History section quality? edit

Fixed some minor spelling/grammar issues here. Is the info acceptable under Wikipedia standards? Almost all of it was copied verbatim from their website (I made slight changes but left the majority of it intact). In the original editor's defence, the sources cited are working/appropriate links. If a more experienced editor can give it a quality check, it would be much appreciated. -Achiox 19:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achiox (talkcontribs)