Talk:Technobabble
Latest comment: 2 years ago by ScottDavis in topic Merge from Turbo encabulator
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Merge from Turbo encabulator
editTurbo encabulator seems like a classic example of technobabble (described as such in at least one source), of borderline notability for a stand-alone article. Mergign this here might be a good idea, this is a substub that should probably discuss some prime examples of technobabble. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:52, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- As per my reply in Talk:Turbo_encabulator#Notability, I would not merge as I believe the other article to be notable in itself. The Turbo Encabulator could be mentioned here though, as an example. --LordPeterII (talk) 10:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per LordPeterII. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 01:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- The other end of the merge proposal has been removed as that article should stand alone. This article needs expanding in its own right. --Scott Davis Talk 12:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
"Big words" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Big words and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#Big words until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)