Talk:RealSports Baseball

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Hawkeye7 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk23:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that the Atari 2600 version of RealSports Baseball received a "certificate of merit" in the "Best Sports Videogame" category at the 1984 Arkie Awards, while the 5200 version received one at the 1985 Arkie Awards? 1984 award can be seen here a p.72, 1985 award can be seen here at p.28
  • Comment: This is my first DYK nom, please be gentle!

Created by FOARP (talk). Self-nominated at 19:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC).Reply


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:   - no
QPQ: None required.

Overall:   Nice, nostalgic read. For the hook, there are more interesting options than a "certificate of merit", which appears to be the equivalent of an honorable mention. Suggestions include (but are not limited to) the game being a response to Intellivision or an upgarde to Home Run. —Bagumba (talk) 03:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

sufficiently hookified? FOARP (talk) 09:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@FOARP: Almost there. There's a 200 character limit, so I'd suggest removing the specific publications from the hook (they still need to be added and sourced in the article). Atari should be in the hook (e.g. "that RealSports Baseball, Atari's response to ...) Remove "aggressive" from the hook (if not the article too). The Main Page draws more WP:NPOV / WP:OR scrutiny, and it would need more sources to meet WP:DUE.—Bagumba (talk) 10:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
* ALT1b:... that RealSports Baseball was Atari's response to an Intellivision marketing campaign fronted by George Plimpton, and won an award for best sports game awards in 1983? See p.46 here and Intellivision advert here
Hmm... having problems verifying that second best sports game award as it's not clear what magazine is being referred to, VGU renamed itself Computer Entertainer so it's already mentioned in the article. Better keep it to 1983. FOARP (talk) 14:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@FOARP: From the source, it was an award for 1983 that was published in a 1984 issue. It's debatable for the hook to say it was won in 1983, "for 1983" seems more accurate. Also, the year is unclear in the current WP article prose. For hook 1b, "award" and "awards" is repetitive. Finally, the name of the publication from the source's first page is strangely "The Video Game Update includes Video Entertainer". On p.159, it reads "All awards are at the sole discretion of "THE VIDEO GAME UPDATE ..." Not directly related to the hook, but perhaps it was still more known as Video Game Update at the time of the award.—Bagumba (talk) 11:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks for the feedback and apologies for putting you through all these revisions. I'll update the article to note that CE was also known as VGU and clarify the year of award in the prose. Hook updated per your comments -
@Bagumba: Looks great to me. Apologies over the number of revisions this has been through. FOARP (talk) 15:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Tung

edit

Joseph Tung is credited on multiple websites (e.g., Moby Games) as the original designer of this game. However there is no reliable source for this. I see Joseph Tung is the author of a self-published book called "Cloning Jesus" that contains the claim that he designed RealSports Baseball. I think it quite likely that Tung himself is the source of the claim and that this claim has made it onto multiple websites through a form of citogenesis. Tung also claims to have developed Galaxian, which seems unlikely - this was a Namco game.

There is no record that I could find of a Joseph Tung having worked for Atari at the relevant time. There is a Joseph Tung who worked on Halo:Reach, but he appears too young to have been developing games in the early 1980s. There is also a Joseph Tung who worked at IBM and in 1981 went on to found Rotating Memory Systems, but this is obviously not the person who developed RealSports Baseball in 1982. Retro Gamer UK credits Keithen Hayenga as the progenitor of this game but the quote from him is unclear as to whether he actually designed the 2600 version or just finished the 5200 version.

TL;DR - there is no reliable source saying Tung designed this game and as such I'm striking this claim. Based on this interview it seems likely that Andreason probably designed the 2600 version but without a source explicitly saying so we'll have to leave this point open. FOARP (talk) 17:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply