Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/5/Society

WikiProject iconVital Articles
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Vital Articles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of vital articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and work together to increase the quality of Wikipedia's essential articles.
Level 5 Subpages

Introduction

edit

The purpose of this discussion page is to select 50,000 topics for which Wikipedia should have high-quality articles.

Any article currently on this list may be challenged. The discussion is open to the following rules:

Voting count table (>60%)
P = passes
F = fails
opposing votes
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
supporting votes
F F F F F F
1 F F F F F F F
2 F F F F F F F F
3 F F F F F F F F F
4 P P P F F F F F F F
5 P P P P F F F F F F
6 P P P P F F F F F F
7 P P P P P F F F F F
8 P P P P P P F F F F
9 P P P P P P F F F F
  1. Before being closed, a Level 5 proposal must:
    1. Run for at least 14 days days; AND
    2. Allow at least 7 days after the most recent vote; AND
    3. Have at least 4 participants.
  2. For a proposal to be implemented on the Level 5 list:
    1. It must have over 60% support (see table); AND
    2. It must have at least 4 support votes !votes.

For reference, the following times apply for today:

  • 14 days ago is: 22:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
  • 7 days ago is: 22:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

The following link represent all current Level 5 Vital articles that are classified as Society subjects:

Add Sous vide

edit

Another very common food preparation technique.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🚰 (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Weakly. Pretty niche but still seems common enough to include. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Niche, and rated Mid-importance in Wikiproject Food and drink Makkool (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Homemaking

edit

It's synonymous with Housekeeping   5. I don't know if that makes it vital or not, but it's a common daily activity for many people.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🚰 (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Very common. starship.paint 02:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 22:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Makkool (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Shunning

edit

More of a general concept. 8 iwikis, ~150 dailies. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 07:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 00:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose

Add Chilling effect

edit

More of a general concept. 12 iwikis, ~150 dailies. Maybe could go under psychology? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 07:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. less vital than Coercion   5 or Censorship   4-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per above Makkool (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Labeling theory

edit

From the article: "The theory was prominent during the 1960s and 1970s, and some modified versions of the theory have developed and are still currently popular." This is included in high school sociology textbooks.

Support
  1. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 09:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Mentioned often enough in modern sociological literature too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Rated mid-importance in its Wikiprojects. Would support Self-fulfilling prophecy instead. Makkool (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral
Discuss

Add Taiwanese Mandarin

edit

The standard variety of language spoken in Taiwan   3.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 09:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support only swap. We already list 16 varieties of Chinese. I suggest swapping Huizhou Chinese which has only 5 million speakers, compared to Taiwanese Mandarin having 4,6 million first language and 15 million second language speakers. --Makkool (talk) 12:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 00:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Posture (psychology)

edit
Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 13:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 16:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Krakus

edit

A bit above we are discussing adding "The mythical founder of the first Korean kingdom." (3:0 right now). Well, ok, here's the Polish equivalent. 21 interwikis. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nom.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Rapport

edit

Not too sure about this (only 13 interwikis) but it may be a viable concept at V5.

Support
  1. Weak support as nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Positive psychology

edit

Somewhat recent (started in 1998) but it has now become a major concept in the study of psychology.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 18:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Racial discrimination

edit

A major subtopic of Racism   3.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 09:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Product (business)

edit

The outcome of a process. Do I have to explain this further?

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Subtopics of Management  3

edit

Place under Management   3 at Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences/Politics and economics

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 19:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Place under Management   3 at Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences/Politics and economics

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support but disagree with placing it as a subtopic of management, which in its default and common meaning refers to managing people. Asset management is a subtopic of corporate finance (a key service that many banks and other financial institutions perform around the world). Gizza (talk) 23:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Place under Management   3 at Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences/Politics and economics

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support - to have companies like Oracle Corporation   5 who mainly sell CRM software as a company listed but not the overarching concept itself is wrong. Gizza (talk) 01:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Place either under Resource   5 or Management   3 at Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences/Politics and economics

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Place either under Resource   5 or Management   3 at Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences/Politics and economics

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Place under Management   3 at Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences/Politics and economics

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Place under Education on the Culture page?

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 15:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Wanted to propose this myself a few weeks back and completely forgot so thanks for this (though I think the page should just be renamed to library science). Aurangzebra (talk) 06:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Place under Management   3 at Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences/Politics and economics

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 15:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makes sense. QuicoleJR (talk) 02:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Can be under Management   3 at Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences/Politics and economics, can be under Technology

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 15:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Subtopics of Property  3

edit

The concept of "real estate developed for profit" is increasingly common around the world.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 18:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

One of the few major types of Property   3

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


ditto

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 18:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Decision-making

edit

Compare Problem solving   5 (although this is more of a psychology topic rather than a technology one).

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. 19:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Personal finance

edit

Place under Finance   3?

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:14, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Consumer behaviour

edit

Place either under Psychology or Business

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 15:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Either this article for behavioral economics is fine. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Weak oppose, would prefer to add behavioral economics instead since it's more broad. The Blue Rider   13:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Transactions

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



A major type of business which facilitates all sorts of transactions. Place under Business.

Support
  1. Nom. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 05:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The concept of an "agent" should be vital

Support
  1. Nom. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


A major part of everyday life.

Support
  1. Nom. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 05:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The money gained by platforms such as Uber   5, Airbnb   5, or Apple Inc.   4's App Store (Apple) when facilitating transactions between a seller and a buyer. Apple in particular got into quite a lot of controversy recently with the EU with regards to how much commission it charges software developers.

Support
  1. Nom. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 05:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


A historically important means of Trade   2 which remains common in less-developed societies.

Support
  1. Nom. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 05:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. An important concept (even if anthropologists have shown that this doesn't really happen). SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. One of economic anthropology's insights is that barter is historically rare. Non-market exchange is usually in the form of a gift economy. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pawn shops are a common type of business.

Support
  1. Nom. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Social relation

edit

Social interaction redirects here. Different social interactions combine to form a Social network   4. I think it's an important concept in Social studies.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 04:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Obviously. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Subtopics of Construction  3

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Works well as an overview article.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 06:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A common entity in the process of construction

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 06:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Makes sense. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Another common entity involved in construction

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 06:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Makes sense. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



One of the most common processes around the world.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 06:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Orisha, Shango, and Oshun

edit

Right now, we only have two articles listed under African mythological figures. I think we can afford having at least one or two more. The Orishas are the de facto pantheon of Santería, Candomblé, and the original Yoruba religion. (I know that they’re just spirits who are only worshipped like gods due to how distant the actual one is.) If possible, I would like to nominate one of the Orishas by themselves. Out of all of them, I think Shango is the most well-known. NOTE: Proposal now includes Oshun, per Makkool.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 01:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support. If we would add Shango, then Oshun would warrant a place as well as a female Orisha (and her article states that "Oshun is one of the most popular and venerated Orishas"). --Makkool (talk) 06:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Iostn (talk) 23:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Histoire de Melody Nelson

edit

Usually held to be the magnum opus for Serge Gainsbourg   4. Other than Trans Europa Express (which has an English version) and the Miles Davis albums (which are instrumentals), all of the albums listed are in English. Of all the non-English albums we have articles for, this is probably the most vital.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support --Makkool (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Caravan (Juan Tizol and Duke Ellington song) and Stardust (1927 song)

edit

These two song are stated in the intro of jazz standard to be one of the most covered songs of all time. Admittedly, the “Stardust” article does a much better job explaining its vitality than “Caravan”’s article.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support --Makkool (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

I also noticed that we don’t have any compilation albums on here as well. Now, unlike live albums, I don’t think it’s necessary to have any compilations on here. That said, I do feel like that these three are at least important enough to worth discussion on including to this list.

First, we got King of the Delta Blues Singers by Robert Johnson   4. For a lot of people like Bob Dylan   4, Keith Richards   5, Robert Plant   5, and Eric Clapton   5 this was the first time they’ve heard of Johnson, and boy did it changed their lives forever. I think it’s safe to say rock would’ve been a completely different beast if this album has not been released.

The next album is usually held to help fuel the American folk music revival scene. A lot of folk musicians are believed to be inspired by this album, and a lot of musicians on this compilation will later see their careers revived. Includes recordings by Carter Family   5, Charley Patton   5, Blind Lemon Jefferson   5, and Uncle Dave Macon   5.

The last one is admittedly the weakest of the three. I’m only mentioning this because I believe that this is usually held to be the greatest Christmas album ever made. A fine example of the Wall of Sound championed by Phil Spector   5. Has very nice renditions of “Frosty the Snowman”, “Sleigh Ride”, and “I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus” by The Ronettes   5, and brought us “Christmas (Baby Please Come Home)”.

Add King of the Delta Blues Singers
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 05:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Add Anthology of American Folk Music
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 04:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Add A Christmas Gift for You from Phil Spector
Oppose
  1. All have 6 interwikis, suggesting lack of cross-cultural signficance. starship.paint 08:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
  2. Per above. Also, if these are to be added only to include compilation albums, we should hold for now. --Makkool (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Technical support

edit

A major component of Customer service   5 (nominated above) in relation to products and services which consumers do not know how to use.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Cold War strategies

edit

There were three main stratigies applied by the US during the Cold War, détente, containment and rollback. The Blue Rider   12:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@The Blue Rider: wouldn't these be better placed in "History?" Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hm, not really even though they became popular they are still used nowadays. The Blue Rider   15:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Détente is a strategy aimed at relaxing tensions between two countries. It was first utilized by the Kennedy administration during the Cuban Missile Crisis   4, which ultimately led to the establishment of the red telephone. This approach was further employed by Richard Nixon, resulting in the negotiation of several important treaties, including the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and the Helsinki Accords (both should also be added). Détente played a crucial role in bringing an end to the Vietnam War and contributed to the improvement of relations between the US and China, ultimately leading to China's entrance into the United Nations. The Blue Rider   12:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   12:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Containment was a strategy aimed at halting the spread of communism, largely driven by the belief in the domino theory (which should also be added). With the fall of China, Cuba, and other nations to communism, Harry Truman, through his Truman Doctrine   5, initiated interventions in multiple countries that were on the brink of succumbing to communism. These interventions included the Greek Civil War   5, the Korean War   4, the Vietnam War   4, Guatemalan Civil War   5, among others. The Blue Rider   12:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   12:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The final strategy, and the most aggressive one, involved actively intervening in communist countries with the aim of changing their regimes. This approach was primarily utilized by Reagan and the Bushes administrations. It resulted in interventions such as the Bay of Pigs Invasion   5, support for the Contras in Nicaragua, the United States invasion of Grenada   5, and more recently, the United States invasion of Afghanistan. The Blue Rider   13:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   12:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add record label

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This is the main way the recording part of the Music industry   4 is organized.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 12:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 13:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. feminist🩸 (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 20:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. Vileplume (talk) 00:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  7. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Film studio

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Similar to the Record label nomination above.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 20:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 10:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Imperial examination

edit

For centuries, the imperial examination system profoundly influenced Imperial China's society, determining social status and governance. It provided a path for social advancement based on merit. It legitimized the ruling dynasty, ensured political stability, and reinforced cultural norms through its emphasis on Confucian ideology. However, it perpetuated gender inequality by excluding women. And was apperently important for Chinese mythology (see Imperial examination in Chinese mythology). All the elite of Imperial China was a jinshi, the highest degree of the exam. In essence, the imperial examination system shaped Chinese society, governance, and culture, leaving a lasting impact on its civilization. The Blue Rider   20:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   20:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 20:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. This feels VA5-worthy based on vibes. I consider this to be more of a History topic however. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 20:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add United Artists

edit

Founded by D. W. Griffith   4, Charlie Chaplin   3, Mary Pickford   4, and Douglas Fairbanks   5, this used to be one of the major studios.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 20:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. I don't think we should list any American film studios beyond the current major studios. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Subscription business model

edit

Subscriptions are a big and growing thing in business.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Hanna-Barbera

edit

Although we do have William Hanna   5 and Joseph Barbera   5 on here along with some shows, I still think we need the company. They’re responsible for a large chunk of American TV animation (and for some periods, most of it).

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 08:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Swap Crazy in Love  5 with Hey Ya!

edit

I will admit, I’ve been going overboard with my specific musical works suggestion, so this is going to be my last one for the time being. It is sort of weird to nominate something that’s not representative of the artist usual work (of Outkast’s possible vital works that are, you know, hip-hop, it’s either “B.O.B” or Aquemini), but this song is still being praised to high-heaven as being one of the greatest songs ever made. It was already noticeable for being the youngest song to appear on the Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs of All Time when it was ranked at #182; the newest version has this at #10. To make up for my lack of swaps in my proposals, I volunteer “Crazy in Love” for removal, as that song came out the same year as this.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 11:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support --Makkool (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

Add Scandal

edit

A major concept in sociology, one that is commonly the subject of news coverage. Maybe place under Social norm   4 in Sociology?

Support
  1. feminist🩸 (talk) 11:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 09:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. Vital. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Should be listed, now if only the news would shut up about them. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 09:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  7. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Patriarchy

edit

Seems like an obvious oversight, an extremely widespread social system. The Blue Rider   20:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   20:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 21:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. I hesitate to agree that "an extremely widespread social system" is automatically grounds for vitality inclusion. Patriarchy is a term that can be applied to many social systems, but it's one of many terms; it's similar to, say, Capitalism   3 or Democracy   3 in this regard. Not all such terms which can be used to describe "extremely widespread" phenomena are vital. But in any case, patriarchy is a major concept in both anthropology and sociology which is suitable for V5. feminist🩸 (talk) 01:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. per above. starship.paint 09:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  5. Important. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. Vileplume (talk) 14:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add By-product

edit

A common concept in manufacturing and chemistry.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 07:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 09:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  3. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 12:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Hoax to Interpersonal relations

edit

Relevant to politics, at least.

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 10:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 12:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Biographical film

edit

Biopics are a major film genre. Biography   4, a parent topic, is at V4.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 01:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Policy

edit

Parent topic to Public policy   4.

Support
  1. As nom. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 13:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
  3. The Blue Rider   14:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Most policies are implemented by governments, so it is right for Public policy   4 to be at a higher level than Policy. However, thinks like "staff policy" and "insurance policy" exist and are common. feminist🩸 (talk) 12:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add An Essay on the Principle of Population

edit

Thomas Malthus's magnum opus, continues to shape economic theory and social policy; from the decay of the English Poor Laws, to the works and ideas of important philosophers and economists, such as David Ricardo   4 and Adam Smith   3. His ideas, Malthusianism   5, that come from the book, explore the relationship between population growth and resources, has influenced debates on birth control, income distribution, and sustainable development. Malthus's insights remain relevant today, informing discussions on global challenges like climate change and poverty alleviation. The Blue Rider   18:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   18:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. V5 importance, although overlap with V5 Malthusianism is significant. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Rechtsstaat

edit

The Rechtsstaat, originating in German Jurisprudence   4, embodies principles of legal certainty, equality before the law, and protection of individual rights. This principle depends on the Separation of powers   4, ensuring Judicial independence   5 and impartiality. It emphasizes the rule of law as a safeguard against arbitrary government actions, ensuring that legal processes are transparent, predictable, and fair. The doctrine has influenced constitutionalism and legal theory globally, contributing to the development of democratic governance and the protection of human rights in diverse countries

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   14:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. Makkool (talk) 20:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Market fundamentalism  5

edit

A mostly negative term that overlaps with Neoliberalism   5. I personally have not heard this one in a while.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 01:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 15:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Prosthetic makeup

edit

This is important enough for an Academy Award to be dedicated to it.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Don't really have a great explanation for why I oppose besides the fact that this just seems much less important than the other film topics we currently list. Prosthetic makeup feels like a part of the movie making experience in the same way that craft service is: it is ubiquitous in movie productions but not necessarily a V5-vital topic. And the Academy Award category is for makeup/Cosmetics   4 in general, not just prosthetic makeup. Aurangzebra (talk) 11:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I guess the main difference is that the audience can see prosthetic makeup as it is applied, whereas craft service is more of a backstage thing that readers are less likely to care about. But point taken regarding this being relatively niche among film topics compared to what we currently list. feminist🩸 (talk) 11:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Corporal punishment

edit

A historically common form of Punishment   4 which persists in some countries. Compare Capital punishment   4, which is at V4.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 06:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Pretty important. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Foreshadowing

edit

An essential part of storytelling, used in a majority of all stories.

Support
  1. As nom. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Iostn (talk) 21:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discuss

Add Lebensraum

edit

Lebensraum, a geopolitical concept coined by Friedrich Ratzel, that posits that territories are living organisms and, as so, need to expand in order to provide for their population. This idea was notably adopted and distorted by the Nazi Party during World War II to justify their aggressive expansionist policies. Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime used the concept of Lebensraum to justify their invasions and annexations of neighboring territories, particularly in Eastern Europe, under the pretext of securing land for the German people. This expansionist ideology was a key component of Nazi propaganda and played a significant role in shaping the course of World War II. The Blue Rider   17:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   17:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Iostn (talk) 21:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove New York Public Library  5 and Boston Public Library  5

edit

I don't think we need any libraries that are not national libraries at this level. I think Library of Congress is sufficient for US libraries. Interstellarity (talk) 01:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support NYPL
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 01:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support BPL
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 01:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Only the fifth largest library in the US. Possible swap for Shanghai Library? Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose NYPL
  1. Strong oppose. We should have two American libraries, and it is the world’s fourth largest at 55 million catalogued items. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @OhnoitsvileplumeXD: Different sources have different criteria regarding how big libraries are. NYPL is the second biggest by catalog size, but BPL is the largest by volumes held. I think this is something we should consider when deciding what to remove an add. Interstellarity (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Interstellarity: I was just going off List of largest libraries, where only the catalogue size is listed. I still see the NYPL as more vital, as it has double the interwikis and triple the daily views. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 13:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @OhnoitsvileplumeXD: I found these articles at here and here. One article has the NYPL as larger and the other has BPL as larger, but if you still think NYPL is more vital, I’ll respect your opinion on that. Interstellarity (talk) 14:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose BPL
Discussion

Add Damage

edit

A very common concept, albeit somewhat dicdef. Should be V5.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Do you guys ever think about dying?

edit

An important healthcare industry. Only 1 interwiki and 13 daily views last year – I'm surprised, but I guess it's because the term "deathcare" is more of an American concept. Is there something I'm missing here?

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Morgue and Funeral   4 should already cover this. The Blue Rider   10:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

A common business worldwide, more important than e.g. Motel   5 I'd say.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



An important type of facility which helps preserve bodies.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. The Blue Rider   10:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  5. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 13:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The modern equivalent to Mausoleum   5.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  3. --Thi (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



A dead human body, also known as a corpse. Can be used by students and scientists to study anatomy and diseases, and also has a major role in popular culture. Probably more of a medicine/biology topic but since I'm doing a bulk nomination I'll place it here anyway.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. The Blue Rider   10:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Put in Medicine. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  5. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 13:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A common broad concept denoting situations where a person or a group of people face psychological stress. This can go under Psychology, or it can go under Society (next to Disaster   5).

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 07:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. The Blue Rider   10:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Why do we live? An existential crisis is a feeling that most people will experience at some point in their life. Hugely influential in society and culture.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 07:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makes sense. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

I must go punch that baby

edit

Society reacts differently to people committing crimes when they are underage. It's an important area in Criminology   4 with influences from the family environment and peers, and differences in how they are tried (e.g. Juvenile court) and punished (e.g. juvenile homes rather than prisons) to reflect their different level of cognitive development.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The age one must be in order to be capable of committing an offence. If one is too young, one is presumed to not be able to tell whether something should be wrong or not. An important concept comparable to, say, Age of consent   4.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

At what age do you become an adult? Different societies think differently on this, but it's usually somewhere between 18 and 21. An important concept which relates to whether you can drink, consent to sexual activity, and be liable for criminal acts (see nomination above).

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 06:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Striking is the primary way Hand-to-hand combat   5 (nominated above) is conducted, but it should be listed separately because variations of strikes are also employed in Martial arts   3 and combat sports.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

A strike (nominated above) conducted with the fist. It is used in most martial arts and combat sports, and is the only type of offensive technique allowed in Boxing   4.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. The Blue Rider   10:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

A strike (nominated above) using the leg. Used in many forms of martial arts, as well as in self-defense applications.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. The Blue Rider   10:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Party time!

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Not on the same pair as, say, sex on the beach, cosmopolitan, margarita, piña colada. Not a widely drank cocktail, since its too contained in Southern United States. Only 17 interwikis links.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   11:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  3. Niche cocktails need to go Gizza (talk) 02:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Too american centric, especially when we already list American whiskey   5. According to the article, it is legally defined as Bourbon whiskey   5 in some international trade agreemeents, so the overlap is big. Not a major type of whiskey in general; only 14 interwikis links.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   11:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 05:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 10:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Not a major type of whiskey in any measure, not on the same pair as, say, Irish whiskey   5, Bourbon whiskey   5 nor Scotch whisky   5. Only 13 interwiki links.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   11:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 05:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 10:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Not on the same pair as, say, sex on the beach, cosmopolitan, margarita, piña colada. Only 23 interwiki links.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   11:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  3. --Thi (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Widely drank worldwide, with an history that dates back to colonial times. 47 interwiki links.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   11:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 11:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
  4. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 05:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 10:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Brazilian cocktail that its part of the cultural identity of the country. 39 interwiki links.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   11:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Rated mid-importance Makkool (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Extremely famous drink in Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries, so signficant that its part of the cultural identities. 50 interwiki links.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   11:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 20:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. per nom. Makkool (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Swap: Add The Rose of Versailles, remove Cardcaptor Sakura  5

edit

The former is decades older and has better claims of vitality, and they have sold a similar amount. Cardcaptor Sakura feels a somewhat questionable inclusion to me, seeming not quite popular/acclaimed/influential/famous enough to be preferred over something like Berserk (manga) or even Monster (manga) (which are scored into the top 10 of various manga sites by their users).

(I initially thought about replacing Cardcaptor with Berserk but eventually decided on a shoujo-shoujo swap, and I'm wondering a bit whether some of Berserk's vitality claims might be too inspired by the 2021 death of its author.)

Support
  1. As nom.--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 18:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

No votes in a long time. If this proposal goes nowhere I may propose a swap with Berserk (manga) instead.--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 09:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Some world's fairs

edit

Heralded within the newly constructed The Crystal Palace, millions of people visited the world's fair. This venue served as a showcase for the pioneering innovations of the First Industrial Revolution, namely the Hydraulic press, Steam engine   3, and Spinning machine. Its significance extended far beyond the exhibition, as it became a beacon of enlightenment, spreading a wealth of knowledge and inspiration to nations across the globe. The Blue Rider   19:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   19:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Weak oppose. I'm not yet convinced that individual world's fairs, which only have historical importance, should be listed when we keep finding enduring society-wide topics that are not yet listed. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    World's fair   4 is a level 4 article, surely examples of world's fair merit an inclusion in level 5. The Blue Rider   10:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I would support swapping World's fair for Exhibition at level 4. Plus, we have many articles listed at V4 for which we don't list subtopics or examples at V5. I guess I just generally support having more common noun topics and less Proper noun   5 ones. feminist🩸 (talk) 12:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Like the Great Exhibition, the world's fair drew in millions upon millions of visitors. The event saw the birth of iconic landmarks like the Eiffel Tower   4. Renowned figures such as Thomas Edison   3 and Nikola Tesla   3 were present. The fair served as a way to spread of knowledge, inspiring the generations to come. The Blue Rider   19:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   19:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Weak oppose. I'm not yet convinced that individual world's fairs, which only have historical importance, should be listed when we keep finding enduring society-wide topics that are not yet listed. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

The same rationale as the previous ones but applied to the United States.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   19:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Weak oppose. I'm not yet convinced that individual world's fairs, which only have historical importance, should be listed when we keep finding enduring society-wide topics that are not yet listed. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

(not OP) Add Exhibition

edit

The parent topic to World's fair   4 and to some extent Convention center   5 (because they can host both Convention (meeting)   5 and exhibitions). Should be listed before we add individual world's fairs imo.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 20:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
edit

A common venue for the exhibition of Visual arts   2, in the same vein as Museum   3, World's fair   4, or Convention center   5.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 03:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makkool (talk) 20:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Siesta

edit

An enduring cross-cultural practice.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. --LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 10:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Big in Spanish-speaking countries. The Blue Rider   12:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Makkool (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Social organization

edit

"Collectivism" redirects here. I think collectivism should be listed at the same level as Individualism   5.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Personal development

edit

A process that everyone goes through. Or is it too vague as a concept?

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 06:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Phrygian cap

edit

Historically relevant piece of clothing and heraldic symbol.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. --Thi (talk) 13:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. It was even made into the 2024 Olympic mascot. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Daedalus

edit

The creator of the laybrinth and father of Icarus   5. The Blue Rider   21:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   21:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Famous enough to be V5, MHO. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 13:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Political party additions

edit

One of the longest-ruling dominant parties in the world, in a country with a population of over 100 million. Also, Latin American parties are unrepresented.

Support
  1. As nom. Iostn (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 01:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

The main organ of Peronism that remains extant today, albeit in a very complex and divided fashion.

Support
  1. As nom. Iostn (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

Pan-Arab precusor to the longtime sole ruling parties of both Syria and Iraq.

Support
  1. As nom. Iostn (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makkool (talk) 08:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

The most powerful political force for decades in one of the states party to the one of the world's longest-running conflicts. We also list both the Palestine Liberation Organization   5 and Hamas   5.

Support
  1. As nom. Iostn (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

Sole ruling party in state of over 100 million people - I think this may be the largest ML state aside from China and the USSR, actually.

Support
  1. As nom. Iostn (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Vital at this level, surely. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 01:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. It's at around 99 million, but vital nevertheless. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 01:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Per nominator. The Blue Rider   03:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  7. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

Dominant party for 40+ years, plus Apartheid   4 is VA4. African National Congress   5 is already listed.

Support
  1. As nom. Iostn (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

Dominant party in Angola for the past 40/50 years, plus one of the main parties to the Angolan Civil War   4 at VA4.

Support
  1. As nom. Iostn (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Not only in the Angolan Civil War but also in the Angolan War of Independence   5. The Blue Rider   16:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

Add Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication

edit

Major oversight! This is how international economical cooperation is made possible. The Blue Rider   15:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   15:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. This is more widely known by its acronym, SWIFT, which is massive in international payments. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Public good (economics)

edit

There are three types of goods in economics, private goods, common goods and public goods. Public goods are of the interest of the state and are specially important in welfare states. They are also widely studied in the field of economics because they have a grand influence in the policies of a state; one must decide whether to allocate resources toward public goods provision through taxation and government spending or to leave their provision to the private sector, considering factors such as efficiency, equity, and the role of government in promoting societal welfare. The Blue Rider   15:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   15:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Since the other 2 are not listed.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  1. Two wrongs don't make a right, plus public goods are the most immportant of them all. The Blue Rider   19:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add We Will Rock You

edit

Since my attempt to remove "We Are the Champions” failed, I am now advocating for the addition of "We Will Rock You". Again, I don't think you can choose one song over the other; these songs are almost always played back to back.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 18:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. We Are the Champions and We Will Rock You are admittedly closely linked. However, the former has significantly more long-lasting cultural impact.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. I might support a swap with some other song, but oppose a straight-up addition. We are getting over-quota in Arts. Makkool (talk) 16:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss
  1. I fully agree that this song is V5 worthy, but per above comments, artists and associated works is an extremely bloated area and its making me hesitant to support an addition without super good reasoning. If we can have five or six different albums from The Beatles   3, I think we can have a third song from Queen (band)   4. On the other hand though, music could probably use a full cleanup, like what we just did video games. λ NegativeMP1 02:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add Cyberspace

edit

Important concept in science and fiction, 49 interwikis. Almost 7k daily pageviews. Not sure which section to add this too, suggestions welcome. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. as nom --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Some businesses analysis

edit

Basic concepts that are taught at businesses and economics bachelor's. The Blue Rider   17:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Widely used framework that companies utilize to help decision-making, specifically their strenghts (S), weaknesses (W), opportunities (O) and threats (T); 57 interwikis. The Blue Rider   17:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   17:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Very widely used term in business. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Another widely used framework that companies utilize to know their macro-environmental factors, such as political (P), economic (E), social (S) and technological (T); sometimes it is extended as PESTEL to include other factors. 35 interwikis. The Blue Rider   17:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   17:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Finally, a widely method used to get a sense of the competition a company is facing. It includes, threat of new entrants, threat of substitutes, bargaining power of customers, bargaining power of suppliers and competitive rivalry. 34 interwikis. The Blue Rider   17:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   17:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Very famous framework in business. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
edit

I'm sure there are more articles that could be added but this is what I gathered from a quick glance. Also, I'm only going to provide very brief reasonings since I don't have the patient to do longer ones as of now. The Blue Rider   03:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Extremely important since it allows the free movement of people in 29 countries without any kind of Border control   5.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   03:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. A key concept for the EU. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. per above. starship.paint 13:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
  5. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 17:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. Iostn (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  7. Obviously. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  8. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 23:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Equally important since it allows the free movement of capital, people, services and goods in 32 countries.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   03:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. A key concept for the EU. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Iostn (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

It created the European Union   3 and its main pillars!

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   03:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Iostn (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. As important as the Treaty of Lisbon   5 that amended it. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 23:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

It created the European Coal and Steel Community   5, European Economic Community   5 and Euratom   5!

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   03:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Iostn (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

A declaration that was fulcral to the creation of the European Coal and Steel Community   5, would put it on the same level as the Fourteen Points. It is more important than you think, 47 interwikis!

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   03:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Fourteen Points

edit

Inspired by a book that I can't remember by Kant, the Fourteen Points of Woodrow Wilson dictated the domestic and external policy of the United States and of many other countries! It is famous for proposing the creation of the League of Nations   4.

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   03:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. I think this is pretty important. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Hadn't heard of it myself but yeah it seems important enough. On a bit of a tangent, should Triple Entente and Triple Alliance (1882) be listed? J947edits 07:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Deutsche Mark

edit

The currency that Euro   4 was largely bassed on. It was the official currency of West Germany   5 and Germany   3

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   13:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. I'm not convinced any individual historic currencies are vital. Gold standard   5 or Special drawing rights   5 should be added, but not Deutsche mark. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Rumor and Gossip

edit

Two major forms of Communication   2.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. V5, sure. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Swap Fraktur  5 with Blackletter

edit

Fraktur is just one type of Blackletter typefaces. It is by far the most famous one, but the article also mentions that the term "Fraktur" is also used to refer to the entire Blackletter group of typefaces.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 19:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Film additions

edit

In the removal discussion for The Human Condition (film series), I noted that film/series seemed less vital than Harakiri, a film by the same director, which has a 100% ranking on Rotten Tomatoes and is the highest ranked film on Letterboxd. It's also in the TSPDT top 1000.

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nom. CopiousAmountofCannons (talk) 00:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Considered a landmark in animated film, and one that continues to have a long-lasting legacy.

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. I mentioned in the now-archived thread to remove Wall-E that my top candidate for replacing it was Fantasia (1940 film) but it didn't get much traction. Hopefully, there is more support this time around. Aurangzebra (talk) 18:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Disney animated films I feel are slightly underrepresented considering their enduring worldwide popularity, and I'd consider this (alongside Pinocchio) more vital than Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)   5.--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 19:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Absolutely. λ NegativeMP1 17:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Per nom. CopiousAmountofCannons (talk) 01:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hugely influential on the documentary film as a format, "It was the first feature-length documentary to achieve commercial success, proving the financial viability of the genre and inspiring many films to come".

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Proved that documentaries could make money and was among the first films chosen for preservation by Congress. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. I'm apt to oppose films that people who aren't extreme cinephiles typically haven't heard of. Also, I feel like, in general, it requires a much higher standard of notability to include documentaries on this list as documentaries are much less influential in the cultural zeitgeist than regular movies. If we are really looking to add another documentary, I would rather add Bowling for Columbine which has much more of a cultural legacy, is way more well-known, has won more awards (though this is less impressive when compared to a movie from 1922), and is regularly considered one of the greatest documentaries of all time. Aurangzebra (talk) 20:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I would support adding Bowling for Columbine as well. Iostn (talk) 23:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

"Open City is considered one of the most important and representative works of Italian neorealism   5, and an important stepping stone for Italian filmmaking as a whole."

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. --Thi (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. We already have a better, much more famous representative for Italian neorealism with Bicycle Thieves   4. We probably don't need 2. And even with the expanded quota, our film section is so small that we should probably only be listing unambiguous classics or widely-known films. It doesn't even have a Legacy section. Aurangzebra (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I am explicitly proposing films because I think the section is disproprtionately small compared to video games (which is at ~100), when films have been around for much longer (1890s vs 1970s) and have built up much more cultural influence over time. Besides, Bicycle Thieves is listed a tier above this already. Iostn (talk) 18:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I agree that films should have more representation especially when compared to video games (I have a track record of complaining about how many video game articles we have), I just don't think this is anywhere close to being one of the best candidates. Aurangzebra (talk) 18:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Maybe recent(ist), but this has already risen as one of the most highly-regarded films of the 21st century, and has had an impact on "conscious" trends in film in recent years.

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. We're over quota in Level 5. While we are still adding broadly relevant concepts like Voting   5, I can't support adding one-off films like this one. starship.paint 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
    VA5 is currently below quota, its only has 49,958 as of the latest update. Iostn (talk) 15:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    But Arts is over-quota at 3,322/3,300. Currently specific films are at 199, and customarily we had at the number of vital films at 200. I would support your suggestions, if paired with films to swap. Makkool (talk) 16:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I was actually personally in favour of a higher quota for films, given we had one of 105 for video games which is a much more recent medium and therefore one with less titles that are as culturally influential, but I can propose some other removals from Arts. Iostn (talk) 19:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Jumping into this quite late but I would support removing video games in favor of adding more movies. I think our massive list of video game articles reflects the demographics of VA5 voters as opposed to all Wikipedia users whereas movies are a more global phenomenon. Aurangzebra (talk) 06:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Iostn:, I stand corrected, I did not know about the recent update. Still, I agree with Makkool. starship.paint 08:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Discuss

One of the most important films in the history of Indian cinema, which is also the largest in the world in terms of number of films produced.

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. --Thi (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. As far as I'm aware, we don't list a single Indian movie. We definitely should have one and this is probably the best candidate since Satyajit Ray   4 has been highly influential in global cinema. Aurangzebra (talk) 20:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    There is The Apu Trilogy   4 at least.--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 20:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Oh completely missed that. As the most famous movie in that trilogy, I'll still support this proposal. Aurangzebra (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    And there's Sholay   5 and Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge   5 too. Makkool (talk) 20:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Arguably the biggest animated film of the 2000s, became a lasting cultural phenomenon and turned DreamWorks into one of the biggest animated film studios. Also note it being the first 21st century animated film in the National Film Registry.

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 15:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Very culturally influential, for better or worse.--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 18:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Undoubtedly important. λ NegativeMP1 04:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. All of our Western animated films are from Disney or Pixar. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

For the "art film" subsection, this is one of the most well-known non-narrative essay films of its kind, is highly-acclaimed and also went on to influence works such as Baraka (film). Also highly notable for its score by Philip Glass   4, from the music section; "The music has become so popular that the Philip Glass Ensemble has toured the world, playing the music for Koyaanisqatsi live in front of the movie screen".

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 15:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Another one of the most influential science fiction films of all time.

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 15:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Big landmark in the overseas influence of Japanese horror cinema, and can be considered a big part of the resurgence of Japanese pop cultural influence in the 1990s and early 2000s.

Support
  1. Nom Iostn (talk) 15:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Visual arts general article removals

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


An early form of comics without speech bubbles. A niche topic, with 300 or so page views in the last 30 days.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 01:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
  3. --LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 18:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 06:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


A specific technique used in making pottery. A short stub article on a niche topic, which isn't vital to understand the whole concept of pottery.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 01:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
  3. --LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 18:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 06:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


An important form in prehistoric art, but Ivory carving is a much more vital topic as a whole and we don't list it. Would possibly swap, or rather just remove.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 01:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 06:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Replacing a less notable form of painting with a well known art concept.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 06:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 12:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Replacing another specific technique of pottery with a popular form of art. Also more notable in terms of monthly page views.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 06:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support removal per above but not sure about the addition, 5 interwikis only.. starship.paint 12:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Replacing a minor form of art with another well known art concept.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 22:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Any painting depicting the human figure. Only four interwikis and low view count. Could this be too vague concept to be vital?

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 22:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Sand art and play   5 or move to Everyday life

edit

Sand art and playing with sand are in the same article. Sand art is not vital, but making sand castles could be. Should we remove it or move under Play (activity)   3?

Support
  1. Support remove as nom. Makkool (talk) 22:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Narcissus (mythology)

edit

Highly popular and prevelant caracther created by Ovid   4's Metamorphoses, a name that has become a byword for self-love.

Support
  1. As nominator.The Blue Rider   19:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per. nom Makkool (talk) 12:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. --Thi (talk) 14:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. --LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 07:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Emerging adulthood and early adulthood

edit

It’s a subtopic of young adulthood. Interstellarity (talk) 11:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 11:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion

Add Early childhood

edit

Important state of like between toddlerhood and middle childhood. Interstellarity (talk) 11:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 11:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion

Add Innuendo to Communication

edit

Figure of speech, one of the tropes, used for comedic or insulting effect. starship.paint 02:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 02:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. -TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Reinsurance

edit

A major part of the insurance industry. Place under Insurance.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Still hard to believe Warranty   5 wasn't even V5 a year ago. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 23:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Major branch of financial services with massive companies. Aszx5000 (talk) 19:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add economics subfields

edit

48 interwikis, high-importance in economics and business Wikiprojects. The ideas presented by the research in this subfield have been used by governments (see the article for nudge theory) and corporations and many famous VA5 economists such as Daniel Kahneman   5 and Richard Thaler   5 have won Nobel Prizes in Economics for their contributions to the field. Also in the public conscious due to being the subject of many chart-topping pop science books such as Thinking Fast and Slow.

Support
  1. As nominator. Aurangzebra (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nominator. The Blue Rider   11:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. per nom. starship.paint 03:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
  5. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 22:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Only 19 interwikis but a critical subfield of economics. It is the study of finding a way to structure an event such that the outcome optimizes a desired social choice function. This is applied to market design (such as spectrum auctions or student matching programs like the National Resident Matching Program), politics (with voting theory), and even computer networking. Maybe not that well-known outside economics but influential enough in everyday life to warrant a spot.

Support
  1. As nominator. Aurangzebra (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Massively multiplayer online game  5 and Online game  5

edit

Redundant, as we already list Multiplayer video game   5 and Massively multiplayer online role-playing game   5.

Support both
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose both
  1. Would much rather remove said articles they would be redundant to or History of online games   5. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Mixed
Discuss
  1. I personally would have chosen to remove {[VA link|Massively multiplayer online role-playing game}}, since that would have been covered enough in Massively multiplayer online game   5. λ NegativeMP1 18:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  1. I chose to keep MMORPG, because that is overwhelmingly the most common type of MMOG. We list World of Warcraft   5, but I don't think we have any vital non-rpg MMOGs. Makkool (talk) 18:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Swap Gedenkdienst  5 for Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh

edit

Gedenkdienst is a rather confusing article that can't seem to decide if its about Austria's Holocaust memorial organization or a specific phrase, but either way there isn't really anything here that seems to suggest its as important as say, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum   5, and the pageviews are very low for VA5 as well. Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh is one of the largest, oldest and most alarmingly influential nationalist paramiliatry organizations in the world that exerts a large degree of influence over Indian politics.

Support
  1. Iostn (talk) 21:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makkool (talk) 20:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Superpower, Great power, and Middle power to Politics under Political Science, or something similar.

edit

Superpower describes a state or supranational union that holds a dominant position characterized by the ability to exert influence or project power on a global scale. A great power is a sovereign state that is recognized as having the ability and expertise to exert its influence on a global scale. A Middle power is a state that is not a superpower or a great power, but still exerts influence and plays a significant role in international relations. These three concepts are used very often to describe countries in geopolitical discussions, which most of you are probably familiar with. All three pages are   class articles. Superpower has 1,075 daily average page views, Great power has 885 Daily average page views, and Middle power has 481. While page views aren't the only metric to use, this does show the pages do get some attention.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 18:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support

  1. As Nom GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 18:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support great power, superpower. The Blue Rider   18:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support great power, superpower per nom. starship.paint 07:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Support great power, superpower. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 02:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oppose

  1. Oppose middle power; would prefer to add regional power since it is a more commonly used terminology in International Relations. The Blue Rider   18:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Discuss

@The Blue Rider:, I know that page views are not the best metric for importance, but regional power has an average of 168 daily page views compared to the 481 for Middle power linked above. This made me think that Middle power was the more popular term. Do you have a source on this? Also, a regional power can include great powers and middle powers in my understanding, so the two terms are not synonyms. What defines a regional power will depend on the relative power of the region it is in. Therefore, this could be "both" situation rather then "either-or," and we could try to get both regional and middle power listed. Do you have a source for which one is "more commonly used" in international relations?GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

My source is my International Relations' bachelor's; from the literature I have read, regional power is used more often than middle power. Google Ngram agrees with me as well. The Blue Rider   12:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'll remember Google Ngram as a source for this! Thanks for responding! I have a minor in national security, and wrote a term paper on "Middle powers" back during undergrad. As one of the only geographers in the course, I was focused on the "super power", "great power", "middle power", and "Small powers." My career has taken me far from this area of study, so I'm not exactly an expert.
I would argue based on what I'm seeing now that the "powers" I listed are based on global influence, while "regional power" would be local geographic. A power like China, (Which is debatably a superpower, and obviously a great power), is more of a "regional power" in terms of military. Thus, a country can be both a middle power and regional power, or a middle power but not a major regional power, such as the situation with Canada where they are overshadowed in many ways by their neighbor to the south. I'm not really married to that opinion though. We may need to consider adding the page Power (international relations). GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 18:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Most academics argue that world is now multipolar, the United States is losing its status as the sole superpower, China and European Union are ascending to the ranking of superpower. That seems like a good suggestion, there are plenty of other important topics missing from International Relations: hard power, soft power, smart power, realism (international relations), Idealism in international relations, Constructivism (international relations), realpolitik, among many others. The Blue Rider   18:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • On the subject of middle powers, should we remove all countries from V3 that do not fall into at least that category? Is the DRC vital for more than just population? Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
    • I would not feel comfortable weighing in on that question one way or the other, that is quite the debate. Just clearly defining what countries are true "Middle Powers" is beyond the literature I'm aware of on the topic, which is admi. Nobody even agrees what the superpowers are, or the great powers (check the talk pages, even with sources people will fight tooth an nail over who they think should or should not be included). It could also be argued that a country is vital for more reasons then it's ability to influence geopolitics on the global stage, and that millions of people with a unique culture and government are "vital." On the DRC, the Wikipedia page notes that "The DRC is widely considered one of the world's richest countries in natural resources; its untapped deposits of raw minerals are estimated to be worth in excess of US$24 trillion. The DRC has 70% of the world's coltan, a third of its cobalt, more than 30% of its diamond reserves, and a tenth of its copper." I suspect most countries have stuff that jumps out like this that would make them "vital" to understanding geopolitics. I would likely set something like "The top 100 by population, top 100 by GDP, top 100 by land area, and all states with nuclear weapons can be included as "V3"" if I was going to have an actual rule for how to sort inclusion of countries. You could adjust the numbers if you want, but I bet that would get you slightly around 120 of the 195 countries. I don't have much of a strong opinion on this though.
    GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I would support a few more countries at V3, namely Iraq, Peru, Afghanistan, Morocco, and possibly Austria, but I'd prefer regions over some mid-sized countries, such as Scandinavia   4 instead of Sweden, definitely the Balkans   4 instead of Romania or Greece, Central America   4 instead of Guatemala, Central Asia   4 instead of Kazakhstan, etc. My main priority for V3 is adding more cities. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 22:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Remove Renaissance architecture in Central and Eastern Europe  5

edit

Sufficiently covered by Renaissance architecture   4. .

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 04:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Sparse article and 2 interwikis only. starship.paint (RUN) 03:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makkool (talk) 09:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove American Slavery As It Is  5

edit

Not a particularly influential abolitionist text.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 04:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nom., article has low page views.Makkool (talk) 09:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 22:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Actually, the article said that it influenced several works, including Uncle Tom's Cabin   4, continued having influence into the 21st century, and helped recruit people for the abolitionist movement. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Power (international relations), Hard power, and Soft power

edit

The influence and capability of a state in the international stage. Hard power and soft power are the two main ways of exerting power by states. Mentioned in #Add Superpower, Great power, and Middle power to Politics under Political Science, or something similar. above.

Support
  1. As nominator. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support hard power and soft power; the power article should already be sufficiently covered by these two. The Blue Rider   11:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support hard power and soft power per TBR. starship.paint (RUN) 08:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 22:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Unrestricted Warfare  5

edit

Why is this book in War and military? Someone might have added this because it was confused for Total war   5, which is already listed.

Support
  1. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Seems insignificant. The Blue Rider   11:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom Aurangzebra (talk) 02:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. per above. starship.paint 02:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
  5. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Joint product  5

edit

Economics concept, but short article with only 6 interwikis.

Support
  1. As nom. starship.paint 03:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 03:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Islamic calligraphy to Paper art

edit

History of more than 1000 years. Reduce systemic bias. 29 interwikis.

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 02:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. Rated High-importance in WP Islam and Typography. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 14:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makkool (talk) 18:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Chop Suey (Hopper)  5

edit

This only really seems to be listed for being the most expensive work by the artist, whereas his most well-known is the also-listed Nighthawks (Hopper)   5.

Support
  1. As nom. Iostn (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Swap for Chop suey. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makkool (talk) 18:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Yuri (genre)

edit

The counterpart to the recently added Yaoi   5 (doesn't display right since it was added two minutes ago), which depicts same-sex relationships between women instead of men.

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 21:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Iostn (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discuss

Add Shanghai Library

edit

Important library that's missing. May support swap with Boston Public Library which is nominated above. Interstellarity (talk) 00:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 00:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support swap with BPL Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support swap Iostn (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion
  1. I'd support a swap, but not a straight addition. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Changes to Philosophy and religion

edit

I want to add some mythological figures, but since this page over quota, let me nominate some articles for removal before I do that.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Stub. Only has three interwikis, not one of them is French.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Should be covered enough by Sacredness   4. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Same issues as above.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Repentance is not just limited to Christianity.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


We don't list the articles on how other religions view marriage.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Stub. Hebrew article isn't that much longer.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


We don't list the articles on the conversion process of other religions.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


We don't list other glossary articles.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Stub here. Stub on Arabic Wikipedia. Article outright states that it has no distinct doctrines from the other Sufi orders.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I think Wudu   5 is enough. We don't even list ritual purification.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

I'm just bringing this here because I can't think any other place to place this. I'm not moving Companions of the Prophet   5 as I did for Rashidun   5, The ten to whom Paradise was promised   5, Ahl al-Bayt   5, and Wives of Muhammad   5. Unlike the others, I feel like the definition of being a member of this group is too broad to be moved to people. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Yes, it's one of the four noble truths, but I got to be honest, I don't think it should be its own article. Only has 5 interwikis.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Stub. Has zero interwikis.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Mahdi (in Abrahamic mythological figures)

edit

Huge figure in Islamic eschatology.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Popular Celtic goddess. Possibly the inspiration for Morgan le Fay   5.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Brunhild   5 (to Germanic mythological figures)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Major Germanic figure and a major character in the Nibelungenlied   4 and Der Ring des Nibelungen   4.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Unlike the Twelve Olympians   5, the Titans   4, or even the Greek primordial deities   5, these aren't categories that the ancient Greeks used.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Final avatar for Vishnu   4. Naturally the central figure of Hindu eschatology.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Swap Mitra   5 for Mithra and Maitreya

edit

I would love to have the parent article of this guy, but his page is a borderline disambiguation one. Swap him out with the two most important forms of this deity. (Mithra is the one that the Mithraists worship, while Maitreya is a central figure in Buddhist eschatology.)

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

For Maitreya, place him under Buddhist figures. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add Freyr (in Norse mythological figures)

edit

Major god. If we have Týr   5, then surely we can have him.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Hel (mythological being) (in Norse mythological figures)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Ruler of one of the Norses afterlife. Daughter of Loki   5 and sister of Fenrir   5 and Jörmungandr   5. Played a big role in the attempted resurrection of Baldr   5.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


We already have seven types of angels on here, plus three specific archangels. We don't need the theological views on angels from the three main Abrahamic religions.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. per nom-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Chiron (under legendary creatures)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


One of the most well-known centaurs.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


We already have Lucifer   5 on here, which is strictly a Christian thing. Swap him out with Iblis, the Islamic version of Satan.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Pure land (under mythical locations)

edit

Central end goal of followers of Pure Land Buddhism   5.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Shangri-La is probably the better known of the two, but it's a fictional location, not a mythical one. Let's swap it out for what it is probably its inspiration.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Maybe we should have a separate section for fictional locations? (including Middle-Earth and others?) Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Is it worth it though? This and arguably Utopia   4 (although that's more a generic type of setting) are the only fictional locations we have. Also, if we decide to have a fictional location section, it's going have to be put in the arts section. SailorGardevoir (talk) 18:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Imperial Regalia of Japan (under mythical objects)

edit

These items played a major role in getting Amaterasu   4 out of that cave. (I know the Japanese Imperial House claims that these are actual objects they possess.)

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Demiurge (under Abrahamic figures)

edit

Major figure in Gnosticism. Created the universe, but he's not the actual God and he sucks.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 10:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Swap Baron Samedi   5 with Lwa (not OP)

edit

Lwa is the category of deities/spirits in Vodou that includes Baron Samedi. BS was randomly added by me years ago. I was familiar with the name from some movie, but I'm not an expert to know if it's vital enough to keep on the list as an example of lwa.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support addition. SailorGardevoir (talk) 18:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Oppose removal. Baron Samedi is famous enough to keep on here. SailorGardevoir (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Remove all individual Sefirot (not OP)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


All 10 under Sefirot   5. Too obscure and esoteric topic, and they take slots from other articles. (Also added by me once)

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 12:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per above. starship.paint 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 18:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This is a very odd inclusion to the legendary creatures section. While almost every other entries has double digit interwikis, this thing only has six.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint (RUN) 08:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. Makkool (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Very popular ghost legend from Mexico. (Obviously place it under Ghost   4, but not White Lady   5; most White Lady ghosts aren't malicious as her.)

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 01:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Not so sure, it's rated Low or Mid-importance in all of its Wikiprojects. (So is White Lady, by the way) I would rather support the most famous ghost legends like Flying Dutchman   5, rather than local ones from one country. Makkool (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I can support that, but that's more of a ship though. (Although we can put it under locations/items I guess.) SailorGardevoir (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Flying Dutchman (under mythical objects)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Very, very popular maritime ghost legend. Even appeared on SpongeBob SquarePants   5. Placing it under objects since it's a ship that most people don't board.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Is a ghost ship a ghost or a ship? Mythical objects is fine, if it feels weird to list it with mythical creatures. Makkool (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 15:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Basically the same blood-sucking creature (floating female head plus her internal organs) except this Thai version has more interwikis (15) than her Malay counterpart we're listing right now (8).

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support per higher count of interwikis (and pageviews). The Indonesian version Leyak is also quite famous, but is still overshadowed by Krasue. Makkool (talk) 16:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per above. Plus I have nominated to add the Malay Kuntilanak below. starship.paint (RUN) 15:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Remove Elyon   5

edit

Only has 8 interwikis.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 01:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 15:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Only has 6 interwikis.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 01:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Not a major god. starship.paint 14:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I hate to remove the goto example of angels not just being humans with wings, but the former only has 9 interwikis while every version of the latter is short.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 15:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Kukulkan and Chaac (under Native American figures)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


We don't have anyone from the Mayan pantheon, which is pretty glaring since the Maya are one of the three well-known pre-Columbian civilizations.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 15:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
  1. Maybe we could list also the umbrella term Feathered Serpent? And place both Kukulkan and Quetzalcoatl under it? Makkool (talk) 16:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
    That only has 9 interwikis though. SailorGardevoir (talk) 04:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Pazuzu (under demons in legendary creatures)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Arguably the most well known demon in Mesopotamian mythology. Appeared in The Exorcist   5.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 13:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Nāga (under dragons? in legendary creatures)

edit

Well known creature. Popular throughout South Asia and Southeast Asia. I'm kind of shocked that Penanggalan and to a lesser extent Rakshasa   5 got picked over this. (Regarding its potential placement, I'm not sure if they should be placed under dragons or just be a separate entry. The original Indian are just half-snake, half-human beings, but it does seem like the Southeastern versions of the Nāga have acquired a lot dragon-like traits.)

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Bake-danuki (under yokai in legendary creature)

edit

The other popular animal yokai.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. As vital as Kitsune   5. Makes an appearance in Super Mario Bros 3 too. Makkool (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Wild Hunt (under ghosts in legendary creatures?)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This is more of a motif, so I'm not sure listing this as a type of ghost is the right call. What I do think is that it's a pretty popular… whatever this is throughout Europe.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 05:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Major concept in comparative mythology. Maybe list in Mythology:General, when it's not an individual ghost? Makkool (talk) 11:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
    That sounds like a good place. SailorGardevoir (talk) 04:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 15:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Interesting entry, but only has 8 interwikis.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 04:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 11:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 15:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Kuntilanak (under ghost in legendary creatures)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


16 interwikis. Spirit of three Southeast Asian countries. Goes against systemic bias. Plus we are swapping out Penanggalan above from these countries, so good to restore some representation. starship.paint 14:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 21:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makkool (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


42 interwikis. Aztec god of rain, thunder and fertility. Many sacrifices were made to him. starship.paint 15:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 15:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk) 21:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makkool (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Mokele-mbembe (under cryptids)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Let's give Sub-Saharan Africa some representation. Has 35 interwikis, decent-sized, rated top-importance on WikiProject Cryptozoology. (Although it does come from numerous Bantu mythologies, the fact that it is frequently seen a some sort of sauropod pushes it over to the crpytid side.)

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 13:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. Makkool (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add Human sacrifice (under sacrifice)

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I just realized we don't have this article on here.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 05:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 13:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. Makkool (talk) 17:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Three. This thing only has three interwikis.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Rougarou   5 (potential swap for Skin-walker?)

edit

Only seven interwikis. I guess we can swap it out for skin-walker, but the fact that the Navajo by in large refuse to talk about this creature to outsiders makes it very hard for me to see its article being improved. (Also it's going to have to be listed separately, as it's a type of witch.)

Support
  1. Removal only for now. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Remove only Makkool (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support removal. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Tabletop game

edit

Parent topic to Board game and Card game. Interstellarity (talk) 23:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 23:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom., we need the parent topic too Makkool (talk) 18:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion

Add Warner Bros. and Paramount Pictures

edit

We recently listed Namco   5 and Sega   5 as vital articles, and while those listings are definitely warranted, that places video games as having equal representation in Film, television, video game, and music production as film which are far more widespread and long-lasting than video games. To compensate, I propose the addition of the two American Major film studios that aren't already listed: Warner Bros. and Paramount Pictures.

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 06:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. --LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 11:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support both as the guy who tried nominating Paramount Pictures.SailorGardevoir (talk) 08:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. per nom. starship.paint 05:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
  5. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 12:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discuss

Putting a note here I just now noticed the earlier nomination for Paramount Pictures to get added. Not going to change this since its got more than Paramount Pictures, though. λ NegativeMP1 18:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Closed and archived that. starship.paint 05:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Changes to Communication

edit

Common Nonverbal communication   4. 37 interwikis. starship.paint 14:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. per nom. λ NegativeMP1 18:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 19:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Common Nonverbal communication   4. 6 interwikis. starship.paint 14:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. per nom. λ NegativeMP1 18:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Not a vital concept, more like a dictionary entry. The Blue Rider   23:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per The Blue Rider, plus I think listing Cheerleading   5 adequately covers the concept as applied to real life. feminist🩸 (talk) 16:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Common Nonverbal communication   4. 12 interwikis. starship.paint 14:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. per nom. λ NegativeMP1 18:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 19:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Not that common, mainly confined to a couple of places like sports. The Blue Rider   23:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

6 interwikis only. We already have Science communication   5 with 19 interwikis. starship.paint 14:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. per nom. λ NegativeMP1 18:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 19:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Common Nonverbal communication   4. 9 interwikis. starship.paint 14:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. per nom. λ NegativeMP1 18:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 19:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. It might be somewhat common but is the concept of frowning that encyclopedical to warrant vital status? I don't think so. The Blue Rider   23:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Common Nonverbal communication   4. 21 interwikis. starship.paint 14:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. per nom. λ NegativeMP1 18:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 19:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Common Nonverbal communication   4. 31 interwikis. starship.paint 14:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. per nom. λ NegativeMP1 18:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 19:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Cash flow

edit

A very important concept in accounting and finance. Place under Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences/Politics and economics#Accounting. It doesn't make sense for us to list Cash flow statement   5 but not Cash flow.

Support
  1. As nominator. feminist🩸 (talk) 02:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Gold panning  5

edit

A gold extraction technique among many.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 07:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint 15:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose
  1. Major influence in pop culture, which our article neglects to mention. There are plenty of other things we can remove first. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss
  1. Why is this being proposed? Iostn (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Too niche. The politics and economics section is above quota, yet there are still some fairly basic proposals (see mine below). Tabu Makiadi (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Swap Cost-of-production theory of value  5 with Value (economics)

edit

The former derives from the Labour theory of value, a more foundational theory, employed in Classical economics   5 and Political economy   5, not to mention in Marxism   4. The latter provides an overview of theories of value.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 07:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 15:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Project

edit

An essential concept in the task management of organizations. The Vital Articles project is an example of this.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 07:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 15:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. Wikipedia itself is one big project. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Bōsōzoku  5

edit

A stretch to list them under organized crime. We could move them to subcultures but their numbers have dwindled in past decades.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 07:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 07:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 22:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. I don't think being smaller numbers in than they used to be is necessarily a good reason for removal. Iostn (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add some traditional musical instruments

edit

30 interwikis. A 3,000+ year old Chinese instrument that is the oldest surviving Zither   5. One of the UNESCO Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity. Played by Confucius   3, Emperor Huizong of Song   5, and others. Reduces systemic bias. starship.paint 14:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. per nom. Makkool (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Iostn (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Also 30 interwikis, also a Chinese Zither   5. The guzheng is the most popular traditional instrument in China. It has more than 2,500 years of history, and still remains the most-learned traditional instrument in Chinese families. The guzheng can be considered the equivalent of the piano in Western music, said Luo Xiaoci, director of Shanghai Chinese Orchestra. Reduces systemic bias. starship.paint 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Support
  1. as nom. starship.paint 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. per nom. Makkool (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Iostn (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Another instrument to reduce systemic bias. Used prominently in Persian, Turkish, Jewish and Arabic music. According to the article, "The ney has been played continually for 4,500–5,000 years, dating back to ancient Egypt, making it one of the oldest musical instruments still in use." Has 28 interwikis.

Support
  1. as nom. Makkool (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint 07:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. Iostn (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Competition climbing

edit

Competition climbing is now a full Olympic sport and we have lots of BLPs that are Category:Competition climbers including other sub-articles for competition climbing. Bouldering   5 is one of the three disciplines of competition climbing, and is already VA5. Sport climbing   5 is another one of the three disciplines of competition climbing, and is also VA5. We should probably also have Speed climbing, the third discipline of competition climbing, at VA5 as well, but let us try to get competition climbing at VA5 first. Aszx5000 (talk) 21:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. as nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 21:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. (a necessary umbrella term) Makkool (talk) 11:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Indigenous education

edit

Surprised this hasn't already been made vital. What is supposed to be an article regarding a worldwide view of education related to indigenous topics, is in dire need of improvement and recognition; the topic is becoming increasingly relevant as indigenous history becomes more widely taught.

Support
  1. as nom. B3251 (talk) 01:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. I think this is a rare case where a subject being "niche" is why it should be listed. Many people didn't teach it (if not fought to destroy the mere concept of people learning about those people) for centuries and that's why it's "niche", which isn't a good thing. The subject is objectively important enough for V5. λ NegativeMP1 13:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Whether or not it is a bad thing being niche, it doesn't invalidate that it has close to zero impact on society. The Blue Rider   13:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    The teaching of indigenous history/topics/culture absolutely has an impact on society as it is essential to the preservation of knowledge about [[Indigenous peoples]] worldwide. Retaining the understanding of human culture and history throughout most of the world prior to colonization is one of the largest reasons why we know about human culture in parts of the world that eventually were colonized today. Indigenous topics are quite underrepresented in Vital Articles. B3251(talk) 20:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Niche type of education. The Blue Rider   01:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Share (finance)

edit

One of the most essential concepts of financial markets. The concepts of Shareholder   5 and Shareholder activism   5 derive from it.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 23:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. starship.paint. 02:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Public finance

edit

The management of government revenue, expenditures, and debt is a core area of government. Despite its name, this should squarely go into the State structure and administration section.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nom. In many large countries, public finance is almost half the economy. Aszx5000 (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Business administration

edit

The article could use some work but this is one of the most popular college majors globally. Paraphrasing from the Master of Business Administration   5 article, areas of business administration include accounting, applied statistics, human resources, business communication, business ethics, business law, strategic management, business strategy, finance, managerial economics, management, entrepreneurship, marketing, supply-chain management, and operations management in a manner most relevant to management analysis and strategy.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Coup d’etat

edit

We list a lot of coups in the history section (and several have occurred in recent years). Coups can significantly impact political stability, governance, human rights, and, obviously, democracy.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Wow, super glaring omission. This is V4 stuff. The Blue Rider   21:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per The Blue Rider, this might be a contender for the most crucial concept we don't list. This could probably be nominated for V4 if it passes here. λ NegativeMP1 21:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. --LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 23:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Strong support per above, most certainly V4 as well. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 00:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6. Should certainly be VA4. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Election fraud

edit

A common feature of authoritarian regimes. Even accusations of fraud can have wide-ranging political, social, and legal effects.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. starship.paint. 02:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. As an American, I can confirm the second sentence of the nomination. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Swap Hoarding  5 with Hoarding disorder

edit

The disorder is much more vital than the general behavior. Place to health and fitness section with other mental disorders. Makkool (talk) 11:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 11:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. The Blue Rider   04:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Slalom skateboarding  5 and Street luge  5

edit

Skateboarding   4 has five subsections. That's a bit too much in my opinion. Skateboarding should have only three subsection: vert, freestyle, and street. They're all different, but three distinct styles that are the most common in skateboarding.

Slalom skateboarding isn't that vital, in fact it gets the lowest page views from these five. I don't think this is a controversial removal. It's definitely known and has some competitions but it didn't really define one of the style of skateboarding (it was one of the first competitions that was made for skateboarding, but didn't grow much after that). Street luge is that one fun thing you want to do as a kid and pray your fingers don't get chopped from the wheels of your skateboard. Other than being dangerous, it didn't really influence skateboarding or is vital at all. It did have some time of being a sport for X Games   5, but it was removed after some time.

Support
  1. per nom. 49p (talk) 07:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. Makkool (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add International Committee of the Red Cross

edit

A part of International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement   3. The ICRC is a humanitarian organization with a significant impact to human rights globally and a three-time Nobel prize laureate. The oldest and most honored organization in the Red Cross.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 19:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Interstellarity (talk) 12:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Old Nubian

edit

Old Nubian is the oldest written non-Afroasiatic african language and is the most famous member of the Nubian languages. Adding another language like this would increase the number of language families represented in the vital article list which in my opinion is something valueable. The kingdom of Makuria (in which Old Nubian was spoken) is also already a level 5 article, so I don't see any historical reason why this isn't significant enough. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 02:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Nom
  2. Per nom. Very interesting topic, we could list a few more under-represented historical languages. Makkool (talk) 06:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 13:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Per nom. Aszx5000 (talk) 14:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)spReply
Oppose
Discuss

@ZKevinTheCat: Please add the customary support as nominator vote on future vital nominations. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 13:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Economic systems

edit

As an umbrella term for Market economy   5 (and possibly others).

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 00:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Historically used economic system in the socialist states. To be paired with Market economy   5.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 00:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Blending of elements from planned and market economies. In use today in many parts of the world, like the Nordic model or China's socialist market economy.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per nominator. Arguably every country can be classified as such. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 00:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Achievement (video games)  5

edit

Yes, this is a pretty widespread video game subject, but its also fringe enough to fall on the lines of trivia. Is the idea of an achievement necessary to an encyclopedic definition of video games?

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 20:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 11:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discuss

Remove First-person (video games)  5

edit

Doesn't seem necessary when we list the more broad Virtual camera system   5.

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 20:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 11:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discuss

Add Seven Nation Army

edit

This song was added without consensus by @TDKR Chicago 101:, before obviously being reverted, so I'm giving it a fair discussion. In my opinion, while this is a semi-important work, I'm not sure if it's really "vital" worthy, and there's songs/albums I'd list before it (I still think one Taylor Swift   4 album and Never Gonna Give You Up could be added), and I'm only creating this discussion as to give the proposal a fair chance.

Support
Oppose
  1. Not in Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs of All Time Makkool (talk) 15:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
It technically is, granted it's at 36th. λ NegativeMP1 16:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ah, okay. I was going by a very cursory search. Didn't try to mislead anyone else, just tried to convince myself for my intuition to not include this. #36 is still a low enough to keep opposing. Makkool (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral
  1. As the nom. λ NegativeMP1 12:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


Discuss

Various Culture removals

edit

Remove Bokmål   5 and Nynorsk   5

edit

Official written standards of the Norwegian language. Norwegian is only V5, spoken by 4-5 million people, and the general article explains both of them in detail.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Unlike other Austronesian languages, this one is entirely concentrated in the Island of Nauru. By far the least spoken language from this group we list. It has less than 10,000 speakers.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Sparse article. I could wager this type of education is on the decline as countries increasingly have a larger pool of people who learn English through media, school, etc.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Iostn (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Minor areas/concepts in journalism and media. Low pageviews and interwikis suggest these are not frequently used.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Fyi we also list Alternative media   5 which covers similar ground to radical media Iostn (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Long-running, but frankly these shows appear to be more or less forgotten, at least compared to the others we list.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Trade show for the TV industry. The article does not assert much vitality. 2 intewikis

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Iostn (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

It’s proven a little hard to reduce the television section, even though it’s been voiced that we have too many shows, so this is my only proposal here. We already have CSI: Crime Scene Investigation   5, which spawned the franchise.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

I suppose it’s not impossible to turn these into comprehensive articles, but I agree that most list articles are too informal for a VA.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Iostn (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Possibly included because the article states its “the fourth most widely circulated magazine in the United States”. Nowadays it’s the fifth, and magazines 2-4 don’t even have articles, let alone are VAs.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Iostn (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

This one stood out for me because it’s the only “symbolism of x” we have. Too sparse for a VA.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

There are meaningful differences between them, but two slots are excessive. We list only six individual labor unions in the politics and economics section, though I would agree we should have more.

Support
  1. As nominator. Tabu Makiadi (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makes sense. QuicoleJR (talk) 11:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
  1. Two may seem excessive, but afaict they were never a single organization and the umbrella article as such is sparse. In any case, it should be moved with the other labour unions.

Remove Clavier-Übung III  5

edit

We got a lot of Bach on here. I think we can get rid of one or two works Like this one, which only has two interwikis.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. λ NegativeMP1 04:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Makkool (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
  1. Not entirely related to the nomination, but why do we use "X should be removed because it only has Y interwikis!" as a removal rationale? I see the reason why we use it, since it theoretically suggests a lack of worldwide influence, but it also seems to have some overlap with the fact that, if I recall correctly, redlinks as vital articles is technically allowed. That rules existence seems to directly contradict these types of rationales by implying a subject can be important regardless of whether or not a Wikipedia has it. λ NegativeMP1 02:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I think that rule should probably be removed. SailorGardevoir (talk) 04:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add Fuck tha Police (potential swap with Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang  5)

edit

We have three hip-hop songs: Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang   5, The Message (Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five song)   5, and Rapper's Delight   5. I think we can add one more. Fuck tha Police is probably one of the most controversial hip-hop songs, with it getting a letter from the FBI and extensive media attention. The article definitely needs some work, but I think the song is important enough to be added and has a lasting legacy. We can swap with Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang   5 if necessary.

Support
  1. Support + Swap per nom 49p (talk) 01:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support add Makkool (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support add, don't think a swap is necessary. I think more genre diversity should be welcomed. λ NegativeMP1 17:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Support addition. Will also support a swap with Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang if needed. I do think that this is a case of a track being just as vital as its parent album. SailorGardevoir (talk) 07:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Other than the name being famous and the controversy, I think Straight Outta Compton as a whole is probably further up there. If you want to swap Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang   5) with an individual song, I think the best pick may be Gangsta's Paradise. Iostn (talk) 12:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I don't think Gangsta's Paradise would be a good swap. The song is just a one-hit wonder (we don't even list Coolio as vital). The song being best-selling does add some merit to be vital. I don't think it'll be good enough for a swap, but could be added (weak support from me).
    If we want to swap, maybe we could do Fight the Power (Public Enemy song). It's not as big as Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang or Fuck the Police, but it has a bunch of accolades (#2 on Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs of All Time is a big one). 49p (talk) 15:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add Red (Taylor Swift album)

edit

When I nominated 1989 for V5 status (which I withdrew after it got no responses after a week), I stated that if a Taylor Swift   4 album were to be added, it had to be either that one or Red. I think that nearly all subjects at Vital 4 should have at least one subtopic at Vital 5, and that includes Taylor. So I'll give nominating this one a shot.

Backstory aside, this album received equal or higher critical acclaim than 1989, and appeared on several "best albums of the 2010's" lists with higher average placements than 1989 (its also been considered one of the most important albums of the decade). Out of her original six albums, Red has the highest rating on Metacritic, and her 2021 re-recording of the album is her highest rated work overall (91/100). It's her highest placed album on Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time at 99 (for context, 1989 was 383). It's also her first album with songs that reached #1 on charts and is believed to have inspired a generation of indie artists. I'd say this is right on the mark for a V5 album, maybe even more than 1989?

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 05:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. 49p (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Weak support for now; we don't list enough entries under "pop" relative to "rock" imo Iostn (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Too recent. We lack many albums from female artist that have "greatest album of all time" status, like Hounds of Love. Makkool (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    For the record, I'd support the addition of those as well if one were to make the proposals. λ NegativeMP1 17:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral
Discuss

Add Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty

edit

I get we already list Metal Gear   5 and Metal Gear Solid (1998 video game)   5, but Sons of Liberty is a league of its own for completely different reasons than those two. It completely changed the ways video games told stories, and it did so through political themes that went on to make it possibly the most analyzed video game in history (and one look at the themes and analysis section will prove that). These themes especially gained prominence in the 2010s and 2020s, since this game basically predicted them and is still considered a politically relevant game (so, to a certain extent, RECENTISM doesn't apply here). It is believed to have heavily influenced the vital BioShock   5 and Portal (video game)   5, and is considered a reason the PlayStation 2   5 became the best selling video game console of all time. It was even included as part of the final exhibition for The Art of Video Games, so while the article doesn't specifically state it is, this game could be considered a representation on this list for video games as an art form. I'd say this is a more influential video game than the aforementioned BioShock and Portal, and is absolutely worthy of V5.

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 05:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Definitely has a lot of influence in videogames and even the real world. 49p (talk) 01:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Swap Rogue (video game)   5 for this. Kevinishere15 (talk) 21:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Makkool (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Could you elaborate further on your issues with this proposal and the one above? λ NegativeMP1 14:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I don't doubt your justifications for how this is an important video game, but still I would be wary of adding a sequel video game. Maybe as a swap with some other video game I could reconsider. Also, I would choose some other example of an art video game that's not a franchise title. Makkool (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I'm not really sure if there's any option that'd be a better one than this, though if an alternate one was proposed I'd probably support it. λ NegativeMP1 17:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Very influential, but the bar for it to be listed seperately is very high when we already list Metal Gear and MGS and I don't think it quite meets that. Iostn (talk) 12:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. I'm extremely averse to having video game subentries, because A) they overlap with the parent franchise and I generally prefer breadth over depth (for example, maybe we should add Fate/stay night because we have no Visual novel   5 listed yet), and B) I'm afraid of a slippery slope and I think the existing subentries have already set a bad precedent.--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 07:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral
Discuss

Political ideologies cleanup

edit

This doesn't even really refer to an ideology as much as it is simply a phrase used to refer to the practices of large companies, or a state where large companies exist under capitalism - which is just capitalism, most of the time.

Support
  1. Nom. Iostn (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 14:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

A weirdly niche and specific concept to list at VA5, definitely not one of the fundamental political ideologies to list here.

Support
  1. Nom. Iostn (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 14:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Very similar to Social conservatism   5, which is also listed here and is a more commonly-used term.

Support
  1. Nom. Iostn (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 14:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


More of a derogatory term for Economic liberalism   5 or Neoliberalism   5 than a distinct ideology.

Support
  1. Nom. Iostn (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Alas, very influential as a political phenomenon, both historically and currently, across the world.

Support
  1. Nom. Iostn (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. λ NegativeMP1 06:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Overlaps with Secession   5, but the beliefs driving it are also very important to discuss in their own right

Support
  1. Nom. Iostn (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Makkool (talk) 14:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Non-theism cleanup

edit

We don't list articles on secularism in other countries.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

We don't list articles on the separation of church and state in other countries.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Naming ceremony covers both religious and secular types.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

A niche and specific concept to list at VA5, plus it's covered by Coming of age   5.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Roguelike  5

edit

Look, I understand that this is a decently popular sub-genre of Role-playing video games, but this is the kind of video game sub-genre that feels too specific and unimportant for vitality. It is not a core video game genre.

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 23:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. The core concepts (permadeath and procedural generation) have spread beyond RPGs, the article covers also the wider "roguelite" concept.--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 08:08, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Per above. If we think that we need to cut one more video game article, I would choose Rogue (video game)   5 over this. Makkool (talk) 18:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. I would rather cut Rogue than the genre it created. Also, per LaukkuTheGreit. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Keep this and swap Rogue for MGS2 as I said above. Kevinishere15 (talk) 19:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral
Discuss

Add A Song of Ice and Fire

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The original novels that Game of Thrones   5 TV show is based on. We don't list any fantasy books for 21st century fiction and this is an obvious candidate to cover the absence.

Support
  1. As nom. Makkool (talk) 18:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Seems like a very obvious pick for vitality. λ NegativeMP1 20:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Absolutely, surprised it wasn't already on the list. Kevinishere15 (talk) 21:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. There's a problem if Harry Potter is the latest. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 02:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    ASOIAF is older than Harry Potter. Kevinishere15 (talk) 02:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Actually, there's His Dark Materials   5 too. But no non-YA fantasy. Makkool (talk) 11:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discuss
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Swap World Trade Center (1973–2001) for World Trade Center site

edit

I think the site in general is more vital than the twin towers themselves. Interstellarity (talk) 19:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 19:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. λ NegativeMP1 03:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Oppose removal, the twin towers were absolutely vital for their architecture. Makkool (talk) 09:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. What? Are you saying that the World Trade Center which had a massive impact on the foreign and domestic policy of the USA isn't vital but instead the plot of land is?! The Blue Rider   16:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral
Discussion
  1. Where do you think this article about the site would be placed? If it's about a plot of land in New York, it can't be in architecture with other buildings. Makkool (talk) 09:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Remove Galaga  5

edit

There was some indication to remove this instead of Asteroids (video game)   5 in an earlier proposal of mine. With that and Space Invaders   5 already listed, I think arcade-era shooters may be slightly overrepresented. Galaga's contributions/influence seem iterative rather than revolutionary; it's acclaimed, yes, but we've already removed games for mere acclaim (like the more famous Planescape: Torment and Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (video game)). It has references in pop culture, but that either doesn't convince me it deserves to be listed ahead of the likes of Prince of Persia, Diablo (series), Fate/stay night, Ace Attorney...

Support
  1. As nom.--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 10:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per nom. Makkool (talk) 11:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Weak support, I would oppose if the company Namco   5 wasn't vital, but since it is, I guess their influence is fairly well covered here. Pac-Man   5 is definitely vital, though. λ NegativeMP1 17:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Speaking of Pac-Man, it would be my first pick if another video game or franchise was listed at V4. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. I would say this is among the least important games we haven't listed yet. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Remove Army men  5

edit

Has few interwikis (only 8) and lacks the historicity or ubiquity of Toy soldier, which is unlisted pbp 17:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. pbp 17:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. λ NegativeMP1 17:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support swap with the more general Toy soldier. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 19:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Support swap with toy soldier or Tin soldier. Makkool (talk) 05:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

Add Mingrelians

edit

Ethnic group and language of the Caucuses, pop ~400,000

Support
  1. pbp 18:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion
  1. Could you explain more why you would consider it a vital article? We are over-quota in the Culture section, so I would support a swap instead of a straight add. Makassar people has the lowest view-count of all peoples we list, which could be one contender. Makkool (talk) 05:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add Cross Road Blues

edit

This should have been the one that I nominated rather than King of the Delta Blues Singers. This song plays a huge part in the "Robert Johnson   4 selling his soul to the Devil" mythos. Probably the most famous Delta blues song, got twelve interwikis, and got covered by Eric Clapton   5.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 07:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support add Makkool (talk) 08:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support add. λ NegativeMP1 16:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Stayin' Alive

edit

I get that we already have Saturday Night Fever (soundtrack)   5, but this is easily the first disco song most people will name.

Support
  1. SailorGardevoir (talk) 07:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support swap with Saturday Night Fever (soundtrack)   5. The song is far more vital than the soundtrack album. Makkool (talk) 08:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I have to disagree with the idea of swapping this out with the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack. The soundtrack is one of the best-selling albums of all time (we're talking an estimate of 40 million units worldwide), and both it and the film are responsible for bringing disco to the mainstream. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    We also list Saturday Night Fever   5 the movie. And three articles for any cultural work is too much in my opinion. I still think the soundtrack album is the least vital for these three. Makkool (talk) 11:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support add, no opinion on swapping. λ NegativeMP1 16:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Quinceañera

edit

A long lasting, widespread tradition in families from Spanish speaking countries and regions that seems to be getting more popular each year. Seems to be a fair choice for V5. Would go in "Festivals, holidays, and observances."

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 18:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discussion

Remove WKRP in Cincinnati  5

edit

We have a lot of American TV shows, but it was extremely difficult to find one to remove. I ended up settling on this one. It only won two awards, had little influence on pop culture, and it only has seven interwikis. It seems to only be on the list due to high ratings received during its original run. This spot would be much better used by a show like Stargate, which is much more popular and influential, or a show like Soul Train which had a lasting impact on something.

Support
  1. As nom. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Note: I would be fine with a swap with Soul Train here, and I nominated Stargate below. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support per nom. Would support a swap with Soul Train too. Makkool (talk) 14:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Swap with Soul Train. SailorGardevoir (talk) 21:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discuss

Add Stargate

edit

The show that started the franchise was proposed by Piotrus a while back, but was unsuccessful. However, I think we should revisit adding the franchise. Not including this franchise on the list with many of the things we do list is a major oversight. Three shows in the franchise have an awards list separate from the main article, the franchise injected a billion dollars into the British Columbian economy (not every day a media franchise has a major economic impact), and we even have a separate article on the Stargate fandom! 34 interwikis with the first film having 46 and SG-1 having 48, rated High-Importance by WikiProject Television, WikiProject Media Franchises, and WikiProject Science Fiction.

Support
  1. As nom. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discuss

Swap: Remove The Legend of Zelda (video game)  5, add Stardew Valley

edit

I foresee some opposition here, so let me explain.

First, removing the original Zelda. While it is pretty popular, I'm not sure if Zelda warrants three subentries. Of the three, The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time   5 is the one that I would cut last. The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild   5 arguably has had enough of an impact on the games that have come out since, including the likes of Genshin Impact and Elden Ring, to stay on the list. That leaves the original, which I feel can have its impact mostly covered by the series article. It helped create the Action role-playing game   5 subgenre, but the rest of the game's impact mostly boils down to starting the series, which can be covered by the series. Besides, we need less subentries.

Now for the addition. I do not believe we currently include any farming simulators, and non-racing simulators in generally are mostly covered by just The Sims   5. We also have only Minecraft   5 for the Indie game   5 scene, and Minecraft barely counts anymore after the Microsoft purchase. Stardew Valley fits in both, and is also one of the best-selling video games of all time, as well as being considered one of the greatest. The game brought farming simulators from the minor, forgotten subgenre it was before to the indie behemoth it is today.

In summary, both games had a major impact on their genre, and both games are considered among the greatest, but Zelda is one of four listings for the series while Stardew Valley sold many more copies and adds more variety to the list. If you only support the addition or the removal, that is fine, but I think both would be good changes to the list.

Support
  1. As nom. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Noting for the record that I oppose removing Breath of the Wild since it had more of an impact than just starting the Zelda series. If there is not a consensus to remove the first Zelda, I would be fine with a straight add. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I'd like to point out that Zelda 1986 had a larger impact than just starting the franchise. It promoted non-linear gameplay and using the fantasy genre in Japanese console games. The article has an extensive "Legacy" section to indicate this. BotW is indeed innovative, but it's only a 7 years old game, so too recent. Makkool (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I'll go neutral on the Zelda removal for now, although I still think we should keep BOTW. What are your thoughts on the addition? QuicoleJR (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I wouldn't oppose it. I'm a bit sceptical, if it will pass. We recently voted to remove Undertale, which is also a recent indie game that's critically and commercially successful. Makkool (talk) 20:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support removal, currently neutral on addition (I'm wondering whether it'd be better to re-add Touhou Project to cover indie games, from a recentism perspective?)--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 18:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Touhou Project doesn't really have anything going for it besides being really popular for some time, so I'm not sure whether it could make the list. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Weak support addition, but unsure if it would be second to Minecraft in indie games. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 12:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. cut Breath of the Wild instead, neutral on add Makkool (talk) 18:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Same opinion as makkool· Kevinishere15 (talk) 19:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. I actually do think LoZ deserves to have three franchises. Neutral regarding SV. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Mixed
Neutral
Discuss
  1. I would add FNAF to represent indie games due to its cultural impact, but it recently failed and could be considered recentism. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 20:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    The main reason I picked Stardew Valley is because it had more than just cultural impact. Most other options did not have the impact on the gaming industry that Stardew Valley did. It also has the bonus of being one of the best-selling games of all time and one of the greatest. Most other options for indie game listings, like FNaF, are just really popular, which doesn't cut it. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    FNAF has had little to no actual impact on the indie game scene beyond a cult following and being a successful franchise. There's very few indie games I feel like are worthy of V5, though Stardew might be one of them. I'll add that I think Papers, Please would be worthy of V5 as well, since it would be an example of Video games as an art form. Maybe as a separate proposal. λ NegativeMP1 20:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I would support re-including Papers Please. I distantly remember that it's been on the list years ago. Makkool (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. I want to take this opportunity of discussing indie game representation on this list to bring up a list I made a while ago for what I view to be the most important indie games, the "indie game canon" as I named it. This list was obviously made by me and my own opinions (though I did my best to try and make it objective), but if anyone is opposed to Stardew Valley's inclusion (which I'm on the fence about myself), then I think Tier 1 and 2 on this list are good places to start for different options for indie representation. λ NegativeMP1 01:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add Paul's Boutique

edit

I think we can squeeze in one more hip-hop album. Paul's Boutique influenced hip-hop production and overall the golden age of hip-hop. With the lead saying it sometimes referred as the "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band   4 of hip-hop," I think this is a reasonably add.

If we get this added and Fuck Tha Police (discussion here), I think the hip-hop and rap section of modern music would be good enough to be "complete." Not much to add really from this genre IMO other than maybe Fight the Power (Public Enemy song)

Support
  1. per nom 49p (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per 49p. Also, it's currently rated Top-importance in Wikiproject Hip hop Makkool (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Social studies

edit

Widely taught in schools. Interstellarity (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. How did we forget this! Makkool (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion

Remove To Pimp a Butterfly  5

edit

Too recent with no proven industry impact. While this album was critically acclaimed, it's not even a decade old and has only one paragraph worth of legacy made up of about three sources. Compare this glaring lack of proven industry impact to an album like The Marshall Mathers LP   5, which has substantially more. There's also no miscellaneous reasons I could think of to justify listing it despite being recent, like ones I could see for Red, and I think what impact there is with this album is already covered by listing Kendrick Lamar   5 himself. I say that we remove this album and reassess it at a later date (preferably when its at least a decade old).

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 00:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Going neutral on this one now after seeing its critical acclaim is far beyond what I anticipated. λ NegativeMP1 05:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  1. (I'm whipping this up on mobile, so I apologize if it's incoherent) This album is a sore thumb on the list IMO. I mean it's good and very critically acclaimed, but it doesn't live up to the other albums we list. We list albums like My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy   5 because of the massive influence. Did TPAB influence albums? Sure, but I don't it's justifiable or largely influenced by what we list. We don't need to list albums because they're good. For example, you might argue that we list The Marshall Mathers LP   5 because Eminem is well-known, and this is arguably his best work. I would argue it is mainly vital due to the album probably having one of the biggest controversies in music, where parents feared the obscene lyrics. It also showcased Eminem's emotional depth and anger coming from his background (A song's concept like Kim wasn't very popular). The same thing can be said with MBDTF, where we had songs like Runaway showcasing Kanye's vulnerability and many individuals stating that they were influenced from the album. The same case can be said for albums outside of Hip-hop. Jazz albums that have high reception, like The Black Saint and the Sinner Lady, aren't listed because they don't show influence like Kind of Blue   4 or Bitches Brew   5. It might be vital in a couple of years, but it won't be as instant-seeing as MBDTF. 49p (talk) 05:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I don't want to come across like barging your vote, but what do you mean by "sticking out like a sore thumb?" One, I don't get this idea that TPAB hasn't influenced any work yet when it has been frequently cited to be one of David Bowie's main inspiration for his final album. Second, it is not just viewed by critics as being "very good". I remember when this album came out; the critical reception at the time was on par with what Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band received when that album came out. It has been non-stop "this is one of the greatest albums ever made" praise since its release, and as evidenced by its current position on RYM it has shown no sign of receding. SailorGardevoir (talk) 07:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. This album might be a little too recent to be fully judged regarding its legacy (although you're acting like it came out in 2018), but to say it's just critically acclaimed is massively underselling it. To Pimp a Butterfly has not just been praised by critics, it has been frequently proclaimed for years following its release as being The Greatest Hip-Hop Album Ever Made. I'm not against having Red on here solely on the fact that its artist is a Level 4 article (in fact, that's basically been my rationale for some of my nominations), but its claim for vitality is much weaker than TPAB. SailorGardevoir (talk) 03:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    How am I acting like the album came out in 2018? And could we see examples of it being hailed as THE greatest hip hop album of all time? The only one I'm seeing in the article right now is the list from the Rolling Stones, the user-generated RYM, and some best albums of the decade lists. If there could be more concrete proof of that bold statement being as frequent as implied here then I'll withdraw. λ NegativeMP1 03:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. per above. Besides, it's currently #1 most highly rated album of all time on RateYourMusic. Makkool (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral
Discuss

Add Bad (album)

edit

It feels bizarre that we list at least six albums from The Beatles   3, but only one from Michael Jackson   3. He is the most important pop artist of all time, like how the Beatles is the most important rock band of all time, and so the two should be a bit more equal (especially since they're both V3). Also, pop could use a bit more representation in comparison to rock. So I'm nominating Bad, Jackson's second most popular and important album, to level it out a little bit more. Sure, its not as important as Thriller (album)   4, but this V5 and not V4 and I'd argue it's more important than listing Billie Jean   5 as an individual song, and its still influential.

On a side note, surely we could reduce albums from the Beatles to 3 or 4 to prevent over-representation right? Right now they're the modern artist/band with the most listed albums. Something separate to discuss.

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 04:59, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Also in favor of Off the Wall and "I Want You Back".SailorGardevoir (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Bad was popular, but "Off the Wall" was more influential. "writers have hailed it [Off the Wall] a landmark release of the disco era and, along with his next album Thriller (1982), among the greatest albums in history" Makkool (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I'll make a separate nomination for Off the Wall another date then, I feel like we can have both. λ NegativeMP1 06:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral
Discussion

Add Papers, Please

edit

We currently have no listed examples of an Indie game   5 (not counting the recent proposal of adding Stardew Valley) or one of Video games as an art form. Papers, Please is a game that ticks both boxes. And if this helps, it is considered one the best video games ever made and is one of the more successful indie games in terms of sales numbers (5 million units, compared to the recently removed Undertale's 1 million). Sure, it's not as well known as some other indie games and could be considered too recent, but influence ≠ popularity here and I think its proven itself worthy of being included for the sake of representation.

Support
  1. As nom. λ NegativeMP1 01:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Weak support; one could count Minecraft as an indie game (and the most important one at that) prior to Microsoft's acquisition. Needless to say, there's room for 2-3 indie games at V5, and I would prefer this over Stardew Valley. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 02:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support adding to represent video games as art Makkool (talk) 12:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Support. 49p (talk) 18:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discuss

BioShock   5 seems to be considered a example of games as an art form? Kevinishere15 (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Papers, Please used to be listed but was a casualty when the specific games list was purged down from 135+ entries. It was an imperfect (but still mostly good) process, some entries may be worth re-adding. Currently undecided on this one.--LaukkuTheGreit (TalkContribs) 09:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add Ambient 1: Music for Airports

edit

The "Electronic" section of "Modern Music" is surprisingly shallow. Only 3 recordings compared to Hip-Hop (13) and Pop (23). We even list two electronic musicians at VA4: Brian Eno   4, and Kraftwerk   4.

This suggestion is going off the philosophy of NegativeMP1's philosophy where "nearly all subjects at Vital 4 should have at least one subtopic at Vital 5" (see quote here). We currently list three recordings: Trans-Europe Express (album)   5, Discovery (Daft Punk album)   5, and Blue Monday (New Order song)   5. They are all reasonably vital (maybe you could argue that the last one isn't vital enough cause New Order (band) isn't vital). Eno is subjected to at least one album, given that Kraftwerk   4 has one. So we should select the album that people say "defined" the ambient genre. I would also argue that Aphex Twin   5's Selected Ambient Works 85–92 can also be added. But for right now, we should start here.

Support
  1. Support 49p (talk) 19:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. SailorGardevoir (talk)<
  3. λ NegativeMP1 20:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Head of government

edit

Should be level 4 alongside head of state. Just as important as that article. Interstellarity (talk) 22:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 22:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion

Add Parliamentary system

edit

A common type of government found throughout the world. Interstellarity (talk) 22:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 22:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Glaring omission; support. The Blue Rider   16:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion

Add Presidential system

edit

A common type of government found throughout the world. Interstellarity (talk) 22:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 22:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Glaring omission; support. The Blue Rider   16:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion

Add Semi-presidential republic

edit

Another common type of government, which divides the powers between the president, prime-minister and a cabinet. The Blue Rider   16:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nominator. The Blue Rider   17:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Good proposal. Interstellarity (talk) 18:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Discuss

Add Indictment and Arraignment

edit

These two terms are important in the legal system. Interstellarity (talk) 22:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 22:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion

Add Hit 'Em Up (and also Diss (music))

edit

You know who needs representation? Tupac Shakur   4. He's the only rapper we have at level 4 (although thankfully it looks like Run-DMC will be joining him soon) and we don't have any music from him listed. You know what else needs representation? Diss tracks. Whether they should or not, they play a major role in the hip-hop scene, as evidenced by this year with tracks like "Not Like Us" getting released. That's why out of all of 2Pac's music, I'm nominating "Hit 'Em Up". The epitome of the East Coast–West Coast hip hop rivalry, this has frequently been cited as one of the greatest diss tracks of all time, and also one of the most vicious as well. Rated high-importance on the Hip-Hop Wikiproject.

(We should also make diss (music) vital as well.)

Support
  1. Support both. SailorGardevoir (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2. Support both, per nominator. I'm actually surprised diss tracks aren't vital right now. λ NegativeMP1 20:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3. Support Hit em Up, neutral on Diss track. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 22:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Support diss, not sure about Hit em Up. Kevinishere15 (talk) 01:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Oppose both. Diss tracks feel a bit niche topic to consider vital. A song at V5 shouldn't have this narrow scope, so I wouldn't oppose something else from Tupac that had wider cultural impact. Makkool (talk) 21:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I would not be calling diss tracks too niche. They have played a major part in hip-hop since 1984 with the release of "Roxanne's Revenge". That's forty years of "being a niche". It has certainly lasted longer than Beatboxing   5, whose cultural relevance did not made it to the 90s. (NOTE: This is not an advocacy for removing beatboxing.) Also, while it is primarily associated with rap music, technically speaking any artist can release a diss track. "How Do You Sleep? (John Lennon song)" and "Bad Blood (Taylor Swift song)" are prominent examples of diss tracks that aren't hip-hop songs (Kendrick being a featured artist in the remix of the latter notwithstanding.) SailorGardevoir (talk) 21:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss

Add World Trade Center (2001–present) and/or One World Trade Center

edit

These seem to be better additions than my nomination for the plot of land. Interstellarity (talk) 00:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. Interstellarity (talk) 00:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
  1. Too recent to assess their vitality in architecture. Makkool (talk) 08:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Neutral
Discussion

Add Never Gonna Give You Up

edit

The song is not only vital for being recognizable, but also for being an example of an Internet meme   5. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 01:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. As nom. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 01:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion

@NegativeMP1: You may be interested in this proposal. Vileplume 🍋‍🟩 (talk) 01:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Would Rickrolling make more sense? Is the meme more vital than the actual song? Makkool (talk) 08:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add Rescue

edit

To Social studies/Society, under Emergency service -3df (talk) 10:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support
  1. 3df (talk) 10:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose
Neutral
Discussion