Neverrainy

Hello, Neverrainy, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 23:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

August 2012

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give James Bond 007 (1997 video game) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 18:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give The World Is Not Enough (video game) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you.

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give 007: Quantum of Solace (video game) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:14, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 9th British Academy Video Games Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Wallace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Escapist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220 of ^Borg 11:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Password (UK game show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Was It Something I Said? (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Stella (UK TV series) episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Edwards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Morecambe & Wise Show episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Lead sections

Hi Neverrainy,

Lead sections summarize its articles. So on The Order: 1886, having a separate paragraph in the lead that mentions how the game was received is very much appropriate and necessary for the article. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 09:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dishonored (series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dishonored (series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dishonored (series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The1337gamer (talk) 16:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Homefront (series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Homefront (series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homefront (series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move of article The Morecambe & Wise Show (1968–1977)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give The Morecambe & Wise Show (1968–1977) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into The Morecambe & Wise Show. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title (*)), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ubcule (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

(*) My emphasis, since that appears to be the case here; I note that you've used the "Move" function elsewhere- implying that you know how to use it- but because a disambiguation page entitled The Morecambe & Wise Show already existed I assume you weren't able to do it in this case. Ubcule (talk) 20:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Additional; I posted the above because your "merge" of the BBC and ITV shows *was* essentially just a move of the BBC article (that's okay, since there wasn't a standalone article for the ITV show anyway). However, I'd also note that when you pasted the content you didn't make the source article clear either. It's not at all obvious from reading the edit summary alone that you're not the actual author of this material).

All the best, Ubcule (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Attribution of merged content from other articles (List of The Morecambe & Wise Show (1978–1983) episodes)

Hi again,

When merging content from several articles, please make clear in the edit summary that this is what you're doing.

In this edit, you merge the content of the List of The Morecambe & Wise Show (1978–1983) episodes article, but the source isn't mentioned, so it isn't entirely obvious (upon first glance) that you're not the author.

In this case a note such as

Merged content from List of The Morecambe & Wise Show (1978–1983) episodes; I am not the author of this content, please see that article's history for contributors

or something along those lines would do the job.

All the best, Ubcule (talk) 20:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move of Forza Motorsport (video game)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Forza Motorsport (video game) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Forza Motorsport. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 22:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi ... can you tell me where this mass move was discussed and agreed to by the community? Large-scale moves of this calibre usually go through a move request procedure. Thanks. --McDoobAU93 22:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Erika Harlacher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erika Harlacher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Harlacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 18:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

MOS:TIME

Our manual of style contains specific guidance on the presentation of times in Wikipedia articles. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Brianna Knickerbocker moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Brianna Knickerbocker, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. czar 18:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Brianna Knickerbocker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brianna Knickerbocker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Knickerbocker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 21:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

The X Factor ratings for series 13

Hi, your edit summaries seem to imply that I have given no reason for removing the ratings from the table, but I have done so every time. We are using 28-day ratings this year as they are available from BARB and are a more true figure as to who is watching the show. For example, I watched bootcamp on the ITV Hub 11 days after it was broadcast, so my viewing would be reported in the 28-day figure but not the 7-day figure. So can you please not add any ratings until the 28-day data becomes available. Thanks :-) anemoneprojectors 11:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring, thanks. This should not be changed. Please discuss on the article's talk page instead. However, your reasoning that ITV+1 is a different timeslot does not matter, as ITV Hub can be watched at any time, not in the original time slot, and if the figure wasn't a true rating, BARB would not provide it. So please stop, or you could end up blocked from editing. Thanks. anemoneprojectors 14:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

BioShock RM

Hi Neverrainy, I brought your request to full RM, just an FYI. — Andy W. (talk) 04:57, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry investigation notification

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Neverrainy. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

VG Awards Tables

I would strongly caution about automatically adding awards tables to VG articles. If there are already existing awards tables, it makes sense to group awards, but this is a preference of whether to use one or not (and we have no VG guidelines to require them). There's a few recent tables that you've added for one or two awards, which is better summarized in prose. A dozen-some awards, on the other hand, likely would be best as a table but still would be good to check. --MASEM (t) 03:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

WP:CITEVAR and Template:Video game reviews

Read them. I already explain this to you before. I'm amazed that you continue to ignore them. --The1337gamer (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Neverrainy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm NOTNOTABLE. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 3-2-1 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NOTNOTABLE (talk) 20:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Misrepresenting participants in discussions warning

Aside from the current accusations about you in a current case at SPI, I see at the TimeSplitters move discussion, you were twice caught trying to stack votes in favor of your own proposal, despite warnings not to do so. This is entirely unacceptable. If there are any more scenarios involving you logging out and editing anonymously in order to manipulate discussions and scenarios like this, your account is going be blocked from editing for a bit. There's no excuse for games like that. Sergecross73 msg me 19:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:TimeSplitters (series) while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. You have been told about this previously and so consider this a final warning. You must not intentionally logout to edit as an IP address instead of with your account, as that constitutes an attempt to mislead and a violation of policy. If you continue doing this after this warning, your account (and potentially the range of IP addresses you are using) will be blocked. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 20:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Self-redirect

Hi Neverrainy. I noticed that you created Street Fighter Collection 2 as a redirect to itself. I assume this was a mistake, so I'm letting you know so that you can edit it to redirect wherever it was supposed to go. Thanks! —Granger (talk · contribs) 12:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Just letting you know, that this was NOT a mistake I made. It was a legit edit that was supposed to be made. Street Fighter Collection 2 is part of Capcom Generations in Japan and since Japan it is the originator of releasing the collection, it goes where it needs to be. Hope this clears up Neverrainy (talk) 22:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Thel33tgamer fixed it after Mx. Granger noticed it. -- ferret (talk) 22:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

@The1337gamer: Thanks! —Granger (talk · contribs) 22:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm The1337gamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, State of Decay 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 18:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at State of Decay 2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 19:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Um, why? It's missing other genres. Neverrainy (talk) 19:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your adding unsourced information and removing sourced information. Stop doing that. Thanks. --The1337gamer (talk) 19:04, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Feels really empty. Reverted your edit. Neverrainy (talk) 19:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to State of Decay 2. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The1337gamer (talk) 19:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop removing sourced content, as you did to Ballerina (2016 film). -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Vgrelease parameters

In this edit, you added Vgrelease template, which is perfectly fine. You used NA= and EU= for the parameters. Please be aware this syntax is being depreciated soon. The syntax is now NA| and EU|, like the Vgrelease new template. They have been merged following a TfD. -- ferret (talk) 15:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion opened

Please see Talk:Destroy All Humans! (series)#Requested move 13 January 2017. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the EA Access page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Misused guideline

In your edits to Grabbed by the Ghoulies ([1][2]), you removed the Japanese release date from the article's body and you linked to a WP:VG/RELEASE guideline for such removal. However, it seems you have misused that guideline you've pointed out to because WP:VG/RELEASE actually says: "Releases in non-English countries should otherwise not be included in the infobox, but if determined to be necessary to include, can be discussed further in the article's body." That is, the Japanese release dates should not be included in the infobox, but it should be included in the article's body. Thanks. – Hounder4 13:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Unsourced release dates

Please do not add unsourced release dates to upcoming films, as you did in this edit. If you're getting your information from the IMDb, please be aware that this is not a reliable source, as it's user-generated. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for the advice on my talk page. I just made an edit to the article Fist Fight using the referencing template that you suggested and with a more detailed edit summary.The Editor 155 (talk) 20:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to SOCOM

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from SOCOM without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dan Koehl (talk) 11:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

The Operative: No One Lives Forever date changes

Hey, I noted that you changed several release dates in the infobox at the The Operative: No One Lives Forever article (November 9, 2000 → November 11, 2000, April 18, 2002 → April 16, 2002, and November 21, 2002 → November 11, 2002). Could you provide reliable sources for these claims, please? Cheers! Lordtobi (✉) 13:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Styx: Shards of Darkness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Destruction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Yooka-Laylee

Why did you change the review table that separated the consoles to their individual reviews? GamerPro64 17:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

That's how many other recent video game articles do their reception sections. See For Honor, Mass Effect: Andromeda, Resident Evil 7: Biohazard, Styx: Shards of Darkness, Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands and Torment: Tides of Numenera. Neverrainy (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

There's no standard to do that. It happened with Mighty No. 9's article. Just think a multiplatformed game should be spaced out more. GamerPro64 17:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

If that happens, it's just going to squash the words on the synopsis from the Reception section. Neverrainy (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Template:Headhunter series

You may be right that Template:Headhunter series ought to be deleted -- I don't have an opinion about that now. But if you want it to be deleted, you would need to take it to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion because it is a template, not an article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I made a mistake on that as I couldn't find the deletion for templates article. Neverrainy (talk) 02:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

In fact, I just got this wrong too. The actual page you should go to is Wikipedia:Templates for discussion, not Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Sorry about that. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Eurovision Song Contest 2014, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. A consensus decision was reached and resulted in the presentation style of the split result tables. Your changes are deviating away from the decision which was agreed upon. Wes Wolf ^Talk 23:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Eurovision Song Contest 2013. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Wes Wolf ^Talk 23:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

• The fact that you have alter the style on the 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 articles - all of which have been reverted, should be an indication to cease making further similar removal edits. I would strongly recommend taking notice of these warnings. Thank you. Wes Wolf ^Talk 23:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2012, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Wes Wolf ^Talk 23:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2011. Seriously, you need to stop. You are now close to being blocked. Wes Wolf ^Talk 23:44, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2010, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wes Wolf ^Talk 23:57, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

One Piece

What are you doing? you're just moving stuff around the page back and forth. Nuobgu (talk) 21:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Hey, it's not my fault that the season 18 episodes are in the season 19 episodes now is it? Neverrainy (talk) 00:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm following the pattern the dvds do it. Whole Cake Island arc is a new season just like the past arcs were. Nuobgu (talk) 01:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I've fixed it for you. You should thank me. Neverrainy (talk) 01:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I cleaned it up afterwards. Nuobgu (talk) 03:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Adam West

You have just admonished me for "disruptive editing" of Adam West, yet I'm unclear about why my edits constitute disruptive editing. Adam West has just passed away, warranting the update. Tmnh07 (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

You added unsourced content from his death and you have no sources to back up your argument. Neverrainy (talk) 15:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

I'm fairly certain that widely circulated information does not require sourcing. Take the Wikipedia pages for numerous actors – James Dean, Burt Lancaster, Humphrey Bogart, Robin Williams to name of few – none of them include sourcing for dates of birth and death. Furthermore, your original message was misleading – there's a distinction between vandalism and sourcing issues. I never attempted to "blank out or remove portions" of the page.Tmnh07 (talk) 16:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) But, years from now, this will not be widely circulated. We require sources for everything. See WP:RS (and WP:BLPRS for articles on living or recently deceased people) for what types of sources are allowed. — Gestrid (talk) 21:52, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

It's cited later in the article too, for the record. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Manual of style violations

This revision violates the manual of style, and has been undone. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop changing the time formats on the E3 article. That is not the correct style. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

• This article was specifically tagged so passersby wouldn't do exactly what you did. Based on the above warnings, I would hope that you will be more conscientious about making systematic changes (as you did with the infobox as well) if it's likely that they were set up that way for a reason. czar 06:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

You do realise that it is a European game made in France right? Hence why we have a different dd/mm/yyyy format to the US one that you people have. Neverrainy (talk) 20:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Current WPVG consensus is that the developer's nationality does not constitute a strong national tie. -- ferret (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Furthermore, the article is tagged with "mdy". Even if you felt strongly, you're looking at starting a talk page discussion rather than steamrolling through once again. That's edit warring, and you've already been warned to desist.  czar 20:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello, I'm Digifan23. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gladiators (1992 UK TV series) Series Two without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Digifan23 (talk) 07:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

You have no reliable sources. Neverrainy (talk) 11:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

My Life as a Courgette

Please see the talkpage of this article. A requested move ended earlier today showing that it should remain at My Life as a Courgette. Please use the WP:RM process if you wish to move an article in the future, if it's possible it could be challenged. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Everybody's Golf

Why did you move the page to its Japanese title? It's known as simply Everybody's Golf in English markets, and therefore is the WP:COMMONNAME. I moved it back, and unless you can give a good, policy-backed reason for it, it should stay that way. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 23:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Look at their other games. Their articles have the original Japanese titles labelled. Why can't this one? Neverrainy (talk) 23:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

What does that matter for this specific name? Are reviews and other reliable English sources calling it by the Japanese name? If not, then we shouldn't either. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 00:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

So, you give the other articles a free pass with the Japanese titles (even though they were released in other countries under a different title) but not this one? I'm confused. Neverrainy (talk) 00:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Price Is Right (UK game show), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please stop removing content and replacing it with "???". AldezD (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Can I ask if you have any sources to back it up? If not, then do NOT revert because of "unexplained reasons" for no reason. Neverrainy (talk) 19:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

If you want to remove unsourced content--remove it. But do not add a "???" placeholder. AldezD (talk) 19:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

You're recent edit to The Apprentice (UK TV series) has been reverted, for adding in excessive details than is needed. If such information is wanted, you would also have to detail out re-runs with it as well. The overview should just focus on certain details, and not this. GUtt01 (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

That makes no sense whatsoever. Since when did I add re-runs? Why does The Great British Bake Off get away with "timeslot" and "channel"? Please explain, I'm confused. Neverrainy (talk) 21:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

We don't need to discuss "Timeslot" and "Channel" in that table; there are mentions of this elsewhere in other parts of the article, and those are sufficient. The Great British Bake Off should not really be including that information in a table, but rather as written text in the article; it already does so in the Lead and within a sub-section of Series Overview, so I'll deal with that soon enough. GUtt01 (talk) 22:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Ah, OK. Thanks for the explanation. Neverrainy (talk) 22:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Gran Turismo Sport

Your recent editing history at Gran Turismo Sport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Niche-gamer 14:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Neverrainy, if you continue to do edits like this that remove prose from clearly reliable sources, I'm going to issue a block. You've got a long history of editing problems and the recent edit warring with the IP on car-related video games is something you don't need warned about. -- ferret (talk) 14:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Neverrainy, your name has been mentioned at User talk:EdJohnston#Project CARS 2. You can respond there if you wish. If it turns out that you and the IP are clashing at multiple articles, you'll need to start using WP:Dispute resolution. When there is so much reverting and so little talking, that's a sign that admins should be considering blocks. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Burnout 3: Takedown, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 18:19, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Gran Turismo Sport

Hey, I couldn't discuss this issue earlier, just because I have a large ammount of things to juggle on Wikipedia, but back in October I made some edits to the Gran Turismo Sport page which you reverted. The issues I have was that the article went into unnecessary detail about the demo contrary to what usually is the case, and now that the game's out it really does not serve a purpose to describe what's in it. I also seperated "development and release" to two seperate sections as is the norm, and I'm realy unclear as to why you changed that back. Can you explain? --Deathawk (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Wrong user. User talk:Soetermans is the one you should talk to. Neverrainy (talk) 23:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Ok, sorry. --Deathawk (talk) 23:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Ok so I just talked to him, and he doesn't know anything about it. Looking through the edit history, this was the change that reverted it, and you're the editor who made that edit. --Deathawk (talk) 08:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Not sure why you would confuse your own edits with that of another editor, but okay. Speaking of Gran Turismo Sport, Neverrainy, why did you take out clearly reliable sources like Metro and Hobby Consolas, while adding an unsourced claims about fans' disappointment with the game? Please don't do that anymore. You're an experienced editor, I shouldn't have to tell you this. Another question, can you please use an edit summary? It's common courtesy and you can explain your reasoning for your edits. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Where are you going with this? Why are you changing the subject? Why are you even talking to me anyway? What does this have to do with anything? Neverrainy (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

You're not editing constructively, because you don't follow basic rules on editing. You're taking out sourced content and you're adding unsourced, opinionated stuff. Deathawk asked you why you undid their edits, and for some reason, you're saying I did it. That's odd behavior, Neverrainy. Please don't do that anymore, and change your attitude accordingly. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 16:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Since when did I add in unsourced content? Why are you spreading rumours about me? Why would you assume that I add in opinionated stuff? Have you ever looked past my entire edit history? Neverrainy (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

You did, right here and then. You added "Unofficially, fans have been vocal across all social media platforms on the let down of the game. Many of the complaints include lack of career mode, low selection of vehicles, and online dependency. They have also stated they are confused by the inclusion of historical content and other nonessential items. Fans have stated they would rather have had the personnel and time that was committed to these features devote their time to missing features from previous Gran Turismo games." You do know how diffs work right? I'm not spreading a rumour, I'm talking to you directly on your talk page. And I'm not talking about your edit history, I'm talking about one article. You don't have to reply, just stop your unconstructive editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:33, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Hang on! I'm looking at the grammar of that sentence that you have given to me and I know for a FACT that I did NOT add the sentence in there. My grammar is a lot more different and I use a different use of the English language. Look at the edit history again. Neverrainy (talk) 01:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

What are you talking about? You use a different use of English? What has that got to with the diff I've linked to two times already? I haven't given you a warning, you're not in trouble, so why are you denying that you added that? You're being very difficult here, Neverrainy. Could you please try and be more communicative? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 03:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

I think what Neverrainy is trying to say is that (while clearly it's his diff), he didn't write it. I think we can chalk it up as an accidental restoration of someone else's text or an edit conflict. That said I agree with the general discussion here for more edit notes and less edit warring over clearly reliable sources in reception sections. -- ferret (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you ferret for clearing it up. Neverrainy (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Soundtrack removals

Hi Neverrainy! I noticed that on November 22 you removed several soundtrack sections from video game articles. The edit summaries all said "WP:VGSCOPE. No track listings." The article guidelines for WikiProject Video games do not categorically prohibit soundtrack sections and some sections had track lists, while others did not, so it unclear what you meant by "No track listings." For now, I've gone ahead and reinstated some of those sections. I suggest you look over item #15, "Non-notable soundtracks" under WP:VGSCOPE and review the articles again. Best, – Zntrip 18:17, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Neverrainy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19990 was submitted on Dec 08, 2017 05:50:00. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I apparently blocked you by mistake tonight when we suffered a 4chan attack on gaming related articles and attempted to shut down IPs and redlinked users editing gaming related articles at high volume. Since you were editing the gaming awards page at that time, your account ended up in my filter. If you would like to get an idea of the magnitude of what some of us were dealing with, I invite you to take a look at this revision history page. So I'm sorry that you were affected by my imperfect action. If any queries come up regarding the block, please refer to this message. If you need to find out how to obtain a permanent link, let me know. Regards, Samsara 06:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks dude! The reason I reverted it to a redirect is because of those attacks. I am not a part of 4chan in any way. Thanks for unblocking me dude! Neverrainy (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eurovision Song Contest, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 08:21, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Similarly to the concern from @Valenciano: I have just reverted this diff. I don't think it is okay to blank a small article with a decade's history simply because a video game exists named after the Middle Ages ecclesiastical officer. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

And a Happy New Year!

Hello Neverrainy: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:23, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neversoft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N-Gage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Through the Keyhole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caprice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Creating Unfrefrenced Articles

Hi! I noticed through new page patrol that you created a variety of articles for the Army Men series of games. I have reverted these to redirects because they all had no references or citations. The series is clearly notable and it wouldn't surprise me if many or all of the entires you made were also notable. However, with-out references to reliable sources it can be hard to tell. If you decide to still work on these articles, please make sure you add citations to reliable sources to help show their notability. Ping me here or leave me a message on my talk if I can answer any questions. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Bullseye (UK game show). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop adding unsourced content. AldezD (talk) 11:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 01:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

If you evade your block again, I will increase the block duration. -- ferret (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Taskmaster episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Taskmaster episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Taskmaster episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matt14451 (talk) 10:56, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Neverrainy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Recent edits to List of Xbox games compatible with Xbox 360

Hi I saw a lot of recent big changes you made to List of Xbox games compatible with Xbox 360 please discuss these changes here before reverting. Thank you. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 02:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Test Drive

Thanks for helping out with re-doing the Test Drive Series pages and other related pages, but there are a few things which I needed to change for you:

Atari isn’t the publisher for V-Rally 3 (apart from the PC version) or TD Overdrive. Infogrames is still the publisher, they just used the Atari name as a brand label at the time before they properly renamed themselves.

As for TD Overdrive, I had to change it back to that name as the game was developed in the UK and that is what the name is there.

Still, good job dispite some misinformation. Luigitehplumber (talk) 20:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the compliments and the criticism. But your reason on changing the title in TD Overdrive has been brought forward to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Test Drive games with change of titles. Neverrainy (talk) 01:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (V-Rally) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating V-Rally.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thank you for creating the page with multiple reliable, independent sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 17:39, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Notice.

Hello. I have seen by a pure chance you merged MX vs. ATV: On the Edge into MX vs. ATV Unleashed. While I understand the "PSP port" reasoning into this, it is a valid spinoff, in sense it has a completely different title, console wise it's not a direct port (handheld vs regular console), and was reviewed separately and treated separately by the reputable video game sites (6 linked WP:VG/RS references with links and more without). I understand merging things that have bare notability or none at all, but this seems fairly notable on it's own and should be treated as such (passes WP:GNG easily). So please, either seek a talk page consensus for merge, or nominate it to AfD. Thank you. I have also seen you did the same with ATV Offroad Fury Pro and ATV Offroad Fury: Blazin' Trails, both of which seem to be fairly notable games independent of the parent game. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Hitman HD Enhanced Collection moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hitman HD Enhanced Collection, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Terror Towers

Hello, Neverrainy,

Thanks for creating Terror Towers! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references and why this is notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Terror Towers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Terror Towers, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Sony Movies Classic does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. You made three unexplained edits in a row. One of them was just reverted by an IP, who explained why they were doing what they were doing--as far as I'm concerned, that's the proper way to do it. Drmies (talk) 17:55, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Hitman HD Enhanced Collection

Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Hitman HD Enhanced Collection.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Beat the Chef. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 03:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

MotoGP 2 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MotoGP 2, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 05:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Terror Towers concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Terror Towers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

About Draft:MotoGP 2

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:MotoGP 2 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 03:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Terror Towers

Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Terror Towers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Launchballer 23:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:MotoGP 2

Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MotoGP 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

That's My Dog moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, That's My Dog, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 06:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:That's My Dog

Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "That's My Dog".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Warning

Hello, Neverrainy. Regardless of the merits of the content dispute you were involved in, edits such as this and this are unacceptable. Communication is required as a matter of policy, and refusing to communicate constitutes disruptive editing. While nothing stops you from blanking sections of your talk page, you are not allowed to refuse to engage in communication when prompted. This is fairly serious—if a user is unable or unwilling to engage in routine communication, the only option eventually becomes to block them indefinitely. You seem to indicate on your talk page that you are open to this, so I hope you will work on this in good faith. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 23:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Music (video game) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Music (video game), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Eldon Avenue v. Clarendon Road

The reason I decided to use the title List of films and television shows shot at Clarendon Road Studios, Elstree was because Eldon Avenue didn't exist when the first studios opened on this site, whereas Clarendon Road has always existed. For what its worth, Google reckons that "Clarendon Road Studios" appears on about 119,000 website pages, whereas "Eldon Avenue Studios" appears on only 213 pages, many of which seem to be mirrors of Wikipedia pages. Clarendon Road is historically the most-used name.  Dr Greg  talk  13:04, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Elden Ring

I just noticed that you went and added redirects to piped links on Elden Ring's article. In case you aren't aware, they provide no benefit and are generally a waste of time per WP:NOTBROKEN and WP:NOPIPE. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 15:49, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Love Me, Love Me Not (British game show)

The article Love Me, Love Me Not (British game show) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Zero ProQuest results about a game show under this title in relation to either host.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Music (video game)

Hello, Neverrainy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Music (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Music (video game)

Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Music".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 21:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Music (video game)

Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Music".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:01, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Episode table date format

I reverted an edit of yours ([3]) and wanted to give you an explanation of why. In the Template:Episode table template, you cannot format AltDate with {{Start date}}. The reason is that {{Start date}} emits metadata as part of the parent template's hCalendar microformat. It is only needed once per episode, and may be harmful if used twice or more. Per the template documentation, MOS:DATE formats are what should be used (which is what was used in the page to begin with). Hope that makes sense. If you have any questions about it, just ping me. Thanks! ButlerBlog (talk) 12:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emergency with Angela Griffin

The article Emergency with Angela Griffin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2016

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on F1 23

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page F1 23, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Neverrainy reported by User:Happily888 (Result: ). Thank you. Happily888 (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Married at First Sight (British TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Married at First Sight.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Reverting IABot citation cleanup

I've now seen you revert, without explanation, IABOt citation edits twice. Please stop. This is very disruptive, and if need be, I'll just block you indefinite this time. You are more than aware you need to explain your reverts and edits, but there really is no valid explanation for reverting citation cleanup. -- ferret (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

I've reviewed all of these and two of them were fine, so I unreverted them. One required a single bad archive URL to be removed. The other I left reverted. Please explain your reverts Neverrainy. This isn't the first time we've had this issue. -- ferret (talk) 19:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Music Time Logo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Music Time Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Ирука¹³ 06:36, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Storytime Logo (1992-93).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Storytime Logo (1992-93).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Ирука¹³ 05:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Number Time Logo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Number Time Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Ирука¹³ 12:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Words and Pictures Logo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Words and Pictures Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Ирука¹³ 08:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Homefront series

Template:Homefront series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. QuietCicada - Talk 22:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Neverrainy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Can you explain why? I been added sources recently to transmission dates on Rip Off Britain (TV programme) to avoid unsourced content and this is what I get? Neverrainy (talk) 03:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

In this perplexing series of edits, you add unsourced platforms and remove a citation. I didn't notice that your last block was actually several years ago and that the edit that I linked above was to an article that I created. In light of these issues, I'll unblock you. I apologize for the harsh two-week block when you had gone unblocked for several years, but please don't remove citations while adding unsourced content. I can't really imagine a reason someone would do that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Gladiators (2024 Australian TV series), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Happily888 (talk) 00:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Gladiators (2024 British TV series, series 1), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Happily888 (talk) 01:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Gladiators (2024 British TV series, series 1)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gladiators (2024 British TV series, series 1). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gladiators (2024 British TV series). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gladiators (2024 British TV series). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Happily888 (talk) 01:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Alone (British TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alone (British TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 6) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 6). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 5) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 5). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 5) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 5) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 5) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 03:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Glow Up: Britain's Next Make-Up Star (series 4) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Glow Up: Britain's Next Make-Up Star (series 4), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Glow Up: Britain's Next Make-Up Star (series 4) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glow Up: Britain's Next Make-Up Star (series 4) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glow Up: Britain's Next Make-Up Star (series 4) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 22:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)