User talk:Taavi/Archive 3

Latest comment: 3 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 27 June 2021
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

15:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Original Barnstar
U are awesome
 Lemme learn cuse im not smart (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

new user

How to add biography of our own. can i get details from you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhilashmanagave (talkcontribs) 07:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey Abhilashmanagave, I'm sorry but I'm not exactly sure what you are asking. Could you try wording it differently? Thanks.  Majavah talk · edits 10:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

21:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

MajavahBot

Hi Majavah, hope you are doing well. Your MajavahBot has been stopped it's task 1 at WP:EFFPR, could you please check and do the needful. Thanks! Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@ZI Jony: The bot broke on a malformed report. Now that you removed that report the bot should be working again. Thanks for letting me know.  Majavah talk · edits 17:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
I also hope it will work find. Thanks for your reply. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 19:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

User scripts

Hello Majavah,
I plan on deleting one of my user scripts, User:Interstellarity/Semi-protected edit requests.js that you are using. If you still want to use and maintain it, please make a copy in your own userspace. I'm not very good with user scripts and I don't feel comfortable having control over them. Thank you for your understanding. Interstellarity (talk) 14:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

16:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

new bio profile

Hello Majavah ,

I would like to add the Bio data of a scientist Known to me who is working nano Technology and Cancer Research.

Please let me know the process of Successfully Adding such profiles.

Thanks In Advance

Abhilash Managave — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhilashmanagave (talkcontribs) 07:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Apologies for the late reply, but if you are still interested in this please see WP:YFA.  Majavah talk · edits 11:55, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

15:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

16:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

17:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

16:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

MajavahBot 4 approved

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MajavahBot 4 has been approved. Please see that page and ping me if you have any questions. Happy editing!   --TheSandDoctor Talk 02:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

15:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

17:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports, you may be blocked from editing. Your bot is disruptive. Drmies (talk) 01:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

@Drmies: Lolwut? Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
No, not LOL. Those useless automated instantaneous reports prevent admins from reverting IPs that file empty reports that require no action but a revert. It's really irritating and discourages editing. Drmies (talk) 02:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
@Drmies: So use a personalized message, instead of templating an established user for running an approved bot task. I'm fine with the bot, and I suspect most other users are too. It takes only a few clicks to blank a section, if you wish. But since we did away with creating a permanent archive, there's less of a need to remove reports nowadays.
And why did you warn the IP? The most common reason for these no-filters-triggered reports is that they tripped an account-creation filter. Based on the timestamp, that means they were trying to create the account "You Cant Stop Rock" which doesn't seem obviously disruptive, unless there's some LTA I'm not aware of. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
@Drmies: Just deployed a patch that should stop it from edit warring after being rollbacked, otherwise you'll need to be more specific on how it is disruptive. As Suffusion of Yellow said, it's an approved bot task, and at least I consider it really useful when patrolling EFFPR. Majavah (talk!) 06:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Majavah, I'm sorry for losing my temper, and I am glad you saw why. I patrol that page fairly recently and in many cases the reports are worth nothing and need no further comment; rolling back a BS report is a valid option. I understand you want this bot to work fast, but for admins who work that page like I do it's too fast. I don't know about the process the bot went through; I hope, I assume that experienced admins were in on it. But personally, I have grumbled more than once at the bot. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
@Drmies: Looks like MajavahBot is on Twinkle's "trusted bot" list. So if you use Twinkle's "vandalism" button instead of plain MediaWiki rollback, you can revert both MajavahBot's and the preceding user's edits with one click. Same trick works with SineBot. But I'm still not clear why you removed that report and warned the IP, unless it was a CU/OS thing. We do need a better way to handle FPs with account creation filters, but that's not the user's fault. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 16:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK run?

The bot was running for a while, but there's still many remaining in Category:Pages with a missing DYK entry. I don't really understand the purpose of User:MajavahBot/DYK blurb not found. I don't see why running against the category wouldn't prevent 'duplicate processing', but it would be nice to have the category cleared by the weekend since that's the next time JL-bot will do a DYK report run. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Headbomb: The recent ToolsDB maintenance and some non-standard date formats have been causing issues with my bot. User:MajavahBot/DYK blurb not found is used to filter out pages where my bot couldn't find a DYK entry when processing it, for example when finding out old page names was broken that page allowed my bot to continue processing other pages. Majavah (talk!) 10:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
@Headbomb: It has finished processing all pages where bold link pointed to one of that talk page's current or previous names. Based on my spot checks the remaining ~550 pages are either ones which appeared on the main page before the talk page was created (just finished processing those), use a redirect or a template to create the bolded link or just don't have any traces of them in the linked DYK archive. Majavah (talk!) 15:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Well... taking a look at Talk:68-pounder gun (16 May 2010), there is Wikipedia:Recent_additions/2010/May#17_May_2010 with

Since 68-pounder redirects to 68-pounder gun, this should be a match. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

For boats articles, the links from

(and redirects of those templates, like {{Warship}} / {{Ship}}). I'll add more patterns as I find them. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

That would take care of ~124 DYKs, btw. Most of the others seem to be missing from the archives, or erroneously tagged as DYKs. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

A few more (e.g. Talk:Zarqa River) could be done by checking Special:WhatLinksHere, finding Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/January or Wikipedia:Recent additions 238, and then searching for bolded Zarqa River (or a redirect) in those entries. This would take care of several entries from one day that got archived the day after because it happens to be on a different page (e.g. 31 December vs 1 January). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

17:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 18

Speedy deletion nomination of Vastaamo

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vastaamo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.security.nl/posting/675550/Spoedoverleg+Fins+kabinet+over+datadiefstal+psychotherapiepraktijk. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 16:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

16:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

 

Hello Taavi,

 

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
 
 
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Please don't threaten

It's against the Wikipedia standards that you are referring to please threaten, all I have done is put dubious to the statement not correct as per mainstream Islam. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 11:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Which policy am I violating? Majavah (talk!) 11:34, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

I have explained which one you are please see the noticeboard Azmarai76 (talk) 11:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Notice board

I have asked a simple question over Notice board about Ahmadiyaa belief on Messiah. Chiao Azmarai76 (talk) 11:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 19

20:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

MajavahBot on EFFP

Hi Majavah! The bot that archives on WP:EFFP doesn't seem to performing the ArchiveNow function. It started with the current item at the top of the page, which has some wikicode and Chinese characters in it, which may be messing up the bot? ArchiveNow would not work there, so I tried adding it to the next item down and it still does not. As far as I can tell, the bot is archiving threads based on age properly, except for the top one which is what brought this to mind. Thanks! CrowCaw 16:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Crow Fixed, thanks! The raw signature in the first one made the bot think it just added a comment there which prevented it from being archived and for some reason "archive now" was configured as "archive in two hours". Majavah (talk!) 16:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Script

Hello Majavah, is there a way I can make this script work on Wikibooks. The creator is inactive so I thought of asking an experienced script creator. Thanks --Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 18:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Synoman Barris Yes, see b:User:Majavah/script-redlinks. Majavah (talk!) 18:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Majavah, Thank you so much Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 18:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2021 Pakistani television series debuts

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 Pakistani television series debuts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of February 2020

 

A tag has been placed on Category:CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of February 2020 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

15:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

15:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2021 in Uzbekistani football

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 in Uzbekistani football requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Roads in Bicol has been nominated for renaming

 

Category:Roads in Bicol has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 14:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:December 2021 sports events in South America

 

A tag has been placed on Category:December 2021 sports events in South America requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

MajavahBot and public/private filter mix

Hello, Majavah. Any chance anything can be done about users like [74] and EFFP reports? They have an edit which is disallowed by public filter and logged by private filter, but MajavahBot still leaves the {{effp|p|bot}}. I think it would make more sense to add the template only if the most recent warn or disallow was from a private filter. Thanks!. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

@Suffusion of Yellow: Hi, yes, this should be possible, I'll try to find some time to implement this. Majavah (talk!) 16:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

18:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:December 2021 events in South America

 

A tag has been placed on Category:December 2021 events in South America requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2021 Portuguese television series debuts

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 Portuguese television series debuts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 20

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2021 establishments in Portugal

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 establishments in Portugal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2014 Asian Games football templates

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2014 Asian Games football templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

About Zeyan shafiq

Dear i want to told something. First the boy post ad in this news media by paying money second the e sport team is not famous enough. The best thing is that the boy breaks the law of government. If this will be in Wikipedia many boys break the rule of govt for verifying their social handle. Think deeply. By the way in youtube there are many video on building app. It is not courage able. Please delete this. This would be concern for indian authority. Think deeply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.127.95.163 (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

While you're free to nominate that page to AfD if you believe there is a good reason for it to be deleted, just the fact that an article subject has done something that is illegal somewhere doesn't mean that we shouldn't include it. Majavah (talk!) 14:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2014 Asian Games templates

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2014 Asian Games templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  Hey, Majavah. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 

Happy First Edit Day!

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

Help with bots

Hey there, Majavah! :))

I was wondering if you can help me with some pywikibot tricks given the operation of your Majavahbot. Can you tell me how exactly do you make the bot get commands from the wikipages like you've done here? I also operate a pywikibot and it would be good if I could somehow devise an emergency shutdown procedure for it by using something similar as to what you've done there. Or even if that's not possible, the knowledge of knowing how to get commands from wikipages could be pretty useful in other different scenarios where you want other people to help with its operation on minor details. - Klein Muçi (talk) 23:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi! MajavahBot is massively overengineered but the code for task configuration looks like this. It just loads the contents of that page using pywikibot, uses a very hacky regex to remove comments and then uses the python json module to parse it to a python dictionary. Is that clear enough or do you need more details? Majavah (talk!) 06:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the fast response! :)) Unfortunately, no, it isn't but I believe that's coming from my own shortcoming in technical knowledge. I've just started dealing with pywikibot these past months and maybe that's a far advanced thing for me to do right now. Thank you anyway! :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 11:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Trying my luck here... Maybe you can help with this request? As far as I understand, I imagine it to be rather easy, just 1 missing argument or so in the bash script. But I can't figure it out. - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
@Klein Muçi Can't you just make your custom summary include the general summary you want? Majavah (talk!) 07:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Well... That's exactly what I'm asking... :P Reading the instructions at that page I know how I can make a custom summary, a message that appears after every edit that my bot makes. It's easy: -summary:Blablabla. Now I want that beside that message the specific edit that was made to be also included. But I don't know how to do that. :P - Klein Muçi (talk) 10:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
@Klein Muçi (sorry for the late reply) I'm not familiar with how Pywikibot internally works with the -summary parameter, I'm afraid I'm not the best person to help with this, I can try anyway. Did I understand correctly that you have both the command line parameter summary and the per-edit summary approached working individually? Majavah (talk!) 18:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry. Yes, as far as I know, yes. According to the instructions here, -summary:XYZ Set the summary message text, bypassing the default edit summaries. if you write -summary:something, you get the same message predefined message all the time as a summary. Which is what my bot has right now. And, if I remember correctly, if you omit that parameter, you get a per-edit specific summary added automatically by the Wikipedia/Wikiquote/whatever wikisite you're using the bot on itself. It has been a while without using this approach so that's why I talk with uncertainty but yes, the idea is that basically I should know how to use use both approaches. I wanted to have them combined and I thought I would only have to add 1 more word/command to that -summary:XYZ part, but I can't find that answered anywhere on the documentation pages. - Klein Muçi (talk) 09:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

@Klein Muçi I've been looking around how pwb works but haven't really found any solutions for you. Sorry. Majavah (talk!) 08:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Don't worry. Thank you a lot for trying! :)) - Klein Muçi (talk) 09:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

Help

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter/False_positives/Reports Would you please take care of this for me. I am User:Stretchrunner with no choice but to edit as "II". Thanks. Stretchrunner II (talk) 13:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Stretchrunner II, I can't see private filters like the one you've hit. You've already posted about it on the right place (WP:Edit filter/False positives), that's frequently patrolled by people with access to see those. Best, Majavah (talk!) 16:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

A barnstar for you!

  The Technical Barnstar
Thank you very much for your patient, step-by-step help with my Toolforge Kubernetes cronjob questions. You walked me through my multiple noob Linux mistakes like a champ. I appreciate your time. –Novem Linguae (talk) 12:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Novem Linguae Glad that you got it working. The Kubernetes part should get significantly easier once we (Toolforge admins) get some work-in-progress tooling out. Majavah (talk!) 17:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Twinkle - GitHub

Hey there, Majavah! Long time no see. :)

Lately, a user posted this message on my talk page on SqWiki:

https://github.com/wikimedia-gadgets/twinkle-starter

Are there any developers here that can help with this? Thanks!

Basically Twinkle i18n if I'm not wrong. Given that I've also thought about that in the past, I wanted to help personally and started to deal with it. I (re)opened my GitHub account and wanted to follow the instructions mentioned in the readme part on the aforementioned link but I get stuck on the first step. After I press "use this template", I can't name my repo. It reads "not found" and from what I saw on the web, most likely I'm missing some kind of permission. Can you help by guiding me around the process? I've never got to work with GitHub before (that's the reason why I closed my account the first time :P ). I saw your name on the contributors there and thought maybe you'd be the right person to ask.

I'm also a bit surprised about the whole thing. I've helped i18n many gadgets and extensions in the past (WikiLove, SandboxLink, etc.) but I've never had to deal with GitHub (or anything outside of the "WikiWorld" for that matter) before. Everything could be fixed by changing some pages on the Mediawiki namespace or translating some lines on TranslateWiki (of course, after asking for permission on Phabricator). Why is it different this time? Is Twinkle somehow an "unfinished product" that after having been developed/refined enough, will join the ranks of what I mentioned above? Or is this kind of workflow intended?

Anyway, based on my past experiences, I hope Twinkle's i18n will require mostly language translating with minor code work. - Klein Muçi (talk) 00:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Turns out the permission missing was me verifying the email address. Things ran smoothly after that. I still would appreciate any kind of help you can provide though as I'm still on the first steps. :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 01:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Some Twinkle code is indeed translated at translatewiki.net: translatewiki:Translating:Twinkle. Some extensions may be missing for various reasons. Nemo 06:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
@Klein Muçi Hi! For most of your questions I don't have any answers other than "because the Twinkle developers chose to", you should ask them, not me. I'm not familiar with it so I don't have any specific answers unfortunately. Majavah (talk!) 13:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

I see. Any guidance of who I would have to contact? :P Or you have no idea at all? - Klein Muçi (talk) 18:40, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

IDK, perhaps check out Wikipedia:Twinkle#History. Firestar464 (talk) 09:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
@Klein Muçi: I believe that would be User:SD0001. Majavah (talk!) 09:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! :) @SD0001: Can you help me by guiding me around on this? I tried it myself during this period but I couldn't really finish the process mentioned there. Klein Muçi (talk) 10:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@Klein Muçi Yes, you can reach me on my talk page or discord. Also feel free to give me commit access on your github repo so that I could help with some setup. The workflow is like this because the activities that Twinkle automates are quite different across wikis. For instance, for nominating pages for deletion on enwiki we use CSD, PROD, AfD, RfD, CfD, FfD, TfD, or MfD. Pretty sure you don't have all that on sqwiki! Because of this, i18n of twinkle needs more than just translation of strings. The core library provides some wiki-agnostic components which contain strings translated on translatewiki.net. These components have to be put together in twinkle-sqwiki. Some modules like revert/rollback will work out of box. But others like XFD, Tag, Warn need quite a bit of configuration. This is still a work-in-progress and there's still a lot that can be done to make the process easier for people like you. – SD0001 (talk) 12:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
@SD0001: I see. Thank you for your offer! I did join that server you mentioned (even though I'm not the most efficient user you can find of Discord) but I'm thinking to continue the subject on the talk page so it could be more public this time if other users are interested on it now or in the future. I'll give you permission on my GH repo and write you soon after. :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 22:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 21

Premature archival of EFFP report

MajavahBot prematurely archived a pending EFFP report that was yet to be checked by Edit filter managers Special:MobileDiff/1029391407. I restored and the bot archived again. Please fix it. A small delay in EFMs analysing a valid report hardly warrants archiving it. It is better to make sure it doesn't archive unless requests are resolved. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 18:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Never mind. I have pinned the report to prevent further archiving. Still it might be worth considering whether there should be any change in bot archiving duration. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 18:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2014 Asian Games convenience template navigational boxes

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2014 Asian Games convenience template navigational boxes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021