell for CSD A7. The article is unreferenced and might not pass AfD for notability concerns but does try to make a claim of notability. Could you review the tag? Thanks -- Raziman T V (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

The lady was the youngest person to suffer in the post 1868 era and here case was the subject of much public debate, including twice ( ?) in parliament. From the detail available on the web (precis of local newspapers at the time.'truecrime' writeup) she appears as worthy of recording as the much better known Ruth Ellis! Bob aka Linuxlad (talk) 19:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Later ... I've tried to add some of the refs I stumbled over, while trying to discover the background to her sad short little life. It's always hard to argue against sceptics on notability in such cases - but there's too much here to condense down to a line in a list of 'notable executions' I think. Enough for tag removal?? Your call. Linuxlad (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yatton, Ontario

The article Yatton, Ontario has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not actually provide any information, can be found in List of communities in Ontario.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Perspeculum (talk) 20:11, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

I put some text into this article, I don't think, it could be deleted. I would like to keep it. --Eino81 (talk) 11:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Winnipeg

Hi. I do have a source for why I edited the record temperature for Winnipeg in July and the Record in Winnipeg. If you go to http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climateData/dailydata_e.html?timeframe=2&Prov=XX&StationID=3703&Year=1936&Month=7&Day=1 then look at July 11, it says 42.2 I just didn't knwo how to add this as a source to change the july and year record. --SuperDuy (talk) 01:19, 29 December 2009