Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 7

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 6 November 8 >

November 7 edit

Template:Fossils (band) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only two independent articles (one for the band and one for its lead singer), which already link to and from each other. Mostly, a discography page in a navbox without navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. All the albums redirect to the band. Useless. --woodensuperman 10:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Contains Chinese text edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Back in 2006 it might have been useful, but it's 2017 now. Someone at the talk page said it best: "This warning is as useful as a warning that says "there are images on this page; you need support for rendering to view images otherwise you will see empty boxes".". Timmyshin (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete. I an sure this was discussed somewhere recently on WP but I can’t recall where. It’s hard to think now who would be reading WP on a platform that does not support Chinese automatically: all modern consumer mobile and desktop OSes support Chinese and have done for a decade or so. Articles with Chinese text normally have a link such as that provided by {{zh}}, e.g. Chinese: 中国; that is enough to help readers utterly unfamiliar with the language.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 08:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, doesn't add much value and contributes to clutter at the top of the article. Frietjes (talk) 13:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete – no longer useful, and the articles that use it are typically already cluttered with boxes. Kanguole 16:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Too much clutter for a warning that will only be an issue for a very small fraction of readers. Spellcast (talk) 10:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Smacks of almost a weird foreign bias in addition. 2610:130:104:900:7998:98C1:2C2D:18E0 (talk) 15:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • That doesn't make any sense. Can you explain your reasoning? 108.220.198.237 (talk) 00:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • I think they mean that it suggests that the reader is someone who doesn't regularly use, read, or otherwise work with Chinese text.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  19:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Look, it's 2017. It just isn't useful. It's a problem for very little, if any, portion of Wikipedia users, and it also says 'you may see empty boxes', which is never true. 82.42.112.140 (talk) 07:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The disclaimer is more unnecessary clutter than something of value, because those without "proper rendering support" would be in a exceedingly small group. And I can't imagine that there would be a lot of confusion of what kind of text would generally be in Chinese-related articles/sections with some common sense, certainly not enough to clutter articles with this disclaimer box. --Cold Season (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unnecessary disclaimer. Delete it. - Bokmanrocks01 (talk) 04:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. There was a discussion where the consensus was it's no longer useful, and I've removed the template from dozens of pages. -Zanhe (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Robust Unicode support is pervasive in 2017. Brandon (talk) 19:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unnecessay in 2017 --Eflyjason (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Disclaimer no longer necessary with robust Chinese text support on all modern computing platforms. Horserice (talk) 08:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No longer needed as it is outdated. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 12:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Quebec school board election results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

School board elections are not encyclopedically notable in their own right; standalone articles about many of these elections were deleted a few years ago and aren't coming back. And since a school board trustee would not be considered notable for that fact in and of itself either, the only way anybody named in these templates would ever have an article to use them on is if they subsequently went on to hold a more notable office, such as on Montreal City Council, in the National Assembly of Quebec or in the House of Commons of Canada — and even for the few who did, there's no value in retaining early school board election results as part of their "electoral history" — we're only interested in their electoral history as it pertains to those notable offices, not as it pertains to school board elections that we're not maintaining articles about. Bearcat (talk) 19:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the argument that there's no value in retaining school board election results in the electoral history of notable individuals (this should perhaps be the subject of another discussion), but I agree there's no point in keeping these templates. CJCurrie (talk) 03:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete. A strange way to present the information in them. If a noteworthy aspect of a person’s biography it should be worked into the text where its relevance will be clearer from the context, not presented in a table with only one entry.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 13:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eastern Province Kings Player Statistics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and out-of-date, could be used in Eastern Province Kings, but in that case one could include it in the article directly. Frietjes (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, added speedy deletion tag. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:E.N.V. Motor Syndicate aeroengines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all the working links redirect to E.N.V. Motor Syndicate Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Duleep Trophy cricket teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates navigation found in Template:Cricket in India Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Order of Glory edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused icon template Frietjes (talk) 18:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:POTD image/2007-01-01 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

these are all unused and redundant. for example, {{POTD/2007-01-01|image}}, {{POTD/2007-01-01|size}}, {{POTD/2007-01-01|title}} replaces {{POTD image/2007-01-01}}, {{POTD size/2007-01-01}}, {{POTD title/2007-01-01}} respectively. Frietjes (talk) 17:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. IIRC these were created when we were working out how best to do the templates. This was one of the candidates, but was not chosen. —howcheng {chat} 23:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Excel (band) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only one notable release. --woodensuperman 14:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Benediction (band) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:22, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No notable releases. Only links (some) band members. --woodensuperman 14:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Not enough entries to warrant a navigation template (band with no notable releases currently.) If anything, I see this trending downward too, as the only two band members with articles appears to be minimally sourced WP:BLP stubs. Sergecross73 msg me 18:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KZNPrimarySchools edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Deleted per WP:CSD#G7, based on comments by BoonDock (original page creator) below. All other editors' contribs were not significant. Floquenbeam (talk) 20:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KVMRT lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, replaced by Template:KLRT line Frietjes (talk) 14:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KL-RTS co/ERL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, replaced by the infobox in Express Rail Link Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KLITN-KLIAexp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not clear where this would be needed Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KML teams 2012–13 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

old, unused, and not needed Frietjes (talk) 14:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KL Sri Petaling Line ID edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, probably redundant to {{rint}} if it's needed at all Frietjes (talk) 14:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JavascripIDE edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, created back in 2014 for testing, no clear purpose Frietjes (talk) 14:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Songs in memory of Michael Jackson edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 14:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails most of the points WP:NAVBOX. No article, the songs don't refer to one another, etc. Best left for the category. --woodensuperman 13:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017 Big Sky Conference football season edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of Template:2017 Big Sky football standings Joeykai (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_November_7&oldid=1138373286"