Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 170

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 165 ← Archive 168 Archive 169 Archive 170 Archive 171 Archive 172 → Archive 175

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adrian Norman

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Advance Cairns

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ADVANCE GROUP

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done Hasteur, I restored this one and then saw that it's entirely a promotion, so this one I'll leave deleted because of this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/advantages of online learning

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project-talk

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done I'm kind of iffy on this one- it's pretty much a repost of a personal email that someone sent someone else over permissions to use copyrighted materials. There's no article here, although I'll restore it if you want. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ah1

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ahern & Associates

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ahmad Zohadi

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ahmed Sabbour

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aid on the Edge of Chaos 92)

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aida Mugabo

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Air Canada Pilots Association

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aiyana Dixon

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AKA (Rapper)

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AIM9Nation

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

@Tokyogirl79: @Hasteur: sorry, did not intend to wheel-war about this. I declined a speedy last night because I misread 28 Sep 13, date of the last substantial edit, as 28 Sep 14 and told EoRdE6, the nominator, that it was premature. S/he pointed out my mistake this morning and I deleted it, not knowing that it had been deleted and restored in the meantime. I will of course restore it on request, or will not complain if you do, but I think that would be a waste of time as IMO it has zero chance of being an article - subject is a fan-group with 30 members. JohnCD (talk) 14:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
JohnCD IIRC, This was a eSports clan/team much the same way that Team Liquid is (which is why I commented on the draft to show a similar article) to hopefully spark the user's interest) not a fan-group. I would have preferred that you not have re-deleted the page again as my edit was defenitely invalidating G13 (as a real user had edited) and given the advocate (or one of the volunteers at AFC or a draft hunter) time to improve, but since I'm already being harassed to oblivion by Eo, I'm not going to make any more stink about it. Hasteur (talk) 15:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Well,   Done then for form's sake, no harm giving it another six months, but I don't think it has a snowball's chance of going anywhere - dropped in by a member fifteen months ago and not touched since, group had 30 members then and as far as I can see is now defunct. JohnCD (talk) 16:38, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Ata Online

I wrote an article about Ata Online. It is an investment company in Turkey. In Wikipedia, there are a lot of articles about companies. So that, I did not understand why my page was deleted. As a reason of deletion, kibele said that user name was inappropriate. I would like to change my user name then. But I do not know hoow to change my username. I am ready to change my article too. Can you please let me know where there was wrong sentences or plagiarism. Please let me know. Also I was wrting this aryicle for the company where I work so I have the rights of writing about it. -Ata Online Menkul Kıymetler A.Ş. (talk) 14:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

@Ata Online Menkul Kıymetler A.Ş.:   Not done. This request is your only edit to the English Wikipedia, and I cannot find any deleted article about Ata Online. If the article was in this English Wikipedia, please give its exact title and the username of the account that created it.
But I think probably your article was deleted on the Turkish Wikipedia, which is a separate organization, and you will have to ask about it there. Although you have been blocked there, you should still be able to edit your user talk page there. More advice on your user talk page here soon. JohnCD (talk) 17:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Alchemy Festival

31.52.245.208 (talk) 08:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

КомБайт

Speedy deletion of a page that does not meet the criteria. -Georgis bg (talk) 23:39, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title! Are you sure that the page's title is correct, including the namespace prefixes (User:, Wikipedia talk:, etc.)? No page with the given title has ever existed on en.wp. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
I've found the page I think you're referring to on Bulgarian Wikipedia. We cannot undelete pages on bg.wp (different Wikipediæ, different administrators); you will need to ask an admin active there to do so. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Цвиркун.JPG

An image (allegedly 5375947 bytes) was transferred to commons (56 KB) and deleted as {{now commons}} (F8). If the original size is correct something went seriously wrong. In that case please restore a local copy for a new attempt. -Be..anyone (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. from the file history, something evidently went wrong with the first transfer to Commons on 28 Oct 2012, but the file was then successfully transferred on 28 Aug 13, size 56 kb, and is still on Commons - click the blue-link above. It was nominated at Commons:COM:Deletion requests/File:Цвиркун.JPG, but the result yesterday was keep. JohnCD (talk) 13:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
I participated in the DR on commons, that's no problem. I want the original big file on commons, if it still exists here (assuming that the bug wasn't only an erroneous number 5375947.) As soon as that original file is on commons it would be of course again deleted here as "F8". –Be..anyone (talk) 16:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
I've looked at the deleted file - the image is identical with the current one, perhaps a slightly higher-contrast version, but the same size, 200 × 267. The size is indeed shown as 5,375,947 bytes, so there must be something very peculiar about it - that's more than 100 bytes per pixel.
Looking further, the Commons file history page shows that on 28 Aug 203 McZusatz uploaded the new version and then "changed visibility of a revision on page File:Цвиркун.JPG: content hidden (Absurd overhead)", implying that it's still there on Commons but hidden. I think you should ask McZusatz before restoring it. JohnCD (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Jup, I tried to make it clear by uploading the reduced size version again and giving the reason in the summary field. --McZusatz (talk) 20:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
@Be..anyone: there was something very peculiar about the file. Either the image generation script went awry and stored a bunch of unnecessary information at the end, or the uploader had something more nefarious in mind. I cannot figure out which of the two by basic inspection of the file, but there is no reason to have the original around. Also, you probably want to make your undeletion requests for a Commons image at c:COM:UNDEL. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Okay, so something big existed, was seriously broken, and only an embedded {{nowcommons}} thumbnail was usable. On the day when I stumbled over this oddity I copied a big Paco Peña in 1984.jpg here over a tiny thumbnail on commons (help desk request), and wondered if something with the transfers is systematically wrong. Thanks for checking.   –Be..anyone (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cancer Hope Network

I, Wandasd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wandasd (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:09, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Ladyliberty mackinacisland.jpg

I nominated the image for deletion on Commons. Perhaps there should be a local copy remaining, so it should be undeleted indefinitely as non-free image until the time being. -George Ho (talk) 06:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  • You are going to have to give a better reason for deleting, but it is not deleted yet, and also a better fair use rationale before it can come back here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

michael j brown linebacker

My apologies and I did not know that there was a time limit on references and nor do I know how to site an article. I just figured that someone would find something or site the article. I've never used Wikipedia before and this is my first article. The reason that I found it worthy of Wikipedia is because we share the same name. And furthermore I did find a website quoting him. http://thebettermentofmyself.webs.com/apps/blog/entries/show/24048511-1987-nfl-draft -Michaelbrown14455 (talk) 02:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

  • @Michaelbrown14455:   Done - I have restored Michael J. Brown (linebacker) and reset the clock. The Wikipedia:Verifiability policy is that "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and for biographies of living persons that is so important that they are deleted after seven days if unsourced. Unfortunately the source you have found is not good enough, because it is a blog (not reliable because not editorial control) and written by the subject himself. If he is notable, you should be able to find press reports. Wikipedia:WikiProject American football is a group of users interested in this subject; if you ask on their talk page, you may be able to get advice on where to look for sources. JohnCD (talk) 11:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Statue of Liberty New York Las Vegas.jpg

I nominated the image for deletion. It should be undeleted as non-free image. -George Ho (talk) 07:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Looks just like the original, so there is no copyright in the statue. So wait to see the outcome of the commons debate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neuralytix, Inc.

We started to develop it, and didn't realize there was a time limit. We want to continue to create it. thank you -Benwoony (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" I am concerned about the use of "we" above. There should be one Wikipedia user for each person editing, Accounts are not to be shared. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:29, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Center for Undergraduate Research in Mathematics

Dmcoff (talk) 17:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)


This article was deleted today because of inactivity. Please undelete this article because I do have changes to make to it for resubmission. We have been waiting for some published articles on CURM so we could increase the number of references (one of the problems why it was previously denied). As I am a part-time employee of CURM, this is the first chance I've had to get back to editing the article. Thank you. and then click the "Save page" button below -Dmcoff (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Alex Kupper

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -107.77.72.62 (talk) 10:54, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Buffalo Bills offensive lineman Alex Kupper

Draft:Paul Hallam

I, Marc.schroder, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marc.schroder (talk) 09:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done This appears to have been a blatant copyright violation of his IMDb bio.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

The Space Arts

Enter your inaccurate interpretation of the reasoning for listing here and then click the "Save page" button below -AnnaEleriHart (talk) 09:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 11:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Have you got any independent references that can prove notability? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I just noticed how she wrote in her request. She had to have pulled that from someone's humor page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I also want to note that this is copyvio from the official website so restoration probably wouldn't be an option in this situation anyway. Even if they file a ticket through ORTS they would still have to re-write it to meet the NPOV guidelines due to the promotional wording in the article (since it was pulled from the official website). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:St Winefride's Roman Catholic Church, Neston

I, Stwins, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stwins (talk) 09:57, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Didn't have time to edit it further - now have help to complete the task -Stwins (talk) 09:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done @Stwins:, I do have to give a slight word of caution. The article is kind of written in such a manner that it reads like it was pulled from an official website or summary about the church. It has some peacock sentences and words like "One of its most striking features is the obelisk cross bearing the inscription." I'd also re-write the sentence "The Bell, possibly the work of Mears & Stainbank, is rung every Sunday to call the faithful to mass.", as it also sounds a little promotional-ish in its tone. Plus I do have to warn you that your username "StWin" should be changed in order to reflect more on you as a person, as it gives off the impression that you are editing on behalf of this specific church. While you can edit with a conflict of interest, your username should reflect on you as an individual. Those are the two biggies- this still needs sourcing for notability but those others were the two that I wanted to mention. On a side note, is the church (or any part of it) registered as a historical landmark? That kind of gives automatic notability from what I can remember, so that'd be one of the first things I'd research and source. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I did do a quick look and didn't see it, but I'm glad you caught it. Normally I'm very good about finding copyvio. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Abbotswood, Hampshire

The development of Abbotswood, Hampshire has caused a lot of controversy and the original article did not have enough detail to be useful but I intend to update it. As this area is regularly in the news then I believe a Wikipedia article should be available. -STAXR36 (talk) 13:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Um, the article isn't deleted.   Not done, nothing to do. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:50, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
It was actually restored as a result of this request. Check the logs. (That's why I didn't reply that the page was already live.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DTDC Australia

I, Ausarpan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ausarpan (talk) 12:53, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frank S. Bates

I, 204.15.25.113, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 204.15.25.113 (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done The issue I first saw was that the page was pretty full of various weasel words and peacock type terms that would come across as promotional for Bates, enough to where you'd likely have to re-write substantial parts of the article to really make it fit the NPOV guidelines. A good example of something that would have to be re-written or just taken out completely would be sentences like "Bates is internationally recognized for his outstanding contributions and achievements as a polymer scientist." It also looks to be somewhat closely paraphrased at times from various sites like this one. If it was just one or the other I would have restored it because neither one was so bad that it would be something I'd decline on that basis alone, but together they pose enough of a problem that it'd just be better if you re-wrote it from scratch in your own words. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Shawn Oakman

unjustifiably deleted. Admin decided to take it into his/her own hands to decide who's notable or not. There were numerous sources provided in the article, that suggest an AFD would be the more logical move than to just flat out delete.-Yankees10 01:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

As the deleting admin, let me note that Yankees has repeatedly resisted my explanation and reminder that this article didn't have any secondary sources; all he's done is insist that the guy passed WP:BIO, despite providing no evidence for such a statement, let alone evidence of the significance that would ward off an A7 speedy. Note that administrators have broad consensus to bypass deletion discussion, at their discretion, and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media in a few situations, and this is one of those situations. Nyttend (talk) 01:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
@Yankees10: The page is ineligible for restoration by request because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7. Because the deleting administrator has already stated the rationale for deleting the page, you may bypass the step required in Wikipedia:Deletion review to contact the deleting administrator, and open a case there. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Tarek Najm

1. I am here to request a restoration of Tarek Najm's page on Wikipedia. The page was deleted on November by the administrator : Secret. The reason was irrelevant references been added on this page. First of all, I add some departments Tarek Najm run in the Microsoft as references since these department pages include hyperlink to Tarke's page. I think it may good to also include these departments page's link in Tarek' page if audiences want to go back. 2. I made some changes for Tarek's profile since I found out he already left Microsoft in 2013. Therefore, I updated his current status and occupations in order to provide more accuracy information. Last, even the administrator believed I should not add these references or updated information in Tarek's page, he can contact me or simply remove the references or additional information. It's very surprising that the administrator quickly made a decision to delete the entire page which already exists in Wikipedia for 4-5 years. I left messages on Secret's talk page to ask for restoration of Tarek Najm's page until Secret's quit suddenly. Could you please help to review this case, reconsider the deletion decision? I wish you can approve this request to make Tarek Najm's page back again.

Thank you so much~ -Faylinesong (talk) 22:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done The administrator did not "quickly" make a decision - it was the result of over three weeks' discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Tarek Najm which decided that the references did not meet the WP:Notability requirement for "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see also WP:Notability (summary). Because it was deleted after a deletion discussion, it will not be undeleted here, but, since Secret has retired, you may apply directly at WP:Deletion review.
Some advice, though: one of your edit summaries said "My boss asked me to edit his bio page", and you have already been warned on your talk page about WP:Conflict of interest. You must understand that Wikipedia is not a place like LinkedIn for people to post their CVs, or tell their subordinates to write about them: COI editing is strongly discouraged. If you make a request at Deletion Review, be careful to declare your interest. Also, Read WP:Bombardment and WP:AMOUNT. JohnCD (talk) 23:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
@Faylinesong: I believe have been communicating with you in OTRS. My advice to you was, after receiving no response from Secret, to take your case to Wikipedia:Deletion review, not post a restoration request here on this page. Your next step remains Wikipedia:Deletion review. To make your case, you must explain why you believe the outcome of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarek Najm was in error. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Eurachem

I, Slrellison, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SLR Ellison (talk) 12:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Ansathas/Context Matrix

I, Ansathas, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ansathas 20:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done – The content of the deleted article was only a few sentences and it made no sense: "In physics, the resultant value of any calculation is said in some unit, which is basically can be said as - "context". When that context is not tends to any change, the resultant value will be intact, else - it is that the value can be said by a locus [or] by a Context Matrix." Please start over and try to explain yourself more clearly. An article with no references is unlikely to be accepted. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JaamSim

I, Javasimulation, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Javasimulation (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marvin Etzioni

I, Thats Ent, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thats Ent (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I only received notice 15 minutes ago about this. Please undelete so I can work on it. The

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Dan Danila

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -88.67.28.245 (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I have similar Dan Danila author pages in romanian, german, italian and french ! Why did you delete my english page?

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. The article was PRODded, and the person who prodded it argued there were no independent sources proving notability (which is what we require here on the English Wikipedia). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
  Done, article restored, but I have proposed it for deletion again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Dănilă. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

MAMCM

This page had described the history and significance of the Mid-Atlantic Macromolecular Crystallography Meeting (MAMCM). This was the first such meeting in the United States (prompted by analogous meetings in Europe in the early days of protein crystallography), and it played a role in the development of protein crystallography, particularly in the eastern U.S. As an example of its broader significance (beyond Wikipedia in and of itself), the "History" link at http://www.mid-atlantic.org points to this (now-deleted) MAMCM Wikipedia page. -Cmura (talk) 17:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

@Cmura: The deleting administrator Kelapstick might be receptive to that argument, because you are making an assertion of significance, which should be sufficient to overcome deletion in accordance with WP:CSD#A7, although the article still may not survive a nomination at WP:AFD if it comes to that. Please make your case to the admin. Articles deleted by A7 are ineligible for restoration by request on this page. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
I don't find the argument particularly compelling, nor the fact that the organization is using a Wikipedia article as the history section of their website (which is a bad idea for a number of reasons, this being the least of them). However if Cmura would like to discuss the matter further, I am happy to on my talk page.--kelapstick(bainuu) 21:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Action Radius

The admin who deleted this page did not even specify a reason for doing so, and I would like to see the information that was there. If there was a valid reason for deletion then fine, but without the admin specifying a reason we cannot know what happened. This is my first time requesting undeletion, so apologies if I make any mistakes in this request. -Oogabooga007 (talk) 19:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

@Oogabooga007: The reason is there for anyone to see: "Expired PROD, concern was: No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONGS and WP:GNG". But because articles deleted via PROD can be restored by request. I done so. If the article is not improved, it will likely be proposed for deletion at WP:AFD. If deleted then, it cannot be deleted by request on this page. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Amatulić (talk) Not quite sure how I reply on here - wanted to say thank you, and also to clarify that the reason I did not see the admin's original reasons for deletion was a fault of mine - I had a web browser extension that hides comments and it doesn't work so well with Wikipedia. Since fixed, apologies for the trouble.-Oogabooga007 (talk) 21:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem at all, and you're welcome. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Siri Parakum

I, Harshana.nadeeshan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Harshana.nadeeshan (talk) 03:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

I am collecting more info on this page -Harshana.nadeeshan (talk) 03:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

@Harshana.nadeeshan: You asked that this draft be undeleted six months ago. That was done, and yet you did nothing to it. So now it has been deleted again. Wikipedia is not a service for indefinite hosting of material that will never be suitable for main article space. What assurances do we have that you will actually work on this article? ~Amatulić (talk) 04:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Midda's Chronicles

I, 151.33.149.77, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 151.33.149.77 (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jesse Shamata

I, Santarcangelo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Santarcangelo (talk) 04:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Philip Papaelias

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 77.49.34.207 (talk) 05:35, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Anthony Natale

Page was deleted and not contested at the time but shouldn't have been deleted. His website is at www.anthonynatale.net. He is a regular on the high ratings show called Switch at Birth. Please undelete. Thank you 2602:306:BD5E:5170:1444:6A39:F29E:E62B (talk) 10:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[1]

References

  1. ^ www.anthonynatale.net

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SongRepo

I, DarkLight1991, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DarkLight1991 (talk) 10:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done Several parts of the article were very, very promotional in tone and much of it appears to be copyright violations from various places like this blog. We cannot accept copyright violations and the promotional sections would require a complete re-write to meet NPOV guidelines, so it would be best if you just started from scratch and re-wrote the article in your own words. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Foxsky

I, 143.239.9.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 143.239.9.18 (talk) 10:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done It appears that part of the content is a copyright violation of this website, among others. We cannot accept copyrighted material unless permissions are granted via WP:ORTS, but even then this would have to be re-written in order to meet the NPOV guidelines as it is somewhat casual/promotional in how it is written. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JackFrancis Media

I, JackFrancisMedia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JackFrancisMedia (talk) 13:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:31, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Two notes, though: you need to change your username to something that represents you more as a single person and I would also recommend that you do better quality checking before resubmitting this again, as there are several grammatical errors and the article also needs more sourcing to show notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:31, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NB Publishers

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 152.111.1.27 (talk) 12:27, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done This is a copyright violation from the official website and only 1-2 words have been changed. Please understand that we cannot accept copyright violations and that closely paraphrasing the original content still counts as a copyright violation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NADCA

I, Lantzra, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lantzra (talk) 17:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

wish to edit and resubmit and then click the "Save page" button below -Lantzra (talk) 17:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. The entire article reads like an advertisement or company brochure, and would need a complete re-write from scratch to make it acceptable. Wikipedia is not a promotion or publicity medium. You are welcome to re-create the draft and start over. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Hindon, Rajasthan

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Tulshi Pandey (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Hindon is a city in Rajasthan, India. It population aproximetri 4,00,000 acording 2011.

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page is a redirect and was not deleted; a speedy was declined. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kasia Kaczmarek

I, Hkreview, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hkreview (talk) 01:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashes and Dreams

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 207.161.23.172 (talk) 00:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Kasia Kaczmarek

Would like to re-edit this page and address previous issues with approval. -Hkreview (talk) 01:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. I will be tagging it as an A7, though. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done However if two other independent people have written substantial material about this person you are welcome to recreate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Vierck%27s_law

Vierck's Law, a corollary to Moore's Law, was cited periodically on well-known blogs (e.g. Scott Hanselman) referencing Software Engineering as a discipline. As a member of the Windows NT team I (Benjamin Vierck) mentioned the law myself in some subsequent interviews. It occupies a tiny corner of Software Engineering, to be sure, but it does not deserve to be wiped from our shared culture altogether. As Machine Learning gains popularity 2015-2017 it may become relevant again in our conversation in that software that learns will violate the longstanding Law.

A classical law in the field of computer science predicting the longevity of software. The half life of any developed software product, library, or tool is 18 months. -Xcud (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title! Are you sure that the page's title is correct, including the namespace prefixes (User:, Wikipedia talk:, etc.)? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frank S. Bates

I, Nanoeclipse, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nanoeclipse (talk) 05:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_170&oldid=1083424614"