Interstellarity

Contentious topics

Disambiguation pages

I hope you are not too busy today. I noticed a lot of links to disambiguation pages stemming from your work. See here: https://dplbot.toolforge.org/templates_with_dab_links.php?limit=50&offset=0. Could you please fix those links? The Banner talk 20:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

@The Banner: Hi and thank you for reaching out. I can do it manually, but I would prefer not to. Not sure if this can fixed with AutoWikiBrowser. I'll reach out on Discord to see if there is an easy to fix this using automated tools. Interstellarity (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

In this case it are templates, so just 15 fixes. The Banner talk 21:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

@The Banner:  Done: Should be all fixed. Another editor helped out in fixing the remaining links. Interstellarity (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much. The Banner talk 20:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

"Man’s red fire" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Man’s red fire has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Man’s red fire until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

"Man’s red flower" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Man’s red flower has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Man’s red flower until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

"Man's red fire" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Man's red fire has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 29 § Man's red fire until a consensus is reached. Okmrman (talk) 04:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

• Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
• Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
• Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
• Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
• Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
• Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
• Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
• Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)