Talk:FreeCol

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Be..anyone in topic Not a manual

Speedy Deletion

edit

This is a fairly popluar game with 17,000 hits in Google. Kc4 21:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have made a few styleistic edits and removed plagerised material. Kc4 21:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Development Information

edit

Is it within the scope of the Wikipedia article to discuss the development of the game? Information on this could be found on the game's website and from the project of the month article. 193.157.182.115 13:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I was thinking the same thing, and including information on how the game differs or improves on the original Colonization. Ianboggs 04:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

-Good idea! 193.157.188.13 13:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

FreeCol 0.11.0 released

edit

http://www.freecol.org/news/freecol-0.11.0-released.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anttipng (talkcontribs) 19:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Criticism

edit

Inspired by the wpde article, I added some criticism to this article. Whoever disagrees should read Zinn. User:ScotXWt@lk 16:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't criticism sections be used to refer to existing criticism, and not simply add an arbitrary novel critique? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.158.218 (talkcontribs)
Yes, they should. Removed it. The dewiki example is equally problematic, using sources that discussion Civ IV to comment on FreeCol. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not a manual

edit

FreeCol has a rather decent manual, and it's covered by the civilization wikia to some degree (+libregamewiki). Can we please get rid of some details here as suggested by Qwertyus in this diff? –Be..anyone 💩 05:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply