User talk:Scarce/Archive 6
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Nehrams2020 in topic WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call
- Early September 2009: Scarce
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
.jpeg){kind=small} | Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers. |
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
| Beware! This user is a known talk page stalker. |
'If you are seeking to leave me a message, You're in the wrong place! Click here to leave me a New Message'
DO NOT EDIT THE CONTENTS OF THIS PAGE!
- DO NOT LEAVE NEW MESSAGES HERE!
Early September 2009's Discussions
WP:FILMS August Newsletter
The WikiProject Films Newsletter
--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Scarce, Abutorsam007 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
WP:FILM September Election Voting
The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello!
Just popping in to say hi. I'm back on Wikipedia in some capacity, got over the nastiness for a while I guess. When'd you change your name? :) Lychosis T/C 11:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
My edits
Hello. About your message Shakira discography: Thanks for your advice, but really, my version separately are because I'm always reviewing what is best for the article and changing its contents to improve it, meanwhile I review others articles. So that's why I do separate editions. Thank you. --Dan6hell66 (talk) 18:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009
- From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
- News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: Digiclock
Thank you very much. Actually it's not that great: the code is inelegant and requires lots of repeats of expressions like: "(24+{{#time:G}}+{{{offset|0}}})" because the MediaWiki variables extension isn't enabled on Wikimedia servers. And even for all that, it doesn't support fractional timezones. I thought about perhaps splitting it into two templates, so the second would be called like a function, but it's also nice having its source kept in just one page. (Any thoughts?) Thanks for the praise anyway. • Anakin (talk) 11:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Re:Red links
Thanks for letting me know about the possibile notability problem! The notablity guide for actors says an actor is notable if he has multiple significant roles. Nick Lashaway, the name I redlinked, has had been cast in notable roles in 25/8, Little Murder, and The Last Song, as well as 7 other more minor productions. Isn't this enough? I know his role in The Last Song is very important.
Thanks again! Liquidluck (talk) 23:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks- I'll wait until one of these films is released. He's a main character and the primary antagonist in The Last Song, so with that and 25/8 an article should be fine once release dates approach and more press comes out. Liquidluck (talk) 00:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Hidden Page
You found my hidden page! Congratulations! Copy this code to put the barnstar on your userpage:{{User:BIONICLE233/Barnstar}}
It will look like this:User:BIONICLE233/Barnstar
Hello Scarce! I am glad you had fun finding my page, but unfortunately, its being threatened to be deleted. Help me fight for my page here, if you want to. But if you have your own hidden page, I recommend you "lay low" and do not post anything on the linked page. Thank you. BIONICLE233 17:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: The same wavelength
Haha, what a coincidence! I didn't even realize there had been a conflict. Also, I just noticed the shout-out you gave me here. Thank you very much for the kind review, I really appreciate it! :D Andrea (talk) 05:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Oh my god, this article needs so much work. I don't even know where to start. Let's make it not suck, though. Any good ideas? Audiosmurf ♪/♫ 09:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think the article could take a page from The Colbert Report, with regards to the Segments section. That is to say, I don't really think it needs one. The recurring jokes really does need to be reworked, or (preferably, IMO) stripped down and written into another section. I'm just not sure it requires its own section, yeah? Also, you made your signature pretty slick. :0 Audiosmurf ♪/♫ 10:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Honestly, I've never watched the show so I don't really know what the primary segments are, do you know? The whole "Joos" paragraph in the jokes section I think can be scrapped entirely. Same with the former segments. Do you think so? Also, ha, I was actually in the process of creating this when you sent that last note. :P Audiosmurf ♪/♫ 10:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- It's good, huh? I'd take a look if we got Fox News up here without fancy cable, but maybe I'll stream an episode or two. We gotta figure out a less clumsy way to word this, though:
- Gutfeld will also make frequent and graphic sexual insinuations regarding Bill Schultz, stating or insinuating that Schultz is a "pansexual dilettante", involved in various bizarre fetishes, is a virgin, is African-American or is a homosexual, among similar claims.
- It just kind reads really awkwardly. I tried to fix it up a bit earlier, but it needs to be totally reworded I think. Good work with the segments, too. I think a bit about the "Pinch" character is worth keeping in, but I don't think it requires its own subsection. A mention somewhere, possibly in the same area that the "Pinch & Me" segment is worked into, would probably suffice, wouldn't you say? Audiosmurf ♪/♫ 10:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- It's good, huh? I'd take a look if we got Fox News up here without fancy cable, but maybe I'll stream an episode or two. We gotta figure out a less clumsy way to word this, though:
- Honestly, I've never watched the show so I don't really know what the primary segments are, do you know? The whole "Joos" paragraph in the jokes section I think can be scrapped entirely. Same with the former segments. Do you think so? Also, ha, I was actually in the process of creating this when you sent that last note. :P Audiosmurf ♪/♫ 10:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009
- Opinion essay: White Barbarian
- Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
- Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
- News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Re 25/8
Playing a bully in at least 2 of his major roles? I think I sense some typecasting XD. Thanks, I'll definitely contribute if I find anything! Liquidluck (talk) 04:57, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS September Newsletter
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opening this weekend (10/2): Opening next weekend (10/9): Other October releases:
If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Films. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 10 – October 2009). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We couldn't do it without you! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009
- New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
- Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
- News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
How come you removed the discography off Kerli?
What the heck? What do you mean we don't need it no more? Who said that and why? I'm gonna try to fix this article soon cause right now it looks like crap. And the original picture that you cropped was fine the way it was before. Who cares if you see a little girl in the background cause its obvious who Kerli is. Go look at Adam Lambert's or Lady Gaga's article or other musicians articles. Now go look at Kerli's. Hers looks jacked up. --Homezfoo (talk) 08:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009
- From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
- Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
- Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
- News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
- Dispatches: Sounds
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I didn't feel comfortable deleting this article under G7 given that it had survived AFD with a keep from a third party. I would suggest that if you nominate it for prod or AFD you would be pretty certain of getting rid of it. Christopher Parham (talk) 21:02, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:37, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, just dropping by. How's it going?Abce2|This isnot a test 01:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I've been working on Wikias too some. What Wikias did you work on, if I may ask?Abce2|This isnot a test 01:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: New Moon
How do you feel about this one? Though I'm having trouble finding an original source for the image that doesn't have "Jacob" written behind him. Andrea (talk) 16:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Would you prefer this image of Jacob? We could crop off the bottom, where the logo is. Also, as far as I know there has never been a full group picture of the Twilight cast (too many characters!). There are, however, images of many of the individual groups (the Cullens, the wolf pack, the Volturi). Andrea (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Blair Waldorf
Hi. If you have an issue with the tone of the article, could you please specify your concerns on the Talk Page, instead of repeatedly tagging it? Having contributed significantly to that article, it irks me to see a tag at the top with little explanation as to why, and I'd appreciate that you clarify any specific problems you see so that we can go about remedying them. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 18:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wanted to say that I noticed some of the issues you seem to have had in one section (for the TV series), and I've attempted to deal with them. If these matters pop up again, can you consider tagging sections instead of the entire article? I believe that a tone tag for the whole thing is somewhat inaccurate, given that these matters don't exist everywhere, and some effort has indeed gone into the article. Of course, let me know if you disagree. -- James26 (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
- Interview: Interview with John Blossom
- News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
- In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
deletion of images
To Scarce:
I have been following all of your "instructions" to the fullest extent. You accuse me of mindlessly deleting the tags; however, perhaps you should have clarified your reason for deleting my images earlier. Moreover, you requested that I add a link to my file on the Volturi and to also procure a reduced version of it. I have followed it most completely. This is a valid link. Please provide more "evidence" before you revert my contributions to Wikipedia, or I will be compelled to take further action in response.
Universityoffelicity
P.S. I would appreciate it if you would be more specific as to why you think my image does not fulfill all the copyright standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Universityoffelicity (talk • contribs) 02:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
25/8
I don't see significant coverage for that film on it's production, which is the requirement for WP:NFF. I see, it started production and ended production. That's it. It wouldn't survive the NFF test. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 15:24, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- Don't get snippy with me. I'm merely telling you what NFF says, and currently that article fails NFF. As for "in the coming weeks", we've basically had the same information for months, with the only new update being that he changed the name of the film. I'd hardly consider that "significant coverage". BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- I follow the policies and guidelines we have. I'm sorry if you do not like that that is how I operate, or if you just do not agree with them. I have not come to that article and redirected it, started a deletion discussion or tried to merge it. Have I? Now, unless you have something to say to me in a more civil tongue, please do not return to my talk page and continue attacking me as you have been doing as of late. Good day. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 20:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
- Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup
- Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia
- Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report
- Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway
- Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Pictures
Why are all the WOWP main characters pictures have been removed? I believe they DO qualify as free use! --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 01:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Does this picture qualify as "free use" (http://images.fanpop.com/images/image_uploads/alex-wizards-of-waverly-place-479556_300_399.jpg)? And this is the article I was talking about: List of Wizards of Waverly Place characters
- And I've attempted to split off one article Alex Russo from the above page. Can you help me "clean up" the split? And we seriously need pictures for WOWP main characters! --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 02:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- How about this picture? http://tv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/global/wallpaper.html?img=http://atv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/media/wizardsofwaverlyplace/downloads/wallpaper_alex_800x600.jpg&bg=17224A
More can be found at: http://tv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/wizardsofwaverlyplace/downloads/index.html
--Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 02:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
File uploaded: Image:AlexRusso.jpg. Please upload the other main characters. Good night. I'm going to bed now. File:Grin.gif. --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 02:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS October Newsletter
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opening last weekend (10/30):
Opened this weekend (11/6): Opening next weekend (11/13):
Other November releases:
If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Films. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 11 – November 2009). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We couldn't do it without you! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<noinlcude></noinclude> --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
- New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol
- German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists
- Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris
- Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November
- News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more
- In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more
- Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)