August 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Appeal

edit

 
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Wallclockticking (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Firstly, I would like to admit I was using 2 accounts.

Secondly, I want to apologize sincerely and confirm that I disobeyed Wikipedia guidelines.

Lastly, I want to state that it was never my intention to misuse or abuse multiple accounts, disobey the regulations or to cause any confusion within the community.

I created the seconnd due to an issue with my phone, and because of that I was unable to access my account and, in the moment, I used another account to continue contributing until I got my phone repaired. I realize now that this may have violated Wikipedia’s guidelines.

I know I did wrong and deserve penalties. Please show leniency.

Wallclockticking (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Firstly, I would like to admit I was using 2 accounts. Secondly, I want to apologize sincerely and confirm that I disobeyed Wikipedia guidelines. Lastly, I want to state that it was never my intention to misuse or abuse multiple accounts, disobey the regulations or to cause any confusion within the community. I created the seconnd due to an issue with my phone, and because of that I was unable to access my account and, in the moment, I used another account to continue contributing until I got my phone repaired. I realize now that this may have violated Wikipedia’s guidelines. I know I did wrong and deserve penalties. Please show leniency. [[User:Wallclockticking|Wallclockticking]] ([[User talk:Wallclockticking#top|talk]]) 01:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Firstly, I would like to admit I was using 2 accounts. Secondly, I want to apologize sincerely and confirm that I disobeyed Wikipedia guidelines. Lastly, I want to state that it was never my intention to misuse or abuse multiple accounts, disobey the regulations or to cause any confusion within the community. I created the seconnd due to an issue with my phone, and because of that I was unable to access my account and, in the moment, I used another account to continue contributing until I got my phone repaired. I realize now that this may have violated Wikipedia’s guidelines. I know I did wrong and deserve penalties. Please show leniency. [[User:Wallclockticking|Wallclockticking]] ([[User talk:Wallclockticking#top|talk]]) 01:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Firstly, I would like to admit I was using 2 accounts. Secondly, I want to apologize sincerely and confirm that I disobeyed Wikipedia guidelines. Lastly, I want to state that it was never my intention to misuse or abuse multiple accounts, disobey the regulations or to cause any confusion within the community. I created the seconnd due to an issue with my phone, and because of that I was unable to access my account and, in the moment, I used another account to continue contributing until I got my phone repaired. I realize now that this may have violated Wikipedia’s guidelines. I know I did wrong and deserve penalties. Please show leniency. [[User:Wallclockticking|Wallclockticking]] ([[User talk:Wallclockticking#top|talk]]) 01:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Wallclockticking (talk) 01:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jay Knox

edit
 

The article Jay Knox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jay Knox for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Knox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Knox (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply