| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I want feedback on how I can improve this article to GA status.
Thanks, 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 ⚧ 【=◈︿◈=】 21:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- You can try avoiding biased, exaggerated words like "infamous" for starters. Maybe the techniques can be better explained somehow, too? - OpalYosutebito (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also, social media sites such as YouTube are generally unreliable, as they're user-generated websites. Maybe try finding official articles instead? - OpalYosutebito (talk) 08:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Opal, sorry for intrusion, but in this case I think sources such as ref 19 (Firstpost) and ref 28 (The Guardian) can be spared as they were released via YouTube by reliable publications. Thoughts? dxneo (talk) 09:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me - OpalYosutebito (talk) 10:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Opal, sorry for intrusion, but in this case I think sources such as ref 19 (Firstpost) and ref 28 (The Guardian) can be spared as they were released via YouTube by reliable publications. Thoughts? dxneo (talk) 09:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
You can check out MOS:VG to see how video game articles are supposed to be written and WP:VG/RS for reference reliability. The legacy, reception, and development look like they could be expanded. Considering that this is an older game, there might be a problem in finding sources that cover those things. I'd recommend you to check out similar GAs from this era and see how they were written. Super Mario Land looks like a good example. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 13:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)