Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 175

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 170 ← Archive 173 Archive 174 Archive 175 Archive 176 Archive 177 → Archive 180

ChapmanBDSP

The page was rightly deleted, I need to do a total re-write of this. How do i do this? -Amz 1234 (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

My suggestion would be to create the page at Draft:Champman DBSP, place {{AFC Draft}} at the top of the page, and then follow the instructions on the template when you think it is ready for submission. That way, you can get feedback from experienced users without the threat of rapid deletion. See also WP:Your first article for advice. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:37, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

C.K. Thornhill

Article's creator has requested (here) undeletion to their sandbox. Thanks. -Dai Pritchard (talk) 15:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Richard Ashby Wilson

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -11raw11 (talk) 18:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

1. The page was deleted because it referred to a biographical person but did not have any references.

2. Added four references, all from reliable sources.

3. Request to have article undeleted.

@11raw11: - this clearly isn't ready for main space publication, and I'm reluctant to restore what is essentially an unreferenced vanity article (your autobiography, written by you) to main article space. I have restored it to Draft:Richard Ashby Wilson for you to work on and submit for review via WP:AFC when you're done with it.
Please read Wikipedia:Autobiography for guidance on writing about yourself. This is a highly discouraged activity. If you are not the subject of the article but are somehow associated, please read the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

nipissing judges

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Newontario (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

RTB2 again

Deleting ONE RTB-related page and leaving the others? How weird. -DTSFactory A vandal's worst nightmare 04:16, 7 February 2015 (UTC) DTSFactory A vandal's worst nightmare 04:16, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTB2, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ShedsForLessDirect.com

I, Shedsforlessdirect, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shedsforlessdirect (talk) 01:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done It was up for G13 and has since been contested and edited, so there's nothing more to do here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Ag Criost and Siol

I created this page a long time ago, and it seems to have been deleted. Is there are reason for this?

<redacted e-mail address>

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Senanok (talk) 10:57, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

  • @Senanok: are you talking about Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ag Criost an Siol? If that's the case, then it looks like it was deleted because it was an abandoned AfC draft. We cannot indefinitely host material that has been declined at AfC, but if you intend to improve the article (which was about a poem) and prove notability then we can restore it. I've also removed the e-mail address that you've posted since I don't want it to end up on a spam list somewhere. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

thanks for removing the email address., re: notability if you google it you will get 15,000 pages....

the reason I wanted to get a wiki page is that the poem was written 99 years ago for the death of my grandfathers sister. In Ireland most people would know the poem/song, however very few people will know the story behind it....— Preceding unsigned comment added by Senanok (talk • contribs) 11:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

  • @Senanok: Well... google hits aren't really a good way to establish notability- a better way is to show coverage in reliable sources like books and news articles. I'll go ahead and restore it, but you will need to show coverage in RS. I'll see if I can find one and put it on the article as an example of what you'll need. I'll also let people at WP:IRELAND know about the page and that you may need some help with it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:56, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Abhishek Ghosh

I, MozzieINbangla, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MozzieINbangla (talk) 20:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


I have not edited over six months because simply I am not a paid by any. It was deleted for being timed out. I can submit the scanned Standard Bengali and Hindi Newspapers (not local Newspapers but standard newspapers which has WikiPedia page themselves) where his Interviews were published. They were not paid interviews, they were published years before I started to create the page. I have no claim to make his page live. Undeletion to draft is the request. I simply do not want that, for my error of representation, the person or other person suffers. Deletion is a bad sign. Definitely he exists and has notability but unless I or someone submit the scans it is never possible to prove notability. I do not want to fight with anyone with notability where language is the barrier. Google and other systems takes a huge time to crawl about who has never promoted himself. https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?view_op=search_authors&mauthors=Abhishek+Ghosh&hl=en&oi=ao This was not present before. If he paid some SEO, they will arrange the things faster. Discussion will be better in a neutral view. Sorry for my English. MozzieINbangla (talk) 20:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Don't upload scans of newspapers, but you can add references to them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:18, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Wilra Malaysia

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Williamraj009 (talk) 00:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Wilra Malaysia is a public limited company in Malaysia with billion dollar revenue. i don't understand why its been deleted! i hereby requested to re fund back my page or give me good reason why its been deleted!

  Not done Hi :Williamraj009. Please click on the links provided in the page's deletion summary. In short, this was written like an advertisement, and more importantly it was a copyright violation. Please don't infringe on anyone's copyrighted text again.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Smokingroove

There was an overturned decision to keep a page that i worked for a very long time compiling Smokingroove. We were so happy when we found that we got to keep the page that the artists went on to publicize this to their 100,000+ social media followers. This was also to be my first in a series on Wikipedia and something i worked with the artists themselves to compile. They are the biggest DJs in this country and have made a social impact on the scene here and are such, worthy of addition to Wikipedia. Please look into this again as i think with your help, i can make the page fit into what you think could be a better page. This really would mean a lot to us here in Dubai where we've worked hard to create a social reflection of this new city. Thanks -BluntWorthy (talk) 05:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Note that none of the older deletions are overturnable here either, being G11 or A7 speedies. I will also note that the non-administrator close of that AfD debate was improper, which was why it was reverted. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

LeafletCorp

i want to refer to the content to improve and use it at some other place, also I wrote that because i found similar on HotDocs, will that be also deleted. -Manish K Singh 17:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. This was blatant copyright infringement of this site as well as blatantly promotional content. Please don't infringe on anyone's copyrighted material again.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

amrutha anand

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Cvjayanthy (talk) 06:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Amrutha Anand - All information entered here are true and we have all d evidence and reference for those things.. what is the reason?? if the article is to be altered we will do it..

  •   Not done The page wasn't deleted but I do have to say that this page shouldn't be deleted via speedy deletion since there is an assertion to notability. If anything, this really should go through an AfD to decide whether or not the claims are notable enough to warrant a page on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Offhand what I think is the biggest issue is that while you do have the record book listings, that isn't entirely enough to really show notability or to show that holding a record in these books is particularly noteworthy. Holding a record is good, but we can't verify if it's a world record, a nation-wide record, or a local record. The sources given also are a little troublesome since we can't really tell if This Yoga is really a reliable source per WP:RS or not, or whether or not she is affiliated with it. Not every media outlet is usable as a reliable source. There's also the issue of copyright as this link goes to a video hosting site and it's unclear whether or not the person who uploaded the video owned the rights to the video. However that said, I'm going to run this through AfD as opposed to speedy since there is enough here to squeak by speedy deletion guidelines. I'm also going to let the people at WP:INDIA know about the page since it's extremely likely that the coverage for Anand won't be in English and as such, may not be easily found by someone who doesn't speak Hindi or one of the other languages spoken in India. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

User:សីលាបាភ្នំ

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -សីលាបាភ្នំ (talk) 07:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC) I use to teach the students to make them understanding and help to translate with Wikipedia in Khmer language. Please allow this for me . thanks

  •   Not done you have already created this. If students are writing articles in Khmer then use of km.wikipedia.org seems more appropriate, but if is just for teaching perhaps you want Wikiversity instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Éclat Educare

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rjarmyspy (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. G11 speedy-deletions will not be restored here or anywhere else, either. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done Entirely promotional. You will need to start from scratch with this. First find substantial reliable independent references and base your writing off that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Children of Camp LeJeune

I would ask that this page be reinstated due to its noteworthiness.

This topic is extremely noteworthy. It has been featured on the front cover of Newsweek on July 25, 2014. There have been books written about it, namely A Trust Betrayed by Mike Magner, 2014. It has been on TV news in several states, and there is a draft bill for Congress to compensate the 17,000 children who were born there and poisoned. The VA also has a page on these family members of U.S. Marines and their right to medical care under the Janey Ensminger Act of 2012.

http://kltv.videodownload.worldnow.com/kltv_20150127194806120AA.mp4

The original page was a simple page until I had time to add more information, and there is plenty of information. It was deleted before I had time to add more information. --AndrewStraw (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC) -AndrewStraw (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (RHaworth (talk · contribs)) instead. Have you considered maybe going through the drafting process? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done Not much content there to claim any importance. Please recreate a draft at Draft:Children of Camp LeJeune. The text here written by you was "Children of Camp LeJeune refers to people who were either born at the Camp LeJeune Naval Hospital or lived at or visited the base as children between 1/1/1957 and 12/31/1987. This group is seeking compensation, health care, and admission of the wrong done to them." Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

2002 in Jordan

This Page Must add Some Contents on That Article But In Order To Un delete It Please Know I Will add Some Sources -Bryant2000 (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

SureType

A page of this name was deleted a number of years ago, but the term / technology seems to have gained notability meanwhile given the number of Google hits (and WP red links). Seems reasonable to restore and possibly improve the page in order to cover the topic as we do for a handful other input methods already. -Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MEElectronics

I, 1.4.244.165, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 1.4.244.165 (talk) 12:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

  • See also User talk:Enthdegree. Seeing the page land on the G13 eligibility multiple times, I'm disinclined to restore this again. Could an admin peak into the deleted page and see how much improvement to this article has occurred between November 2013 and May 2014. I suspect that no substantial improvements have occurred (as it's almost 6 months to the day) and therefore since this has been nominated for G13 twice I'm opposed to restoration without a solid promise for it to be improved. Hasteur (talk) 13:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
    The article draft was two sentences long. On the other hand, the company is clearly notable: [1]. I will restore the article if there is a promise to actually work on it this time. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:26, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
    Please restore it and let me take a look. 1.4.247.7 (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Sean Mac Erlaine/sandbox

I, Sean Mac Erlaine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sean Mac Erlaine (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

@Sean Mac Erlaine:   Not done. The content of your sandbox was a copyright violation from http://www.seanmacerlaine.com/about. Wikipedia cannot accept copied material without a formal copyright release. No doubt you could give one, but this text was far too promotional for an encyclopedia article, which requires a WP:Neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a site like Facebook for people to write about themselves - please read Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

PVDasm

I own the rights to the software! i am the coder, the programmer and the one who created that software, you have no rights to say otherwise. this software if a piece of programming history in the world of software engineering, reverse engineering, and programming -Shanytc (talk) 11:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done The article at its last revision was a link to an outside website and did not give any actual information to show that the software is notable. Now as far as copyright violations go, what WP:G11 referred to was that you had reposted content that had been put on another website. The website has since been deleted, but I have to assume that you did not have anything on the page that made the writing/content itself fair use. Even if you made the software itself fair use you must still make the writings on the page fair use as well if you want others to be able to use that text somewhere else, otherwise we have to assume that it is copyrighted and will treat it as such. You can file a ticket through WP:ORTS that gives Wikipedia permission to use any past or current text that you have made available on the Internet and that should take care of any copyright issues, which would enable us to restore the page history. (This would require that you show proof that you own the copyrights to the software and to the previously deleted page, which we'd need for the ORTS ticket.) However I do have to say that you would still have to show that this software would pass notability guidelines by showing where it has been discussed in sources that are independent of yourself and are considered to be reliable per WP:RS. Just claiming that the software is historically notable isn't enough to prove notability on Wikipedia- you have to show it through independent and reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Herman (lawyer)

I, NewAmerica101, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NewAmerica101 (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


hi, can you undelete the article, so i can continue editing it?

thank you!

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Tokyogirl79 (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:19, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
I have offered to restore it & mentor NewAmerica at his talk since he appears to be editing in good faith and put a lot of work into this. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Amir Javed

I, TheWikiLeadership, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheWikiLeadership (talk) 03:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done As I write this, the page has not been deleted yet. Further, it's not an AfC submission up for deletion under G13; it's an article up for deletion under A7. —C.Fred (talk) 03:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
@TheWikiLeadership: Please see our guidelines regarding biographies. In short, the subject of the article doesn't appear to be notable enough for an article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:CJ Burton

Howdy, I'm assisting a user in IRC over the above article; ticket:2015012210016797 has a sufficient licence statement, so if the draft article matches the Medium article, could you undelete? Thanks, Microchip08 (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done Harej (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Postcard Prabhu dayal Vidyarthi 1942.png

Processing ticket:2014112810003442 -Microchip08 (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  • The license in the file says "allowed use of this picture for all purposes", and this was considered to not be a license by the deleters. Is there any more specific license in the ticket? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    • Yes, but I need to see the image in order to make sure the new licence is valid :-) Microchip08 (talk) 10:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • @Microchip08: It is a different version of File:Prabhu_dayal_Vidyarthi.png. I have seen the tickets & it looks legit to me, but I'll leave the decision up to you. If you could close both tickets at the same time, that would be great. Let me know if you want me to combine the two versions into one location. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Erie Innovation and Commercialization

I, Keliro11, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Keliro11 (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This is an ongoing support group for entrepreneurs in the south central Ontario region -Keliro11 (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Kelly Styring

-SES6714 (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Maykenbel Properties

I, 82.152.182.59, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 82.152.182.59 (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Ashinaga (organization)

Page was deleted through speedy deletion A7. I intend to edit the page to establish importance and cite further sources. -Naomi.falk (talk) 21:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. @Naomi.falk: Hi Naomi. This may be a notable topic but the content you posted was a blatant copyright violation of the organization's LinkedIn page and thus cannot be undeleted. There is no technical impediment to recreating an article on this topic with proper content, citing reliable, secondary, independent sources, but you must not infringe copyright again. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

ShopProp Inc.

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Roblatshopprop (talk) 02:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done @Roblatshopprop:. It was deleted as blatant advertising, as seen in its deletion log entry and it certainly was. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum for promotion. This is not uncommon; many people don't really understand what an encyclopedia is, and mistake this site for something else being so used to various other types of online services where you can advertise yourself and write pretty much whatever you want. Nevertheless, this content had and has no place here. Meanwhile, the material you posted was also a copyright violation of [2] this site, and while I have little doubt you own the copyright to that content, even if it was suitable for an articles content, we would require you to release your copyright to the world in order to use it here (which is totally academic since we could not use this content). Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Amanda Rosenberg

A year and a half ago administrator User:Bbb23 deleted an article on Ms Rosenberg, as an instance of WP:CSD#A3. On 2015-02-05 I requested userification, because this google search made me think Ms Rosenberg did meet the criteria for meriting a standalone article. Bbb23 declined userification.

Since then another contributor User:DissidentAggressor created an article on Ms Rosenberg, without access to the deleted material Bbb23 declined to make available (Thanks!).

I disagree with Bbb23, as to the value of restoring deleted material, someone once thought was worthless. Obfuscating the earlier history of an article obfuscates who was interested in it. Who was interested enough to try to contribute to the version that was deleted is useful information. Those contributors may have been newbies, when they first worked on the article, but may still be around, and may have learned how to make more useful contributions. They deserve to be told that it was recreated. They may remember something worth adding to the article now that it has been recreated.

So, I request that the deleted revisions and the deleted talk page, if there was one, be grafted onto the history of the current article. If someone tagged it with {{a3}}, back then, please include those revisions. Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 18:57, 7 February 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 18:57, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done Clearly the deletion nominator did not give the creator a chance. But you can see the content was not worth preserving. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:15, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:DigiPas USA LLC

I, Jing jsb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jing jsb (talk) 02:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Weddington Way

I, Sweenkat, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sweenkat (talk) 04:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

@Sweenkat:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Amrutha Anand (2nd request)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Cvjayanthy (talk) 07:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

1 Amrutha Anand

2 Hi..In India Limca Book of Records is maintained by Coco cola company which is equivalent to the Guinness Book of World Records in India with emphasis on unique achievements of Indians within the country and abroad. It's a salute to all those Indians who want to do something different and be remembered for their distinctive deeds. This LBR is purely based only on merit basis comparing to other Records like India Book of Records, Asia Book of Records, Unique World Records LBR is More reputed and Standard one.. You can also refer this links for more informations about Limca Book of Records "http://www.limcabookofrecords.in/about.aspx" and "http://www.limcabookofrecords.in/rules.aspx" "http://www.limcabookofrecords.in/recordDetail.aspx?rid=45"..

In Wikipedia there is already a page for Drums Kummaran who is India Book of Record Holder did his record on Jan 2014. Limca Book of Records is more reputed and standard Organization than compared to India Book of Records..Drums Kumaran page Link "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drums_Kumaran". That Doctorate is provided by India Book of Records itself. Amrutha is also selected for that Doctrate award.

We also have news paper articles published Pls Find details attached


Kindly Consider this Request. We are Ready to Provide other details related to this record also.Thank you.

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that administrators here will not act if they are involved in the underlying content dispute, so posting sources here is useless. Also, if the AfD is closed as delete, the page cannot be restored here; the proper venue for AfD'd pages is WP:Deletion review. Lastly, we don't accept newspaper clippings as sources (and we delete them on sight if uploaded, as they are copyright violations); you need to cite the actual (offline) newspapers (see Wikipedia:Citing sources#Newspaper articles). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

As easy as shooting cats in a tree

Enter your ...

This new idiom is being discussed on a Land Rover general chat forum

see this post http://www.aulro.com/afvb/2316277-post67.html

It is no more controversial than an old idiom referring to shooting fish in a barrel

Shooting Feral Cats in Australia is legal and a humanely accepted method of environmental protection

here and then click the "Save page" button below -IslandContinent (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done @IslandContinent: There has never been a page by that exact title on Wikipedia; there is no page in the last 15,000 deleted edits containing "shooting" that could be what you intended, and your account has no deleted edits nor edits stopped by the edit filter. Thus I have no idea what deleted page you are seeking to have undeleted. In any event, Wikipedia does not normally have entries on words or phrases as words or phrases except in rare situations, where an entry on one or another can go far beyond a simple definition, and we certainly don't have articles on things only discussed in online forums and which are new. Wikipedia is for topics the world has already published substantive content about in reliable sources. See also Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary and WP:NOT#DICDEF.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Christin Service

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Amyfarrington10 (talk) 01:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC) Christin Service as tucker

  Not done. @Amyfarrington10: Hi Amy. While it is not a hard and fast rule, this probably should not have been tagged under CSD A1 for speedy deletion by User:Smileguy91 when it was (per the notes at the top of Special:NewPages and per here), but there's nothing worth undeleting. The entirety of the content was "Christian Service as Tucker" – which cryptic fragment is what you've also placed in your sandbox and written above, in lieu of writing out some actual basis for undeletion. What I suggest is developing the content in your existing sandbox, because posting this again would just result in its deletion again, unless you quickly added some proper article content (please note our requirements for topics to demonstrate notability and to have verifiable content through citation to reliable sources). Once the article is ready for the mainspace – if that's possible and which frankly I'm skeptical about given your sandbox and the impenetrable form of your request above, please prove me wrong:-) – it can be moved to an appropriate article mainspace title, be that "Christin Service" (whatever that is), or something else.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
@User:Fuhghettaboutit: Yeah, I should have A7'ed it after more careful consideration. Thanks, smileguy91talk 03:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
@Smileguy91: I'm afraid you missed Fuhghettaboutit's point. The point isn't that the tag was wrong, it is that it was done too quickly. Usually if someone only writes a few words and hits save it is because they wanted to make sure it works before writing the rest of the article. By tagging quickly, you discourage them from writing the article. There is no harm in waiting say an hour before tagging in such cases. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Cybersemiotics

I, Crau999, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Crau999 (talk) 12:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, --Crau999 (talk) 12:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

ACID Cigars By Drew Estate

Hello, I am writing because I believe that the original article I wrote, "ACID Cigars By Drew Estate" should be undeleted. The original article was deleted under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic; and I attest that it was in no form written as any form of promotion or advertisement. The information on the cigars was gathered from Perlman's Encyclopedia of Tobacco and various other cigar magazines, all that were cited in the references section. I did include outside links to both ACIDNYC.com and DrewEstate.com, but only due to the fact that I honestly thought it was relevant to the content, not as a means of promotion. I will gladly remove the external links to keep the page intact. -LCPEREZ83 (talk) 14:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done When you write phrases such as "ACID cigars are all-handcrafted using the world's finest tobaccos" and "Each one of our specially crafted cigars are rolled in..." it is quite clearly advertising - you didn't even bother to hide the fact you are the manufacturer! If you are going to write an article, you need to start from scratch. However, I strongly advise against that given you apparent conflict of interest. If you insist on proceeding, please create the page at Draft:Acid cigars or probably better Draft:Drew Estate and use the article for creation process whereby you can get input from experience users. Please stick only to information found in reliable sources independent of Acid, and please use citations to back up the material. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Kaleb Whitaker

It is about a real person and i got permission "Save page" button below -Gibbs 21:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done - being a real person is not sufficient to justify an article. Subjects must be notable, which means covered by sources such as books, magazines, and newspapers, to have an article. Furthermore, the page looks like an attack page and those are not allowed under any circumstances. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Longstreth

I, Jsmith2122, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jsmith2122 (talk) 22:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

EDC Pro. Inc.

I, EvanDanielCollett, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EvanDanielCollett (talk • contribs) 03:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC) *Clerked the right name in Hasteur (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  • G7, not A7. The only content ever on the page was [[File:A|thumbnail]]. —Cryptic 14:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • @EvanDanielCollett: You are free to recreate the page (it should be at EDC Pro by naming conventions though) as a proper article - there is nothing worth undeleting. However, I suggest you read WP:your first article first for straightforward advice on Wikipedia editing. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Another good read may be WP:COI- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Tennis ball and ball sports conditioning

Enter your I just received new information here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rgsedona (talk) 06:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Clerking the Name of the page Hasteur (talk) 14:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done Although this was deleted as an abandoned draft, it could have and should have been deleted quicker as blatant advertising. The page even says "contact sales@company.com" for more information. Furthermore, even if it wasn't an ad, it wouldn't be an encyclopedic topic, but rather a how to guide. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nadia N. Shahram

I, 104.228.131.46, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 104.228.131.46 (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Clerking the name Hasteur (talk) 15:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

KIFS Securities Private Limited

As mentioned in the comment, I added more credible citations for the article to show that the article has credibility -AugustineJose (talk) 13:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   This page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. Hasteur (talk) 14:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • @Hasteur: FYI, any attempt to contest the PROD invalidates it, so it is best to remove the PROD yourself in such a case as this (while also instructed the editor they can do so themselves in the future.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • ThaddeusB I am only focusing on the request here as getting involved in similar requests previously has gotten me dragged into AfDs as the defendant for the submission. Putting the info in the advocates hands is as far as I go so as to prevent my further entanglement in the request. Hasteur (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • If someone griped at you for removing the PROD, they are clearly in the wrong. Admins are instructed to look for other attempts to contest the PROD before deletion and remove it if one was made. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

1985 in Jordan

I Will Add Some Source To That Page So I Will Add Some Events That Happened in Jordan -Bryant2000 (talk) 11:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  • @Bryant2000: I have restored the page to Draft:1985 in Jordan. Please add content to it, like you did with 2002 in Jordan and then move it back to mainspace (or ask for help doing so). Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • There were quite a lot of these created by OccultZone, Jackninja5 or Ser Amantio di Nicolao. About half of which were already deleted under A3. The rest of the empty ones have been moved to draft space. Come on guys - don't create empty articles. When you are actually ready to add content to the deleted ones, let me know and I'll restore them one at a time. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • And I see now it was done for many other countries too. Looks like I'm going to have to take this to ANI to get consensus to mass delete them. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

DMB_Charles

have deleted the article from other websites -Dmbcharles (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done Wikipedia is not the place for you to write about autobiography. —C.Fred (talk) 20:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Vivekchan

this is a user page with detailed useful information about Technology Consultant from India -113.193.175.212 (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

please stop the deletion of this page i'm intended to work on page -Vivekchan (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  Not done See WP:UPNOT. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alice Wilmarth Busing

I, 209.36.6.242, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 209.36.6.242 (talk) 23:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Farzana Mitu

Why this article deleted i can not understand. Farzana Mitu is many popular poet in Bangladesh. She lunched her poem book this year (2015) but she writing poem from 2-3 years. She also part of Bangladesh writing world. Many TV media, Daily Newspaper & online Newspaper talking about Farzana Mitu. I think people can known about this writer via Wikipedia, only for reason i am interested publishing her article. So I request you do not delete this article -Abirahmed bd (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please see the comments in the section above from the first time the question was asked. In short, you have several options on how to proceed. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Ryeland Allison

What was the exact reason this page was deleted? -2605:E000:6108:D700:7C61:37C:1C45:3BA1 (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

The page was deleted under the proposed deletion criteria. An editor (Tenure667) flagged it for deletion was the rationale "No indication of importance". No one objected, so it was automatically deleted after 7 days. The page can be restored upon request, no questions asked. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Article restored per this malformed attempt to request undeletion. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Willie Rometsch

I, Schmetty, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Schmetty (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Farzana Mitu

Why this article deleted i can not understand. Farzana Mitu is many popular poet in Bangladesh. She lunched her poem book this year (2015) but she writing poem from 2-3 years. She also part of Bangladesh writing world. Many TV media, Daily Newspaper & online Newspaper talking about Farzana Mitu. I think people can known about this writer via Wikipedia, only for reason i am interested publishing her article. So I request you do not delete this article. -Abirahmed bd (talk) 13:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

  • The page had 4 references to newspapers. While this is not absolute proof of notability, it should be sufficient to avoid A7 deletion. I also don't see the G11 case at all. In short, I believe Bbb23 made a mistake on this one. It happens, no one is perfect. @Abirahmed bd: I can restore this to draft space where you can work on it and get it checked by an experienced Wikipedian, if you like. Or you can take Hasteur's suggestion and inquire with Bbb23/deletion review. Let me know how you want to proceed. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • A couple of comments. First, I'm not the only administrator who thought it was an A7 as it was tagged by an admin. Second, with poorly written phrases like "She always imagining the luxury and open minded person" and "She like to expose peoples mind and nature. She love to see peoples inner beauty which reflex in their face and nature", not to mention almost identical pictures of the subject plastered on the page, as well as entire pieces of her poem or poems in the original language on the page. Although I know it's not a proper basis for speedy deletion, it's hard not to be influenced by the bad English and the gaudy style. That said, if you want to userfy it (the user hasn't requested that I do so), by all means. I would have done that anyway had the user asked.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_175&oldid=1142568669"