User talk:Aviram7/Archive/January -December/2023

Please Bring Back My Edit

Nolan Bushnell Didn't Founded ShowBiz Pizza He Founded Chuck E. Cheese Everyone Knows That 2600:1702:1A00:A370:B0A0:D849:6C15:B993 (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

@2600:1702:1A00:A370:B0A0:D849:6C15:B993 Hello, Sorry We cannot restore your edit on Nolan Bushnell because you change content on this article but not provide reliable source, Ya, I'm aware about that he didn't founded ShowBiz Pizza but He Founded Chuck E. Cheese, i suggest to you if you change or add content in any article then you also given reliable source for Verification neither they will be revert to removed by other editors on Wikipedia. Kind regards 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 15:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

"Page blanking"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Page_blanking
"Page blanking means editing a page and removing its content to leave it completely blank, or without any substantial content."
Removing 3 words is not "page blanking" and does not warrant instant reversion and private messages with warnings. Havsjö (talk) 11:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Revert on the day's events

Hello Aviram7, I didn't understand your revert to my contribution about the execution in Iran, which was re-added minutes later. Did you think I was vandal who was edit-warring with another user there? I wasn't. Anyway, it's not that I'm mad or anything, I just wanted to know whether the revert was because of that confusion or because the news didn't pass the threshold of notability. Cheers. 190.246.97.81 (talk) 09:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

@190.246.97.81 Hello and thaks for informing about my fault, I was reverted your edit by mistake because in my area we face some specific probelm releated to internet network/wifi connectivity at home, sorry for about but we try to not revert good faiths edits.Kind regards 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 09:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

My contribution on Liliaceae and Lilium

Could you at least explain me why you remove my edit on Liliaceae and Lilium ? I add the phylogenetic tree that show the relation. Why do you remove them ? 124.121.32.107 (talk) 14:08, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Shawne Kleckner: Revision history

Noted that I replied to your comment and not to your talk page. Please advise if you would like me to re-create the comment here. 98.97.11.130 (talk) 17:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

My apologies as I am doing research on the industry and looking to fill holes as I review various items.

Jack Kirby page

I know I apologize that was not my intention. I was trying to add another bullet point to the Legacy section. There is an art gallery named after him at the Disney hotel ny. That's another piece of his legacy that should be added. I think I might have messed up the reference though. I undid it so it's ok. I was trying to add this new information, * The Disney Hotel New York – The Art of Marvel at Disneyland Paris features an art gallery called, the "Jack Kirby Legacy Gallery." The gallery features original work from Kirby and rotating exhibits from other artists throughout the year centered around different themes. <ref>{{cite news |last=Wayne |first=Michael |title=We stayed at … Disney Hotel New York – The Art of Marvel, Paris, France |website=Escape.com |url=https://www.escape.com.au/destinations/europe/france/paris/we-stayed-at-disney-hotel-new-york-the-art-of-marvel-paris-france/news-story/8b0e3d7f464d84b5f4aea78af9a9abdf |date=February 2, 2023 |archive-url=https://www.escape.com.au/destinations/europe/france/paris/we-stayed-at-disney-hotel-new-york-the-art-of-marvel-paris-france/news-story/8b0e3d7f464d84b5f4aea78af9a9abdf%7Carchive-date=June 18, 2023|url-status=live |access-date=June 18, 2023 <ref> Can you help me? I don't edit often but I feel this is important. 173.66.8.230 (talk) 03:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Robb Thomas

I literally made these changes using his NFL stats that are all over the internet and referenced on his page. The data came from stats. Simple as that. None of it was crazy changes other then adding words to his statistics. 2601:1C0:847F:559E:1146:63D3:42CC:3274 (talk) 04:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Three-card Monte

Greetings, I am new to Wikipedia and attempted to edit Three-card Monte and it shows you reverted my edit. Could you help me understand why or what I might need to do differently in the future? Dpeasant1 (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Dpeasant1 Hello, this edit is like External link because youtube is not source to aporove Notable not proved and Wikipedia only beleive Reliable Source I hope next time you add reliable content with WP:RS. Kind regards 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 13:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Mitchel Bakker

https://www.atalanta.it/en/news/a-new-dutchman-is-in-town-welcome-bakker/ Proof of the Bakker transfer that was deleted 86.182.223.172 (talk) 09:11, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

1939 AAA Championship Car season

My modification base on the "ChampCarStats.com": http://www.champcarstats.com/year/1939.htm. This is already in the reference list, I don't know how can I mention again. I edited already all "Final points standings" from 1920 to 1941, what based on the already referred works. And I want to uppload that in the next few days, please don't withdraw. 94.44.249.64 (talk) 14:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

@94.44.249.64 Hi there, we reverted you're edit because lacks of reliable source and I don't see any reference you providing in article, so you carefully to edit article again in future with reliable source with trustable content. 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 16:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello Aviram7, thank you for noticing. On the KF Shkupi page there is a link to their Čair Stadium (North Macedonia) page. On that page you can see more about the capacity of the stadium. I think the update on the Stadium page are more recent. I might be wrong I've never been there. Maybe the stadium page needs updating... I'm not a skilled Wikipedia user so I hope you'll read this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baukewijnsma (talk • contribs) 12:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Togo

I fixed a typo, where the HDI was listed as 162th instead of 162nd, but you reverted my edit. 78.145.94.86 (talk) 06:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Changes to Louis Rowe´s profile

Hi Aviram, I´m a friend of Louis and played with him on the 1996 Championship team in Sweden. I found it strange that one of his championships in Europe wasn't mentioned. I'm not sure, but I also think Louis won a championship in Belgium. 85.224.143.192 (talk) 06:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

@85.224.143.192 Hello we reverted you're edit due to lacks of reliable source but you change some content of this page and do not given WP:CITE or reliable source for verification of your edit, Wikipedia only trust on WP:CITE or reliable source and he trust not original research but you claim you're a friend of subject (Louis). If you next time think to edit a this page then give reliable source. 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 11:56, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Changes to Akshay Kelkar's profile

Akshay was born in 1993. He has said it in multiple interviews. It's not 1992 103.169.76.164 (talk) 06:43, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your comment at WP:PERM

I saw your comment on a WP:PERM request, and I believe it is inappropriate to give advice like this to admins because they already know what to verify before providing rights to a user, and I think You are writing in English using a translator. Is it so? 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 15:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer Hello and Thank for notification about my comment on WP:PERM but i don't use google translate for translation on English Wikipedia because I have able to written English in little bit and I'm aware about that. Kind regards 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 16:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Jelly Roll Morton

Please re-review. reliable sources were present as needed. Yours, 166.199.7.40 (talk) 03:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

@166.199.7.40 Hello and Thanks for Notification of my fault edit, apologize for reverting your edit due to network distruction. 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 03:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

WP interactions

Hi, User Aviram. Just a quick bat here to acknowledge your restraint in not getting into a tit-for-tat on my talk page, or a revert war at the Thunder Road page. It is unusual, and most welcome. I also wanted to acknowledge your various "frustration" notices on your user page. I've seen your name around more than a few times wherever WP takes me, but I had not seen them before (and it has been some time since I have been to your user page). I know you always mean well, and hope that whatever's causing your trials abates (if that is possible), or at least strongly lessens (if one can hope for at least that much). 2601:196:180:DC0:C491:2058:E479:9668 (talk) 12:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

@2601:196:180:DC0:C491:2058:E479:9668 Hello, But I cannot understand your talk?Can you full explain about that? 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 12:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Re: my talk page posting, the first point made was that you did not single out the specific edit your were objecting to, you mass reverted it and every edit I had made up to it, which is not cricket at all WP. The proper thing to do is to focus on the specific item of disagreement and try to resolve it, not undo other items unrelated to it as collateral damage. Which were not "unconstructive", and every one of which had a clear edit explanation given to it, individually.

The second point was that all my edit did (in spite of what I sought to provide as a helpful explanation of why I was doing what I was doing, and reference to a grammar site, which evidently proved confounding) was remove what was in effect a scolding hidden comment embedded by a previous editor finger-wagging at other editors to "do as they're told" and leave the passage alone. It *didn't change the edit* being henned over. Just removed the upbraiding message. (Even though, as I was to later learn when I went back and double-checked, it should have both removed the message and changed the grammar, as both were wrong.)

The next point was a rebuff of being accused of doing "sandbox" edits in a WP article, instead of my own user space. None of my edits were - they were all clear changes, with clear explanations. If none of that was clear to you then you might be better served to stick to reverting new changes you can more confidently tackle, and leave the more demanding ones to native English speakers (wherever they're from), or more advanced speakers (of which India indeed has a great many, a great number of whom work in English customer and technical support); there are no stones being thrown here. I admire the multi-lingual.

The final item of the post was a declaration from me that I intended to restore the reverted edits as made - which I did, attempting to successfully reincorportate other legitimate edits made after your reversion but before I saw a notice of it. Which I did - including subsequently correcting the grammar that the hidden note had told users to leave alone, which I recognized was actually wrong all along, and quoted the relevant guideline on how to handle such singular uses of "series" involving a verb, as applied to the contentious passage.

That guideline:

When you use series (singular) with a verb, you should use the singular form of the verb:

"The series of relationships was disastrous."

(From: https://proofed.com/writing-tips/is-a-series-singular-or-plural/ Is “a Series” Singular or Plural? | Proofed's Writing Tips)

The contested passage from the Thunder Road plot:

Incorrect, as originally stated: "When a series of government raids destroys their hidden stills,"

Correct, with a singular verb: "When a series of government raids destroy their hidden stills,"

(See correct verb conjugation following "series" used in the plural lower on that page, if you are interested.)

I hope this makes all the salient points of my talk page post clear to you. Good day. 2601:196:180:DC0:9100:703D:706B:794B (talk) 17:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

WWT Updated Employee Headcount and Revenue

https://www.wwt.com/corporate/why-wwt/overview 67.184.178.62 (talk) 16:15, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

@67.184.178.62 you did not provide reliable Source or reference according to your change, So I reverted you're edit because Wikipedia only trust on reliable source. ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 09:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

1. Please do not write "unexplained page blanking" in the edit summary, as you did in Child labour in the diamond industry and multiple others [1], when the revision being reverted is not a simple blanking of page content.
2. Your reverts in Wikipedia:Expectations and norms of the Wikipedia community and multiple others [2] are clearly inappropriate. Please be more careful when reverting other people's changes, and when other editors respond to your warning on talk page, do not ignore them.

2602:FC24:13:1:E4F7:9065:0:1 (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Changes on a page

Hi Aviram, I'd like to add an addendum to my last changes on a wikipedia page;

The nearest thing to a citation I can give you is a wayback link if this is plausible: ([3]https://web.archive.org/web/20201126132255/https://www.kingsdownschool.co.uk/alumni/tommy-hatto

If you google "Kingsdown School Alumni Tommy Hatto" he previously was named on the school website as a notable alumni of 2008 (Wayback machine needed, link already made above). Kingsdown school is a school for children aged 11-16. Finishing school at 2008 at the age of 16, makes his birth year 1992 (I need to note here too, finishing school at 13, skipping 3 years which would be the case for a 1995 birth is not really done within the UK).

There has been a large effort by the person in question to remove this evidence from the internet, perhaps in an attempt to appear younger for the modelling industry. More recently he has also been trying to pass off a birth year of 1998 (to make himself 25), rather than 1995, so this is another change that may need a look out.

I understand the neccessity to ensure Wikipedia pages stay factual; I hope this clarifies the changes made, and also why citations for this become a little more challenging over time.

If there are any other questions I can answer, I am at your disposal :) 134.130.15.1 (talk) 11:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Ack, further addition to this of 134.130.15.1 (talk) 11:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC) of course!

@134.130.15.1134.130.15.1 Hello, Ok I no probelm but i was problems with you in past because you did not added Citing sources or reliable sources in Tommy Hatto but I happy you added a source but I don't think your provide link is prove Verifiability 's Tommy Hatto 's Birthday date.ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 11:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

That is understandable, and I can see why it is not an ideal source. As he is trying to remove all traces of his real age from the internet, can I also propose that he should provide reliable proof of being born in 1995 before it is changed to 1995 automatically? As this is something that cannot actually be done either, perhaps it is better to remove the date of birth from wiki altogether? 134.130.15.1 (talk) 14:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

@134.130.15.1 Yes it can happen but for this a discussion will have to be done on his talk to change his date of birth if you prove that his real date of birth is wrong here and there reliable source will have to be provided, if your point is proved to be true then the date of birth of the article will be changed.ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 15:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your recent removal of ProQuest thesis links

I have noticed that you had recently removed a link to a PhD thesis for Alan Shepard (academic) that is hosted on ProQuest via this diff but did not state a reason for this removal. Are you aware that PhD candidates at nearly all U.S. universities are required to submit a copy of their thesis to this company to make their thesis available at academic libraries at other universities? Are you also aware that ProQuest makes available downloadable PDF copies for free of theses submitted by recent U.S. PhD graduates to anyone who is physically located at a university that has a ProQuest subscription and if the thesis has not been digitized yet, create a link for the person physically at the academic library to request a copy via inter-library loan (either electronically or physically)?

I would like to see your reasoning behind this removal since you are unintentionally hindering persons who might want to access this publication. If you want to find out how academic libraries in the United States use ProQuest, I suggest contacting a librarian at an American university (or your university if you are located in the U.S. or possibly Canada). Thank you in advance. -- 108.71.214.235 (talk) 06:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

@108.71.214.235 Hello, I restore your Link on Alan Shepard (academic). –––ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 09:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

AFDs

Hello, Aviram7,

In several AFD deletion discussions, you have stated, "Speedy Delete". However, speedy deletion is a different process of deletion on Wikipedia, Criteria for Speedy Deletion. If you believe that an article fits one of the criteria for speedy deletion, you can tag it with an appropriate CSD tag. But saying "Speedy Delete" at an AFD discussion makes no sense with that deletion process. Stating a simple "Delete", along with your deletion rationale, is sufficient. Articles in an AFD are not speedily deleted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

@Liz Hello and Thank you for given me this information releated to WP:AFD, Kind regards –––ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 02:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Legend of the Octopus

May I kindly ask why you are reverting my edits? The plural form of “octopus” is “octopi” not “octopuses” (See also User talk:Layah50#Legend of the Octopus) 2601:204:C901:B740:11F6:F6AF:46A8:87DD (talk) 03:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

@:2601:204:C901:B740:11F6:F6AF:46A8:87DD Hello and Sorry for reverting your edit but We search on google and seem you're right and we are feel comfortable, so I've reverted the edit to your edits on Legend of the Octopus. Kind regards –––ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 03:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Andrew Parker Bowles and the 6th Earl of Macclesfield

I'm not very experienced in editing pages on Wikpedia, I just noticed an error and thought it needed to be fixed, so I have no idea how to refer to a source correctly. What I was talking about, in addition to Wikidata, it can also be checked here (https://thepeerage.com/p6962.htm#i69613, it seems to be frequently referenced on other pages, so it's probably considered a reliable source), in the family tree of Derek Parker Bowles, Andrew's father. Derek's father was Eustace Parker Bowles, born as just Eustace Parker in the family of his father, Algernon Parker, not Cecil Parker. So I hope maybe someone more experienced can add a source. 109.252.135.239 (talk) 20:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Signature

Hey, Aviram7! I like your signature! However, one thing-per WP:SIGIMAGE, images aren't allowed in signatures, so that'll have to be changed. Other than that, it's good! Tails Wx (they/them) 07:10, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

@Tails Wx Hello! and Thanks for given me this important information releated to WP:SIGIMAGE, now I'm removed image from our signature. Kind regards -- :) Âvîrâm7^(talk) 07:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Np! Thanks for doing so. :) Tails Wx (they/them) ⚧ 07:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

unable to login

Hello , I am unable to create my page 202.134.165.22 (talk) 12:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Ma’am Chief: Shakedown in Seoul

I don’t think there is a Manual style for it. Every movie titles in Wikipedia are always in italics what I did was right. Description not in italics are either a person, an object, or an animal. I hope you understood what I was saying. 120.28.249.138 (talk) 14:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Marina Manishi

Tell me where the source is for Marina Manishi being an action drama? The plot deals with theft, burglary, robbery, and these all come under crime. 136.54.56.86 (talk) 14:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

@136.54.56.86 Hello, I revert you edits on Marina Manishi due to you change some content from article but not providing reliable source, If you know according to Wikipedia policy If you change any content from article they anthing releated to the subject, so, providing reliable source of verification of your edit, your are true or not. I hope why I revert your edit you are understand, when next time you edit any article, then provide reliable source. Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

My Marcus Fernaldi Gideon edit

Hi Aviram, I noticed you reversed my edits on the "Personal life" segment of the Marcus Fernaldi Gideon page. All the links I used are from verified Indonesian media sites. I don't see why they would be deemed 'unreliable sources' since we're editing an Indonesian public media figure's page. Do let me know which parts do you consider 'unreliable' so I can get them fixed.

Thanks.

2001:448A:20B1:6CD7:20DA:2699:74C6:CF6C (talk) 06:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

My Chavo Guerrero edit

Hello! If you're curious, I'll try and find a link.The comic DOES exist, look it up. 104.226.193.186 (talk) 17:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Bobby R. Rich

Avarim, I don't know much about the hidden information, but I do know a lot about me!

I see you rejected a minor edit I did last evening.

I don't know what you changed, but it was either incorrect or no longer true.

Can you help me get my page back to correct info, please?

Bobby R. Rich 72.201.192.58 (talk) 18:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Unexplained revert

This is a garbage edit, please take more care in the future. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 12:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Please review my edit on the page sree narayana guru

Hi , can u please review my edits on the page sree narayana guru ? Wannabesomething123 (talk) 07:21, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

@Wannabesomething123: Hello, Sorry for late reply, Your edits are already accepted by another reviewers on Narayana Guru. Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 10:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, have a nice day :) Wannabesomething123 (talk) 14:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

SPIs

If you don't understand how SPIs work, then please don't edit them when you're running through your recent changes tasks. 2.49.39.17 (talk) 05:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

You edits those spi is closed in past and they archived by admin or checkuser on here.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

The old report is closed and waiting to be archived, new ones can be opened. This is done through the add report box on the SPI page. 2.49.39.17 (talk) 05:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for thanking me for my edit on Josh Jackson (basketball)! I was using Wikipedia to find information on two streaming serials on Apple+ when I saw the short list of pending edits. My favorite of the two is Invasion (2021 TV series). To me, It has the most international cast I have ever seen in a series produced by a US streaming company. Much more thoughtful than most science fiction.

Have a good editing session! — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 05:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC) —

Neonorange Hello, Well I think you never saw pending edit on Pending changes and you first saw time a short list of pending change. :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 06:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

G5, sockpuppetry

Hi! You've recently nominated a number of articles for speedy deletion as G5. You're perhaps not aware that that deletion criterion applies only when a blocked or banned editor returns under a different username or IP and creates a page. The user has to have been blocked at the moment the page was created. If a user is blocked, for whatever reason, that does automatically not make his/her article creations eligible for speedy deletion – unless the account was blocked for sockpuppetry, perhaps. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

@Justlettersandnumbers: Hello, Thanks for given me given this important information. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 02:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Thanks for reverting the radio spammer on my talk page. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 14:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

--WikiUser1234945-- Thanks a lot for grant me cheeseburger :)

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

taylor park

hey I added climate for Taylor Park rightfully cited by NOAA and you deleted it. Can you please let me add it 131.179.133.45 (talk) 01:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

@131.179.133.45 Hello, I reverted my edits from on Taylor Park. now, you no need to add those information renoved there because I revert my edits. :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 01:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

revert

Please undo your unexplained revert of me. I have made a second edit referencing the first which now makes no sense. 78.18.95.194 (talk) 01:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Kapil Returns

Err....the film meets WP: NFILM with 2+ reviews. Please can you revert your changes? Neutral Fan (talk) 12:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Just like how Draft: Anu Krishna also meets Wikipedia:Notability (people). Can you provide a little more notice with such moves, especially when changes via Draftify are so hard to get out of? Neutral Fan (talk) 12:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

@Neutral Fan: Hello, both articles is not indicates WP:GNG and In this film's and biography article are not present reliable source or Independent sources, please rectifying your article and add reliable sources, If you think I'm wrong, so, please submit button for reviewing, then an Afc reviewers reviews your draft, they seems your article is passing WP: NFILM then he accepting your article as soon possible. Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 12:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Main Zaroor Aaunga

The Times of India, Mumbai Mirror movie review reliable check Noticeboard Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard AShiv1212 (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC) Hi there, I saw that you deleted my contributions to the Members Only (hip-hop collective) page? I'd like to provide a source for my update, as this page has notoriously not been updated well with incorrect facts and a lack of members. https://www.reddit.com/r/XXXTENTACION/comments/aha7io/list_of_members_onlys_members/ This Reddit post goes into great detail and provides concise evidence from tweets, photos, etc. of official join and leave dates for every member of the group. This post has not been updated since the end of 2018 though, and so I am also adding and removing members that left during the year 2019. Hope this helps and I hope you revert the change! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:243:C600:6A40:24B4:4884:A646:C5DD (talk) 04:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Deleted Talk Page Message

Hi,

I recently left a message on the Talk page of another user inviting them to open a discussion about an article they'd edited. You deleted my invitation. Could you explain why?

Thank you, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 16:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Jean-de-Nivelle Hello, and sorry for late reply, I was reverted your edits by mistake; I apology for about that. Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 02:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for the response. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

new mentor....

Hi, Aviram!

Apparently you're my new mentor. I didn't know I had one until the last one retired!

Thanks! Bruckner (talk) 08:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Bruckner Hello, I nice to meet you, Well! I will be happy to help you, if you need my help then contact me immediately;I accepting your invitation, thanks for informing me on my talkpage. Happy editing :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 10:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi How are you!

Who are you I hope. That you will be fine. I have about 8 years of experience on this wikipedia. The one who tries to delete the page is the page which has already been created by some big ad. That will be acceptable. And no matter how small the editor is, no matter how famous he is, the page created by this editor will not be acceptable on Wikipedia. Thank you So help me in this work. So I will be grateful to you. Roundex (talk) 08:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

@Roundex: I don't understand what kind of question is this? Who are you? And That you will be okay, sounds like a threat to me? Sorry, we cannot help you as I have some other urgent work and the article you are talking about seems to me to be a clear promotion.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 09:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

No bro. That page is not made by me, that page is made by a very big editor, I just came to update it. Roundex (talk) 09:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Roundex:. Your account was only created two weeks ago. Which account have you been editing with for eight years? Wikishovel (talk) 09:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes, sir, I have created this account. The page that I edited after a while was completely perfect Roundex (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

@Wikishovel, If their account was created two weeks ago, I believe they might be account of an blocked Sockpuppet account? What do you think about this topic? Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 09:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

No brother. He is a senior Wikipedia. User:ساجد امجد ساجد Roundex (talk) 09:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

@Roundex: which account have YOU been using for eight years? Wikishovel (talk) 10:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Aviram7, in case you're interested, Roundex has been blocked and globally locked for sockpuppetry. Wikishovel (talk) 05:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Wikishovel: Thanks for informing me about Roundex case. Thnx :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 06:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit

Yes you have made a mistake. This is news that was launched today. Please verify your sources before you erase my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:4EFA:E901:4D6F:4BB4:BA8:C53E (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

@2A00:23C4:4EFA:E901:4D6F:4BB4:BA8:C53E Hello, Your edit has been reverted because you was adding unsourced content on Daniel Vallverdú, please refain to adding unsourced content on article and try to adding or providing reliable source for verification. ~~ αvírαm-αlt|(tαlk) 13:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your AfC reviews

I have noticed that you recently declined several AfC submissions with default decline reasons. Among them, two drafts that you declined today, Anveshi (2023 film) and Ishaan Dhawan, seem to be notable under WP:NFILM and WP:NACTOR, respectively. Therefore, I have accepted these. Could you please explain the reasons for declining these two? I believe it would be helpful for editors to improve the drafts if you could suggest improvements along with the decline reason. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer: Hello, firstly, I declined Anveshi (2023 film), due to I saw in reception section, The film is got mixed review with negatives review, but and I open few link they diagain.open and they link not seem reliable source. and other things I dont see any other newspaper source like, aajtak, Dainik jagran, amar ujjala, navbhart times etc, other newspaper are not too notable or reliable, sometime, newspaper only print good review of an film, only for it's promotion., That's why I felt it was right to accept this film now and I was rejected it.Tthnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

The submission named Ishaan Dhawan was declined because he has acted in the lead role in only two serials, I think this does not prove that an actor is notable., although I think there should be some improvement in it, so maybe I would not have declined this but would have left a comment, and other afc reviewers do with their discretion, it was not right for me to declined, some topics are very notable, but due to lack of reliable sources they are declined or removed. Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 12:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't think you understand English Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and you also seem unaware of how both of these articles are notable under WP:NFILM and WP:NACTOR SNGs. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer:, I am aware of Wikipedia's Notability policy, although I have probably read WP:NACTOR and WP:NFILM correctly, although I need to understand them again.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 12:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Article

Yesterday, my drafted article Swami Avdheshanand Giri Ji Maharaj was accepted and was rated B-class. Will this rating increase and how to increase it? TheProEditor11 (talk) 04:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

@TheProEditor11: Hello, Those rating is given on the base of article quality and it's writing it's importants; please see WP:ARTASS for more information.you if too improve article,and make article too better and improve also it's quality, so you can increase it's rating .Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for sharing the detail! Regards - TheProEditor11 (talk) 05:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Philip Ikeazor

Hi. I have just been looking at this article, which you recently promoted from draft to article space. The wording was highly promotional. I at first attempted to salvage it, but found that it was impossible, so I've deleted it. I thought you should be aware of this. Deb (talk) 14:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

@Deb Hello, recently I declined this submission was as WP:COPYVIO and I've also tagged for deletion this submission was and an admin was remove copyright content from this submission,I didn't know this submission was promotional, sorry for about that and Thank for informing me about that, I will be very aware of this in the future . Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

No worries. We all have to start somewhere. Deb (talk) 14:50, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

AFC

Sorry for any rush if you meant to get around to it, but since you've started to accept and reject other articles in the meantime I thought it would be fine to remind you that you started reviewing my submission. Thanks! PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

@PARAKANYAA Hello, I've going to reviewing your submission at this time, please still waiting until when I not accepted or decline your submission. Thanks for your patience. :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

@PARAKANYAA I've accepted your submission, Thank for you participated in WP:AFC. :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 06:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

@Aviram7 Thank you for reviewing it :) PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Reviewing

It's good that you are trying to help with this, but I'd recommend that, where you are unsure about whether a draft should be promoted to mainspace, you leave it alone and try reviewing other drafts that are less problematic. There's no rule that says you have to review every one that's waiting for review. Deb (talk) 15:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Deb:, Ok I will keep your thoughts in our mind, thank you for given me this suggest.Thnx :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Political Repression in India

Hello Aviram7, How does Political Repression in India meets WP:N? This seems like an essay expressing personal views. I've noticed you're accepting or declining drafts solely based on source counts, without evaluating the content of the articles. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer Hello, I don't accept articles like this, rather I read the contents of the article carefully, and try to understand them and search about that topic on Google, if I think the topic is worthy of being on Wikipedia and the topic is worthy of being on Wikipedia. Only if the author follows and will follow the policies of I.I., I accept that author and before that I check his copyright, if the subject is copyrighted then I immediately nominate it for deletion, I have told you before also, all human beings Thinking is different, I would like to ask you a question, why are the policies on Wikipedia written by God or by humans? All the articles on Wikipedia that have been written by a good human being, just seem to be people's perspective of seeing, understanding and thinking, so it is obvious that if a poet does not put his words into poetry, then how will the poem be made, whatever you say. I understand what you want, however you can see other articles related to this topic in this .Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't understand what you are saying. If you are evaluating other users' work, you must adhere to the relevant guidelines. I recall a few days ago when SilverLocust questioned your page mover right, and you mentioned that everyone makes mistakes. Now, you seem to be giving similar excuses again. What do you mean by 'why are the policies on Wikipedia written by God or by humans?' Your responses are unclear to me, perhaps you're using some sort of translation software. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer: No, I never using translation software, I only saying Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and everyone have right to write them, and wikipedian are those people who writes wikipedia and it's policy, we respect all policies of wikipedian, sorry for about that, I think I'm not Qualified to make an afc reviewers, I try to something new , but.... Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I am trying to assume good faith, but I've noticed recurring mistakes in your reviews. While it's appreciated that you're helping with AfC, I'd suggest reviewing only the submissions you feel confident about assessing. It might be helpful to revisit the guidelines before conducting reviews. – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer: Ok! I will do try to rectifying our such mistake these mistake are not make again and I will be memorising your thoughts before reviewing submission.Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

draft:Needy Foundation

Thank you for your suggestion about Needy Foundation Md Shahedul Alam Khan (talk) 17:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Aviram7. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Dear @HJ Mitchell: Thank you for given me this opportunity. Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, Aviram7,

Please be more careful in deciding when it is appropriate to tag a page for speedy deletion along with the criteria you use. I just saw a User page that said simply "Hello" and you requested deletion because you judged it to be a hoax. Huh? How is "Hello" a hoax article? There is no reason this page should be tagged for any type of deletion.

I'm concerned that you just were given New page reviewer privileges if this is the kind of decisions you are making. Please review WP:CSD thoroughly. Please know that pages should only be tagged for deletion if they qualify for a speedy deletion criteria, not just because you might judge them to be useless or funny or not making a contribution to the project. There has to be a legitimate reason why they should be deleted. You're not getting points for each page you tag, it's the quality of your judgment, not the quantity of tagged pages that matter. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Liz: Hello, Thank you for informing me, sorry for about, I don't make mistake like this future, I carefully in future. Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 03:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Draft:War 2 (2025 film)

War 2 (2025 film) started filming and has a release date Pleae move it to the Article page from draft page Tarun Joga 38 (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Scott_Liddell

Hi - I wonder if you could explain why you rejected this page as non notable? it contains multiple RS references to someone who has carried (a) annual official photography lectures at one of the most famous and influential universities in the world, (b) has a significant following in the world of photography, such that he has been discussed on several occasions, including article specifically about his work, in the press and has had a solo exhibition in an art gallery, and (c) is an award winner for his photographic work?

What, in your opinion, is missing from the article?

Many thanks for your time. StuartDouglas (talk) 19:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

@StuartDouglas: Hello, Sorry for late reply and I rejected your submission for this reason. I think if he win accolades in photography contest in university and else where, I suggest you please added more reliable source with better content and also mention his honours on your submission and but please bear in your mind those sources clearly indicate notability about that person, please see WP:PHOTOGRAPHER. Thnx :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

HI, yes I saw that was the reason, but almost every source there is from an RS, and contains both links to the award he won (from the awarding body), a study of his work on Edinburgh Live (an RS linked to the Scotsman newspaper) and The Edinburgh Reporter, a respected Scottish RS news site, multiple links to Edinburgh City Council websites, a link to the art gallery which hosted his exhibition, demonstrating that the exhibition took place recently.

I'm not clear what further RS you expect? There are 12 links on the page, of which 10 are to independent, peer reviewed websites. Advice would be much appreciated. StuartDouglas (talk) 15:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Request for re-review

If you re-review S M Jahid Hasan (Politician) the news source given is the website Google News aproble. Now you consider. But I think it should not be rejected Rana wikibio (talk) 14:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Rana wikibio, Hello, sorry If any submission is rejected is in first phase, they Afc reviewer are not able to re-review this submission, and we I've was lefted the reason of rejection on your draft submission.Thnx :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Bhagabhai Dhanabhai Barad

I mistakenly failed to give you a notification of draft-acceptance. zoglophie^•talk• 15:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Zoglophie: Hello, Don't worries, I'm also afc reviewers and i understand your feeling, I think you can add accepting template on my Usertalkpage. Thnx :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

and thanks for accepted my article, this my first article. Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Zoglophie: I think if you add submission accepted template on my Usertalkpage, so I feel very happy,plesae try it manuallly? When I was created this article, I don't understand how to gone submission acceptance message on other usertalk.😔 Thnx ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhagabhai Dhanabhai Barad has been accepted

Bhagabhai Dhanabhai Barad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

zoglophie^•talk• 15:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jivabhai Motibhai Damor has been accepted

Jivabhai Motibhai Damor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sitaram Aadivashi has been accepted

Sitaram Aadivashi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yogendrasinh Parmar has been accepted

Yogendrasinh Parmar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 11:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arjunsinh Udesinh Chauhan has been accepted

Arjunsinh Udesinh Chauhan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 13:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalubhai Rupabhai Dabhi has been accepted

Kalubhai Rupabhai Dabhi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 05:58, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurveer Singh has been accepted

Gurveer Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 06:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ganeshraj Bansal has been accepted

Ganeshraj Bansal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 06:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dharmpal has been accepted

Dharmpal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ramavatar Bairwa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ramavatar Bairwa. Thanks! Timothytyy (talk) 10:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhajan Lal Sharma has been accepted

Bhajan Lal Sharma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 11:12, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your work at AfC! <3 QuantumRealm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 11:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @QuantumRealm: Thank you for this Barnaster,:) Thnx ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome. I noticed that your recent articles contain grammatical errors. Feel free to ping me if you need help with editing to ensure they are grammatically correct. Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 11:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @QuantumRealm: Thank you, When I created article next time, then i will ping you. :) Thnx ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @QuantumRealm: Hello, I created Draft:Pratap Singh Singhvi, can you help me rectifying grammar :) Thnx ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

I don't see any grammatical errors in this one. Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 14:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @QuantumRealm: Thanks for reply, well, can you accepted this draft? :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Oops! Looks like it has already been accepted. Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 14:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @QuantumRealm: I'm created Draft:Surendra Singh Rathore and Draft:Kailash Chand Verma and Draft:Devendra Joshi and I've now submitted for review, I hope you accepting immediately. Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramavatar Bairwa has been accepted

Ramavatar Bairwa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratap Singh Singhvi has been accepted

Pratap Singh Singhvi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 14:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kesaram Choudhary has been accepted

Kesaram Choudhary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 16:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radheyshayam Bairwa has been accepted

Radheyshayam Bairwa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 16:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jethanand Vyas has been accepted

Jethanand Vyas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anshuman Singh Bhati has been accepted

Anshuman Singh Bhati, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 05:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram Singh Jakhal has been accepted

Vikram Singh Jakhal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 06:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Margin

Hello, I noticed in your recent political-related articles that you're referring to the total votes as the margin. For instance, in your article, Vikram Singh Jakhal, you mentioned 112,037 votes as the margin. However, those 112,037 votes represent the total votes received by Vikram Singh Jakhal. The actual margin should be 23,180 because Vikram Singh Jakhal got 112,037 votes, while the runner-up, Rajkumar Sharma, received 88,857 votes, resulting in a difference of 23,180 votes. Just to clarify, in the context of voting, the margin typically signifies the difference between the votes received by two candidates, rather than the total votes received by the winning candidate. – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

@QuantumRealm, Please carefully review the submissions for any factual errors before accepting them. – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

My bad, I was focused more on grammatical errors, as their numbers were correct in the previous submissions, I will be careful next time. Thank you! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 09:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harlal Saharan has been accepted

Harlal Saharan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 09:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surendra Singh Rathore has been accepted

Surendra Singh Rathore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 13:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devendra Joshi has been accepted

Devendra Joshi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kailash Chand Verma has been accepted

Kailash Chand Verma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Shailesh Singh has been accepted

Dr. Shailesh Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaluram Meghwal has been accepted

Kaluram Meghwal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

─ The Aafī (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heeralal Nagar has been accepted

Heeralal Nagar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 06:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lalaram Bairwa has been accepted

Lalaram Bairwa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 06:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jhabar Singh Kharra has been accepted

Jhabar Singh Kharra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 13:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Help with citations

Hi Aviram - you recently rejected my article submission, and Im at a loss how to address the issue.

"...submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article"

Can you help me with some good examples of a citation?

Jah98000 (talk) 14:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laxmanram Meghwal has been accepted

Laxmanram Meghwal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Siddhanth_Lohia

Hi. As suggested, I have removed the YouTube and Instagram links on the page Done: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Siddhanth_Lohia

Since the last time the page submission was declined on 7-Nov-2023, I have added two additional sources/citations from ChessChest.com and ChessArena.com.

Hopefully now the page has enough independent and reliable citations.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sulohia (talk • contribs)

Dear @Sulohia: Hello ,Thank you for creating those article from WP:AFC process,but I already comment on the draft submission you created,but I will do contact to another Afc reviewer to review your draft submission immedieatly.Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 06:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Captain Mohamed Nazim

Hi,

Can you please explain to be under which rule this link was draftfied.

Draft:Mohamed Nazim

Also is one of many links (one referenced) in article clearly mentions the person and also it one of many major news sources in the country with the news on him.

https://psmnews.mv/en/119795

https://raajje.mv/134165

In the headline to news its about the person. So how does this work, and here is ur message in the article.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Thanks Existence Leesaaisath 09:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Leesaaisath: Hello,sorry for late reply, I've declined you're submission was due to this reason and I think you Draft submission are not meets WP:BLP yet.

I saw you reference but they are not seem reliable and subject are not recieve more WP:SIGCOV yet.

I suggest to you please add high popular media, like - news channels, newspaper and magazine also, but if any media taked a interview of the subject, then you add those media's reliable source who take interview to this subject.Thx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 12:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

This is Maldives sphere and their major news sources. Thats why I have put links from them. The subject specific (captain mohamed Nazim) is on all major news sources in Maldives.

Now how do we justify as popular/covered? Im getting confused on how to rationalize this now. I mean basically all news sources have covered him and its seen in basic search with Captain Mohamed Nazim.

Im putting attention on this since, its going to be problem if we are judge on this way of coverage. I have put up many articles based on this coverage already too and approved. Existence Leesaaisath 14:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Raajje MV

PSM (National Media)

Ras.MV

Sun Online

MBR

These are major sources of Maldives we have and subject specific if you check the articles. Existence Leesaaisath 14:55, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.

https://raajje.mv/134165

https://ras.mv/en/post/5265

https://ammari.mv/the-executive-committee/

https://mbt.mv/mss-appoints-captain-mohamed-nazim-as-new-md/

https://archive.mv/en/articles/wVVrRD

Explain to me how this is not covering this person? I would like to learn Existence Leesaaisath 14:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

Please identify to me how these links are not showing significant coverage. Thanks Existence Leesaaisath 16:38, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sukharam Netdiya has been accepted

Sukharam Netdiya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 15:33, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Govind Prasad has been accepted

Govind Prasad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

zoglophie^•talk• 14:22, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Minor Edits

Hi Aviram7,

When you are marking edits as minor make sure they are actually minor. I have noticed where you mark edits such as this one and this one as minor. They most definitely are not minor edits and it is considered generally poor practice to mark such edits as minor. Just a heads up. Best, Seawolf35 ^T--C 16:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Seawolf35: Hello, Thank you informing me about that, I think I marked this edit as minor edit was by mistake,We will do try to rectifying them. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 01:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samaram Garasiya has been accepted

Samaram Garasiya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 06:35, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dharmraj Singh Yadav has been accepted

Dharmraj Singh Yadav, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 12:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Can you explain how you decided to tag Civil Hospital Nawabshah as A11? This hospital is obviously not made up. You were previously advised by Liz about taking more care in tagging for speedy deletion. Please rad and understand the criteria for speedy deletion before you apply speedy deletion tags. -- Whpq (talk) 14:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Whpq: Hello, I should have nominated this article for speedy deletion under different criteria, but I tagged for deletion under the wrong criteria, Thanks you for informing me, I full care will be taken to ensure that such error does not happen again.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

What speedy criteria do you think applied? -- Whpq (talk) 15:47, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

I think this article applied for deletion as WP:A7 under the criteria of speedy deletion because a hospital may or may not be government, but it is counted as an institution, or when it appears that If no criteria can be applied then you should resort to WP:AFD, please forgive if there is any mistake in describing it.😊 ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Why do you think A7 applies? Whpq (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

because Hospital is an institutions and in the WP:A7 creteria are mentioned institutions. A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events), so, I think this A7 is applies on there. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:33, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Why do you believe there is no inducation of importance? -- Whpq (talk) 16:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

I think this article is not notable , I don't have any reason why I think so, sorry, but we don't want to talk about it further.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

I am sorry for jumping in, but if you think this subject isn't notable, why did you mark it as reviewed? – DreamRimmer (talk) 04:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @DreamRimmer: Hello, Thank you for asking this question, When I'm tagging for deletion this page by twinkle then he was automatically marked as reviewed, I already asked this question to another User's talkpage. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

This isn't the best course of action—to mark CSDed pages as reviewed—so you should consider changing your Twinkle preferences. I've gone ahead and marked this one as unreviewed. Your previous statement, 'I think this article is not notable, I don't have any reason why I think so, sorry, but we don't want to talk about it further,' isn't the expected response from an NPP. As we've discussed previously, you're responsible for your actions and must be able to provide reasoning for them. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear@DreamRimmer:,This problem occurred accidentally, but I have fixed the problem. As for the notability of that page, I did not find it notable, I nominated it for speedy deletion under the wrong criteria, that was also an error. , I remember what you told me earlier and I am constantly trying to learn something from you to work on Wikipedia.

If I had not ended the conversation there, I might have got into an argument with that Administrator and since I was busy elsewhere at the time, I decided to end the discussion, for which I am sorry.😊 ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 08:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

That makes sense, but repeated mistakes aren't a good sign for someone holding advanced permissions. Have a great day! – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Just to note that A7 is not about notability. It is actually a much lower bar. The article need only make a credible claim of importance to be exempt from A7. -- Whpq (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

:(

Can you please tell me how to get sandbox mode thing :/ :3 •_• 😾😾😾😾😾 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooperturton (talk • contribs) 10:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Satish Chandra Sharma (politician) has been accepted

Satish Chandra Sharma (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 17:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Wrt to comments on Draft:Chimaji Jadhav

Could you explain/expand on your concerns at Draft:Chimaji Jadhav? Why do you think the book references are not enough ? Sohom (talk) 12:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

@Sohom Datta:Hello, I did not say that the references are the book were not sufficient, but what I meant to say I looking at the references presented in that book to find information related to the topic, but I could not find any information on that topic.I was not able to see what was found in the book and hence I neither accepted nor rejected that submission, only commented, if possible give references elsewhere so that the significance of the subject can be ascertained.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Request on 15:01:55, 11 December 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Aimjfindia786

• Aimjfindia786 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Aimjfindia786/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Aimjfindia786 (talk) 15:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aimjfindia786 (talk • contribs)

@Aimjfindia786: Hello, You're submission seem like as promotion or adversting of an person or organization, I suggest you to , firstly re-written your submission who make an better article, please see WP:FIRST and you are n't provide reliable source, like- Primary source, Secondary source, Independent source as who clearly indicates subject's notability probably.I hope you understand my talk make better your submission .😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

ok Noted Aimjfindia786 (talk) 12:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Draft Review

Hi, As you Suggested i have Removed the IMDb links for the Page - Draft:VJ Sunny .

Hopefully now the page has enough independent and reliable citations, Requesting you to Please Review the Page.

Thankyou! Mr.shaikmeer (talk) 15:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

@Mr.shaikmeer I declined your submission because sone sources are seem unreliable and I don't think they meets WP:NACTOR. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 17:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Requesting for Page Review

Dear @Aviram7, Requesting you to Please Review this Page Draft:Dwaraka Creations

Thankyou! Mr.shaikmeer (talk) 16:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

@Mr.shaikmeer:, Hello, I've checked few reference they seem good but I cannot accepted this submission, please wait until when other Afc reviewers are not review your submission. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 17:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear Aviram7 Hello, The page got declined, Reviewer has not mentioned any comment.

Made few changes and added some References for the same, Requesting you to please Review the Page.

Thankyou! Mr.shaikmeer (talk) 17:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

@Mr.shaikmeer: I declined your submission because production and filmography section are seems like as empty. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Aviram7 I have Made the changes suggested by you, Coming to Filmography section, The Production House Produced 4 films for that i have Included the Movie names also presented in the Wikipedia. Therefore included the Reference articles in the Filmography!

so, you can accepted this submission Draft:Dwaraka Creations Mr.shaikmeer (talk) 06:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Aviram7, Requesting you to please look into this!

Thankyou! Mr.shaikmeer (talk) 09:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do the needful Aviram7 ! Mr.shaikmeer (talk) 11:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

@Mr.shaikmeer: Please don't bother me to accept this draft submission, I noticed you've already requested a draft review on other user's talk page, I'd like to see what they think of your submission.If they provide positive feedback about your submission, I will consider accepting your draft submission as soon as possible. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramakesh Nishad has been accepted

Ramakesh Nishad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 16:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaswant Singh Saini has been accepted

Jaswant Singh Saini, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 09:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vijay Laxmi Gautam has been accepted

Vijay Laxmi Gautam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Help

How to add images to Wikipedia article?like example: to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kyunki_Saas_Bhi_Kabhi_Bahu_Thi.jpg#mw-jump-to-license ReftLogs(talk) 05:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear@ReftLogs: Hello, Firstly copy those file name -ex -File:Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi.jpgthen you add That file who article you like|image=File:Kyunki_Saas_Bhi_Kabhi_Bahu_Thi.jpgand publish you edit by written summary then you see our file has been successfully added in the article, but this file is already added by other in the releated article. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 06:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

thanks, how to upload new image file? ReftLogs (talk) 04:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear@ReftLogs:, please upload file on Wikimedia Commons. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 06:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Paltu Ram has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Paltu Ram. Thanks! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:22, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Paltu Ram has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Paltu Ram. Thanks! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 20:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paltu Ram has been accepted

Paltu Ram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphan template removal

I have added links to OSRMT (software) from other Wikipedia articles. Can I remove orphan template from top of the article? Mukarram (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello. If you aren't too busy

Hello. If you arent too busy, do review article Patricia Lamanna. Cheers.. Wallclockticking (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Wallclockticking: Hello, and  Done 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 06:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Shoshana Nambi

Hello, Aviram7,

You tagged this page for speedy deletion but you never posted a notification to the page creator alerting them to what problems you saw in the article and why it was tagged for deletion. Please use Twinkle to tag pages for deletion, it's the most complete and easy-to-use tool and set your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator" (it's a box that should be checked off) and then Twinkle will post these notices on your behalf. It's really important to let content creators know why articles might be deleted so that they can avoid problems in the future. THank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

@Liz: Thank you for let me know about that. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 08:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ved Prakash Gupta has been accepted

Ved Prakash Gupta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sitaram Verma has been accepted

Sitaram Verma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 13:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Request to review BasiGo draft

Hello I would like to request if you could review a draft I created a few weeks back Draft:BasiGo. It was already reviewed but declined by another administrator. After making appropriate edits I resubmitted but the admin refused to review again citing they don't review the same article twice, despite it being valid. Here is the exchange User talk:Seawolf35#BasiGo draft. It has been almost a week now and I am not really sure where to go now. I hope this is not putting you of in any way if so I sincerely apologize. Otherwise I would really appreciate if you could review. Thank you. Serrwinner (talk) 17:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

@Serrwinner: Hello, your draft submission looks fine to me, but if you would like a quick review of your article, although I cannot review your draft right now for some personal problems, you can make an request to review on here.those editors who replying there who much more experience than me answer questions related to WP:AFC. I am sure and hope that they will definitely help you.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 03:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the help pal, cheers Serrwinner (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gopal Sharma (politician) has been accepted

Gopal Sharma (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dcotos (talk) 09:14, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Aviram7. Thank you for your work on Gopal Sharma (politician). Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, Aviram7 Nice work!, Thank you for your contribution, cheers!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaydeep Bihani has been accepted

Jaydeep Bihani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 15:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from B matlhase on Linda Sebezo (20:30, 21 December 2023)

Hello I want to start a page of Linda sebezo of which does not exist, what can I do? --B matlhase (talk) 20:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

@B matlhase Hello, If that page is not present on Wikipedia, then you can create it, you just have to search by writing the name of that article in the search box given above, if the article is created then you will see that article created in blue color or It may also redirect from related page sometimes , but if the article has not been created, it will appear in red next to the search box and you will be asked to create that page if you wish to create them, Please see WP:FIRST for how to create an article.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)

Please see Linda Sebezo. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 01:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Review

Hello, Please Review my Draft Draft:Purnima (TV series) ,Draft:Nikki Aur Jadui Bubble (TV series) and Draft:Sasumaa Ne Meri Kadar Na Jaani that I created a few weeks back.Thanks 2409:4071:6E0C:9F3E:0:0:EF48:A90E (talk) 04:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

@2409:4071:6E0C:9F3E:0:0:EF48:A90E Hello, sorry for late reply but I take more time to review your following draft if possible because there are 687 currently pending submission are awaiting for review.Thank you for your keep patience . 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:40, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Wrt to recent creations

Hey! I recently unreviewed a bunch of your creations since you appeared to be using unreliable sources. Please note, that sites like election.in and oneindia.com other such mirrors of election results are generally considered unreliable. Also, I personally would refrain from using WP:TOI outside of routine coverage in politics due to there being a consensus that their reporting is generally unreliable and they tend to favour the ruling party. Sohom (talk) 11:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

User:Ethan101 Traveler/sandbox

Hello, Aviram7,

You wrote on this User page that editors are not allowed to write about themselves. That's not true. Autobiographies are highly discouraged but this is not a reason for deletion unless the content is advertising or promotional which this is not. We have many articles from the early days of Wikipedia where the article subject created their own article. I'm not saying that this page shouldn't be deleted, I just don't want you to give out statements like this to inexperienced editors that have no basis in Wikipedia policy. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

@Dear Liz Hello, I support your thoughts, basically I don't says other new and old editors are not authority to create own userpage but they can't write article on himself, I fully against about that, because Since last many We hearning more editors says "these sentences "Wikipedia editors are not right to create article himself on Wikipedia", but I clearly known the subject is not notable, so, then I rejected that submission, thank you for let me known about this topic, next time I try to adding other points for this topic. Marry Christmas to you and Happy new year also. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 06:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Request for Re-Reviewing

Hi, I request you to please review my draft again as i have fixed the errors Homolego (talk) 18:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Homolego, Hello, firstly please you sumbit for review your draft, then I'm able to approved them. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 02:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 144 reviews, for a total of 144 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky (talk) 06:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Robertsky: Hello, Thank you for this greetings,I will pray to God that the New Year 2024 brings a lot of good, fun and happiness for you too.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 08:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasonal greetings!!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Aviram7, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 08:33, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 08:33, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Akshadev: Hello, Thank you for this greetings,I will pray to God that the New Year 2024 brings a lot of good, fun and happiness for you too.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 08:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

A couple of recent AFC acceptances

This is just fyi. I will not name the editor here. please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khan tabrez. I am not commenting on the actual acceptance; socks often produce valid articles. When you see anything to do with Anjum Lucknowi in an editor's edit history, be suspicious and please consider filing an additional SPI in this thread 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Timtrent: Hello, Sorry for about that! What I wrong? But really I don't know they are sockpuppet of khan tabrez, before accepting those draft, all things I've checked and then I was accepted these draft.I apologizes to you for about that. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 09:13, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Heavens no, no need to apologise. It takes a while to start to recognise socks. Until we recognise them, even until the SPI proves them to be socks, we assume good faith, which is precisely what you have done. The acceptances were fine.

All I wanted to do was to gave you more information. That will help you in the future. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @Timtrent: Thank you for let me know for about that. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)

I'm sure you will be interested in the outcome of the investigation. We have caught four confirmed sock puppets, which is always a good thing to do. This investigation has now been archived as you will see when you go there. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

@Timtrent: Hello, Thank you for notifying from this investigation's result, nice to listen they confirmed and blocked as sock! 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello

I hope this message finds you in good health. Do review Ellise. Cheers.

PS Its part of my Wikipedia Women red link to blue project contributions.

Wallclockticking (talk) 18:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

@Wallclockticking Hello, Sorry for late reply, but I'm not feel comfortable to review this article.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Could you help me improve a Wikipedia draft?

The draft is from a musician. Draft:Jose Julian Soberanis 187.252.199.216 (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Season's greetings

~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

Hello Aviram7: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear @CAPTAIN RAJU: Hello, Thank you and same to you.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 21:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank U

Thank u bro 59.97.40.237 (talk) 09:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Bro please accept Ayodhya Anand Vihar Terminal Vande Bharat Express article to mainspace it's in now request from draft. Please bro accept it. 59.97.40.237 (talk) 09:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

@59.97.40.237 Hello, no way, why do you think I'm would go for accepting another Draft submission whose are not ready for mainspace? there is no need to accepted this draft if they are not suitable for Wikipedia at this time. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 12:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Drafts for review

Hello can please you review my articles and see if they are worthy to be included in Wikipedia. These articles meet all general notability requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia and that they are separate languages with their Iso codes and reference codes and names. Here they are. They are also not redirects as Anomie bot and Rober Mclennon only added redirects based on similar names but they are totally different language articles that I have created with information verified and reliable. Here they are. Thank you. [[4]], [[5]], [[6]], [[7]], [[8]], [[9]], [[10]], [[11]], [[12]] 2600:1700:2F01:CDC0:CDB:CEB6:91A7:23BB (talk) 15:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

@2600:1700:2F01:CDC0:CDB:CEB6:91A7:23BB Hello, We don't review draft submission on request because There are 595 pending submissions waiting for review and I don't review submission in specific order, I've marked your request as  Not done .😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from AlishaSmithMGMT22 on Sky-Map.org (17:59, 27 December 2023)

Hello,

My name is Alisha K. Smith and I just enrolled in this today (12/27/23). I am very excited as I love to learn and especially write. I also have a wealth of knowledge that I have learned through my lifetime of experience and guidance from mentors. --AlishaSmithMGMT22 (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

@AlishaSmithMGMT22: Hello, Welcome to Wikipedia! Which kind of help you need from me? 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Aviram7. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell: Hello, Thank you for given me second opportunity to review article, I assure you I solve those problems releated to G11 and G12.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Question from AlishaSmithMGMT22 on Cis-Lunar (22:02, 27 December 2023)

Hello,

I’m trying to complete the first edit task. I select an option then it says, “tap pencil icon”. But the icon is not appearing on my iPhone. Do I need to do this on a different device?

Thank you,

Alisha --AlishaSmithMGMT22 (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

@AlishaSmithMGMT22: Which kind of device you using for editing on Wikipedia? please see WP:HOW for more information, I hope you completing your first task successfully after reading my suggested topic. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:WilliamNFlowers/sandbox

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:WilliamNFlowers/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Aviram7,

You posted your AFC review after I deleted the page so you were down as the page creator. I redeleted it. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Amit Patkar

I saw the article and moved it to draft myself, before you accepted the draft. As i understood the WP:NPOL, the subject isn’t notable and he is just a state president of a national party. If the subject is notable, so every party do give that particular post to local politicians also, every state in India has president of different parties. Kindly let me know. Thanks — Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 09:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

@QuadriOnMobile: Hello, No! He is a state president of Congress of goa, and I don't think why they not meet WP:NPOL and president is a post and he is president on national party, so, I accepted this submission. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 10:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer can you Guidance me please about this topic? 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 10:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

National Spokesperson pages also got deleted before after going through AfD. Hope you understand. Why you accepted it within 10-15 minutes of submission, you should consult another editor if you don’t understand the guidelines. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 10:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

It doesn't meet NPOL. State presidents of political parties must meet the GNG or ANYBIO criteria for a standalone article. I have marked it as unreviewed. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

@QuadriOnMobile: Hmmm.. I understand about that! Thank you for given me this suggestion, but I understand this guidelines, I accepted this submission only due to President of Indian National Congress, Goa, before accepting this, I've searched on google and they received to WP:SIGCOV. but If you think I make something wrong, so, I apolized to you. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer Thank for your reply, What should I do next? please let me know?thank you for marked as unreviewed!😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)