SuperDuy

Edits

Please do not continue to add incorrect information to the article Winnipeg. As I have stated on the article you need to provide a source to change the information, and so far all you edit to the article have not included one. If you can provide a soucre to what you claim it can be changed but until then it cannot. Please read this it will help you understand better what i am saying and it can help you add a cite. Cheers Kyle1278 02:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

January 2013

Hello, I'm Bidgee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Eucla, Western Australia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 06:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

It'd be better to wait for the Bureau to update its climate data to mention the new record, or perhaps use a media release that mentions it. The Bureau's quality control procedures can be pretty rigorous for extreme events like this. The record will be mentioned in the daily observations for Eucla tomorrow, but I'd much rather use data with at least some quality control. Graham87 15:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Nope, only a BOM media release or climate data update would be acceptable. As you pointed out, Weatherzone got the data wrong anyway. Please reply on my user talk page, not my user page, and sign your message with four tildes like this: "~~~~". Graham87 00:30, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I've replied at my talk page. Graham87 11:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Mildura

Yes, I've undone the edits. Anybody can do that; unfortunately it'd be quite hard to block the responsible person. By the way, I've removed Categry:Mildura that you added to my talk page; please don't add categories to talk pages like that. Graham87 06:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)