Wikipedia articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | Total | ||
FL | 1 | 1 | |||||
GA | 3 | 11 | 14 | ||||
B | 7 | 5 | 13 | 14 | 39 | ||
C | 5 | 33 | 39 | 58 | 135 | ||
Start | 14 | 65 | 124 | 203 | |||
Stub | 1 | 10 | 45 | 56 | |||
List | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 15 | ||
Category | 109 | 109 | |||||
Disambig | 3 | 3 | |||||
File | 44 | 44 | |||||
Project | 2 | 4 | 3 | 156 | 165 | ||
Redirect | 1 | 7 | 37 | 89 | 134 | ||
Template | 2 | 57 | 59 | ||||
Other | 1 | 6 | 7 | ||||
Assessed | 14 | 57 | 149 | 300 | 464 | 984 | |
Total | 14 | 57 | 149 | 300 | 464 | 984 | |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 2,037 | Ω = 4.56 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Wikipedia WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia-related articles (for scope, see the WikiProject page). While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}}
banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Wikipedia articles by quality and Category:Wikipedia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions edit
- See also the general assessment FAQ
- 1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?
- The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
- 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
- Just add {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
- 3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?
- Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the project talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
- 4. Who can assess articles?
- Any member of WikiProject Wikipedia is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
- 5. How do I rate an article?
- Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
- 6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- 7. What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
- 8. Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
- 9. What if I have a question not listed here?
- If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.
Instructions edit
Quality assessments edit
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Wikipedia articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Wikipedia articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Wikipedia articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Wikipedia articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Wikipedia articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Wikipedia articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Wikipedia articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Wikipedia articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Wikipedia articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Wikipedia articles) | Category | |
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Wikipedia articles) | Disambig | |
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Wikipedia articles) | Draft | |
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Wikipedia articles) | File | |
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Wikipedia articles) | Portal | |
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Wikipedia articles) | Project | |
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Wikipedia articles) | Redirect | |
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Wikipedia articles) | Template | |
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Wikipedia articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Wikipedia articles) | ??? |
Quality scale edit
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion] | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | 30 years war |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Wikimedia Foundation |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wikitravel |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Bellevue School District |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Geographical bias on Wikipedia |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of Wikipedias |
Category | Any category falls under this class. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | Category:Wikimedia |
Disambig | Any disambiguation page falls under this class. | The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. | Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. | Wikipedia (disambiguation) |
File | Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. | The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. | Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. | File:Wiki.png |
Portal | Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. | Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. | N/A |
Project | All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. | Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. | Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. | Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia |
Redirect | Any redirect falls under this class. | The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. | Wikipedia:List of media personalities who have vandalised Wikipedia |
Template | Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. | Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. | Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. | Template:Wikipedia |
NA | Any non-article page that fits no other classification. | The page contains no article content. | Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. | N/A |
Importance assessment edit
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Wikipedia articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Wikipedia articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Wikipedia articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Wikipedia articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Wikipedia articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Wikipedia articles) | ??? |
Importance scale edit
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Wikipedia.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. | Wikipedia |
High | Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. | Wikimania |
Mid | Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | Polish Wikipedia |
Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. | Malayalam Wikipedia |
NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | Category:Wikipedia |
??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. | Magnus Manske |
Requesting an assessment edit
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- Requesting reassessment of George W. Minns. It's initial assesment was in 2007, and I have added roughly 10,000 bytes in the last few months. SammySpartan (talk) 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Jaedyn Shaw Joeykai (talk) 22:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Patrick_Troughton. It's been "Start Class for a while, but I feel it is at least a C if not a B. Rankersbo (talk) 12:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Regina's historic buildings and precincts. It's currently rated a "B" class, but I think that's way over-rated, for reasons discussed on the Talk page. I'm not familiar with how assessments work and would like a new pair of eyes looking at it. I will try to improve it, but I think it needs a new baseline to start with. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of ICIMOD. I have completely rewritten this page over September 2022 - April 2024, added several sections and categories to it. Its existing assessment was done in 2006. The article stands significantly improved, and is of interest to several Wikiprojects in addition to those originally visible on its talk page. (talk) 28 April 2024
- Requesting a reassessment of Mount Scenery. I've added 10,000+ bytes (three new sections, references, images). Last assessment was Stub. Wondering if now C or B. Thank you! CareAhLine (talk) 01:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Money Money 2020. I've added over 4,000 bytes to the article, an entirely new section, added citations for almost all claims on the article and generally cleaned it up a lot. I no longer believe it should be classed as a stub. Beachweak (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a re-assessment of Meralgia paraesthetica. I have added 10,000 bytes, doubling the article size, and my edits are so extensive that I now have 80% authorship of the content. Snake playing a saxaphone (talk) 07:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment for Orbital (1991 album). I've updated the page significantly and replaced unreliable sources with more reliable ones. Also, I think this page was last assessed in 2009, and I think there has been plenty of new information added since then, not just from me. Tedster41 (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment for Transvaal Park. I've added over 6,000 bytes of information since it's initial review. – ReaganMc101 20:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment for Yelabuga drone factory. I've added about 10,600 bytes since its initial assessment of Stub Class. Thank you! – Primium (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment for Movement of the First. I've added over 15,000 bytes of information since it's initial review. – Primium (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassesment for Shahed drones. I've added about 30,000 bytes since its previous review, which scored it at Stub Class. Rater predicts B or higher with 93.2% confidence. – Primium (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for 2018–19 Point Loma Nazarene Sea Lions men's basketball team. JTtheOG (talk) 08:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for 321 Coffee, which was added to the mainspace on April 12 but has undergone significant revisions. Currently ranked at Start-class, but I believe it should be C- or maybe even B-Class. Dallasoliver (talk) 19:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for Amie Parnes, which was just added to the mainspace yesterday. Currently ranked at Start-class, but Rater is predicting a rating of B-Class or higher with 93.9% accuracy. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Requesting an assesment for Draft:Hirohara Shrine. A user with the name User:WC gudang inspirasi disregarded WP:AFCREVIEW and moved the page from Draftspace to Mainspace. Reverted back but assesment scale still asses it as 'redirect', halting the review process. the same user have done the same unauthorized moves with other draft articles and moving it to Mainspace. Kaliper1 (talk) 02:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Retracted, Fixed!- Requesting an assessment for Minia Biabiany. I have updated its sources, which appeared to be its main issue. User:ScorpioSunLibraMoon (talk) 9:50, 21 April (EST)
- Done User:ScorpioSunLibraMoon, upgraded assessment from Start to C.
- Requesting an assessment for Community gardens in New York City. It has been expanded upon since its original assessment in 2019. 9H48F (talk) 02:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for Tone_(linguistics), it has been significantly expanded upon and reliable sources have been added with greater detail. Justanotherinternetguyt@lk 13:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for George Robert Carruthers which I have significantly modified and expanded. Physhist (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for Pottawatomie Park, which I have just created. Dan • ✉ 06:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for Thomas Baker (Alaska politician). I have expanded the article significantly Sipik06 (talk)
- Requesting assessment for Botswana after re-reading, adding sources, updating data and images, adding context, and paragraphs. I would like to know if it is B-class worthy. 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for Diocese of Churches for the Sake of Others, which has been completely rewritten after COI editing and copyvios. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for Ralph Brazelton Peck which I've updated and expanded. D McParland (talk) 23:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for Carson Beck. I believe that the article should be assessed higher than start class following updates and expansions.--BullDawg2021 (talk) 21:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment for 1955 riots at the Pakistani embassy and consulates in Afghanistan, the page has been gone through enough changes so i put it up for assessment. Rahim231 (talk) 15:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Swim School, it has undergone some improvements by me & another editor and want an opinion! :) Georgeykiwi (talk 23:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done assessed as B-class. Still needs some copyedits here and there but overall, great work! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of S. L. Rose. The page has been expanded greatly since it was originally ranked a stub when I first created it, and it definitely merits more than a stub in its current state. TarheelBornBred (talk 02:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done assessed as C-class; consider expanding the Business subsection.
- Requesting assessment of Dirty Epic. It used to be a redirect but I have turned into a page and I would like to get it assessed as it has not been done so yet. Tedster41 (talk) 09:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Carl Bunch. Originally ranked as a stub, I've expanded the page significantly. Rater predicts the article could be considered as B or higher with 86% accuracy. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 19:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Remembrance Day (Hong Kong), which I created and expanded, for C class. CanonNi (talk) 07:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- ➡ Requests from March 2024: ⬇
- Requesting reassessment of Conservative Congregational Christian Conference. Significantly improved, currently start class.Dirkwillems (talk) 22:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Higher education in Norway Recently added multiple sections to the article Kjedsomstudent (talk) 29 March 2024
- Requesting for The Romans in their Decadence, recently finished translating from FR. Orchastrattor (talk) 20:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of the Second Shehbaz Sharif ministry page, currently assessed as a stub it has been significantly re-written and expanded in the past week. Canned Knight (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Maya Higa. It is rated as a start class on 6 April 2021, it has been significantly improved for the last 3 years. Http iosue (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of James Maddison, which was assessed back in 2016 as start-class and has been significantly expanded upon. Pksois23 (talk) 01:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting re-assessment of St Philip's Hospital, Sheffield Street, improvements have been made today and it (should) no longer be stub class. Rater claims it to be C class. CommissarDoggoTalk? 18:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Transgender people in Nazi Germany, which has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.13tez (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment/reassessment of Dee D. Jackson, which has been significantly expanded upon, cited to a greater extent and brought up to a more encyclopedic state of existence compared to its previous assessment as a stub-class article. TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment/reassessment of Tiziana Rivale, which has been significantly expanded upon, cited to a greater extent and brought up to a more encyclopedic state of existence compared to its previous assessment as a stub-class article. TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 17:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done to C-class. TheMysteriousShadeheart consider adding sources to the discography section, which is completely unsourced at the moment. Especially the rankings should be sourced. Broc (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Greatly appreciated! Shall source right away. ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done to C-class. TheMysteriousShadeheart consider adding sources to the discography section, which is completely unsourced at the moment. Especially the rankings should be sourced. Broc (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requestig Assessment of Talkata yet to be assessed ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ (talk) 18:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Omnichord, a stub class article that has recently been expanded. InDimensional (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done to B-class. InDimensional Very interesting topic, and it inspired me to do a little research myself. I found information on how the Omnichord has been used as a form of musical therapy, which I think will add a lot to the page. Anyway, this was well written and cited, though I wish there were more reputable/non-primary sources out there. I had to remove one of your in-line citations however as it didn't provide any information. I looked for a suitable source to replace it but I was unable to find anything, so keep that in mind when looking on how to improve the article. Cheers, Pac-Man PHD (talk) 21:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time and for the edits, I went through your changes and took some mental notes for the future. Agreed on the primary resources but there was some conflicting info about years of releases so they'll do for now. I will have to check out that article. Cheers. InDimensional (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done to B-class. InDimensional Very interesting topic, and it inspired me to do a little research myself. I found information on how the Omnichord has been used as a form of musical therapy, which I think will add a lot to the page. Anyway, this was well written and cited, though I wish there were more reputable/non-primary sources out there. I had to remove one of your in-line citations however as it didn't provide any information. I looked for a suitable source to replace it but I was unable to find anything, so keep that in mind when looking on how to improve the article. Cheers, Pac-Man PHD (talk) 21:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Uvula (band). It was assessed to be a stub on 17 April 2023, but has undergone much expansion since then. Dubna8 (talk) 06:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Battle of Batumi. It is rated as a start class, although it has been significantly improved recently. Bailer99 (talk) 04:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note user is a confirmed sockpuppet of @ArsenalAtletico2017 and has been blocked. CanonNi (talk) 08:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting re-assessment of Willy's Chocolate Experience. Originally rated as start class on the 28th last month, I believe it's since been improved a whole bunch and WP:RATER now estimates it's at B class. I concur with this, but an unbiased opinion would be appreciated. CommissarDoggoTalk? 17:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Already done @Voorts Assessed this last night, now B class. CommissarDoggoTalk? 11:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Maarjamäe, which I expanded on majorly recently. Would the future addition of images (planning to take in spring-summer) affect the assessment? Many thanks. MartinusK (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- ➡ Requests from February 2024: ⬇
🔵 27 of 52 requests done: 51.9% complete | ||
- Requesting assessment of Dylan Cartlidge, which I created last year and has yet to be assessed. WidgetKid (talk) 22:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Already done begocc questions? 08:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Chris Holmes (DJ and musician), which I recently created and has yet to be assessed. WidgetKid (talk) 22:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Assessed at start class, although article feels a bit POV, it reads ok. nice job! begocc questions? 08:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Landed (Ben Folds song), which I recently created and has yet to be assessed. WidgetKid (talk) 22:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done,Assessed as start class, article has a bit too many quotes from folds, though. begocc questions? 08:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Dan Goodwin, which I created years ago and has yet to be assessed. WidgetKid (talk) 22:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Kangaroo Route, It has not been assessed since 2007 when it was 6 sentences long and many editors (including myself) have put significant build out in the last 17 years towards the B Class checklist :). DigitalExpat (talk) 07:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Assessed as B class, great work! CanonNi (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your time and fair assessment @CanonNi, there were/are a lot of great contributors over the years! DigitalExpat (talk) 05:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done, Assessed as B class, great work! CanonNi (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Sault Ste. Marie Museum, I have expanded it greatly from its "stub" status. FUNgus guy (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done, @Fungus Guy: assessed as B class and added some minor corrections. Broc (talk) 07:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Hester Street, since I have recently edited it to provide a much more detailed, up-to-date picture of its subject matter. Loneclaire (talk) 18:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessments of Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody and City of L.A. Dep't of Water & Power v. Manhart I've created both of these pages and they have yet to be assessed. Tinfoilhat8001 (talk) 20:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of George S. Gaadt, which I spent yesterday rounding out and improving. Thanks in advance! Puppies937 (talk) 03:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done @Puppies937, upgraded assessment from Stub to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Brian Barnhart which I assisted on in October 2022. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 23:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done @GhostOfDanGurney, upgraded assessment from Stub to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for Battles for Vilnius (1918-1919).Its been on mainspace for 3 months and i have expanded it since.
- Please rate the Talk:Egov.Press article. Please rate the EgovPress article. If possible, corrected it to category B. Zzremin (talk) 14:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Banque de l'Indochine Building, Shanghai Daftation 🗩 🖉 12:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Already done @Daftation by @DoubleGrazing, who assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of the Wargasm (band). I have expanded the article over the last few months. Georgeykiwi (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Georgeykiwi Done content-wise it's a B-class in my opinion, I rated it "C" only because many of the references are dead, making verification difficult. If you rescue them, please ping me and I'll up the rating. Broc (talk) 11:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of the Parasram Maderna, which was initially a stub. I have expanded the article a few days ago. $arthakP (talk) 12:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Rohan Bopanna, I have added many sources and expanded the article in last few weeks. PrinceofPunjabTALK 06:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Mexia Supermarket, I spent most of my day creating the page on a whim so it'd be nice to get it assessed as I'm thinking of potentially putting it in for a DYK. CommissarDoggoTalk? 19:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Tapir! - I gave it an assessment of C class myself, but I'd like an independent review to see if it hits B class (I think it does, but I might be biased since I wrote it). Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 08:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Paradox of Tolerance. I spent a lot of time expanding this a few weeks ago and requested an assessment via the Philosophy WikiProject, but following the changes to the assessment process I'm resubmitting my request here. Thanks! Ddevault (talk) 09:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Chachmei Lublin Yeshiva. Article assessed as stub class in WikiProject Poland, and start class in Wikiproject Judaism. Expansions were made, along with some recent note-worthy content. It has been greatly expanded over the past 17 years. NeverBeGameOver (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Zen of Python. Article is assessed as stub class and I have made some improvements since then [[1]] Erictleung (talk) 19:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Capital punishment in Georgia (country). Article was assessed as stub class in 2008 and contained only one paragraph back then, but now I have added much more content.Srguan (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Parliament of Georgia. Article was assessed as start class in 2009, but it has undergone many changes since then and has been upgraded significantly.Srguan (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Conservative Party of Japan. Article was made last year and still doesn't have an assessment. Anime King 🎌 (💬) (talk) 13:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Anime King Done. Small suggestion for improvement: add translations of the Japanese titles in the references. You can use |trans-title= in {{Cite web}}. Broc (talk) 10:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of 2024 Liberal Democratic Party (Japan) leadership election. Article was made last year and still doesn't have an assessment. Anime King 🎌 (💬) (talk) 13:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment for Li Yundi. It was last assessed 17 years ago in 2007. I believe it fits the criteria for B-class.
Also, I would like a reassessment of its importance. I believe it fits the criteria high, as the page is about a world-renowned pianist. Thanks EleniXDD (talk) 09:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for Sydney van Hooijdonk. It is currently rated Stub, and has been since 2019 despite major work on it since. I believe it fits the criteria for C-class, but would like an outside opinion on this, and if not C-class, which class it currently sits in. Christhecoolboy (talk) 16:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for Tyler1. To the best of my knowledge it has not had an assessment since the article was first created in 2018. I believe it is a B class or close to it, and I would appreciate feedback to better understand the criteria for BLP articles like this. Mokadoshi (talk) 23:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for Brownies & Downies. CommissarDoggoTalk? 02:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done I think Start class makes sense here because the majority of the article is specifically about the South African branch which no longer exists. I also believe extraneous detail should be removed. For example, a whole paragraph on Schultz's fiancé is not significantly relevant to a business with over 50 locations. With more English sources about the overall business this article would be greatly improved. I understand the frustration since there aren't many English sources. As an aside, it's worth mentioning that the article relies heavily on references to TimesLive which is on the Usable but be cautious list. I also fixed a minor duplicated reference. Mokadoshi (talk) 07:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I actually put in a request on WikiProject Netherlands out of a hope that some people there could grab some more info from Dutch sources just to make sure I don't mess up on some translation, but I'll probably end up just doing it myself.
- As for the fiancé situation I forgot to put in what actually made it a problem, the fact that the business was under threat. That being said, I don't think it was ever really specified why the business was under threat because of her being barred from the country so I'll probably just remove that para entirely. CommissarDoggoTalk? 10:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done I think Start class makes sense here because the majority of the article is specifically about the South African branch which no longer exists. I also believe extraneous detail should be removed. For example, a whole paragraph on Schultz's fiancé is not significantly relevant to a business with over 50 locations. With more English sources about the overall business this article would be greatly improved. I understand the frustration since there aren't many English sources. As an aside, it's worth mentioning that the article relies heavily on references to TimesLive which is on the Usable but be cautious list. I also fixed a minor duplicated reference. Mokadoshi (talk) 07:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Nikos Goumas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Dimitris Volonakis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Michalis Simigdalas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Spyros Pomonis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Andreas Theodoropoulos article which I created.BEN917 10:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Babis Psimogiannos article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Nikos Stathopoulos article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Spyros Stefanidis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Giorgos Skrekis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Lazaros Papadopoulos (footballer) article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Apostolos Toskas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Dionysis Tsamis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Giannis Mousouris article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Michalis Tzirakis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Spyros Thodis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Stavros Letsas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Panagiotis Stylianopoulos article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Giorgos Peppes article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Stavros Stamatis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Kostas Vasiliou article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the Dimitris Pittas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Srettha Thavisin, which has been significantly updated and expanded over the past weeks. Thanks! Bossza007 Here (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- ➡ Requests from January 2024: ⬇
🔵 28 of 31 requests done: 90.3% complete | ||
- Requesting a reassessment of Bertram Fletcher Robinson, which has been significantly updated and expanded over the past few months and which, now also includes new original material and images. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksamil (talk • contribs) 16:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Bruno Gaido, which I have been working on for a while and is now far more comprehensive than it was at its last assessment in January 2022 Wasianpower (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment for Émile Pouget, which I've significantly expanded and which was previously Stub class. --Aleksamil (talk) 22:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Already done by asilvering, assessed as GA. – Primium (talk) 17:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment for Irish folklore, last assessed in 2018 and is much more detailed since then. Splatterxl – talk 00:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment for the 1993 in Georgia (country) article which I created.Srguan (talk) 08:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Donuts (album). It was last assessed in 2007 and has improved since then. मल्ल (talk) 04:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a reassessment of Old Ironsides (trophy) as it has previously surpassed its current start-class designation. Dionysius Millertalk 14:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting re-assessment of Globe effect, which is no longer a stub.Merlitz (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting re-assessment(last was 2012) of Dalit literature, I've since added region and language specific content Rater says B or higher (91.4%) --Miximon (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of Deficit 83 Lines. (AlphaBetaGammsh (talk) 02:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC))
- Requesting assessment of article Chechen Revolution - wrote an article about the event. Previously was a redirect. Relahs (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment 3D-Jury after I've worked on improving this former stub status article, the status of which I've removed. Thanks for your review! Erictleung (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Already done by Begocc shown here here Erictleung (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of both the Tui T. Sutherland and Wings of Fire (novel series) pages. With deepest gratitude offered to all those involved, I have led the charge in undertaking major overhauls of the entirety of the content of the aforementioned articles, respectively commencing these efforts in August 2022 and January 2023. Seeing as to how these pages have changed exponentially since these efforts were launched, it appears that a quality assessment is again in order. Considering the interdisciplinary output of the affiliated WikiProjects these pages are related, coupled with my consistent presence on these pages (simultaneously preventing vandalism/fancruft and holistically improving sections), an "outsider's" perspective would be most welcome at this time. As always, feedback is welcome and greatly appreciated; I thank you in advance for your time and consideration! ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 05:43, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment on List of chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh, which I have worked on the leads of the article and the sub sections along with reformatting the tables with a better version and I think it deserves more than a list rating. 456legendtalk 15:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment on both History of the Aurès and Talkata Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ (talk • contribs) 14:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Already done by Johnsoniensis. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Downtown Rail Extension which is the most complete article I've created and has had contributions from a plurality of editors. -MJ (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Open Source Tripwire which I expanded from stub yesterday. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Already done by Deltaspace42. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a newer assessment of Clueless, which has had its Production and Release sections expanded. Thank you. Spectrallights (talk) 07:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done upgraded assessment to B @Spectrallights. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Jews in Madagascar is for sure not a stub anymore. Zanahary (talk) 10:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done Rating already updated by Generalissima. Thanks :) Broc (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- With the recent ICJ filing the Palestinian genocide accusation article is much more important. Perhaps its importance should be updated, if needed? Scientelensia (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- The ‘Mid’ tag on the Abu Haggag Mosque article is probably justified, but the article is no longer a stub. Scientelensia (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done@Scientelensia: I can't judge the importance, but I updated the rating to C-class. I also tagged a couple dead links, there is space for further improvement to the article. Broc (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Scientelensia (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done@Scientelensia: I can't judge the importance, but I updated the rating to C-class. I also tagged a couple dead links, there is space for further improvement to the article. Broc (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Bob Orders has, in my estimation, proper citations and improved organization which place it around C-class as opposed to start class. Given the minor shift from start to C as the request this is very low priority. Dionysius Millertalk 13:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done@Dionysius Miller: I upped it to C. In my opinion it could even be a B-rated article, but the lead needs some work following MOS:CITELEAD. Broc (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Broc Thanks a bunch! I was completely unaware of the standards for citations in non-BLP leads. I changed those a bit and cleaned it up visually. Dionysius Millertalk 14:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done@Dionysius Miller: I upped it to C. In my opinion it could even be a B-rated article, but the lead needs some work following MOS:CITELEAD. Broc (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Old Sydney Town, was previously a start article and I've done a lot of work to re-write and cite information. Thank you!! Cheers, GossieGoodTimes (talk) 00:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Bertram Fletcher Robinson. I have added fully referenced and original photographs and content to this article over the past few months and I now believe it fulfils the standard required for GA standard. Therefore, please can I request a reassessment and/or feedback about how to achieve a GA rating for this article. Thanks so much in anticipation of assistance with this request.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.214.91 (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Nubian ibex. I've added a lot of content over the last several months, bringing it from Start-Class to C-Class. Following further edits with in-depth citations, I would like to get the article to B-Class (and ideally GA when possible). Thank you, Bbreslau (talk) 17:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Indian Summer (EP). Created this article and would like it to be assessed. Thank you! 49p (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Already done by MusicforthePeople Broc (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of Thailand. Major cleanup tags were removed, in addition to some content rewrite, which might need a quality reassessment from external observers for impartiality.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kornkaobat (talk • contribs) 13:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting reassessment of History of fantasy. Massive swathes of unsourced or questionably relevant information, all written in a partisan, essayist style. Recently merged with another article so I can only hope the issues were a result of that because there is no way an article this bad should have slipped forward to B-class. Some of the sources are also derived directly from modern authors like Moorcock which seems like it could easily lead to biased writing - Fantasy is a form of genre fiction first and foremost, a work simply having supernatural elements does not warrant inclusion here without strong corroboration. Orchastrattor (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a re-assessment of 2023 Azerbaijani offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh. It is currently listed as C-class but I believe I've improved it enough to make it B-class. Hoping to turn this page into a GA one day. Ken Aeron 20:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a re-assessment of Emblem of Andhra Pradesh. It was in a stub category on the mainspace with start class assessment on it's talk page when I first took up the task to improve it. I have left some considerable amount of time after my development of the article to consider any more user requests and other consideration and everything seems to be fine now. 456legendtalk 08:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a re-assessment of Circa (company), I added some more details to it, some more references and pushed it past what I would see as a stub - looking for some eyes on it to see whether I'm right on that. Thanks in advance. CommissarDoggoTalk? 19:09, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done - CommissarDoggo, I updated from Stub to Start-class along with a few suggestions at Talk page, Assessment section. Cheers! JoeNMLC (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- ➡ Requests from December 2023: ⬇
🔵 29 of 31 requests done: 93.5% complete | ||
- Requesting a re-assessment of Liquid consonant, which I have restructured and to which I have added significantly more information. I hope this is also an improvement. Thank you! IlmarisenVasara 22:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Teangacha upgraded from start to C. To improve assessment, ensure that every statement has a citation. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you si much! IlmarisenVasara 17:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done @Teangacha upgraded from start to C. To improve assessment, ensure that every statement has a citation. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a re-assessment of Kamikaze Hearts, which I had initially assessed as C on 10 December 2022, but I feel that significant improvements have been made since then. Thanks! ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 21:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- @HelenDegenerate: nice article! I found two issues with sources which I tagged with {{cn}} and {{failed verification}}, once they are solved I would rate it B-class.
- Broc (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting assessment of article on the Oesterdam. I have overhauled this as it was previously just a redirect link to the main Delta Works article. I've made it into an article on this dam (the longest in the Delta Works) in its own right. Thanks. D McParland (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Already done by @Ruud Buitelaar, who assessed as B. @D McParland Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of articles on Delhi Transport Corporation and Delhi Ring Railway, which I have improved a lot over the past few weeks. Thank you. Kool Nerd 123 (talk) 07:35, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done Delhi Ring Railway upgraded assessment from Start to C. Delhi Transport Corporation assessed by @Miximon as C. @Kool Nerd 123. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Kia ora, requesting an assessment of Crate Day, I've updated it to include more background about its origins and related events but not sure if it falls under Start or C now. Cheers. Dudsud (talk) 12:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done Upgraded to C-class; good work Dudsud! It looks like another editor had already bumped it to start-class. For images you may want to check: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Beer_crates Something lacking in the current article is a description of the celebration: to what degree is it a joke, to what degree is it celebrated, how widely, how is it (aside from the becoming drunk part) celebrated. Some parts cited to primary sources on Facebook like "mainstream rock radio station The Rock started The Rock National Crate Day" should be cited to secondary sources if possible. Rjjiii (talk) 05:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Police jury. This is largely a rewrite of an article that did not originally cite sources. Thanks in advance, Rjjiii (talk) 16:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an updated assessment of The Patriots (TV series) which is no longer categorised as a stub. I have made minor improvements to the article, but it seems to be above Stub level. Reader781 (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an updated assessment of Rudolph Glossop which I have expanded and added a number of citations too. Thank you! D McParland (talk) 21:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @D McParland, details at Talk; assessed as C-class and with a few improvements definitely B-class article. Cheeers, JoeNMLC (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- That's great, thank you D McParland (talk) 13:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @D McParland, details at Talk; assessed as C-class and with a few improvements definitely B-class article. Cheeers, JoeNMLC (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- I kindly request that these articles are assessed. Ọjà and Firewood in Nigeria. Thanks. --Olugold (talk) 10:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of No Pants Day which I have improved from a stub. I did not add pants. Cheers! BBQboffingrill me 05:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Rashmika Mandanna that I completely rewrote and added reliable sources to, along with the addition of her work that was uncovered previously. Thank you! Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 13:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of INS Mahendragiri that I started a few months ago. Thanks!Davidindia (talk) 05:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not done @Davidindia: it's a rather short page (194 words), which still gets categorized as a stub per WP:STUBDEF. I haven't changed the rating, but feel free to ping me once you expand the article further! I added a couple tags to the article, and made some style changes. Broc (talk) 14:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! My first article on war ships, so wanted a senior editor to check. Thanks and regards! Davidindia (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done - Davidindia, changed article from Stub to Start-class per Rater assessment tool prediction. JoeNMLC (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! My first article on war ships, so wanted a senior editor to check. Thanks and regards! Davidindia (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Not done @Davidindia: it's a rather short page (194 words), which still gets categorized as a stub per WP:STUBDEF. I haven't changed the rating, but feel free to ping me once you expand the article further! I added a couple tags to the article, and made some style changes. Broc (talk) 14:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Karnataka Motor Sports Club. Thanks! Davidindia (talk) 05:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Sequence analysis in social sciences. The article exists in its present form since over two years. It was prepared by a group of people from the Sequence Analysis Association but has not been assessed so far. We would appreciate any external opinion on this page. Thank you. --Yensaa (talk) 14:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Automotive industry in China. I have almost rewritten the article and I'm hoping someone could give me opinions on how to improve it by reclassifying it. Thank you! Infinty 0 (talk) 11:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of North–South Corridor, Singapore. I believe I have significantly expanded the original content and should not be a stub-class any more. Would like someone to help give their opinions on how it could be reclassified. Thank you! Chee Cheong Fun (talk) 08:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Odonestis pruni, which was originally a stub. I think it could be start-class now, but I could really use a fresh set of eyes to assess where it's ended up. Many thanks GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done@GreenLipstickLesbian: upped to C-class. Good job :) Broc (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of a page I made significant updates to: Ecological empathy Thank you! Zen Buddhista (talk) 15:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Zen Buddhista upgraded assessment from C to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Do you have any recommendations on how I could improve it further to achieve GA status? Zen Buddhista (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Adding a historical background section would provide readers with context on the development of this concept. Source quality is crucial; ensure all statements are backed by reliable sources and add citations where needed. Enhance the measurement section by detailing the tools used to assess ecological empathy and discussing their application in research. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Do you have any recommendations on how I could improve it further to achieve GA status? Zen Buddhista (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done @Zen Buddhista upgraded assessment from C to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of a page I made significant additions to: Cue reactivity Thank you!! Galaxywest (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of a new page Personality neuroscience created by me. Thank you! AbyssMoon124 (talk) 20:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of a new page I made: Ecological empathy. Thank you! Zen Buddhista (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Zen Buddhista - assessed to C-class article for now. See Talk "Article assessment" for details. Cheers! JoeNMLC (talk) 17:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the additions you made to my article, @JoeNMLC! I love all the Wikilinks you put in. I added a more substantial summary to the lead section (thank you for that suggestion!) and added more Wikipedia links throughout the article. Is it possible to have a reassessment? Thanks for your help with my article! Zen Buddhista (talk) 21:00, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Zen Buddhista - assessed to C-class article for now. See Talk "Article assessment" for details. Cheers! JoeNMLC (talk) 17:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting a new assessment of Yoshito Hori-assessed as a "Start" back in 2019. I significantly overhauled it since and this biography might qualify as a B. Much appreciated! Furoba (talk) 03:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Remembrance Day (Hong Kong), which I recently created by translating the article in Chinese and would appreciate any feedback. Thank you! CanonNi (talk) 23:57, 7 December 2023
- Done @CanonNi - I've assessed this as Start class for now. The main problems are the quality of references. Looking specifically at the Origins section, one of the references is permanently dead, and the citation at the end of the 2nd paragraph only seems to provide a reference to that last sentence and nothing before it (but I can't tell for certain). Lastly, the last sentence in the article has a reference to photos on Facebook, which makes me think this is original research. I'm assuming you can find some English references to the history portions of the article - there is no requirement for English references, but it makes assessment easier. If you improve this further, please submit another request, and feel free to ping me directly to get a quicker response if you want. Mokadoshi (talk) 02:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting a new assessment of Guy Lombardo-now assessed as a "Start". New sections, reference citations, audio links, and additional content has been added & this musician's biography might qualify as a B or GA (a nomination has been posted). Since Lombardo was known as "Mr. New Year's Eve" a speedy review might be useful just in time for the Holiday! Enjoy!. Ciao160.72.80.178 (talk) 15:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)NHPL
- Requesting an assessment of Portal hypertension, I updated this for a class & would appreciate any feedback. Thank you. Skam1279 (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Utopian thinking, I created this page mainly summarizing social psychological research on it. I would appreciate any feedback. Thank you! --- Kiwimiho (talk) 19:06, 4 December 2023
- Requesting an assessment of Friendship, I added two sections (evolutionary approach and friendship jealousy) and made major changes to the Non-human friendship section (formerly Inter-species friendship). Thank you! --NRodbruin (talk) 16:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)NRodbruin
- Requesting an assessment of Ecocide, any feedback on specific improvements that can be made really appreciated. John Cummings (talk) 07:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @John Cummings upgraded assessment from C to B. This article looks very good and could possibly pass GA. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Rome Statute, any feedback on specific changes that can be worked on very much appreciated (thinking about trying to get it to FA). Thanks John Cummings (talk) 07:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Already done @John Cummings it is rated as C. Work on making sure every statement made has a citation with it. There are very many that need citations in this article. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of International Criminal Court, any feedback on specific changes that can be worked on very much appreciated (thinking about trying to get it to FA). Thanks John Cummings (talk) 07:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @John Cummings, upgraded assessment from C to B. I would recommend working on the citations and ensuring they are properly placed. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting an assessment of Outgroup Favoritism, a psychological bias contrasting ingroup favoritism. Lcupal (talk) 12:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Requests from 2023, January to November
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Requests from 2022
|
---|
|
Assessment log edit
Wikipedia articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
May 2, 2024 edit
Reassessed edit
- Detention of Pavel Pernikaŭ (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- English Wikipedia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Founders of Wikipedia (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Larry Sanger (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from High-Class to Top-Class. (rev · t)
- War of the Encyclopaedists (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Wikigrannies (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Wikimedia censorship in mainland China (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Wikipedia logo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed edit
- Index (publishing) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:Wikipedia article editnotice (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed edit
- Category:All articles with topics of unclear notability (talk) removed.
- Category:Bishonen test categories (talk) removed.
- ChemSpider (talk) removed.
- Category:Featured topic candidate log (talk) removed.
- Draft:George L. Ball (talk) removed.
- Draft:Golden Man Auto Parts L.L.C. (talk) removed.
- Category:Inactive WikiProjects (talk) removed.
- Category:Inactive Wikipedia database reports (talk) removed.
- Draft:Independent Age (talk) removed.
- John D. States (talk) removed.
- Draft:Napoleon Adok Gai (talk) removed.
- Category:Pages using backwards copy with unknown parameters (talk) removed.
- Draft:Ryan Blumenthal (talk) removed.
- Draft:Super Tech. (talk) removed.
- Category:Temporary maintenance holdings (talk) removed.
- Draft:Tor'i Brooks (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia database report templates (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia featured content candidate logs (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia files not suitable for Commons (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia free files (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia page-section templates (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia proposals (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia sections (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia vandalism-related user templates (talk) removed.
- Draft:Woja Emmanuel (talk) removed.
May 1, 2024 edit
Renamed edit
- Draft:List of Monuments in Bajrayogini, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Shankharapur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Balambu, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Chandragiri, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Bhutkhel, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Kirtipur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Budhanilakantha, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Budanilkantha, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Chalnakhel, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Dakshinkali, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Champadevi, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Kirtipur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Chhaimale, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Dakshinkali, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Chobhar Adinath, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Kirtipur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Danchhi, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Kageshwari Manohara, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Dharmasthali, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Tarakeshwar, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Sangla, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Tarakeshwar, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Satungal, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Chandragiri, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Saukhel, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Dakshinkali, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Suntol, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Shankharapur, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Thankot, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Chandragiri, Nepal.
- Draft:List of Monuments in Tokha-Chandeshwori, Kathmandu renamed to List of monuments in Tokha, Nepal.
- Draft:Madeline The Person renamed to Madeline the Person.
- Draft:Ruth Nvumetta Kavuma renamed to Nvumetta Ruth Kavuma.
- Draft:Sport Zone renamed to Sport Zone.
- WP:Useskin renamed to WP:Skin.
Reassessed edit
- Axel Downard-Wilke (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Lucy Moore (archaeologist) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Siobhan Leachman (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed edit
- John D. States (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Removed edit
- Template:ACE MassMessage opt-out (talk) removed.
- Draft:Aidan Cutler (talk) removed.
- Draft:Akbar Shahpurwala (talk) removed.
- Template:AprilFoolsNotice (talk) removed.
- WP:Beta Cluster (talk) removed.
- Draft:Buragadda Vedavyas (talk) removed.
- Template:Burma-shave (talk) removed.
- Template:Category warning (talk) removed.
- Draft:Christopher Manske (talk) removed.
- Draft:DeAna Fai (talk) removed.
- WP:Don't retaliate (talk) removed.
- Draft:Essay; Wikipedia is not a reliable source (talk) removed.
- Hinton Ampner (talk) removed.
- WP:How to vandalize correctly (talk) removed.
- Category:Inactive task forces (talk) removed.
- Draft:Innovating Minds: Creative Thinking Process at JKITCDO (talk) removed.
- Template:Interlanguage link (talk) removed.
- Draft:Kalu Clinton (talk) removed.
- List (talk) removed.
- Template:Look from (talk) removed.
- Draft:Mai Sato Murder Case (talk) removed.
- Draft:Masline Investments (talk) removed.
- Mompesson House (talk) removed.
- Draft:Mundh (talk) removed.
- Draft:My sandbox (talk) removed.
- Draft:Myer R Wolfe (talk) removed.
- Template:NA-importance (talk) removed.
- Draft:Nelson Kwaje (talk) removed.
- Template:Non-free biog-pic (talk) removed.
- Template:Not Humor (talk) removed.
- Draft:Oleh Korikov (talk) removed.
- WP:One click archiving (talk) removed.
- Template:POTD/2010-06-18 (talk) removed.
- WP:Portal:Portal (talk) removed.
- WP:Precautionary principle (talk) removed.
- Draft:Precious Pepala (talk) removed.
- Template:ROOTPAGENAME (talk) removed.
- Template:ROOTPAGENAMEE (talk) removed.
- Template:RSS-Atom feed notice (talk) removed.
- Rainham Hall (talk) removed.
- Template:Registered editors by edit count (talk) removed.
- Template:Safety resources (talk) removed.
- Template:Sandbox-related templates (talk) removed.
- Draft:Sandrine Umutoni (talk) removed.
- Draft:Sharan kumar (talk) removed.
- Draft:Sierra Valley Gardens (talk) removed.
- Draft:Skantz (talk) removed.
- Draft:Skazz Shabazz (talk) removed.
- Smallhythe Place (talk) removed.
- Draft:Sparsh Suman (talk) removed.
- Draft:Stephanie Morales (talk) removed.
- Template:Template editor topicon (talk) removed.
- Draft:Third Folkung Uprising (talk) removed.
- Template:Toolserver IP (talk) removed.
- Template:Translate wikipedia (talk) removed.
- Template:UWRC October 26, 2015 editathon (talk) removed.
- Category:Uruguay Wikipedia administration (talk) removed.
- Category:Uruguayan Wikipedians (talk) removed.
- Template:User access levels (talk) removed.
- Template:User dislikes Wikipedia (talk) removed.
- Template:User topicon (talk) removed.
- Category:Users who do not wish to receive ACE messages (talk) removed.
- Template:Village pump page header (talk) removed.
- Template:WALRUS (talk) removed.
- WP:Wiki Loves X (talk) removed.
- Draft:Wikipedia Class (talk) removed.
- Template:Wikipedia article editnotice (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia articles needing expert attention (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia categories named after mass media companies of the United States (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia categories named after universities and colleges in North America (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia consensus-building templates (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia draft proposals (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia essays about building the encyclopedia (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia featured articles (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Uruguay (talk) removed.
- Template:Wikipedia sockpuppetry (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians by Wikipedia activity (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians from Baton Rouge, Louisiana (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians in Montevideo (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians in Tulsa, Oklahoma (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians in Uruguay (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians interested in Green Bay Blizzard (talk) removed.
- Category:Wikipedians interested in Uruguay (talk) removed.
- Draft:Will Price (talk) removed.
- Draft:Wpedia (talk) removed.
April 30, 2024 edit
Reassessed edit
- German Wikipedia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
April 28, 2024 edit
Removed edit
- Yuri Lushchai (talk) removed.
April 25, 2024 edit
Assessed edit
- Category:Wikimedia community projects (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed edit
- Category:Wikipedia community campaigns (talk) removed.