Talk:American Challenge: A Sailing Simulation

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (7 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Stick Soldiers (1 participant)
Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (6 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (15 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)

Articles that need...

Sailing Low‑importance

	American Challenge: A Sailing Simulation is within the scope of the WikiProject Sailing, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sailing. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.SailingWikipedia:WikiProject SailingTemplate:WikiProject SailingSailing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reassessing this article edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Anarchyte:@Videogameplayer99:@Ifnord:@Timtempleton:@The Gnome:@Lee Vilenski:

Hi all, I didn't take part in the deletion discussion when it took place, so I've had this article userfied while I locate sources to improve it and demonstrate its notability. I've done a quick search now and placed some links to new sources at the top. Please asses these sources alongside the previous sources and make a new assessment. If it's assessed that the article is notable, I will invest time into improving it properly.

Regards, Coin945--Coin945 (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm the only one who didn't vote delete in the original discussion, instead voting weak keep. With the new sources, my weak keep becomes a keep. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic