Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Voorts 84 2 4 98 Open 21:06, 8 November 2024 5 days, 14 hours no report

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

edit

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Congrats!

edit

G'day Hawkeye, congrats on being re-elected lead coord! Thanks for all your attention to detail and work for the project. Warm regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I have been in Europe at Wikimania and the Paralympics for the past month but am back now. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-40

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations from the Military History Project

edit
  Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history)
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for participating in 10 reviews between July and September 2024. Donner60 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Tech News: 2024-41

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: September 2024

edit
 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

DYK for Santa (singer)

edit

On 13 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Santa (singer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Santa opened the 2024 Summer Paralympics closing ceremony (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Santa (singer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Santa (singer)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hook update
Your hook reached 24,361 views (1,015.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 2024 Summer Paralympics closing ceremony

edit

On 13 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2024 Summer Paralympics closing ceremony, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Santa opened the 2024 Summer Paralympics closing ceremony (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Santa (singer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2024 Summer Paralympics closing ceremony), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Typo

edit

Just wanted to let you know, while you still have a chance to fix it, that you have a typo in your self-nomination statement (blacked vs blocked). Good luck! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that! I have corrected it. Any suggestions welcome. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-42

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 21:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Fram (talk) 18:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 2024 Summer Paralympics opening ceremony

edit

On 16 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2024 Summer Paralympics opening ceremony, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2024 Summer Paralympics opening ceremony featured dancing Phryges? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2024 Summer Paralympics opening ceremony. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2024 Summer Paralympics opening ceremony), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

TFA

edit
 
story · music · places

Thank you today for Galileo project, "about a robotic space mission to Jupiter. This article is about the mission; there is a separate article about the spacecraft itself."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

What a great article, Hawkeye7. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! I started with a paragraph in the Centaur (rocket stage) article that talked about Shuttle-Centaur. I was intrigued and created an article on it. From there I went on to expand the article on Galileo, as it was one of the intended payloads. Thanks for your comment; it is always heartening to hear that someone read and enjoyed an article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections: Candidate instructions

edit
Administrator Elections | Instructions for candidates

Thank you for choosing to run in the October 2024 administrator elections. This bulletin contains some important information about the next stages of the election process.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 15–21: SecurePoll setup phase
  • October 22–24: Discussion phase
  • October 25–31: SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–?: Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the SecurePoll setup phase. Your candidate subpage will remain closed to questions and discussion. However, this is an excellent opportunity for you to recruit nominators (if you want them) and have them place their nomination statements, and a good time for you to answer the standard three questions, if you have not done so already. We recommend you spend the SecurePoll setup phase from October 15–21 getting your candidate page polished and ready for the next phase.

The discussion phase will take place from October 22–24. Your candidate subpage will open to the public and they will be permitted to discuss you and ask you formal questions, in the same style as a request for adminship (RfA). Please make sure you are around on those dates to answer the formal questions in a timely manner.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. Anyone can see who has voted, but not who they voted for. You are permitted and encouraged to vote in the election, including voting for yourself. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see your tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RfA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, you must have received at least 70% support, calculated as support ÷ (support + oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("'crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation as a candidate, and best of luck.

You're receiving this message because you are a candidate in the October 2024 administrator elections.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

edit

DYK for Catharina Weiss

edit

On 20 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Catharina Weiss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Catharina Weiss (pictured) used to play for the Rolling Chocolate? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Catharina Weiss. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Catharina Weiss), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Our Admin Election Test

edit

Hello there. As we're preparing to move from one stage to the next, this is just a quick note from one member of the test group to another, wishing you well in the process of this new alternative to RfA. It seems that there are more of us in this group than some in the community anticipated, so i hope that doesn't make the experience any the worse for all of us. Whatever our individual results, i thank you, along with the rest, for stepping up and testing this process; happy days, ~ LindsayHello 07:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Best wishes to you too. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Best wishes to you both, to all those who offered themselves up, and the entire community in this test of wikipolitics. It's not fun. Sorry if I drew undue attention to you today, dude. I couldn't just stay silent today. BusterD (talk) 20:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! I am glad you did. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
You and I know how much is involved in high-quality reviews, so I know it's a lot of time investment. Not very many admins spend THAT MUCH time reviewing others' work. Lead Coord can be a nightmare! Thought normies should know the numbers. I'll save my second question. We actually need you to get the mop this time. BusterD (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just voted for you. Good luck! 🤞 Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-43

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in a research

edit

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

  Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Responding to your question

edit

Optional question from SilkTork

17. Could you explain what you mean by this statement you made in response to Q9: "The third finding was particularly embarrassing to the arbs because they voted for a finding of fact that one of their number, Newyorkbrad, pointed out at the time was not true." In relation to the finding that you had been previously admonished, all the Arbs active in the case supported it, including Newyorkbrad: [28]. (NYB added a comment later in response to Hersfold's feeling that the Civility case also related to involvement, which NYB didn't agree with - but that was a side issue, and not what we were voting on). To offer some clarity to people who might take your assertion for fact, I am not at all embarrassed that I supported a clearly obvious finding of which NYB said: "that Hawkeye7 was sanctioned in the case is a historical fact" 10:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
A:. Why would you vote on something if you didn't feel it was germane to the case? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
That you had been admonished by ArbCom for using the blocking tool inappropriately was very clearly germane to the case, and was a significant deciding factor in you being desysopped for again using the blocking tool inappropriately. That you still don't understand the reason why you were desysopped, and feel that ArbCom were wrong, is not very encouraging. My views now are pretty much the same as my views then: that you are a valuable member of the community, and are clearly not a bad person. You made actions that you felt were in the best interests of the project; and there are many folks that would support your actions, or, at the least, understand your actions. And I feel that neither action by itself would amount to a desysop - it was the one following the other that tipped matters over. And I felt that you would be one of those rare folks who would get your tools back at a RFA because of your good work and that the desysopping was largely technical. But each time you have asked for the tools back you have acted in a manner where you want to blame ArbCom for the desysopping without showing understanding of the reasons why.
It's all water under the bridge now, as people will vote as they will based on what's already been said, but I feel that it is a shame that you cannot accept what happened, and move on. I understand your position though, because it happened to me. I failed in my first RFA because of an incident where I felt I was in the right. Indeed, I felt somewhat resentful that nobody was understanding me, and it took me a long time to realise that I was actually in the wrong. It can be hard to make that shift in thinking. I hope you do get there. SilkTork (talk) 09:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your kind words. I accepted the verdict long ago. Moving on is of course much harder. I hope you can move on too. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Reading the election discussion and then this brought it all back to me. It was a difficult time and I don't know if I've ever directly apologised to you for my part in the events that led up to your desysop. I thought at the time I was doing the right thing, but I've had great cause to regret it ever since. I've since come to see you as a great editor and a valued colleague. I'm deeply sorry for the trouble my hotheaded mistake caused you all those years ago. I hope you're successful in the election; I've voted for you, for what it's worth. Keep well. John (talk) 13:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks John. I have long since come to see you as a valued colleague too. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Since my vote and comments in the "Civility enforcement" arbitration case are being discussed, please note that I opposed desysopping Hawkeye7 in that case. I opined there, albeit in lonely dissent, that the remedy was a significant overreaction and observed that the matter would likely never have come to arbitration if not for a controversy involving a different editor. See my comments on the proposed decision page, particularly here. Newyorkbrad (talk) 15:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination

edit

I was off-wiki for a time and just got wind of your administrator nomination! I missed a chance to weigh in with my endorsement. Wishing you the best of luck! Figureofnine (talkcontribs) 15:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Voting is still going on. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Indeed! Not too late for that. Figureofnine (talkcontribs) 18:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-44

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue 222, October 2024

edit
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

edit

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is   AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion,   BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place,   Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are:   Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points,   Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points,   BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points,   Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and   AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply