Talk:Hollywood Boulevard Commercial and Entertainment District

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hollywood Boulevard Commercial and Entertainment District/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gb321 (talk · contribs) 04:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: ForksForks (talk · contribs) 15:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

I am going to fail this article because it fails the third criteria of the WP:GAFAIL criteria: a maintenance tag that is unquestionably still valid. This has to do with the unencyclopedic quantity of images in the article. No prejudice from me against renominating once these are fixed.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Re-nominating for Good Article

feedback from previous nomination was addressed (not sure why I wasn't given any time to address the feedback before the previous nomination was failed, the feedback was not difficult to address)

hope the re-nomination works Gb321 (talk) 20:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hollywood Boulevard Commercial and Entertainment District/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gb321 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: NoobThreePointOh (talk · contribs) 20:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

I'll review this and add comments in a while. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I'm quickfailing this article for these reasons:

• The tag on the top has not been removed, as mentioned by the reviewer in the previous GA review and per the third criteria in WP:GAFAIL.
• There are still too many images which can distract the reader from the article.
• Some of the images, like the 1902/03 and the 1905 images are also not placed in the correct sections, which results in certain paragraphs being considerably quite squashed together and unreadable.

Please feel free to renominate once the article seems like it meets GA criteria. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Re-nominating for Good Article Again

Re-nominating again. Is this really the best way to do this? To have the article rejected then have to re-nominate after changes are made? Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations/Instructions#Step_4:_What_to_do_during_a_review says "You are expected to respond to the reviewer's suggestions to improve the article to GA quality in a timely manner," which seems to imply there is another process that is supposed to be happening, rather than immediate fails for items that aren't too difficult to fix.