Talk:Meltan/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 22:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Fathoms Below (talk · contribs) 20:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Kung Fu Man and Pokelego999. I should be able to look at the article this week. Haven't reviewed a GA in a few months so might take some time to get back into things. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

A couple initial comments

• The contextual introduction to what a Pokémon is in the "Conception and development" section is consistent with similar character articles in this topic area. Check.
• Earwig's doesn't show any issues with copyright, will do checks for close paraphrasing along with spot-checks.
• Images are tagged with appropriate WP:FURs.

Fathoms Below (talk) 20:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)