Your submission at Articles for creation: YouTube Rewind 2021 (November 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, NTDEV! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: YouTube New To You - Discover More Relate Sources To YouTube. (November 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please WP:NOTHOWTO.
S0091 (talk) 15:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm BusterD. An edit that you recently made to Help:IPA/English seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BusterD (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pizzagate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BusterD (talk) 19:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Anime Of Nissan Skyline R34.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Anime Of Nissan Skyline R34.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase requests edit

 

Please stop making frivolous requests at the RFPP noticeboard. Do not use the board unless you understand what it's for. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I can only repeat that; just learn a bit more about Wikipedia before making the requests. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Copyright infringement, you may be blocked from editing. Nardog (talk) 16:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Doit. SunDawntalk 14:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Pizzagate conspiracy theory has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Help:IPA/English. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Nardog (talk) 13:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your edits edit

Many, many, many of your edits have been reverted. What are you trying to accomplish here? Your edits to Wikipedia space are either trivial changes or not helpful. Your article edits are sparse. I suggest you stop and think about why you are here because building an encyclopedia does not look to be high on the priority list for you. -- Whpq (talk) 17:00, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to second this. I think I've reverted at least one of your edits every day the last week. Please stop trying to "fix" shortcuts; they are not broken. Primefac (talk) 08:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

WOULDN't you like edit

to untransclude WP:EDITWARRING? It's messing up the page. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:CASCADE (disambiguation) edit

  Wikipedia:CASCADE (disambiguation), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:CASCADE (disambiguation) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:CASCADE (disambiguation) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces (Wikipedia) for a period of 1 month for continuing to demonstrate that you do not understand the feedback you are being given, and are being disruptive.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Primefac (talk) 07:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NTDEV (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm Think This Content Violates 3RR Policy! Please Stop Disrupted Editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by NTDEV (talkcontribs) 07:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 16:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Windows 8 Build 7989 edit

  Hello, NTDEV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Windows 8 Build 7989, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:YouTube New To You - Discover More Relate Sources To YouTube. edit

  Hello, NTDEV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:YouTube New To You - Discover More Relate Sources To YouTube., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Windows 8 Build 7989 edit

 

Hello, NTDEV. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Windows 8 Build 7989".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply