User talk:Yamanbaiia/Archive2

Reverted edit on Jonathan Pryce page

This is the official myspace profile of Jonathan Pryce. I added it as he doesn't currently have an official .com, etc. website that I am aware of. If so, then that one can be used as the link then. 69.133.89.131 (talk) 02:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

CSI episode pages

Just wanted to make sure you saw I said this:

Fair enough. I was really feeling after I made the nomination like I should have posted something first, hence why I posted on Wikiproject. Give me a few minutes and I'll withdraw the nomination.

-- Redfarmer (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Reverted edit on LOTR page

Hi Yamanbaiia, I appreciate your desire to prevent censorship when you reverted my change to the LOTR page. I didn't mean it in the spirit of censorship and I meant in good faith to improve the encyclopedic style of the article in accordance with the profanity policy. I have put a discussion of this onTalk:Lord of the Rings. I'd be grateful if you could take a look and then let me know what you think. best regards, Sanddune777 (talk) 23:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles January Newsletter

Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Wicked

Please see Talk:Wicked_(musical)#Chicago_Template.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka 3

Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate, that landed on WP:100! I paid close attention to everything that was said, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holiday season and all the off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, and have a great new year, --Elonka 07:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Connie Talbot image

Hi there- as you may remember from the Good Article review, we have both contacted Talbot's official site in an attempt to find images. You seem to be more experienced in this than me- I have never really requested images before. I got the following email back from Claire Freeman, which implies she has already uploaded the image, though I do not know where and whether it was done properly, and so I was wondering if you could shed any light on it-

I was sent instructions by [name removed] and told that to get the photos into the public domain i was to pick one of the four licences from the link she sent me see below: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Choosing_a_license#Common_free_licenses ].

Which I did! If it needs to be the GNU free license then fine - she didn't specify which one - just asked me to choose one.

If it needs to be the GNU free documentationlicense thats absolutely fine. Can you amend rather than have me go through the lengthy process of submitting the photos again?

If the image has been uploaded and procedure has been followed then that's fantastic- could you link me to the image or just stick it in the article yourself? Does this email mean more to you than it does to me? J Milburn (talk) 18:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I suppose I could upload, but all I was thinking was that she implies she has already uploaded the image. If you don't know anything about that, then I will just upload it and be done with it. J Milburn (talk) 19:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah- if you could ask an OTRS person on IRC, that would be great. I'm currently indefinately off IRC, annoyingly. J Milburn (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

That's fantastic, thanks very much. Presumably the OTRS volunteer will add a message to the article's talk page when the image is up? J Milburn (talk) 20:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I see you have added a link to the commons. Thanks very much for dealing with this, I owe you a favour! J Milburn (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to bug you again so quickly, but you have been loosely involved in the article, so I wondered if you could check the comments on the talk page about the external link to the German language fansite and offer a third opinion on the matter. J Milburn (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Rudget!

Dear Yamanbaiia, my sincere thanks for your support in my second request for adminship, which ended with 113 supports, 11 opposes, and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank my admin coach and nominator, Rlevse and Ryan Postlethwaite who in addition to Ioeth all inspired me to run for a second candidacy. I would also like to make a special mention to Phoenix-wiki, Dihyrdogen Monoxide and OhanaUnited who all offered to do co-nominations, but I unfortunately had to decline. I had all these funny ideas that it would fail again, and I was prepared for the worst, but at least it showed that the community really does have something other places don't. Who would have though Gmail would have been so effective? 32 emails in one week! (Even if it does classify some as junk :P) I'm glad that I've been appointed after a nail biting and some might call, decision changing RFA, but if you ever need anything, just get in touch. The very best of luck for 2008 and beyond, Rudget. 15:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Television infoboxes

Per consensus reached last year [1] as television is fiction and fiction is in present tense, all actors are to be listed unless the list is excessive. The CSI list is not and, by previous decision, Jorja Fox remains on the list. Thank you. IrishLass (talk) 19:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I replied on my page. I find it bothersome to have a discussion on two different pages. IrishLass (talk) 19:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I've removed my comments from the CSI talk page. I find it truly bothersome that someone would do such a thing without warning, or even a simple courtesy of "could we move this here." IrishLass (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Discussion about your edits

There's a thread on my talk page regarding your edits to a CSI article. Best regards, Rudget. 21:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I think it probably gave the wrong impression, but since you've apologised hopefully it should be over now. Regards, Rudget. 21:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [2]. --Maniwar (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello

As there are no animosities toward you, I'll smile and let you know, the discussion on DJS24's page has nothing to do with CSI, it's about Las Vegas (TV series). IrishLass (talk) 13:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: CSI Infobox

Do you know what the vandalism the user was being accused of on the Las Vegas page was? Redfarmer (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

The animosity they just sprung on me regarding my comment on the talk page indicates they probably don't want to listen. I don't know what kind of false accusations they think my post about agreeing that current cast should only be in an infobox was supposed to express. LOL. If they insist they want Fox in the infobox, we might as them why they're fighting so hard for Fox and not for Louise Lombard. Redfarmer (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I was never fighting for Fox, just another false accusation I can add to the list. IrishLass (talk) 14:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I didn't know you all were on IRC. What server and channel? Redfarmer (talk) 14:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Las Vegas Infobox Dispute

There has been a disscussion opened on the Las Vegas TV Series site on infoboxes. I would like for you to leave some comments. Thank You DJS24 --DJS24 (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan Pryce

Good job with the ref cleanup so far. It's looking better. I know it's a pain, but it's one of the most common criticisms brought up at FAC, so I wanted to prod you into circumventing it ;). BuddingJournalist 02:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

CSI:NY Characters

Thanks for your feedback on the character discussion. I've been playing around in my own sandbox before putting up anything live and wanted your feedback if you had a moment. It's my idea that this will be a page at CSI:NY Characters and the current Minor characters in CSI:_NY could redirect there. I'm curious on a number of issues, mainly if you had any info on Hammerback's character and also how many appearances a character should have to warrant a mention outside List of CSI: NY characters. Any input you have is greatly appreciated. Thanks! Travellingcari (talk) 23:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Point definitely taken re: the page naming. I don't follow much of the TV discussion because it has a tendency to degenerate into cruft. I may end up leaving the pages as are just replace some of the unsourceable text. Need to do some more thinking on this, especially the blatant copyright violations and, as my boss calls it, Department of Redundancy Department. You're right that Mac is a lead, however the issues surrounding information are such that it's a lot of the same information repeated and more actor-focused. I just did a re-write on Gary Sinise earlier this month and am really trying to keep the character/actor separate, if that makes sense. I see so much potential that I want do everything at once, but I'm sure you know how that is ;) Travellingcari (talk) 00:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, on behalf of Walt

Thanks for reverting vandalism on Walt Whitman's page. I was actually in the middle of a legitimate edit while it happened and obliviously editing away while someone kept adding "faggot" this and "faggotry" that. That's why it's such a pain to work on poor Walt's article! --Midnightdreary (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Ha ha! Thanks for the warning! :) -Midnightdreary (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

My User Page

Do you mean I can'y use pictures that already exist on the wiki? I took the V picture from the movie article and 4chan logo from the 4chan article; I didn't upload them.--Piepie (talk) 00:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

• KK. Thanks for the PROTIP. I'll fix after I'm done trying to fix my bungled ref on the Project Chanology paeg.

--Piepie (talk) 00:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD discussion for Michael Keppler

Just wanted to give you a heads up I nominated Michael Keppler for deletion here. I thought you may want to comment as the only person who has made any comments thus far is insisting the page should be merged and redirected to CSI:_Crime_Scene_Investigation#Past main characters. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 00:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Ipod to Itunes

Hi there. In case you weren't going to check back at the Computing reference desk now that you've gotten an answer and the question is getting closer to archival, I'd just like to point out that there's a program called Senuti that does what you want, and is much easier to use than copying the files from the Ipod directly (it even gives the files names based on their ID3 tags, instead of that automatic Ipod naming format). Confusing Manifestation(Say hi!) 02:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Ben

I was sandboxing a version in my userspace. I was going to get some interviews and the such to add on. Will ^(talk) 19:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Those section breaks are just for a break in reading, as I don't particularly like nine paragraphs of verbiage at once. We can't do pre/post crash like with the survivors, and the discharge seems like a good place to do an equivalent break. Will ^(talk) 20:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback?

Hey Yamanbaiia, seems to me that you oughta have rollback. I know you use a few scripts for your reverting needs, but rollback is better. :) Interested? faithless (^speak) 10:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah sure, but only if rollback doesn't take Twinkle or Popups away. Thanks for suggesting it.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 12:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

You should be good to go. :) faithless (^speak) 12:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again!--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 13:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

You're very welcome. Use it wisely. ;) faithless (^speak) 13:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 06:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

CSI Template

Sorry for the slow response, it's been a busy week for me. I have performed a selective undeletion of the template history going back to the original TfD, leaving the template's first incarnation deleted and the second one restored. Cheers, RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 21:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Gene Wilder

I do keep an eye on the page anyway, but I'll look at what you add. I did give a response to your reasoning on his date of birth, with which I do disagree, and gave my rationale for why I do. If you need anything from me, let me know. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Episode names

I see the change you made and it does appear you are right (did that happen while I was away?) which means we are going to have to rename an awful lot of CSI episodes. As long as they aren't planning on changing the policy again it does look like something that needs doing I'm not sure I'm up for the slog (why do I seem to make more work for myself? ;) ).

Perhaps we can get other people involved or something? (Emperor (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC))

OK cool. I may have made a bit of a mess fiddling around yesterday so if everything else is in hand I'll doublecheck my edits and make sure everything is OK. Cheers. (Emperor (talk) 13:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC))

And yes it would be worth adding in a few notes on naming guidelines - granted it might only be me getting confused but it'd be handy having something to help other people in the same boat (even if it is only a small one ;) ). (Emperor (talk) 13:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC))

The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past WP:GAN

Any update to your review of The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past? Cheers. Gary King (talk) 07:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I've taken the reigns on the nomination because the original nominator has retired from Wikipedia. I have updated the article to resolve the concerns that you addressed. Please reply back to the review when possible. Thanks. Gary King (talk) 00:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

CSI Project layout

Yes it could do with a tidy. The simplest thing would be to split off templates and guidelines to new pages and try and keep all the important information above the fold - probably useful links to project sub-pages down the right and perhaps a "to do" list down the right? It'd be worth raising on the project anyway but it gets my vote. (Emperor (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC))

Good stuff - I like it!! The only change I'd make is the background colour as there needs to be a bit more contrast. Technically the separate left and right columns look fine without the turquoisey background colour - so perhaps leave it out? Other than that it gets my thumbs up - it is a big improvement and if there are any issues they are minor ones that just require a quick tweak.

Goshin GA

Thanks for reviewing Goshin. I made some changes and responded at Talk:Goshin. Happy editing--ragesoss (talk) 05:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

GA

I fixed the refs of Alien Resurrection as you as asked. See if more is needed to pass. igordebraga ≠ 21:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

GAN

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For some tireless GAN reviewing - keep it up, it's very much needed! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Wilder

I just wanted to let you know that I tagged a small quote in the article for reference. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Rang De Basanti

I would if I could but I'm just very busy. So you are free to do so. Thanks for asking, enjoy the review. Shahid • ^Talk2me 11:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Noticed that you are a reviewer of this film article. Furthermore, I saw your edit that changed a sentence from "they is" to "they are". Acc. to the sentence, it says, that "...requests a group of youngsters that is nonchalant....", isn't it? The word group makes it singular, as far as I see. Thoughts? Besides this, please let me know if there is anything I can do to make your review as easy as possible. Thanks for taking out time. Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 18:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I ain't a native speaker and from your babel, I realize that I'm as equally equipped with the knowledge of English as you. But, my thoughts are that the sentence in the lead section is sort of a summary of her efforts. Whether she got them to the film separately or collectively, I feel that the word "group" deserves a singular status. Nevertheless, this isn't that important now. I'll have this on mind when I try attempting a close copyedit with an independent editor. Mspraveen (talk) 18:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm terribly sorry if my comments about your previous edit put you off the review. Since that wasn't my intention at all, please excuse me in case that troubled you. It is sad that you have stepped down as the article's reviewer. However, I sincerely thank you for your fine-tuning and your comments on its talk page. I've addressed them and I hope that these will help another editor in the GA review. In case you have anything else to share, please feel free to discuss with me or on the article's talk page. Once again, thanks a ton! Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 05:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Wilder GA

Do you think it's ready to send back? I did some work on it today. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Go ahead and let her know then. I just did some polishing and expanded a little bit about Radner. It's like I said on the talk page, writing about her always makes me a little sad. I think it's very possibly a future FAC. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations on the GA passing!!! Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying where you are now and from where you came. I was confused (nothing new) since I'd read on your page before that you were in France, then I saw Argentina and all the other places so I just wasn't clear. Gee, but I'm envious - I've been to Canada - and New York and New Orleans are like another world, but otherwise, I'm born, and stuck, in the USA. I've worked off and on with the Charles Manson article (which is in actuality already a good article, maybe even featured) but when I nominated it for GA, the other two involved editors flew into a bit of an edit frenzy and had a tiff, so I withdrew it. One of these days I'll be up to trying it again, when I'm feeling more assertive. Sorry about mixing up the book refs, it was a copy and paste error. I think in a week or two, when I've found my copy of It's Always Something, we could push Wilder further. Thanks for your note and right back at ya. Wildhartlivie (talk) 16:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

April GA Newsletter

The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 04:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: Lyon meetup

Dixit: Salut, tu devrais ajouter Rencontre/Rhône-Alpes à Wikipedia:Meetup, peut être qu'il y aura des gens d'un peu partout qui voudrait y aller et en plus la rencontre serait plus officielle. Si Stevage n'a pas fait la traduction laisses moi un message, je peux la faire et l' ajouter à Meetup. --Yamanbaiia(free hugs!) 14:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Ce serait très sympa de ta part! Merci. Thanks Otourly (talk) 17:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Could you do the translation, please? Otourly (talk) 16:40, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Désolé, comme le meetup est en décembre je croyais que je pouvais prendre mon temps pour le faire hehehe. Alors tiens, si ça te plait pas ou si j'ai fait des fautes dit moi ou change les toi-même sur ma sandbox. Si ça te plait met la au Wikipedia:MEETUP/Lyon ou je le ferais une fois que tu donnes l'OK. Salut.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 18:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Really good job! You should work in advertising, don't you? I'm OK for this translation could you post it on the meetup? Désolé de sembler pressé; Je suis un peu excité par ça, et puis comme la fête des lumières est un grand évènement je pense que c'est mieux d'avoir un peu de l'avance! De mon côté, je travaille sur une mascotte. Les Lyonnais se réuniront en Juillet pour définir un peu plus le parcours. Comme c'est la première, c'est un peu délicat! Mais je pense que de toute façon les lampions seront là! Regards, and thanks again Otourly (talk) 20:56, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

So, I have a question, Will you be in Lyon during the 8th december? Otourly (talk) 19:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I have added a mascot for this event ;) Otourly (talk) 19:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

It's nothing, I have redrawn already this and this one too so...If you need some SVG you could ask me Et ce n'est pas grave pour décembre, il y aura de toute façon environ 4 million de personnes! Otourly (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations. Thank you again, VanTucky

GA review mentor request

Hi there. I just did my first GA review, of Watcher in the Water, and I was hoping for a second opinion (I found your name on the GA mentors page). I've left notes on its talk page already, and I put the article on hold for a week. I'm just asking for you to check over my review and let me know how I'm doing. Once the week is up, if the article has been substantially improved, I'll probably also need help in deciding whether to pass or fail.

If you're too busy right now, that's perfectly fine! Just let me know soonish so that I can ask someone else. Thanks. Mr. Absurd (talk) 04:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC) (Please respond on my talk page.)

Lol

I see i'm not the only one who doesn't like stuff like this :P  Moo  Chat  21:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter

The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good articles newsletter

Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 02:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Invader Zim GA failure response

While your critique is appreciated, the phrases "doesn't read very well" and "too many images" are a tad arbitrary in the tradition of Mozart having written "too many notes"; if you could specify so we could make an article in better standing with the GA qualification, that would be great. And are IMDB and TV.com not reliable sources? Because besides DVD reviews, I can not find the Nielsen Ratings, actual show reviews, or anything that would be "verifiable" for sure. Of course, it could just take a bit more searching. Please, come take a look at the latest edition and give us your thoughts. :DLeslie Granger (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I am Leslie, I just haven't been logging in, and I apologize for being rude. I meant to just joke, but obviously my tone was inappropriate. Thank you for responding, and I appreciate that you responded. I am just frustrated that so little progress is made on this page, and your notes just seemed like such a challenge as it is. Please continue your excellent work, and once again, I am sorry for the tone of my response. :)65.12.233.213 (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Yamanbaiia

Eh? ;) giggy _(:O) 03:07, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Good idea, Giggy. Looking over Yaman's contribs and article work, I'd say that's an excellent notion. Much thanks for all your help in Depp- and Sweeney- related articles, Yamanbaiia. You've my support, should you decide to accept a nom. --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 21:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but like I already posted on giggy's talk page: I don't think my contribution history is strong enough to compensate for my lack of edits on Wikipedia space, so, thanks for the lol, but not yet.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 21:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you ever need a co-nomination, I'm sure DHMO and I would be willing to provide you one. Cheers, --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 22:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC).

Thanks.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 22:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

I'd give the nomination a thumbs up when you do it. (Emperor (talk) 22:44, 15 June 2008 (UTC))

Re: Robert Downey, Jr.

Well, I take my time with reviews, on some of 'em, and I didn't plan to review the article until like two days or so. Live in a cave? What are you.... Batman? ;) Though, Batman is better than Iron Man. Anyways, if you don't want me to review the article, alright. Though, this is the first time someone has told me not to review an article. Maybe because I'm a Batman fan. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Like stated at the GAN page, "Anyone can review articles". Well, if you want me to do it, I guarantee you that the review will be done before arriving to Sunday. I hope your kidding that you don't know "Batman". Also, no HE'S not Superman's sidekick, please. :P See, I live in a cave. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

I will, and I've taken your advice, I will review Paudge Behan and then "Iron Man". :) Yeah, you can say that Batman has been evolving and becoming more interesting. Whatever, Robin is totally this. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Otourly/Box SUL

Hi! Ça faisait longtemps! Est ce que tu peux me dire si c'est correct? Je préfère être sûr avant les test et une version plus officielle! (c'est directement inspiré de ce que j'ai fait (en partie) sur fr:Modèle:Utilisateur SUL d'ailleurs si tu es concerné tu peux la placer sur ton compte francophone ! Otourly (talk) 21:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

RDowney.jpg

According to the Commons deletion log, I hadn't listed its source. Unfortunately, I can't access the old image description page as I'm not an admin over there, and it's been far too long for me to remember where I found the image or even what it looked like. The current image doesn't seem too bad, anyway. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 21:03, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 21:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Wilder

I've been really tied up with some other things, but let me know where you're at and I'll take a look and maybe a pass. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Dirleton Castle GA Review

Many thanks for that! Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 10:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Yamanbaiia. I would like to thank you for your support in my RfA and the confidence expressed thereby. It is very much appreciated. :) The RfA was closed as successful with 73 supports, 3 opposes and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank WBOSITG for nominating me. Best wishes and thanks again, —αἰτίας •discussion• 23:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC) ber 2008 (UTC)

Paul Reubens

Just saw your fantastic work on this! I'm currently working on Phil Hartman's article, and was wondering if you found any sources for Reubens' page which would also be useful on Hartman's? Thanks. Gran² 17:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Fantastic, thanks. Anything on his work with Reubens would be very useful. Gran² 20:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CSI season 1 cast.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CSI season 1 cast.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Paul Reubens on hold

Hi! I have completed my review of the article Paul Reubens, and have placed the article on hold. Please see the talk page for details. Thanks, and good luck! CarpetCrawler (talk) 02:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

The article is looking good! See the talkpage for details and my latest response. Thanks and good work! When everything is finalized I will pass the article. CarpetCrawler (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Okey dokey, I'll take a look in a bit. :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations, the article has passed! See its talkpage for details! Wonderful job! CarpetCrawler (talk) 05:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Unexplained deletion

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samantha Ronson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Wow! in 2 years this is my first vandalism warning :((((((((. I thought that sentence was vandalism, that's why I didn't bothered with an explanation, sorry. In any case Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information WP:N, see the source.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 23:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

The version that I reverted to was decided by consensus. Please seek a change in consensus before reverting. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 23:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

a)The sentence was never discussed, you wrote it and no one agreed/disagreed, b) accusing me of edit warring? I reverted you once with a perfectly good explanation, cool it.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 23:28, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Apologies for any hostility; I don't see hostility on this talk page from me. I left my last edit summary on the Ronson page before reading the above and thought you were headed for an edit war. Now, regarding the consensus, if you'll take a closer look you'll see comments from editors in addition to me about the passage, so it's not just me. Secondly, the passage was achieved after long and heated debate on Talk:Lindsay Lohan for her article. I realize that's a different article, but many of the same editors were concerned with how the same information should be presented in both articles. So I think it's a reasonable consensus, not just my opinion. In fact, if you'll read the history on Lohan's talk page, I preferred it to be worded quite differently. Ward3001 (talk) 23:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed change to article guidelines

Yamanbaiia, I have suggested a change to our article guidelines here. As an active contributor to the project, I value your comments. Thomprod (talk) 15:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC)