FilterDebugger edit

It looks like the implementation of ccnorm doesn't properly map '¡' to i. Special:AbuseLog/36337996 is currently shown as not a match. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 12:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

@0xDeadbeef: Thanks; looks like mw:Equivset has finally been updated! I'll rebuild with the newer version. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Should be fixed now. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
works now, thanks! 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 07:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
You might also want to keep an eye on phab:T357855. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, subscribed! Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

HAPPY HOLIDAYS 2023 edit

Frivolous topic edit

I have to wonder— is your username by any chance a reference to the I Ching calculator in The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul? 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

But of course. :-) Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

User script request edit

Hi. Now that I'm an EFM, I realize that it would be helpful to have a script that linked each warning/disallow message name (like "abusefilter-disallowed-WPWP-extendedconfirmed" on Special:AbuseFilter/1258 for example) to the relevant message (MediaWiki:abusefilter-disallowed-WPWP-extendedconfirmed). Any chance you would be interested in writing such a script? If not I can take a crack at it but you seem to have cornered the market on edit filter-related scripts so I figured I'd ask. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 20:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@DannyS712: I'm not really all that active right now; plus I have maybe 20 or so unfinished scripts that I'd rather get to first. If you want this done, go for it! Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 01:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Suffusion of Yellow okay, User:DannyS712/AbuseFilterMessageLinks.js --DannyS712 (talk) 09:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Improving Filter 1045 edit

Hi Suffusion of Yellow, do you think the additions of {{Close paraphrasing}} could also be added to line 9? Thanks Nobody (talk) 14:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@1AmNobody24: Thanks,   Done. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Technical Barnstar
This is absolutely amazing, thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Thanks! Always nice to know someone other than me is using these tools. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 24 edit

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I edit

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

  • Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
  • Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
  • Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
  • Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
  • Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
  • Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
  • Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
  • Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
  • Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
  • Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
  • Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
  • Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
  • Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
  • Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
  • Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
  • Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
  • Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Moving a filter clause edit

My 1094 filter is primarily intended for LTAs, but some recent additions has it picking up lots of primary-school vandalism related to Skibidi Toilet (e.g. [1]). It seems like it would be more appropriate to merge those clauses to an existing filter that targest that type of disruption. Do you know of an existing filter that would be a good candidate for that and is monitored by a bot for WP:AIV autopostings? OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

(talk page watcher) Probably 614 (hist · log)? 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 14:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Perfect, thank you 0xDeadbeef! OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
No problem. Just noting: the list of filters monitored by the bot is configured at Template:DatBot filters. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 14:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

LTA edit

Since you've seemed to have related experience, Wikipedia:Edit_filter_noticeboard#Adding_potential_LTA_filter. Q T C 20:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@OverlordQ: Sorry for the late reply. I see you've removed the thread and don't have email enabled. There's not much to say in public, except that filters don't work terribly well against that sort of LTA. Email me if you want to discuss more. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Filter highlighter problem, and a question edit

Your filter highlighter script shows that a disabled filter, whether public or private, is enabled even though it's not, and it's missing the line across the filter's name for disabled filters.

Question: do I place window.effpUseDev = true; above or below importScript('User:Suffusion of Yellow/effp-helper.js');? That's because I want to enable experimental features for effp-helper.

Thanks, Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 23:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Um, which filter? Results are cached for up to 30 minutes; otherwise there would be a extra ~150K API request with every page load. I just disabled a few filters; is it one of those? Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I meant that the filter highlighter script displays that any disabled filter is enabled without the line crossing out the filter's name indicating that filter is disabled, even though those disabled filters are actually disabled. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 00:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Does it at least say "disabled" in the title text? Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
When I hover over a random public filter, say for example Special:AbuseFilter/1, it is actually disabled, and the information says that it is disabled. However, I do not see any line crossing out the filter's public description name indicating that it is visually disabled. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 00:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
But you see it on the the documentation page, I take it? That's weird; that should be the same CSS. I'll look at this more later, but try other browsers, zoom in, zoom out, etc. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 01:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, in Firefox when I choose "always underline links" the strikeout doesn't show for me either. Maybe you have some similar setting? I don't know if that's possible to override, but I'll look at it. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh and the order doesn't matter; everything in common.js will be executed before any of the imported scripts. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Magic edit

  The Magician's Barnstar
Looking at Special:AbuseFilter/1297, I think you could convert ClueBot NG into edit filter code and people wouldn't notice for a while. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, ToBeFree! I do hope to able to set that to disallow, but edits like Special:Diff/1218192315 are going to be tricky. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
That diff isn't vandalism? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
You would think so. But search YouTube for a video called 'QT Hush - "The Peeky-Boo Caper" (1960)'. (I won't link to it since it's probably a copyvio). When the title card comes up at about 00:25, it clearly says "The Peeky-Poo Caper". I suspect very few people care about this subject. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Interesting. Weird. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
(talk page watcher) Speaking of filters, 1297 caught Special:Diff/1219231893 of an IP posting "your mom" vandalism of which I just reverted; that filter tagged it, while 320 (hist · log) did not catch it at all. 1297 could possibly detect any false negatives other filters may not catch, and that diff technically counts as a false negative of filter 320.
Anyway, if filter 1297 tracks a huge number of vandalism that filters 12, 225, 260, 380, 384, and 614 may not catch if at all, then 1297 would also be justifiable in my opinion. Codename Noreste 🤔 𝙇𝙖 𝙎𝙪𝙢𝙖 14:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

phab:T363020 edit

done, can follow up at T363020 of course. — xaosflux Talk 20:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll leave the IP the vague note. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

This edit caught my eye... edit

Thought you might find it of interest. At Sneedville, Tennessee *previously known as Chvcksville* was added...using a V instead of a U...so very clever. Shearonink (talk) 00:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, I'm sure they feel clever, at least. I don't think this is a major problem anymore; best just to treat it as a WP:RBI matter when they slip past the filter. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

would this be okay? edit

can I send them my username on Fortnite? Ill delete it after, and well talk on fortnite EdenBAnn (talk) 22:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do not share any personal information that be tracked to your real-life identity. It's not likely in your case, but Wikipedia users have been known to get death threats. "Deleting it after" won't help; everything you say on Wikipedia is recorded in the page history. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay Thank You! EdenBAnn (talk) 22:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

A cupcake for you! edit

  Hi, sorry about all the mess on my friend's talk page. We will figure it out, how to talk to each other on a different website. So here is a cupcake as an apology. Quirkykiana (talk) 22:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! You weren't causing any major harm, but if that had gone on for thousands of edits, someone would have eventually taken harsher action. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C edit

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply