Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 14

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 13 December 15 >

December 14 edit

Template:Canadian Security Intelligence Service edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 06:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've just removed a column for "Agents" because everyone there was either a redirect to CSIS or a redlink. However, the template still has issues. First, there's no position known as "Chief" in CSIS. All persons in the column held various positions in CSIS. "Related agencies" doesn't seem to make much sense either - there are vastly more security agencies in Canada, it's not clear why these were chosen. The only thing that seems accurate is Directors, but I don't think a template is necessary for that. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Not enough meat on the bone and poorly organised. Per nom: Some people and organisations who/that were or seem to have been involved with CSIS in mostly arbitrary columns and the Directors. Debouch (talk) 20:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tomb Raider series Timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 06:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Considered WP:GAMECRUFT by this discussion. Not needed, is too broad and unwieldy. Soetermans. T / C 12:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, as commented at WT:VG. These two don't contribute to understanding encyclopedic significance of the subject—the cast lists and in-game location maps actually show little series continuity in need of explication. czar 14:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Conceptually, I'm not so against the timeline, but the layout, formatting, etc, is extremely ugly and not well displayed. To me, its more of a WP:TNT-delete. Sergecross73 msg me 19:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tomb Raider world map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 06:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Considered WP:GAMECRUFT by this discussion. Says "A map indicating places that Lara Croft visited on her various quest in the games", not suitable for Wikipedia. Soetermans. T / C 12:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, as commented at WT:VG. These two don't contribute to understanding encyclopedic significance of the subject—the cast lists and in-game location maps actually show little series continuity in need of explication. czar 14:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete strictly WP:INU content, not really defining characteristics of the series. Better covered briefly in prose, if at all. Sergecross73 msg me 19:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ethnic stereotypes USA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 25. Primefac (talk) 06:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous template

See Template:Stereotypes in the United States Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stereotypes in the United States contains every item found in Ethnic stereotypes USA and thus serves no purpose to have a second template. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • merge any missing links with the main template, and redirect or delete. Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CBF player edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 07:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template no longer functions since the CFB no longer maintains player profiles on its website. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CBF profile edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 06:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template no longer functions since the CFB no longer maintains player profiles on its website. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPL Winners edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 25. Primefac (talk) 06:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there really a reason why there should be a template for the winners of the Indian Premier League? An encyclopedic one? ArsenalFan700 (talk) 00:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case, then there should not be an encyclopedic reason for keeping Template:IPL Player of the Series. Do you have any explanation? — Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 11:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Never made it so I don't know. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If you want to nominate that for deletion then be my guest. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 12:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There's no problem in keeping these templates. Is there? — Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 08:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, here is one problem with keeping this template. This template just shows the teams that have won the IPL. There is already the IPL template which already lists all the eight IPL teams. Other than a few teams which leave/suspended and some which came in through rebranding/expansion, the teams pretty much remain the same since this is a league, not a tournament like the UEFA Champions League where all the teams that compete in it change yearly and that there is a process to qualify for the tournament in the first place. Eventually there is a good chance that every team can win the IPL so that would make the template kinda useless since there is already a template that lists the teams, whereas that is unlikely to ever happen with the Champions League or similar tournaments like it. You can make a section in IPL team templates (we should create these) where you list what honours they won and when (like in this). There are already a list of who the champions are and details of every tournament final. Basically, due to the nature of the IPL, there is no reason for a template detailing who the winners of every tournament are. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 12:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. What are you, Swastik? A kid in primary school? There was a lengthy discussion (in which i was a part of) already on some useless templates he created before. And now this. I need you to understand that you are wasting other users time with your school projects on wiki. The explanation given by ArsenalFan700 in the last comment is common sense. Shocked to see 2 similar templates on the same page (IPL). Chris8924 (talk) 20:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_14&oldid=1138533766"