Dibol

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Dibol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Jachin 03:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Syphon Filter

Thanks Diabol, but there is still some more work needed especially Mara Aramov, Edward Benton, Thomas Markinson, PHARCOM, Jonathan Phagan. --SGCommand (talk • contribs) 13:51, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

I will do what I can to update those profiles. I apologize for the inconvenience.

Dibol

Changing the original title of a c't article

Please refrain from changing the original title of the c't article "Jede dritte stirbt den Hitzetod" to something different. The original title/quotation is perfectly sound German, there is no need to change it at all, and changing it does not only slightly alter the meaning, but is also wrong because the original is the actual title of the c't article. Please read the discussion page Talk:Xbox 360 technical problems Mahjongg (talk) 19:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Response to ANI report

I have responded to your report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please read the information there and in the links. Cheers, — Scientizzle 00:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The Matrix Online

Just so you know, you seem to be teetering on the 3RR with your reversions of the spinoff thing. If the editor makes the change again it would probably be best to let another editor revert it. I agree with your position on there so I'll keep an eye out for the change and make the revert if it happens again.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 19:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Looking for help to improve Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Hi, I noticed that you edited the article Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare recently and I am just letting you know that I plan on working on the article over the next few weeks in order to bring it up to Featured Article status. If you have time, please consider helping out with the article by improving the referencing, content, and other miscellaneous activities in order for the article to meet the standards set out at WP:WIAFA. Thanks for your time! Gary King (talk) 05:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for sending me the message. I'll see what I can do. Dibol (talk) 05:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

In a recent edit to the page Grand Theft Auto IV, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. The article uses British English as it is developed in the UK. xenocidic (talk) 05:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Hello

As much as I'd like to help you, I'm hesitant to do so, seeing as there are discussions of deleting the Predator technology article altogether. If it is decided to keep it, then I will see what I can do. Dark hyena (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Minor characters in 24, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Even though as a 24 editor myself, this is assumed, Wikipedia really isn't the place for OR, or "assumed" facts. Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 06:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

R.E, Wageslave

I actually haven't started an RFC - yet. Right now, I'm just keeping a record of his POV edits, for a future RFC, should he continue editing in the same way. Anyway, if you have anything to add to the draft feel free to add it. Thanks. Frvernchanezzz (talk) 10:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

No Problem

Glad to help.Cheers Kyle1278 13:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dibol! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Lia Montelongo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Becky Gable - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Brian Glynn (wrestler) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Ed Yurek - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Jeff Kribs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Ali Hillis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Mass Effect 2

Hello, I am Kilkia and, unfortunately, I had to undo your changes to the plot section for the game. I hope you understand, but the original version was better. It introduced Shepard earlier, and fit in better in context; because the Normandy was introduced as under attack, it seems fitting that Shepard be introduced with it as its commanding officer and the main protagonist. While your edits are quite excellent and well-intentioned, I think that just stating that Commander Shepard rescues Joker without any mention of who Shepard is just seems off; a newcomer may not know that Shepard is the main protagonist. On this matter, stating how Shepard flies away admist explosions is unnecessary. He is flung away because the Normandy is attacked; the explosions are just background happenings and don't actually affect him - they are the result of the Normandy being destroyed, which is what is summarized already.

I do not normally post apologies/explanations such as this one, but I felt it appropriate, as I had to undo two of your other minor changes to the plot in order to overall undo one main change. Thus, it seems I was 'undo-happy' after undoing three of your changes in rapid succession. Sorry for that, but I hope you understand why I undid your changes to the plot. Again, it is nothing personal. I just believe, yes it is just my opinion, that the original version was better and looks quite professional. :)

-- Kilkia123 (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi again, and thank you for your mature response to my above message. Now, however, some editors have decided to "simplify" the plot section of the game. Could you please take a look at the current plot section and discuss any changes you do not like? I have made a post of my opinion in the discussion page. I for one believe the original plot version as of your latest edits was the better version. I am not trying to be rude to the other editors, but now there are quite a few things wrong with the current plot section, including grammar and information being needlessly taken out.

-- Kilkia123 (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I have read your response, and I'll have to agree I suppose. While I still don't believe the old version was "too long," compromising will, like you said, work out better than fighting for something most others don't agree on. Thanks for actually replying; nobody else has said a word in the discussion page. I'll put in some time soon to edit the whole thing for the various grammatical errors I see. I also might add in some information, however, as some parts of the current plot section don't seem to make much sense without added context. -- Kilkia123 (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

January 2011

Your recent edit to the page Six Days in Fallujah appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 23:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

If that's the case, then I apologize. It appeared to be an unsourced addition. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 03:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

No hard feelings. You had the right intention, and people make mistakes.Dibol (talk) 03:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance: Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

This is a note to let the main editors of Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on November 5, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 5, 2011. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare is a 2007 first-person shooter video game, developed by Infinity Ward and published by Activision for PC, Macintosh, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and Wii. A separate handheld game was made separately for the Nintendo DS. The game was released in North America, Australia, and Europe in November 2007 for video game consoles and Windows. It was released for the Mac in September 2008, then released for the Wii in November 2009, given the name Reflex Edition. It is the fourth installment in the Call of Duty video game series, excluding expansion packs, and is the first in the Modern Warfare line of the franchise, followed by a direct sequel, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 as well as the first game in the series to have a Mature rating. The game breaks away from the World War II setting of previous games in the series and is instead set in modern times. Call of Duty 4 was in development for two years, and it uses a proprietary game engine. On September 10, 2009, it was re-released in Japan by Square-Enix. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 00:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

ME3 reception

Hi Dibol,

Please don't rephrase sentence like you did to the article on Mass Effect 3. 'The fanbase' implies every single fan. If you can find a source that backs that up, add it. If not, 'some fans' is sufficient. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 10:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. When you recently edited Jet Li: Rise to Honor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Mask (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red Planet (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immolating (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Art of War (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MI-5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Aliens: Colonial Marines

Hi Dibol,

Concerning this edit, why do you think this is better? It's the plot of the optional downloadable content, which isn't necessarily part of the main game itself. Like this and other media that act as prequels, it doesn't make sense to put it before the plot of what the article is actually about. --Soetermans. T / C 22:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

While the DLC is optional content, the story is part of the game's canon regardless of player/fan reception. Long before the DLC came out, the entire story was incomplete especially when it came to explaining Corporal Hicks's survival. I honestly feel that putting prequel content after the main story just doesn't make the summary feel right, at all, regardless of the story content being optional DLC, or part of the main game. Splinter Cell: Conviction's plot summary worked fine regardless of the co-op content not being DLC, and I'm just trying to keep things consistent. Dibol (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Blacklist help needed

FYI, you expand a summary in List of The Blacklist episodes in this edit. I believe the opening sentences (not added by you) were copied from this site. The removal leaves the summary incomplete, you might consider editing the summary to add some missing information, in your own words.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

At the time of editing the summary for this episode, the information was complete and concise as it is. I did not even copy anything from the link you gave me, since I have personally seen the episode. Dibol (talk) 23:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Modes field in Template:Infobox video game

Dibol, I understand the information you're trying to add to the infobox, however, the documentation for the template is clear that the only values this field should contain are Single-player and/or Multi-player. If you wish to change how the template field is used, you need to take it up on the template's talk page.

This is also being discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games in a section about Destiny.

-- ferret (talk) 00:26, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Dibol, there is a pretty strong consensus against these edits. As such, edits like this are unacceptable. Please stop or you may be blocked from editing. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 02:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Destiny (video game). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. I'm viewing this as disruptive editing at this point. -- ferret (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Ferret, how was my recent edit considered disruptive? After looking at Destiny's talk page, Mika1h actually reviewed the cited sources in question that made sense. Let me copy and paste it here. "From what I gathered reading those articles and seeing some YouTube videos, the game is single player in the same vein as other MMOs in that you can solo it, but there are still other people running around on the same server. That would make it multiplayer-only game, no matter what Bungie claims. --Mika1h (talk) 23:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)" From my perspective here, everyone on that discussion page seems to be clinging into the idea that "because Bungie was completely vague about the game, the "Single Player/Multiplayer" modes should be fine as it is. Well, I don't see that is the case. From the ground up, Bungie's claim of a "Persistent World game" exactly functions like an MMORPG, except with a smaller scale.Dibol (talk) 20:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

It's disruptive in the sense that you had been asked to stop removing the content as well as inserting DRM statement and there are on going discussions. Let the discussion conclude then take action. -- ferret (talk) 21:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Castle episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parallel universe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your Robocop edit

Hi there,

I accept that you may be frustrated, but this is not really an acceptable edit summary - even if you are correct. Edit summary guidelines are covered here - a summary of summaries if you will. Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Far Cry 4. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 14:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Li Mei

I reverted your edit to Li Mei because every MK character section is split into three individual parts: roles in games/ multimedia, character development, and reception; and it needs to stay that way. Her appearance in MKX is no different, nor did you provide an edit summary. A source also needs to be cited for her voice actor since the actors are not directly credited in the game, nor does Li Mei's actress appear on the game's listing on IMDb. Thank you for your cooperation. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 21:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Call of Duty characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Murray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Masters of the Universe (song)

The article Masters of the Universe (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 21:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dibol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits

I see two problems here with your recent editing: you seem to edit warring using both your account and an IP in the same article, as in Black Hawk Down (film), and you're leaving uncivil edit summaries, as in this edit, where you call someone a "moron". I understand that it may be frustrating to correct misinformation, but you still shouldn't resort to name-calling in edit summaries. The edit warring thing is a bit more serious, and you need to take disputes to an article's talk page instead of indefinitely reverting someone. It's additionally problematic to edit war using multiple accounts. It's allowable to edit while logged-out, but you should not do so to continue (or start) edit wars. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Black Hawk Down (film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dibol. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to KGBeast, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DarkKnight2149 20:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Flash clone listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Flash clone. Since you had some involvement with the Flash clone redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Aliens (film)‎. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

I see you were blocked last month for edit-warring, so I'm sure you know what this notice means; it's a formality, I'm afraid. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 14:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Category expansion

I may need help including more pages to the category I added in the Wikipedia. The page about Superhero films featuring female antagonists. And I wonder if you might know any other Superhero film which could be included in it.

Could you help about it? I will wait until I have an answer. Iago PUC (talk) 16:17, June 26 2018 (UTC)

What's with Avengers Infinity War page?

I have edited again. But this time more concisely. And of course I didn't scribble the whole SCRIPT of the film. Yeah I understand that I put some unnecessary stuffs. Check the new edit.

Shreerag KS (talk) 14:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

I re-read it. The thing is the sentence is WAY TOO LONG as it is. Mentioning the reversal of time just makes the statement. Just in a summary sense, Maximoff TRIED to destroy the stone, but Thanos already got it regardless of her efforts. It's the wording equivalent of 1+1=2 versus 1+1+1-1=2.Dibol (talk) 19:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Socking notice about you on Admin board.

See here [1] Thanks. Esuka323 (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dibol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dibol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm 2600:8800:1880:188:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Alyson Court, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! 2600:8800:1880:188:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Biographies of living persons discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Woodroar (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

March 2019

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Alyson Court. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 01:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

I reverted your edits again at Alyson Court. As I mentioned in the discussion at Talk:Alyson Court last year, claims by people on Twitter can be used to support claims about themselves but never other living persons. We also can't combine sources to create a plausible narrative but have to stick to what the sources actually say, and we should generally let reliable, third-party sources guide our articles. Sure, our policies and guidelines aren't always followed uniformly across the project, but that's because we have more than 5.8 million articles, virtually everyone is a volunteer, and many people just don't know better. Someone breaking a policy doesn't mean we should allow BLP-violating content everywhere. If you'd like to discuss this further, please come back to the Talk page. Continuing to add poorly-sourced content about living persons is just going to end up with your account and your IP addresses blocked and the article protected from editing by new users. Woodroar (talk) 10:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Woodroar (talk) 18:13, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at WP:ANI, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that page guidelines state that you should not break up another editor's text by interleaving your own replies to individual points. Woodroar (talk) 22:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Question

Why would you revert something like that? - wolf 15:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

• I checked the link itself after you edited. It redirects to the Special Mission Unit page. There's almost no point in giving a different term if it will lead to the same page in question.Dibol (talk) 01:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Sylvester Stallone filmography

Hi Dibol, per WP:BURDEN, please take a moment to add a reliable inline citation to the disputed entry at Sylvester Stallone filmography. Thank you very much in advance. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Takayuki Yagami

By any chance could you revise Takayuki Yagami like you did with Lost Judgment. L Judgment is inaccessible to me because I don't live in America and thus hasn't been imported yet. Especially since the article is GA. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 11:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

I’ll see what I can do during whatever free time I have. We’ll need to keep in mind that I can’t just copy and paste Lost Judgment’s plot summary onto the page and call it a day. Dibol (talk) 11:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Yep. I have no idea what is Lost Judgment is about though so far since I avoided checking playthroughs or reading the plot section of that article. The only thing I know is that Yagami can do the Fortnite Dance.Tintor2 (talk) 12:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

April 2022

Your recent editing history at The Blacklist (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PAVLOV (talk) 16:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at The Blacklist (TV series). Comment on content, not on fellow editors. PAVLOV (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dibol reported by User:PAVLOV (Result: ). Thank you. PAVLOV (talk) 16:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Katalin Zamiar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katalin Zamiar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katalin Zamiar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 22:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Terminator Resistance

Just wanted to say thanks for the collaboration on improving the synopsis stuff on the entry for Terminator Resistance. Apache287 (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Mortal Kombat 11 canonical ending

Hi Dibol, you again reverted me. You should know better, we need consensus to include something; I do not need to show there is a reason not to have it. Wikipedia is not a democracy. You have been issued several warnings and have been blocked several times. Please do not let this little tid escalate into another ANI discussion about your editing. Please undo your revert and seek further consensus and stop edit warring. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 17:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of David McGarry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David McGarry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David McGarry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cleo Cooper (talk) 01:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)