User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 75
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 70 | ← | Archive 73 | Archive 74 | Archive 75 | Archive 76 | Archive 77 | → | Archive 80 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
TFA
Thank you today for Cerro Blanco (volcano), "about a volcanic caldera in remote northwestern Argentina. It is well known for three reasons; firstly, the wind-formed landscape at Campo de Piedra Pomez that has been used as an analogue terrain for Mars and is also a local tourism destination. Secondly, for its major eruption 4,200 years ago that distributed volcanic ash across the region. Third, because satellite images have seen that the caldera is actively deforming to this day."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:15, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Monty Hall problem on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
15:06, 30 January 2023 Jo-Jo Eumerus talk contribs deleted page Independent Institute for Social Policy (A7: Article about a club, society or group, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject
What is template to find sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metro2fsb (talk • contribs) 17:09, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
TFA
 |
Thank you today for Resolution Guyot, "about one of the three well-studied seamounts in the Mid-Pacific Mountains (the other two are Allison Guyot and Horizon Guyot), all of which were formerly volcanic islands before they first became carbonate platforms - similar to present-day atolls - and later sank below the sea surface for reasons not yet known after a brief period of emergence. There has been a fair amount of research with drill cores which allowed scientists to reconstruct how it may have appeared a hundred million years ago (and from Wikipedia's perspective, to allow some illustration of the long-gone landscapes based on present-day environments with similar traits)."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Message by Noël TCHALLAGASSOU (N D P) (talk) 19:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I am Noël from Togo. Help me please. I want to unlock one of my occount. His username is Noël DEPARIS - NDP. He is lock. Thank you. ---Noël TCHALLAGASSOU (N D P) (talk) 19:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Greetings, you need to reply to the points raised at User talk:Noël DEPARIS - NDP. And not make additional accounts, either. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 February 2023
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Walter Beer
Could you please email me on Wikipedia the contact for the deleted entry on Walter Beer? - Aboudaqn (talk) 22:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Would putting a copy in your user namespace work as well? I am reticent at sharing my email address. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Perfect, yes! Aboudaqn (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Perfect, yes! Aboudaqn (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Trappist-1
I noticed you are nominating Trappist-1 as a good article. I understand your eagerness, as you have contributed a lot to it. But there are quite a few changes and additions coming in the next 24 months about the system. If I were you I would wait until the current knowledge about the system is more complete and a little more stable. Comments? Dhrm77 (talk) 17:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think that on such topics the knowledge will never be complete, really ... unless it turns out that they are all atmosphereless rocks. And I actually think that we should have a good article ready in the case that there is a major discovery and folks come here to see what it is about. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
User:Larsro/sandbox
Just wanna clarify something. Isn't this a self-promo page that is deletable as U5? --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well, self-promotion is what G11 is about. Either way, though, that draft does read like a typical biography to me, if somewhat poorly written, but not like spam or promotion unless one considers any biography written by the subject as spam. And I don't think that speedy deletion policy makes that assumption. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Deletion review for Cookie's Bustle
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cookie's Bustle. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. NinCollin (talk) 07:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2023
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
Speedy deletion request of editnotices redirecting from wrong title
I had requested a speedy deletion of {{Editnotices/You should notify any user that you discuss}} and {{Editnotices/Notcensored (nudity)}} by criteria G6 with the Twinkle tool. These template redirects are left over from moving an editnotice that was obviously created at the name of wrong form, which is exactly what {{Db-error}} means. When the tool found the editnotice page is under protected, it automatically submitted this request on its talk page.
However, I found that you deleted Template talk:Editnotices/Notcensored (nudity) under criteria G7 while kept its subject page. It's a misunderstanding. I have proposed RFDs for these template redirects as well while got little response. Please consider my CSD requests. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 10:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- I've undeleted that page, but I think I'll bow out from assessing any more on this edit notice. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The file File:Monte Burney, 1871 publication.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Superseded by commons:File:Vereker Mount Burney from the Otter Isles Cunningham 1871 Notesonnaturalhi00cunn 0008.jpg; a redirect to that file is behind this one.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of TRAPPIST-1
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article TRAPPIST-1 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Robminchin -- Robminchin (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Reversion without basic investigation
I have noted your reversion of my presumably poorly worded update of Magellan Rise (ocean plateau) as you detected an apparent inconsistency with a reference when there is none. I have no real interest on the Magellan Rise (ocean plateau) as this is a correct name, but do have an interest in an inaccurate sentence in the article that you reverted, so again creating an inaccuracy. However I suspect you are interested in having Wikipedia accurate like I am and I personally do not enter editorial wars, which can happen with geographical names. In the revision you removed my reference to the Magellan Seamounts which is now the internationally agreed name for what was historically termed by some confusingly the Magellan Rise to the West of the Marshall Islands. Such is well known in the Russian literature that resulted from their past (and internationally collaborative) important and informative research studies in the area. Current marine feature names in English are usually in my personal practice checked against https://www.marineregions.org/gazetteer.php?p=search. In this area of the planet where most of the recent oceanography has been done by China, Japan, Russia and USA (alphabetic order) there are other good sources I have had to resort to in removing English ambiguity in articles in areas of interest to me. The reference used, correctly says for the time it was written, Butakov Guyot(Magellan Rise) and should stand in my view and not be removed by those who attempt to explain name ambiguity. I understand Notes to an article can be useful for such issues. Inputting the name Butakov Guyot, a long accepted name into the gazetteer, you get a lat and long thrown back at you for the Guyot inconsistent with any currently accepted Magellan Rise but fully consistent with a location in the Magellan Seamounts. It is also possible to search for the name Magellan Rise and identify the now deleted seamount entry for this name in the gazetteer. Other sources exist with regard to such naming issues in the North West Pacific where the predominant seabed research has been done by several nations . The coordinates of now accepted term for the geographical feature called the Magellan Rise can be found at Marine Gazetteer:Magellan Rise, Marine Gazetteer:North Magellan Rise. Please feel free to consider reverting your reversion and modifying it for clarity, if you accept these verifiable references or using any portion of my text above without attribution. ChaseKiwi (talk) 03:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- See, the problem is that as far as I can see there doesn't seem to be widespread confusion, even among the sources. With the information we have, we can say that there are two structures, but not that they get confused. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 March 2023
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Your GA nomination of TRAPPIST-1
The article TRAPPIST-1 you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:TRAPPIST-1 for comments about the article, and Talk:TRAPPIST-1/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Robminchin -- Robminchin (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
Volcano/Sea mount GANs
Hi -- I am picking up some GA reviews, and was about to take one of the nominations at Wikipedia:Good article nominations#Earth sciences, where a newish editor has nominated three articles very reminiscent of the ones you work on. I wondered if you'd noticed them; you'd be a perfect reviewer for those, if you have time. If not I'll pick at least one of them up myself, but I thought I'd check with you first. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Greetings, Mike Christie. I might take a look as I once considered working on West Mata, but I have some other projects going so it might take a while (I am half-hoping for a review on TRAPPIST-1; it passed GAN but failed FAC twice). Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- I can't promise anything quickly, but I'd be willing to do a copyedit pass on TRAPPIST-1 if you like. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Mike Christie:Aye, I'd like to ask for one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- I can't promise anything quickly, but I'd be willing to do a copyedit pass on TRAPPIST-1 if you like. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article K2-18b you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 19:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, you protected this page indefinitely in October 2019 citing persistent sock puppetry but... there was no prior page history? 67.180.143.89 (talk) 06:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Greetings, it was per this request. Apparently these pages were under attack from a sockpuppeteer at that time. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Do you believe that talk page protection is still warranted? 67.180.143.89 (talk) 15:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Nah, pulled it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Do you believe that talk page protection is still warranted? 67.180.143.89 (talk) 15:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)