Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2015/3

< Wikipedia:Articles for improvement‎ | Nominations‎ | Archives

Stationery edit

  Stationery – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 43 daily daily hits

  1. Support. NorthAmerica1000 14:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. Bananasoldier (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}} - Evad37 [talk] 01:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elmo edit

  Elmo – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - From 300 to 900 daily hits

  • I searched for Elmo and expected a well-developed article but there is just not good development there. There is not even a picture of Elmo himself. Poor guy, like all other characters in Sesame Street have a picture. That sucks for him. Help the article? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - very bad development. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 00:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Badminton edit

  Badminton – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2742 daily hits

  • Needs improvement. For example, several sections are entirely unsourced. NORTH AMERICA1000 03:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I tend to enjoy the look of improved articles as majorly expanded articles. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 21:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Island edit

  Island – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1027 daily hits

  • Has significant potential for improvement and expansion. NORTH AMERICA1000 02:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - Sure. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{approved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 23:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Technobabble edit

  Technobabble – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 63 daily hits

  1. Oppose - it seems not well known and I never heard such weird stuff. I tend to enjoy seeing popular articles get expanded. Popular article and well-known subject expansion is what I like best. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - if you don't understand my oppose comment, then ask me. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not meaning to suggest anything but curiosity here, but I'm fairly surprised that you've never heard of this term or subject before. I've heard it referenced (at the least) many hundreds if not thousands of times over the last few decades -- usually with regard to sloppily-written fiction, but also in the vein of fringe science or academia and increasingly in more mundane/day-to-day technical circumstances. My concern is whether or not we can really expand the topic substantially. The articles seems to presently capture the meaning of the concept pretty well (and is decently written, in my opinion). Further, expanding it too far with specifics will, I fear, invite fans of particular sci-fi franchises to start loading it with all manner of fan cruft. Snow talk 05:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Which audiences would know such stuff? General audiences? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • Yes, I'd say general audiences are familiar with the phenomena to varying extents, though certainly it is a more pronounced phenomena in areas of speculative fiction (and science fiction in particular).
But with regard to sourcing, we might actually find more coverage of the topic in sources regarding psuedo-science and fringe (or just poorly approached) academia, where it has increasingly become a concern, and not just in highly technical fields -- in the last couple of decades some areas the social sciences have been noted for having become increasingly inundated with work that relies on highly insular and often borderline-indecipherable idiolects that attempt to up-jump pet theories (or the impression of empirical rigor) via the application of needlessly complex jargon. The cognitive scientist/popular science writer Steven Pinker has spoken on this topic at length (most notably in The Blank Slate and more recently in The Sense of Style), as have other academics. Mind you, this is a somewhat different animal from either a fiction writer using convenient language without having much understanding of the science upon which it refers, or a dubious application of scientific language that garners support amongst non-expert enthusiasts of some fringe theory, but the contexts are related and the term "technobabble" itself can be (and has been) applied to all three varieties of scenario.
Again, I don't know that I think the article requires a great deal of attention just now -- arguably the academic context could be explored in more detail, but that's going to require careful sourcing and wording to avoid WP:OR concerns. But just by way of answering your question, I think the term has a fair degree of recognition. Snow talk 08:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - you may support this article if you wanted to. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 00:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Audio editing software edit

  Audio editing software – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support – plenty of opportunities for expansion here. NORTH AMERICA1000 07:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:27, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support ; CSJJ104 (talk) 22:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{approved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 23:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vending machine edit

  Vending machine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Needs a lot more improvement. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 02:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support --AmaryllisGardener talk 13:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{approved}} Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lunch edit

  Lunch – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 400 to 500 daily hits

  • Needs more refs and has OR problems. very important subject with potential. --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, although I am not sure if this nomination is already on the Holding Area. I hope it is not already in the holding area. Good luck! Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support NORTH AMERICA1000 01:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support --CSJJ104 (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}} Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Religious philosophy edit

  Religious philosophy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - very true. Sounds important. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, quite strongly. It doesn't only sound important, it is important. --AmaryllisGardener talk 21:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}} Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chick-fil-A same-sex marriage controversy edit

  Chick-fil-A same-sex marriage controversy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Oppose, controversial subject, plus it looks well reffed and pretty informational to me. --AmaryllisGardener talk 19:44, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - I am not sure if this is suitable for me. And plus, this does not feel like something important. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{not approved}} 3 opposes equals no to this one. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Firewood edit

  Firewood – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 132 daily hits

  1. Support - of course, even though I have no knowledge of firewood. Yes, needs more citations too. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved. NORTH AMERICA1000 09:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hors d'oeuvre edit

  Hors d'oeuvre – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

 
An assortment of hors d'oeuvres

  Already done. There is already an article called Hors d'oeuvre in the Holding area right now! Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crème brûlée edit

  Crème brûlée – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 600 to 800 daily hits

  1. Support NORTH AMERICA1000 23:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support for the high page hits. --31.48.13.115 (talk) 20:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Approved. NORTH AMERICA1000 21:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christ the Redeemer selfie edit

  Christ the Redeemer selfie – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

#Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Oppose, I don't think this is important enough to be a TAFI. --AmaryllisGardener talk 22:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - however, we could do this outside of TAFI. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – Nomination withdrawn. NORTH AMERICA1000 01:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved. NORTH AMERICA1000 01:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coastal Corporation edit

  Coastal Corporation – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  Not approved, no comments in over 3 weeks - Evad37 [talk] 02:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Hunger Games edit

  The Hunger Games – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5000 to 35000 daily hits

  • That article is about the franchise. If you look inside, a lot of things are missing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - if you don't believe me, check here.
  1. Support. NORTH AMERICA1000 16:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose too large for TAFI. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - wait, this is already improved by the writers of this ariticle. I had told them to improve it. Before, it was a major issue with the size; now it has expanded by over 18,000 bytes within a week and so it is already improved majorly. Just more pictures is necessary. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Done. The article is improved enough to equal a TAFI. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved. This article's underdevelopment has now been solved. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish cuisine edit

  Turkish cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  Not approved, no comments in over 3 weeks - Evad37 [talk] 02:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of brand name snack foods edit

  List of brand name snack foods – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - better list and citations. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong oppose General oppose including lists on TAFI. Specific oppose on grounds it will never be complete, and will only serve to increase WP:SysBias -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - do you think a strong oppose would equal 2 opposes? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely not. One oppose is one oppose, regardless of adverb used. NORTH AMERICA1000 01:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved. I withdraw this nomination. NORTH AMERICA1000 04:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Watercolor painting edit

  Watercolor painting – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 511 daily hits

  1. Support - although the content is all right, the reference style needs total updating. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose – fixing reference styles is out of scope of this project -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment @CFCF: Fixing referencing styles is not out of scope. TAFI's scope is literally "improve articles to Good article, Featured article or Featured list quality" – all of which have standards for referencing - Evad37 [talk] 07:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Well to rephrase it, I think we're going to get fewer volunteers when the work largely consists of checking old content instead of writing new content. I'm willing to support the entry if it can be shown or even suggested that the article can be improved in other ways. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 08:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Not approved. Not much support here, so I withdraw the nomination. NORTH AMERICA1000 04:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Brazilian drinks edit

  List of Brazilian drinks – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Oppose General oppose including lists on TAFI. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved. No support, withdraw nom. NORTH AMERICA1000 04:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Huntington Park, California edit

  Huntington Park, California – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Oppose Too specific for TAFI. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Not approved. I withdraw the nomination. NORTH AMERICA1000 04:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Report edit

  Report – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • Poorly written, and needing a huge amount and variety of different improvements. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support per nom. --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support --CSJJ104 (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{approved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 13:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peptide T edit

  Peptide T – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Single-origin coffee edit

  Single-origin coffee – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gourmand edit

  Gourmand – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish bread edit

 
Five types of Finnish bread

  Finnish bread – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Garlic soup edit

  Garlic soup – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - too small for satisfaction. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unapproved}} - been too long since last mention. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bread soup edit

  Bread soup – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - too small for satisfaction. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Petit-Beurre edit

  Petit-Beurre – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glycerin soap edit

  Glycerin soap – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 64 daily hits

  1. Support. Bananasoldier (talk) 02:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caribbean region of Colombia edit

  Caribbean region of Colombia – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Konstantin Bogaevsky edit

  Konstantin Bogaevsky – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Television in Russia edit

  Television in Russia – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:28, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chandelier edit

  Chandelier – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 400 to 600 daily hits

  1. Support NORTH AMERICA1000 00:17, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - I would say the definitions one is not looking as pretty as I expected. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Artisan cheese edit

 
France is famous for its artisanal cheeses, such as this cow's milk cheese from Le Puy-en-Velay.

  Artisan cheese – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Morzin Palace edit

  Morzin Palace – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union edit

  Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ornamental plant edit

  Ornamental plant – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Floriculture edit

 
Floriculture is a discipline of horticulture concerned with the cultivation of flowering and ornamental plants for gardens and for floristry, comprising the floral industry

  Floriculture – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - yes, and French Wikipedia has some useful information. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bioenergy edit

  Bioenergy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - it does need development. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, in need of improvement. --AmaryllisGardener talk 02:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fan (person) edit

  Fan (person) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 448 daily hits

  1. Support - Big potential. More interest, more citations, more expansion. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, big problems, big potential. --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Caramel edit

  Caramel – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 300 to 600 daily hits

  1. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. NORTH AMERICA1000 09:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - needs further work - 115.188.176.132 (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 12:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheeseburger edit

  Cheeseburger – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 200 to 400 daily hits

  1. Support NORTH AMERICA1000 23:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - very well-known. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - I would agree. 115.188.176.132 (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 12:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salzburger Nockerl edit

 
Salzburger Nockerl

  Salzburger Nockerl – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support, needs work. --AmaryllisGardener talk 22:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okra soup edit

  Okra soup – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Central European cuisine edit

  Central European cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Artisan edit

  Artisan – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 689 daily hits

  • A comprehensive topic that does not presently have comprehensive coverage in the article. NORTH AMERICA1000 08:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Types of chocolate edit

  Types of chocolate – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • This article has inadequate information about baking chocolate even though "baking chocolate" redirects there. Also, there needs more improvements. Comments if you can think of more improvements. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support. NORTH AMERICA1000 09:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - there is just no information about baking chocolate and its uses. 115.188.176.132 (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America1000 12:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caribbean natural region edit

  Caribbean natural region – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis the Wild Bull edit

  Dennis the Wild Bull – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Specialty foods edit

  Specialty foods – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - special article needed Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Astroland edit

  Astroland – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Employment edit

  Employment – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25000 daily hits

  • There is only a sentence or two for each section, and a one-line lead. Given the prevalence of the topic in the real world, there really ought to be a decent article about it. Rcsprinter123 (chew) @ 21:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support NORTH AMERICA1000 21:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Health food store edit

  Health food store – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • C-class article (on the weak side of C-class) that presently has only one source. NORTH AMERICA1000 00:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adventure travel edit

 
Trekking in Quebrada de las Conchas, Cafayate (Salta Province)

  Adventure travel – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prison cemetery edit

  Prison cemetery – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emergency management edit

  Emergency management – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bo-taoshi edit

 
Bo-taoshi is a capture-the-flag-like game, played on sports days at schools in Japan

  Bo-taoshi – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A-list edit

  A-list – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cue sports edit

 
Cue sports – an illustration of a three-ball pocket billiards game in early 19th century Tübingen, Germany, using a table much longer than the modern type

  Cue sports – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Horse racing edit

  Horse racing – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

 
Steeplechase racing at Deauville
  1. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dodgeball edit

  Dodgeball – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

 
A Dodgeball being thrown
  1. Support --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 12:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/2015/3&oldid=1136106744"