Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 6

November 6 edit

Template:Women's football in South Korea edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all "Football in ..." templates include information on both men's and women's football in them and it doesn't make sense to keep two separate ones for South Korea. There is already an updated version of "Football in South Korea" with both information on it. AquilaXIII (talkcontribs) 22:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Absolutely makes no sense in retaining it. Z.I. Barbour (talk) 02:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jeb Bush sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 01:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused (removed by original author here) Frietjes (talk) 22:03, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 20:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Chinese historical biography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in mainspace and is obsoleted in favour of general-purpose infoboxes like {{infobox person}} and {{infobox officeholder}}. _dk (talk) 18:40, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Habib University edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No purpose. Delete it. Störm (talk) 17:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zhengzhou map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates the map in the article. Frietjes (talk) 14:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Star Trek Ferengi stories edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this template was "soft deleted" after being nominated for deletion by Od Mishehu in a discussion on September 19. it was subsequently recreated, but has the same WP:OR issues identified in the last discussion, and currently not in use. Frietjes (talk) 13:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Academy Awards hosts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 01:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a list of presenters of an awards program, this fails WP:PERFNAV. See precedent in similar discussions for Grammy Award hosts, Latin Grammy Award hosts, Guldbagge Awards hosts, MTV Video Music Awards Hosts, International Emmy hosts and Primetime Emmy hosts. --woodensuperman 12:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS11 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in {{Mathura–Vadodara section/src}}, which is nominated for deletion below. Don't delete {{BS11/safesubst}}. Jc86035 (talk) 09:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mathura–Vadodara section/src edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. /src subpages for converted route diagrams never caught on because they don't really do anything, and this is the only one. Probably not necessary; history merge with {{Mathura–Vadodara section}}. Jc86035 (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line-loc-alt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 November 16. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 01:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line-loc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 November 16. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 01:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS12 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Use {{Routemap}} for making wider route diagrams, because it tends to be slightly easier, and it runs faster, is slowly replacing the "old-style" templates up for deletion, and has additional features like allowing text overlay over image cells. To address other concerns from the previous discussion, diagrams on other wikis can still be converted with the /safesubst helper templates, such as {{BS12/safesubst}}. (Please do not delete the /safesubst templates along with these ones.) Jc86035 (talk) 08:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete after substing. These are not needed anymore because {{Routemap}} exists. epicgenius (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete and move the safesubst version to the parent names with a {{subst only}} tag to ensure it's substituted. Frietjes (talk) 13:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Stutterfly edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 01:15, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One of the album articles linked was redirected 3 years ago and there is no separate discography page, making this Navbox useless as a navigational tool. WP:NENAN StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 07:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not enough links to provide useful navigation. --woodensuperman 12:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS-overlap/x edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, use {{Routemap}}. Jc86035 (talk) 07:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS-altx edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, would be better as Lua. Jc86035 (talk) 07:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).