| 4 | Normal | |
| 3.92 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 17:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC) | edit | |
Reports
edit- AdanHTT (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Level II. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2405:201:a403:4164:dcf9:1847:4ebe:93dd (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- 188.241.46.197 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 135 five times in the last 5 minutes (Repeating characters, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- 103.54.14.83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- 2804:14D:5A83:4F1A::/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block. Resumed on range. Last at User talk:2804:14D:5A83:4F1A:9D09:BF2F:6A0A:6EDE. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- 31.6.216.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Time Squad (diff): vandalism after recent release of block. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Zaniel Ivan Rodriguez (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – replacing Bryanboy content with self-promotion spam, and self-promotion spam on user page/talk. Cystathionine (talk) 06:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- 68.106.251.16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Richard Simmons (diff): vandalism after final warning. Mostly disruptive edits. See talk page and contribution history. Looks like a bot with massive number of edits close together. Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- also see filter log Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- also see filter log Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 4 |
| Empty articles | 3 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 6 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 6 |
| Possibly contested candidates | 9 |
| Other candidates | 27 |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 7 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 76 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 9 items
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
- September 08 (Sunday) (1 open / 51 closed / 52 total discussions; open: 1)
- September 07 (Saturday) (0 open / 66 closed / 66 total discussions)
- Ausernamea (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Gary4rfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- DreckSpar (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
edit- CatTits10 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Cat... Tits. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Soetermans This has been previously rejected at this noticeboard and the user now has nearly 3k edits. If you feel the username needs addressing and the user doesn't agree, you can start a discussion at WP:RFC/N. And as there was an AIV report about this user earlier today, if you feel their editing is disruptive, ANI is the most appropriate venue. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, who reported me before? CatTits10 (talk) 02:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- The previous report can be seen at Special:Permalink/1243957598. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, who reported me before? CatTits10 (talk) 02:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Soetermans This has been previously rejected at this noticeboard and the user now has nearly 3k edits. If you feel the username needs addressing and the user doesn't agree, you can start a discussion at WP:RFC/N. And as there was an AIV report about this user earlier today, if you feel their editing is disruptive, ANI is the most appropriate venue. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Linuxchuck (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- ReggieLondonLawyer (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 20:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I recuse myself from considering this as I've been involved in a discussion on the page. Not the one related to the request, but I think it would be ill-advised for me to be the protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: for the Greek language page - Persistent disruptive editing to relationship status by an erotomaniac woman who thinks she is in a relationship with Jason Momoa. 2605:59C8:5286:B500:E8F8:FF1:AF20:68A5 (talk) 21:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined We cannot help you with a protection request at elwiki since we do not have any authority there. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @2605:59C8:5286:B500:E8F8:FF1:AF20:68A5: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been plagued by persistent and blatant vandalism by IP editors, along with newly created accounts. Complaints about vandalism go back to at least 2015. Discussions on its talk page, along with limited duration page protections have totally failed to stop vandals repeatedly inserting identical uncited nonsense. As soon as any temporary protection expires, the vandal returns. Please apply indefinite page protection to retain the integrity of this article, for the relief of the genuine editors who constructively improve this. Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Militum professio scriniarii: If the vandalism is from
IP editors
andnewly created accounts
, wouldn't semi-protection be enough? jlwoodwa (talk) 02:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC) - Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I respectfully ask you to reconsider. This article has suffered from repeated and systematic vandalism by IP editors AND newly created accounts. To answer {Ping|Lectonar}} about "not enough recent disruptive activity" - that is simply because the previous protection only expired around the 4 September 2024 - a day later, an IP inserted the identical unsourced BS about China and North Korea being official suppliers. If you kindly look at its edit history from 2 September 2023 and older, there are approximately 56 IP edits (by various IPs) reverted for the same uncited inclusion of China and North Korea being suppliers going back to January 2021. The edit history during that period is just filled with various registered users reverting this persistent vandalism.
- To answer @Jlwoodwa: - yes, I agree that seems more appropriate to go for semi-protection. But being as this as suffered the same identical vandalism since 2015 - I honestly think indefinite protection is needed. Should any IP need to add genuine cited info, they can use the 'protected edit request' facility on its talk page. Kind regards. Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 08:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Recurrent unhelpful edits from logged-out users (eg changing to "German victory"). High notability topic so that's likely to continue (largest clash of tanks in armoured warfare history at the time
). Suggest PC for low impact. Slowking Man (talk) 00:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent low-level IP vandalism. About once a month someone changes his middle name to "Lamborghini". Neither the amount nor the recency matters, it should not be permitted to continue. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of new user / IP unsourced and unconstructive edits. Out of the past 50 edits, only a single one of them hasn't been reverted. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated addition of unsourced and/or incorrect content (last edit removed fradulent label claims). Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and now the article is being redirected to another page but cant be reverted back by the system , seems disabled by the system Bennysubawa (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandals. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 03:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. BlueboyLINY (talk) 06:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and slow edit-warring. Previously, it was fast edit-warring and COI editing, such as Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#Legal_threat. 174.89.12.36 (talk) 07:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: This redirect is fully protected because of an argument about whether it should be its own article. This dispute was settled over nine years ago, so this page's current level of protection is unnecessary. Cyrobyte (talk) 19:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Please I want to make a Wikimedia for an artist Mrrodney01234 (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mrrodney01234: That isn't the kind of edit request that this section is for. If you want help with creating a new article, I recommend asking at the Teahouse. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
editA historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 22 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFPERM (rollback)
Rollback
edit- TryAgainSooner (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I recently applied for rollback and withdrew my request after realizing that I was below the required 200 main space edit count. Now, I have 206 main space edits (mostly anti-vandalism work) as well as a month of experience. I would like access to rollback in order to use tools like Huggle and Anti-Vandal to revert vandalism more quickly. During my very first efforts to revert vandalism, I did fail to warn some users as I did not have access to RedWarn or Twinkle and had not yet read the related policies. Shortly after that, I read WP:VANDAL. Now, I believe I have since built a strong track record of warning the user every time I revert their edits and reverting only when appropriate. Thanks! TryAgainSooner (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 15:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Done -Fastily 22:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a strongly active and, I believe, positive contributor to Wikipedia for over 4 months now, and have throughly enjoyed my time editing and undoing vandalism/unconstructive edits whenever I see them. I have not reverted a *ton* of vandalism, but I do believe that I have at least demonstrated by ability to discern and do so, as well as doing my best as of recently to notify users when I revert their edits. Moreover, I commit to using this right fairly, constructively, and honestly if given it. Thanks Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 02:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Understood Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also I’m sure you noticed but I am also requesting the Pending Changes Reviewer permission, I think that would significantly help me in patrolling / doing anti vandalism as well. Since you are an admin, could you look into that request of mine? I would appreciate it Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- ClaudineChionh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been cleaning up vandalism mostly with the help of Twinkle. I was granted temporary rollback rights in 2021 but then life got busy and I didn't seek an extension. I now have more time to dedicate to counter-vandalism efforts again. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 13:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for account creator.