Talk:Daxter

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Not trying to hate, but... edit

Why is Daxter the only character in the series to have his own seprate Wikipedia article? What makes him more notable than Jak, or the other major characters? I don't mean to editorialize here, but I thought I'd just point that out.- 24.222.194.150 (talk) 00:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notability on Wikipedia is determined through significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Daxter shows this. Jak does not. Jak has a few sources that are good, but needs more. Blake (Talk·Edits) 01:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I see. Thanks for explaining. -- 24.222.194.150 (talk) 20:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daxter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply