Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 15

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 14 December 16 >

December 15 edit

Template:Miss Earth 2016 delegates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 00:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A navigation template that navigates to only one article. The event it covers has been deleted at AfD twice. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pisco cocktails edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G7. North America1000 17:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant. All links in body of navbox point to the same article. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wealth edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy to User:Anna Frodesiak/Red sandbox. Primefac (talk) 05:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Not a coherent group. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I just started it and am going to make it coherent and used, really. I could use a bit of help doing so. The navbox itself is a needed one. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it's too broad a topic to be effective as a navbox. What's the criteria for inclusion? It's difficult to define parameters for something this broad. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Allow time for the creator to expand and populate it in articles. This was created only one day ago. North America1000 14:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, North America. To save community resources, let's close this matter. I have asked at IRC if anyone can help expand it. No takers. And I just don't know how with such a navbox. That is why I mainspaced but didn't place it in articles. I normally develop them first. Best if this is allowed to get deleted. I can always dig up and userfy the deleted copy in the future. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Can we Speedy G7 it then? --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - template editors need to give time to the content editors before they do anything...with out the content there would be no navboxes to play with. --Moxy (talk) 02:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • This one feels overly broad off-the-cuff; this may be due to its lack of content. I do think the articles as they are being used presently don't present a picture of a coherent navbox, which is a requirement for a good navbox. (WP:NAVBOX) The creator seems to want to work on it, so I'm of the opinion that it should be userfyed without prejudice to re-moving to the mainspace after content is added. --Izno (talk) 12:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • userfy for development. Frietjes (talk) 15:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Userfied. Now at User:Anna Frodesiak/Red sandbox. If anyone wants to work on it there, fine. I'll probably leave it there for a year then zap it. Thanks all for your comments, and sorry to waste resources on this one. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pi Kappa Phi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. BethNaught (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two of the links, The Star and Lamp and The Ability Experience, are now self-redirects to Pi Kappa Phi. Once those are removed only two list articles remain, which seems superfluous for a navbox. Grayfell (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, standard linking will work here. just add {{main}} links in the main article's sections, and links back to the main article in the lead of each subarticle. Frietjes (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 Republican primaries edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge the Republican template into the general Election template. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 05:34, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:2012 Republican primaries with Template:2012 U.S. presidential election state results.
Most of the articles referenced in Template:2012 Republican primaries have been merged into the articles referenced in Template:2012 U.S. presidential election state results. Only the territory articles have not been merged. (The DC article was merged.) Fbdave (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • merge, sure why not. just make sure there are parenthetical links for any that have stand-alone articles. Frietjes (talk) 18:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_15&oldid=1077821962"