Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of sister cities in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fengcheng (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hey Z, I wanted to let you know that I finally got around to responding to your feedback of your Joan Ganz Cooney review. Thanks for doing it, and my apologies for it taking so bloody long. BTW, I don't think it was a COI at all; the article as it currently stands is substantially different than before I got my hands on it. Thanks for the feedback, and let me know how I assist moving forward. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 00:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! Just letting you know that I've reviewed your GA nomination for 2011 royal tour of Canada. At this time, I don't think it's ready, since there are still a lot of issues identified during the peer review that need to be resolved. I encourage you to resolve those first, then renominate it for GA status. Edge3 (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey Zan, I was puttering about GAC and saw that your nominated Snuffy's Parents Get a Divorce. I was tempted to review it, but I suspect that even though you've taken it over, I wouldn't be objective. After it passes, I'll take a look at it and do an informal review if you like. There are two issues I think I can address now, though. You have a note at the bottom of the article that states that it was based upon the article at Muppet Wiki. I haven't compared the Wiki article with the one here at WP, but I would strongly advise against doing that. I mean, you can start at the Wiki, but the article here should be substantially different, so that you're not accused of plagiarism. I've only done a cursory review of the sources, but they look good, so it may not be a huge issue. I also think that to be comprehensive, you should expand the info about the recent divorce episode with Abby Cadabby. (Hmm, come to think of it, there should be an article about that episode, too, even if it's a stub.) Hope this helps.
Hi Christine... thanks for the comments on the episode description, I'll try and go through that sometime this week. I'll try and get to Sesame Street media soon, it seems relatively straight forward. I've finally deleted my review page for Influence, so the GAN will reset to unclaimed. There were a few things here and there that could be changed, but the prose and referencing was strong overall. That said, I found lots of things that the show has been influential with, and you talk about (multiculturalism, research based programming), you don't necessarily link back to how it influenced children's media. The critical reception section would make a strong Critical reception of Sesame Street article, but without linking things back to the title/topic, I couldn't pass it. Better off to try and see if someone else would. But anyway, I'll get around to "media" in a bit. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ack, sorry, you pinned the nail on the head, I did forget. Some of the other reviews have been taking longer than I thought to resolve, and that mixed with work, I bit off more than I could chew. I'm starting now. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello and thanks for creating this article. It's been tagged as needing more reliable references and of doubtful notability for 5 years now. Would you be able to look it over and see if you can improve it? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Zan, would you do a big huge favor for me? One of my projects, other than Sesame Street articles, is working on articles about Maya Angelou. As a matter of fact, the creation of a FT for her and her works is a long-standing, many-years-long WP goal for me. So you mind going here [1] and taking a look? This FLC, for List of honors received by Maya Angelou, is one of the last steps in that long process. I'd greatly appreciate it.
Also, the Sesame Street media article is still in need of your attention. Hey, if you're not gonna get to it anytime soon, could you withdraw your review offer, so that someone else can review it? Again, thanks so much. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:29, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Good day Zanimum,
During the month of April, Wikimedia Canada is preparing the National Contribution Month, and we are looking for experienced contributors to organize a contribution day (or half-day) in their region.
Contribution days are activities where Wikipedia's contributors, students, or anybody interested in contributing to Wikipedia meets together to collectively improve a predetermined theme. This meetings generally take place in library where references are easy of access, but can be organized in any communal room. Beside improving articles, a goal of this participatory workshops is to initiate neophyte in the cooperative contribution of Wikipedia.
If you are interested in organizing or participating in a contribution day in your region, communicate witht he national team on the project's talk page. The exact agenda of each local event is left to the discretion of the organizer. Help is available for the organization from contributors who already organized these type of days, so don't be worried. If you have any questions or want more information, don't hesitate to contact us.
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fátima Ptacek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Hudson's Bay store logo 2013.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Hudson's Bay 2013 retailer logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Hudson's Bay store logo 2013.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:48, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Ah, I live to make obscure references to children's TV and music. When I respond to fellow editors to refer them to my talk page, I use "Here's the mail!" which is, of course, a reference to Blue's Clues. Just now, as I was writing this, a knock came at the door and it was a saleswoman. I swear, every time that happens, I want to run around the room yelling, "Salesman! Salesman!" like in Pee-wee's Playhouse. The title of this section is, of course, a reference to The Wiggles, as a reminder about your GA review of The Wiggles Pty Ltd. Have a nice day! ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
It's been over three weeks since you last posted to this GA review. Are you planning on returning to it soon, or should it go back into the GAN pool to find a new reviewer. Please let us know there. Many thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Zan, I really don't understand what's going on here. This article has been on hold for over a month now, and all it seems to need is your pass or not pass. I've addressed all your concerns, or at least I believe so. Could you please act on this, or at least communicate with me what I need to do? Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brampton Walk of Fame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhangra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello! I noticed that you created the review page for the Lauren Conrad GAN about a week ago, and haven't edited the page since. I was just wondering if you were still taking on the review. Regards, WikiRedactor (talk) 15:40, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sorry about that, I took the article home (where I don't have internet), reviewed it that day, then forgot to post it online... anyway, it's up now. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Thanks for reviewing the article, I've made the corrections you asked for. When you get the chance, let me know what you think of the revisions. Thanks! WikiRedactor (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
If there's any consequences to his putting magnets on cars, that would be encyclopedic. If anything, it could be a ticket. Maybe we can create a list of these things, but as text it doesn't add anything to the article about Ford. You'd hardly put this into an article about anybody, I think. Alaney2k (talk) 17:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hey Zanimum! I hope you're still taking the article's GA Review. It's been there for about more than a week since you last posted. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 14:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Barker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FallingGravity (talk) 20:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Under the circumstances, and given that a similar situation occurred with Talk:The Wiggles Pty Ltd/GA1 a couple of months ago (see entry earlier on this talk page), if nothing has been done on the review by the end of the weekend, it can be considered abandoned. It's a shame, but it's unfair to the nominator to start a review and never come back to it and fail to reply to queries as to whether the review will be resumed. (I'll be posting a similar note on the review page.) BlueMoonset (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Rafael Nelson M. Aboganda, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Comment: yeah, I know the above is boilerplate; pardon me for templating a regular, but I did want to give you the notification. TJRC (talk) 22:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey there, thanks for taking on my GAN for Heidi Montag! (Perhaps you've noticed that I'm a fan of The Hills!) Just letting you know that I've addressed the issues you noted in the review, however I couldn't replace one of the references you suggested with another source because it appears to be the only place with that quote. And if you ever need a favor, don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page! Regards, WikiRedactor (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Zan, I'm sure you're going to be unhappy with me, but I've reviewed this article for GA. To be honest, I'm kind of surprised; your work is usually much better. I recommend that you remove the nomination, work on the article more, and then resubmit it. Please let me know how I can assist. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian postage stamp of Acadian Deportation 1755–2005 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian postage stamp of Polio Vaccination 1955–2005 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I heard that on Muppet Wikia, there is an unusual name of the Sesame Street song broadcasted in early 1996. It's not "Happy and Proud", it's "Birthday Emotions". Check it on here.
One more thing, in "Birthday Emotions, someone is hugging a teddy bear, brown with a red bow. Dcelano 00:35, (UTC)
Hi Dcelano! I'm trying to figure out the context of this comment, and why it was made here, not Muppet Wiki. Does it relate to one of the articles we have on Wikipedia? -- Zanimum (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).
So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.
A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hello, Zanimum. You have new messages at Talk:The Clash of Triton/GA1. Message added 11:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Zanimum! Thank you for passing The Clash of Triton article a while ago. I'm so grateful that the article passed your and the GA standards. Also, thank you for your invaluable changes that you've made especially in the plot section. Thanks again and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 10:38, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Zanimum! Thank you once again for taking time to review an article I nominated. Anyway, I've already done what you've suggested. I hope you can pay it a visit because the review started almost two weeks ago. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 12:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Cheers Nicholas - the article is a spin off from Joburgpedia. I got interested in South Africa and there appears to be a lot of notable people without any article or just an unreferenced stub. Thanks Victuallers (talk) 15:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirby: Fright to the Finish!! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EDITOREat ma talk page up, scotty!02:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Zanimum/Archive 22. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added 00:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:The Monster at the End of This Book Starring Lovable, Furry Old Grover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:PAMA Peel logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Mirvish Gallery, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Smith, Bob Murray and Robert Fulford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
Thanks for starting a recategorization in the GA Film section--in retrospect, it's long overdue! I sorted A-B in support of your project this morning, and may try to do a few more letters later today. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Wow, thanks! I was worrying that people would revert, not that someone would like the concept enough to help with the sort, and give a barnstar. (By the way, that anonymous IP was me too. First time in a while that I've edited while accidentally logged out.) -- Zanimum (talk) 14:04, 19 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article David Bednar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edge3 -- Edge3(talk)21:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Zanimum. As part of the GA review, I looked at the sources that you used for this article, and I'm concerned that David Bednar might not meet our notability requirements. I'm going to file an AfD to see what the community consensus is. Unfortunately, this means that I will fail the GA nomination at this time. However, I recognize that you've waited so long for this review, and that you've made a significant contribution to the article, so I would be happy to review the second GA nomination if the AfD is closed as "keep". Regards, Edge3 (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bednar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edge3 (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi-I came across an article you first started Willows, Wisconsin about Barbie that was turned into a redirect. I turned it back to an article after I found an article from the Wisconsin Historical Society about the Barbie doll and being from fictional community of Willows, Wisconsin. Please feel free to look at it-thanks-RFD (talk) 12:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Dodd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 19:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Dodd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, Zanimum. As you may have noticed, there was no consensus on the AfD for David Bednar. I concede that the argument for deletion wasn't very strong, so if you renominate the article for GA status, I would be willing to complete the review. However, I won't be able to review it until early December, due to the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday in the US. Regards, Edge3 (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Zanimum ! I just wanted to thank you for taking up the review of "Can't Get You Out of My Head" (and passing it!). The nomination had been lying around for too long, but thankfully you took it up and what a clean and great review you had conducted seeing that the article is very large. It is Kylie's signature song and one of my personal favourites and I'm very happy and grateful that it is a GA now! Thank you so much! :) --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:52, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article David Mirvish Gallery you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammodramus -- Ammodramus(talk)19:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
The review's up; I apologize for the delay in getting it there. The article's definitely got GA potential, but there are some issues that need to be addressed. Look forward to working with you on this-- Ammodramus (talk) 15:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ford Nation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Taylor Trescott -- Taylor Trescott(talk)03:42, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Not to press you, but are you going to be able to resume work on the Mirvish Gallery article soon? Your contribution history doesn't show a lot of recent activity, which I hope means that you were having a busy and enjoyable holiday with little time to spare for matters Wikipedial. Now that we're slogging into 2014, though, I'd like to see some progress on this article: I'm reluctant to take on another GAR or embark on any other kind of major WP project while this is hanging fire. Ammodramus (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi Zanimum! The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Toronto! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join!
Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors.
Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Excuse me, but it's been a week. I just want to know if you're finishing it - if you don't have the time, ask another reviewer or something, I don't mind. Prism△11:18, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Mediran (t • c) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Zanimum, it's been a couple of weeks since the nominator responded to the issues raised in your review. Will you be able to get back to it soon to see whether it's ready for listing or needs more work? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Zanimum, it's been over a month since your last post to this review, and nearly that long since Mediran responded to your concerns. As soon as you return, please take a look at this one, and see whether it's ready to be listed or it needs more work. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Television for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 00:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Zanimum, it sounds like you're overwhelmed at the moment, since you've just said as much when you posted a 2ndopinion request for Dewey Decimal Classification in the hopes that someone would finish the review for you. Can you please do the same with Roar? Or, if you don't have time, I'm happy to post a request for you. Thanks, and I hope things get better for you soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There's been no progress on the David Mirvish Gallery GA nomination in something like a month and a half. Are you interested in continuing with it? If so, please let me know and let's get back to it; otherwise, I'll close it and let you renominate it when you're better situated to work on it. Ammodramus (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hi there - I'll start by saying, trout me if I got this wrong. It appeared to me that your GA1 review had ended. I was able to reserve the GAN as a GA2. After starting the review tonight, I re-read the entire talkpage, and now I'm not so sure that your GA1 actually ended. Please let me know, and let's figure out what should happen next. --Rosiestep (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, I see two earlier notes on this talkpage regarding this article's GA1 so I'm thinking you were ok with discontinuing it. But I'll leave the trouting option on the table for now. :) --Rosiestep (talk) 05:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gurn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
[Tinker Bell]] at Disneyland theme park inflates her cheeks and sticks her thumbs under her ears.]]]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I believe that I've addressed to your concerns. Are there any additional issues, or other suggestions or comments that I can take care of?--ColonelHenry (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you so much for the GA review for Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album). I very much appreciate you taking the time to review it and the kind words and friendly attitude really goes a long way. I hope to run into you on another GA down the line as you are one of the best reviewers I have had. STATicmessage me!21:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Thank you for taking interest in reviewing the article. However, I have also noticed that you are currently reviewing Anna (Disney). I just wanted to let you know that it is quite alright for you to complete your review on Anna before you begin mine. Please, do whatever is easiest for you :)--Changedforbetter (talk) 00:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks again for your input so far. I'm sure that being an admin often keeps you busy, though can you take a look now and see how it looks after the suggestions you gave? Look forward to your response and further input..... XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 03:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
File source problem with File:Shallowhalmovieposter.jpg
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for uploading File:Shallowhalmovieposter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm sorry if this message troubles you, but it's been nearly a month since I nominated Anna (Disney) for good article status. I know this is the first article that I did all the development by myself, so there must be a lot of issues scattering from beginning to end. And I'd love to hear from you and hope you continue to instruct me what else I need to revise. Thanks. Quenhitran (talk) 15:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, Zanimum. First, thank you again for the reviews and help! Second, yeah, it's very close, and I'll try to get other episodes to GA. Mr. Monk and the End is the most easy to do due to the extensive coverage it gained. However, I think I'll have to strive to get the other to GA status. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oh wow, that's quite unexpected! Thanks! I'm so glad that GAs are now eligible for DYKs, it's a great way of showcasing articles once they've flowered. -- Zanimum (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
My dad runs a non-profit art group, and as a result, a gallery space. Before the Vancouver Paralympics, I got in contact with the CPC, and they endorsed a display of Paralympic sport themed art our adult and youth members were planning. So then back before the London Games, I was searching the CPC website whether any of the Canadian athletes did art as a hobby. There was one man who drew cartoon art, and Summer, who collaborated with her sister on that kids' book. We never did contact her (incidentally, her drawing ability has grown leaps and bounds since the book, if her Twitter feed is any indication,) but I decided to create an article on her on Wikipedia. It was a fortunate random pick too, considering how well she did in London.
That's totally cool that you're such good friends, what are the odds? Very cool!
If she ever wants to have input into the article, let me know. I managed to connect with her parents around the time of the 2012 Paralympics, and they were able to point out a few errors in the article, things that articles claimed or implied that weren't actually the case. -- Zanimum (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thanks for your review of Martin Miller. Unfortunately I have been unable to find better sources for the article, so I imagine the best way to proceed is to close the review as a fail. Thank you for your time, C67914:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks, yeah, it's always interesting creating some wikidrama. I reverted my edit myself, I figured it was easier creating a firestorm (I mean, seriously, people have gone to ARBCOM over something as silly as this). With that being said, feel free to undo my undo or get someone else to do it. -- Tawker (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 11 April 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Flaherty, which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Thanks for picking this up. If you think the article should be nominated for A-class or even FA, please let me know. I don't want to settle for GA if I don't have to. If not, then any suggestions to bring it up? I've literally wrote everything I could find about this movie, without being too excessive. There's only one other bit of info I've been meaning to add and that is about the poster art. Thanks, again. JeremeK (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
Hi Zanimum and thanks for being willing to review Sip 'n Dip Lounge for GA. FWIW and FYI, I am in the wikicup and hoping to get all the current stuff I have in the queue done in time to claim points for this round (I'm not doing particularly well in point land...). So once you post your comments, I'll get on them just as fast as I can! Thanks! Montanabw(talk)21:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also, if you like to review articles about bars and such, another user pinged me that they had three GANs languishing for lack of reviewers, one which is Mary's Club. (I am reviewing a different GAN by this editor) - if you are interested, just an FYI. Montanabw(talk)06:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 19 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The 37's, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the episode "The 37's" was the first time in a Star Trek series that a Federation starship had landed on a planet's surface? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The 37's. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people from Brampton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Lynch and William Lawson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Went over your feedback and improved the article. I did have a comment and a question when you have a chance. Cheers, Mkdwtalk03:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for reviewing Pattycake and passing the article. I'll keep trying to improve it. FYI... User:Legobot does most of the GA tasks now, so you don't need to add the GA icon to future reviews. If you do, there's a possibility it could cancel out the nominator notification process. I'm going to raise this issue on the GA talk page right now as we have very poor documentation on the process (and it seems to change every week). Viriditas (talk) 02:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion
You mentioned a way to get rid of the ref group, but I couldn't figure out how. By subdivided to its own area you mean breaking the refs up and insert to different areas? P.S. I did not add this ref group, therefore I myself don't know their content. Forbidden User (talk) 18:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
It's about a week now. Please reply. Meanwhile, I've fixed the problems you mentioned in the GA review. Could you please check the article again? Opinions welcomed! Forbidden User (talk) 08:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
I think I've solved the problem above, as well as other problems you raised in the GA review. Do you mind spending some time to give further review on the page?Forbidden User (talk) 12:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
You seem to be working on some GA reviews these days. I hope you haven't forgotten this one. Sorry for spending a whole week on fixing stuff, but now I think I've completed it. Please, do check out the article and give comments on the review page. Any opinion is appreciated. Thanks!Forbidden User (talk) 14:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there, Bluemoonset left a note for you at the DYK nom for the article on May 18, but I see the article hasn't been edited since May 11. Were you thinking of doing anything further on the nom? Either way, if you leave a note at the DYK discussion, it could help editors monitor what's happening... Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Just to let you know that I'm closing the nomination as unsuccessful. It's been open for over three months, which is far too long. Furthermore, you've been active since I pinged you on May 18, yet there has been no response on the nomination template nor, as hamiltonstone notes, any edits on the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. NeilNtalk to me04:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
For putting up with me and Red in the Red Skelton GA review.:) I started working with the article some time ago and needed to stop because everywhere I was trying to add refs, it came up copyvio. :( The issue turned out to be foundational and went back some years. There wasn't much left to it after that had to go, so I started trying to get it back to B article status. Coming back to it recently, we found that both his official website and another online source had copied our content and labeled it with their own copyrights. :/
You mentioned that you'd like to see someone write an article about the bomber Skelton collected money to pay for via his radio show. I found some news stories about the meeting of Skelton and the pilot (this man was the third and last one) which go into a bit of history about the action the bomber saw. I'll post the news story links to the article's talk page in case it might get someone interested in making a start at an article about the plane. Thanks again for your help! We hope (talk) 13:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Zan, hope all is well with you. Would you mind helping me out? My most recent FAC [2] is languishing and in danger of failed due to lack of support. For some reason, many of my FACs seem to do that; I've found that soliciting assistance helps. Thanks, I appreciate it. Let me know how I can assist you. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
(basketball)|Andrew Nicholson]], currently a Power Forward for the [[Orlando Magic]] of the [[NBA]<ref>{{cite news|title=Hoops star gives back|url=http://www.mississauga.com/sports-story/
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Haye. Waxaan ahay steward. Xeerka cusub ee ku saaban in laga taqaluso "xuquuq hore" (Maamul, bureaucrat, IWM) kuna tiirsan kulanka bulshada ugu dambayn. Sida uu qabo xeerkaan, stewards waxay dabagal ku samaynayaan maamulka' firfircoon ee wikiga taa soo aan ku jirin xeerka firfircoonida.
Waana kuwa yeeshay sifooyinkaan (aan waxba bedelin iyo gudagalid la'aan dhaqdhaqaaq 2 sanoadod gudahood) ee wikiga, kuwaasoo kala ah Maamuleyaal. laga soo bilaabo sowiki aan lahayn masuuliyad gaara' howsha soo bandhigista xuquuqda, waana mid lagu dabaqayo hab caalami ah.
Haddii aad dooneeysid inaad sii haysato xuquuqdaada, waa inaad soo ogaysiisaa bulshada maamulaha ayaa ii soo diray macluumaadkaan taasoo ku cadeeyneeyso in aadan lahayn wax dhaqdhaqaaq ah si looga wadahadlo arrinkaas. Ka gadaal markii ay ka wada doodaan mujtamacaada, hadii ay bulshadaada ay doonayaan in aad sii haysato xilka, fadlan kala soo xiriir stewards m:Stewards' noticeboard, iyo linkiga dooda bogga gaarka ah ee aad doodu ka dhacday, kuwaasoo cadeeyey in ay doonayaan inaad sii wadato howshaada, iyagoo ku muujinaya in ay jirto baahi ah inaad sii joogto si aad usii haysato xuquuqdaan.
Haddii aan nahay stewards waxaan soo gudbin doonaan jawaabaha. Hadii aaneey dhicin wax jawaab ah bil gudaheed, waxaan guda gali doonaan in aan sii wadno in lagaa xayuubiyo xilka ama maamulka. Haddii laga shakiyo, waxaan guda gali doonna diyaarinta in laga dhiidhiyo waxaana ku celin doonaan mujtamacaada si ay uga faaloodaan. Haddii aad qabto wax su'aal ah, fadlan nagala soo xiriir m:Stewards' noticeboard.
No need to hurry, man. I've addressed anything he raised, and I will continue doing so. These days I'm rather concentrated on Walt Disney, and so the time isn't so tight. There is no time limit.Forbidden User (talk) 10:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
@Gabriel Yuji: Good to hear from you! I'm 99% sure that I got the information from Google Books' snippet view search. It's page 224, which seems to be showing up for me. (Until now, I totally didn't connect your Ganga Bruta article with the Monk articles.) -- Zanimum (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I was hoping you had the book but the page already helps me a lot. (Haha why not? Prepare to see even more unconnected articles written by me). Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 01:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I can see from your contributions log that you've been editing today. If you're too busy at the moment, please tell me. If you'd rather not finish the review, although I would be very glad if you did finish it, I'll renominate it for another reviewer.
@Ɱ: Hi... sorry for pausing mid-review, I will get back to it in the near future. Keep in mind that there are articles in the same GAN category waiting without a reviewer since January, so a paused review is mild in comparison. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I know, I just figured that a GAN without a reviewer is better than a GAN with a reviewer who abandoned it. Thanks for the reply, I'll look forward to working with you.--ɱ(talk)23:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hi Zan, hope all is well with you and that you're enjoying your summer. I appreciate your GA review of the Kuwaiti co-production; am working on it now. After it's done, would you mind looking at my recent FAC, which happens to yet another Sesame Street article? [3] I must say, it's a very cool article about an aspect of The Show not many people are aware of, so I'm sure you'll enjoy. Thanks as always. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for the feedback. She does seem to have been an interesting person. I had no plans to nominate for GA, but if it were nominated would try to respond to any queries. I think it is reasonably accurate as far as it goes but there are large gaps, e.g. nothing about her parents. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent software changes
Due to the Wikimania 2014 conference, there were no MediaWiki changes this week. The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf16) will be added to non-Wikipedia wikis on August 12, and to all Wikipedias on August 14 (calendar). [4]
Bureaucrats on all Wikivoyage wikis are no longer able to merge two accounts into one. [5]
VisualEditor news
Tablet users visiting the mobile version of non-Wikipedia wikis will be able to use VisualEditor starting on August 12. The feature will also be enabled on all Wikipedias on August 14. [6]
Future software changes
Internet Explorer 6 users will soon see a JavaScript-free version of Wikimedia wikis; JavaScript tools and scripts will no longer work on that browser. If you use Internet Explorer 6, make sure to update to a newer browser! [7][8][9]
If you visit a special page that requires you to be logged-in, you will soon be automatically redirected to the log-in page instead of seeing a warning. [10][11]
You will now always see recent changes to the source language text when editing a translation with the Translate extension. [12][13]
An IRC meeting to discuss VisualEditor will take place on August 14 at 09:00 UTC on the channel #wikimedia-office on freenode (time conversion). [14]
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Zanimum! Hope all is well. Late last month, you offered to review David Hudson (pioneer) for GA status. Absolutely no rush or anything (I can tell you're busy), but just wanted to shoot a ping and ask if you're still planning on reviewing it? Miniapolis also did a nice job copyediting it over the last few days. Thanks! ~SuperHamsterTalkContribs18:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent software changes
The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf17) is on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since August 14. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis on August 19, and on all Wikipedias on August 21 (calendar).
There is a new protection level called superprotection. At the moment, only some Wikimedia Foundation employees have access to it. Administrators can't edit "superprotected" pages. [15][16][17]
You can now create empty pages directly. A message asks you to confirm that you want to create an empty page. [18][19]
You can watch the first videos from Wikimania 2014. Some of them are about technical topics. More videos will come later.
Wikidata
After August 19, you can use Wikidata for inter language links on Wikinews. [21]
After August 19, you can use Wikidata for badges like "good" or "featured" articles. Next week, you will be able to show the badges in the article sidebar on Wikipedia, Wikisource and Wikiquote. [22]
Problems
There was an issue with ProofreadPage and WikiEditor on Wikisource wikis. It is now fixed. [23][24]
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Zan,
Would you mind reviewing another Sesame Street co-production for GAC, Plaza Sesamo? I unfortunately wasn't able to find as many sources as Iftah Ya Simsim, which you reviewed for GA, but I still think it's a charming little article. I'd really appreciate it; I'd really like to make the finals for the Wikicup this year, so your review would help me fulfill that personal goal. Thanks so much. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 02:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, just wanted to check in and see if you were still planning to review ON 407. I'm guessing it just got lost in your watchlist and that I'd attempt here. - Floydianτ¢13:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
The guy has a habit of accepting GAN reviews and then ignoring them, you're gonna have to find someone else. See earlier comments on his talk for proof.--ɱ(talk)17:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
VisualEditor news
From Thursday, Internet Explorer 11 users will get VisualEditor. Support for earlier versions is coming next. [25][26][27]
Future software changes
The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf20) is on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since September 4. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis on September 9, and on all Wikipedias on September 11 (calendar).
You will soon confirm a "Thanks" inline instead of in a dialog. [28]
You can read more about the plan to move to Phabricator, a tool that will help people develop the MediaWiki software and report bugs. [29]
Problems
There were problems with JavaScript and CSS on Friday, September 5 because of a code error.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent software changes
You can now change the style of links to disambiguation pages. This is done with the mw-disambigCSS class. [30][31]
There was a problem on right-to-left wikis with Wikidata log entries. The text was messy in watchlists and recent changes. The problem is now fixed. The same problem will be fixed soon for user names. [32][33][34]
New users are randomly chosen for a test on 12 Wikipedias. They get messages with ideas of articles to edit. The ideas come from what they have already edited. [35]
Problems
There was a problem with loading images on September 10. [36]
VisualEditor news
If you don't select text when you add a link, the link now shows a number. [37]
The citation tool no longer offers to reuse a citation if there are none on the page yet. [38][39]
You can now use help buttons in the "Page settings" menu to see what the options are for. [40]
Future software changes
The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf21) is on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since September 11. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis on September 16, and on all Wikipedias on September 18 (calendar).
These changes are coming with the new version:
If you use Internet Explorer 7, JavaScript will no longer work. JavaScript tools and scripts will no longer work in that browser. You should update to a newer browser. [41][42][43]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Moreau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 01:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero Muller until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. j⚛e deckertalk19:49, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent software changes
You can test a new Beta Feature called HHVM. It should make editing faster. Please report bugs if you see them. [44]
Problems
There was a problem on the English Wikipedia on September 19. It was due to edits on a template used on many pages.
Sites were down for users in the Pacific area around 7:00 UTC on September 20. It was due to a problem in the San Francisco data center.
There were two bad bugs messing up articles in some browsers in VisualEditor. We fixed the bugs and updated the sites. [45][46]
Software changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf22) is on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since September 18. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis on September 23, and on all Wikipedias on September 25 (calendar).
If you have more than 2000 notifications, the oldest ones will be removed.[47][48]
In the "Vector" skin, the icon used for users will show a neutral gender. [49][50]
The VisualEditor template tool now tells you if a required field is missing. [51]
The "Cancel" button of the VisualEditor save window is now called "Resume editing". This shows that you can still edit and you won't lose your changes. [52]
There are new keyboard shortcuts in VisualEditor. Use Ctrl+Shift+6 for code and Ctrl+Shift+5 for strikethrough. [53][54]
In VisualEditor, you can now see that you are switching to the source editing mode. Before, it was not clear it was happening. [55]
Future site changes
You can see a plan for the move to Phabricator. It's the new tool to track bugs. A guided tour will be done via video on September 24. [56]
Welcome to the GA Cup! In less than 72 hours, the competition will begin! Before you all start reviewing nominations we want to make sure you understand the following:
This is a friendly competition so we don't want any cheating/breaking of the rules. However, if you do believe someone is going against the rules, notify the judges. All the rules are listed here.
If you are a new editor or new to reviewing Good article nominations, it is imperative that you read the 4 essays/guides listed under FAQ #4. If you do not understand something, ask a judge for clarification ASAP!
The competition is not entirely about who can review the most nominations. Per the "Scoring" page, there is different criteria in which you can earn more points. Theoretically, you could review 10 nominations and have 80 points but another user could have reviewed 5 nominations and have 100 points. Yes, we want you to review as many nominations as you can as this will greatly increase the number of points you earn, but you must also keep in mind that every single review will be looked over by a judge. If we find that you are "rubber-stamping" (in other words, the review is not complete but you still passed/failed the article) you may be disqualified without warning.
Also, rather than creating a long list on what to remember, make sure you have read the "Scoring", "Submissions", and "FAQ" pages.
Now for the one question that we guarantee you have: how on earth will the rounds work???
Yes, we never actually had a solid platform regarding how the rounds would work because we had no idea how many people would sign-up. Even though the competition is about to begin, because sign-ups are still open, it is impossible to say exactly how each round will work. As of now, we can confirm that Round 1 will have everyone compete in one big pool. Depending on the final number of participants after sign-ups close, a to-be-determined number of participants will move on (highest scorers will move on) to Round 2. We guarantee that the top 15 will move on, so make sure you aim for those top positions! Moving on to Round 2, participants will be split into pools of even numbers (for example, every pool will have 6 participants). The pools will be determined by a computer program that places participants by random. More details regarding Round 2 will be sent out at the end of Round 1.
It is important to note that the GA Cup will run on UTC time, so make sure you know what time that is for where you live! On that note, the GA Cup will start on October 1 at 0:00:01 UTC; Round 1 will end on October 29 at 23:59:59 UTC; Round 2 will commence on November 1 at 0:00:01 UTC. All reviews must be started after or on the start time of the round. If you qualify for Round 2 but do not complete a review before the end of Round 1, the review can be carried over to Round 2; however that review will not count for Round 1. Prior to the start of the the second round, participants who qualify to move on will be notified.
Finally, if you know anyone else that might be interesting in participating, let them know! Sign-ups close on October 15 so there is still plenty of time to join in on the action!
If you have any further questions, contact one of the judges or leave a message here.
On October 16 or 17, 2014, check the Pools page as we will post the exact number of participants that will move on to the next round. Because this number will be determined past the halfway mark of Round 1, we encourage you to aim to be in the top 15 as the top 15 at the end of the round are guaranteed to move on.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
There are now many more translations for language names. [60]
Software changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf1) is on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since September 25. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis on September 30, and on all Wikipedias on October 2 (calendar).
Errors from Scribunto (Lua) are now shown on the page. Before, you had to click on "Script error" to see them. [61][62]
You can add an "autovalue" for a field in TemplateData. When users add the template to a page, the value will be added automatically. An example is when a clean-up template shows the date it was added. [63]
If you change a user preference but don't save it, it now asks if you want to save it. [64][65]
The PDF export tool has changed. The new one has better language support but it doesn't offer ZIM and EPUB formats. [66]
JavaScript authors: Many old methods will be removed soon. Please check your scripts and gadgets and replace the old methods by the new ones if needed. [67]
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I noticed that you are a major user in good article nominee reviewing, taking part in the GA Cup, and suggest you to review the Tim Frazier article. I have put a lot of effort into writing nearly the whole article, and would like to see what changes it may need in order to achieve good article status. Temple of the Mousy (talk) 15:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
As we move into the middle of Round 1, we wanted to report some of the lessons we've learned thus far, as well as announce a major rule change going into Round 2, which begins November 1. Remember, sign-ups for this year's Cup ends on September 15.
Thus far, we're very happy with the results of the competition. One of our major goals, reducing the long backlog at GAN, is well on the way to being accomplished, mostly due to the enthusiastic efforts of Jonas Vinther, who has earned over 250 points. Over 80 reviews have been made thus far. Thank you all for your efforts and for your part in making the GA Cup a success.
However, this is the inaugural year of the GA Cup, so there have been some unforeseen circumstances that have come up. One has been a glaring inadequacy with the rules, which the judges feel makes the competition unfair. As a result, there will be a major change in the rules, starting at the beginning of Round 2:
Your review must provide feedback/suggestions for improvement, and then you must wait until the nominator has responded and all issues/suggestions have been resolved before you can pass the article. Failure to follow this rule will result in disqualification.
What this means is that you must provide some feedback to the article's nominator, and must wait for him or her to respond before passing the article. If the nominator has not responded in the standard 7 days, you can fail the article. We're instituting this rule change to prevent the possibility of competitors passing articles for the sake of passing articles (or failing them) and to gain more points. We believe that the change will make it more fair to all competitors in the GA Cup.
Also, in case you haven't noticed, we increased the "guarantee" for Round 2 to 25 participants. The exact number will be decided in the near future.
We thank your for your participation, and for your flexibility and understanding as we learn what works and what doesn't work in this competition.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf3) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since 9 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from 14 October, and on all Wikipedias from 16 October (calendar).
5% of logged-out readers are getting pages from servers that run the HHVM tool. HHVM should make pages load faster. You can also test it as a Beta Feature. [72]
Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Hi, and thanks for the recent reviews of my GANs. Legobot had a bit of a coughing fit over the Uncanny Tales GA; see here. As a result your GA review count is now very impressive. I don't know if you can just reset this manually or would have to poke the bot operator, but I thought I should let you know. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Haha. I was just going to leave this same note. We should just leave it until Zanium has more GA reviews than there are GAs. :P Protonk (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oh boy! Since the glitch happened after the GA Cup started, do they count for that? I saw the talk page bot error discussion your referenced, but I'm not sure what to revert the number to, so maybe I'll just strike it out for now. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Next week's newsletter: "Zanimum is in the lead with PHP_INT_MAX points!" Also if legobot is just incrementing a number striking it or turning it into something that won't cast to an integer will probably cause it to flub again. Ahhhh...bots. Protonk (talk) 22:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
The judges have learned a great deal in this first part of the competition, and we appreciate your patience with us as we've figured out what works and what doesn't work. As we reported in our last newsletter, an inadequacy in the scoring system has been illuminated in the past 15 days, which has resulted in a major change in the rules. It has also resulted in one withdrawal.
To ensure fairness, we've decided to further increase the number of participants moving onto Round 2. Everyone who has reviewed at least one article will automatically be moved forward, and will be placed in pools. You have until October 29 to take advantage of this opportunity. It is our hope that this will make up for the unforeseen glitch in our scoring system.
Best of wishes to all of you as you continue to help improve articles and make Wikipedia a better place.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peel Region municipal elections, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McKay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. You can read translations.
Recent changes
You can test a new system to see math using MathML. Go to your display options and choose "⧼mw math mathml⧽".
You can add badges in Wikidata for quality articles and featured lists. [76][77]
File information cleanup
You can join a wiki project to help tools read file information. It will help people reuse files.
See how to fix metadata. You can fix it by adding markers to templates and adding templates to files.
You can see a list of files missing machine-readable information on your wiki.
Developers fixed a security problem. If you use Internet Explorer 6, you won't be able to log in any more. You should use a newer browser. [79]
Changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf4) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since October 16. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from October 21, and on all Wikipedias from October 23 (calendar).
10% of logged-out readers are getting pages from servers that run the HHVM tool. HHVM should make pages load faster. You can also test it as a Beta Feature. [80]
If you add the same parameter twice in a template, it now puts the page in a tracking category. [81][82]
I've just checked on the good articles talk page whether I can simply reopen the GA1, or whether you officially have to renominate the article, and I quick pass the GA2. Doesn't seem worth it to start a GA2, when all issues have been addressed less than an hour after I closed the GA1. -- Zanimum (talk) 15:19, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Just wanted to remind you that the review is still open (no need to hurry, I can see by your talk page that you're a busy user). Thanks again for reviewing the article!--GDuwenTell me!19:00, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Hello. I see you posted the Canadian shooting at ITN. Traditionally, moving something to the main page includes closing its nomination at WP:ITNC and resetting the timer. I guess you weren't aware of that. I've done it for you on this occasion. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
You also replaced the image without shifting "(pictured)" to the correct item. More importantly, you didn't upload a local copy of the image, as stressed in the yellow banner with a red "ATTENTION" heading and blinking "stop" symbol. (And for some reason, you mislabeled the edit "minor" and included no summary, thereby reducing the likelihood of another administrator noticing the errors immediately.)
Fortunately, KrinkleBot cascade-protected the image at Commons approximately four minutes later. This sometimes takes hours to occur, even when the bot is operational. (There have been several outages – including one earlier this month, during which a vandal replaced a photograph appearing on the main page with this(warning: NSFW pornography).
To be clear, I'm sure that you had only good intentions. Also, I realize that you're Canadian (and I don't mean to be insensitive or uncaring). But I respectfully request that you not edit a main page section without first familiarizing yourself with its established process. Thank you. —David Levy18:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
@David Levy: Point taken. I was just trying to be bold and get something up there. I apologize for not following procedure–I'm frankly unsure I've edited the template since 2006–but it was mostly an attempt to end the conversation, given that consensus seemed stably favourable, yet no one was taking action. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I saw you're an experienced GA reviewer and I was wondering if you'd be kind enough to review Kajaani (a Finnish municipality) for me. I have had one GA in the past (Mikkeli, another Finnish municipality). If you don't want to or don't have time to that's fine. :) Regards, --AmaryllisGardenertalk18:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
@AmaryllisGardener: Thanks for the offer, but I don't think I'd end up passing it. You'd be better off waiting and seeing whether someone else would be more apt. The history and economy sections are strong, but you need more meat on much of the article. The river allows fishing, but is there any source talking about how it interacts with the human population? Did the town grow around the river initially, before expanding to its modern borders? Are the roads a linear grid, or at various angles from the different eras of growth? The theatre: does it host outside acts, or are there local bands or theatre troupes? Or a mix of both? Are the recreation facilities municipally owned/managed, or private? What about the Hokki Kajaani, or any other intracity leagues that have teams in town? It's a foundation for an article, but not ready just yet. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Zanimum. You have new messages at Talk:Mississauga/GA1. Message added 18:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Movie dvd cover the hound of baskerville.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Wilhelmina Will has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!
'"On Psych, A USA Network TV series Episode 8, The Tao of Gus, Season 6, Shawn refers to pumpkins as "Halloween Apples" because he thinks all round fruits are a type of apple.
Wednesday saw the end of Round 1. Jaguar took out Round 1 with an amazing score of 238. In a tight race for second, Peacemaker67 and Ritchie333 finished second and third with 152 and 141 points, respectively.
Two users have scored the maximum five bonus points for article length (60,000 characters+). Anotherclown reviewed Spanish conquest of Yucatán (77,350 characters) and MrWooHoo reviewed Communist Party of China (76,740 characters). The longest review was by Bilorv who reviewedCaldas da Rainha. The review was approximately 22,400 characters which earned s/he two bonus points (20, 000 - 29, 999 characters).
In Round 1, 117 reviews were completed, making the first round of the GA Cup a success! A total of 86 articles were removed from the backlog during the month of October! We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 2 so we can lower the backlog as much as possible.
To qualify for the second round, one completed review was needed, which 28 users accomplished. Participants have been randomly put into 7 pools of 4; the top 2 in each pool will move onto Round 3. There will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 15th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 2 will start on November 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on November 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here
Also, remember that a major rule change will go into affect starting on November 1, which marks the beginning of Round Two. Round 1 displayed a weakness in the rules, which we are correcting with this new rule. We believe that this change will make the competition more inherently fair. The new rule is: Your review must provide feedback/suggestions for improvement, and then you must wait until the nominator has responded and all issues/suggestions have been resolved before you can pass the article. Failure to follow this rule will result in disqualification. The judges will strictly enforce this new rule.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
There was a bug in VisualEditor with Internet Explorer. It hid tools like the link editor when you opened them. The bug was fixed on Monday. [86]
Issues with the new search tool caused geo data code to show up on pages on Monday and Friday. The mobile "nearby" tool was also broken. The problem is now fixed. [87][88][89]
HHVM caused server issues on Thursday. They are now fixed.
Software changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf5) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since October 29. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 4, and on all Wikipedias from November 5 (calendar).
Some wikis have icons at the top of a page to show if it is protected or featured. Icons show up using CSS. You can now use the <indicator> tag in these templates instead to add the icons. [90][91]
VisualEditor now tells you if you're editing a re-used reference. This helps you avoid changing it if you just want to add a new one. [92]
The icons in VisualEditor's template editor tool for adding more fields are back, along with other fixes. [93][94][95][96][97]
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Zanimum. You have new messages at Talk:Mississauga/GA1. Message added 16:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent software changes
You may see a new tool on the mobile site of the English Wikipedia. It asks simple questions to make the article better. In the future, your answers will go to Wikidata. [102][103]
You can join two IRC chats this week to learn more about the file cleanup project. One will be on Wednesday at 18:00 (UTC) and the other on Thursday at 04:00 (UTC). You can ask questions during the chat if you need help to fix files on your wiki.
You can see a list of files to fix on the Labs tool. You can report bugs and ask questions on the talk page.
Problems
Wikimedia Labs was broken for a few hours on Thursday. It was due to a hardware problem. [105]
Software changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf7) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 5. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 11, and on all Wikipedias from November 12 (calendar).
You can now use more editing tools for tables in VisualEditor. You can add rows and columns, merge cells, and edit table captions. [106][107]
The style and insert menus in the toolbar of VisualEditor now show fewer tools. This helps you see the most common tasks. You can see all items by clicking "More". [108]
The way windows inside VisualEditor work has changed. VisualEditor should be faster and have fewer bugs. [109]
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Zanimum. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "C. A. Irvine".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:C. A. Irvine}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I saw Talk:Pig Bride/GA1 after I returned and did the fixes, but you missed my ping I guess. I cleaned up the issues and renominated it, but because you had to fail it due to inactivity, I was hoping you could review it again. It only makes sense because you reviewed it originally and sense you are now familiar with the page. I remade the Good Article nomination and you can see it on Talk:Pig Bride. Hope to hear from you soon. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Software changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf8) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 12. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 18, and on all Wikipedias from November 19 (calendar).
The new search tool ("CirrusSearch") will be on the English Wikipedia from November 19. [110]
Move from Bugzilla to Phabricator
The tool to track bugs will change on November 21.
You won't be able to add or edit bugs between November 21 and November 24.
A note to Zanimum that this GAN review, which you started on September 2, will be closed unless you return to finish it (or start to finish it) the next time you edit, or November 22, whichever is earlier. It is grossly unfair to the nominator to have this level of delay, and it's something that has happened time and time again with your GA reviews. (If the nominator insists, we may close it sooner, to get it into the reviewing pool sooner.) You also have the following other GAN reviews awaiting your attention:
Talk:Loving You (1957 film)/GA1 (opened October 1; partial review on October 20; fixes posted the next day not yet replied to)
I'd like to suggest that you delete the Katherine Pulaski nomination, since it's been nearly a month since you opened it. I'll be putting it back into the reviewing pool if you haven't done so by the time the Missisauga is closed. I'd like to suggest that you voluntarily limit yourself to one or maybe two reviews at any one time, since it's clear you cannot handle more in a timely manner. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
While you've done some really good reviews of GAN's, Zanimum, I have to agree with BlueMoonset that you shouldn't review so many at once- especially when not able to keep up with them all. Snuggums (talk / edits)22:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Agree with Blue. You've been told many times to stop taking on a bunch at once when you usually abandon the majority of them. I don't want to start enforcing a restriction on you but clearly we're going to have to. Wizardman04:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Zanimum, I see you've posted here once today. It's been a week since the above, and you've remained inactive except for that post. Of the five reviews listed above, Missisauga was closed at the (discouraged) nominator's request, Charles Aznavour was put back in the to-be-reviewed pool, and Katherine Pulaski was deleted, putting it back in the pool as well. This is to inform you that remaining two will join them in the pool shortly, unless you take action on them. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:12, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
The move from Bugzilla to Phabricator is done. You can now report bugs in Phabricator. [112]
Problems
There was a problem when editing tables in VisualEditor. VisualEditor was trying to fix bad values for the colspan or rowspan option. VisualEditor now leaves the bad values to avoid making things worse. This was fixed on November 17. [113]
Software changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki (1.25wmf9) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 19. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 25, and on all Wikipedias from November 26 (calendar).
You will be able to try VisualEditor on many new wikis for the first time. After November 26, VisualEditor will become available on Wikidata, Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikinews wikis. You can find it in your Beta options. [114]
VisualEditor now tells you if your edit needs to be approved. [115]
You can now use VisualEditor's tools directly when you resume editing after closing the save window. [116]
VisualEditor's table editing tools now work better in right-to-left languages. [117][118]
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!