Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 278

Archive 275 Archive 276 Archive 277 Archive 278 Archive 279 Archive 280 Archive 285

Jack Appleby

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —ThatGuyIsAlwaysRight (talk) 11:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Deb (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hut 8.5 17:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Wild Life Festival

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) LukeOcana (talk) 16:41, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 17:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Please don't delete Mahendra Kumar (magistrate)

Mahendra Kumar born 05 May 1987), is an IAS Officer of 2011 batch borne to the Bihar cadre. He is 32th District Magistrate of Siwan Bihar (India). Please don't delete this page if you verify see this document >> http://www.siwan.bih.nic.in/GAD.asp— Preceding unsigned comment added by Giteshs78 (talkcontribs) date (UTC) 17:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Current article (as of this writing) is the third creation under this title of an article previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DM Mahendra Kumar. --Finngall talk 18:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Kashan Khan Sherazi (talk) 20:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

This page has not been deleted (yet). You can prevent it from being deleted by adding a reliable source to the article to confirm some of the content. Hut 8.5 20:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

User talk:FlightTime/Alternate talk page

The direction I was going to go, isn't going to work, so I'll need that page back. Thank you very much —- FlightTime (open channel) 20:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

I moved the page back. I don't know if there is any useful history that remains deleted. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
There is nothing to restore, there is only a redirect and speedy delete nomination. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Mahaguru

To match the recent draftification of Mahaguru, the talk page should be undeleted and moved to Draft talk:Mahaguru. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 22:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Vusamazulu Credo Mutwa

Page vandalised by user:Thomas.W —Oficinalis (talk) 22:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Christopher Freeze

Could you please undelete, or move my draft space, the just-deleted Christopher Freeze article. I put a lot of work into improving the content and referencing of the original deleted version I found, and would like to continue developing it some more, as it was my first article and the guy seems to be notable. Thank you for your time and consideration. Mrg00dbar (talk) 16:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

@Mrg00dbar: because the most recent deletion constituted an agreement by an administrator that your version probably wasn't different enough from the previously deleted version, I'm reluctant to override the deletion decision without a response from the deleting administrator. Please contact the deleting admin Spinningspark (talk · contribs) and ask if he's OK with restoring the article to draft space for further improvement. I can see that you did a good amount of work on it, so I think you have a good case. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
I already have reached out with no response. I would be content with restoration to a draft space, and am glad you recognize the improvements. Mrg00dbar (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
That was only an hour before the response above. So please give them a chance! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
48 hours, and no response for the original admin. Mrg00dbar (talk) 15:52, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
I've put it into draft space, but this probably should go back to AFD for reconsideration if it comes back to mainspace more or less as it is. SpinningSpark 22:54, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

International Overdose Awareness Day

I, 103.253.92.96, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 103.253.92.96 (talk) 02:51, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

  Not done This article was not deleted under G13. It was deleted as an advertisement and copyvio. It will not be restored because of this. I suggest starting from scratch. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Trm5y (talk) 08:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

@Trm5y:   Not done for now. You are an employee of Lightbox. You agreed to comply with Wikimedia Terms of Use when you created your account here. You must disclose your paid editing status. Please see WP:PAID for details. Please get into compliance, then contact me or re-request here, and we can restore the article to draft space, not main space. Editors with a conflict of interest, like you have, should be using Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit draft articles for review, not creating them directly in main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

I am happy to use Wikipedia:Articles for creation

Thanks

Tina Trm5y (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Liquid phase electron microscopy

I did not find time previoulsy to finish my text but would like to finish it now and then post the entry —Nielsdejonge1 (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

@Nielsdejonge1:   Declined. That wasn't a draft article, that was just a collection of test edits more suitable for your sandbox. You are welcome to start over. Or I could restore it to your sandbox. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Gurpreet garry walia

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —42.111.52.102 (talk) 16:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC) I wish to work on the article and will surely improve it. The article has many references .

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garry Walia, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Prakash Neupane

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Hermanonline (talk) 19:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Neupane (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

rich riley

He is CEO of a popular app (Shazam) used by hundreds of millions of people around the world, and executive producer of a popular TV show (Beat Shazam), among many other credits; he also had a Wiki page for many years without incident —Nikolaievans (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to undelete. Rich Riley is currently a redirect, and if you go to that redirect, all the history is there. It was converted to a redirect due to WP:BLP1E, and a subsequent request by an editor with a conflict of interest, archived at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016_December 5, was also denied. You also seem to be a single purpose account; what is your association with Mr. Riley? ~Anachronist (talk) 17:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I'm actually not at all associated with him, but I am a reporter who was doing some research on him and was shocked to see that he didn't have a Wiki page when I checked here for the basics. I've seen it and referred to it several times in the past so I was surprised to not see it here and hoping to use it as a baseline for info on him. I also actually think he is not just notable for a single event, especially with the Beat Shazam show and other things in the past. To be honest, I signed up just to request undeletion and got through the process, as I thought it had been deleted. It would be a very helpful page for me and other reporters or...really any tech industry people. Is there any way to simply restore it?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikolaievans (talkcontribs) 17:51, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Every edit ever made to that article is available in the history of the redirect page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rich_Riley&action=history
Keeping in mind that notability is not inherited (that is, just because he produced a notable TV show doesn't mean he is notable too), feel free to pick one of those versions and expand on it if you feel that he's notable for more than just one thing. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Jordan Smith (outfielder)

Closing admin, @SoWhy: stated that WP:REFUND applies. I think that this subject passes GNG. I don't think these sources were present in the article at the time it was deleted. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:57, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

  Done, article restored, along with its talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Edits were made in response to the reasons cited for deletion. —Mboxcar (talk) 22:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAVEX Global, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sarahj2107 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Rentalcars.com

I would like to edit this page and submit it for publication into wikipedia please —KatFishy (talk) 11:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

  Not done @KatFishy: Article has never been deleted. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:BPC-157

I, Erik.Bjareholt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Erik.Bjareholt (talk) 14:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexicable

I am requesting the restoration of this article since it discussed a public transport system in Mexico City´s metropolitan area. This was a page I was working on, and it is important that Wikipedia displays the information about this system, because people might be interested in its history, characteristics and other information in order to use this transport, specially because it was in spanish, which is the language of people that most likely would be interested in this page. According to user "Alelapenya" it was a "vanity page", which I must disagree (this user's profile seems to have a history of previous disputes regarding the elimination of other pages). I don't know the user reasons to consider it under this category, perhaps it was because it metioned the politicians that attended the inaugural event of the "Mexicable" (something I did not add). If this was the case, I think deleting the whole article was an exaggeration, since this user could have deleted just the sentence referring to the politicians (something I would be fine with).The dismissal of other valuable contributions in that page because of a small mistake seems outrageous to me. If the "vanity page" accusation was not because of the politicians, then its removal is even more absurd. I hope this is resolved soon and that, whatever the answer is, it turns out to be the best for the Wikipedia community. —Aninonimo (talk) 16:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Please note that 1) Mexicable is not deleted on English Wikipedia, 2) Spanish Wikipedia's standards for articles may be different from those on English Wikipedia, and 3) English Wikipedia administrators have no power over what happens on other wikis. --Finngall talk 17:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  Not done. This is the English Wikipedia, completely independent of the Spanish Wikipedia. You'd have to go there and find a similar place to make this request. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Said "similar place" is linked to in the languages sidebar near the top of the page: [8]. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

BENLAV Flight Systems

This is a new and fast growing startup among Iranian aviation and engineering students, knowledge based, educational, eLearning, avionics workshop and this article is an info, so please do NOT delete and help for improvement and say reasons. thanks —Amir daryaei (talk) 04:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Unfortunately that's not what we consider as Significance here since it's actually a matter of whether there's actual major independent news and whether it's uninvolved to the company's own attention motivates, because if it is, then it cannot be accepted as significance here. Wikipedia is not business webhost. SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lenny_Simpson

I believe this was deleted because I did not edit it for 6 months. I had to put this on a back burner due to health and pressing matters but am committed to finishing it. Please restore. —Janetgaino (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Suman Kumar Kasturi

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —117.195.207.151 (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suman Kumar Kasturi, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Balboa Scale

I, Bearyake, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bearyake (talk) 11:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ghani Jafar Malik

I, Masrorhausen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MasrorHausen 07:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. the page is now called Draft:Ghani Jafar Malik. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:International Documentary Film Festival CRONOGRAF

I, Nerd1a4i, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nerd1a4i (talk) 15:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" It's going to need some references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

The Lexicon

There was no advertising material present on the page at all. The page was based on a shopping centre. I didn't include any advertising at all. This is the first Wikipedia page I have made, and so would appreciate any advise on how to ensure this no longer happens. —BracknellSince85 (talk) 08:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

@BracknellSince85:   Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.
More specifically, your use of unsubstantiated puffery words like "excellent" and "state of the art", and the overall presentation that reads like a company brochure, clearly indicates that the article was created for the purpose of publicity or promotion. Also, please see WP:PAID and comply with it, if you are associated with The Lexicon, you must disclose it.
Furthermore, if you have an association with The Lexicon, you have a conflict of interest. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for more guidance. As an editor with a conflict of interest, you shouldn't create and edit articles in the main article space directly. It is preferable for you to create the article in your sandbox or in draft space, and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation before it can be published in main space.
Once you publicly disclose your association per WP:PAID (or if you are not receiving compensation, disclose your conflict of interest), we can restore the article to draft space for you to work on. You may contact me once you've made that disclosure. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)


Hi. Would you be able to undelete it, and I will remove words such as "excellent" and "state of the art" please?

I also have no association with The Lexicon. I am just a local resident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BracknellSince85 (talkcontribs) 16:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@BracknellSince85: I have restored the article to draft space. Please work on improving Draft:The Lexicon and submit it for review using the button in the gray box at the top. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Katharine Gorka

insufficient review by editors that were not previously involved with prior deletion and articles created by creator. New news worthy events have occurred since deletion of previous —Wikipietime (talk) 12:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@Wikipietime: It looks like Metropolitan90 (talk · contribs) has already userfied the article to User:Argento Surfer/Katharine Gorka. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Houndstooth (record label)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Butterworthrj (talk) 14:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

One of the reasons cited for deletion of the page was that the label was using the page as a promotional vehicle, it merely listed it's back catalogue as many record label pages do. If this is an unacceptable format it should have been requested that it was changed.

Houndstooth is a record label from fabric Records, the label has a Wikipedia discography page and the club has also has it's own Wikipedia page. A number of the artists on the label have their own Wikipedia pages.

Houndstooth has been in existence for 4 1/2 years, releasing some notable albums in the electronic music world. The sites discussed that it had been given credit by include Resident Advisor the worlds's leading electronic music site. Being voted label of the month is a very high honour, that only 12 labels a year receive, given the hundreds of labels in existence this should be given far more credit than was disputed. Other sites including Tiny Mix Tapes, Dazed, Dummy and XLR8R are all significant sites in the music industry.

Discogs page https://www.discogs.com/label/509824-Houndstooth

Please reinstate this page.

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houndstooth (record label), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

File:GS-TLA Cast.jpg

Please restore this file as I have restored the page which it was formerly. (It is a non-free file.) —Steel1943 (talk) 03:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Done, but are you sure it is appropriate? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Golden sun cast.png

Please restore this file as I have restored the page which it was formerly. (It is a non-free file.) —Steel1943 (talk) 03:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Done, but are you sure it's appropriate? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Elíz Camacho

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) R3adyWrit3s (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

The draft isn't deleted... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jonno Davies

(no text provided) Rob Bolton (talk) 16:27, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

City National Arena

City National Arena is the headquarters of the Vegas Holden Knights NHL team, their practice facility, and will feature their official restaurant —NetWitz830 (talk) 05:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NetWitz. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
    •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City National Arena, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 06:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

National Diversity Coalition for Trump

article was well sourced and very noteworthy —Wikipietime (talk) 12:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

It was deleted as being an advertisement. You can contact the deleting admin user talk:Alex Shih if you disagree with this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Denis Periša

Denis Perisa plays major role in Croatian cyber culture back from 90's . Its really a shame to delete his page. Maybe it had lot of intern links related to his country but still, he made impact on most Slavic countries and it's not right to delete his page -ivan —193.198.44.68 (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mónica García

I, Jefferson.crain, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jefferson.crain (talk) 18:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Liu Xiaoyu (basketball)

The article was created on 08/08/2017 by a user, another user immediately placed a proposal for it to be deleted due to having no reference. I saw this article on that day, but was too busy (lazy) to edit it. Then the article was deleted 7 days after its creation. However, this guy definitely does exist, I can provide several references from the web:

http://www.nbadraft.net/players/liu-xiaoyu

http://basketball.asia-basket.com/player/XiaoYu_Liu/China/Shanghai-Sharks/94360

https://basketball.realgm.com/player/XiaoYu-Liu/Summary/32325

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1059152.shtml

Therefore, I would like to request this article to be restored. Thanks. 120.16.35.33 (talk) 15:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please move the references to suitable places on the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ahmed White

Professor White now has a named Chair and I believe this addresses the deficiencies in his notoriety that were preventing the page from going live before, thank you —Kouklatess (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:John D. G. Rather

I edited the draft two weeks ago, making changes based on a review that came back asking for better source citation. I submitted the revision for revision in the hopes that the page would be accepted and published. I still haven't heard back about the review. I'm not sure why this page is nominated for deletion, but I'm still waiting for the review to see whether my changes are acceptable in order for the page to be published. —2602:30A:C064:23F0:C0EE:6179:2017:FF98 (talk) 17:22, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Nothing happened to this two weeks ago. Did you edit a different page? Any way you can continue work on this one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Sarah.t.life's About Page

I request that you should not have my Category/Page, "Sarah.t.life's About Page" for speedy deletion because, this would give/let Users/my Friends to have the option to easily look for my About Page. —Sarah.t.life 14:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC) Sarah.t.life 14:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

@Sarah.t.life: Wikipedia is not social media, and editors do not get "about pages" that are tangential to the actual goal of writing an encyclopædia. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bhaga Mining

I, 72.95.104.248, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 72.95.104.248 (talk) 11:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Zerai Deres

Now meets the expansion criterion for DYK — —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 17:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

  Already done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jonno Davies

I, Rob Bolton, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rob Bolton (talk) 21:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

  Already done by Hut 8.5. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Holly Hogrobrooks (request restore (un-deletion) of this page

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) SSWalker (talk) 09:19, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done due to it being a copyright infringement. Please start again from scratch, and do not copy other people's writings. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Art Of Illusion (software)

I, Peteihis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peteihis (talk) 22:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:David Coventry

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Lyttle ones (talk) 20:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Peter Frishauf (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done Due to the closure of the AFD being softdelete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Brooks Law Group, PA Building

I, Jenna at AYELawCo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jenna at AYELawCo (talk) 16:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:03, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Polyák Péter

I, Polygo13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Polygo13 (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:52, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:IASAGlobal

I, Davidlsight, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. David Slight (talk) 19:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Hollywood Beauty Awards Logo.jpg

Permission received for File:Hollywood Beauty Awards Logo.jpg Ticket:2017041210000018 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:43, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

@4nn1l2:   Done can you tag as having appropriate permission. Hut 8.5 06:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

BetBright

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Cnrwhite1990 (talk) 09:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Catharyne (Cathy) Ward,

I, 84.9.67.170, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 84.9.67.170 (talk) 08:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

not abandoned, wish to complete —84.9.67.170 (talk) 08:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:KioWare

While the initial article was not newsworthy (as deemed by Wiki editors), events have occurred in recent months, and we have been mentioned elsewhere on Wikipedia, requiring us to make some additions and changes to the initial page with a (hopefully) different outcome. —Lboniello (talk) 19:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC) Laura Boniello

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Medice

I, Richard Ammer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Richard Ammer (talk) 08:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

More information could be gathered to show the relevance of the topic —Richard Ammer (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

CRMNEXT

Request the undeletion of the Articles CRMNEXT required editing will be done to meet policy or guideline, Request to restored page back —Shuklamayank330 (talk) 07:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

BiggerPockets

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Lindaweygant (talk) 23:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

I would like to retrieve my page in order to try to improve it.

Thank you

  • You don't appear to have edited this before. Could you have edited with another logon before? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Flowmon Networks

I, ApemZawri, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ApemZawri (talk) 10:34, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Magic Kingdom - Walt Disney World Railroad poster.jpg

This file is non free, but it represents the attraction poster for the Walt Disney World Railroad. This was previously deleted because it was unused, but I am willing to make use of it and place it in the Walt Disney World Railroad article. —Davidng913 (talk) 01:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

  • It is now in use. But apparently it will be deleted after 9/2/17.--Davidng913 (talk) 14:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Arman Vino

all objects are true and then click the "Save page" button below —109.42.2.20 (talk) 07:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Join (algebraic geometry)

Not abandoned (only old). —Taku (talk) 09:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:37, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tropical compactification

Not abandoned (merely old). —Taku (talk) 09:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:37, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Obstruction cycle

ditto —Taku (talk) 09:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sheaf of spectra

ditto —Taku (talk) 09:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Specialization (algebraic geometry)

Not abandoned (also not AfC submission). —Taku (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tony Gonzalez

I, DaniFernn, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DaniFernn (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:AHI (musician)

I, CassandraPadmore, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CassandraPadmore (talk) 14:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Quay Sailing Club

I, Aguyintobooks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. A Guy into Books (talk) 20:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Eugene Asti

The stub was tagged for speedy deletion under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. I followed a red link from another article and came to a message suggesting that I create a stub on the subject. I googled how to make a stub on wikipedia and arrived at Wikipedia:Make_stubs which looks exactly like guidelines for making stubs. I followed the guidelines scrupulously. The guidelines did not say that a stub needed to make apparent the subject's notability. The stub I created was tagged for deletion and then deleted because it did not indicate the subject's notability. On closer inspection I see that Wikipedia:Make_stubs includes a link to Wikipedia:Stub which says that even a stub must indicate the subject's notability. The link to Wikipedia:Stub was not at all obvious in Wikipedia:Make_stubs because it was camouflaged by boldface type and Wikipedia:Make_stubs did not make clear that there existed other guidelines which must be followed. The subject of the stub I created, Eugene Asti, is indeed notable (he is a prominent classical musician with at least 16 commercial recordings to his name and he regularly performs as a recital partner with other musicians who are notable enough to have Wikipedia articles already). I spent about two hours creating the stub and I would like to be able to edit it to add an indication of the subject's notability instead of having to start over from scratch. I did not anticipate that the stub I created would be deleted because I thought I was following the guidelines scrupulously so I did not keep a copy of the text and references. Please userfy the stub. —Dixhuitiemiste (talk) 03:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Coherency (homotopy theory)

I, TakuyaMurata, request the undeletion of this non-AfC draft page deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Taku (talk) 09:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Ignore the bits about AFC for all these restores. I should find a better response template. You can either move the page to your usespace if you want to take a long time, or move it to article space when it is ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:09, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Ginger House - birthplace of Ginger Rogers

I, Mpadgitt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mpadgitt (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

This page was not edited because the museum is not open yet. We are planning to open in November and would like to have the page published —Mpadgitt (talk) 16:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:17, 26 August 2017 (UTC)